Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Lanternix: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:03, 16 February 2010 editNuclearWarfare (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,665 edits →Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: endorse← Previous edit Revision as of 20:04, 16 February 2010 edit undoQvxz9173 (talk | contribs)152 editsm →Lanternix Miss-simworld: new sectionNext edit →
Line 46: Line 46:
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> <!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##-->
*{{Endorse}}. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC) *{{Endorse}}. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

----

== Lanternix Miss-simworld ==


===== <big>Report date February 16 2010, 20:04 (UTC)</big>=====

{{SPIcat}}

<!-- Please do not add a header here -->

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>======
* {{checkuser|1=Miss-simworld}}
<!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>======
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##-->
These users Lanternix and Miss-simworld have a long history of vandalising the Christian Arab article. The user Lanternix has made 75 edits and Miss-simworld made 115 edits. . Evidence they support the same agenda: . The user Miss-simworld has made numerous unconstructive edits in support of this agenda:
'''Unsourced Deletion Vandalism:'''

'''Unsourced POV Edits'''

'''Other'''

The user Lanternix has made similiar unconstructive edits (which are very numerous and the following is just a sample):

The user Lanternix has been dormant for 2 months are recently return to execute a series of unconstructive edits in support of Miss-simworld. Lanternix is the older account. --] (]) 20:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

{{RFCU|B}}

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>======
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small>


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>======


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======
{{RFCU| CODE LETTER | No2ndletter | New }} &nbsp;&nbsp; <small>Requested by ] (]) 20:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC) </small>
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##-->
<!--## Codeletters are:
A - arbcom ban/remedy evasion
B - Ongoing serious pattern vandalism
C - Vote fraud, please wait until after vote closes
D - 3RR with socks
E - Evasion of community based bans or blocks
F - Other, please explain why a check should be run -->
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##-->



---- ----

Revision as of 20:04, 16 February 2010

Lanternix

Lanternix (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lanternix/Archive.


Report date February 16 2010, 19:15 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Nableezy

Lanternix has long attempted to remove any mention of Egyptian Christians from the article Arab Christians. Currently the user has been edit-warring to remove Egyptian Christians from the list of populations in the article. The IP has come to carry on an edit war that Lanternix began. Lanternix has been blocked for sockpuppetry in related disputes and the account itself bears a strong resemblance to the banned account User:Zerida. However, these IPs traces to mobile wireless providers, so this may not conclusively show a relation if Lanternix sticks to logging in on a land line. I think the behavior pretty clearly shows the IP is used by Lanternix, but a CU to see if there is anything more definitive may be warranted. nableezy - 19:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Lanternix, I have never accused Miss simmworld of anything, please do not lie. And you have been caught using socks to further edit-wars with other users, it would shock me if these IPs were not you just based on how quickly the reverted after your reversion. Though I do think there may be no technical confirmation of the IPs as I think you were using a mobile phone to make these edits. Wouldnt hurt to check though. nableezy - 19:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Hardly, but if you wish to request a CU feel free to open a case page. nableezy - 19:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I am accusing you of using the above IPs. Where have they been shown to be other people? nableezy - 19:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
See your block log, particularly the last block by Yellow Monkey. nableezy - 20:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Funny how everytime someone disagrees with the user above, he accuses them of sockpuppetry! That same user accused another user, namely User:Miss-simworld, of sockpuppetry on the talk page Talk:Arab Christians and Arabic-speaking Christians. He also accused another user before called Zerida of being a sockpuppet of myself, also simply because that user disagreed with him. This user attitude clearly relies on intimidation of the opposing party rather than on any kind of civil behavior. I will not defend myself here, because I have no doubt that the investigations will prove I am innocent. On the other hand, I request that this user be strongly reprimended and warned for his intimidating behavior! --Ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ 19:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Also, using the same logic as the above user, please investigate the relationship of user:Qvxz9173 with the above user, since they seem to be always making the exact same edits! --Ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ 19:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
The sockpuppets you are accusing me of being were eventually proven tp be other people. Do your homework properly. --Ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ 19:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
My comment was in regard to that statement of yours: "you have been caught using socks to further edit-wars with other users". Got it now? --Ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ 19:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: D (3RR using socks )
Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by Nableezy 19:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Lanternix Miss-simworld

Report date February 16 2010, 20:04 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Qvxz9173

These users Lanternix and Miss-simworld have a long history of vandalising the Christian Arab article. The user Lanternix has made 75 edits and Miss-simworld made 115 edits. . Evidence they support the same agenda: . The user Miss-simworld has made numerous unconstructive edits in support of this agenda: Unsourced Deletion Vandalism:

Unsourced POV Edits

Other |Only "Miss-simworld" could insert POV tags |Then adds POV Contents |Then removes POV Tag after adding POV contents

The user Lanternix has made similiar unconstructive edits (which are very numerous and the following is just a sample):

The user Lanternix has been dormant for 2 months are recently return to execute a series of unconstructive edits in support of Miss-simworld. Lanternix is the older account. --Qvxz9173 (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by Qvxz9173 (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lanternix: Difference between revisions Add topic