Revision as of 23:28, 12 December 2023 editWikiOriginal-9 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers313,298 edits D← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:38, 13 December 2023 edit undoPD Slessor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users661 edits →Megan Aubale Epstein: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], ], ], and ]. ''']''' ] ] 23:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], ], ], and ]. ''']''' ] ] 23:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] (]) 23:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. ] (]) 23:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
:* '''Delete''' per nom and current status.. The article does not establish the notability of its subject per ] and ]. The references provided appear to be weak and some primary sponsored content, which do not qualify as independent, reliable sources offering significant coverage (], ]). The article resembles a promotional resume rather than an encyclopedic entry, lacking the depth and standard of coverage necessary for a standalone article. Will say, @] nom, could have been slightly better. | |||
:Reference </nowiki>] is a sponsored segment, other sources such as Bizjournals, are a trade pub, that merely mention one award. I couldn't find any other sources of notability on the subject. ] (]) 00:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:38, 13 December 2023
Megan Aubale Epstein
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Megan Aubale Epstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article for a non-notable real estate agent in the USA. All of the citations seem to be to SEO churnalism sources; reprinters of press releases. Misplaced Pages should not be an extension of an SEO operation. Tagishsimon (talk) 22:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, California, New York, and Tennessee. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and current status.. The article does not establish the notability of its subject per WP:BIO and WP:GNG. The references provided appear to be weak and some primary sponsored content, which do not qualify as independent, reliable sources offering significant coverage (WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). The article resembles a promotional resume rather than an encyclopedic entry, lacking the depth and standard of coverage necessary for a standalone article. Will say, @Tagishsimon nom, could have been slightly better.
- Reference is a sponsored segment, other sources such as Bizjournals, are a trade pub, that merely mention one award. I couldn't find any other sources of notability on the subject. PD Slessor (talk) 00:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)