Template:Did you know nominations/Werrington, Staffordshire: Difference between revisions

< Template:Did you know nominations Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 10:30, 5 April 2021 editEchetusXe (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers133,440 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:54, 11 April 2021 edit undoJoseph2302 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users80,441 edits reviewed and commented on this nominationTag: citing a blog or free web host Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:
	::*Yes that's much better, thank you. ]] 10:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)		::*Yes that's much better, thank you. ]] 10:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

			:*Full review:
			:* ]<span style="display:none">Y</span><!--template:tick--> Article has been 5x expanded according to DYKcheck, is long enough (7950 characters), and article is within policy
			:* {{question mark\|10}} Hook is short enough and interesting. But is a ]? It's a page hosted on a blog site
			:* ]<span style="display:none">Y</span><!--template:tick--> QPQ done
			:* {{question mark\|10}} The image is freely licenced (UK has freedom of panorama), and looks good at low resolution. However, DYK says that images must be used in the article- this can be achieved by adding it to the article either as another image, or replacing the other article in the infobox
			:* ] Overall, the article looks decent, just a couple of issues to resolve. ]] (] 14:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

	{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->		{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 14:54, 11 April 2021

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewer instructions Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count Reviewers' template Hook length

Werrington, Staffordshire

(

)

The windmill at Werrington

... that the windmill in Werrington was built to grind corn but later converted to grind coal into briquettes? Source: "Towards the end of its life it was used for the grinding of coal to make briquette." (Werrington etc and Wetley Moor also Werrington Shortly after the start of The Millennium)

Reviewed: Claude Callegari
Comment: Perhaps the telecommunications tower has ruined the view of the windmill in this picture

5x expanded by EchetusXe (talk). Self-nominated at 23:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC).

The windmill at Werrington

Not a review but perhaps this is a better photo to illustrate the mill? - Dumelow (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes that's much better, thank you. Echetus Xe 10:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Full review:
Y Article has been 5x expanded according to DYKcheck, is long enough (7950 characters), and article is within policy
? Hook is short enough and interesting. But is a reliable source? It's a page hosted on a blog site
Y QPQ done
? The image is freely licenced (UK has freedom of panorama), and looks good at low resolution. However, DYK says that images must be used in the article- this can be achieved by adding it to the article either as another image, or replacing the other article in the infobox
Overall, the article looks decent, just a couple of issues to resolve. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:

Pending DYK nominations