| Revision as of 02:19, 24 February 2008 editJanetw2008 (talk | contribs)13 edits →Wettershaw Manor← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:42, 24 February 2008 edit undoEdward321 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users36,434 edits →Wettershaw Manor: so many socks it must be laundry dayNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| As a community in Shaw we have gone door to door to have people submit a rebutle to the statements of Shaw and the community and of the Wetter family that lives here. I have been given the rare oportunity to visit and see his library and the family bible that was made about 1650-1700 with entires that go back about 300years before. Really cool book to see and I am thankful that he was kind enough to show me. We hope you get swamped with rebuttals over your malicious attacks ] (]) 23:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC) | As a community in Shaw we have gone door to door to have people submit a rebutle to the statements of Shaw and the community and of the Wetter family that lives here. I have been given the rare oportunity to visit and see his library and the family bible that was made about 1650-1700 with entires that go back about 300years before. Really cool book to see and I am thankful that he was kind enough to show me. We hope you get swamped with rebuttals over your malicious attacks ] (]) 23:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC) {{spa|72.193.204.212}} | ||
| As for Wettershaw Manor not Being on the National Register of Historic Places dose not make it not a home of history. If someone would look ut up before calling everything a hoax, Its listed with the Boone county Historical scocity, and 4 othe small one i can find. | As for Wettershaw Manor not Being on the National Register of Historic Places dose not make it not a home of history. If someone would look ut up before calling everything a hoax, Its listed with the Boone county Historical scocity, and 4 othe small one i can find. | ||
| Try and look at what is being done good not at what you have not heared off, but go out and read a book on the area. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Try and look at what is being done good not at what you have not heared off, but go out and read a book on the area. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|4.245.7.70}} | ||
| * I feel the same about this site as well...Mr Brecwrewer I want to thank you for the amount of time you spent complaining about this information being put up in just one day, yet you have miraculously researched, pulled Genealogy records, church records, sensus records and read so many books and pulled the information down in the same amount of time and calling the family a hoax. To me you sound like a history HOAX, selfappointed EXPERT. I cannot believe one person to be an expert in Medieval history, European history, Renaissance history, Holy Roman Empire history, Swiss history, US history, Missrouri history, Boone County history etc. You must me a man of great importance to know so much in all these fields that most PhDs can claim to be in only one. One would think that leaving the page up for a time would have given time to have more references to be added. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | * I feel the same about this site as well...Mr Brecwrewer I want to thank you for the amount of time you spent complaining about this information being put up in just one day, yet you have miraculously researched, pulled Genealogy records, church records, sensus records and read so many books and pulled the information down in the same amount of time and calling the family a hoax. To me you sound like a history HOAX, selfappointed EXPERT. I cannot believe one person to be an expert in Medieval history, European history, Renaissance history, Holy Roman Empire history, Swiss history, US history, Missrouri history, Boone County history etc. You must me a man of great importance to know so much in all these fields that most PhDs can claim to be in only one. One would think that leaving the page up for a time would have given time to have more references to be added. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|Azsteve}} | ||
| I would like to know how a 13 year old computer 'whiz' is capable of determining that Missouri history, manor homes over 200 years old, and family trees hoaxes! Considering the difficulty in tracing much of this information via the internet, how did you come by the information to deem this fake? It can take a trained geneologist and historian months and years to trace family history, history of homes. Yet it took hours for a few people to determine all this information is a hoax. I realize WP is an encyclopedia. But it is a community based one. If people are shot down when trying to contribute, how is the content to be exanded? ] (]) 02:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC) | I would like to know how a 13 year old computer 'whiz' is capable of determining that Missouri history, manor homes over 200 years old, and family trees hoaxes! Considering the difficulty in tracing much of this information via the internet, how did you come by the information to deem this fake? It can take a trained geneologist and historian months and years to trace family history, history of homes. Yet it took hours for a few people to determine all this information is a hoax. I realize WP is an encyclopedia. But it is a community based one. If people are shot down when trying to contribute, how is the content to be exanded? ] (]) 02:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC) {{spa|Janetw2008}} | ||
| *'''Strong Delete''' Obvious hoax. ] (]) 02:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:42, 24 February 2008
Wettershaw Manor
- Wettershaw Manor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Procedural nomination only. AfD discussion transferred from Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shaw History, with which it was originally bundled See also Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hans Albrecht III for an article on a man who appears to be the owner of Wettershaw Manor and a related AfD, Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shaw History. --Eastmain (talk) 02:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 02:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment NOT on the National Register of Historic Places, for starters. May have some limited notability but there's really only primary sources connected to the B&B business and two local articles from the same newspaper. --Dhartung | Talk 03:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note. See WP:ANI#elaborate scam.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: Hoax, lie, nonsense, vandalism... take your pick of adjectives. Not real, and therefore not possessing the capacity to become useful information. Utgard Loki (talk) 18:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete blatant advertising. Also, if the place is a company, then CSDa7 ⇒SWATJester 06:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Template:DeleteVote Hoax CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
As a community in Shaw we have gone door to door to have people submit a rebutle to the statements of Shaw and the community and of the Wetter family that lives here. I have been given the rare oportunity to visit and see his library and the family bible that was made about 1650-1700 with entires that go back about 300years before. Really cool book to see and I am thankful that he was kind enough to show me. We hope you get swamped with rebuttals over your malicious attacks 72.193.204.212 (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
As for Wettershaw Manor not Being on the National Register of Historic Places dose not make it not a home of history. If someone would look ut up before calling everything a hoax, Its listed with the Boone county Historical scocity, and 4 othe small one i can find. Try and look at what is being done good not at what you have not heared off, but go out and read a book on the area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.245.7.70 (talk) 00:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- I feel the same about this site as well...Mr Brecwrewer I want to thank you for the amount of time you spent complaining about this information being put up in just one day, yet you have miraculously researched, pulled Genealogy records, church records, sensus records and read so many books and pulled the information down in the same amount of time and calling the family a hoax. To me you sound like a history HOAX, selfappointed EXPERT. I cannot believe one person to be an expert in Medieval history, European history, Renaissance history, Holy Roman Empire history, Swiss history, US history, Missrouri history, Boone County history etc. You must me a man of great importance to know so much in all these fields that most PhDs can claim to be in only one. One would think that leaving the page up for a time would have given time to have more references to be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azsteve (talk • contribs) 01:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
I would like to know how a 13 year old computer 'whiz' is capable of determining that Missouri history, manor homes over 200 years old, and family trees hoaxes! Considering the difficulty in tracing much of this information via the internet, how did you come by the information to deem this fake? It can take a trained geneologist and historian months and years to trace family history, history of homes. Yet it took hours for a few people to determine all this information is a hoax. I realize WP is an encyclopedia. But it is a community based one. If people are shot down when trying to contribute, how is the content to be exanded? Janetw2008 (talk) 02:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- Strong Delete Obvious hoax. Edward321 (talk) 02:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)