| Revision as of 22:46, 12 December 2023 editArbitrarily0 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators25,367 edits Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:21, 13 December 2023 edit undoPD Slessor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users661 edits →County island: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| *'''Keep'''. This is a real and notable feature of municipal boundaries in the United States. A move to ] is probably also a good idea. ] (]) 02:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. This is a real and notable feature of municipal boundaries in the United States. A move to ] is probably also a good idea. ] (]) 02:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] <sup><b>(])</b></sup> 22:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></p> | :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] <sup><b>(])</b></sup> 22:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></p> | ||
| ::* '''Comment''' this may be a case for WP:MERGE of any verifiable content into the ] article – Seems some sources do exist </nowiki>] </nowiki>] | |||
| ::] (]) 00:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:21, 13 December 2023
County island
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- County island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page shows no source for its term, or its definition. Sources that exist are seemingly isolated to a single state and primarily a single county in said state. There is not substantial evidence of notability of the term in wide or official use outside of a small regional area. If any amount is salvageable, perhaps it should be merged as a subsection of Unincorporated community.
In addition, the page attempts to be a list page, it is woefully incomplete, uncountable, and also includes places that show no indication that they are referred to by the term, making it rather ORy. Keith D. Tyler ¶ 05:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm not seeing sources that use and define this term. JMWt (talk) 11:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- That's because phrase matching doesn't find it. One has to know what sort of books to read. This is known under the subject of "island annexation" in California law, with an extensive discussion in West's, and "town islands" in Wisconsin law, to name but two. I found you a couple of California university professors, as well. One of them is Dean McHenry. Uncle G (talk) 14:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm. Maybe the title is wrong then? JMWt (talk) 17:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- That's because phrase matching doesn't find it. One has to know what sort of books to read. This is known under the subject of "island annexation" in California law, with an extensive discussion in West's, and "town islands" in Wisconsin law, to name but two. I found you a couple of California university professors, as well. One of them is Dean McHenry. Uncle G (talk) 14:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep but probably move to a more widely known term per nom and WP:COMMONNAME. Here is an article that notes that "Twenty-three states have specific unincorporated island provisions in their annexation laws." The problem of course is that the terminology in this area is as fragmented as the law, but from an initial search I'd suggest unincorporated island (218 hits on Google Scholar, used in statutory law of at least three states). An alternative term would be municipal underbounding, but it's not quite the same thing. As a last resort this could be merged to municipal annexation in the United States, but I don't think that would be especially helpful to readers or editors. -- Visviva (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a real and notable feature of municipal boundaries in the United States. A move to unincorporated island is probably also a good idea. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 22:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)- Comment this may be a case for WP:MERGE of any verifiable content into the Unincorporated areas article – Seems some sources do exist
- PD Slessor (talk) 00:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)