| Revision as of 21:21, 3 January 2025 editDanbloch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,578 edits →Merge: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:32, 3 January 2025 edit undoSome1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,246 edits →Merge: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| :::::Right, the contents of Draft:Generation Beta should get into User:Wesoree/Generation Beta and that should become the new Draft:Generation Beta. A merge is not a replace. <span style="font-family:Segoe Script">]</span><span style="font-size:115%">]</span> 12:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | :::::Right, the contents of Draft:Generation Beta should get into User:Wesoree/Generation Beta and that should become the new Draft:Generation Beta. A merge is not a replace. <span style="font-family:Segoe Script">]</span><span style="font-size:115%">]</span> 12:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::This all seems like a very strange discussion. The two articles are extremely similar and there's almost no content. The oldest member of this generation is two days old--there isn't much to say about them. Why are we talking about creating extra work? ] (]) 21:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | ::::::This all seems like a very strange discussion. The two articles are extremely similar and there's almost no content. The oldest member of this generation is two days old--there isn't much to say about them. Why are we talking about creating extra work? ] (]) 21:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::{{tq|which I believe it can pass}} Wouldn't it be better (and easier) to just edit over the redirect at ]? And have all of these drafts history merge or whatever into ]? ] (]) 21:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:32, 3 January 2025
Help!
Someone please help add sources to the draft page and expand it! Lil’ French (talk) 01:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have improved the draft page and have suggested merging the two Gen Beta drafts. Rager7 (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Lil’ French (talk) 23:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Merge
Also, I support a merge between the two drafts for Gen Beta. Rager7 (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- The reason I selected the user draft as the target is because that was the earlier page (from Nov 2023). It was also in mainspace and deleted at WP:Articles for deletion/Generation Beta, and restored. Jay 💬 18:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I think a merge makes the most sense as both cover the same topic albeit different aspects of the same generation. Rager7 (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes! I also agree with your point that both drafts should be merged, because they are both talking about Gen Beta! Lil’ French (talk) 23:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support a merge, but having the page at Draft:Generation Beta would make it a more obviously collaborative one. Belbury (talk) 10:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- For that I suggest moving Draft:Generation Beta to Draft:Generation Beta (2), and then moving User:Wesoree/Generation Beta to Draft:Generation Beta. Jay 💬 10:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- If you'll notice I've done work on Draft:Generation Beta and it is now up for review, which I believe it can pass, while User:Wesoree/Generation Beta can't. Any changes should be made to Generation Beta. Replacing it with Wesoree/Generation Beta would be a step backwards. Dan Bloch (talk) 16:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Right, the contents of Draft:Generation Beta should get into User:Wesoree/Generation Beta and that should become the new Draft:Generation Beta. A merge is not a replace. Jay 💬 12:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- This all seems like a very strange discussion. The two articles are extremely similar and there's almost no content. The oldest member of this generation is two days old--there isn't much to say about them. Why are we talking about creating extra work? Dan Bloch (talk) 21:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
which I believe it can pass
Wouldn't it be better (and easier) to just edit over the redirect at Generation Beta? And have all of these drafts history merge or whatever into Generation Beta? Some1 (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Right, the contents of Draft:Generation Beta should get into User:Wesoree/Generation Beta and that should become the new Draft:Generation Beta. A merge is not a replace. Jay 💬 12:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- If you'll notice I've done work on Draft:Generation Beta and it is now up for review, which I believe it can pass, while User:Wesoree/Generation Beta can't. Any changes should be made to Generation Beta. Replacing it with Wesoree/Generation Beta would be a step backwards. Dan Bloch (talk) 16:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- For that I suggest moving Draft:Generation Beta to Draft:Generation Beta (2), and then moving User:Wesoree/Generation Beta to Draft:Generation Beta. Jay 💬 10:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I think a merge makes the most sense as both cover the same topic albeit different aspects of the same generation. Rager7 (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)