Revision as of 23:20, 4 July 2011 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,301 edits fix font← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:52, 8 July 2011 edit undoBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,301 edits why we bother, no one knowsNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<div style="font-family:Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 9px; padding-bottom: 3px; padding-left: 29px; padding-right: 9px; width: 95% ;float: center; background-color: #000000; font-size: 115%"> | <div style="font-family:Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 9px; padding-bottom: 3px; padding-left: 29px; padding-right: 9px; width: 95% ;float: center; background-color: #000000; font-size: 115%"> | ||
{{User:Black Kite/Navigation}} | {{User:Black Kite/Navigation}} | ||
<div style="font-family:Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 9px; padding-bottom: 3px; padding-left: 9px; padding-right: 9px; width: 95% ;float: center; background-color: #B90000; font-size: 85%"><font color="White"><center> |
<div style="font-family:Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 9px; padding-bottom: 3px; padding-left: 9px; padding-right: 9px; width: 95% ;float: center; background-color: #B90000; font-size: 85%"><font color="White"><center>Breaking News: ArbCom decides to out itself as bunch of idiots and enable copyright violators; yet does not explain why the word "Free" should not now be removed from top left hand part of page ] In other news, flaming torches and cotton bedsheets are selling well.<div style="margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 1px; padding-bottom: 1px; padding-left: 9px; padding-right: 9px; width: 95%; background-color: #B90000; font-size: 70%; font-family: arial, 'BankGothic Md BT', 'Tw Cen MT', Verdana;"></center><br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<b><center><font color="Black">Talk Page archives:<br>2007:]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]<br/>2008:]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]<br>2009:]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]<br>2010:]-]-]-]-]-]-]<br>2011:]</b> | <b><center><font color="Black">Talk Page archives:<br>2007:]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]<br/>2008:]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]<br>2009:]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]-]<br>2010:]-]-]-]-]-]-]<br>2011:]</b> |
Revision as of 22:52, 8 July 2011
2007:01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08
2008:09-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19
2009:20-21-22-23-24-25-26-27-28
2010:29-30-31-32-33-34-35
2011:36
King & King
Would like your opinion of this article. This short article has 2 non-free images. NFCC 3a? – Lionel 00:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- No, I think that's probably OK because the second image is clearly important to the article. One could argue that the image could be replaced by text describing it, but I think with such a well-sourced section the usage is acceptable. Black Kite (t) (c) 07:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)