| Revision as of 11:01, 14 February 2007 editSarah (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions18,075 edits →Go...: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:26, 14 February 2007 edit undoWikiTony (talk | contribs)1,551 edits the olive branchNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| ==Hey== | ==Hey== | ||
| Hey Chacor, sorry, I was dealing with a block evasion and by the time I got there Nearly Headless Nick had already left him a message. I agree his use of edit summaries and his messages to you and Coredesat were out-of-line. He hasn't edited for a few hours, though, and hopefully when he get's back he'll have calmed down. If it keeps up, let me know. Cheers, ''']''' 11:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | Hey Chacor, sorry, I was dealing with a block evasion and by the time I got there Nearly Headless Nick had already left him a message. I agree his use of edit summaries and his messages to you and Coredesat were out-of-line. He hasn't edited for a few hours, though, and hopefully when he get's back he'll have calmed down. If it keeps up, let me know. Cheers, ''']''' 11:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == the olive branch == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| Althought the wording i used may have been a bit impolite, i stand by my opinions and edits. The plane crash story is not internationally relevant, and IMHO, does not belong on current events. Planes crash all the time. People even die. Nobody died here. Just because the BBC covers the story does not mean it belongs on the current events page. And by the way i never directed you away from the current events page. i just suggested you learn how to properly write a current events blurb (including proper grammar). i also think it was rather childish of you to run to your admin buddies instead of at the very least attempting to sort the problem out amongst ourselves. I mean you no personal hostility- i just think your selection of relevant news stories and writing style is questionable. If you want to see how current events "should" be written, explore my contribs. I know i do not own the current events page (another cheap shot AND personal attack by you) but i do take pride in making sure all entries are relevant, factual, and gramatically correct. I hope we can put this unpleasantness behind us and work towards continuing to build wikipedia's excellence, which we both obviously care about. If you have any further problems with me please approach me directly so we can handle it like mature adults (if you are one). Peace and love. ] 17:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:26, 14 February 2007
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Chacor. |
 |
This is the User talk page for Chacor.
|
|
|
My pics
Umm, they were in the Misplaced Pages articles, so I see no problem with them being on my page. I'm not braking a law. If the owners of the pics want to come sue me, let them. It's not a big deal. I can't stand this crap with fair use. It's legal. No one can sue you. Stop worrying about it. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 06:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- What?! I did nothing wrong. What pics are wrong? I don't see any. What pics are you talking about? This is ridiculous. Why are you targeting me now at 1:42 in the morning. Leave it be. The is the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my life. If they're in the articles, why can't I have them on my userpage? How about you explain that to me instead of counting to three. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 06:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- You didn't answer my question, which images are you talking about? Why are you handcuffing me when there are plenty of others out there who use the same userboxes? Why does Misplaced Pages treat it like a cardinal sin? You have broken the sacred code, you must be banned. Misplaced Pages's image as a 💕 is not going to be tarnished by a few images on someone's userpage that fall under a different part of US law. Not that you care what I think. It's not like it matters. I am but a powerless slave in this this horrible grist mill. To think thousands would flock to a place whose policy says, "You have no rights, shup up and work while I sit on my butt and laugh at you." I really only stay because I have befriended some people in the hurricane pages and like to help them out. Now you probably don't agree with a single word of that and nor do you have to. I'm not forcing you to agree with me. I'm not saying agree or leave. I'm saying how I feel and all I ask is that you listen, and answer the questions I posed at the beginning. I also ask that you let me alone for now. It is 2 o'clock in the morning and I am tired and irritable as you can see. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 07:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Editor review
Hi there, I'm not applying in June to become an administrator just because I think it would show I was a good user or I was a sergeant like person, I'm doing it because I would like to help the wikipedia community in things such as closing AFD's, TFD's, UCFD's, CFD's and MFD's as-well as helping out with help request on cases and vandalism fighting such as keeing a regular chack on WP:AIV, I hope you understand my point. The reason I left my personal standard of edit count per mont on that user's RFA was because I believed it to be the approximate amount (however if all of his edits that month were creating factual and up-to standard articles then I would definitely change my vote to support), if there was a reason why it was low then I can undrstand that and admit I was wrong. Thanks and I hope we can remain civil over this. If you have any more comments please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave any more comments on my editor review.Tellyaddict 20:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Madagascar
The problem is "Madagascan" is totally WP:NEO and blatantly against policy. Yes, Malagasy is ambiguous as both an ethnicity and a nationality adjective, but no more so than "German".--Pharos 01:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
As I read the conversation, I don't think it was really definitively discussed in the first place (I can't find a record of anyone else actually agreeing that it should be at "Madagascan"). Anyway, such an obviously non-real name for a country had to be changed quickly, and in this case I opted to be WP:BOLD. If you still contest it, that's something else, of course, but I think the case is clear.--Pharos 02:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Good news
Hey Chacor, not sure if you were aware of it or not but User:Metta Bubble has returned. Cheers. (→Netscott) 01:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
POTY 2006
Your vote was not considered because you did not sign as a Commons user. If you don't have an account in Commos, please sign with your IP and insert a "diff", according to instructions. Alvesgaspar 10:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Replied, rather confused, on commons. – Chacor 11:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Nothing is lost! Let me quote the instructions in the POTY 2006 page:
- To vote, you must be an established Wiki editor with at least 100 edits registered either on your Commons or on your home wiki account (eg on one of the Misplaced Pages sites). If you have a Commons username, please vote under that name. If not, you can vote under your IP address. If you don't have 100 edits on your Commons account, but do on your home wiki, please add a diff pointing to a statement on your home wiki talk page which confirms your identity. For example: diff which appears as diff, or diff which appears as diff. All votes must identify the voter either by a logged-in Commons username, or by posting a diff to your local talk page as shown above. Votes that do not comply will be excluded.
This means that you have to sign the votinh entry with your Commons username and, if you don't have 100 edits in Commons, insert a "diff" to your home wiki, as explained. Please vote again, you have plenty of time :) - Alvesgaspar 14:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Go...
You attacked me first, buddy. All i did was justly criticize your terrible grammar and awful selection of news stories. A plane crash in moscow that nobody died in is not internationally relevant. I gauruntee somebody else takes it down. I have been on WP for over almost 2 years. Why the hell are you putting a "welcome" page on my talk. How about you talk to me like a real person instead of crying to one of your little admin friends? Stay the hell off my talk page. Stick to editing your little admin pages. Based on your previous entries, you have no buisiness editing current events (that is not a personal attack, just an honest criticism). UGHHHHHH WikiTony 03:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey
Hey Chacor, sorry, I was dealing with a block evasion and by the time I got there Nearly Headless Nick had already left him a message. I agree his use of edit summaries and his messages to you and Coredesat were out-of-line. He hasn't edited for a few hours, though, and hopefully when he get's back he'll have calmed down. If it keeps up, let me know. Cheers, Sarah 11:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
the olive branch
Hi,
Althought the wording i used may have been a bit impolite, i stand by my opinions and edits. The plane crash story is not internationally relevant, and IMHO, does not belong on current events. Planes crash all the time. People even die. Nobody died here. Just because the BBC covers the story does not mean it belongs on the current events page. And by the way i never directed you away from the current events page. i just suggested you learn how to properly write a current events blurb (including proper grammar). i also think it was rather childish of you to run to your admin buddies instead of at the very least attempting to sort the problem out amongst ourselves. I mean you no personal hostility- i just think your selection of relevant news stories and writing style is questionable. If you want to see how current events "should" be written, explore my contribs. I know i do not own the current events page (another cheap shot AND personal attack by you) but i do take pride in making sure all entries are relevant, factual, and gramatically correct. I hope we can put this unpleasantness behind us and work towards continuing to build wikipedia's excellence, which we both obviously care about. If you have any further problems with me please approach me directly so we can handle it like mature adults (if you are one). Peace and love. WikiTony 17:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)