Misplaced Pages

Category:Pseudoscience: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:03, 30 April 2016 edit172.56.16.48 (talk) Undid revision 717917575 by Hgilbert (talk)← Previous edit Revision as of 18:45, 23 July 2016 edit undoUanfala (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users65,714 edits +infobox library classificationNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox library classification |DDC= |LCC= |UDC=001.97/.98}}
{{wikt}} {{wikt}}
{{Commons cat|Pseudoscience}} {{Commons cat|Pseudoscience}}

Revision as of 18:45, 23 July 2016

Library cataloging
and classification
main topicpseudoscience
Dewey Decimal001.9 Edit this on Wikidata
Library of CongressQ172.5.P77 Edit this on Wikidata
Universal Decimal001.97/.98
About Category:Pseudoscience and related categories: This category's scope contains articles about Pseudoscience, which may be a contentious label.
Pages in this category should be moved to subcategories where applicable. This category may require frequent maintenance to avoid becoming too large. It should directly contain very few, if any, pages and should mainly contain subcategories.
The main article for this category is Pseudoscience. See also the categories Natural philosophy, Scientific folklore, Obsolete scientific theories, and Alternative medicine

Pseudoscience is a broad group of theories or assertions about the natural world that claim or appear to be scientific, but that are not accepted as scientific by the scientific community. Pseudoscience does not include most obsolete scientific or medical theories (see Category:Obsolete scientific theories), nor does it include every idea that currently lacks sufficient scientific evidence (e.g. String theory).

This category comprises well-known topics that are generally considered pseudoscientific by the scientific community (such as astrology) and topics that have very few followers and are obviously pseudoscientific (such as the modern belief in a flat Earth). The pejorative term itself is contested by various groups for various reasons. Generally speaking, if an article belongs in this category, the article's lead will contain a well-sourced statement that the subject is considered pseudoscience. For people who advocate for these subjects, see Category:Advocates of pseudoscience.

Contents

Subcategories

This category has the following 73 subcategories, out of 73 total.

 

*

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

Pages in category "Pseudoscience"

The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 475 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.

(previous page) (next page)

 

*

0–9

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

(previous page) (next page) Categories:
Category:Pseudoscience: Difference between revisions Add topic