Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:45, 30 April 2023

1815	1878	1900	1919	1939	1945	1989	c. 2000
Russia	Russia	Russia		Soviet Union	Soviet Union	Soviet Union	Russia
		China		China	China	China	China
		United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States
British Empire	British Empire	British Empire	British Empire	United Kingdom	United Kingdom	United Kingdom	United Kingdom
France	France	France	France	France	France	France	France
Prussia	Germany	Germany		Germany
	Italy	Italy	Italy	Italy
		Japan	Japan	Japan
Austria	Austria-Hungary	Austria-Hungary
Ottoman Empire	Ottoman Empire	Ottoman Empire

List of small powers

The following is a list of countries that are described as being small powers:

•  Albania
•  Andorra
•  Angola
•  Armenia
•  Bosnia and Herzegovina
•  Bulgaria
•  Costa Rica
•  Cuba
•  Cyprus
•  Djibouti
•  Dominican Republic
•  Ecuador
•  El Salvador
•  Iceland
•  Liechtenstein
•  North Macedonia
•  Malta
•  Monaco
•  Moldova
•  Mongolia
•  Montenegro
•  San Marino
•  Slovakia
•  Slovenia
•  Somalia
•  Suriname

List of middle powers

The following is a list of countries that have been, at some point in time, considered middle powers by academics or other experts:

•  Algeria
•  Argentina
•  Australia
•  Austria
•  Bangladesh
•  Belgium
•  Bulgaria
•  Canada
•  Chile
•  Colombia
•  Croatia
•  Czech Republic
•  Denmark
•  Egypt
•  Finland
•  Greece
•  Hungary
•  Indonesia
•  Iran
•  Iraq
•  Ireland
•  Israel
•  Kazakhstan
•  Kuwait
•  Luxembourg
•  Malaysia
•  Morocco
•  Mexico
•  Netherlands
•  New Zealand
•  Nigeria
•  Norway
•  Pakistan
•  Peru
•  Philippines
•  Poland
•  Portugal
•  Qatar
•  Romania
•  Saudi Arabia
•  Serbia
•  Singapore
•  South Africa
•  South Korea
•  Spain
•  Sri Lanka
•  Sweden
•   Switzerland
•  Taiwan
•  Thailand
•  Turkey
•  United Arab Emirates
•  Venezuela
•  Vietnam

List of regional powers

Europe

Eastern Europe

•  Russia

Western Europe

•  United Kingdom
•  France
•  Germany

Southern Europe

•  Italy

North America

•  United States

South America

•  Argentina
•  Brazil

Oceania

•  Australia

Asia

East Asia

•  China
•  Japan
•  South Korea

South Asia

•  India

Southeast Asia

•  Indonesia

West Asia

•  Iran
•  Israel
•  Saudi Arabia

Africa

•  Egypt
•  Nigeria
•  South Africa

Transcontinental regional powers

•  Turkey

{{documentation|content= This template's initial visibility currently defaults to autocollapse, meaning that if there is another collapsible item on the page (a navbox, sidebar, or table with the collapsible attribute), it is hidden apart from its title bar; if not, it is fully visible.

To change this template's initial visibility, the |state= parameter may be used:

• {{List of great powers by date|state=collapsed}} will show the template collapsed, i.e. hidden apart from its title bar.
• {{List of great powers by date|state=expanded}} will show the template expanded, i.e. fully visible.

1. ^ "Great Powers". Encarta. MSN. 2008. Archived from the original on 2009-10-31. Retrieved 2008-12-20. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help) Cite error: The named reference "Encarta" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
2. ^ Fueter, Eduard (1922). World history, 1815–1920. United States of America: Harcourt, Brace and Company. pp. 25–28, 36–44. ISBN 1584770775. Cite error: The named reference "World history, 1815-1920" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
3. ^ Danilovic, Vesna. "When the Stakes Are High—Deterrence and Conflict among Major Powers", University of Michigan Press (2002), pp 27, 225–228 (PDF chapter downloads) (PDF copy).
4. ^ McCarthy, Justin (1880). A History of Our Own Times, from 1880 to the Diamond Jubilee. New York, United States of America: Harper & Brothers, Publishers. pp. 475–476. Cite error: The named reference "1880 to the Diamond Jubilee" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
5. ^ Dallin, David. The Rise of Russia in Asia. Cite error: The named reference "The Rise of Russia in Asia" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
6. ^ Harrison, M (2000) The Economics of World War II: Six Great Powers in International Comparison, Cambridge University Press.
7. ^ Louden, Robert (2007). The world we want. United States of America: Oxford University Press US. p. 187. ISBN 0195321375.
8. ^ The Superpowers: The United States, Britain and the Soviet Union – Their Responsibility for Peace (1944), written by William T.R. Fox
9. ^ Cite error: The named reference Balance of Power was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
10. ^ UW Press: Korea's Future and the Great Powers
11. ^ Sterio, Milena (2013). The right to self-determination under international law : "selfistans", secession and the rule of the great powers. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. xii (preface). ISBN 0415668182. Retrieved 13 June 2016. ("The great powers are super-sovereign states: an exclusive club of the most powerful states economically, militarily, politically and strategically. These states include veto-wielding members of the United Nations Security Council (United States, United Kingdom, France, China, and Russia), as well as economic powerhouses such as Germany, Italy and Japan.")
12. ^ Transforming Military Power since the Cold War: Britain, France, and the United States, 1991–2012. Cambridge University Press. 2013. p. 224. ISBN 1107471494. Retrieved 13 June 2016. (During the Kosovo War (1998) "...Contact Group consisting of six great powers (the United states, Russia, France, Britain, Germany and Italy).")
13. ^ Baron, Joshua (22 January 2014). Great Power Peace and American Primacy: The Origins and Future of a New International Order. United States: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 1137299487.
14. Yong Deng and Thomas G. Moore (2004) "China Views Globalization: Toward a New Great-Power Politics?" The Washington Quarterly
15. ^ MacMillan, Margaret (2003). Paris 1919. United States of America: Random House Trade. pp. 36, 306, 431. ISBN 0-375-76052-0.
16. ^ Canada Among Nations, 2004: Setting Priorities Straight. McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP. 17 January 2005. p. 85. ISBN 0773528369. Retrieved 13 June 2016. ("The United States is the sole world's superpower. France, Italy, Germany and the United Kingdom are great powers")
17. "Analyzing American Power in the Post-Cold War Era". Retrieved 2007-02-28.
18. McCourt, David (28 May 2014). Britain and World Power Since 1945: Constructing a Nation's Role in International Politics. United States of America: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 0472072218.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: year (link)
19. Chalmers, Malcolm (May 2015). "A Force for Order: Strategic Underpinnings of the Next NSS and SDSR" (PDF). Royal United Services Institute. Briefing Paper (SDSR 2015: Hard Choices Ahead): 2. While no longer a superpower (a position it lost in the 1940s), the UK remains much more than a 'middle power'.
20. Walker, William (22 September 2015). "Trident's Replacement and the Survival of the United Kingdom". International Institute for Strategic Studies, Global Politics and Strategy. 57 (5): 7–28. Retrieved 31 December 2015. Trident as a pillar of the transatlantic relationship and symbol of the UK's desire to remain a great power with global reach.
21. Kennedy, Paul (1987). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. United States of America: Random House. p. 204. ISBN 0-394-54674-1.
22. Best, Antony; Hanhimäki, Jussi; Maiolo, Joseph; Schulze, Kirsten (2008). International History of the Twentieth Century and Beyond. United States of America: Routledge. p. 9. ISBN 0415438969.
23. Wight, Martin (2002). Power Politics. United Kingdom: Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 46. ISBN 0826461743.
24. Waltz, Kenneth (1979). Theory of International Politics. United States of America: McGraw-Hill. p. 162. ISBN 0-07-554852-6.
25. "Great Powers". Encarta. MSN. 2008. Archived from the original on 2009-10-31. Retrieved 2008-12-20. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
26. ^ Small States and International Security: Europe and Beyond, Routledge, 14 March 2014, Page 130
27. ^ "Why Small Powers Also Deserve Respect". 22 November 1993. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
28. "Small States' Responses to the Great Depression: A case study of Bulgaria" (PDF). ecpr.eu. Retrieved 17 January 2018.
29. ^ Cite error: The named reference WorldBank was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
30. Dr Igor Calzada, M. B. A. (2015). "Connecting the Basque and Icelandic Cases: An Ethnographic Chronicle about Democratic Regeneration". Open Democracy. Retrieved 24 February 2016.
31. P Balík, role of small states in international organizations, 2008
32. ^ Wurst J (2006) Middle Powers Initiative Briefing Paper, GSI Archived 14 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine
33. ^ Cooper AF (1997) Niche Diplomacy - Middle Powers after the Cold War, palgrave
34. ^ Bernard Wood, 'Towards North-South Middle Power Coalitions', in Middle Power Internationalism: The North-South Dimension, edited by Cranford Pratt (Montreal, McGill-Queen's University Press, 1990).
35. Cite error: The named reference Jordaan was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
36. ^ Tobias Harris, 'Japan Accepts its "Middle-Power" Fate'. Far Eastern Economic Review Vol. 171, No. 6 (2008), p. 45: 'Japan is settling into a position as a middle power in Asia, sitting uneasily between the U.S., its security ally, and China, its most important economic partner. In this it finds itself in a situation similar to Australia, India, South Korea and the members of Asean.'
37. Yasmi Adriansyah, 'Questioning Indonesia's place in the world', Asia Times (20 September 2011): 'Countries often categorized as middle power (MP) include Australia, Canada and Japan. The reasons for this categorization are the nations' advanced political-economic stature as well as their significant contribution to international cooperation and development. India and Brazil have recently become considered middle powers because of their rise in the global arena—particularly with the emerging notion of BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China).'
38. ^ Buzan, Barry (2004). The United States and the Great Powers. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press. p. 71. ISBN 0-7456-3375-7. Cite error: The named reference "The United States and the Great Powers" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
39. Hazleton WA (2005) Middle Power Bandwagoning? Australia's Security Relationship with the United States, allacademic
40. ^ Gilley, Bruce; O'Neil, Andrew (July 8, 2014). Middle Powers and the Rise of China. Georgetown University Press. p. 30. ISBN 9781626160842.
41. ^ "A Balancing Act: The Role of Middle Powers in Contemporary Diplomacy". The Hague Center for Strategic Studies. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
42. Lauber, Volkmar (September 17, 2019). Contemporary Austrian Politics. Routledge. ISBN 9780429720987.
43. ^ Taylor, Ian (2001). Stuck in Middle GEAR: South Africa's Post-apartheid Foreign Relations. London: Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 19. ISBN 9780275972752.
44. ^ Cite error: The named reference balancing was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
45. Cite error: The named reference Solomon was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
46. ^ Inoguchi K (2002) The UN Disarmament Conference in Kyote Archived 29 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
47. Caplan G (2006) From Rwanda to Darfur: Lessons learned?, SudanTribune
48. United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations (January 1, 2005). The future of democracy in the Black Sea area: hearing before the Subcommittee on European Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session, March 8, 2005. Washington D.C.: United States Government Publishing Office. p. 25.
49. Heine J (2006) On the Manner of Practising the New Diplomacy, ISN Archived 7 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine
50. "THE UN DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE IN KYOTO". disarm.emb-japan.go.jp. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
51. Heine, Jorge. "On the Manner of Practising the New Diplomacy". The Centre for International Governance Innovation. Archived from the original on 7 October 2007. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
53. Cite error: The named reference CzechJournal was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
54. John, Ravenhill (1988). "Cycles of middle power activism: Constraint andchoice in Australian and Canadian foreign policies," (PDF). Australian Journal of International Affairs. 52 (3): 2. doi:10.1080/10357719808445259. Retrieved February 10, 2020.
55. ^ Cite error: The named reference Behringer was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
56. ^ Pratt C (1990) Middle Power Internationalism, MQUP
57. ^ Andrew F. Cooper, Agata Antkiewicz and Timothy M. Shaw, 'Lessons from/for BRICSAM about South-North Relations at the Start of the 21st Century: Economic Size Trumps All Else?', International Studies Review, Vol. 9, No. 4 (Winter, 2007), pp. 675, 687.
58. ^ Ploughshares Monitor (1997) Scrapping the Bomb: The role of middle power countries
59. Gilley, Bruce (10 September 2012). "The Rise of the Middle Powers". The New York Times Company. Retrieved 18 May 2019.
60. ^ "The Concept of Middle Power". Ohio State University. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
61. ^ I. Handel, Michael (1990). Weak States in the International System. Taylor & Francis. p. 28. ISBN 9780714640730.
62. Thanos Veremēs (1997) The Military in greek Politics "Black Rose Books"
63. Higgott RA, Cooper AF (1990) Middle Power Leadership and Coalition Building
64. ^ Jonathan H. Ping, Middle Power Statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Asia Pacific (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2005).
65. Anoushiravan Ehteshami and Raymond Hinnesbusch, Syria and Iran: Middle Power in a Penetrated Regional System (London: Routledge, 1997).
66. Samhat, Nayef H. (2000). "Middle Powers and American Foreign Policy: Lessons for Irano-U.S. Relations". Policy Studies Journal. 28 (1): 11–26. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2000.tb02013.x.
67. Ahouie M (2004) Iran Analysis Quarterly, MIT
68. Foreign Affairs Committee (2006) Iran
69. Pratt, Cranford (1990). Middle Power Internationalism: The North-South Dimension. Montreal: McGill–Queen's University Press. p. 32. ISBN 9780773507258.
70. Tonra, Ben; Ward, Eilís (2002). "Chapter 1: Ireland, Peacekeeping and Defence Policy: Challenges and Opportunities". In Murphy, Ray (ed.). Ireland in International Affairs: Interests, Institutions and Identities. Dublin, Republic of Ireland: Institute of Public Administration. p. 20-21. ISBN 9781902448763.
71. Gillespie, Paul (17 January 2015). "Representing Ireland – multitasking in a multilateral world". The Irish Times. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
72. Ishizuka, Katsumi (23 Apr 2014). "Four: Ireland's peacekeeping policy in the post-Cold War era". Ireland and International Peacekeeping Operations 1960-2000. Routledge. p. 136. ISBN 9781135295264.
73. Bolton, Matthew; Nash, Thomas (7 May 2010). "The Role of Middle Power–NGO Coalitions in Global Policy: The Case of the Cluster Munitions Ban". Wiley. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
74. "www.lrb.co.uk".
75. "www.acronym.org.uk".
76. "Kazakhstan and the struggle over Central Asia". Spectator USA. 5 June 2019.
77. Zholdasbekova, Aidar Kurmashev, Dana Akhmedyanova, Houman Sadri, Akbota (1 October 2018). "Kazakhstan's Middle Power Response to Terrorism". Insight Turkey – via www.insightturkey.com.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
78. Middle Power Internationalism: The North-South Dimension, edited by Cranford Pratt (Montreal, McGill-Queen's University Press, 1990).
79. ^ Mace G, Belanger L (1999) The Americas in Transition: The Contours of Regionalism (p 153)
80. Kim R. Nossal and Richard Stubbs, 'Mahathir's Malaysia: An Emerging Middle Power?' in Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers After the Cold War, edited by Andrew F. Cooper (London: Macmillan, 1997).
81. "Morocco's Contemporary Diplomacy as a Middle Power". JIA SIPA. 10 August 2019.
82. Louis Belanger and Gordon Mace, 'Middle Powers and Regionalism in the Americas: The Cases of Argentina and Mexico', in Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers After the Cold War, edited by Andrew F. Cooper (London: Macmillan, 1997).
83. ^ Pierre G. Goad, 'Middle Powers to the Rescue?', Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 163, No. 24 (2000), p. 69.
84. Pellicer O (2006) Mexico – a Reluctant Middle Power?, FES
85. Cite error: The named reference MPI was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
86. Barry Buzan (2004). The United States and the great powers: world politics in the twenty-first century. Polity. pp. 71, 99. ISBN 978-0-7456-3374-9. Retrieved 27 December 2011.
87. McKercher, B. J. C. (2012). Routledge Handbook of Diplomacy and Statecraft. Routledge. ISBN 9781136664366. a Middle Power like Peru lack the diplomatic and other resources...
88. ^ Jonathan H. Ping Middle Power Statecraft (p 104)
89. Cite error: The named reference spero was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
90. Kirton J (2006) Harper’s Foreign Policy Success?
91. ^ according to Yves Lacoste, Géopolitique, Larousse, 2009,p. 134, both Spain and Portugal exert a real influence in Africa and in the Americas.
92. Cooper, Andrew F. "Middle Powers: Squeezed out or Adaptive?". Public Diplomacy Magazine. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
93. Kamrava, Mehran. "Mediation and Qatari Foreign Policy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 October 2013. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
94. Turkish Policy Quarterly, Volume 4. Turkey: Big Art. 2005.
95. Wood, Bernald (June 1, 1988). The middle powers and the general interest. Ottawa: The North-South Institute. ISBN 9780920494813.
96. "Kawaguchi asks Saudi Arabia to put pressure on Iraq Japan Policy & Politics". findarticles.com. Archived from the original on 23 October 2007.
97. "Saudi Surprise". web.archive.org. 26 August 2004.
98. "Middle Powers,Norms, and Balancing: ROK's and ASEAN's Normative Balancing against Rising China" (PDF). Chung-Ang University. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
99. de Swielande, Tanguy Struye; Vandamme, Dorothée; Walton, Dorothée; Wilkins, Thomas (2018). "Chapter 14: The Singapore paradox: The "little red dot" as a "middle power"". In Peng Er, Lam (ed.). Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asian Century: New Theories, New Cases. Routledge. ISBN 9780429873843.
100. Gladys Lechini, Middle Powers: IBSA and the New South-South Cooperation. NACLA Report on the Americas, Vol. 40, No. 5 (2007): 28-33: 'Today, a new, more selective South-South cooperation has appeared, bringing some hope to the people of our regions. The trilateral alliance known as the India, Brazil, and South Africa Dialogue Forum, or IBSA, exemplifies the trend … The three member countries face the same problems and have similar interests. All three consider themselves "middle powers" and leaders of their respective regions, yet they have also been subject to pressures from 'Emerging Middle Powers' Soft Balancing Strategy: State and Perspective of the IBSA Dialogue Forum. Hamburg: GIGA, 2007.
101. Peter Vale, 'South Africa: Understanding the Upstairs and the Downstairs', in Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers After the Cold War, edited by Andrew F. Cooper (London: Macmillan, 1997).
102. Janis Van Der Westhuizen, 'South Africa's Emergence as a Middle Power', Third World Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3 (1998), pp. 435-455.
103. Pfister R (2006) The Apartheid Republuc and African States Archived 12 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine, H-Net
104. Eduard Jordaan, 'Barking at the Big Dogs: South Africa's Foreign Policy Towards the Middle East', Round Table, Vol. 97, No. 397 (2008), pp. 547-549.
105. Flemes, Daniel, Emerging Middle Powers' Soft Balancing Strategy: State and Perspectives of the IBSA Dialogue Forum (1 August 2007). GIGA Working Paper No. 57. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1007692
106. Armstrong DF (1997) South Korea's foreign policy in the post-Cold War era: A middle power perspective Archived 20 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
107. Gilbert Rozman, 'South Korea and Sino-Japanese Rivalry: A Middle Power's Options Within the East Asia Core Triangle', Pacific Review, Vol. 20, No. 2 (2007), pp. 197-220.
108. Woosang Kim, 'Korea as a Middle Power in Northeast Asian Security, in The United States and Northeast Asia: Debates, Issues, and New Order, edited by G. John Ikenbgerry and Chung-in Moon (Lantham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008).
109. Sheridan, Greg (27 November 2008). "The plucky country and the lucky country draw closer". The Australian. Archived from the original on 12 September 2012.
110. Rudengren J, Gisle P, Brann K (1995) Middle Power Clout: Sweden And The Development Banks Archived 22 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine
111. "South African Foreign Policy and Middle Power Leadership - Fairy God-mother, Hegemon or Partner? In Search of a South African Foreign Policy - Monograph No 13, 1997". web.archive.org. 26 April 2015.
112. Jacobs, Bruce (22 January 2016). "Taiwan signals its readiness to join the world's democratic powers". the sydney morning herald. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
113. Meltem Myftyler and Myberra Yyksel, 'Turkey: A Middle Power in the New Order', in Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers After the Cold War, edited by Andrew F. Cooper (London: Macmillan, 1997).
114. Laipson, Ellen (3 September 2014). "The UAE and Egypt's New Frontier in Libya". The National Interest. Retrieved 26 October 2014.
115. Evans, Gareth (29 June 2011). "Middle Power Diplomacy". Retrieved 26 October 2014.
116. Flemes, Dr Daniel (March 28, 2013). Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers. Ashgate Publishing. p. 189. ISBN 9781409499725.
117. "Middle Powers, Joining Together: The Case of Vietnam and Australia".
118. ^ "Secondary regional powers in Huntington's view include Great Britain, Ukraine, Japan, South Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Argentina." See Tom Nierop, "The Clash of Civilisations," in The Territorial Factor, edited by Gertjan Dijkink and Hans Knippenberg (Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA, 2001), p. 61.
119. ^ Samuel P. Huntington, "Culture, Power, and Democracy," in Globalization, Power, and Democracy, edited by Marc Plattner and Aleksander Smolar (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000), p. 6.
120. "France, Germany, Britain – Responses of Traditional Regional Powers to Rising Regions and Rivals" (PDF). giga-hamburg.de. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
121. ^ www.aims.ca Archived 21 July 2006 at the Wayback Machine
122. ^ "www.csbaonline.org/4Publications/PubLibrary/R.20000200.Transforming_Ameri/R.20000200.Transforming_Ameri.php". csbaonline.org. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
123. ""Regional Powers React to Proposed US Invasion of Iraq"". globalpolicy.org. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
124. "tspace.library.utoronto.ca" (PDF). utoronto.ca. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
125. Gabriele Abbondanza, Italy as a Regional Power: the African Context from National Unification to the Present Day (Rome: Aracne, 2016)
126. "Operation Alba may be considered one of the most important instances in which Italy has acted as a regional power, taking the lead in executing a technically and politically coherent and determined strategy." See Federiga Bindi, Italy and the European Union (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2011), p. 171.
127. "Italy plays a prominent role in European and global military, cultural and diplomatic affairs. The country's European political, social and economic influence make it a major regional power." See Italy: Justice System and National Police Handbook, Vol. 1 (Washington, D.C.: International Business Publications, 2009), p. 9.
128. "L'Italie : un destin européen". ladocumentationfrancaise.fr. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
129. "Chinese Cyber Information Profusion". internationalpolicydigest.org. 17 April 2012. Archived from the original on 2 June 2013. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
130. "Argentina has been the leading military and economic power in the Southern Cone in the Twentieth Century." See Michael Morris, "The Srait of Magellan," in International Straits of the World, edited by Gerard Mangone (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishes, 1988), p. 63.
131. "The US has created a foundation upon which the regional powers, especially Argentina and Brazil, can developed their own rules for further managing regional relations." See David Lake, "Regional Hierarchies," in Globalising the Regional, edited by Rick Fawn (UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009), p. 55.
132. "The southern cone of South America, including Argentina and Brazil, the two regional powers, has recently become a pluralistic security community." See Emanuel Adler and Patricia Greve, "Overlapping regional mechanisms of security governance," in Globalising the Regional, edited by Rick Fawn (UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009), p. 78.
133. " notably by linking the Southern Cone's rival regional powers, Brazil and Argentina." See Alejandra Ruiz-Dana, Peter Goldschag, Edmundo Claro and Hernan Blanco, "Regional integration, trade and conflicts in Latin America," in Regional Trade Integration and Conflict Resolution, edited by Shaheen Rafi Khan (New York: Routledge, 2009), p. 18.
134. ""The driving force behind the adoption of the MERCOSUR agreement was similar to that of the establishment of the EU: the hope of limiting the possibilities of traditional military hostility between the major regional powers, Brazil and Argentina." See Anestis Papadopoulos, The International Dimension of EU Competition Law and Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 283.
135. Arnson, Cynthia; Sotero, Paulo. "Brazil as a Regional Power: Views from the Hemisphere" (PDF). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Retrieved 16 April 2012.
136. De Lima, Maria Regina Soares; Hirst, Monica. "Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities" (PDF). Chatham House. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 November 2012. Retrieved 16 April 2012.
137. Wigell, Mikael (19 May 2011). "Assertive Brazil, an emerging power and its implications" (PDF). Finnish Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved 16 April 2012.
138. Flemes, Daniel. "Brazil's strategic options in a multi-regional world order" (PDF). German Institute of Global and Area Studies. Retrieved 16 April 2012.
139. Schenoni, Luis. "Unveiling the South American Balance". Estudos Internacionais V. 2 N. 2 Jul-Dez 2015 P. 215-232. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
140. "Australia as an Asia-Pacific Regional Power: Friendships in Flux? (Hardback) - Routledge". routledge.com. 12 September 2007. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
141. "Should Australia Think Big or Small in Foreign Policy?". foreignminister.gov.au. Archived from the original on 1 June 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
142. "Living With The Giants - TIME". Time. 18 April 2005. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
143. "China: Global/Regional Power 2006". au.af.mil. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
144. "CNN In-Depth Specials - Visions of China - Asian Superpower: Regional 'godfather' or local bully?". cnn.com. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
145. "Correspondents Report - China: paramount power in South East Asia". abc.net.au. 21 May 2006. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
146. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 31 August 2007. Retrieved 23 May 2007.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) www.aseanfocus.com
147. ^ U.S. Policy to Asia for Regional Powers in New Science and Technology: China, Russia, Japan and Korea with Nuclear Potential, allacademic.com
148. Holliday, IAN (2006). "Japan and the Myanmar Stalemate: Regional Power and Resolution of a Regional Problem| Japanese Journal of Political Science | Cambridge Core". Japanese Journal of Political Science. 6 (3): 393. doi:10.1017/S1468109905001969.
149. "South Korea: A Major Regional Power" (PDF). Journal of Sociology. Retrieved 5 July 2017.
150. ^ Buzan & Wæver, Regions and Powers (2003, p. 55)
151. Perkovich, George. "Is India a Major Power?" (PDF). The Washington Quarterly (27.1 Winter 2003–04). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2008. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
152. Dilip Mohite (Spring 1993). "Swords and Ploughshares- India: The Fourth Great Power?". Vol. 7, No. 3. Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security (ACDIS). Archived from the original on 1 September 2006. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
153. Emmers, Ralf. "Regional hegemonies and the exercise of power in Southeast Asia: A study of Indonesia and Vietnam" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 17 March 2004. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
154. ""Iran is a strong regional power, in a far better shape than Pakistan because f its economic capabilities, rich mineral and energy resources, and internal stability, added to its far greater geostrategic importance." In Hooman Peimani, Nuclear Proliferation in the Indian Subcontinent (Westport: Praeger Publishers, 2000), p. 30.
155. "The Eight Great Powers of 2017 - The American Interest". The American Interest. 24 January 2017. Retrieved 25 November 2017.
156. Haaretz (1 March 2016). "Israel May Be Eighth-ranked in Global Power, but It's Really Not Much Fun". Haaretz. Retrieved 25 November 2017.
157. Butenschøn, Nils A. (1992). "Israel as a Regional Great Power: Paradoxes of Regional Alienation". Regional Great Powers in International Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. pp. 95–119. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-12661-3_5. ISBN 9781349126637.
158. "FindArticles.com | CBSi". findarticles.com. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
159. "Saudi Surprise". 26 August 2004. Archived from the original on 26 August 2004. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
160. Ana Belén Soage Antepazo (8 December 2012). "Saudi Arabia. A Regional Power Facing Increasing Challenges". Retrieved 24 August 2019.
161. Anoushiravan Ehteshami (28 September 2018). "Saudi Arabia as a Resurgent Regional Power". The International Spectator. 53 (4): 75–94. doi:10.1080/03932729.2018.1507722.
162. Cite error: The named reference po was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
163. "United States Department of Defense". www.defenselink.mil. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
164. Efraim Inbar (5 June 2006). "Mubarak's game". Archived from the original (doc) on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
165. Lynch, David A. (16 August 2010). Trade and Globalization: An Introduction to Regional Trade Agreements. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 9780742566903.
166. Flemes, Daniel (2010). Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 9780754679127.
167. www.iss.co.za Archived 12 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine
168. "Southern Africa is home to the other of sub-Saharan Africa's regional powers: South Africa. South Africa is more than just a regional power; it is by far the most developed and economically powerful country in Africa, and now it is able to use that influence in Africa more than during the days of apartheid (white rule), when it was ostracized." See David Lynch, Trade and Globalization (Lanham, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010), p. 51.
169. Buzan, Barry (15 October 2004). The United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Wiley. ISBN 9780745633749. Retrieved 4 April 2018 – via Google Books.
170. "Turkey and Russia on the Rise". Stratfor. 17 March 2009. Archived from the original on 23 August 2011. Retrieved 21 August 2011.
171. "Can Turkey Be a Source of Stability in the Middle East?". heptagonpost.com. 18 December 2010. Archived from the original on 13 June 2011. Retrieved 16 May 2011.
172. "The Economist: "Turkish foreign policy: Ottoman dreamer", 5 November 2011". The Economist. 5 November 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
173. "The Economist: "Turkey in the Balkans: The good old days?", 5 November 2011". The Economist. 5 November 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
174. "Erdoğan's Moment", cover story in the Time magazine issue of 21–28 November 2011. (Vol. 178 No. 21.) "Erdoğan's Way" was the cover title in the editions of Europe, Asia and South Pacific.

Cite error: There are <ref group=nb> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=nb}} template (see the help page).

• Templates that generate named references