Revision as of 17:41, 17 December 2012 editMangoe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users34,910 edits →Arbcom case: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:57, 17 December 2012 edit undoMangoe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users34,910 edits →Arbcom case: hopefully you won't have to say muchNext edit → | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> | Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> | ||
I've included you as a participant because you were one of those who are listed as having brought on the RfC, but if you want to beg off I won't object. ] (]) 17:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC) | I've included you as a participant because you were one of those who are listed as having brought on the RfC, but if you want to beg off I won't object. ] (]) 17:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I'm hoping we can get through this without having to repeat every word of the RfC and that most of the evidence to be presented can be read there. ] (]) 17:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:57, 17 December 2012
Archives |
Karoly Sandor
Hi, and thank you for your message.
Here are two links where you can see Sandor listed as a Right Winger: http://www.footballdatabase.eu/football.joueurs.karoly.sandor.32290.en.html http://www.worldfootball.net/spieler_profil/karoly-sandor/
I've seen footage of Sandor playing and he definitely was a right winger, very short and crafty with the ball.
All the best! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baron Zbimg (talk • contribs) 16:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE
Would you have a word with this editor, I couldn't find an appropriate warning template. A serious failure of WP:BEFORE see here, it may avoid similar nominations. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 06:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- It certainly was, thank you. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 09:10, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Huh?
? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PortlandOregon97217 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Oh ok
And thank you for droning on further. I am now thoroughly ammused by your power trip, Way to over assert yourself. PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 09:20, 17 December 2012 (UTC) I am just amused by the system. Why does someone have to come to someone else and tell them to do something. Then the person comes to me. Why the process? It's the Internet. It's not like sending a repo man to do the dirty work in real life. Theres no danger. And you can tell that person to not be afraid to take the initiative. PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 09:33, 17 December 2012 (UTC) In regards to someone complaining about my referring that non notable article to the garbage bin. Why did they have to have you come and parade over and post on my talk page? I thought wikipedia was all do it yourself type stuff. I understand how people like to glorify and drag out the small things in life that they are good at. So kudos to you for finding your niche! PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 09:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Ok. I'll see what I can do. Oh, and I am absolutely flabbergasted that you didn't cite some obscure policy. Or perhaps the US constitution even. Regards PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 10:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Mark Redshaw
Was wondering how to proceed, really. The two AfDs (AfD#1, AfD#2) and this WT:FOOTY discussion clearly show Mr Redshaw to have been the long-term victim of hype and/or fantasy both on and off Misplaced Pages, and hence the dangers of relying on nothing but stats databases and sources not independent of the subject. He does appear to have made one genuine appearance in the Greek second tier for Ethnikos Piraeus, which makes him technically notable, more's the pity. But RS independent both of the subject and of each other show he never played league football for Ethnikos Achna or Real Murcia Imperial, made only one appearance for Ethnikos Piraeus, and scored only 4 league goals from (probably) 9 league appearances for Stirling Lions. I also can't find any independent RS to show him ever at Triestina, though he might have been, or at LA Galaxy.
Would you recommend starting the article again from scratch, only including what can be genuinely verified? or just removing the stats and leaving the clubs, despite the fact that his being at several of the clubs can't be verified other than from the sources that published the incorrect stats?
For examples: the Cyprus FA confirm no Redshaw played for Ethnikos Achna in the 2008/09 season; BDfutbol confirms no Redshaw appeared for Murcia B (= Imperial) in 2009/10, and in the WT:FOOTY discussion linked above, I pointed out that at the time, there was no Redshaw in the B team's squad list on Real Murcia's website. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- And here's one I prepared earlier. Talking of sources, you may not have noticed this. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:23, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Johor Darul Takzim FC
Don't know how many times this club's name has been changed in only some weeks, so it could be something fishy is "afoot". What is your opinion?
Speaking of that Malaysian ballclub, vandalism continues in Daniel Güiza. Cheers. --AL (talk) 16:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Arbcom case
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#SchuminWeb and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, I've included you as a participant because you were one of those who are listed as having brought on the RfC, but if you want to beg off I won't object. Mangoe (talk) 17:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'm hoping we can get through this without having to repeat every word of the RfC and that most of the evidence to be presented can be read there. Mangoe (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC)