Talk:American Society of Anesthesiologists: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:31, 1 January 2025 editSpringee (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users18,493 edits →Addition of lobbying section UNDUE concerns ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:03, 1 January 2025 edit undoT g7 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users1,383 edits →Addition of lobbying section UNDUE concerns: ReplyTag: Reply Next edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:

	This is a relatively short article about a professional organization. Recently a lobbying section was added which is entirely negative and roughly doubles the length of the article. Additionally, it seems much of that content is based on grabbing any/all examples that could be considered problematic lobbying and inserting them into the article as a continuous section. It is possible that some amount of this material is DUE in the article. At this point the addition has been challenged thus consensus is needed to decide how much of the new content should be included. I'm reaching out to project Medicine to get additional editor feedback. ] (]) 19:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)		This is a relatively short article about a professional organization. Recently a lobbying section was added which is entirely negative and roughly doubles the length of the article. Additionally, it seems much of that content is based on grabbing any/all examples that could be considered problematic lobbying and inserting them into the article as a continuous section. It is possible that some amount of this material is DUE in the article. At this point the addition has been challenged thus consensus is needed to decide how much of the new content should be included. I'm reaching out to project Medicine to get additional editor feedback. ] (]) 19:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

			:I share these concerns. In my opinion, the lobbying section as it currently stands does not express a neutral point of view. ] (]) 22:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:03, 1 January 2025

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Society of Anesthesiologists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070404075449/http://www.anes.uab.edu/aneshist/aneshist.htm to http://www.anes.uab.edu/aneshist/aneshist.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Addition of lobbying section UNDUE concerns

This is a relatively short article about a professional organization. Recently a lobbying section was added which is entirely negative and roughly doubles the length of the article. Additionally, it seems much of that content is based on grabbing any/all examples that could be considered problematic lobbying and inserting them into the article as a continuous section. It is possible that some amount of this material is DUE in the article. At this point the addition has been challenged thus consensus is needed to decide how much of the new content should be included. I'm reaching out to project Medicine to get additional editor feedback. Springee (talk) 19:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

I share these concerns. In my opinion, the lobbying section as it currently stands does not express a neutral point of view. T g7 (talk) 22:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories: