Revision as of 11:07, 22 January 2013 view sourceTagremover (talk | contribs)4,797 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:41, 22 January 2013 view source Tagremover (talk | contribs)4,797 edits →Tagremover disputes: thanksNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | ||
== Tagremover disputes == | == Tagremover disputes == | ||
⚫ | |||
=== Involved parties === | === Involved parties === | ||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> | <!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> | ||
*{{userlinks|Tagremover}}, ''filing party'' | *{{userlinks|Tagremover}}, ''filing party'' | ||
*{{userlinks| |
*{{userlinks|Blackmane}} | ||
*{{userlinks| |
*{{userlinks|Thumperward}} | ||
*{{userlinks| |
*{{userlinks|The Bushranger}} | ||
*{{userlinks|Marteau}} | |||
*{{userlinks|Andros 1337}} | |||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> | <!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> | ||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | ;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | ||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> | <!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> | ||
* | |||
*Diff. 1 | |||
* | |||
*Diff. 2 | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | ;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | ||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | <!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | ||
* | |||
*Link 1 | |||
* | |||
*Link 2 | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
=== Statement by {Party 1} === | === Statement by {Party 1} === | ||
I am absolutely desperate. I have been the main editor mostly of technology related articles since many years, first as IP. As i am a scientist, i think my contributions mainly to articles were valuable. English is not my mother-language. | |||
I had two blocks: One for edit-war at ], where the other editor was blocked, too: Somehow understandable. | |||
A second recently: For Edit war/ tag removal at ], where a user requested a reference about the exact definition of the "Super": There is and never will be such an definition, as there is no clear definition for ] or ], see ]. I was blocked without getting heard: Without discussion. My reason: ]: to improve Misplaced Pages. | |||
At recent incidents of the ] i posted an original research on the talk page: to start an discussion. I used a bold language, as the consequences calculated by me were serious, and later events and analysts joined my results. But this was the main fault: Other editors regarded me as: Anti-Boeing. | |||
I was taken to ANI: , done some article edits and posted detailed reasons, why 3 sentences should be changed. First sentence is solved, a second has a proposal. | |||
Its got worse at ANI, and i see questionable valuations, even from admins. I see in this case a problem of minority editors, and had some support. | |||
Actual details at ANI ] and ]. | |||
I see highly questionable statements and valuations at ANI, even from admins. '''I have no intention that other parties get blocked'''. But i see a high probability i am blocked for questionable reasons and valuations. | |||
I am sorry to occupy your time, but i see in this case a problem of minority editors. | |||
⚫ | If i am getting blocked or topic banned, i will leave Misplaced Pages for ever. ] (]) 12:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
=== Statement by {Party 2} === | === Statement by {Party 2} === | ||
=== Statement by {Party 3} === | === Statement by {Party 3} === | ||
=== Statement by {Party 4} === | |||
=== Statement by {Party 5} === | |||
=== Statement by {Party 6} === | |||
=== Clerk notes === | === Clerk notes === | ||
Line 35: | Line 68: | ||
* | * | ||
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
* ]; | |||
* ]. | |||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> |
Revision as of 12:41, 22 January 2013
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Tagremover disputes | 22 January 2013 | {{{votes}}} |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsRequest name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: American politics 2 | none | (orig. case) | 15 January 2025 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Tagremover disputes
Involved parties
- Tagremover (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Blackmane (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Thumperward (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- The Bushranger (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Marteau (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Andros 1337 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
Statement by {Party 1}
I am absolutely desperate. I have been the main editor mostly of technology related articles since many years, first as IP. As i am a scientist, i think my contributions mainly to articles were valuable. English is not my mother-language.
I had two blocks: One for edit-war at Fisheye lens, where the other editor was blocked, too: Somehow understandable.
A second recently: For Edit war/ tag removal at Superzoom, where a user requested a reference about the exact definition of the "Super": There is and never will be such an definition, as there is no clear definition for ship or boat, see Talk:Superzoom. I was blocked without getting heard: Without discussion. My reason: WP:Ignore all rules: to improve Misplaced Pages.
At recent incidents of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner i posted an original research on the talk page: to start an discussion. I used a bold language, as the consequences calculated by me were serious, and later events and analysts joined my results. But this was the main fault: Other editors regarded me as: Anti-Boeing.
I was taken to ANI: , done some article edits and posted detailed reasons, why 3 sentences should be changed. First sentence is solved, a second has a proposal.
Its got worse at ANI, and i see questionable valuations, even from admins. I see in this case a problem of minority editors, and had some support.
Actual details at ANI ] and Talk:Boeing_787_Dreamliner.
I see highly questionable statements and valuations at ANI, even from admins. I have no intention that other parties get blocked. But i see a high probability i am blocked for questionable reasons and valuations.
I am sorry to occupy your time, but i see in this case a problem of minority editors.Where is help for editors if the majority of editors is somewhat biased?
If i am getting blocked or topic banned, i will leave Misplaced Pages for ever. Tagremover (talk) 12:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Statement by {Party 2}
Statement by {Party 3}
Statement by {Party 4}
Statement by {Party 5}
Statement by {Party 6}
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Tagremover disputes: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0>-Tagremover_disputes">
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Tagremover disputes and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,