Revision as of 19:43, 8 March 2007 edit88.212.159.239 (talk) History is ok |
Revision as of 21:10, 17 May 2007 edit undoDdstretch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,798 edits responseNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject Cheshire|class=stub|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WPE|class=stub|importance=mid}} |
|
|
|
|
|
<big><b>Assessment Report</b></big> |
|
|
#The major issue is the absence of References and Citations which are '''crucial''' for wikipedia, and so these '''must''' be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See ], ], and ] for guidance.) |
|
|
] ] 21:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
---- |
|
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
==Comment about lack of references]] |
|
this page may not have lots of refs but it looks pretty good to me (Gordon Emery - author and researcher, 5 Chester books written and 2 by other authors published |
|
this page may not have lots of refs but it looks pretty good to me (Gordon Emery - author and researcher, 5 Chester books written and 2 by other authors published |
|
|
|
|
|
:Thanks for the comment. Given your experience, then I'm sure you will appreciate why wikipedia wants to reference and cite as many sources as possible for the various claims made in articles. In which case, can I invite you to go through the article and add references for the various claims? If there are any which you feel cannot be verified in this way, then please feel free to mention them here where we can discuss them and decide whether to omit them or not. Many thanks. ] ] 21:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC) |
==Comment about lack of references]]
this page may not have lots of refs but it looks pretty good to me (Gordon Emery - author and researcher, 5 Chester books written and 2 by other authors published