Misplaced Pages

Talk:2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:58, 22 October 2014 editACanadianToker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,121 edits May need a rename← Previous edit Revision as of 19:02, 22 October 2014 edit undoACanadianToker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,121 edits Identification of weapons used: new sectionNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:
:: Please then link the correct source, your current one still has it as unconfirmed.] (]) 18:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC) :: Please then link the correct source, your current one still has it as unconfirmed.] (]) 18:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
:::The soldier's death has been confirmed, unfortunately. ] (]) 18:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC) :::The soldier's death has been confirmed, unfortunately. ] (]) 18:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

== Identification of weapons used ==

In media I have heard varied reports ranging from double-barreled shotgun to rifle to long-gun (long-gun is a class of firearms according to Canadian law, not all long rifles are long guns...) I have added the citation needed tag to the statement re. the double barreled shotgun. We need RS to say whether in fact there was a double barreled shotgun, rifle or combination of the two (RS still unsure as to # of shooters). - A Canadian Toker (]) 19:02, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:02, 22 October 2014

WikiProject iconCanada Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconOttawa Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ottawa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ottawa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OttawaWikipedia:WikiProject OttawaTemplate:WikiProject OttawaOttawa
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

May need a rename

W/ three seperate incidents reported, the current title may not be sufficient. But wait to see how this gets covered in sources. Might be simpler as "2014 Ottawa shooting attack" (pending on who's behind this). --MASEM (t) 16:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

The article has been moved by User:RGloucester to "2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa". I have issues with this. First, it uses an indefinite article ("an"), which is against WP:NAME. Second, listing multiple shooting locations (forcing the use of a comma) is also unnecessary; we can limit it to one general location. I would suggest a new name that uses one general location (e.g. Ottawa) and places it before "shootings" (e.g. "2014 Ottawa shootings"). Please discuss potential new names here so we can come to consensus. --Natural RX 17:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
I would use "2014 Ottawa shootings attacks" as there where multiple incidents. Avion365 (talk) 17:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Strongly oppose "2014 Ottawa shootings". There have been plenty of other shootings in Ottawa in 2014, I'm sure. "at" is not an article at all. It is a preposition, and is perfectly acceptable in the context of the guidelines. It isn't about "listing multiple locations". It is about clarifying the location. These shootings were at "Parliament Hill" in "Ottawa", as opposed to other Parliament Hills elsewhere. The format "Parliament Hill, Ottawa" is a standard convention for neighbourhoods in cities. RGloucester 17:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
"Plenty of other shootings in Ottawa in 2014" - do any have Misplaced Pages articles? And how about October 2014 Ottawa shootings? Whoop whoop pull up 18:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
If we're going this route, I favour "22 October 2014 Ottawa shootings". They did not cover the whole of October. Let's be WP:PRECISE. RGloucester 18:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
See title format of other articles: 2013 Los Angeles International Airport shooting; 2013 Annaberg shooting; 2013 Shanghai shooting; 2011 Tucson shooting; 2011 Mastung bus shooting; 2011 Hazara Town shooting; etc. I think this is plenty of justification for 2014 Ottawa shootings, on top of point from User:Whoop whoop pull up. Any other shootings thus far are relatively trivial to this anyway. --Natural RX 18:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
I don't agree with the titles of those articles either. Just because they exist as such doesn't mean that they should, as per WP:OTHERSTUFF. Let's try and actual follow the title criteria this time, shall we? RGloucester 18:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
I believe these article titles are in keeping with WP:NAME conventions, just because you don't agree with them, it doesn't mean they don't follow the conventions. --Natural RX 18:51, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
No need for a rename in this fluid situation - and we need to be specific the shootings were at Parliament Hill Legacypac (talk) 18:46, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Comment As it stand now this article is "2014 Shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa" I think this current title is apt and succinct. - A Canadian Toker (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
I agree. I prefer to keep the present title as both apt and succinct. RGloucester 18:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Merge the article with 2014 Ottawa Shooting and then rename the article to include the word downtown. The first shooting was not on parliament hill, it was at the War memorial. -- Kndimov (talk) 18:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The memorial near Parliament. Media is calling these events "Parliament Hill attack" or Parliament Hill shooting". "Downtown" is wrong, as the Rideau Centre thing did not actually happen. This is the longstand article. That fork has already been merged here. RGloucester 18:50, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing out the update re: Rideau Centre. So, 2014 Parliament Hill shooting(s) would be an appropriate name? --Natural RX 18:54, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
No, it would not. There are other "Parliament Hills". "Ottawa" must be specified. RGloucester 18:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Comment I agree that having Ottawa in the title is also important. Also, having downtown is unnecessary IMO. - A Canadian Toker (talk) 18:58, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Soldier's Death

There have been conflicting reports on if the soldier that was shot has died, please hold off editing the soldier's condition, other than the fact that a soldier has been shot. Misplaced Pages is not news. Avion365 (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed far and wide, including in the Police Press Conf. Also confirmed one suspect dead. Legacypac (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
As said it has now been confirmed. Reservist from Hamilton, may he RIP - A Canadian Toker (talk) 18:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Please then link the correct source, your current one still has it as unconfirmed.Avion365 (talk) 18:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
The soldier's death has been confirmed, unfortunately. 2.110.54.193 (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Identification of weapons used

In media I have heard varied reports ranging from double-barreled shotgun to rifle to long-gun (long-gun is a class of firearms according to Canadian law, not all long rifles are long guns...) I have added the citation needed tag to the statement re. the double barreled shotgun. We need RS to say whether in fact there was a double barreled shotgun, rifle or combination of the two (RS still unsure as to # of shooters). - A Canadian Toker (talk) 19:02, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa: Difference between revisions Add topic