| Revision as of 00:14, 1 October 2006 editJoeWang2 (talk | contribs)8 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 00:16, 1 October 2006 edit undoJoeWang2 (talk | contribs)8 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ns:0|B}} | {{ns:0|B}} | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| *'''Delete''': Please let this nomination stand. Bad faith? I dont think so because the last two were too quickly deleted and we did not have a good count because of it. It was said most people at first keep, and later people who see this page delete. I think the page was too quickly deleted before people really read the arguements. If you don't agree fine, but thats what I see happend. | *'''Delete''': Please let this nomination stand. Bad faith? I dont think so because the last two were too quickly deleted and we did not have a good count because of it. It was said most people at first keep, and later people who see this page delete. I think the page was too quickly deleted before people really read the arguements. If you don't agree fine, but thats what I see happend. | ||
Revision as of 00:16, 1 October 2006
- Delete: Please let this nomination stand. Bad faith? I dont think so because the last two were too quickly deleted and we did not have a good count because of it. It was said most people at first keep, and later people who see this page delete. I think the page was too quickly deleted before people really read the arguements. If you don't agree fine, but thats what I see happend.
My reason for delete is that Gore III is not a public figure, and is only on here because of his arrests or his accident. He has never been mentioned on the news otherwise, and will never be heard from again unless he gets arrested again. He would not be in a 'real' encyclopedia. Thank you.