| Revision as of 22:06, 30 October 2013 editKim Dent-Brown (talk | contribs)10,635 edits →WikiLove?: Final warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:30, 30 October 2013 edit undoSkyring (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,611 edits →WikiLove?Next edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :I'd like to think I'm on the up and up here. But I'll drop it. I trust someone will look after Collingwood26. --] (]) 06:39, 30 October 2013 (UTC) | :I'd like to think I'm on the up and up here. But I'll drop it. I trust someone will look after Collingwood26. --] (]) 06:39, 30 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::Pete, a while ago I not to post again at ], with no indication that my request had a time limit. And yet you were back there poking him with an entirely predictable response from HiLo which was (excuse my bad faith) I suspect exactly of the sort you hoped for. I have no problem with HiLo's block - indeed I'd have blocked him myself had someone not beaten me to it. But you were quite wrong to poke a stick in a place you had been politely asked to keep your stick out of. So now to be clear, please do not post again on HiLo's talk page under any circumstances. If procedure (eg notification of an ANI report) requires you to contact HiLo, get someone else to do so on your behalf. I will regard any post of yours on HiLo's page as disruptive and would block if it occurred in the future. I'm sorry to be so harsh-sounding but it seems better to be absolutely explicit as you weren't clear about my earlier, more politely worded request. ] ] 22:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC) | ::Pete, a while ago I not to post again at ], with no indication that my request had a time limit. And yet you were back there poking him with an entirely predictable response from HiLo which was (excuse my bad faith) I suspect exactly of the sort you hoped for. I have no problem with HiLo's block - indeed I'd have blocked him myself had someone not beaten me to it. But you were quite wrong to poke a stick in a place you had been politely asked to keep your stick out of. So now to be clear, please do not post again on HiLo's talk page under any circumstances. If procedure (eg notification of an ANI report) requires you to contact HiLo, get someone else to do so on your behalf. I will regard any post of yours on HiLo's page as disruptive and would block if it occurred in the future. I'm sorry to be so harsh-sounding but it seems better to be absolutely explicit as you weren't clear about my earlier, more politely worded request. ] ] 22:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::{{Thank you}} --] (]) 22:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:30, 30 October 2013
WikiLove?
Pete, I gather there is not a lot of WikiLove between you and that other editor. Are your comments going to help? If not, then I'd advise to drop it. – S. Rich (talk) 06:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'd like to think I'm on the up and up here. But I'll drop it. I trust someone will look after Collingwood26. --Pete (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Pete, a while ago I asked you not to post again at HiLo's talk page, with no indication that my request had a time limit. And yet you were back there poking him with an entirely predictable response from HiLo which was (excuse my bad faith) I suspect exactly of the sort you hoped for. I have no problem with HiLo's block - indeed I'd have blocked him myself had someone not beaten me to it. But you were quite wrong to poke a stick in a place you had been politely asked to keep your stick out of. So now to be clear, please do not post again on HiLo's talk page under any circumstances. If procedure (eg notification of an ANI report) requires you to contact HiLo, get someone else to do so on your behalf. I will regard any post of yours on HiLo's page as disruptive and would block if it occurred in the future. I'm sorry to be so harsh-sounding but it seems better to be absolutely explicit as you weren't clear about my earlier, more politely worded request. Kim Dent-Brown 22:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you --Pete (talk) 22:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Pete, a while ago I asked you not to post again at HiLo's talk page, with no indication that my request had a time limit. And yet you were back there poking him with an entirely predictable response from HiLo which was (excuse my bad faith) I suspect exactly of the sort you hoped for. I have no problem with HiLo's block - indeed I'd have blocked him myself had someone not beaten me to it. But you were quite wrong to poke a stick in a place you had been politely asked to keep your stick out of. So now to be clear, please do not post again on HiLo's talk page under any circumstances. If procedure (eg notification of an ANI report) requires you to contact HiLo, get someone else to do so on your behalf. I will regard any post of yours on HiLo's page as disruptive and would block if it occurred in the future. I'm sorry to be so harsh-sounding but it seems better to be absolutely explicit as you weren't clear about my earlier, more politely worded request. Kim Dent-Brown 22:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)