| Revision as of 05:35, 28 May 2010 editWildhartlivie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,910 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Cher. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:58, 28 May 2010 edit undoWildhartlivie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,910 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| == May 2010 == | == May 2010 == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''I gave you ample opportunity to respond at the talk page and you have persisted and don't even bother to post a reason in the edit summary. I am reporting you to the same administrator who semi-protected the article to consider your behavior on this article. Desist. '' ] (]) 05:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''I gave you ample opportunity to respond at the talk page and you have persisted and don't even bother to post a reason in the edit summary. I am reporting you to the same administrator who semi-protected the article to consider your behavior on this article. Desist. '' ] (]) 05:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| {{uw-3RR}} ] (]) 06:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:58, 28 May 2010
Hello from Nick
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ~ thesublime514 • talk • sign 21:03, April 8, 2007 (UTC)
Cher
Oh, hi. I see you did return. I've commented in that ANI thread about Cher and have glossed the talk page discussion. If you would like to see your edits incorporated into the article, it will require yet more discussion and patience. Reverting everything back and forth is not helpful, by anyone. The best route forward is likely to be item-by-item, so consider that approach. The English Misplaced Pages can be a nasty place; we call it the Toxic Wiki. But things can be worked out of all seek the appropriate outcome. Cheers, Jack Merridew 20:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Dude, please stop removing the article content on Cher. You are now removing it without bothering to offer an explanation. Please try to grasp that Cher had separate contracts for Warner Bros. UK and for Warner Bros. US. They are not the same, she contracted with one branch and then contracted with the other. Please try to grasp that there is no valid rationale for removing her artist's link at Warner Bros. website and there is no valid rationale for removing her offically saactioned fan club site. ou are obstinately refusing to further discuss it and you just stopped responding although you failed to give proper rationale for your POV. This has to stop, it is improper to remove valid content and if you do not desist from the removal, we weill go right back to the 3RR noticeboard. The only reason you weren't blocked for the initial edits was because it wasn't possible since your IP is dynamic. It would be regrettable for you to end up blocked when all you are doing at this point is continuing to edit war for your POV version. STOP so you don't end up reported again.
May 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cher. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. I gave you ample opportunity to respond at the talk page and you have persisted and don't even bother to post a reason in the edit summary. I am reporting you to the same administrator who semi-protected the article to consider your behavior on this article. Desist. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)