Misplaced Pages

Talk:Joseph Schlessinger: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:53, 2 December 2007 editDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits Full protect (edit war in progress): correction← Previous edit Revision as of 23:54, 2 December 2007 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits Full protect (edit war in progress): signedNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


T<s>he sexual harassment lawsuit is sourced to Chronicle of Higher Education, an altogether reliable source in the subject (supported by aq major radio station). i consider this probably sufficient documentation for BLP, assuming they are summarized correctly. I think is is ''certainly'' sufficient documentation that commenting it out was unwarranted. It is accepted that we protect what we find. I have no prior knowledge of this matter, but would think it justified only if there were a real absence of documentation. In relevant circles, the Chronicle is read more than Misplaced Pages, and certainly very much more trusted, so we would not be doing any harm to retain it. </s> ''']''' (]) 23:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC) T<s>he sexual harassment lawsuit is sourced to Chronicle of Higher Education, an altogether reliable source in the subject (supported by aq major radio station). i consider this probably sufficient documentation for BLP, assuming they are summarized correctly. I think is is ''certainly'' sufficient documentation that commenting it out was unwarranted. It is accepted that we protect what we find. I have no prior knowledge of this matter, but would think it justified only if there were a real absence of documentation. In relevant circles, the Chronicle is read more than Misplaced Pages, and certainly very much more trusted, so we would not be doing any harm to retain it. </s> ''']''' (]) 23:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
::sorry, I dont know why I thought the Chronicle--it was the Yale Daily News , and local newspapers, which would seem make this another matter entirely. 23:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC) ::sorry, I dont know why I thought the Chronicle--it was the Yale Daily News , and local newspapers, which would seem make this another matter entirely. ''']''' (]) 23:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


== Sexual harassment charges == == Sexual harassment charges ==

Revision as of 23:54, 2 December 2007

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Full protect (edit war in progress)

I have protected the page due to the edit war in progress and the BLP concerns in the section about the sexual harassment charge. I have also taken the exceptional measure of commenting out that section in order to avoid problems while the page is protected.

Please take the opportunity to discuss things out on this page, and arrive at a consensus. — Coren  22:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The sexual harassment lawsuit is sourced to Chronicle of Higher Education, an altogether reliable source in the subject (supported by aq major radio station). i consider this probably sufficient documentation for BLP, assuming they are summarized correctly. I think is is certainly sufficient documentation that commenting it out was unwarranted. It is accepted that we protect what we find. I have no prior knowledge of this matter, but would think it justified only if there were a real absence of documentation. In relevant circles, the Chronicle is read more than Misplaced Pages, and certainly very much more trusted, so we would not be doing any harm to retain it. DGG (talk) 23:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

sorry, I dont know why I thought the Chronicle--it was the Yale Daily News , and local newspapers, which would seem make this another matter entirely. DGG (talk) 23:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Sexual harassment charges

The sexual harassment claims simply describe a complaint brought by Mary Beth Garceau. There have been salacious unbalanced reports of these in various media, and the poster has simply cited blogs with the sordid details. Describing the little details of these hardly compares with the broad description of positive things about this top scientist.

Importantly, the case has been settled. BUT, there are no published details about the settlement. The user Truthertruther insists on interpreting an out-of-court settlement as guilt by Schlessinger. Not so. Perhaps Garceau's people discovered that they have no case and settled without compensation. There are no media reports on this. To assume guilt by Yale and Schlessinger is potentially libelous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Letsnotlie (talkcontribs) 22:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Before reinstating this section, I think we need real sources (not the blogs cited by Truthertruther) and some real resolution about the outcome of this case. If Schlessinger is innocent, Truthertruther is guilty of libel.Letsnotlie 23:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Your reasoning is convincing, to me at least. But with regard to "guilty of libel": Maybe, maybe not, but that kind of talk is not going to help with the situation. I dorftrotteltalk I 23:24, December 2, 2007

OK, thanks Dorftrottel. Either way, in the absence of proven guilt it seems appropriate to assume innocence.Letsnotlie 23:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Joseph Schlessinger: Difference between revisions Add topic