Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
== Re: Your edits appear to violate our LGBT Guidelines ==
Wow, we’re being really over-sensitive now, aren’t we? I’m not on any kind of “agenda” to out trans people. In fact, I had completely forgotten about the Douglas→Nicole Hamilton issue under the recent Bradley Manning news reminded me of it. I feel that clarity for the reader should always come before political correctness, a view with which you do not, unfortunately, agree. As a small step toward clarity, I have taken the liberty of copying the cited footnote (cite-note-3) in its entirety from the ] article replacing the reference to it in the ] article. This will not only be easier for readers to see, but will not break if the footnote gets renumbered. I hope you do not consider this a pert of some nefarious “agenda.”
] (]) 13:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Revision as of 13:41, 26 August 2013
The Editor's Barnstar
for being so clear eyed, consistent, and even in tone while working on the whole Deluna page/umpteen socks investigation. Good work!Tao2911 (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
