Misplaced Pages

Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:9 | 11 conspiracy theories Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:47, 25 May 2007 edit85.210.197.99 (talk) twats← Previous edit Revision as of 20:37, 25 May 2007 edit undoPablothegreat85 (talk | contribs)2,742 edits rvvNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
*Make all references conform to the citation style described in ].
Your 911 page is biased. 911 was an inside job. End of argument.
*Work towards a consensus on shortening the article.

*Conform lists so that there are no 'orphan statements'.
You should be ashamed for allowing yourselves to be corrupted so easily.
*Note that citation refers to WTC 7 only and not buildings 1 and 2.

You're either dishnoest, fuck-witted, or both.

Revision as of 20:37, 25 May 2007

  • Make all references conform to the citation style described in Misplaced Pages:Footnotes.
  • Work towards a consensus on shortening the article.
  • Conform lists so that there are no 'orphan statements'.
  • Note that citation refers to WTC 7 only and not buildings 1 and 2.
Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories/to do: Difference between revisions Add topic