| Revision as of 15:53, 28 March 2024 editWolverine X-eye (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,495 edits →GA Review: CommentTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:42, 28 March 2024 edit undoFritzmann2002 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers13,015 edits →GA Review: replyTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| {{u|Wolverine XI}}, in the less than 14 hours since the review was last quickfailed, the article has not had substantive change per the feedback of {{u|Grungaloo}}. The only addition was a section on infections. The article still has the same major gaps in content, in particular: interactions with humans, hunting patterns, feeding, parental care, and information from the IUCN. Furthermore, a lot of the language is highly technical and difficult to read. As just one example, "There is evidence that the nominate taxon and the Javan fishing cat are distinguishable by skull morphometrics" is unbroachable to anyone who is not an expert in taxonomy. Please take time to address these concerns before nominating the article again, and please refrain from re-nominating any article so quickly without making substantive improvements after a quickfail. ] (]) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | {{u|Wolverine XI}}, in the less than 14 hours since the review was last quickfailed, the article has not had substantive change per the feedback of {{u|Grungaloo}}. The only addition was a section on infections. The article still has the same major gaps in content, in particular: interactions with humans, hunting patterns, feeding, parental care, and information from the IUCN. Furthermore, a lot of the language is highly technical and difficult to read. As just one example, "There is evidence that the nominate taxon and the Javan fishing cat are distinguishable by skull morphometrics" is unbroachable to anyone who is not an expert in taxonomy. Please take time to address these concerns before nominating the article again, and please refrain from re-nominating any article so quickly without making substantive improvements after a quickfail. ] (]) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::Stop assuming and look at the article history. ] <sup>(])</sup> 15:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | ::Stop assuming and look at the article history. ] <sup>(])</sup> 15:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :::. Aside from the infections section, one sentence on hunting has been added and three sentences on human interactions have been added. These do not adequately fill the content gaps identified in the last two reviews. I was not assuming, and I did look at the article history. Please do not remove GA reviews from the article's talk page. ] (]) 17:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:42, 28 March 2024
GA Review
Unsuccessful (still). Fritzmann (message me) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Fritzmann2002 (talk · contribs) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Wolverine XI, in the less than 14 hours since the review was last quickfailed, the article has not had substantive change per the feedback of Grungaloo. The only addition was a section on infections. The article still has the same major gaps in content, in particular: interactions with humans, hunting patterns, feeding, parental care, and information from the IUCN. Furthermore, a lot of the language is highly technical and difficult to read. As just one example, "There is evidence that the nominate taxon and the Javan fishing cat are distinguishable by skull morphometrics" is unbroachable to anyone who is not an expert in taxonomy. Please take time to address these concerns before nominating the article again, and please refrain from re-nominating any article so quickly without making substantive improvements after a quickfail. Fritzmann (message me) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Stop assuming and look at the article history. Wolverine XI 15:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- This is the comparison I viewed. Aside from the infections section, one sentence on hunting has been added and three sentences on human interactions have been added. These do not adequately fill the content gaps identified in the last two reviews. I was not assuming, and I did look at the article history. Please do not remove GA reviews from the article's talk page. Fritzmann (message me) 17:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Stop assuming and look at the article history. Wolverine XI 15:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)