Misplaced Pages

User talk:L'Aquatique: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:21, 23 November 2008 editJohn Vandenberg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users68,507 edits Alastair Haines: request to amend case← Previous edit Revision as of 08:12, 23 November 2008 edit undo67.58.119.227 (talk) Love and DTTR!: new sectionNext edit →
Line 159: Line 159:


Oh, did I neglect to mention that I want to thank ''everyone'' for participating? So, I'd like it to say something like "thanks to everyone who !voted, commented, or otherwise participated regardless of your stance". Thanks! &mdash;]<sup>'']''</sup> 23:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Oh, did I neglect to mention that I want to thank ''everyone'' for participating? So, I'd like it to say something like "thanks to everyone who !voted, commented, or otherwise participated regardless of your stance". Thanks! &mdash;]<sup>'']''</sup> 23:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

== Love and DTTR! ==

{{dtrr}} For the lulz. ] (]) 08:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:12, 23 November 2008

L'Aquatique is online
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Home     Talk     Contribs     Awards     Monobook     Sandbox     E-Mail



This is L'Aquatique's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to L'Aquatique.

If you leave a message here, I will reply here and leave the {{Talkback}} template on your page. If I leave a message on your talk page, I will watchlist it, so please reply there.

You can also contact me on my IRC channel, ###LAquatique (yes, there are multiple pound signs) or via e-mail at fromjuneauwithlove at gmail dot com


Reading Material!

If I deleted your page and you want to know why...

Q: Hey, you deleted my page!
A: That's entirely possible.

Q: So, what gives? I worked really hard on that.
A: Well, it could be any number of things. Because I'm a new admin, for now I restricting my use of the delete button to really obvious cases only, which in Wiki-speak we call Candidates for Speedy Deletion. There are a ton load of things that might have qualified your article for speedy deletion, but the chances are relatively high that 1.it was an attack page, or 2. it was blatant advertisement, aka Spam.

Q: What's an attack page?
A: An attack page is a page which exists solely to degrade another person. Whether this person is your sister's ex-boyfriend, your mean old English teacher, or Tom Cruise. In fact the subject of an attack page doesn't even have to be real to qualify it for speedy deletion, because the fact remains that an encyclopedia has no need for an article that consists solely of "John Doe is gay." It serves no purpose. No one, except perhaps John Doe and his partner, gives one iota that he is gay.

Q: Well, how do I know if my page was an attack page?
A: Did you create a page about a person, real or fake, and write negative things about them?

Q: I guess...
A: Then it was an attack page.

Q: But everything I wrote was true!
A: It doesn't matter. For one thing, if your article was about a non-notable topic, it was going to be deleted no matter what. Misplaced Pages is the 💕 that everyone can edit, but we do have standards regarding what subjects are suitable, and there are requirements- we don't have an article about everything possible, just articles about subjects a reasonable amount of people would care about. This is why we have articles about William Shatner, but not That Guy Who is in the Theatre Troupe in your Hometown of Barrow, Alaska, and Did a Really Good Job as Hamlet that One Time, and Jackie Kennedy but not Barack Obama's Second Cousin's Ex Roomate's Illegitimate Daughter's Secret Lesbian Lover's Toy Poodle. Of course, by this measure we probably shouldn't have an article about Paris Hilton, but two out of three ain't bad.

Q: What was the second thing?
A: What?

Q: You said "for one thing," doesn't that sort of imply that there's more?
A: Oh, of course. I got off on a bit of a rant there, didn't I?

Q: Yes, yes you did.
A: Okay, the second thing is, if the person you wrote your attack about is real and whether he or she is notable or not, unless you have actual factual verifiable references with which to back up your sources, the page will immediately be deleted as a BLP concern, because we have strict rules governing articles about real people. The Wikimedia cabal Foundation could be held legally liable if the information contained within said articles could be construed as libel.

Q: Oi vey, big Words...
A: Just be careful when you're writing about living people.

Q: Sounds fair enough. What about spam pages, what's that?
A: Spam could be one of two things: a mystery meat that I am quite sure is not Kosher, or blatant advertisement that no one wants to read. You know, the stuff that clogs your inbox day in and day out with offers for natural male enhancement, even though you are most definitely a female? Anyway,we get a lot of that on Misplaced Pages too, and most of the time it is immediately deleted, often by myself. It's one of my pet peeves.

Q: One of my pages was deleted as spam, but I didn't intentionally write it as an advertisement. Why was it deleted?
A: Most of the spammy pages are written by someone within the company trying to use Misplaced Pages as the free directory that everyone can advertise . But sometimes, editors who have no ties to the company or product just get a little over-excited and forget to adhere to our neutral point of view. It happens from time to time, especially in a world where we are taught to write as flowery as possible. You might consider reading some of our policies and you can always ask questions if you are unsure.

Q: I'm pretty sure my page was not an attack page, or an advertisement. Why else might you have deleted it?
A: It might have been any of the other criteria for speedy deletion, including patent nonsense (no salvageable content), copyright infringement, test pages, and word-for-word recreation of material deleted per a deletion discussion. To be sure, check the logs. Follow this link: Special:Log, select "Deletion Log" in the drop down menu, and then type the name of the page. The admin who deleted the page will have left a short note explaining why the page was deleted.

Q: I really think that the article could be improved, but when I recreate it, it only gets deleted again. What do I do?
A: In many (but not all) cases, I can restore it for you and move it to your userspace where you can improve upon it at your own pace. For instructions, check out the next section.


Template:Archive box collapsible


Hopiakuta

This thread will not be archived because several pages on WP:ANI link to it.

Hi - I think Hopiakuta is asking to have a phone consultation - several of his comments have obliquely talked about that, and I think that's what he's referring to when he points to your sig - the "talk to me" part. I saw him saying something similar somewhere else, and I'm finally adding it up. It's all very bizarre. I don't have the time, nor the needed background, to sort through his technical issues, but I wonder if someone might be able to step up for this. He has something to say - it's just not getting to us. Nice to meet you, by the way. Tvoz |talk 22:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi, it's nice to meet you too. I would agree that he is asking for a phone conversation... but I'm young and not all that well spoken, and I don't feel comfortable with talking to someone I don't know over the phone. Add that to the fact that I don't really feel qualified. I have experience w/ autistic and developmentally disabled people but this is, well it's very different. Parts of it do seem autistic, the problem with taking things out of context is almost aspergers-like... but I'm not getting that vibe otherwise. I just don't think I could do it justice, but I don't really know anyone who could. Maybe someone at the accessibility project? It seems that the person he connected with the most is Graham, but he seems to have stopped paying attention to the page. Maybe if we brought this back to his attention he could lend some ideas. Frankly, I'm at a loss, but I don't want to give up on this guy yet. L'Aquatique 05:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
That's how I feel too - you probably saw I brought this to AN/I initially because I just couldn't make any sense out of it and had a feeling it wasn't garden-variety vandalism, although it looked like it. I really am not the right person either - I don't have any experience and wouldn't know how to approach it - but there must be people here who can. Graham is a good idea - maybe he knows people at the accessibility project. Tvoz |talk 06:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Oooh - how come the color continued? Looks nice! Tvoz |talk 06:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
It's pretty! Okay, I'm going to bop over to Graham's talk page and tell him there's a party going on over at L'Aquatique's talk page and he better get in on it before I get too goofy (as often happens at parties, particularly Christmas ones). I am kidding of course. I just finished a six page paper for a sociology class and I'm feeling QUITE goofy already! 'Nee way... L'Aquatique
Done! I think I managed to keep the goofiness to a minimum. I try hard not to freak out people I am just meeting! : ) 'Kay, we'll see if he responds. (By the way, your signature matches this odd purpleness that has engulfed our conversation quite nicely.) L'Aquatique 06:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
(After edit conflict): Hmmm - I'm not sure how well I'd do at this - I'm a bit shy in voice communication and one of the reasons I like this place is that communication is all in text. I've been able to talk to other blind people who others considered really hard to talk to ... just saying "yep", "uh-huh", and so on did the trick as well as providing some good advice. But I'm not sure how I'd go with Hopiakuta ... he/she seems very talkative. The only person from Misplaced Pages:accessibility who I think might be able to do this is User:Rick Block. User:Theresa knott is a teacher assistant at a school who I find always has a knack of explaining things well - perhaps some of the editors at Talk:Autism maybe? I know people in RL who are good at that sort of thing but don't edit here... I wouldn't give the duty to any of them otherwise they probably wouldn't be my friends. In summary I could do it, but I'd prefer someone who is more quallified in working with developmentally disabled people. I have this page on my watchlist so reply here to keep the conversation in one place. Graham87 06:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Holy cow, that was fast. Superhero fast... hey you're not a superhero are you? That would be cool. I could tell people I met a superhero on Misplaced Pages! But alas... they would never believe me! Anyway; I hope that you have not misinterpreted my original message- in no way am I asking you to telephone him yourself! I would not ask you to do something I wouldn't do- and I know how you feel. I'm horrible at telephone conversations... I stutter all over the place and can never think of the right thing to say! (until an hour or so afterward, that is) I am much better at typing out my thoughts. Anyway, I was just hoping you might have some insight that we are missing, since he seemed to react in more a positive manner to you than others. It's late where I am and I'm just up working on this and writing to blow off steam, so I'll try to get in touch with Rick tomorrow morning and try to get his advice on the subject. Thanks for the quick reply! L'Aquatique 07:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
LOL no I was browsing WP:ANI and followed a link ... then I found I had new messages. I'd love to be a superhero ... 'twould be cool to be able to fly around. Anyways, as a last idea, have a look at my advice about a similar situation at User talk:SandyGeorgia/arch19 #AnnieTigerChucky - I was probably a bit pesamistic in that message but it is true, unless someone reaches out to him and teaches him about Misplaced Pages, he will eventually be banned. I don't want that to happen. And I always think of a comeback far too late - what in French is called L'esprit de l'escalier (stairway wit) - I wish there was a concise English term for that. Graham87 07:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, flying would definitely rock muchly. However, I think I'd prefer to be able to breathe underwater. Still, being a superhero would be scary. I don't think I have to guts to go fighting evildoers... I have trouble enough on vandal patrol! Then again, you can't move as fast underwater, so any epic battles would be pretty boring. Hee hee... 'Nee way, back to the subject at hand. I am not sure about this- I haven't been able to decipher a lot from his admittedly cryptic talk page (can't imagine what that page must sound like... maybe a very poorly tuned orchestra!) but I think he actually was banned at one point for a short time. Perhaps as an administrator you could confirm this? Frankly, while I see how it could work, I think that he may just react with the "handicappist, racist, etc" line. I'm afraid if we tried that we might push him away too far. Hmmm... By the way- love that phrase! It does seem to capture the sentiment perfectly, doesn't it? Je pense que les français comprendent l'idée de langue plus, plus mieux que nous... : ) L'Aquatique 07:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
This is his block log, which is accessible by everyone - it shows he was blocked for 24 hours and then unblocked. A link to a user's block log can be found at the top of their contributions, next to the talk page link; admins also get a block button. A block is not the same thing as a ban ... a ban is something given by the arbitration committee or by the whole community - see the banning policy. I don't actually know any French - I learnt that phrase from Chuck Palahniuk's short story "Guts", which is, um, interesting ... let's just say that the ability to breathe underwater would not have helped the main character at all to get out of his messy predicament! Graham87 08:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... It says he was blocked at around ten then unblocked at 16:00... that's only six hours, unless I'm reading it wrong. (which is completely possible- the whole 24 hour clock screws with my brain) Plus it happened almost a year ago. Looks like this guy's been a Wikipedian longer than me! Nevertheless, it seems like if he was going to learn from a block he would have learned his lesson a year ago. A ban on the other hand... I don't know. I'm not sure he would understand. Many editors have already asked him to "knock it off", making it formal probably isn't going to change things. The idea of a ban, in and of itself, isn't very concrete and I think that we need to be very clear with him or else more misunderstandings are likely to ensue. On the less serious side of this conversation, I've decided that in addition to being able to hold my breath under water and fly, I want to have a little usb port installed in my brain. Need to learn about Geological Oceanography? Easy! I just plug in this flash drive and BAM! Instant expertise! The practical applications are endless!! L'Aquatique 08:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Yup he was blocked for only six hours then unblocked by the same admin. I think the problem is that everyone has been kinda afraid to deal with him ... and to be honest I don't blame them. If he is banned he will probably start creating sockpuppets - but they will be easily recognisable because of his distinct writing style and mannerisms. I'd love a USB port in my brain ... you could find out so much info so quickly. I would only like it if only *I* could decide what gets plugged in there ... I wouldn't like someone walking by and randomly plugging a USB vacuum cleaner into my brain. Graham87 09:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree. I'm not afraid of him, but I'm a little intimidated. I'm a writer and I'm used to what I write making sense to people. He obviously isn't getting what I'm trying to tell him, and that really... I don't know what to word is. Frustrates me, I guess. Maybe that's why I don't want to give up on him. It irks me that there are so many idiots out there that will destroy without a though something other people have spent so much time working on, but here's someone who seems to have good faith, and some good ideas (if you can read past all the weirdness, he has a very dry with an is almost... poetic) and we cannot get him to understand. *Sigh*. The problem is, he will take any block or ban as an insult. Hmmm... Tvoz was talking earlier about him writing down everything that he wants to contribute in a subpage and then having that be translated into usable text by some volunteer. That's actually not a bad idea, but I'm not sure how I'd communicate that to him. Plus, we'd have to find someone to do it.
Vacuum cleaner usb ports. Who knew? I cannot help wondering who sits at their desk all day and thinks these things up. Nevertheless, if someone did walk by and plug a vacuum into your head, you could just yank it out and...retaliate...hee hee... This reminds me of when I was a kid, I programmed my computer to "scream in pain" (I just recorded myself screaming) everytime someone unplugged something from it. Ahh, the memories! L'Aquatique 18:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm - look at his his userpage on Anarchopedia where he seems to make a little more sense. I suspect he is autistic because of his perseveration on minor things - like the number of characters in his screen name. He seems to be unwilling to use the phone to talk to anyone outside the US - and I, personally, wouldn't call if I had to pay for it because the cost of international calls in Aussieland is ridiculous. Unless one of us could Skype him or something ... wasn't he using an ancient computer though? Hmmm ... on one level he makes no sense at all but on another he makes perfect sense in his own world, if you know what I mean. And lol at the USB missile launcher! Weapon of mass-distraction indeed ... Graham87 04:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

I've read through some of his posts and nearly all of them could be considered disruptive. His account history goes back to June 2006 (which is a continuation of earlier postings from an IP address). He seems to be the same user at http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/User:hopiakuta, and may not be fully comprehending the difference between wikipedia and anarchopedia. He's been tolerated here quite a long time, despite being nearly obviously disruptive. I don't have any particularly good suggestions. I've seen much less disruptive folks end up banned. He seems to at least think he has a disability of some kind, but I don't have much of clue what it might be. Harsh though it may sound, if he can't communicate through writing this might not be the best place for him.

BTW - can you fix your sig? Each "start font" (font) needs a matching "close font" (/font). This is why the font color continues after your sig. -- Rick Block (talk) 05:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. That's never been a problem before... Anyway, I'm disappointed to hear your response, but unfortunately I have to admit that you are probably right. Both of my parents are autism specialists and I spent my childhood dealing with this stuff. I guess I was just pushing for a victory here because they are so rare with this disease.
I do think it's interesting that he seems so much more coherant at Anarchopedia. I don't have any good explanations for this. Perhaps it is just a better environment for him and we should encourage him to remain there instead?
As for weapons of mass destruction distraction, I know that I would be distracted all day by that! I'd be sitting here, twiddling my thumbs and considering working... then someone would walk by I would bomb the daylights out of them! The good news is, if they were carrying something I could vacuum any messes up ASAP! : ) L'Aquatique 17:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
It seems a shame, because it would appear that disruption may not be his intent, and he has made positive contributions, if you can sort through the maze. I do think it might work in a partnering arrangement, but I don't know why anyone would volunteer for such a task. From a practical standpoint, do we just sit back and put up with it? Mentoring might be an answer - at least a mentor (or adopt-a-user, whatever it's called) might talk to him by phone and maybe get some insight into what the problem is, and perhaps recommend that this isn't the best place for him to get satisfaction from his work. This may indeed not be the best place for him, but are we going to just wait until someone blocks him for disruption? Doesn't feel right to me, but I don't have any answers either. Tvoz |talk 19:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Well, I suppose a next step could be to contact the folks over at Adopt a User and see if we could find someone with experience in these situations. There are a lot of mentors out there, I'd bet there's a least one who would be willing to take it on. L'Aquatique 19:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I wish I was able to contribute more here than I really can. I do note that we do have two editors, User:Smartyshoe and User:Gameguider, who have both expressed interest in a proposed Autism project and who both use the {{User aspie}}. One of them, or maybe one of the other editors who use that template here might be able to help. I would have no objections to trying maybe to do some work on this editor's contributions, but am more than a bit awkward on the phone myself. By the way, any way to bring back the violet print above? I wish I saw that color a lot more often around here. John Carter 20:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Okay, perhaps we could create some sort of network of people who could sift through his contributions and make them more "wikipropriate" (<- new word!). Of course we'd need to run this by him first or he'll see it as being followed around by people intent on changing his edits! I'm going to pop over to Smartyshoe and Gameguiders' talk pages and ask them to join this conversation and lend some first hand experience and advice. L'Aquatique 21:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Please see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Accessibility. John Carter 14:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm... too bad you are the only person on the list. : ( L'Aquatique 20:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I only added that section at 14:50 today. It'll take awhile for people to even know it's there. John Carter 20:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Oh, I didn't know that! Hee hee... I'll have to go add my name. L'Aquatique 21:37, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't feel comfortable talking to strangers on the phone. Sorry. Smartyllama 23:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC) (formerly smartyshoe)
I know how you feel! But would you be willing to perhaps examine the case and lend some advice? Also, you may be interested in User:Warlordjohncarter/WikiProject Accessibility... Thanks, L'Aquatique 00:03, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Sure, I will look into it. Smartyllama 00:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Good deal. Welcome to the Wikiproject! L'Aquatique 00:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi - I just saw your "talkback" was put on my user page again on Oct 9 - I saw it once that day - didn't see that it went back up (not sure why you put it back actually) - would probably be more useful, at least for me, if you put it on User Talk instead, so the "new message" announcement would be delivered. My watchlist is too huge and I'd prefer not having things put on my user page - I don't always notice them. Anyway - I did see the discussion continuing here, and wish you all well with the project - this is not my expertise, but I saw an editor who seemed to be struggling, and tried to make some sense out of it. Unfortunately it seems there are no real resources for this type of thing, and there continues to be a communication problem with this user. It may be beyond our ability to address - if anyone has any contacts at the Foundation, perhaps they would be interested in this. I'm overbooked as it is and can't do much more than an occasional interpretation if I happen to see one of his edits being misunderstood. I'll keep him on my watchlist, but can't promise more than that. Tvoz |talk 05:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

(unindent)Whoa, sorry I didn't notice your post until now. God, I'm such a space cadet at times. 'Nee way , thanks for your help and input. I understand being overbooked! Been there, done that, keep doing it. --(L'Aquatique: Bringing chaos & to the Wiki for One Year!) 08:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely no problem!! All best Tvoz |talk 16:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


Rollback

Would you consider giving me permission for rollback? HairyPerry 17:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I have a lot of vandal reverts and a lot of warnings given out as well, using the undo feature and putting revert of vandalism on the edit summary, but back to your comments. I have already tried to install twinkle and huggle in monobook and neiter one of them did anything so yeah thats where I stand, I don't think its right not to give me rollback by the way. But hey its the admins decision, not mine, I guess I'll be patient. HairyPerry 13:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, you can't install huggle in your monobook, it's an application. However, twinkle should work as long as you are installing it in the right monobook (there's two). You should be placing this text: importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js'); in your monobook.js. I'm going to try to install it for you, I want you to let me know if, after purging your cache, it works for you. If it doesn't, I would like to know what browser and operating system you are using and we'll go from there. L'Aquatique 20:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Mmmkay, it's installed. You had some weird stuff in your monobook, I'm rather surprised you weren't having more problems with your user interface. See if it works now. L'Aquatique 20:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

I didn't know what I was doing and I don't see anything extra so, I don't think it worked, ain't I supossed to have an extra tab or something? How do you even know? I don't know if its working or not because I don't know how to work it. HairyPerry 13:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

You should have one or two extra tabs at the top, yes. What browser and operating system are you using? L'Aquatique 21:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I told you I use IE so I'm probably not going to get anything. HairyPerry 00:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually, you didn't tell me you were using I.E. Firefox is a free download,it takes literally like five minutes to get it and it works thousands of times better than IE. You really should use it. If for some reason you cannot install it, you should get at least some functionality by clicking the "Preferences" link up in the corner of your window with your login information, then "gadgets", and then scroll all the way down to the bottom of the list and checking the first box in the "Library and compatibility gadgets" subheader. Save the page, purge your cache, and let me know if anything changes. L'Aquatique 20:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Well sorry I use I.E. and I'm on a school computer, so yeah I can't install Firefox and I'll try whatever you just said and see what happens and message you later. HairyPerry 13:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok I did it, now what was that supossed to do? HairyPerry 15:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

When you're viewing this page, see if there's an extra tab that says "warn". L'Aquatique 17:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

No nothing, I don't know, if I can't get nothing I can't ever be the vandal fighter I want to be. I'll just be patient and wait for things to come along. HairyPerry 17:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Article you might like to help me with, or else…

See Felix Pedro. — CharlotteWebb 12:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Dear L'Aquatique, how is your life going? It has been a long time since we last talked! AdjustShift (talk) 14:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

It's going pretty well. Writing essays, reading textbooks, you know- the usual! L'Aquatique 07:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
I find this !vote interesting. Finally we have the Alaskan cabal! :-) AdjustShift (talk) 09:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, it seems the cabal was brought forth into existence when I was sysopped, hopefully it will gain in power once Mizu also gets the bit... (muahahaha) L'Aquatique 09:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

If you're going to block an IP

at least get it right. I am *not* "Suave.sean" 75.168.214.145 (talk) 23:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Uh huh, you only come from the same IP range, post the same exact messages, and edit the same pages. I was not born yesterday, you know. L'Aquatique 23:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
You may not have been born yesterday, but you are incompetent. A net block can have *many* users. Again, so that it will sink in: I am *not* "Suave.sean". 75.168.220.28 (talk) 00:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm incompetent? You're a sockpuppet who is repeatedly identifying yourself to someone with the ability to shut you down? I got nothing on you, buddy. L'Aquatique 00:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Don't be so full of yourself, WikiBureacrat. 75.168.209.210 (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I really don't think you're in a position to be ordering other people around... but by all means continue. This is gets more amusing every time I block you. L'Aquatique 07:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
The most pathetic aspect of this is that you think I'm some user called Suave.sean, and other WikiBureacrats apparently have joined in and believe this also the case. I am *NOT* "Suave.sean". This is a great example of Misplaced Pages group think. 75.168.217.240 (talk) 13:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

"another Sauve.sean sock"?? You *are* incompetent. 75.168.213.117 (talk) 04:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Do you have another name you prefer? L'Aquatique 05:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Nope. Just stop blaming the wrong guy. "Sauve.sean", whoever he is, is *definitely* not me. 75.168.209.32 (talk) 13:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: users with Screen readers

Okey dokes. I'll be happy to help. Graham87 23:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Cool. The more the merrier, I guess ... if they learn enough, they'll be able to help other new screen reader users and so on. Graham87 01:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Gender of God

Somehow the intensity reminds me of Proposition 8 on the news... SkyWriter (Tim) (talk) 13:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't watch the news for exactly that reason. It's fricking depressing... L'Aquatique 18:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Alastair Haines

I have reset his block to 48 hours within a few minutes ago because he continued to abuse his talk page editing priveleges and removing anything left by you or myself to that page. His block prevents him from editing his own talk page for the next 48 hours.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes, apparently he had decided to "ban" us from his talk page. *sigh* Thanks for handling this. L'Aquatique 21:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Where does it say that? I must have missed it in replacing everything we've said.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
If anything needs to be discussed with me, L'Aquatique simply doesn't have to be the one to do it. In fact, she doesn't discuss, she demands, and things that are contrary to policy. It's not helpful for Wiki or for her to be involved. I've got no problem with her, and I'd like her to change. But there's simply no need to work together if she can't bring herself to do it. So I am imposing a ban on L'Aquatique at my talk page. Surely there are better things for her to do than hang around my page anyway, I'm not taking anything from her or from Wiki to do it. If she'd like things to change, she can e-mail me any time, and I'll welcome her with open arms. Alastair Haines (talk) 10:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC) L'Aquatique 21:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Ah, yes. I see that on his page now.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

I have initiated a request to amend the Alastair, hoping to introduce some new measures which will prevent further flare ups. --John Vandenberg 01:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

My thankspam template

Oh, did I neglect to mention that I want to thank everyone for participating? So, I'd like it to say something like "thanks to everyone who !voted, commented, or otherwise participated regardless of your stance". Thanks! —Mizu onna sango15 23:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Love and DTTR!

Template:Dtrr For the lulz. 67.58.119.227 (talk) 08:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk:L'Aquatique: Difference between revisions Add topic