Revision as of 16:47, 1 June 2007 editDESiegel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users50,971 editsm →[]: sp← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:52, 1 June 2007 edit undoDESiegel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users50,971 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Look if you persist in reverting to the unsourced version, the article is very apt to get deleted entirely -- in the version to which you edited it it is subject to ]. Please discuss this matter with me. If there are reliable sources for the accounts you have posted, they can be cited and then the information can perhaps be used. ] ] 16:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | :Look if you persist in reverting to the unsourced version, the article is very apt to get deleted entirely -- in the version to which you edited it it is subject to ]. Please discuss this matter with me. If there are reliable sources for the accounts you have posted, they can be cited and then the information can perhaps be used. ] ] 16:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Please discuss this with me, either here, or on ], or on ]. Please do not revert again. the ] prohibits reverting too many times on a single article in a single day, and you are approching the limit. ] ] 16:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:52, 1 June 2007
License tagging for Image:DSC01736.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:DSC01736.JPG. Misplaced Pages gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Nathan Hamilton
There were some serious problems with the Nathan Hamilton article both in terms of formatting and in terms of uncited but allegedly factual statements. Please read our Biographies of Living people policy, as well as our policy on reliable sources and our guideline on citation. I have rewritten the article, cutting it down to what could be reasonably well sourced. Please discuss the matter on Talk:Nathan Hamilton before trying to re-expand the article. Thank you. DES 16:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Look if you persist in reverting to the unsourced version, the article is very apt to get deleted entirely -- in the version to which you edited it it is subject to speedy deletion. Please discuss this matter with me. If there are reliable sources for the accounts you have posted, they can be cited and then the information can perhaps be used. DES 16:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Please discuss this with me, either here, or on Talk:Nathan Hamilton, or on my talk page. Please do not revert again. the Three-revert rule prohibits reverting too many times on a single article in a single day, and you are approching the limit. DES 16:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)