Talk:Loongson: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 08:37, 18 February 2007 editIdeogram (talk \| contribs)11,726 edits wpchina← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:42, 24 February 2007 edit undoYongke (talk \| contribs)154 edits →Pentium 4 Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	This article goes through a lot of trouble to compare the Godson 2E to an Intel Pentium 4. It's probably worth noting that the P4 completely sucks and was a mistake of a processor. Plus, the chips use different instruction sets and are/were intended to run different applications, so performance is not directly comparable. {{unsigned\|24.15.28.57\|14 November 2006}}		This article goes through a lot of trouble to compare the Godson 2E to an Intel Pentium 4. It's probably worth noting that the P4 completely sucks and was a mistake of a processor. Plus, the chips use different instruction sets and are/were intended to run different applications, so performance is not directly comparable. {{unsigned\|24.15.28.57\|14 November 2006}}

			So what is your point then. P4 completely suck? Or this processor should not be compared to it. In both case I have to disagree. P4 was good when it came out and like all things became obsolete. As for comparison, well, I don't really see a better alternative. No two processor are exactly the same, but that is not a condition for comparison. ] 16:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:42, 24 February 2007

China Stub‑class Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Loongson article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Godson related things

See my comments about generally Godson related things in the discussion section about this Yellow Sheep River develops €123 Linux based computer Wikinews article. Paul Kouwelas 06:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Pentium 4

This article goes through a lot of trouble to compare the Godson 2E to an Intel Pentium 4. It's probably worth noting that the P4 completely sucks and was a mistake of a processor. Plus, the chips use different instruction sets and are/were intended to run different applications, so performance is not directly comparable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.28.57 (talk • contribs) 14 November 2006 (UTC)

So what is your point then. P4 completely suck? Or this processor should not be compared to it. In both case I have to disagree. P4 was good when it came out and like all things became obsolete. As for comparison, well, I don't really see a better alternative. No two processor are exactly the same, but that is not a condition for comparison. Yongke 16:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Categories:

Revision as of 08:37, 18 February 2007 editIdeogram (talk \| contribs)11,726 edits wpchina← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:42, 24 February 2007 edit undoYongke (talk \| contribs)154 edits →Pentium 4 Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	This article goes through a lot of trouble to compare the Godson 2E to an Intel Pentium 4. It's probably worth noting that the P4 completely sucks and was a mistake of a processor. Plus, the chips use different instruction sets and are/were intended to run different applications, so performance is not directly comparable. {{unsigned\|24.15.28.57\|14 November 2006}}		This article goes through a lot of trouble to compare the Godson 2E to an Intel Pentium 4. It's probably worth noting that the P4 completely sucks and was a mistake of a processor. Plus, the chips use different instruction sets and are/were intended to run different applications, so performance is not directly comparable. {{unsigned\|24.15.28.57\|14 November 2006}}

			So what is your point then. P4 completely suck? Or this processor should not be compared to it. In both case I have to disagree. P4 was good when it came out and like all things became obsolete. As for comparison, well, I don't really see a better alternative. No two processor are exactly the same, but that is not a condition for comparison. ] 16:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)