| Revision as of 10:06, 12 June 2008 editCryptic (talk | contribs)Administrators41,750 editsm →German Goo Girls: lk RfD← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:28, 12 June 2008 edit undoB.Wind (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers15,684 edits →German Goo Girls: endorse deletionNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Since there are article for 2 Girls 1 Cup, Bangbus, Adam & Eve, and other article with such pornographic content, their should be no reason for it's deletion. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:46, 12 June 2008</small><!-- Template:Unsigned2 --> | Since there are article for 2 Girls 1 Cup, Bangbus, Adam & Eve, and other article with such pornographic content, their should be no reason for it's deletion. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:46, 12 June 2008</small><!-- Template:Unsigned2 --> | ||
| *As with all the times it's been re-created (lots!), this is going to need third-party reliable sources before an article sticks around. Like, y'know, the ] closer stated. Endorse. —] 09:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | *As with all the times it's been re-created (lots!), this is going to need third-party reliable sources before an article sticks around. Like, y'know, the ] closer stated. Endorse. —] 09:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *Considering the contentious history of both the German Goo Girls and at least one of the redirects of the same name, it would be much more prudent to start a new article within userspace, and ''then'' approach the proposition of establishing it in article space. Since the last article at that name was a redirect, it would make no sense to recreate the redirect without having the proposed, fully-formed and cited article ready to go. If this is an attempt to overturn the deletion of the redirect, I '''endorse deletion''' of it. ] (]) 10:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
Revision as of 10:28, 12 June 2008
| < June 11 | Deletion review archives: 2008 June | June 13 > |
|---|
12 June 2008
German Goo Girls
- German Goo Girls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD|RfD)
I believe that the article on German Goo Girls should be restored. Since there are article for 2 Girls 1 Cup, Bangbus, Adam & Eve, and other article with such pornographic content, their should be no reason for it's deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icanzhavegoodwiki (talk • contribs) 08:46, 12 June 2008
- As with all the times it's been re-created (lots!), this is going to need third-party reliable sources before an article sticks around. Like, y'know, the AFD closer stated. Endorse. —Cryptic 09:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Considering the contentious history of both the German Goo Girls and at least one of the redirects of the same name, it would be much more prudent to start a new article within userspace, and then approach the proposition of establishing it in article space. Since the last article at that name was a redirect, it would make no sense to recreate the redirect without having the proposed, fully-formed and cited article ready to go. If this is an attempt to overturn the deletion of the redirect, I endorse deletion of it. B.Wind (talk) 10:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
B. Scott
- B. Scott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
I am interested in restoring and re-writing the B. Scott page. I am a third party writer with an interest in providing a clear and concise page for B. Scott. I understand the need to present him as not only notable but also of interest to the GLBT and African-American communities. I have compiled a list of sources to back up all articles and will not publish anything that is not sourced. I am willing to work with an admin to make sure this page is of interest the the Misplaced Pages community.
I would like the admins to note that other "Internet Celebrities" are featured on Misplaced Pages, and as this phenomenon grows, this will continue to be the case. Of note: Michael Buckley, Chris Crocker, Tay Zonday and even The Star Wars kid have their own pages on Misplaced Pages. While some are better-written than others, each holds their own place in the lore of the Internet Celebrity phenomenon. I intend to show how B. Scott belongs in line with these celebrities.
Also, I would like to note that while the previous Articles for Deletion discussion was inundated by fans of B. Scott, this will not be the case in the future. I intend to re-write this page in a dignified manner and will continuously monitor it against any sort of problems. Thank you for your consideration. RcktManChgo (talk) 04:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Go for it. Write up a draft in your userspace and bring it here to show. If you need the old info, ask an admin for it. --UsaSatsui (talk) 07:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I would definitely like to have the old info, seeing as I had never seen what was published. I will contact an admin about restoring it. RcktManChgo (talk) 08:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)