| Revision as of 04:08, 18 January 2009 edit76.90.224.167 (talk) Point taken, not blanking statement; simply avoiding the new message box over a misunderstanding.← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:10, 18 January 2009 edit undoMikenorton (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers44,051 edits →Edits to 1906 San Francisco earthquake: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| But why do they only want to cite it after it was tagged for 2 months or longer and then they notice that I take it off, if it's something important to an article me or anyone else removing it shouldn't be what initiates a citation. | But why do they only want to cite it after it was tagged for 2 months or longer and then they notice that I take it off, if it's something important to an article me or anyone else removing it shouldn't be what initiates a citation. | ||
| == Edits to 1906 San Francisco earthquake == | |||
| Hi. You deleted what you understood to be 'challenged' statements in this article. Just to point out that it was not difficult to find sources for most of them, maybe try this yourself on another occasion, it could improve the article. | |||
| N.B You took out the first letter of General Funston's surname during one of you edits, that's now fixed. ] (]) 17:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 18 January 2009
Just letting you know that there is a discussion about your edits on the admin noticeboard here on the admin noticeboard.
As a side note the orange "you have a message" bar should disappear as soon as you visit this page. It is not necessary to blank the page to get rid of it. One approach you might consider is to log into an account for editing, and not logging in for browsing. That way you will not be bothered with messages when you are merely browsing the encyclopedia. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 10:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Before leaving me a message
I understand that people have seen me as having an attitude and referred to my discussion with Vidritas (I think that's his username) and my initial defense of my contributions I did listen. I understand that minor edits are when fixing punctuation or maybe fixing a link that is with wrong code. I do not remove fact tags with a bad intention. I understand others need time to cite something if there is a citation available.
But why do they only want to cite it after it was tagged for 2 months or longer and then they notice that I take it off, if it's something important to an article me or anyone else removing it shouldn't be what initiates a citation.
Edits to 1906 San Francisco earthquake
Hi. You deleted what you understood to be 'challenged' statements in this article. Just to point out that it was not difficult to find sources for most of them, maybe try this yourself on another occasion, it could improve the article.
N.B You took out the first letter of General Funston's surname during one of you edits, that's now fixed. Mikenorton (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)