Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration | Requests Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:07, 22 January 2013 view sourceTagremover (talk | contribs)4,797 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 12:41, 22 January 2013 view source Tagremover (talk | contribs)4,797 edits Tagremover disputes: thanksNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}}
== Tagremover disputes == == Tagremover disputes ==
'''Initiated by ''' ] (]) '''at''' 11:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


=== Involved parties === === Involved parties ===
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> <!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator -->
*{{userlinks|Tagremover}}, ''filing party'' *{{userlinks|Tagremover}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|username2}} *{{userlinks|Blackmane}}
*{{userlinks|username3}} *{{userlinks|Thumperward}}
*{{userlinks|username4}} *{{userlinks|The Bushranger}}
*{{userlinks|Marteau}}
*{{userlinks|Andros 1337}}
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> <!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. -->


;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request ;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> <!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
*
*Diff. 1
*
*Diff. 2
*
*
*


;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried ;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> <!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration -->
*
*Link 1
*
*Link 2
*
*
*

=== Statement by {Party 1} === === Statement by {Party 1} ===
I am absolutely desperate. I have been the main editor mostly of technology related articles since many years, first as IP. As i am a scientist, i think my contributions mainly to articles were valuable. English is not my mother-language.

I had two blocks: One for edit-war at ], where the other editor was blocked, too: Somehow understandable.

A second recently: For Edit war/ tag removal at ], where a user requested a reference about the exact definition of the "Super": There is and never will be such an definition, as there is no clear definition for ] or ], see ]. I was blocked without getting heard: Without discussion. My reason: ]: to improve Misplaced Pages.

At recent incidents of the ] i posted an original research on the talk page: to start an discussion. I used a bold language, as the consequences calculated by me were serious, and later events and analysts joined my results. But this was the main fault: Other editors regarded me as: Anti-Boeing.

I was taken to ANI: , done some article edits and posted detailed reasons, why 3 sentences should be changed. First sentence is solved, a second has a proposal.

Its got worse at ANI, and i see questionable valuations, even from admins. I see in this case a problem of minority editors, and had some support.

Actual details at ANI ] and ].

I see highly questionable statements and valuations at ANI, even from admins. '''I have no intention that other parties get blocked'''. But i see a high probability i am blocked for questionable reasons and valuations.

I am sorry to occupy your time, but i see in this case a problem of minority editors.

If i am getting blocked or topic banned, i will leave Misplaced Pages for ever. ] (]) 12:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


=== Statement by {Party 2} === === Statement by {Party 2} ===


=== Statement by {Party 3} === === Statement by {Party 3} ===

=== Statement by {Party 4} ===

=== Statement by {Party 5} ===

=== Statement by {Party 6} ===


=== Clerk notes === === Clerk notes ===
Line 35: Line 68:


* *
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
* ];
* ].

Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice -->

Revision as of 12:41, 22 January 2013

Requests for arbitration

Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests
Request name Motions Initiated Votes
Tagremover disputes   22 January 2013 {{{votes}}}
Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests
Request name Motions  Case Posted
Amendment request: American politics 2 none (orig. case) 15 January 2025
Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

Shortcuts

About this page

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.


File an arbitration request


Guidance on participation and word limits

Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.

  • Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
  • In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
  • Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
  • Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing clerks-l@lists.wikimedia.org. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
    • Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
  • Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
  • Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using ~~~~).
  • Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
  • Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
  • Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.

General guidance

  • This page is for statements, not discussion.
  • Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, e.g. off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
  • Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
  • Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
  • After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
  • Declined case requests are logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

Tagremover disputes

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Statement by {Party 1}

I am absolutely desperate. I have been the main editor mostly of technology related articles since many years, first as IP. As i am a scientist, i think my contributions mainly to articles were valuable. English is not my mother-language.

I had two blocks: One for edit-war at Fisheye lens, where the other editor was blocked, too: Somehow understandable.

A second recently: For Edit war/ tag removal at Superzoom, where a user requested a reference about the exact definition of the "Super": There is and never will be such an definition, as there is no clear definition for ship or boat, see Talk:Superzoom. I was blocked without getting heard: Without discussion. My reason: WP:Ignore all rules: to improve Misplaced Pages.

At recent incidents of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner i posted an original research on the talk page: to start an discussion. I used a bold language, as the consequences calculated by me were serious, and later events and analysts joined my results. But this was the main fault: Other editors regarded me as: Anti-Boeing.

I was taken to ANI: , done some article edits and posted detailed reasons, why 3 sentences should be changed. First sentence is solved, a second has a proposal.

Its got worse at ANI, and i see questionable valuations, even from admins. I see in this case a problem of minority editors, and had some support.

Actual details at ANI ] and Talk:Boeing_787_Dreamliner.

I see highly questionable statements and valuations at ANI, even from admins. I have no intention that other parties get blocked. But i see a high probability i am blocked for questionable reasons and valuations.

I am sorry to occupy your time, but i see in this case a problem of minority editors.Where is help for editors if the majority of editors is somewhat biased?

If i am getting blocked or topic banned, i will leave Misplaced Pages for ever. Tagremover (talk) 12:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Statement by {Party 2}

Statement by {Party 3}

Statement by {Party 4}

Statement by {Party 5}

Statement by {Party 6}

Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Tagremover disputes: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0>-Tagremover_disputes">

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Tagremover disputes and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks,

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions Add topic