| Revision as of 00:47, 24 July 2006 edit69.133.205.8 (talk) →Frankenlies.com← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:30, 25 December 2006 edit undoHooperbloob (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,615 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :Its not an unreasonable source at all. It is the aforementioned blog that is unreasonable. The left continues to cite this outdated link, which frankenlies.com has already debunked, thoroughly, right here: http://frankenlies.com/lies/blogger.htm | :Its not an unreasonable source at all. It is the aforementioned blog that is unreasonable. The left continues to cite this outdated link, which frankenlies.com has already debunked, thoroughly, right here: http://frankenlies.com/lies/blogger.htm | ||
| ==Foreword== | |||
| So who wrote the forward to the book? | |||
Revision as of 08:30, 25 December 2006
Frankenlies.com
Frankenlies.com is an extremely poor, unreasonable source. http://frankenlies.blogspot.com/ If this were anything but Misplaced Pages, I wouldn't hesitate to remove it entirely. Lucidish 00:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- Its not an unreasonable source at all. It is the aforementioned blog that is unreasonable. The left continues to cite this outdated link, which frankenlies.com has already debunked, thoroughly, right here: http://frankenlies.com/lies/blogger.htm
Foreword
So who wrote the forward to the book?