| Revision as of 17:59, 13 December 2023 editTagishsimon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers81,201 edits {{ping|PD Slessor}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:42, 13 December 2023 edit undoPD Slessor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users661 edits →Rizwan Sajan: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| ::] (]) 07:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC) | ::] (]) 07:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
| ::::May I say - civilly, {{ping|PD Slessor}} - that you are a complete and utter fucking idiot. 1) I did not propose this deletion 2) I spoke in favour of more thought being put into keeping the article. Now off you pop to ANI with your arrant stupidity. --] (]) 17:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC) | ::::May I say - civilly, {{ping|PD Slessor}} - that you are a complete and utter fucking idiot. 1) I did not propose this deletion 2) I spoke in favour of more thought being put into keeping the article. Now off you pop to ANI with your arrant stupidity. --] (]) 17:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I meant to tag the @], not you @]. No need for ANI, if you look at the nominator, you will see the history I mentioned. I meant to mention your comment about nominator, but it was lost in translation. Don't worry, I like getting bitten. I did make a mistake. Complete and utter fucking idiot though? Maybe. Perhaps if I was somewhat smart i'd start an ANI, and cry, pointing out how you bit the poor little new comer, using language and demeanor that if every Wikipedian used, would make Brittanica feel justified for comparing Wiki community to a "public bathroom." Anyways, my apologies for the confusion, and I forgive your biting. No hard feelings. ] (]) 19:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''': BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Lots of brief, vanilla, promo bios, interviews and mentions, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the '''subject directly and indepth'''. BLPs require strong sourcing. Keep votes provide no sources or guidelines to eval. <span style="font-family:Courier;"><b> // ] :: ] </b></span> 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC) | *'''Delete''': BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Lots of brief, vanilla, promo bios, interviews and mentions, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the '''subject directly and indepth'''. BLPs require strong sourcing. Keep votes provide no sources or guidelines to eval. <span style="font-family:Courier;"><b> // ] :: ] </b></span> 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:42, 13 December 2023
Rizwan Sajan
AfDs for this article:- Articles for deletion/Rizwan Sajan
- Articles for deletion/Rizwan Sajan (2nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Rizwan Sajan (3rd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Rizwan Sajan (4th nomination)
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Rizwan Sajan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In principle, wealth, revenue, and other size metrics do not make one notable. Possibly paid editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ InstaMalik (talk • contribs)
- comment Paid editing is not a reason for deletion. Although wealth, revenue, and other size metrics do not make one notable, the article seems to have lots of citations to sources which appear to be about the subject. It would be helpful if you could analyse those. Are they not about the subject? Are they not independent? For what reason do they not evidence WP:GNG? --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Article fails WP:GNG. DJ InstaMalik (talk) 13:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, United Arab Emirates, and Maharashtra. Spiderone 17:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- So a newly created account on same day with only 3 edits, that too only on this single article commenting here? Seems you are intentionally targeting this article. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 11:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:ANYBIO. Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm also contributing on Wiki from a long time, so I have little bit idea about the things and criteria for creating a Wiki article. It's not about his wealth or revenue, it's about his recognition by the UAE government, Forbes. (Citations given in article).
- Almost sources are independent, still you think that I need to work more on this then I'm looking forward for your guidance on this. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 11:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Tagishsimon iVickyChoudhary (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Even the second account who placed {{Undisclosed paid}} tag, that user also has 5 edits only, seems fishy. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 11:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 18:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC)- Keep - Rizwan Sajan satisfies the notability criteria for biographies as outlined in WP:BIO due to significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources (WP:RS) such as Arabian Business, Gulf News. His entrepreneurial activities and leadership roles within the Danube Group are well-documented, and his involvement in notable projects and philanthropic efforts has been recognized by reputable awards (WP:ANYBIO). The subject's impact on the business sector in the UAE is further corroborated by coverage in Forbes Middle East, (Staff) establishing his notability within the context of WP:GNG. The article should be retained and can be improved by incorporating additional secondary sources that meet WP:V and WP:NPOV. Upon further investigation, the nominator seems to have almost no experience with wikipedia. In fact, @Tagishsimon edit history shows only deletion nominations, and what seems to possibly be vandalism by tagging. and nominating. Nominator makes this AfD suspicious. May take to Ani. These do not seem like WP:Goodfaith edits.
- PD Slessor (talk) 07:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- May I say - civilly, @PD Slessor: - that you are a complete and utter fucking idiot. 1) I did not propose this deletion 2) I spoke in favour of more thought being put into keeping the article. Now off you pop to ANI with your arrant stupidity. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- I meant to tag the @DJ InstaMalik, not you @Tagishsimon. No need for ANI, if you look at the nominator, you will see the history I mentioned. I meant to mention your comment about nominator, but it was lost in translation. Don't worry, I like getting bitten. I did make a mistake. Complete and utter fucking idiot though? Maybe. Perhaps if I was somewhat smart i'd start an ANI, and cry, pointing out how you bit the poor little new comer, using language and demeanor that if every Wikipedian used, would make Brittanica feel justified for comparing Wiki community to a "public bathroom." Anyways, my apologies for the confusion, and I forgive your biting. No hard feelings. PD Slessor (talk) 19:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- May I say - civilly, @PD Slessor: - that you are a complete and utter fucking idiot. 1) I did not propose this deletion 2) I spoke in favour of more thought being put into keeping the article. Now off you pop to ANI with your arrant stupidity. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Lots of brief, vanilla, promo bios, interviews and mentions, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. Keep votes provide no sources or guidelines to eval. // Timothy :: talk 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)