Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:01, 12 January 2025 editTryptofish (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers69,629 edits →Arbitration motion regarding coordinating arbitrators: good← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:19, 13 January 2025 edit undoL235 (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators27,367 edits →Arbitration motion regarding coordinating arbitrators: thanks to the committeeNext edit →
Line 22:		Line 22:
	: ]<!-- ] (]) 23:49, 10 January 2025 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->		: ]<!-- ] (]) 23:49, 10 January 2025 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
	*Good! I'm glad that you did this. --] (]) 02:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)		*Good! I'm glad that you did this. --] (]) 02:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
			*I'd like to thank the Committee for its action here. The Committee's workflow challenges have long been a substantial concern and this could be a meaningful step in addressing them. When the Committee appoints the coordinating arbitrator(s), I would ask that the Committee announce who those arbitrators are; I think it would help the community (e.g., at ACE) to know who might be spending extra time on coordination efforts and may have less time for other arbitrator tasks. {{pb}} I also appreciate arbitrator comments such as ] by {{U\|Daniel}}, which suggest that if this motion is eventually seen as insufficient, the Committee will reconsider Motion 1. I certainly hope that the Committee will continue actively exploring ways to deliver workflow improvements that help arbs increase capacity and spend time resolving substantive issues. Best, ''']''' (<small>aka</small> ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ]) 22:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:19, 13 January 2025

Shortcuts

What this page is for:: This page is for discussion of formal announcements by the Committee, including clarification of the specifics of notices.
What this page is not for:: To request arbitration, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests. For information on the Committee, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee. To report a violation of a Committee decision, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Misplaced Pages Arbitration

About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)

Track related changes
v t e

Behaviour on this page: This page is for discussing announcements relating to the Arbitration Committee. Editors commenting here are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances, complaints, or criticism of arbitration decisions are frequently posted here, you are expected to present them without being rude or hostile. Comments that are uncivil may be removed without warning. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions.

Arbitration motion regarding coordinating arbitrators

Original announcement

Good! I'm glad that you did this. --Tryptofish (talk) 02:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to thank the Committee for its action here. The Committee's workflow challenges have long been a substantial concern and this could be a meaningful step in addressing them. When the Committee appoints the coordinating arbitrator(s), I would ask that the Committee announce who those arbitrators are; I think it would help the community (e.g., at ACE) to know who might be spending extra time on coordination efforts and may have less time for other arbitrator tasks. I also appreciate arbitrator comments such as this one by Daniel, which suggest that if this motion is eventually seen as insufficient, the Committee will reconsider Motion 1. I certainly hope that the Committee will continue actively exploring ways to deliver workflow improvements that help arbs increase capacity and spend time resolving substantive issues. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 22:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)