| Revision as of 14:33, 11 October 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Jake Wartenberg/Archive 3.← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:40, 11 October 2009 edit undoThe Rambling Man (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors286,429 edits →For your information: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
| Waiting for your signature at ]. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 06:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC) | Waiting for your signature at ]. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 06:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == For your information == | |||
| ] has reverted your closure of a thread on ] . It seemed polite to let you know. ] (]) 19:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:40, 11 October 2009
| This is Jake Wartenberg's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
- I will probably reply here.
Click here to leave me a message
 Archives | ||||||
|
||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 15 sections are present. |
 |
|---|
| 15 January 2025 |
|
- Categorize: WP:UBLP
- Check new BLPs: WP:NEWBLP
- Participate in AFDs: BLP AFDs
- Help resolve content issues: WP:BLP/N
- Monitor recent changes to BLPs: BLP watchlist
- Remove BLP vios: WP:BLPFIX, Unsourced statements, All unreferenced BLPs, BLPs lacking sources
Possible vandalism or libelous edits, as detected by edit filters 39 and 189. Removal of Category:Living people (filter 117)
Sikh Terrorism
Or Sikh extremism as it has been renamed/ or 'watered down' has serious issues of references/bias.
I will add that 2 users have had serious warnings from other admins and editors for using Misplaced Pages as a platform for radicalising articles especially Sikh Extremism, ISYF and Dabinderjit Singh. (See archived talk pages on Sikh Extremism) You can do this by analysing the history of those articles. These have been archived rapidly.
I will also add that Sinneed and Sikh-History do not WP:LIKE exposure of news about Sikh-Extremism as they wanted the article deleted as well as the news about the Austrian murders and accusations that certain journalists are right wing because they are simply Jewish and reported on Sikh Terrorism The whole article is so biased and twisted, any changes you make are followed with reversals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Sikh_extremism/Archive_1#Sikh-history
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Sikh_extremism (see parts 9,10,34)
- The point I am making here is that there is VERY selective editing by removing important information which I will point out.
- Could you please kindly take a look at this revert,
- Now, regading the Canadian award winning journalist, Kim Bolan who has had multiple death threats against her by Sikh Extremists, here you see a typical revert by Sinneed where he deleted many positive yet truthful aspects about herself (such as being an award winning journalist), surely this makes wikipedia a poor source just because a few extremists come together and lobby a poor admin who is unfamiliar with the subject matter combined with the fact that there will those who are intent on using wikipedia as a tool to propagate their own views.
- This is typical of many 'selective edits' where relevant information has been deleted
- - I will point out later, a list of these edits if you require
Please see the canvassing here between the two fundamental editors that have accused me and you seem to have fallen for the bait
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Sinneed&diff=prev&oldid=304878765
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Irbisgreif&action=edit§ion=8
File:Saio.jpg
Hi, according to the change logs, you deleted http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Saio.jpg with the comment that it already exists in Wikicommons. I'm not sure what happened, but the original photo that was uploaded was incorrect (not the one intended to be released into the common domain) and was subsequently replaced with the correct photo (mainly orange in colour). With your delete, the correct photo has now disappeared and the old, incorrect photo has come back. I have no idea how this could have happened. I've had problems removing the incorrect photo (which has been picked up in articles in other languages), but now it seems the correct photo has completely disappeared. Any suggestions how I can get the correct photo back and remove the old? Ka-ru (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- I upload that image to commons. Should be all better now. Sorry for the inconvenience. — Jake Wartenberg 20:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, much appreciated. I'm not sure if you know the answer, but do you know how I can remove the old photo? It still appears in the file history and it should not be there. Ka-ru (talk) 06:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- You can ask a commons admin to do that. I've had good interactions with PeterSymonds. — Jake Wartenberg 06:11, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, much appreciated. I'm not sure if you know the answer, but do you know how I can remove the old photo? It still appears in the file history and it should not be there. Ka-ru (talk) 06:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Roman Polanski
Re: your summary for this edit. The article content disagrees with you, strongly: In 1977, he was arrested in Los Angeles and pleaded guilty to "unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor", and this has been cited in the article. Unless you have a better reasoning here, there is little reason the article shouldn't give some mention to the criminal history the subject is infamous for in the first paragraph. --Mysidia (talk)
- That isn't the same as child molestation. — Jake Wartenberg 04:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Request for input on ANI thread
Hi Jake. Could you comment on Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:WillOakland please. I want to make sure there are no undisclosed circumstances regarding WillOakland. It looks like the account should be indefinitely blocked. Jehochman 16:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Wrt the chart of BHO-to-QEII "cousinage"
W/re the gallery in the "distant relations" section of Family of Barack Obama, each relationship cited a WP:RS. However, the reason I'm pinging your talkpage is actually not to debate this issue privately (I already know what you would argue in this regard, after all) but instead to question your coming to the article and deleting only part of this type of charting. Why did you not remove the chart illustrating the relationship between Obama and Queen Elizabeth II? Since a substantial portion of the population of the US could have a similar chart drawn, why do you believe this chart in this instance passes muster? ↜Just M E here , now 00:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ps - If you could await the result of the discussion here --> Talk:Family of Barack Obama#Gallery of distant relationships and chart of Obama's relationship to the House of Windsor -- before removing the chart (or both charts, for that matter), I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! ↜Just M E here , now 00:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Kawaks
17:18, 28 September 2009 Jake Wartenberg (talk | contribs) deleted "Kawaks" (Expired PROD, concern was: Non-notable emulator; no coverage by reliable sources.)
who're you to tell what is notable and what is not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.244.94.162 (talk) 21:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- The article was deleted through our proposed deletion process because an editor asserted that there was not significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. If you would like, I can send it to AfD for people to vote on it there, instead. — Jake Wartenberg 21:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
User talk:97.115.194.46
Hi Jake, I noticed that you recently blocked this IP for vandalism. If it's possible, could you delete its talk page and then restore it sans the first comment from the IP? There's a particularly hateful attack against the US President in the edit summary. Warmly, –Katerenka (talk • contribs) 04:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Done, though I would say this is on the mild side of things - we don't usually go to the trouble for things that are simply offensive. — Jake Wartenberg 04:55, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I appreciate you taking the time to delete/restore the page and I will try not to be so prudish in the future. :) Warmly, –Katerenka (talk • contribs) 04:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Recent Block
Regarding the edit warring block there was no diff to show an attempt to resolve through a talk page, and the warning diff was a basic vandalism warning.
In addition to this the editor who made the 3RR report was quite likely responsible for editing the article using an IP and therefore was just as responsible for edit warring as the IP user that you blocked.
Sorry, but in my opinion this was a bad block, considering the possibility of sock puppetry, the warning NOT being given, there being no attempt at discussion on the article talk page and the fact that the editor who made the report had recently been blocked for edit warring and more recently warned about edit warring .
They should both have been warned or both blocked. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on AN3 report. — Jake Wartenberg 15:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks - I hope they both calm down with the edits. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:Editnotices/Page/Power Rangers: RPM
There's still a grammatical error in the original text of the edit notice that needs fixing: articles to article.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:32, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- Got it. — Jake Wartenberg 05:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Julia Gillard
Jake, Julia Gillard is a member of the Labor Party but her electoral district is Lalor. If you click the Lalor article, you will see that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.64.45 (talk) 05:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Wikis Take Manhattan
|
This box: view • talk • edit |
WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Misplaced Pages and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City.
LAST YEAR'S EVENT
- Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Takes Manhattan/Fall 2008 (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
- Commons:Wikis Take Manhattan (our cool team galleries)
- Streetfilms: Wikis Take Manhattan (our awesome video)
WINNINGS? The first prize winning team members will get Eye-Fi Share cards, which automatically upload photos from your camera to your computer and to sites like Flickr. And there will also be cool prizes for other top scorers.
WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, October 10th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.
WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!
REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.
WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's fantastic new event space nestled between Chinatown and SoHo. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:
- 148 Lafayette Street
- between Grand & Howard Streets
FOR UPDATES
Please watchlist Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Takes Manhattan. This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.
Thanks,
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
24.196.232.201 on AIV
Could you take a look at the report on 24.196.232.201 on AIV? It seems to be overlooked in the backlog. Thanks. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 01:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Nevermind, another user took care of it as soon as I hit the "Save" button. Carry on :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 01:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
restore
Please restore the page Radio Rainbow International or explain why you removed it. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nico7323104 (talk • contribs) 11:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- There was consensus to delete it here. — Jake Wartenberg 20:43, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 04:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dabomb87 (talk) 04:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Conomination
Waiting for your signature at Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/A poilu on leave. Durova 06:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
For your information
User:Doctor Sunshine has reverted your closure of a thread on WP:AN/I here. It seemed polite to let you know. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)