| Revision as of 05:11, 21 April 2012 editとある白い猫 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 edits →20 April 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:02, 21 April 2012 edit undoMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,096 edits Marking as closedNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{SPI case status}} | {{SPI case status|close}} | ||
| <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|완젬스}} | {{SPIarchive notice|완젬스}} | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | ;Suspected sockpuppets | ||
| * {{checkip|1=67.77.174.6}} | * {{checkip|1=67.77.174.6}} | ||
| Line 31: | Line 29: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
| *CU does not connect an IP to an account. Moreover, it is clear what's going on. I'm not an SPI clerk and I'm certainly not an expert, but it seems to me there's nothing more to do here. ] (]) 00:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC) | *CU does not connect an IP to an account. Moreover, it is clear what's going on. I'm not an SPI clerk and I'm certainly not an expert, but it seems to me there's nothing more to do here. ] (]) 00:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Marking as closed as a rather useless request. Even if the IP and 완젬스 are the same, there is no purpose of blocking an IP that has not edited in over 4 months. All the other issues mentioned above are being appropriately (though not necessary maturely IMO) discussed at ANI. --] 22:02, 21 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 21 April 2012
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
완젬스
완젬스 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/완젬스/Archive.
20 April 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 67.77.174.6 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Evidence "stolen" form Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User promoting a movement
This users activity seems to be a part of a broader campaigning reminiscent of the similar cases such as the US Congress staff edits or lobbyist activity.
- Edit summary is rather revealing: "antisemitism is OUR PROBLEM not yours (which is deservedly giving us a bad rap, but occutards are insufficiently intelligent to know not to talk negatilvely about Jews until OWS gets our antisemitism stigma back under control)"
- Content just gets better: "There is a slew of policies such as fringe/undue weight/original research/verifiability/BLP/etc. which create a buffer zone of sorts to bog down the impetus of passionate editors such as yourself. It's just this way because of an election year, and after Nov 6th 2012 I will actually be the first person to reinsert the antisemitism stuff because it's inevitably the right thing to do. Thanks for your continued patience, tacit cooperation, and implicit understanding."
- User_talk:Gandydancer#A_brownie_for_you.21
- Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject OWS#The_Jew_problem_on_facebook
-- A Certain White Cat 21:02, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- The request here is NOT to connect the username with the IP address. The request is to look for sockpuppet activity. IP is provided as an info. -- A Certain White Cat 05:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
67.___.___.____ was my ip address. When I created a username in October, I didn't know how to move the talk page comments to my new talk page (with keeping the timestamps & edit history intact) so I just created a redirect back to my original talk page so that there would not be a loss in continuity. 완젬스 (talk) 22:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
(also for purposes of clarity--an admin moved my talk page earlier today from 67.___.____.____ to user talk:완젬스--I only got a username after a large edit history already--which I thought was more than 100 edits but now I'm not so sure--I thought I began editing before September)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- CU does not connect an IP to an account. Moreover, it is clear what's going on. I'm not an SPI clerk and I'm certainly not an expert, but it seems to me there's nothing more to do here. Drmies (talk) 00:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Marking as closed as a rather useless request. Even if the IP and 완젬스 are the same, there is no purpose of blocking an IP that has not edited in over 4 months. All the other issues mentioned above are being appropriately (though not necessary maturely IMO) discussed at ANI. --MuZemike 22:02, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Categories: