| Revision as of 18:35, 4 November 2006 editKingjeff (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users87,419 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:01, 4 November 2006 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators126,457 edits RevertsNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| ==Vandalism== | ==Vandalism== | ||
| It's a bad faith nomination. ] 18:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | It's a bad faith nomination. ] 18:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Reverts == | |||
| I've read your comment 'his expectation looks quite different, in his own words .' Given the AMA case is about your over use of the revert function, I would suggest you discontinue edit warring on this page. Thanks, ] 19:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:01, 4 November 2006
User talk:Panarjedde/Warnings and blocks
Your edits
You must really love edit wars. You got yourself into one now. Kingjeff 18:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
I've noticed you haven't made any recent changes to them other then the edits from your little edit war with me. Kingjeff 18:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- You should always be polite with other wikipedians. Comments such this are not welcome, and do not help solving issues.--Panarjedde 15:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- I do to the ones that don't cause me any problems. Kingjeff 19:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
It's a bad faith nomination. Kingjeff 18:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Reverts
I've read your comment 'his expectation looks quite different, in his own words maybe we'll be able to make him banned.' Given the AMA case is about your over use of the revert function, I would suggest you discontinue edit warring on this page. Thanks, Addhoc 19:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)