Misplaced Pages

Talk:Loongson: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:42, 24 February 2007 editYongke (talk | contribs)154 edits →Pentium 4← Previous edit Revision as of 11:21, 25 February 2007 edit undoThumperward (talk | contribs)Administrators122,813 edits →Pentium 4: indent a reply, reply myselfNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
This article goes through a lot of trouble to compare the Godson 2E to an Intel Pentium 4. It's probably worth noting that the P4 completely sucks and was a mistake of a processor. Plus, the chips use different instruction sets and are/were intended to run different applications, so performance is not directly comparable. {{unsigned|24.15.28.57|14 November 2006}} This article goes through a lot of trouble to compare the Godson 2E to an Intel Pentium 4. It's probably worth noting that the P4 completely sucks and was a mistake of a processor. Plus, the chips use different instruction sets and are/were intended to run different applications, so performance is not directly comparable. {{unsigned|24.15.28.57|14 November 2006}}


So what is your point then. P4 completely suck? Or this processor should not be compared to it. In both case I have to disagree. P4 was good when it came out and like all things became obsolete. As for comparison, well, I don't really see a better alternative. No two processor are exactly the same, but that is not a condition for comparison. ] 16:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC) : So what is your point then. P4 completely suck? Or this processor should not be compared to it. In both case I have to disagree. P4 was good when it came out and like all things became obsolete. As for comparison, well, I don't really see a better alternative. No two processor are exactly the same, but that is not a condition for comparison. ] 16:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

: That's nice. Feel free to de-emphasise this comparison should you ever return. ] 11:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:21, 25 February 2007

WikiProject iconChina Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Loongson article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Godson related things

See my comments about generally Godson related things in the discussion section about this Yellow Sheep River develops €123 Linux based computer Wikinews article. Paul Kouwelas 06:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Pentium 4

This article goes through a lot of trouble to compare the Godson 2E to an Intel Pentium 4. It's probably worth noting that the P4 completely sucks and was a mistake of a processor. Plus, the chips use different instruction sets and are/were intended to run different applications, so performance is not directly comparable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.28.57 (talk • contribs) 14 November 2006 (UTC)

So what is your point then. P4 completely suck? Or this processor should not be compared to it. In both case I have to disagree. P4 was good when it came out and like all things became obsolete. As for comparison, well, I don't really see a better alternative. No two processor are exactly the same, but that is not a condition for comparison. Yongke 16:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
That's nice. Feel free to de-emphasise this comparison should you ever return. Chris Cunningham 11:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Loongson: Difference between revisions Add topic