Revision as of 00:28, 6 October 2023 editTechnoSquirrel69 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,026 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2023: Responded to edit requestTag: editProtectedHelper← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:03, 28 October 2023 edit undoTjuadiv2023 (talk | contribs)39 edits Update African American Studies assignment detailsTags: Reverted dashboard.wikiedu.org [2.3]Next edit → | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
I would like to add a single-sentence paragraph at the end of the "Discrimination by law enforcement" section. The added sentence would be as follows: In a study published in 2016, however, Harvard Prof. Roland Fryer found no evidence that police were more likely to shoot black suspects than white ones under similar circumstances. https://scholar.harvard.edu/fryer/publications/empirical-analysis-racial-differences-police-use-force ] (]) 19:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC) | I would like to add a single-sentence paragraph at the end of the "Discrimination by law enforcement" section. The added sentence would be as follows: In a study published in 2016, however, Harvard Prof. Roland Fryer found no evidence that police were more likely to shoot black suspects than white ones under similar circumstances. https://scholar.harvard.edu/fryer/publications/empirical-analysis-racial-differences-police-use-force ] (]) 19:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
:] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> This is not an entirely faithful representation of this source, and including this sentence would most likely create a ] against a number of other sources in the article that report quite the opposite. <span class="nowrap">—]</span> (]) 00:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | :] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> This is not an entirely faithful representation of this source, and including this sentence would most likely create a ] against a number of other sources in the article that report quite the opposite. <span class="nowrap">—]</span> (]) 00:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
==Wiki Education assignment: African American Studies== | |||
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Thomas_Jefferson_University,_East_Falls/African_American_Studies_(Fall_2023) | assignments = ] | start_date = 2023-08-22 | end_date = 2023-12-04 }} | |||
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 17:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)</span> |
Revision as of 17:03, 28 October 2023
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Race and crime in the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 23 March 2007. The result of the discussion was keep and cleanup. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 October 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence
The article Race and crime in the United States, along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, described in a 2010 Arbitration Committee case where the articulated principles included:
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. |
Do not feed the trolls! This article or its talk page has experienced trolling. The subject may be controversial or otherwise objectionable, but it is important to keep discussion on a high level. Do not get bogged down in endless debates that don't lead anywhere. Know when to deny recognition and refer to WP:PSCI, WP:FALSEBALANCE, WP:WIKIVOICE, or relevant notice-boards. Legal threats and trolling are never allowed! |
Racist dogwhistle statements in the article with no further important context to explain the statistics
It has been proven that statistics can be misused and presented in a way that makes it discriminatory and sometimes directly false when it is portreyed without context or further information.
This article has statements such as "According to the National Crime Victimization Survey in 2002, robberies with white victims and black offenders were more than 12 times more common than the opposite" without context such as institutional racism making the statistics the way they are.
Of course there's going to be more statistics filed in an area where there's more black people, which again makes the number of rapports go up. One of the main messages of defund the police is that more policing means more active policing in an area, often black areas, more police brutality and more stereotyping in politics where the solution always is to add more police in black neighborhoods, which again boost hassle and confrontations, and boost statistics.
The notion that blacks are more criminal is in the same area as race and intelligence and is misleading at best. But when statistics is paraded like this, it is basically pushing these stereotypes and is a racist dogwhistle.
Another context to keep in mind is the fact that it has been shown again and again that police have prejudice and will tend to racially profile black men. This will often lead to false arrests, and false statistics. For every topic covered, there needs to be context and explanations. Thank you for listening/reading.
Why Statistics Don’t Capture The Full Extent Of The Systemic Bias In Policing 2A01:799:1B9B:C300:81B1:8DA0:2495:32BD (talk) 00:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to add a single-sentence paragraph at the end of the "Discrimination by law enforcement" section. The added sentence would be as follows: In a study published in 2016, however, Harvard Prof. Roland Fryer found no evidence that police were more likely to shoot black suspects than white ones under similar circumstances. https://scholar.harvard.edu/fryer/publications/empirical-analysis-racial-differences-police-use-force Wumhenry1 (talk) 19:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: This is not an entirely faithful representation of this source, and including this sentence would most likely create a false balance against a number of other sources in the article that report quite the opposite. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: African American Studies
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2023 and 4 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tjuadiv2023 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Tjuadiv2023 (talk) 17:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Mid-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- Mid-importance Anthropology articles
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Mid-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Discrimination articles
- Mid-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- C-Class Black Lives Matter articles
- Mid-importance Black Lives Matter articles
- C-Class African diaspora articles
- Mid-importance African diaspora articles
- WikiProject African diaspora articles