Revision as of 00:20, 8 October 2006 editKhoikhoi (talk | contribs)71,605 editsm →Parties' agreement to mediate: strike-out sockpuppet← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:14, 10 October 2006 edit undoGuanaco (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,306 edits →Transnistrian referendum, 2006: acceptNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Transnistrian referendum, 2006== | ==Transnistrian referendum, 2006== | ||
{{Accepted case}} | |||
<div class="plainlinks" style="text-align: right; font-size: 75%; width: 21%; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; float: right; padding: 10px;"> | <div class="plainlinks" style="text-align: right; font-size: 75%; width: 21%; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; float: right; padding: 10px;"> | ||
Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
===Decision of the Mediation Committee=== | ===Decision of the Mediation Committee=== | ||
*'''Accept''': | |||
*'''Accept/Reject/Extend''': Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.) | |||
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' |
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' —]] 04:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
<!-- Do not remove this category. It is essential to the case management bot. --> | <!-- Do not remove this category. It is essential to the case management bot. --> |
Revision as of 04:14, 10 October 2006
Transnistrian referendum, 2006
This request has been accepted by the Mediation Committee, and a case for this dispute will be automatically opened by MediationBot. Please do not alter this section or remove this tag until the Bot finishes opening the case. Questions may be sent to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for mediation. |
view
edit
delete
watch
Filed: 11:01, October 4 2006 (UTC)
Involved parties
- MariusM (talk · contribs)
- William Mauco (talk · contribs)
- Peteris_Cedrins (talk · contribs)
- int19h (talk · contribs)
- Vecrumba (talk · contribs)
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
Issues to be mediated
- Should we include in the article the fact that: "No political party in Transnistria ask for reunification with the Republic of Moldova. Previously, Transnistrian Supreme Court banned political organisations on the ground that they are "against the state", wanting reunification with Moldova".
- Should we include in the article the fact that: "Before the referendum, 4 members of pro-moldovan NGO "Dignitas" from Slobozia were arrested by Transistrian Special Forces, but were released after few days in custody, no charges being made against them ".
Additional issues to be mediated
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree.--MariusM 11:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Agree.-- int19h 11:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Agree.--Pēteris Cedriņš 19:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Agree. Anna Planeta 19:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)- Agree.—Pēters J. Vecrumba 14:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Accept:
- For the Mediation Committee, —Guanaco 04:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)