| Revision as of 05:59, 29 September 2009 editJBsupreme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers30,453 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:47, 29 September 2009 edit undoSL93 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors79,236 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Delete''' Not notable, no attempt to reference it and claim notable. ] (]) 05:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Not notable, no attempt to reference it and claim notable. ] (]) 05:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' as notability is not established here. Thank god we don't have a bunch of "WP:IAR" hand wavers this time around and can delete this cleanly. ] (]) 05:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as notability is not established here. Thank god we don't have a bunch of "WP:IAR" hand wavers this time around and can delete this cleanly. ] (]) 05:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''': I can't find ] for this software. ] (]) 20:47, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:47, 29 September 2009
MyPaint
- MyPaint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We shouldn't have a consensus for deeming most FOSS as notable. No assertion of notability. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't find any reliable sources which would support this program's inclusion. I also agree that being FOSS shouldn't be taken as automagically conferring notability. Crafty (talk) 01:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - notability not established. (Verges on Speedy Delete A7: no attempt to establish notability.) - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable, no attempt to reference it and claim notable. Miami33139 (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as notability is not established here. Thank god we don't have a bunch of "WP:IAR" hand wavers this time around and can delete this cleanly. JBsupreme (talk) 05:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2009 (UTC)