Misplaced Pages

User talk:Werkentagen: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:57, 26 April 2023 editWerkentagen (talk | contribs)11 edits April 2023: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 21:37, 30 April 2023 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,383 edits CT alertTag: contentious topics alertNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


:I don't understand how calling a spade a spade is vandalism. Brian Dunning is a wealthy fraud and self-admitted con man who has no more scientific knowledge or training than many of the people whose claims he attempts to debunk. These schoolchildrwn were eyewitnesses to something. Is it appropriate for a white, wealthy, professional skeptic to attempt to debunk their stories by literally pulling something (a Russian booster) out of the air? Was he there? Did he see what they saw? ] (]) 02:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC) :I don't understand how calling a spade a spade is vandalism. Brian Dunning is a wealthy fraud and self-admitted con man who has no more scientific knowledge or training than many of the people whose claims he attempts to debunk. These schoolchildrwn were eyewitnesses to something. Is it appropriate for a white, wealthy, professional skeptic to attempt to debunk their stories by literally pulling something (a Russian booster) out of the air? Was he there? Did he see what they saw? ] (]) 02:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

== Introduction to contentious topics ==
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles''', a topic designated as ''']'''. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
*adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
*comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
*follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
*comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
*refrain from gaming the system.

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. ] &#124; ] 21:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC). </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first -->

Revision as of 21:37, 30 April 2023

April 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ariel School UFO incident—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TLJ7863 (talk) 02:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

I don't understand how calling a spade a spade is vandalism. Brian Dunning is a wealthy fraud and self-admitted con man who has no more scientific knowledge or training than many of the people whose claims he attempts to debunk. These schoolchildrwn were eyewitnesses to something. Is it appropriate for a white, wealthy, professional skeptic to attempt to debunk their stories by literally pulling something (a Russian booster) out of the air? Was he there? Did he see what they saw? Werkentagen (talk) 02:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Bishonen | tålk 21:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC).

User talk:Werkentagen: Difference between revisions Add topic