Misplaced Pages

Central South Slavic diasystem: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:13, 6 August 2009 editEx13 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,157 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:59, 6 August 2009 edit undoIvan Štambuk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,292 edits rv content fork, extreme nationalist PoV, no reliable English-language sourcesNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect ]
'''Central South Slavic diasystem''' is, according to Croatian linguist ] <ref> {{hr icon}} , Zagreb, 1971</ref>, a ] ].<ref>{{hr icon}}] - ORGANIC FOUNDATIONS OF CROATIAN LANGUAGE, Composed according to the text of academics Dalibor Brozović]</ref>

It consists of the ], the ], the ] and the ].

In the history of linguistics, the term "Serbo-Croatian" was often used for this group of languages, but now is in the process of being abandoned because that term was politically compromised (it reflected the policy of violent merging of the Croatian and Serbian languages at the expense of the Croatian language).

The ], by itself, was an artificially created language.
The name was politically created and originally had no native speakers that called it that.

In socialist Yugoslavia, the Serbo-Croatian language was in fact the Serbian language, and was officially named as such in Bosnia and Hercegovina, Montenegro and Serbia. Important note: "Croatian or Serbian language" was a "lighter" version of Croatian (more internationalisms, easier to understand for Serbs), and a more "politically correct name" according to Yugoslav Communists and influential ] in Yugoslav leadership.

The term ''Central South Slavic diasystem'' was introduced by the Croatian linguist ], and was later accepted by ] (among others); among Bosniak Muslim linguists, it is accepted by Dževad Jahić (author of ''Gramatika bosanskog jezika'' <ref>{{bs icon}} Ničim izazvan uvod </ref>). On the other side, some other prominent Croatian linguists oppose to this term, such as ] member ], ] and ], first director of the Institute of Croatian Language and Linguistics.

Babić opposed this grouping because of the definition of a diasystem as: "a single genetic language which has two or more standard forms"; Babić argued in 1971 that all these languages are separate. <!-- reference to come -->

Miro Kačić opposed the grouping of these languages into a diasystem, because in his opinion the application of the term "diasystem" to a language is very questionable. He gave the following argument: "''The question is, how to determine the language as a "diasystem"? It would be easy to put all Slavic languages into the category of a diasystem (it is only a matter of criterium), so it could easily be said: Slavic language as diasystem etc.''". <ref>{{hr icon}} Miro Kačić: Zašto hrvatski ne može nikako biti hrvatskosrpski (excerpt from the book ''Jezikoslovna promišljanja'', Pergamena, Zagreb, 2001., ISBN 953-6576-12-2 </ref>

<!-- more translation from hr.wiki to be done, and I owe you more links, arguments in short etc. -->

== References ==
{{reflist}}

== External links ==
*{{pdf| Emil Heršak: Jezične strategije i društvo|292 KB}}

]
]
]
]
]

]
]
]
]

Revision as of 15:59, 6 August 2009

Redirect to:

Central South Slavic diasystem: Difference between revisions Add topic