Misplaced Pages

User talk:Thebrooklynphenom: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:04, 28 December 2024 editThebrooklynphenom (talk | contribs)31 edits A friendly warning on biographical sourcing: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 14:47, 28 December 2024 edit undoDclemens1971 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers16,844 edits A friendly warning on biographical sourcing: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit ReplyNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
:In fact it bordered on defamation and inflammatory content which resulted in several major archbishops of the Anglican Continuum deeply concerned at the verifiability that Misplaced Pages offers any person both living or dead. :In fact it bordered on defamation and inflammatory content which resulted in several major archbishops of the Anglican Continuum deeply concerned at the verifiability that Misplaced Pages offers any person both living or dead.
:thank you for being aware of this as I am also an editor of many pages. ] (]) 03:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC) :thank you for being aware of this as I am also an editor of many pages. ] (]) 03:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
::First of all, I did not add any information to the article at any point so please watch what you are saying. My issue is that ''you'' added content that was unverifiable/without sources. Do you have a conflict of interest with this subject? It sounds from your comment like you know or have some affiliation with Chase. If so, please familiarize yourself with ]. Finally, if you believe content is defamatory, please follow the procedures at ]. ] (]) 14:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:47, 28 December 2024

This is Thebrooklynphenom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Episcopal Church (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were: This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved. qcne (talk) 19:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Teahouse logo Hello, Thebrooklynphenom! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 19:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

A friendly warning on biographical sourcing

Information icon Hello, I'm Dclemens1971. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Darel Chase (bishop), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Misplaced Pages has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:17, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Yes you made a mistake. All the sources formally used were not accurate and did not portray the living person. In fact they violated Misplaced Pages because they were based on conjecture and poorly written pages that had nothing to do with Darel Chase.
In fact it bordered on defamation and inflammatory content which resulted in several major archbishops of the Anglican Continuum deeply concerned at the verifiability that Misplaced Pages offers any person both living or dead.
thank you for being aware of this as I am also an editor of many pages. Thebrooklynphenom (talk) 03:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
First of all, I did not add any information to the article at any point so please watch what you are saying. My issue is that you added content that was unverifiable/without sources. Do you have a conflict of interest with this subject? It sounds from your comment like you know or have some affiliation with Chase. If so, please familiarize yourself with WP:COI. Finally, if you believe content is defamatory, please follow the procedures at WP:DEFAMATION. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
User talk:Thebrooklynphenom: Difference between revisions Add topic