Misplaced Pages

We all know what we can and cannot do in the War Room, correct, gentlemen?

User:MuZemike/Menu

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

This is MuZemike's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 5 days

Resident Evil

Duly taken to (this) AfD, thanks for the heads up though. - Jarry1250 22:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Badagnani RFC

Hello, MuZemike. Eugene2x (talk · contribs) files WP:Requests for comment/User conduct on Badagnani (talk · contribs). Since you've known him for his behaviors, your input on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Badagnani would appreciated. Thanks--Caspian blue 01:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Can't look at it right now, but I'll try to comment when I get a chance to sit down and look at it more closely. MuZemike 02:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of 5x5=25

I'm confused as to why you think that my article on the 5x5=25 exhibition of 1921 is worthy of deletion. You stated that "I can only find a trivial mention in a Socialist newspaper here, but nothing else. Notability not established, unless offline sources can be found." Searching on Google for "5x5=25" and "Rodchenko", for example, I find it mentioned in many articles on Constructivism in good quality newspapers, art galleries, and some journals. By searching Google Books, it also returns quite a number of results.Jimjamjak (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Add them in, then! I could be wrong. MuZemike 17:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Remember that notability is not established through one's perception of a subject, but through the amount of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources as I have mentioned before.

I quite understand that. I think that given the current recreation of this exhibition in the largest art museum in the UK, it is not just me who thinks it might be notable. I was slightly put out because I didn't feel I had been given a chance to barely start the article before it was tagged for deletion.Jimjamjak (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Also remember that if you are contesting the deletion to please remove the Proposed Deletion tags from the article. That shows that the proposed deletion has been contested. It still, however, may be sent to Articles for deletion for a community discussion. Hope that helps out more. MuZemike 17:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help here.Jimjamjak (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

AbsoluteTelnet DRV

Hi! Thanks for the additional comments on Misplaced Pages:DRV#AbsoluteTelnet. I left further comments on the DRV page regarding AbsoluteTelnet in print. I found four print sources that mention AbsoluteTelnet. Is this the kind of thing you're looking for? You said you might consider a relist if I was able to find other source material, particularly print sources. Also, could you explain to me what "this is not AFD round 2" means? I see you repeat that in a number of DRVs but I'm not sure what it means. --Brian Pence (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

"This is not AFD round 2" normally means that you're either trying to re-argue the points made at the relevant AFD or are making arguments that are normally made at AFD. DRV is different in that it is used either because the closing administrator may have made a faulty judgment in deleting (or keeping) an article at AFD or via CSD, or if new information pops up after the AFD closure which may have resulted in a different result in the AFD if presented then.

I would be for relisting it now that it looks like you have something there (I'll change appropriately on the DRV page) for notability. Hopefully, everyone else can do the same.

Hope this helps out. MuZemike 17:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

5x5=25

I see you 2nd'd a prod on 5x5=25, that prod was contested by the article's creator so it has been moved to AFD here: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/5x5=25, you may want to add your comments.

DYK for Rufus (Street Fighter)

On 27 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rufus (Street Fighter), which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

sockpuppet accusation

I am not 3rr intentionally. I add sourced content & it is reverted. I readd it. Then u all all tell me to stop. TELL REDPEN! I take the time to add content but all s/he does is revert. redpen is following me STALKING ME Elisabeth Hasselbeck Tim Hasselbeck Omarosa Carson Daly and initiating edit warring. I hvae readded my edits bc the content I add is good & sourced. I have asked for help but you all ignore me. Instead you focus on telling me to not 3rr. Look @ the CONTENT of my edits. Tell redpen to stop reverting and actually contribute in making the articles better.

Ive asked for help repeatedly & was blown off. Apparently I ll only be helped if I get an account. I dont want 1. Wiki is "the encyclopedia that any1 can edit" but apparently any1 cant get help in editing it. 70.108.102.252 (talk) 16:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you are. Way past 3RR. You keep re-adding falsified material that violates BLP. Also, Do not abbreviate Misplaced Pages as wiki! That serves only to insult others around here. You also express a patent unwillingness to be reasonable with any editor here. MuZemike 16:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)