Revision as of 00:39, 30 October 2006 editRetiredUser167213 (talk | contribs)19,842 edits Reverting Durin's tirrany← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:04, 6 January 2025 edit undo2607:fea8:255f:cd00:d60a:f301:cb13:3f47 (talk)No edit summary | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|none}} | |||
{{future election}} | |||
{{pp-move}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2019}} | |||
{{Infobox election | |||
| election_name = 2008 Canadian federal election | |||
| country = Canada | |||
| type = parliamentary | |||
| party_colour = no | |||
| party_name = no | |||
| previous_election = 2006 Canadian federal election | |||
| previous_year = 2006 | |||
| previous_mps = List of House members of the 39th Parliament of Canada | |||
| next_election = 2011 Canadian federal election | |||
| next_year = 2011 | |||
| elected_mps = List of House members of the 40th Parliament of Canada | |||
| seats_for_election = 308 seats in the ] <br /> 155 seats needed for a majority | |||
| election_date = {{start date|2008|10|14}} | |||
| opinion_polls = Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election, 2008 | |||
| turnout = 58.8% ({{decrease}}5.9]) | |||
| image_size = x160px | |||
| image1 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Stephen Harper by Remy Steinegger Infobox.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 160|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}} | |||
| colour1 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|nohash}} | |||
| leader1 = ] | |||
| leader_since1 = ] | |||
| party1 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|name}} | |||
| leaders_seat1 = ] | |||
| last_election1 = 124 seats, 36.27% | |||
| seats_before1 = 127 | |||
| seats1 = 143 | |||
| seat_change1 = {{increase}}16 | |||
| popular_vote1 = 5,209,069 | |||
| percentage1 = 37.65% | |||
| swing1 = {{increase}}1.38] | |||
| image2 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Stéphane Dion.jpg|bSize = 160|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 160|oTop = 0|oLeft = 13}} | |||
| colour2 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|nohash}} | |||
| leader2 = ] | |||
| leader_since2 = ] | |||
| party2 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|name}} | |||
| leaders_seat2 = ] | |||
| last_election2 = 103 seats, 30.23% | |||
| seats_before2 = 95 | |||
| seats2 = 77 | |||
| seat_change2 = {{decrease}}18 | |||
| popular_vote2 = 3,633,185 | |||
| percentage2 = 26.26% | |||
| swing2 = {{decrease}}3.97] | |||
| image3 = Gilles Duceppe 2011-04-01 (cropped).jpg | |||
| colour3 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|nohash}} | |||
| leader3 = ] | |||
| leader_since3 = ] | |||
| party3 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|name}} | |||
| leaders_seat3 = ] | |||
| last_election3 = 51 seats, 10.48% | |||
| seats_before3 = 48 | |||
| seats3 = 49 | |||
| seat_change3 = {{increase}}1 | |||
| popular_vote3 = 1,379,991 | |||
| percentage3 = 9.98%{{efn-lr|group=results0|Only contested seats in ].}} | |||
| swing3 = {{decrease}}0.50] | |||
| image4 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Jack Layton-cr bl (cropped).jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 160|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}} | |||
| colour4 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|nohash}} | |||
| leader4 = ] | |||
| leader_since4 = ] | |||
| party4 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|name}} | |||
| leaders_seat4 = ] | |||
| last_election4 = 29 seats, 17.48% | |||
| seats_before4 = 30 | |||
| seats4 = 37 | |||
| seat_change4 = {{increase}}7 | |||
| popular_vote4 = 2,515,288 | |||
| percentage4 = 18.18% | |||
| swing4 = {{increase}}0.70] | |||
| image5 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Elizabeth May 2a.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 160|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}} | |||
| colour5 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Green|nohash}} | |||
| leader5 = ] | |||
| leader_since5 = ] | |||
| party5 = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Green|name}} | |||
| leaders_seat5 = ''Ran in ] (lost)'' | |||
| last_election5 = 0 seats, 4.48% | |||
| seats_before5 = 1<!-- Blair Wilson was elected as a Liberal, became an independent, then joined the Greens --> | |||
| seats5 = 0 | |||
| seat_change5 = {{decrease}}1 | |||
| popular_vote5 = 937,613 | |||
| percentage5 = 6.78% | |||
| swing5 = {{increase}}2.30] | |||
<!-- map -->| map = {{Switcher | |||
| ] | |||
| Results by electoral district, shaded by winners' vote share | |||
| ] | |||
| Results by province and territory}} | |||
| title = Prime Minister | |||
| posttitle = Prime Minister after election | |||
| before_election = ] | |||
| before_party = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|name}} | |||
| after_election = ] | |||
| after_party = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|name}} | |||
}} | |||
The '''2008 Canadian federal election''' was held on October 14, 2008, to elect members to the ] of the ] after the ] had been dissolved by ] ] on September 7, 2008. | |||
] ] ] called the election due to his belief that there was a lack of cooperation between the ] Conservatives and the opposition parties, which the former had to rely on to pass legislation; hence Harper argued that Parliament had reached the end of its productiveness. | |||
The '''40th Canadian federal election''', barring war or ], must be called by ], ], five years after the return of the writs from the ] held on ], ]. Traditionally in Canada the Prime Minister can select an election date of his or her choosing, usually at the four-year mark or when he or she believes they have the best chance of winning the election. However, as the preceding parliament will be led by a ], it is possible that an election will occur sooner as the opposition parties can bring down the government on a ] or that the Prime Minister will request that the ] dissolve parliament for an early election in an attempt to win a ]. | |||
The election resulted in a second but stronger minority government for Harper's Conservatives. While they were a dozen seats away from a ], the ] led by ] lost 18 seats as the ] and the ] made slight gains. The ] failed to win any seats and lost ]. Following the election, the Liberals and New Democrats ] and topple the Conservatives from power, but were unsuccessful in doing so. | |||
On election night, more than 65% of eligible Canadian voters went to the polls to cast their vote in Canada's 39th federal general election. The Conservatives received the most votes, with 36% of the vote and 124 seats (now 125 from the switch of Liberal MP David Emerson). The Liberals won 103 seats (now 101), taking 30% of the vote. The Bloc Quebecois lost 3 seats, and lowering their score to 51 seats (now 50), with 11% of the vote. The New Democratic Party retained all their previous seats, in addition to 11 more, making their total 29 seats, with 18% of the vote. The Green Party received 5% of the vote, a minimal increase from the previous election, but this did not translate into any seats. Other parties constituted 1% of the total vote. | |||
==Background== | |||
Canadians next chance to go to the polls will be Canada's 40th federal election, widely anticipated to take place in either 2007 or 2008. However, in the absence of the government falling on a confidence motion thus triggering an election, Stephen Harper's government could formally last until Winter 2011. | |||
{{See also|Fixed election dates in Canada}} | |||
In 2007, Parliament passed a law fixing federal election dates every four years and scheduling the next election date as October 19, 2009, but the law did not limit the powers of the Governor General to dissolve Parliament at any time, such as when ] bring down the government on a ]. In this election there was no loss of a non-confidence vote, but the Prime Minister asked the Governor General to call an election. The Governor General granted the Prime Minister's request. | |||
===2006 election=== | |||
] is led by the smallest minority ever in the ] — a government with just 40.6% of the seats — and led by the ]. Though the average length of a ] in Canada is 1 year, 5 months and 22 days, minorities led by the former ] tended to be much shorter: the longest previous Conservative minority was just 6 months and 19 days. The 39th Parliament became Canada's longest serving Conservative minority on ], ]. | |||
64.7% of eligible voters cast ballots in the ]. The ] received the most votes of any single party, with 36% of the vote, and won 124 seats (127 at dissolution). The Liberal Party won fewer seats than in 2004 – 103 seats (96 at dissolution), and 30% of the vote. The Bloc Québécois lost three seats, lowering its total to 51 seats (48 at dissolution), with 10.5% of the vote. The NDP retained its seats held at the ], and won 11 more, making its total 29 seats (30 at dissolution), with 17.5% of the vote. The ] received 4.5% of the vote, a minimal increase from the previous election, but did not win any seats (1 at dissolution). ] and other parties constituted 1% of the total vote with one independent winning a seat. | |||
===Events since the 2006 election=== | |||
On ], ], the Conservatives ]d Bill C-16 which would amend the ] which would provide for fixed elections. The bill states that there will be an election in 2009, and it would be the first to have a fixed election date, the third Monday in October (], ]). However, the House may still fall before then, and there may be an election still in 2007 or 2008. The bill is currently in its first reading. | |||
{{further|39th Canadian Parliament}} | |||
{{legend|#6495ED|Conservatives (143)}} | |||
{{legend|#F08080|Liberals (77)}} | |||
{{legend|#87CEFA|Bloc Québécois (49)}} | |||
{{legend|#F4A460|New Democrats (37)}} | |||
{{legend|#DCDCDC|Independent (2)}} | |||
{{wikinews|Early Canadian federal election set for October 14}} | |||
Since the 2006 election, seven ] (MPs) had changed party: ], ], and ] from Liberal to Conservative; ] from Conservative to Independent to Liberal; ] from Liberal to Independent to Green; ] from Bloc Québécois to Independent; and ] from Conservative to Independent. In by-elections, the NDP gained one seat from the Liberal Party, while the Conservative Party gained two seats, one from the Liberals and one from the Bloc Québécois. Four seats were vacant when the election was called: three previously held by the Liberal Party, one by the Bloc Québécois. | |||
] was led by the Conservatives, who governed with the smallest plurality ever in the Canadian House of Commons, just 40.6% of the seats. Although the average length of a ] in Canada is 1 year, 5 months, and 22 days (measured from the return of the writs after an election to the dissolution of that parliament), minorities led by the former ] have been much shorter: the longest previous Conservative minority was just 6 months and 19 days.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060305141948/http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/about/process/info/parl-dates.asp?lang=E&srt=DESC&Hist=Y¶m=MIN |date=March 5, 2006 }}, '']''</ref> The 39th Parliament became Canada's longest serving Conservative minority on October 24, 2006. | |||
It has been rumoured by political pundits that Harper would like to have an election in fall 2006 or spring 2007 in hopes of attaining a majority of the Commons seats. It has been speculated that he would hold off on an election though until ] has a ] as to measure the strength of federalist feelings in that province | |||
On May 30, 2006, the Conservatives ]d An Act to Amend the Canada Elections Act, which would amend the ] to provide fixed election dates. The bill received royal assent on May 3, 2007. The bill states that there will be an election in 2009, and it would be the first to have a fixed election date, the third Monday in October (October 19, 2009). Despite the bill, on September 7, 2008, the ] sought the dissolution of the 39th Parliament, and the Governor General agreed to hold a general election on October 14, 2008. | |||
On February 15, 2007, '']'' reported that the Conservatives were preparing for an election expected to be called shortly after the 2007 budget, due on March 19, 2007. Part of the reason for the timing of the election was given as strengthening Conservative poll numbers coupled with the desire to take advantage of the perception that Harper has "better leadership qualities than Liberal counterpart ]".<ref>, '']'', February 15, 2007</ref> | |||
On March 17, 2007, an internal Conservative Party memo was leaked to '']'', telling members that they "need to be ready to campaign within the next week". The memo asked members to donate $75 to $150 to help to fund the early stages of the election campaign. None of these predictions for a federal election to occur in 2007 proved true, but the majority of ] still believed a federal election would be triggered before the fixed election date of October 19, 2009, for sometime in 2008. | |||
] hinted at the possibility of dissolving parliament on August 14, 2008. Speaking in ], he cited Stéphane Dion as the main player in making Parliament become increasingly "dysfunctional". "I'm going to have to make a judgment in the next little while as to whether or not this Parliament can function productively," Harper said. This came after repeated ] that resulted in the NDP and Bloc parties not voting in favour of the government, and the Liberal Party voting in favour or not attending the vote. Rumours of a possible fall election were further fuelled by Harper's announcement of a fourth federal by-election for September 22 in the Toronto riding of ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Harper hints at triggering election |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-hints-at-triggering-election-1.745252 |publisher=] |date=August 14, 2008 |access-date=August 18, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Harper calls a 4th federal by-election, sets stage for possible fall general election |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-calls-a-4th-federal-byelection-sets-stage-for-possible-fall-general-election-1.760533 |publisher=] |date=August 17, 2008 |access-date=August 18, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
On August 27, 2008, Harper asked Governor General ] to cancel her trip to the ], adding fuel to speculation that the Prime Minister would seek a dissolution. On September 7, 2008 after much speculation, Harper asked the Governor General to call a federal election on October 14, 2008. | |||
==Timeline== | ==Timeline== | ||
{{main|2008 Timeline of the Canadian federal election}} | |||
*], ] - Harper ] is sworn in. Liberal ] ] to join the new government thus changing the standings in the ] to Conservatives 125, Liberals 102, BQ 51, NDP 29, Independent 1. This could potentially be very relevant in terms of numbers, as it now allows a Conservative-NDP voting block to command a majority. | |||
*], ] - ] ] ] announces that his party will vote to keep the government in office for a "good while". So long as the Bloc votes with the government on ] measures, they will pass. | |||
*], ] - ] is re-elected ] becoming only the third Opposition MP to serve as Speaker. The Speaker only votes in the event of a tie and then must vote to support the "status quo". The election of a Liberal Speaker effectively gives the Conservatives an additional cushion by denying the Liberals a vote. Numerically, the Conservatives can now pass legislation and win motions of confidence with the support of any one Opposition party, i.e. the Conservatives and the NDP combined have enough seats to win a vote, as do the Tories and BQ combined or the Tories and the Liberals (assuming all MPs are present and vote without any defections). | |||
*], ] Bloc Member of Parliament ] dies in a car accident. | |||
*], ] Liberal MP for ] ] resigns to run for mayor of ]. | |||
*], ] Conservative MP for ] ] is suspended from the Conservative Party. He chooses to sit temporarily as Independent, but has been courted by the ]. | |||
*February 6, 2006: Harper ] is sworn in. | |||
==Target seats== | |||
*May 3, 2007: Bill C-16 receives ]. This bill states that the next election must be held on October 19, 2009, unless there is an earlier dissolution. | |||
<!--needs to be updated from last election--> | |||
*August 26, 2008: Harper indicates he may call an election for the fall of 2008; Parliament could be dissolved as early as the week of September 1–6. | |||
*August 29, 2008: Harper meets with Gilles Duceppe, the leader of the Bloc Québécois in an attempt to find common ground between the Bloc and the Conservatives. | |||
*August 30, 2008: | |||
** Former Liberal MP ] joins the Green Party after being an Independent for nearly a year in the riding of ] in ]. Wilson becomes the first Member of Parliament for the Green Party. | |||
** Harper meets with ], the leader of the New Democrats in an attempt to find common ground between the NDP and the Conservatives. | |||
*September 1, 2008: Harper meets with Stéphane Dion, the leader of the Liberals, in an attempt to find common ground between the Liberals and the Conservatives, and avert the dissolution of Parliament, allowing the fall session to continue as planned. However, after a twenty-minute meeting at ], the PM's official residence, Dion emerges stating there is no common ground between the two parties, and that an election is certain. | |||
*September 5, 2008: The ] (PMO) announces that Prime Minister Stephen Harper will visit the Governor General at 9:00 am on September 7, 2008 to ask for the dissolution of the 39th Parliament and a general election on October 14, 2008.<ref>{{cite web | |||
| title=Public events for September 7, 2008 | |||
| url=http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=4&id=2266 | |||
| work=] | |||
| date=September 5, 2008 | |||
| access-date=September 7, 2008 | |||
| url-status=dead | |||
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081210212651/http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=4&id=2266 | |||
| archive-date=December 10, 2008 | |||
| df=mdy-all | |||
}}</ref> | |||
*September 7, 2008: Prime Minister Harper asks Governor General Michaëlle Jean to call a general election on October 14, 2008. She accepts the request.<ref name="drive">{{cite news | |||
|title = PM talks the talk but doesn't walk to Rideau Hall | |||
|url = https://www.ctvnews.ca/pm-talks-the-talk-but-doesn-t-walk-to-rideau-hall-1.322604 | |||
|work = ] | |||
|date = September 7, 2008 | |||
|access-date = September 7, 2008 | |||
|url-status = live | |||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080916010404/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080907/election2008_green_efforts_080907/20080907?s_name=election2008 | |||
|archive-date = September 16, 2008 | |||
|df = mdy-all | |||
}}</ref> | |||
*October 14, 2008: Elections held for members of the House of Commons in the ].<ref name="Letters Patent"> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101226054421/http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2008/2008-09-08-x4/pdf/g2-142x4.pdf |date=December 26, 2010 }} dissolving Parliament, setting calling election, and summoning a new Parliament.</ref> | |||
*November 4, 2008: Writs to be returned to the Chief Election Officer.<ref name="Letters Patent"/> | |||
*November 18, 2008: 40th Parliament summoned.<ref name="parliament summoned">{{cite news | |||
| title=Proclamation Summoning Parliament to Meet on November 18, 2008 | |||
| url=http://gazetteducanada.gc.ca/partII/2008/20081110-x5/html/extra5-e.html | |||
| work=] | |||
| date=November 10, 2008 | |||
| access-date=December 9, 2008}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> | |||
*December 1, 2008: The Liberals and NDP sign agreement<ref name="proposed_coalition_Liberals_and_NDP">{{cite news | |||
|title=An Accord on a Cooperative Government to Address the Present Economic Crisis | |||
|url=http://www.liberal.ca/pdf/docs/081201_Accord_en_signed.pdf | |||
|work=], ] | |||
|date=December 1, 2008 | |||
|access-date=December 9, 2008 | |||
|url-status=dead | |||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081209092933/http://www.liberal.ca/pdf/docs/081201_Accord_en_signed.pdf | |||
|archive-date=December 9, 2008 | |||
}}</ref> on proposed coalition government to replace the governing Conservatives under Prime Minister Harper.<ref name="deal_news">{{cite news | |||
| title=Liberals, NDP, Bloc sign deal on proposed coalition | |||
| url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/liberals-ndp-bloc-sign-deal-on-proposed-coalition-1.700119 | |||
| work=] | |||
| date=December 1, 2008 | |||
| access-date=December 9, 2008}}</ref> | |||
*December 1, 2008: The Liberals, NDP, and Bloc Québécois sign "policy accord"<ref name="policy_accord_Liberals_NDP_and_BQ">{{cite news | |||
|title=A Policy Accord to Address the Present Economic Crisis | |||
|url=http://www.liberal.ca/pdf/docs/081201_Policy_Frame_en_signed.pdf | |||
|work=], ], ] | |||
|date=December 1, 2008 | |||
|access-date=December 9, 2008 | |||
|url-status=dead | |||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081217110920/http://www.liberal.ca/pdf/docs/081201_Policy_Frame_en_signed.pdf | |||
|archive-date=December 17, 2008 | |||
}}</ref> whereby the Bloc would support a Liberal/NDP government for at least 18 months.<ref name="deal_news"/> | |||
*December 4, 2008: Parliament prorogued by the Governor General during the ] on advice of the Prime Minister.<ref name="prorogued">{{cite news | |||
| title=Proclamation Proroguing Parliament to January 26, 2009 | |||
| url=http://gazetteducanada.gc.ca/partII/2008/20081205-x6/html/si144-e.html | |||
| work=] | |||
| date=December 5, 2008 | |||
| access-date=December 9, 2008}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> | |||
*January 26, 2009: Parliament to reconvene for second session.<ref name="prorogued"/> | |||
==Pre-election== | |||
The following is a list of ridings which were narrowly lost by the indicated party. For instance, under the Liberal column are the 30 seats in which they came closest to winning but did not. Listed is the name of the riding, followed by the party which was victorious (in parentheses) and the margin, in terms of percentage of the vote, by which the party lost. | |||
{{more citations needed section|date=September 2008}} | |||
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he was considering calling an election because of a lack of cooperation in Parliament, saying "all the signs indicate that this Parliament is at the end of its productiveness," while in ], ]. The Conservative Party of Canada fueled rumours of an oncoming election when it released several ] that focused on a range of issues, and attacked the Liberal Party of Canada for their proposed ]. The ] (PMO) confirmed that Harper would call an election for October 14 after meeting with New Democratic Party leader ] and Bloc Québécois leader ], which gave the Prime Minister little hope that a fall session of Parliament can be productive, PMO officials said.<ref>{{cite news |title=Layton predicts fall election call after meeting with Harper |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/layton-predicts-fall-election-call-after-meeting-with-harper-1.724021 |work=CBC News |date=August 30, 2008}}</ref> Senior government officials announced on the first of September that Stephen Harper would ask the Governor General, ], to dissolve parliament and call an election for October 14, after he met with Liberal leader Stéphane Dion who called the meeting a "charade". Dion said the two were unable to agree on how to make the upcoming session of Parliament, slated to begin September 15, more productive. | |||
Liberal Party members gathered in ] on September 2, for a three-day caucus which changed from preparing for a new parliamentary session to a strategy session to formulate a plan to attack the Conservatives while healing internal party rifts that have surfaced in recent weeks. Conservatives began spending at least $60 million on pre-election funding projects to a wide variety of institutions and groups. A few announcements have been big, including ] ]'s pledge of $25 million for the expansion of the ] exhibition facility in ]. But the Tories have also announced a number of smaller projects, including $40,000 for the 2008 55+ Games and $25,000 for the Peace Window of the Holy Trinity Anglican Church in Winnipeg. The announcements have also been spread out across the country. The Atlantic region is to get more than $500,000 for youth jobs and eight cultural organizations. The Association of Book Publishers of ] will receive $81,000. Jack Layton attacked the Conservative Party as bribing the public and doing the same thing they used to complain about the Liberals doing before elections. | |||
These ridings are likely to be targeted by the specified party because the party lost them by a very slim margin in the 2006 election. | |||
A survey conducted by ] found that 38 per cent of Canadians would vote for the Conservative party if an election were held immediately, 28 per cent would vote for the Liberal party, 19 for the NDP, eight for the Bloc Québécois and seven for the Green party. The poll shows Conservatives taking early leads in ], British Columbia and ]. In ], Liberals still hold a strong majority, while in Quebec the Bloc Québécois leads while the Conservatives and Liberals are almost tied for second. When asked, most Canadians said the Conservatives would handle the economy better, while most said the Liberals would handle the environment better. | |||
On September 7, Harper officially asked for the dissolution of Parliament, and called for an election on October 14. | |||
==Election campaign== | |||
The 40th Canadian Federal Election campaign officially began at 8:20 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time when Governor General Michaëlle Jean accepted Stephen Harper's request to dissolve Parliament and call an election for October 14, 2008. The party leaders jumped right into the campaign, with ] attacking the Conservative's record, presenting the Liberal plan, and rejected the accusation by Harper that the Liberal party is a risky choice. ] took a more forceful approach than previous elections, in which the New Democratic Party has just tried to maintain a high number of seats in Parliament to influence government. Layton has made it clear he will campaign for the position of prime minister itself this time, but also returned to a longstanding NDP theme: alleged abuses by big business. He promised to stop what he called "ripoffs" by big oil, cellphone and banks, and his attacks are expected to focus on the Conservatives and all but ignore the Liberals. ] of the Green Party said Canadians would care enough about the environment to vote for her party, as long as she was able to get into the television debates. Stephen Harper has stated his objection to including the Green Party into television debates because of the similar policies of the Green and Liberal party, and how it would be unfair. Bloc Québécois Leader ] said the Conservatives must be prevented from winning a majority, and the ] is the only party that can do that. Duceppe compared Harper to ] ], and said the government is incompetent. | |||
===Leaders' Debates=== | |||
The two ], one each in French and English, included the leaders of five parties, Stephen Harper of the Conservatives, Stéphane Dion of the Liberals, Jack Layton of the NDP, Gilles Duceppe of the Bloc Québécois and Elizabeth May of the Green Party. | |||
The French-language debate aired on Wednesday, October 1 from 8 to 10 p.m. ], moderated by ], a journalist and host. The English-language debate aired Thursday, October 2 from 9 to 11 p.m. EDT, with ] of ] as moderator. | |||
====Participation==== | |||
{{Wikinews|Canada's leadership debate: the Green Party will take part}} | |||
Three parties — the Conservatives, the Bloc Québécois and the NDP — opposed the inclusion of the Green Party, citing statements made by Green Party leader Elizabeth May to the effect that the best outcome of the election would be a Liberal-led government, and a deal struck between the Green Party and Liberals where the Liberals would not run in May's riding, Central Nova, and the Green party in Liberal leader Stéphane Dion's riding, Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, which they say make May a "second Liberal candidate".<ref name="MayDebate">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/green-leader-allowed-into-debates-networks-confirm-1.732026|title=Green leader allowed into debates, networks confirm|access-date=September 10, 2008 |last=] |date=September 10, 2008 |work=CBC News}}</ref> | |||
Stephen Harper and Jack Layton are reported to have said that if the Green Party were included, they would not participate in the Leaders' Debates. Dion said that while he supports May's inclusion, he would not attend if Harper does not, and the Bloc Québécois has stated it will not boycott the debates if May is included.<ref>{{cite web | title=Green leader blames Harper, Layton for being barred from debates | work=canada.com | url=http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/story.html?id=ce3e7a10-554b-4aa7-ad89-5bef5927cd98 | access-date=September 9, 2008 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080916195727/http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/story.html?id=ce3e7a10-554b-4aa7-ad89-5bef5927cd98 | archive-date=September 16, 2008 | df=mdy-all }}</ref> The media consortium in charge of the debate, made up of the ], ], ] and ], had decided that it would prefer to broadcast the debates with the four major party leaders, rather than risk not at all or with minimal participation. The Green Party indicated they had begun procedures to lodge a formal complaint with the ],<ref>{{cite web | title=News Release - 2008 Leaders' Debates | work=CNW group | url=http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/September2008/08/c2613.html | access-date=September 9, 2008}}</ref><ref name="CBC08sep08">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/greens-can-t-participate-in-leaders-debates-networks-rule-1.757797 |title=Greens can't participate in leaders debates, networks rule |access-date=September 9, 2008 |last=] |date=September 8, 2008 |work=CBC News}}</ref> as they have in past federal elections. | |||
On September 10, Harper and Layton released statements that they would not oppose May's inclusion in the debate, citing public backlash and protests — with neither acknowledging making the threat of boycotting the debate — and that the media consortium would reconvene to discuss the matter. Layton stated that "debating about the debate" had become a "distraction", and that he had only one condition, that Stephen Harper be there. In response, spokespeople for Stephen Harper announced they would not stand alone in opposition to the Green Party's inclusion in the debates and also changed their position on the matter.<ref name="MayDebate"/> Later that day the consortium announced that May would be allowed to participate in the debate.<ref name="MayDebate"/> | |||
====Format change==== | |||
On September 30, Harper announced that he would ask for the 12 minutes on the economy scheduled for the Leader's Debate to be extended to an hour, citing that the ] "has deepened since the debate format was finalized", a change which would require agreement from the other parties in the debate to be approved. The NDP released a statement soon after that they supported the move, while public response has been concerned that other topics such as the environment would not end up with enough time to cover the issue.<ref name="cbc Harper asks for full hour on economy">{{cite news |title=More time set aside for economy during leaders' debates |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/more-time-set-aside-for-economy-during-leaders-debates-1.704383 |last = ] |date=September 30, 2008 |access-date=September 30, 2008 | work=CBC News}}</ref> | |||
On October 1, the day of the first debate, it was announced that both debates would get extended time, from 12 to 30 minutes, for the economy, and leaders would not give opening and closing statements, to allow for longer discussions on the economy without removing time from other topics. It was also revealed that instead of leaders standing at individual podiums for the debate, as had been done in past years, the debate would be done in a ] format.<ref name="cbc Economy dominate debate">{{cite news |title=Economy to dominate French-language debate |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/economy-to-dominate-french-language-debate-1.735821 |last = ] |date=October 1, 2008 |access-date=October 1, 2008 | work=CBC News}}</ref> | |||
====Debates==== | |||
=====French debate===== | |||
Much of the French debate revolved around the economy and the environment, with the two topics repeatedly being brought up in discussions allotted for other topics. Stephen Harper came under criticism from every other leader in nearly every topic, especially the economy and environment, with the other party leaders stating that Harper's politics had led to Canada's current crises in those two areas. Their points included that Harper's environmental plan was considered the worst of all developed countries by organizations around the world, with Elizabeth May labeling it "a type of fraud",<ref name="cbc Harper targeted in French Debate">{{cite news |title=Harper targeted on economy, crime in French debate |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-targeted-on-economy-crime-in-french-debate-1.754353 |last = ] |date=October 2, 2008 |access-date=October 2, 2008 | work=CBC News}}</ref> and that his attempts to remove regulations in the financial sectors, similar to those done by the ] in the United States, have led Canada to being nearly as hard hit by the ] as the United States.<ref name="cbc Harper targeted in French Debate" /> | |||
Continuous comparisons of Harper to ] were made over the course of the debate, with Jack Layton stating at one point that with Bush ending his presidency at the end of the year, Harper would be "the last leader of a developed country to follow the ]".<ref name="cbc Harper targeted in French Debate" /> | |||
=====English debate===== | |||
Following the same tone as the French debate, much of the discussion revolved around the economy and the environment. The other four leaders keep criticizing Harper, especially for his lack of an economic platform despite asking for the format change to focus more on the economy due to the ], and instead using the time to criticize the economic platforms of the other leaders.<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform" /> May lashed out at Harper for not understanding that Canadians were worried about their homes, jobs and finances, and comparing the current situation to ], Dion stated that the only thing that keeps Canada from being hit as hard by the crisis as the US are laws created by the previous Liberal government that the Conservatives had been attempting to overturn, Duceppe repeatedly criticized Harper for financial practices and attitudes similar to the ], and Layton at one point stated that Harper's position showed he was either incompetent or uncaring to the situation, and asked which one he was, to which Harper did not respond. Harper also came under criticism for his laissez-faire attitude to the job sector, supporting primarily the oil companies and companies that outsource jobs in the manufacturing sector. | |||
When it turned to the environment, the Carbon Tax proposal came up repeatedly, with both Dion and May supporting it, although May to more ambitious figures than Dion, pointing out it was the most recommended and proven way to deal with carbon emissions by countries and organizations around the world, noting the growth that Sweden and Germany have had with this system.<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform" /> Harper criticized the plan, saying would increase taxpayers' burden and that Dion should be "honest with the people" that some environmental measures will cost the economy and said the plan includes $40 billion in carbon taxes and $26 billion in tax cuts.<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform" /> Dion defended the Liberal's Green Shift, saying that " not true at all", and that "for every dollar that we will raise, you will have a tax cut, and these tax cuts will be on your income".<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform" /> Duceppe commented that he would like targets to be applied to individual provinces, thereby allowing Quebec to financially benefit due to already-implemented greenhouse gas reductions.<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform" /> Layton, who favours a ], said that it is a "figment of Mr. Harper's imagination" that emissions will fall under his plan.<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform" /> When Harper sought to outline his government's record on other environmental fronts, giving examples of his minority government supported the preservation of hundreds of thousands of hectares of environmentally sensitive land through the ], and that the government declared a protected marine area by ] and created a whale sanctuary by ], May responded by saying "The only word he said that's true is on national parks".<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform" /> | |||
Layton also criticized Dion for his lack of accomplishments as official opposition during the minority government, and his party's previous leader's broken promises in areas such as Child Care and Pharmacare.<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform" /> | |||
Duceppe painted the Conservative government's $45 million in national arts and culture funding cuts as an assault on the province's identity, saying "How can you recognize the Quebec nation and then cut culture , which is the soul of a nation?" followed by citing the economic benefits of culture.<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform" /> | |||
Harper also said he had erred in calling for Canada's participation in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, saying "It was absolutely an error, it's obviously clear", adding that the claim of weapons of mass destruction proved false.<ref name="cbc Leaders to Harper: Show economic Platform">{{cite news |title=Show us the platform, party leaders dare Harper on economy |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/show-us-the-platform-party-leaders-dare-harper-on-economy-1.721101 |last = ] |date=October 3, 2008 |access-date=October 3, 2008 | work=CBC News}}</ref> | |||
Commenting on the debate, Layton said that he "thoroughly enjoyed" May's contributions to the debate.<ref name="cbc Barbs fly over economy">{{cite news |title=Barbs fly over economy as leaders return to campaign trail |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/barbs-fly-over-economy-as-leaders-return-to-campaign-trail-1.716130 |last = ] |date=October 3, 2008 |access-date=October 3, 2008 | work=CBC News}}</ref> Reporter ] said that Harper managed to take the hits calmly, as "someone must have told him ... if you fight back or get too partisan, you're going to alienate voters, especially women".<ref name="cbc Barbs fly over economy"/> Duceppe said he was happy to have forced Harper to admit his support of joining the Iraq war in 2003 was a mistake, adding he will use the admission in the campaign as "Exhibit A" that the Conservative leader lacks solid judgment skills, and that Harper was weakened when he confirmed he does not support a refundable tax credit for the manufacturing industry to encourage companies to improve productivity.<ref name="cbc Barbs fly over economy"/> | |||
===Issues=== | |||
====Arts==== | |||
Stephen Harper had cut $45 million from arts funding while in office, a move that drew much criticism from the other leaders and ] citizens, with most leaders seeking to restore the funding. The Conservatives have stated that the money is being reallocated to other arts and cultural programs, including various official languages projects, the ] and projects connected with the ], although the Conservative's refusal to have a parliamentary review of their cuts and for a moratorium on the measures until the ] had a chance to hold hearings on culture and arts funding has most opposition members calling foul.<ref name="cbc Layton reverse Harper Art Cuts">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/layton-and-duceppe-protest-culture-cuts-in-montreal-1.750190 |title=Layton vows to reverse Harper arts cuts, bolster culture funding |publisher=CBC News |date=September 23, 2008 |access-date=September 23, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080924045506/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/layton-and-duceppe-protest-culture-cuts-in-montreal-1.750190 |archive-date=September 24, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
Both Stéphane Dion and Jack Layton have promised to reverse the cut, with Dion also promising to increase funding to ] to $360 million, while Layton also promised to bring income averaging for artists to the national level and providing an annual tax exemption of $20,000 for income earned by copyright and residuals, stating that "one of the key things we must do, before we start giving $50-billion tax giveaways to banks and oil companies, is to protect and promote the arts" and "stable, sure and appropriate funding" for ] while also protecting ] and the ].<ref name="cbc Layton reverse Harper Art Cuts"/> | |||
Harper has said that he believes that the issue is a "niche topic", and that "ordinary Canadians" are not particularly concerned with the issue.<ref name="cbc Actors condemn Harper">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/actors-condemn-harper-s-culture-cuts-1.735491 |title=Actors condemn Harper's culture cuts |publisher=CBC News |date=September 24, 2008 |access-date=September 24, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080926112951/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/actors-condemn-harper-s-culture-cuts-1.735491 |archive-date=September 26, 2008 }}</ref> A group of Canadian performers, which included ], ] and ], held a press conference on September 24, saying the cuts would cripple the Canadian arts industry.<ref name="cbc Actors condemn Harper"/> | |||
On September 29, Harper unveiled a new tax credit plan worth an estimated $150 million a year to encourage parents to enroll their kids in arts programs like music and drama. The credit will apply on up to $500 of eligible fees for children under 16 who participate in eligible arts activities. Harper said that " spend a lot more on culture and arts" but "in a way that we ensure is an effective use of taxpayers' money and ultimately, in this case, benefits families and all of society as well". Harper has come under criticism when the week before he expressed his opinion that "ordinary working people were unable to relate to taxpayer-subsidized cultural elites when they see them at a rich gala on television".<ref name="cp Harper offers kid's art tax break">{{cite news|url=http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jeUfgJm9yH22rTH5VaCrKj3HQQGg |title=Harper offers tax breaks to parents with kids in arts programs |publisher=The Canadian Press |date=September 30, 2008 |access-date=September 30, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081002083442/http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jeUfgJm9yH22rTH5VaCrKj3HQQGg |archive-date=October 2, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
====Alleged Cadman bribe attempt==== | |||
{{main|Chuck Cadman#Legal controversy}} | |||
In early 2008 it was alleged that Independent MP ] of ], who was terminally ill with cancer at the time, had been offered a million dollar life insurance policy in exchange for voting against the proposed Liberal budget in May 2005, which he turned down. Under section 119 of the ], it is illegal to bribe an MP. Accordingly, Opposition Liberal party Intergovernmental Affairs critic ] asked the ] (RCMP) in February 2008 to investigate this allegation. In May 2008, the RCMP announced that there was not enough evidence to support charges.<ref name="cbc-2008-05-16" >{{cite news | |||
|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/no-charges-to-be-laid-in-cadman-affair-rcmp-1.710397 | |||
|title=No charges to be laid in Cadman Affair: RCMP | |||
|publisher=CBC News | |||
|date=May 16, 2008 | |||
|access-date=July 9, 2008}}</ref> | |||
Cadman died in July. The following month, Harper stated in a court deposition that any such million-dollar offer would have to be authorized by him, and that he did not issue any such authorization.<ref>{{cite web | |||
|last=Cornell Catana Reporting Services | |||
|title=Stephen Harper, Sworn: Cross-Examination by Mr. Paliare | |||
|work=Macleans.ca | |||
|access-date=September 4, 2008 | |||
|date=September 4, 2008 | |||
|url=http://www.macleans.ca/files/pdf/harperdepo.pdf | |||
|url-status=dead | |||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080910215333/http://www.macleans.ca/files/pdf/harperdepo.pdf | |||
|archive-date=September 10, 2008 | |||
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news | |||
| last = Tim Naumetz | |||
| title = Harper testifies he authorized offer to Cadman | |||
| work = Globe and Mail | |||
| access-date = September 4, 2008 | |||
| date = September 4, 2008 | |||
| url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080904.CADMAN04/TPStory/TPNational/Politics/ | |||
| location=Toronto | |||
}}</ref> There is currently an ongoing legal battle between the Liberals and the Conservatives over the matter. | |||
On September 24, while campaigning in Surrey North, Stephen Harper's campaign team barred reporters from talking with the local Conservative candidate, ], who is Chuck Cadman's widow. The campaign team called in the ] (RCMP), and ordered them to "Keep out" while Cadman was taken away by staff. Harper spokesman ] later stated that he had not seen the incident, but the local candidates did not need to be interviewed, that "Local candidates' priority is campaigning in their local ridings, and not talking to the national media", and that it should be enough that they hold daily news conferences with the party's most prominent members.<ref name="cbc Tories use RCMP to block media">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/tories-use-rcmp-to-block-media-from-talking-to-candidate-cadman-1.741937 |title=Tories use RCMP to block media from talking to candidate Cadman |publisher=CBC News |date=September 24, 2008 |access-date=September 24, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080924121234/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/tories-use-rcmp-to-block-media-from-talking-to-candidate-cadman-1.741937 |archive-date=September 24, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
The incident has reminded people of Conservative tactics during the 2006 election, where attempts by the media to speak with local candidates were stopped by campaign personnel, especially the ] incident, where campaign officials forced Albrecht to stay in a restaurant kitchen when journalists attempted to interview him.<ref name="cbc Tories use RCMP to block media" /> | |||
The Conservatives chose former U.S. ] agent ] to analyze a tape of reporter ] interviewing Harper on the Cadman bribe attempt. The tape was a key piece of evidence in the ongoing legal battle. On October 10, Koenig announced that the tape had not been altered in any way, contrary to the claims by Stephen Harper that it had been altered.<ref name="cbc Cadman tape not altered" >{{cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/audio-expert-says-cadman-tape-not-altered-1.700925 | |||
|title=Audio expert says Cadman tape not altered | |||
|publisher=CBC News | |||
|date=October 10, 2008 | |||
|access-date=October 10, 2008}}</ref> | |||
====Canadian involvement in Afghanistan==== | |||
{{main|Canada's role in the invasion of Afghanistan}} | |||
The ongoing ] of the ] in ] may also influence voters. Desmond Morton, a political science professor at ] suggested that the Conservatives could be blamed for the war because they have extended the mission twice, despite the fact that it was then Liberal Leader ] who was Canada's prime minister when Canada's current military involvement in Afghanistan first started in 2001. Both the Conservatives and Liberals have at various times agreed to extend the mission(s) to at least 2011, so this may result in some Canadians who are strongly against Canada's ongoing involvement, who might have otherwise typically voted either Liberal or Conservative in the past, to take their votes elsewhere in 2008.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/deaths-in-afghanistan-could-hurt-tory-campaign-1.322721|title=Deaths in Afghanistan could hurt Tory campaign|access-date=September 8, 2008|publisher=]|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080916010359/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080907/election2008_afghanistan_080907/20080907?s_name=election2008&no_ads=|archive-date=September 16, 2008}}</ref> | |||
====Cities and infrastructure==== | |||
Toronto Mayor ] has spoken out that the parties need to focus more on cities and their infrastructure, stating that 8 out of 10 Canadians live in cities, and that so far only the ] has revealed a platform on the issue, with a national transit strategy and plans to give cities a permanent revenue source to help fix a growing infrastructure backlog. Miller stated he will not endorse a specific party, but urges people to choose a party that will "help cities thrive". He disagrees with Stephen Harper's opinion that "cities are not of national importance".<ref name="cbc Toronto mayor suggests Greens">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto-mayor-suggests-greens-best-bet-for-cities-1.770940 |title=Toronto mayor suggests Greens best bet for cities |publisher=CBC News |date=September 17, 2008 |access-date=September 17, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080919015841/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto-mayor-suggests-greens-best-bet-for-cities-1.770940 |archive-date=September 19, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
On September 18, Stéphane Dion pledged to spend more than $70 billion over the next 10 years to improve Canada's infrastructure if elected, and budget surpluses that exceed a $3-billion contingency fund to infrastructure projects, particularly those with a green focus, calling Canada's cities and towns "the engines of our economy". ] immediately lashed out at the spending proposal, saying Dion was "promising money no government could afford" and that the Conservative's infrastructure plans "are modest and affordable within the four-year budget we've published".<ref name="cbc Dion pledges $70B infrastructure">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/dion-promises-70b-infrastructure-boost-1.719785 |title=Dion promises $70B infrastructure boost |publisher=CBC News |date=September 18, 2008 |access-date=September 18, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080919111331/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/dion-promises-70b-infrastructure-boost-1.719785 |archive-date=September 19, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
On September 23, ] and Toronto mayors ] and David Miller laid out their demands for urban municipalities, describing cities' current financial problems as a national issue, saying that cities have become the country's economic, social and cultural development engines and need appropriate support, and that they need better "fiscal tools" to continue their role as Canada's economic engines or the country will suffer. They listed ], ], ] and overstretched ]s as just a few of the symptoms, that "These problems are too big and too important to be solved on the backs of property taxpayers" and that "in order to remain competitive, transport goods efficiently and attract new talent, our cities require quality infrastructure, affordable housing and first-rate recreational and cultural facilities". ], president of the ] and mayor of ], ], has stated that things like the ] were an important federal commitment, but that more is needed to tackle cities' overwhelming infrastructure needs.<ref name="cbc Cities need more power">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/cities-need-more-power-to-thrive-mayors-1.694120 |title=Cities need more power to thrive: mayors |publisher=CBC News |date=September 23, 2008 |access-date=September 23, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081208133806/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/cities-need-more-power-to-thrive-mayors-1.694120 |archive-date=December 8, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
On September 29, Layton announced plans to direct one cent per litre of the gas tax, approximately $400 million a year, into transit projects across the country, and direct $350 million from the sale of carbon permits to big polluters, saying that "the major polluters would be the ones paying to make transit greener, not you and your families", and that "fighting climate change requires investing in transit, and that's what our plan does".<ref name="cbc gas pays for Transit: Layton">{{cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/use-gas-tax-to-pay-for-public-transit-layton-1.706899 |title=Use gas tax to pay for public transit: Layton |publisher=CBC News |date=September 29, 2008 |access-date=September 30, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202045820/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/use-gas-tax-to-pay-for-public-transit-layton-1.706899 |archive-date=December 2, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
====Economy==== | |||
Polls have suggested that the ] is the major issue going into this election, especially with the resulting high price of gas, along with rising prices of other goods and services, such as food, and the possible impact the ] may have on Canada. Some experts say that Canada has just narrowly dodged a ], although the economy is in its worst shape since 1991.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story//20080906/economy_elxn_080906/20080906?&s_name=election2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080913130222/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/20080906/economy_elxn_080906/20080906?&s_name=election2008 |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 13, 2008 |last = CTV |title=CTV News Election 2008|access-date=September 12, 2008}}</ref> | |||
Both Dion and Harper have said that the others' plans will lead Canada into a recession, while Dion also stated that Harper has "mismanaged a once-booming economy into one with growth dropping to among the lowest of the ] nations".<ref name="cbc Dion pledges $70B infrastructure" /> | |||
The Conservatives have stated possible negative consequences that could happen to the economy based on Liberal ]s if they were to be elected.<ref name="cbc Dion pledges $70B infrastructure" /> As of September 20, 2008, Liberal election promises have totaled in excess of $80 billion spending over the next decade.<ref name="80B">{{cite web|title=Farming aid pushes Liberal pledges past $80B mark |url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=808864 |last=] |date=September 20, 2008 |access-date=September 20, 2008 }}{{dead link|date=September 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> In contrast, the cost of programs promised by the Conservatives to date is less than $2 billion annually.<ref name="80B"/> Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has criticized the Liberal's spending promises, saying they are making "mind-boggling" spending plans that he predicts would send Canada into deficit.<ref name="80B"/> | |||
After the rejection of the ] and resulting market fluctuation all over the world, including the ], Jack Layton called for Harper to call a special meeting for federal party leaders to discuss the potential effects of the U.S economic crisis on Canadians, suggestion the afternoon of October 1, since all leaders would be in Ottawa for the ] that night. A spokesman for Harper later reported that Harper would not call such a meeting, and to save discussion for the Leader's Debate, as " will have an opportunity later this week to debate—not behind closed doors but in front of all Canadians—the issues at stake not for our economy but for our country".<ref name="cbc PM rebuffs US crisis meeting">{{cite news |title=PM rebuffs NDP call for federal leaders' meeting on U.S. crisis |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/pm-rebuffs-ndp-call-for-federal-leaders-meeting-on-u-s-crisis-1.698072 |last = ] |date=September 30, 2008 |access-date=September 30, 2008 | work=CBC News}}</ref> Harper later announced that he would ask for the 12 minutes on the economy scheduled for the Leader's Debate to be extended to an hour, citing that the ] "has deepened since the debate format was finalized", a change which would require agreement from the other parties in the debate to be approved. The NDP released a statement soon after that they supported the move, while public response has been concerned that other topics such as the environment would not end up with enough time to cover the issue.<ref name="cbc Harper asks for full hour on economy" /> All the leaders supported the idea, and the opening and closing statements were dropped and the allotted time for the economy extended to 30 minutes without affecting the other topics.<ref name="cbc Economy dominate debate" /> | |||
During the Leaders' Debates Harper repeatedly came under fire for lack of an economic plan in the current time of crisis and while campaigning, and for his lack of ability to explain how he would deal with the current crisis, merely repeating that Canada was unlikely to face such a crisis as he had made "different choices" than the US while in power without being able to explain what those different choices were, as all of his examples were immediately compared to practices done by the ], and insisted that Canadians "don't panic". In response to mounting pressure from the public, Harper announced on October 3 that he would reveal his party's platform, including economic matters, on October 7, one week before the election.<ref name="cbc Barbs fly over economy" /> | |||
====Environment==== | |||
{{wikinews|Canadian scientists protest Harper's attacks on science}} | |||
Shortly after the election was called, Harper was criticized for using a four-vehicle ] that included a van and ] to travel the {{convert|395|m|abbr=on}} across the street from the door of ] to the door of ] to dissolve parliament.<ref name="drive"/> In return, the Conservatives criticized the Liberal party's decision to use a 29-year-old ] for campaigning, saying that the older airplane's poor fuel efficiency demonstrates hypocrisy on environmental matters. Daniel Lauzon, a spokesperson for the Liberals, denied their airplane was substantially less efficient than the Conservatives' ].<ref name="nationalpostfuel">{{cite news |url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=776106 |title=Fuel use of Liberal campaign jet under attack |access-date=September 12, 2008 |date=September 8, 2008 |first=Peter |last=Kuitenbrouwer |publisher=] }}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> | |||
The Tories have been previously criticized for backing out of Canada's commitments under the ].<ref name="slate canada">{{cite news |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2199929/ |title=What's the Matter With Canada? |first=Christopher |last=Flavelle |date=September 12, 2008 |publisher=] |access-date=September 12, 2008}}</ref> Their new plan requires industries to reduce the rate at which they generate ], with a goal of reducing overall emissions by 45 to 65 percent by 2050.<ref name="cbc cleanair">{{cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/tory-bill-aimed-at-cutting-greenhouse-gases-in-half-by-2050-1.588711 |title=Tory bill aimed at cutting greenhouse gases in half by 2050 |publisher=CBC News |date=October 9, 2006 |access-date=September 13, 2008}}</ref> The plan has been criticized by groups such as the ], who called it "completely inadequate".<ref name="Sierra Club Report Card">{{cite news | |||
| title=Greens tops, Tories flops in Sierra Club climate-change report card | |||
| url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/greens-tops-tories-flops-in-sierra-club-climate-change-report-card-1.771299 | |||
| work=] | |||
| date=September 5, 2008 | |||
| access-date=September 7, 2008}}</ref> Criticism has focused on the use of "intensity-based" targets, for which emission reductions are relative to overall production, so overall emissions could potentially increase if production also increases.<ref name="cbc cleanair"/> This is in contrast to a "hard cap" on emissions, for which the overall amount cannot increase. The Conservatives' plan includes a hard cap to begin in 2020 or 2025,<ref name="cbc cleanair"/> while environmental groups have advocated for an immediate hard cap.<ref name="cbc cleanair" /><ref name="Sierra Club Report Card"/> | |||
The Liberals have developed a "]" plan, creating a ] that will be coupled with reductions to ] rates. The proposal was to tax ], starting at $10 (Canadian) per ton of CO<sub>2</sub> and reaching $40 (Canadian) per ton within four years. The plan would engage in revenue recycling by matching the tax with reductions in the income tax.<ref>Jones, Nicola. "Green issues dominate election: Climate change is high on Canadian agenda." Nature, September 17, 2008</ref> Criticism of the Green Shift plan has focused on its economic effects, with the Conservatives predicting it would cause a "big recession".<ref name="cpcarbontax">{{cite news|url=http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5guTSMQRJqWWNB97ASPKDGOMEpQvA |title=Liberal carbon tax threatens national unity, economy: Harper |publisher=] |date=September 12, 2008 |access-date=September 12, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080914030144/http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5guTSMQRJqWWNB97ASPKDGOMEpQvA |archive-date=September 14, 2008 }}</ref> When pressed by reporters to provide evidence of this impact, Harper "wasn't able to cite a study that specifically modelled the impact of the Liberal Green Shift plan",<ref name="greenshiftrecession">{{Cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080911.welxnharper0911/BNStory |title=Tory's 'recession' threat based on old numbers |publisher=] |date=September 11, 2008 |access-date=October 2, 2008 |location=Toronto |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090116084907/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080911.welxnharper0911/BNStory |archive-date=January 16, 2009 }}</ref> instead citing an older economic model about the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol. | |||
One ]ing association claimed the Liberal carbon tax plan could put up to 10,000 jobs in jeopardy in Moncton alone.<ref name="canadaeast truckers">{{cite news |url=http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/news/article/408284 |title=Atlantic director says Liberal proposal jeopardizes 10,000 Hub City jobs, will cost industry another $500M a year |publisher=Canadaeast News Service |first=David |last=Shipley |date=September 8, 2008 |access-date=September 12, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080913142914/http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/news/article/408284 |archive-date=September 13, 2008 }}</ref> Environmental activist ] has come out in support of Dion's plan, saying "To oppose , it's just nonsense. It's certainly the way we got to go"<ref name="Suzuki For Dion">{{cite news |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/suzuki-slams-ndp-tories-backs-dion-s-carbon-tax-1.296690 |title=Suzuki slams NDP, Tories, backs Dion's carbon tax |publisher=] |date=May 18, 2008 |access-date=September 12, 2008 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080529141851/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080518/carbontax_liberals_080518?s_name=&no_ads= |archive-date=May 29, 2008 }}</ref> and giving an interview explaining why it is the most effective way to solve the environmental crisis.<ref name="cbc Suzuki explains carbon tax">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/david-suzuki-explains-why-he-thinks-a-carbon-tax-is-the-way-to-go-1.722737 |title=David Suzuki explains why he thinks a carbon tax is the way to go |publisher=] |date=October 1, 2008 |access-date=October 2, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081006132344/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/david-suzuki-explains-why-he-thinks-a-carbon-tax-is-the-way-to-go-1.722737 |archive-date=October 6, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
The NDP's plan for the environment has focused on ], claiming their system will decrease greenhouse emissions by 80% by 2050.<ref name="tostar ndp environment">{{cite news |url=https://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/497925 |title=Layton hypes green strategy |first=Richard |last=Brennan |publisher=] |date=September 12, 2008 |access-date=September 13, 2008}}</ref> The plan includes a series of financial incentives to retrofit ] systems and transition the economy to be "]". The plan would also halt new ] development until emissions have been capped.<ref name="np ndp environment">{{cite news |url=http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2008/09/11/ndp-calls-for-80-greenhouse-gas-emission-reduction-by-2050.aspx |title=Layton lays out NDP's environment platform |publisher=The ] |first=Chris |last=Boutet |date=September 11, 2008 |access-date=September 13, 2008 }}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Layton has also criticized the Liberal carbon tax plan, stating it taxes families instead of polluters.<ref name="ctv layton carbon">{{cite news |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/layton-calls-liberal-carbon-tax-wrong-1.322791 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130115105855/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080907/election2008_2_080911/20080911?s_name=election2008 |url-status=live |archive-date=January 15, 2013 |title=Layton calls Liberal carbon tax 'wrong' |publisher=] |date=September 11, 2008 |access-date=September 13, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
====Equalization==== | |||
{{main|Anything But Conservative}} | |||
], the ] premier of ], launched a campaign called ], primarily targeted at Harper and the federal Conservatives. He opposes a Conservative majority, due in part to Harper's promise during the 2006 election to modify the ] formula to fully share offshore oil revenues with the province, which Williams says Harper has broken, and what Harper has stated he will do with a majority government.<ref name="gam Harper: Canada more Conservative">{{cite news |title=Harper: Canada a more conservative country |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080913.wconservative0913/BNStory/politics/home |last = ] |date=September 13, 2008 |access-date=October 3, 2008 |location=Toronto |work=The Globe and Mail}}</ref> Accordingly, all but one member of the provincial PC caucus supported not voting Conservative in this election.{{Citation needed|date=October 2008}} | |||
Leo Power, a veteran of federal politics and the Conservative Party of Canada's campaign co-chair for Newfoundland and Labrador, said raising money and recruiting volunteers has proved difficult, and blames Williams's ABC campaign, saying it has cut deep into the federal election machine that is struggling to compete. Power has also said his party's best hope of winning a seat in the province is in the riding of ] with incumbent candidate ].<ref name="cbc Tory org Blames ABC">{{cite news |title=Tory organizer blames ABC campaign for party's woes |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/tory-organizer-blames-abc-campaign-for-party-s-woes-1.706869l |last = ] |date=October 3, 2008 |access-date=October 3, 2008 | work=CBC News}}</ref> Manning was defeated by Liberal ], while ] and ], which were represented by Conservatives not running for re-election, were won by the NDP and Liberals, respectively, leaving the Conservatives with no representatives in Newfoundland and Labrador. | |||
====Leadership==== | |||
Since before the election was announced, the Conservative party ran attack ads about Dion, saying he was not a capable leader. Dion criticized the Conservatives for running the ads.<ref>{{cite news |title=Tories launch attack ads aimed at Dion |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/tories-launch-attack-ads-aimed-at-dion-1.642528 |work=CBC News |date=January 29, 2007}}</ref> | |||
On October 9, Stephen Harper called into question the abilities of Liberal leader Dion after footage from the false starts of an interview on ], and later rebroadcast on '']'', were aired to the public, and criticized Dion's grasp of the English language and the strength of the Liberals' plan for the Canadian economy. In the footage Dion repeatedly failed to understand the ] construction used by the interviewer in a single repeatedly asked question. | |||
The footage shows interviewer ] asking Dion the question: "If you were the Prime Minister now, what would you have done about the economy, and this crisis, that Mr. Harper has not done?". Dion had difficulty in understanding the question, repeatedly asking Murphy to clarify if he meant if Dion was Prime Minister now, next Tuesday on election day, last week, last month, 60 weeks ago, or two and a half years ago. Eventually, after three start overs to the interview, Dion responded with what he would do if elected Prime Minister in the future. CTV initially agreed to restart the interviews and not air the false starts but changed their minds and announced that they felt it was their responsibility to show it.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2008/10/10/stephane-dion-responds-to-interview-gaffe-it-was-difficult-to-understand-and-harper-has-no-class.aspx|title=Stéphane Dion responds to interview gaffe: It was 'difficult to understand' and Harper has 'no class'|last=Yum|first=Kenny|date=October 10, 2008|publisher=National Post|access-date=October 12, 2008}}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Harper responded to the clips by saying that "When you're running a trillion-and-a-half-dollar economy you don't get a chance to have do-overs, over and over again" and "What this incident actually indicates very clearly is Mr. Dion and the Liberal Party really don't know what they would do on the economy", and when told that the difficulties were in part due to English being Dion's second language, Harper said: "I don't think this is a question of language at all. The question was very clear. It was asked repeatedly".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/10/09/not-st-233-phane-dion-s-finest-hour.aspx |title=Not Stéphane Dion's finest hour - Full Comment |publisher=Network.nationalpost.com |access-date=October 16, 2008 }}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/article/515212 |title=TheStar.com - Federal Election - Tories show video to play up Dion's language difficulties |work=Thestar.com |author=ATV |date= October 9, 2008|access-date=October 16, 2008 | location=Toronto}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/conservatives-jump-on-dion-interview-1.765901 |title=CBC.ca - Canada Votes - Conservatives jump on Dion interview |publisher=Cbc.ca |author=CBC News |date= October 9, 2008|access-date=October 16, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081009.welxndionatv1009/BNStory/politics/home?cid=al_gam_mostview |title=https://www.theglobeandmail.com: Liberals slam Tories for 'shamelessly' attacking Dion |publisher=Theglobeandmail.com |author=Tu Thanh Ha And Jane Taber And Steven Chase |access-date=October 16, 2008 |location=Toronto}}</ref> | |||
], a spokesman for Dion, accused the Tories of making fun of the Liberal leader's hearing issues. Dion responded to Harper's comments, saying Harper had "no class", saying "I did not understand the question", and "Maybe it's because I have a hearing problem, maybe because my second language, but I did not understand the question".<ref name="cbc Dion Strikes Back">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/dion-strikes-back-at-harper-s-criticisms-of-his-leadership-1.743230 |title=Dion strikes back at Harper's criticisms of his leadership |access-date=October 10, 2008 |last=] |date=October 2008 |work=CBC News |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081013162714/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/dion-strikes-back-at-harper-s-criticisms-of-his-leadership-1.743230 |archive-date=October 13, 2008 }}</ref> Both the Conservatives and the CTV have come under criticism for their handling of the footage, but they have stated they stand by their actions.<ref name="cbc Dion Strikes Back" /> Duceppe has called Harper's comments a "double standard", saying that many English-speaking politicians have little or no ability to speak French, yet francophones are somehow always expected to be perfect, and that the attack was an attempted "low blow". But Duceppe also took the opportunity to criticise Dion, suggesting he understood the question. "The real question is that I think Dion understood the question. The real problem wasn't the language, it was the substance," Duceppe said, "He had nothing to say".<ref name="cbc Harper's Double Standards: Duceppe">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-s-criticism-of-dion-interview-double-standard-duceppe-1.757601 |title=Harper's criticism of Dion interview 'double standard': Duceppe |access-date=October 10, 2008 |last=] |date=October 2008 |work=CBC News |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081014215530/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-s-criticism-of-dion-interview-double-standard-duceppe-1.757601 |archive-date=October 14, 2008 }}</ref> Layton also defended Dion, saying he has "struggled with questions, too".<ref name="cbc Harper's Double Standards: Duceppe" /> | |||
Former Prime Minister ] has come out criticizing Harper's leadership abilities, noting especially Harper's controlling ways with his cabinet ministers, saying he would have quit if former prime minister ] had treated him that way, that "Mr. Dion was a minister for nine years. And Mr. Harper arrived there with no experience and it shows", that the phrase 'Tory times are bad times', in use since the 1930s, was still true and that "Harper destroyed 50 years of relationships with China", Canada's second biggest trading partner after the US, noting both past Liberal and Progressive Conservative governments sought to maintain its dealings with the key trading partner. Former Prime Minister ] has also supported Dion's plans and abilities, and many have noted Dion's ability to get both Chrétien and Martin to support him, despite Chrétien and Martin's ongoing feud.<ref name="cbc 'Tory times are bad times': Chrétien">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/tory-times-are-bad-times-chr%C3%A9tien-1.722970 |title='Tory times are bad times': Chrétien |access-date=October 10, 2008 |last=] |date=October 10, 2008 |work=CBC News}}</ref> | |||
====Listeriosis outbreak==== | |||
{{main|2008 Canadian listeriosis outbreak}} | |||
The ] ], who has already been criticized by Canada's food scientists for his handling of the ],<ref name="CBC:Food Union against Ritz">{{cite news|title=Food scientists' union joins opposition calls for Ritz's firing |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/food-scientists-union-joins-opposition-calls-for-ritz-s-firing-1.740608 |work=] |date=September 20, 2008 |access-date=September 20, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080923054217/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/food-scientists-union-joins-opposition-calls-for-ritz-s-firing-1.740608 |archive-date=September 23, 2008 }}</ref> has also been criticized for making inappropriate comments, further angering the families of those affected.{{Citation needed|date=October 2008}} Ritz had joked about the outbreak while he was on a conference call with scientists and political staffers on August 30, saying the political fallout from the outbreak was "like a death by a thousand cuts, or should I say cold cuts". In addition, when he was informed of a listeriosis-related death in ], he quipped: "Please tell me it's ]". Despite calls for Ritz's resignation from the other parties and the public, Stephen Harper has supported Ritz and rebuffed calls for his resignation.<ref name="Families angry about Ritz">{{cite news | |||
| title=Families angry about Ritz's listeriosis jokes | |||
| url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/families-angry-about-ritz-s-listeriosis-jokes-1.725535 | |||
| work=] | |||
| date=September 18, 2008 | |||
| access-date=September 19, 2008}}</ref> | |||
The ] revealed to the media that the Conservative party plans to cut federal funding to meat inspection programs by $3 million, effectively ending their operation in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and British Columbia.<ref name="Conservatives pull meat inspection">{{cite news | |||
| title=Conservatives to pull out of provincial meat inspection programs if elected: union | |||
| url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/conservatives-to-pull-out-of-provincial-meat-inspection-programs-if-elected-union-1.772620 | |||
| work=] | |||
| date=September 19, 2008 | |||
| access-date=September 19, 2008}}</ref> | |||
====Speech plagiarism==== | |||
On September 30, it was revealed by ] of the Liberal Party that on March 20, 2003, Stephen Harper had ] a speech that called for troops to be ] from Australian Prime Minister ], which Howard had delivered two days before, on March 18.<ref name="cbc Harper plagiarizes speech on Iraq">{{cite news|title=Liberals accuse Harper of plagiarizing speech on Iraq |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-staffer-quits-over-plagiarized-2003-speech-on-iraq-1.756590 |work=] |date=September 30, 2008 |access-date=September 30, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081006132253/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-staffer-quits-over-plagiarized-2003-speech-on-iraq-1.756590 |archive-date=October 6, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
Following Rae's statement, Harper's spokesman ] dismissed the issue as irrelevant, saying "I'm not going to get into a debate about a five-year-old speech that was delivered three Parliaments ago, two elections ago, when the prime minister was the leader of a party that no longer exists".<ref name="cbc Harper plagiarizes speech on Iraq" /> | |||
The Canadian Alliance staff member and former ] policy analyst, Owen Lippert, who wrote that speech was working on the current election campaign at Conservative campaign headquarters. On September 30, 2008 he issued a statement and resigned as a result of the incident.<ref name="CBCplagiarize">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-staffer-quits-over-plagiarized-2003-speech-on-iraq-1.756590 |title=Harper staffer quits over plagiarized 2003 speech on Iraq |access-date=October 2, 2008 |last=] |date=September 2008 |work=CBC News |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081006132253/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-staffer-quits-over-plagiarized-2003-speech-on-iraq-1.756590 |archive-date=October 6, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
He stated: | |||
{{blockquote|Pressed for time, I was overzealous in copying segments of another world leader's speech. Neither my superiors in the Office of the Leader of the Opposition nor the leader of the Opposition was aware that I had done so.<ref name="CBCplagiarize" /> }} | |||
On October 3, there was a second plagiarism allegation from the Liberals, who said that Harper had copied several sentences from a speech by former Ontario premier ]. Harper denied the allegation, saying "we're talking about a couple of sentences of fairly standard political rhetoric".<ref>. ''CBC News''. October 4, 2008.</ref> | |||
On October 6, the Conservatives contended that Dion had also committed plagiarism when, as Minister of the Environment in 2005, he went to a ] conference on climate change to deliver a speech which had substantial similarities to the executive summary of a year old UN report. The Liberal party did not respond to the plagiarism allegation.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/513799 |title=TheStar.com - Tories accuse Dion of plagiarism |work=Thestar.com |date= October 8, 2008|access-date=October 16, 2008 | location=Toronto | first=Les | last=Whittington}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://toronto.citynews.ca/2008/10/07/turnaround-tories-claim-stephane-dion-plagiarized-someone-elses-speech/ |title=CityNews: Turnaround: Tories Claim Stéphane Dion Plagiarized Someone Else's Speech |publisher=Citynews.ca |author=CityNews.ca Staff |date=October 7, 2008 |access-date=October 16, 2008 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081011053121/http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_27724.aspx |archive-date=October 11, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
==Controversies== | |||
===Missing ballot boxes=== | |||
] | |||
In ], several ballot boxes containing votes from advance polls disappeared after the close of advance polling on October 7. The boxes were stored in a closet at the home of a deputy returning officer.<ref name="ballotbox">{{Cite news | |||
|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20081013.ELECTIONBALLOTS13SB/TPStory/National | |||
|title=Missing ballot boxes recovered in Quebec | |||
|last=Séguin | |||
|first=Rhéal | |||
|date=October 13, 2008 | |||
|access-date=October 14, 2008 | |||
|location=Toronto | |||
|work=The Globe and Mail}}</ref> Although there was no tampering of the boxes or the votes, three deputy returning officers were fired.<ref name="ROfired">{{cite news | |||
|url=https://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/516760 | |||
|title=Elections Canada fires 3 officials over missing ballot boxes | |||
|publisher=] | |||
|date=October 14, 2008 | |||
|access-date=October 14, 2008}}</ref> Deputy returning officers are the only polling officials allowed to handle ballots during the vote count and the law did allow for them to store the sealed boxes as may be necessary in large remote rural ridings. However the boxes were returned a day late after the riding returning officer ordered their return.<ref name="ROfired2">{{cite web | |||
|url = https://www.ctvnews.ca/workers-dismissed-after-missing-ballot-boxes-found-1.332610 | |||
|title = Workers dismissed after missing ballot boxes found | |||
|publisher = ] | |||
|date = October 13, 2008 | |||
|access-date = December 5, 2008 | |||
|url-status = live | |||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110505084835/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081010/scrutineers_election2008_081013?s_name=election2008&no_ads= | |||
|archive-date = May 5, 2011 | |||
|df = mdy-all | |||
}}</ref> | |||
===Strategic voting=== | |||
A number of political leaders and popular websites supported ] in the election, mostly against the Conservative Party. The reasons varied from regional, such as ] premier ] and his "]" campaign, to ideological. The popular website VoteForEnvironment.ca, which received over one million page views in the first 12 days of its existence<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706184508/http://www.londontopic.ca/article.php?artid=11132 |date=July 6, 2011 }} ''LondonTopic.ca''. October 6, 2008.</ref> and whose founders were interviewed on CBC and other mainstream media, showed regional breakdowns per riding and offered recommendations based on which candidate was most likely to beat the Conservative candidate. If the Conservative candidate had little chance of winning the riding or was strongly entrenched, the site recommended "vote with your heart". Similarly, a vote swapping organization on ] entitled "Anti-Harper Vote Swap Canada" also gained press.<ref name="vote_swap">{{cite web | |||
|url=https://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2008/10/09/StratVote/ | |||
|title=Strategic Voting 2.0 | |||
|last=Thompson | |||
|first=David | |||
|publisher=] | |||
|date=October 9, 2008 | |||
|access-date=October 14, 2008}}</ref> The premise of that organization is that eligible voters in different electoral districts may exchange their votes, so that an opponent of a Conservative candidate in each district might have a better chance of being elected in that district. Elections Canada deemed the practice legal.<ref name="legal_swap">{{cite news | |||
|url=https://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/516769 | |||
|title=7,000 ready to swap votes | |||
|publisher=] | |||
|date=October 14, 2008 | |||
|access-date=October 14, 2008}}</ref> | |||
Green Party leader Elizabeth May sent out mixed signals about strategic voting. On October 12, she recommended that in close ridings, supporters of green policies should consider voting for the NDP or Liberals to defeat the Conservatives,<ref>Tutton, Michael. . ''The Toronto Star''. October 12, 2008.</ref> but on the same day she said: "I do not support strategic voting and I have not advised voters to choose any candidate other than Green".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081014120430/http://news.aol.ca/article/may-strategic/377529/ |date=October 14, 2008 }}. ''CBC News''. October 12, 2008.</ref> In addition, during the final days of the campaign the Liberals attempted to attract strategic NDP and Green votes to stop the Conservatives, and the Conservatives attempted to attract Bloc votes to stop the Liberals.<ref>. ''The Canadian Press''. October 12, 2008. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081017005354/http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jqbY2PX4an9d4mAwcAheUmCmasxA |date=October 17, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
===Voter identification=== | |||
Some students, homeless, and transient voters were turned away at the polls when they were unable to provide identification showing or otherwise confirming a place of residence. Legislation introduced in 2007 requires all voters to show one or two pieces of identification which confirm the voter's name and address, or to be vouched for by another voter who is able to show such identification.<ref>{{cite news|title=New ID rules cause confusion at polls |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-id-rules-cause-confusion-at-polls-1.713032 |publisher=] |date=October 14, 2008 |access-date=October 15, 2008}}</ref> | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="float:right;" | |||
|- | |||
! Region !! Turnout (%) | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|52.9 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|61.0 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|56.8 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|62.8 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|48.1 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|48.6 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|60.7 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|49.4 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|59.1 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|69.5 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|59.4 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|61.1 | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|63.7 | |||
|} | |||
===Voter turnout=== | |||
{{See also|Voter turnout in Canada}} | |||
] at 58.8% was the lowest in Canadian election history.<ref>{{cite web|last=Pomfret|first=R|title=Voter Turnout at Federal Elections and Referendums|url=http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=ele&dir=turn&document=index&lang=e|work=Elections Canada Online|publisher=Elections Canada|access-date=February 10, 2012}}</ref> All federally funded parties except for the Greens attracted fewer total votes than in 2006; the Greens received nearly 280,000 more votes. The Conservatives lost about 170,000 votes, the Liberals 850,000, the Bloc 170,000 and the NDP 70,000. Some voters were at first turned away because of failure to meet new and stricter proof of address requirements, including 2/3 of those attempting to vote at ], for example. The effect this may have had on voter turnout is unknown.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/polls-close-in-nova-scotia-1.751794 |work=CBC News |title=Polls close in Nova Scotia |date=October 14, 2008}}</ref> | |||
===Judicial recounts=== | |||
In a federal election, a ] is automatically ordered in a riding where the ] is less than 0.1% (one one-thousandth) of the votes cast. In cases where there is a larger but still narrow margin of victory, an elector can request a judicial recount. | |||
Judicial recounts were ordered in six ridings. In one case, ], the judicial recount overturned the reported victor, giving the seat to the Liberals' ] instead of the Bloc incumbent ]. | |||
In four other ridings, the recount confirmed the election results, although Liberal ]'s margin in Vancouver South was reduced from 33 votes to just 20.<ref>{{Dead link|date=November 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081108130621/http://www.elections.ca/enr/recounts/59034_e.htm |date=November 8, 2008 }}</ref> This was the slimmest victory of any riding in the entire election, until the results of the Kitchener-Waterloo recount reduced Peter Braid's margin of victory to a mere 17 votes. Dosanjh's Conservative opponent, Wai Young, appealed the recount to the ], citing that not all of the ballot boxes were fully recounted.<ref>, '']'', October 28, 2008.</ref> All ballots were eventually counted by November 4, confirming Dosanjh's victory by 20 votes, after the initial partial recount indicated a margin of 22 votes. | |||
In a sixth riding, the recount was cancelled when the elector who had requested it withdrew the request. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! rowspan=2| Riding | |||
! colspan=4| Initial validated results - First and second place | |||
! rowspan=2| Recount type | |||
! rowspan=2| Recount date | |||
! colspan=4| Judicially certified results - First and second place | |||
|- | |||
! | |||
! Candidate | |||
! Votes | |||
! % | |||
! | |||
! Candidate | |||
! Votes | |||
! % | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2| ], PEI | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 8,122 | |||
| 44.0% | |||
| rowspan=2| Requested | |||
| rowspan=2| October 23, 2008 | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 8,110 | |||
| 43.9% | |||
|- | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 8,060 | |||
| 43.6% | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 8,055 | |||
| 43.6% | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2| ], QC | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 19,202 | |||
| 32.6% | |||
| rowspan=2| Requested | |||
| rowspan=2| October 24, 2008 | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 19,103 | |||
| 32.6% | |||
|- | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 19,110 | |||
| 32.4% | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 19,034 | |||
| 32.5% | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2| ], ON | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 21,739 | |||
| 40.3% | |||
| rowspan=2| Requested | |||
| rowspan=2| November 6, 2008 | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 21,746 | |||
| 40.3% | |||
|- | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 21,516 | |||
| 39.9% | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 21,515 | |||
| 39.9% | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2| ], ON | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 21,851 | |||
| 36.1% | |||
| rowspan=2| Automatic | |||
| rowspan=2| October 31, 2008 | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 21,830 | |||
| 36.1% | |||
|- | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 21,803 | |||
| 36.0% | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 21,813 | |||
| 36.0% | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2| ], BC | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 20,042 | |||
| 34.2% | |||
| rowspan=2| Requested | |||
| rowspan=2 colspan=5 | ''Judicial recount terminated at the request of the elector who had requested it'' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 19,974 | |||
| 34.1% | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2| ], BC | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 16,101 | |||
| 38.5% | |||
| rowspan=2| Automatic | |||
| rowspan=2| November 4, 2008 | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 16,110 | |||
| 38.5% | |||
|- | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 16,068 | |||
| 38.4% | |||
| {{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
| ], ] | |||
| 16,090 | |||
| 38.4% | |||
|} | |||
====Candidates==== | |||
=====Conservative===== | |||
Chris Reid, the Conservative candidate from ], resigned over controversial statements on his blog, which advocated revising Canadian ] legislation to legalize ] of handguns.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/504069 |title=TheStar.com |date=September 23, 2008 |access-date=February 2, 2012 |location=Toronto |first=Petti |last=Fong}}</ref> He was replaced by David Gentili. | |||
The Conservatives apologized after an aide to ] candidate ] told ] protesters that they were free to meet with Cannon "if you behave and you're sober and there's no problems and if you don't do a sit down and whatever".<ref>{{cite news| last = Curry| first = Bill| title = Tories apologize for 'sober' remark to aboriginal protester| publisher = ]| date = September 18, 2008| url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080918.welxncanapolgy0918/BNStory/Front| access-date = November 28, 2008| location=Toronto}}</ref> | |||
=====Liberal===== | |||
Liberal candidate Simon Bédard was also asked to resign after he reiterated his 1990 comments, suggesting that lethal force should have been used in the ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Ottawa |first=The |url=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=e8e54944-b517-4728-b263-219b3787d619 |title=Ottawa Citizen |publisher=Canada.com |date=September 12, 2008 |access-date=February 2, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121108105335/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=e8e54944-b517-4728-b263-219b3787d619 |archive-date=November 8, 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Gazette |first=Montreal |url=http://www.canada.com/topics/news/features/decisioncanada/story.html?id=cdbe8c09-5c11-402f-9817-c321c4ff75a8 |title=Canada.com |publisher=Canada.com |date=September 11, 2008 |access-date=February 2, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121108105403/http://www.canada.com/topics/news/features/decisioncanada/story.html?id=cdbe8c09-5c11-402f-9817-c321c4ff75a8 |archive-date=November 8, 2012 }}</ref> | |||
Liberal candidate Lesley Hughes was dropped by the Liberal Party after making controversial comments about the ]. She continued to campaign as an independent, though she appeared as a Liberal on the ballot.<ref>{{dead link|date=February 2012}}</ref> | |||
=====NDP===== | |||
Andrew McKeever, an NDP candidate in ], announced on October 3 that he would resign from the election campaign after it was revealed that he had posted comments on ] in which he called one war activist a "fascist bitch" and threatened to beat up another person. Mr. McKeever wrote comments peppered with expletives and calling the operators of a war resister website "Nazis". McKeever was also quoted as saying "I like the part in ''Schindler's List'' when the guard starts waxing the prisoners." McKeever's decision to drop out of the race came with just over a week left in the campaign, meaning his name would remain on the ballot. One week before the publication of McKeever's resignation, NDP leader Jack Layton defended McKeever and refused to make him step down. | |||
Julian West, the candidate for the riding of ], dropped out of the race after details surfaced about an environmental event he attended 12 years ago when he went skinny-dipping and asked two teenagers to body-paint him. Two other candidates in British Columbia who were proponents of marijuana decriminalization — ] and Kirk Tousaw — resigned earlier after videos they had produced for Internet site Pot-TV were released to the media. One of the videos, filmed in 2000, showed Mr. Larsen, former leader of the ], preparing to light up a joint before driving a car, after having taken the short-acting hallucinogenic drug DMT earlier in the evening.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2008/10/04/facebook-flame-war-forces-ndp-candidate-to-resign.aspx |title=National Post |access-date=October 18, 2008 }}{{dead link|date=April 2019|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://pot-tv.net/archive/shows/pottvshowse-403.html |title = POT-TV: Weedy Wednesday Smokefest - DMT and Mushrooms |access-date=October 19, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080921050702/http://www.pot-tv.net/archive/shows/pottvshowse-403.html |archive-date=September 21, 2008 }}</ref> | |||
=====Green===== | |||
John Shavluk, the Green candidate in ], was removed from the party's slate of candidates on September 4, just before the election call, after it was revealed that he had previously published comments in his blog about the ] in 2001, in which he referred to the ] as "the shoddily built Jewish world bank headquarters".<ref>{{cite web|last=McNair|first=Adrian|title=Elizabeth May and the John Shavluk Story {{!}} Unambiguously Ambidextrous|url=http://unambig.com/elizabeth-may-and-the-john-shavluk-story/|access-date=April 25, 2013}}</ref> He was replaced by Liz Walker as the Green Party candidate, but remained on the ballot as an independent. | |||
=====Independent===== | |||
At an all-candidates debate staged for a high school student audience in ] on September 29, independent candidate David Popescu responded to a question about same-sex marriage by stating that "homosexuals should be executed". His remarks were widely criticized across Canada, and the ] announced an investigation into whether the comments constituted a crime under Canadian ] legislation.<ref name=Canwest1> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081210195118/http://www.canada.com/topics/news/features/decisioncanada/story.html?id=015205ac-a93c-4239-8e4f-abbc1d6bb836 |date=December 10, 2008 }}, Canwest News Service, October 1, 2008.</ref> He was subsequently investigated by the ] as well, after a radio interview on October 2 in which he specifically advocated the execution of ] executive director ].<ref>, ], October 8, 2008.</ref> | |||
====Vandalism==== | |||
Supporters of Ontario Liberal MPs ] (]) and ] (]) who had Liberal signs outside their houses were subject to ] during the later hours of October 3, including graffiti, phone and cable lines being cut, and damage to vehicles that included brake cutting. Toronto police reported over 30 incidents of vandalism as of October 6.<ref>, '']'', October 6, 2008</ref> Some of the victims did not realize their brakes had been cut until they were in traffic, and there was at least one near-accident.<ref>, '']'', October 6, 2008</ref> Liberal Senator ] was one of the residents who reported vandalism to his car.<ref name="grafstein">, '']'', October 11, 2008.</ref> | |||
Vandalism was also reported at the campaign offices of Trinity—Spadina Liberal candidate Christine Innes and Beaches—East York ] candidate ],<ref name="grafstein"/> as well as in Niagara Falls.<ref name="Niagara Falls Review"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081020101609/http://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1237572 |date=October 20, 2008 }}, Niagara Falls Review, October 8, 2008.</ref> | |||
====Legality of the election==== | |||
After the election was called, ], an Ottawa-based advocacy group, filed a legal suit claiming that the election call was illegal<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/article/692575|title=Judge to rule if 2008 Harper election call legal | work=The Star | location=Toronto | first=Sue | last=Bailey | date=September 8, 2009 | access-date=April 28, 2010}}</ref> because it violated the 2007 amendments to the ]. These amendments, introduced by the Harper government, set fixed dates for elections, and fulfilled a 2006 promise made by Harper to end the Prime Minister's ability to call snap elections. | |||
On September 17, 2009, the ] ruled that the election was not unfair, and therefore not illegal. Democracy Watch's appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal was also dismissed, and the Supreme Court denied leave to hear a further appeal.<ref>{{cite news |first=Sue |last=Bailey |title=Supreme Court will not weigh in on Harper fixed-election case |url=https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/925158--supreme-court-will-not-weigh-in-on-harper-fixed-election-case |agency=The Canadian Press |newspaper=The Toronto Star |date=January 20, 2011 |access-date=April 12, 2011 }}</ref> | |||
==Target seats== | |||
The following is a list of ridings which had narrowly been lost by the indicated party in the 2006 election. For instance, under the Liberal column are the 15 seats in which they came closest to winning but did not. Listed is the name of the riding, followed by the party which was victorious (in parentheses) and the margin, in terms of percentage of the vote, by which the party lost. | |||
These ridings were targeted by the specified party because the party had lost them by a very slim margin in the 2006 election. | |||
Up to 15 are shown, with a maximum margin of victory of 15%. | Up to 15 are shown, with a maximum margin of victory of 15%. | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Indicates incumbent not running again. To clarify further; this is a list of federal election winners with their party in parentheses, and their margin |
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Indicates incumbent not running again. To clarify further; this is a list of federal election winners with their party in parentheses, and their margin as a percentage of the vote over the party whose list the seat is on (not the same as the margin of victory if the party potentially "targeting" the seat in that list did not finish second in the previous election). "Won" means that the targeting party won the seat from the incumbent party. "Held" means the incumbent party held the seat. | ||
<!--This list is complete.--> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! style="background |
! style="background:#6495ed;"| ] | ||
! style="background |
! style="background:#f08080;"| ] | ||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
| | | | ||
#], SK (Lib) 0.3% | #], SK (Lib) 0.3%* (won)† | ||
#], ON (Lib) 0.9% | #], ON (Lib) 0.9% (won) | ||
#], NS (Lib) 1.1% | #], NS (Lib) 1.1% (won) | ||
#], BC (NDP) 1.1% | #], BC (NDP) 1.1% (won) | ||
#], ON (Lib) 1.3% | #], ON (Lib) 1.3% (won) | ||
#], BC (Lib) 1.5% | #], BC (Lib) 1.5% (won)‡ | ||
#], ON (Lib) |
#], ON (Lib) 1.8%* (won) | ||
#], |
#], ON (Lib) 2.2% (won) | ||
#], |
#], NB (Lib) 2.4% (held) | ||
#], |
#], BC (Lib) 3.6% (held) | ||
#], |
#], MB (Lib) 3.6% (won) | ||
#], |
#], NB (Lib) 3.6% (won) | ||
#], |
#], ON (Lib) 4.1% (held) | ||
#], BC (Lib) 4.1% (won) | |||
#], NL (Lib) 4.7% | |||
#], |
#], NL (Lib) 4.7% (held) | ||
| | | | ||
#], ON (Con) <0.1% | #], ON (Con) <0.1% (held) | ||
#], MB (Con) 0.3% | #], MB (Con) 0.3% (held) | ||
#], ON (Con) 0.4% | #], ON (Con) 0.4% (held) | ||
#], NB (Con) 0.9% | #], NB (Con) 0.9% (held) | ||
#], ON (Con) 1.1% | #], ON (Con) 1.1% (held) | ||
#], QC (BQ) 1.7% | #], QC (BQ) 1.7% (held) | ||
#], BC (Con) 1.9% | #], BC (Con) 1.9% (held) | ||
#], ON (NDP) 1.9% | #], ON (NDP) 1.9% (held) | ||
#], ON (Con) 2.0% | #], ON (Con) 2.0% (held) | ||
#], ON (Con) 2.0% | #], ON (Con) 2.0% (held) | ||
#], QC (BQ) 2.2% | #], QC (BQ) 2.2% (won) | ||
#], QC (BQ) 2.2% | #], QC (BQ) 2.2% (won) | ||
#], BC (NDP) 2.6% | #], BC (NDP) 2.6% (held) | ||
#], ON (Con) 2.7% | #], ON (Con) 2.7% (held) | ||
#], ON (Con) 2.7% | #], ON (Con) 2.7% (held) | ||
|- | |- | ||
! style="background |
! style="background:#87cefa;"| ] | ||
! style="background |
! style="background:#f4a460;"| ] | ||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
| | | | ||
#], QC (Con) 0.4% | #], QC (Con) 0.4% (won) | ||
#], QC (Con) 1.6% | #], QC (Con) 1.6% (held) | ||
#], QC (Con) 2.7% | #], QC (Con) 2.7% (held) | ||
#], QC (Lib) 3.3% | #], QC (Lib) 3.3% (held) | ||
#], QC (Lib) 3.8% | #], QC (Lib) 3.8% (held) | ||
#], QC (Con) 5.0% | #], QC (Con) 5.0% (held) | ||
#], QC (Lib) 6.1% | #], QC (Lib) 6.1% (held) | ||
#], QC (Lib) 6.3% | #], QC (Lib) 6.3%¹ (held by NDP) | ||
#], QC (Lib) 11.4% | #], QC (Lib) 11.4% (held) | ||
#], QC (Con) 12.8% | #], QC (Con) 12.8% (held) | ||
#], QC (Ind) 13.9% | #], QC (Ind) 13.9% (held) | ||
| | | | ||
#], ON (Lib) 1.0% | #], ON (Lib) 1.0%* (won) | ||
#], BC (Lib) 1.6% | #], BC (Lib) 1.6% (held) | ||
#], ON (Lib) 1.7% | #], ON (Lib) 1.7% (won) | ||
#], ON (Lib) 3.7% | #], ON (Lib) 3.7% (won) | ||
#], ON (Lib) 4.6% | #], ON (Lib) 4.6%* * (won) | ||
#], BC (Lib) 4.6% | #], BC (Lib) 4.6% (held) | ||
#], ON (Lib) 4.8% | #], ON (Lib) 4.8% (won) | ||
#], ON (Con) 5.2% | #], ON (Con) 5.2% (held) | ||
#], BC (Con) 5.2% | #], BC (Con) 5.2% (held) | ||
#], ON (Lib) 5.4% | #], ON (Lib) 5.4% (held) | ||
#], ON (Lib) 5.7% | #], ON (Lib) 5.7% (won by Conservatives) | ||
#], SK (Con) 6.5% | #], SK (Con) 6.5%* (held) | ||
#], NS (Con) 7.8% | #], NS (Con) 7.8% (held) | ||
#], NS (Con) 8.3% | #], NS (Con) 8.3% (held) | ||
#], BC (Con) 8.3% | #], BC (Con) 8.3% (held) | ||
|- | |||
| colspan=2| | |||
† Won by the Conservatives<ref>]</ref> in an intervening by-election with more than a 15% margin over the Liberals.<br /> | |||
‡ The incumbent had become an independent and was sitting as a Green at the time of dissolution.<br /> | |||
¹ Won by the NDP in an intervening ] with more than a 19% margin over the Liberals. | |||
|} | |} | ||
]s for all the major candidates decorate an intersection during the London North Centre by-election]] | |||
*The ] did not come within 15% of winning any riding in the 2006 election, but came 9.0% short of winning ], ON (Lib) in a November 2006 by-election. | |||
===Cabinet ministers |
===Targeted Cabinet ministers=== | ||
The following Cabinet ministers were elected by a margin of less than 10% in 2006: | |||
#], Health and Federal Economic Initiaitve for Northern Ontario: 0.1% over Lib in ], ON | |||
#], |
#], Health and Federal Economic Initiative for Northern Ontario: 0.1% over Lib in ], ON | ||
#], Transport, Infrastructure and Communities: 5.0% over BQ in ], QC | |||
#], Finance: 5.7% over Lib in ], ON | #], Finance: 5.7% over Lib in ], ON | ||
#], |
#], Justice: 5.9% over Lib in ], ON | ||
#], |
#], Defence and Atlantic Opportunities: 7.8% over NDP in ], NS | ||
#], |
#], Environment: 9.0% over Lib in ], ON | ||
#], Treasury Board: 9.0% over Lib in ], ON | |||
==Potential fall of government== | |||
==Opinion Polls== | |||
{{main|2008–2009 Canadian parliamentary dispute}} | |||
Since the 2006 election, polls have generally indicated a slight decline in the Liberal and Bloc votes and a slight increase in the Conservative and NDP votes. However, this might be attributed to the current leaderless state of the Liberal Party before ] and the slight boost in popularity generally experienced by any new government. | |||
] | |||
On December 1, 2008, as the result of opposition dissatisfaction with the government's economic update (which failed to include stimulus measures to help the Canadian economy contend with the ] and included a 'poison pill' regarding the cessation of public party financing), the leaders of the Liberal Party, New Democratic Party, and Bloc Québécois announced they had reached an agreement to approach the ] for the purpose of forming a ]. Combined, the three opposition parties constitute a majority of seats in the House of Commons. Parliament was due to vote on a ] on December 8; if successful, the Liberals and NDP would have formally asked the Governor General to form a coalition minority government for 30 months, while the BQ pledged to support for at least 18 months. Liberal leader Stéphane Dion would have become prime minister until the selection of his successor at the Liberal leadership convention in May 2009, and a coalition ] would have comprised 18 Liberal (including a finance minister) and 6 NDP ministers. Governor General ] had cut short a ] to ] "in light of the current political situation in Canada".<ref name="deal_news"/> | |||
On December 4, 2008, Jean granted Harper's request to ] Parliament until January 26, 2009, thereby staving off the prospect of an imminent change in government.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/gg-agrees-to-suspend-parliament-until-january-1.705593|title=GG agrees to suspend Parliament: Harper |publisher=]|access-date=December 4, 2008|date=December 4, 2008}}</ref> Dion stood down as Liberal leader on December 10 and was replaced by interim leader ], who would later be ] as permanent leader.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/dion-will-bow-out-early-to-clear-way-for-successor-1.713813|title=Dion will bow out early to clear way for successor|publisher=CBC News|date=8 December 2008|access-date=2 April 2014|archive-date=31 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170331115430/http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/dion-will-bow-out-early-to-clear-way-for-successor-1.713813|url-status=live}}</ref> Ignatieff soon ended the coalition agreement with the other two parties, motivated largely in part by Harper's publicly indicating that he would advise Jean to hold a new election (which, under the precedent set by the ], she would have been obligated to do) rather than recommending that Ignatieff be allowed to form a minority government should the government lose a confidence vote,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/01/26/8145701-sun.html|title=Clock ticking on coalition's chances|last=Harris|first=Kathleen|date=26 January 2009|newspaper=Toronto Sun|access-date=23 April 2010}}</ref> and polling indicating that any such election would almost certainly result in the Conservatives winning a strong majority.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCATRE4B42X520081205/| title=Harper Has Crushing Poll Lead On Crisis| access-date=2008-12-05| last=]|date=December 2008| work=Reuters| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081208015902/http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCATRE4B42X520081205/| archive-date=8 December 2008 | url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
==Opinion polls== | |||
<!--PLEASE READ ] if you are confused about which date to use for opinion polls. It should always be the date the poll was conducted, not the release date. This is explained on the talk page.--> | |||
{{main|Opinion polling for the 2008 Canadian federal election}} | |||
{{Canadian federal election opinion polling|2004|2006|2008|2011|2015|byCon4=yes|byCon5=yes}} | |||
] | |||
The dates listed are normally the date the survey was concluded. Most news and political affairs sources use the convention of using the last date that the poll was conducted in order to establish the inclusion/exclusion of current events. | |||
==Endorsements== | |||
{|class="wikitable" | |||
{{further|Newspaper endorsements in the Canadian federal election, 2008}} | |||
|- style="background-color:#E9E9E9" | |||
!width=20%|Polling Firm | |||
==Candidates by party== | |||
!width=15%|Last Date of Polling | |||
*] | |||
!width=7%|Link | |||
*] | |||
|{{Canadian politics/party colours/Conservative}} align="center"| | |||
]<br> |
*] | ||
*] | |||
|{{Canadian politics/party colours/Liberal}} align="center"|]<br> ''']''' | |||
*] | |||
|{{Canadian politics/party colours/NDP}} align="center"|]<br> ''']''' | |||
*] | |||
|{{Canadian politics/party colours/BQ}} align="center"|]<br> ''']''' | |||
|{{Canadian politics/party colours/Green}} align="center"|]<br> ''']''' | |||
==Results== | |||
{{Main|Results of the 2008 Canadian federal election|Results of the 2008 Canadian federal election by riding}} | |||
] | |||
{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:right; font-size:85%" | |||
|+Elections to the ] (2008)<ref name="Report2009">{{cite book |author=<!--Not stated--> |date= 2009|title= Report of the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada on the 40th general election of October 14, 2008|url= https://www.elections.ca/res/rep/off/sta_2008/stat_report_e.pdf|location= Ottawa|publisher= ]|issn= 0846-6351|isbn=978-0-662-06476-3}}</ref><ref name="Districts2008">{{cite web |url= https://www.elections.ca/scripts/OVR2008/31/data/table_tableau11.csv|title= Table 11: Voting results by electoral district|author=<!--Not stated--> |publisher= ]|access-date= April 21, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Candidates2008">{{cite web |url= https://www.elections.ca/scripts/OVR2008/31/data/table_tableau12.csv|title= Table 12: List of candidates by electoral district and individual results|author=<!--Not stated--> |publisher= ]|access-date= April 21, 2024}}</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="width:15%"|Party | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
! rowspan="2"|Leader | |||
! rowspan="2"|Candidates | |||
||32||30||15||11||10 | |||
! colspan="6"|Votes | |||
! colspan="5"|Seats | |||
|- | |- | ||
! # | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
! ± | |||
||32||32||17||11||9 | |||
! % | |||
! colspan="3" | Change (pp) | |||
! ] | |||
! 2008 | |||
! ± | |||
! G | |||
! L | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 307{{efn|The Conservatives chose not to field a candidate in ], as the incumbent Independent MP ] consistently sided with them in votes in the House.}} || 5,209,069 || 165,002{{decrease}} || 37.65 | |||
| {{bartable| 1.38||-5|1em|background:green}} | |||
|124 | |||
|{{Composition bar|143|308|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}}}} | |||
|19{{increase}} | |||
|25 | |||
|6 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 307{{efn|The Liberals opted not to field a candidate in ], so as not to oppose ] in her campaign for a Green seat.}}{{efn|Lesley Hughes of ] was nominated as a Liberal, but lost party support after the nomination deadline and continued to run as an independent; she was listed as a Liberal on the ballot.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/506806 | title=Dion drops candidate over 9/11 remarks | newspaper=The Toronto Star | date=September 26, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Both Conservatives, NDP gain in Manitoba |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/both-conservatives-ndp-gain-in-manitoba-1.764907 |access-date=March 15, 2020 |work=CBC News |date=October 15, 2008}}</ref>}} || 3,633,185 || 846,230{{decrease}} || 26.26 | |||
| {{bartable| -3.97||-5|1em|background:red}} | |||
|103 | |||
|{{Composition bar|77|308|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}} | |||
|26{{decrease}} | |||
|5 | |||
|31 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 308{{efn|Includes Julian West (]) and Andrew McKeever (]), who withdrew their candidacies but still appeared on the ballot.}} || 2,515,288 || 74,309{{decrease}} || 18.18 | |||
| {{bartable| 0.70||-5|1em|background:green}} | |||
|29 | |||
|{{Composition bar|37|308|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}}}} | |||
|8{{increase}} | |||
|11 | |||
|3 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 75 || 1,379,991 || 173,210{{decrease}} || 9.98 | |||
| {{bartable| -0.51||-5|1em|background:red}} | |||
|51 | |||
|{{Composition bar|49|308|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}}}} | |||
|2{{decrease}} | |||
|1 | |||
|3 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 303 || 937,613 || 273,545{{increase}} || 6.78 | |||
| {{bartable| 2.30||-5|1em|background:green}} | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|row-name}} | |||
| || 71 || 94,844 || 12,984{{increase}} || 0.69 | |||
| {{bartable| 0.13||-5|1em|background:green}} | |||
|1 | |||
|{{Composition bar|2|308|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent}}}} | |||
|1{{increase}} | |||
|1 | |||
| – | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Christian Heritage|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |Ron Gray | |||
| 59 || 26,475 || 1,677{{decrease}} || 0.19 || – | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Marxist-Leninist|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |Anna Di Carlo | |||
| 59 || 8,565 || 415{{decrease}} || 0.06 || – | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Libertarian|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |Dennis Young | |||
| 26 || 7,300 || 4,298{{increase}} || 0.05 || 0.03 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Progressive Canadian|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 10 || 5,860 || 8,291{{decrease}} || 0.04 || -0.05 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Communist|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 24 || 3,572 || 550{{increase}} || 0.03 || 0.01 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Canadian Action|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |Connie Fogal | |||
| 20 || 3,455 || 2,647{{decrease}} || 0.02 || -0.02 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Marijuana|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 8 || 2,298 || 6,873{{decrease}} || 0.02 || -0.05 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|neorhino.ca|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 7 || 2,122 || 2,122{{increase}} || 0.02 ||''New'' | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|NLFirst|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 3 || 1,713 || 1,713{{increase}} || 0.01 ||''New'' | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|FPNP|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |Barbara Wardlaw | |||
| 6 || 1,611 || 410 {{increase}} || 0.01 || – | |||
{{Canadian party colour/Temporary|CA|AAEVPC|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 4 || 527 || 455{{increase}} || – || – | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|WLP|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 1 || 425 || 425{{increase}} || – ||''New'' | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Western Canada Concept|row}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
| 1 || 195 || 899{{decrease}} || – || -0.01 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|People's Political Power|row-name}} | |||
| style="text-align:left;" |Roger Poisson | |||
| 2 || 186 || 186{{increase}} || – ||''New'' | |||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="3" style="text-align: left;" |'''Total''' ||1,601 | |||
|]/]||], ]|| | |||
! colspan="2"|13,834,294 | |||
! colspan="2"| 100.00% | |||
||36||31.7||16.2||9.9||6.2 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="4" style="text-align:left;" | Rejected ballots | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
| 94,799 ||3,255{{increase}} | |||
||37||28||18||9||7 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="4" style="text-align:left;" | Turnout | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
|13,929,093 ||979,610{{decrease}} | |||
|58.83% ||5.84{{decrease}} | |||
||35||26||19||12||8 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="4" style="text-align:left;" | Registered voters | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
|23,677,639 ||623,024{{increase}} | |||
|} | |||
||38.7||28.8||17.0||8.4||7.0 | |||
===Synopsis of results=== | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" style="text-align:right; font-size:85%" | |||
|+ Results by riding — 2008 Canadian federal election<ref name="Report2009"/><ref name="Districts2008"/><ref name="Candidates2008"/> | |||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" rowspan="3" scope="col" | ] | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
! colspan="2" rowspan="3" scope="col" | ] | |||
||34||30||14||11||10 | |||
! scope="col" colspan="6" | Winning party | |||
! rowspan="3" scope="col" | Turnout<br><ref group=a>including spoilt ballots</ref> | |||
! scope="col" colspan="8" | Votes<ref group=a>minor political parties receiving less than 1% of the national popular vote are aggregated under "Other"; independent candidates are aggregated separately</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" rowspan="2" scope="col" | Party | |||
|Decima Research||], ]|| | |||
! rowspan="2" scope="col" | Votes | |||
! rowspan="2" scope="col" | Share | |||
||33||28||19||10||8 | |||
! rowspan="2" scope="col" | Margin<br># | |||
! rowspan="2" scope="col" | Margin<br>% | |||
! scope="col" | ] | |||
! scope="col" | ] | |||
! scope="col" | ] | |||
! scope="col" | ] | |||
! scope="col" | ] | |||
! scope="col" | {{abbr|Ind|Independent or No Affiliation}} | |||
! scope="col" | Other | |||
! rowspan="2" scope="col" | Total | |||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="col" style="background-color:#6495ED;"| | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
! scope="col" style="background-color:#EA6D6A;"| | |||
||38||29||17||10||5 | |||
! scope="col" style="background-color:#F4A460;"| | |||
! scope="col" style="background-color:#87CEFA;"| | |||
! scope="col" style="background-color:#99C955;"| | |||
! scope="col" style="background-color:#DCDCDC;"| | |||
! scope="col" style="background-color:#FFFFFF;"| | |||
|- | |- | ||
! !! !! colspan="2"| !! colspan="2"| !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
||36||30||18||11||5 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
||36||29||15||10||7 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,085 || 55.60% || 17,683 || 37.69% || 53.16% || 26,085 || 8,402 || 4,229 || – || 7,778 || 420 || – || 46,914 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Decima Research||], ]|| | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
||32||31||16||11||8 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 27,361 || 56.54% || 19,948 || 41.22% || 56.29% || 27,361 || 5,699 || 7,413 || – || 7,392 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|529 || 48,394 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|]||], ]|| | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
||38||29||15||11||8 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 21,311 || 66.47% || 17,543 || 54.72% || 41.79% || 21,311 || 3,255 || 3,768 || – || 3,403 || – || 323 || 32,060 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 18,917 || 51.52% || 11,484 || 31.27% || 44.39% || 18,917 || 7,433 || 3,279 || – || 2,045 || 4,836 || 211 || 36,721 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|]||]]||||39||27||17||10||7 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 35,029 || 69.62% || 28,372 || 56.39% || 53.86% || 35,029 || 6,657 || 3,941 || – || 4,685 || – || – || 50,312 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Decima Research<br> <small><div style="height: 40px; background:white; text-align: right;">Without Greens Surveyed<br> With Greens Surveyed</small></div>||]]<div style="height: 40px; background:white; text-align: right;"><small>]]<BR>]]</small></div>||<br><div style="height: 40px; background:white; text-align: center;"></div>||36<br>''<small> <div style="height: 40px; background:white; text-align: right;"> 36 <br> 36 </div></small>''||30<br>''<small> <div style="height: 40px; background:white; text-align: right;"> 30 <br> 29 </div></small>''||17<br>''<small> <div style="height: 40px; background:white; text-align: right;"> 19 <br> 16 </div></small>''||-<br>''<small> <div style="height: 40px; background:white; text-align: right;"> 11 <br> 10 </div></small>''||- <br>''<small> <div style="height: 40px; background:white; text-align: right;"> - <br> 8 </div></small>'' | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 41,425 || 73.89% || 35,689 || 63.66% || 57.15% || 41,425 || 4,878 || 4,024 || – || 5,736 || – || – || 56,063 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Strategic Counsel||]]||||37||26||18||11||8 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 38,548 || 72.96% || 33,630 || 63.65% || 58.39% || 38,548 || 4,918 || 4,102 || – || 4,743 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|521 || 52,832 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|]||]]||||39||25||21||9||4 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 34,579 || 57.36% || 21,375 || 35.46% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.96% || 34,579 || 13,204 || 3,832 || – || 6,722 || 1,790 || 155 || 60,282 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Decima Research||]]|| | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
||38||28||19||10||- | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 39,342 || 82.03% || 35,559 || 74.15% || 54.86% || 39,342 || 1,958 || 3,783 || – || 2,875 || – || – || 47,958 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Strategic Counsel||]]||||36||27||19||9||9 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 22,634 || 49.04% || 9,973 || 21.61% || 51.57% || 22,634 || 12,661 || 6,912 || – || 3,746 || – || 203 || 46,156 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Decima Research||]]||||38||29||21||8||- | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 21,487 || 51.32% || 8,169 || 19.51% || 45.43% || 21,487 || 4,578 || 13,318 || – || 2,488 || – || – || 41,871 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Ipsos-Reid||]]||||43||25||15||9||5 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 33,174 || 63.21% || 23,940 || 45.61% || 56.64% || 33,174 || 9,234 || 5,994 || – || 4,081 || – || – || 52,483 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|SES Research||]] ||||38||28||19||9||6 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 25,130 || 60.32% || 17,421 || 41.82% || 52.09% || 25,130 || 7,709 || 6,297 || – || 2,366 || – || 157 || 41,659 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 31,436 || 61.65% || 23,391 || 45.87% || 53.67% || 31,436 || 7,441 || 8,045 || – || 4,072 || – || – || 50,994 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 17,628 || 35.84% || 1,668 || 3.39% || 55.09% || 17,628 || 5,575 || 6,339 || – || 3,678 || 15,960 || – || 49,180 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Strategic Counsel||]]||||35||31||16||10|||9 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 36,402 || 68.55% || 29,775 || 56.07% || 53.52% || 36,402 || 6,099 || 6,627 || – || 3,975 || – || – || 53,103 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Decima Research||]]||||41||26||19||10||- | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 20,103 || 42.58% || 463 || 0.98% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.86% || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|19,640 || 4,279 || 20,103 || – || 3,040 || – || 147 || 47,209 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Strategic Counsel||]]||||39||29||14||11||5 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 17,160 || 67.12% || 13,860 || 54.21% || 35.82% || 17,160 || 2,710 || 3,300 || – || 1,628 || 350 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|419 || 25,567 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Environics||]]||||41||22||21||10||5 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 31,714 || 66.96% || 24,981 || 52.74% || 53.29% || 31,714 || 4,404 || 6,733 || – || 3,420 || – || 1,094 || 47,365 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Decima Research||]]||||39||28||19||11||- | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 35,328 || 77.36% || 31,167 || 68.25% || 56.39% || 35,328 || 2,703 || 3,053 || – || 4,161 || – || 422 || 45,667 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,950 || 70.87% || 22,763 || 59.86% || 46.20% || 26,950 || 2,639 || 4,187 || – || 2,338 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|1,551 || 363 || 38,028 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Ipsos-Reid||]]||||38||28||19||9||5 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 29,550 || 69.51% || 23,426 || 55.11% || 44.24% || 29,550 || 2,843 || 6,124 || – || 3,303 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|689 || 42,509 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 33,226 || 73.24% || 28,186 || 62.13% || 49.87% || 33,226 || 2,863 || 5,040 || – || 4,239 || – || – || 45,368 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Decima Research||]]||||37||28||19||10||- | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 34,493 || 77.09% || 30,263 || 67.64% || 54.03% || 34,493 || 2,345 || 4,230 || – || 3,676 || – || – || 44,744 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Decima Research||]]||||35||28||21||10||- | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 27,338 || 72.71% || 23,529 || 62.58% || 51.13% || 27,338 || 3,418 || 3,809 || – || 2,522 || – || 510 || 37,597 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Ipsos-Reid||]]||||39||27||20||8||5 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 32,528 || 77.14% || 28,892 || 68.51% || 52.94% || 32,528 || 2,362 || 3,636 || – || 3,395 || – || 249 || 42,170 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 36,869 || 72.92% || 30,479 || 60.28% || 56.18% || 36,869 || 2,890 || 4,169 || – || 6,390 || – || 246 || 50,564 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | AB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Strategic Counsel||]]||||39||28||19||8||- | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,863 || 71.85% || 22,276 || 59.58% || 49.97% || 26,863 || 1,489 || 4,587 || – || 3,437 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|1,014 || 37,390 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|Decima Research||]]||||35||25||24||8||- | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 30,853 || 63.32% || 22,920 || 47.04% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.50% || 30,853 || 7,933 || 6,444 || – || 3,141 || – || 358 || 48,729 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|SES Research||]]||||33||34||18||9||7 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 22,693 || 47.51% || 5,571 || 11.66% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.89% || 17,122 || 3,292 || 22,693 || – || 4,573 || – || 80 || 47,760 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
||||||||||||||| | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 17,937 || 37.94% || 798 || 1.69% || 57.70% || 17,139 || 9,177 || 17,937 || – || 2,822 || – || 203 || 47,278 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|]||]]||||36.3 ||30.2||17.5||10.5||4.5 | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 20,145 || 46.50% || 6,995 || 16.15% || 54.35% || 13,150 || 6,681 || 20,145 || – || 3,067 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|282 || 43,325 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 22,637 || 55.39% || 12,056 || 29.50% || 54.32% || 22,637 || 4,309 || 10,581 || – || 2,614 || 729 || – || 40,870 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 29,198 || 62.32% || 20,407 || 43.56% || 57.52% || 29,198 || 3,990 || 8,791 || – || 4,107 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|766 || 46,852 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,252 || 55.75% || 15,881 || 33.73% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.06% || 26,252 || 10,371 || 6,803 || – || 3,663 || – || – || 47,089 | |||
|- style="background-color:#AFEEEE;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ]<ref group=a>recount terminated at request of applicant</ref> | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 20,042 || 34.18% || 68 || 0.12% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.57% || 19,974 || 20,042 || 13,322 || – || 4,854 || 309 || 130 || 58,631 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 21,389 || 44.70% || 8,887 || 18.57% || 55.57% || 21,389 || 12,502 || 10,916 || – || 3,045 || – || – || 47,852 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 25,209 || 46.16% || 5,608 || 10.27% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.02% || 25,209 || 5,375 || 19,601 || – || 4,430 || – || – || 54,615 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 31,907 || 55.94% || 23,283 || 40.82% || 58.76% || 31,907 || 8,469 || 8,624 || – || 7,821 || – || 218 || 57,039 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,402 || 59.59% || 14,510 || 36.95% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.76% || 23,402 || 3,044 || 8,892 || – || 3,933 || – || – || 39,271 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 32,594 || 61.46% || 23,696 || 44.68% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.94% || 32,594 || 5,888 || 8,898 || – || 5,059 || – || 594 || 53,033 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 28,930 || 46.68% || 9,250 || 14.93% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.77% || 28,930 || 5,578 || 19,680 || – || 7,457 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|331 || 61,976 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 27,454 || 45.17% || 4,610 || 7.58% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.45% || 22,844 || 4,483 || 27,454 || – || 5,816 || – || 182 || 60,779 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 20,787 || 41.83% || 1,488 || 2.99% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.74% || 19,299 || 5,615 || 20,787 || – || 3,574 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|417 || 49,692 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 16,481 || 36.42% || 2,493 || 5.51% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.07% || 13,988 || 16,481 || 11,824 || – || 2,533 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|305 || 121 || 45,252 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 24,371 || 42.26% || 2,820 || 4.89% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.45% || 24,371 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|21,551 || 5,417 || – || 6,168 || – || 166 || 57,673 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 28,765 || 58.13% || 20,529 || 41.48% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.63% || 28,765 || 5,883 || 8,236 || – || 6,603 || – || – || 49,487 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 28,002 || 51.72% || 17,338 || 32.02% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.71% || 28,002 || 5,414 || 10,664 || – || 9,368 || 416 || 278 || 54,142 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,512 || 51.81% || 9,618 || 18.80% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.24% || 26,512 || 3,394 || 16,894 || – || 3,833 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|238 || 300 || 51,171 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 25,535 || 54.61% || 15,117 || 32.33% || 58.83% || 25,535 || 6,918 || 10,418 || – || 3,568 || – || 321 || 46,760 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 22,325 || 63.59% || 16,155 || 46.02% || 48.89% || 22,325 || 2,954 || 6,170 || – || 3,656 || – || – || 35,105 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 21,359 || 49.81% || 8,138 || 18.98% || 51.99% || 21,359 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|13,221 || 5,059 || – || 2,753 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|486 || – || 42,878 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 27,991 || 43.42% || 2,625 || 4.07% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|70.40% || 27,991 || 25,366 || 3,667 || – || 6,742 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|694 || 64,460 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 17,219 || 49.84% || 4,658 || 13.48% || 56.51% || 12,561 || 1,916 || 17,219 || – || 1,613 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|1,237 || 34,546 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 31,216 || 56.65% || 19,701 || 35.75% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.08% || 31,216 || 11,515 || 7,146 || – || 4,951 || – || 273 || 55,101 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 13,714 || 39.37% || 1,106 || 3.18% || 51.56% || 13,714 || 5,227 || 12,608 || – || 1,925 || 271 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|1,088 || 34,833 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 19,506 || 34.51% || 5,318 || 9.41% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.37% || 14,188 || 19,506 || 12,047 || – || 10,354 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|434 || 56,529 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 22,506 || 54.40% || 15,379 || 37.18% || 53.51% || 6,432 || 7,127 || 22,506 || – || 4,708 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|596 || 41,369 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 25,963 || 45.78% || 2,497 || 4.40% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.58% || 25,963 || 2,380 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|23,466 || – || 4,544 || 362 || – || 56,715 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 15,933 || 35.18% || 2,769 || 6.11% || 56.45% || 12,419 || 13,164 || 15,933 || – || 3,031 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|749 || 45,296 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 25,393 || 45.59% || 4,832 || 8.68% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.37% || 20,561 || 25,393 || 4,493 || – || 4,916 || – || 333 || 55,696 | |||
|- style="background-color:#AFEEEE;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 16,110 || 38.49% || 20 || 0.05% || 52.42% || 16,090 || 16,110<ref group=a>] was previously an NDP member of the ], and was ] until 2001.</ref> || 7,376 || – || 2,065 || – || 211 || 41,852 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 26,443 || 44.61% || 10,106 || 17.05% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|67.48% || 16,337 || 10,006 || 26,443 || – || 6,252 || – || 237 || 59,275 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | BC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,949 || 44.57% || 10,880 || 17.99% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.36% || 26,949 || 16,069 || 8,728 || – || style="background-color:#EABB94;"|8,723 || – || – || 60,469 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 19,558 || 57.06% || 13,503 || 39.40% || 55.96% || 19,558 || 2,836 || 6,055 || – || 5,410 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|416 || 34,275 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 21,588 || 53.83% || 13,074 || 32.60% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.36% || 21,588 || 8,514 || 7,190 || – || 2,632 || – || 180 || 40,104 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 8,734 || 47.46% || 3,445 || 18.72% || 40.15% || 3,773 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|5,289 || 8,734 || – || 606 || – || – || 18,402 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 18,132 || 61.36% || 13,218 || 44.73% || 54.71% || 18,132 || 4,128 || 4,914 || – || 1,923 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|452 || 29,549 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 14,355 || 45.77% || 1,579 || 5.03% || 54.04% || 12,776 || 2,079 || 14,355 || – || 1,839 || – || 312 || 31,361 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 19,751 || 53.40% || 7,658 || 20.71% || 58.48% || 19,751 || 3,009 || 12,093 || – || 1,685 || 214 || 233 || 36,985 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 22,036 || 68.27% || 17,662 || 54.71% || 53.77% || 22,036 || 4,374 || 2,353 || – || 2,606 || – || 911 || 32,280 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,303 || 64.66% || 18,356 || 50.93% || 58.01% || 23,303 || 4,531 || 4,947 || – || 2,089 || – || 1,170 || 36,040 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 19,440 || 46.32% || 4,712 || 11.23% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.32% || 19,440 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|14,728 || 5,502 || – || 2,104 || – || 195 || 41,969 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,302 || 60.63% || 13,796 || 35.90% || 57.68% || 23,302 || 3,203 || 9,506 || – || 2,126 || – || 295 || 38,432 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 12,285 || 48.92% || 6,848 || 27.27% || 43.25% || 5,437 || 3,922 || 12,285 || – || 2,777 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|361 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|331 || 25,113 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 14,097 || 62.61% || 9,064 || 40.26% || 42.85% || 5,033 || 2,075 || 14,097 || – || 1,070 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|241 || 22,516 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 19,954 || 48.84% || 5,733 || 14.03% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.63% || 19,954 || 14,221<ref group=a>] was previously a member of the ]</ref> || 4,673 || – || 1,839 || – || 173 || 40,860 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | MB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 16,438 || 42.27% || 2,335 || 6.00% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.68% || 14,103 || 16,438 || 5,490 || – || 2,860 || – || – || 38,891 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 25,849 || 57.53% || 15,999 || 35.61% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|68.32% || 8,331 || 9,850 || 25,849 || – || 904 || – || – || 44,934 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 20,059 || 46.76% || 7,553 || 17.61% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|69.25% || 12,506 || 20,059 || 7,242 || – || 3,087 || – || – || 42,894 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 17,962 || 42.53% || 4,643 || 10.99% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.13% || 17,962 || 13,319 || 6,490 || – || 4,293 || – || 168 || 42,232 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 17,211 || 51.63% || 9,304 || 27.91% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.09% || 17,211 || 5,773 || 7,907 || – || 2,443 || – || – || 33,334 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 16,266 || 47.40% || 4,864 || 14.17% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.77% || 11,402 || 16,266 || 5,361 || – || 1,287 || – || – || 34,316 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 12,058 || 42.08% || 1,468 || 5.12% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.78% || 12,058 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|10,590 || 4,904 || – || 1,105 || – || – || 28,657 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 17,797 || 39.13% || 1,500 || 3.30% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.31% || 16,297 || 17,797 || 7,394 || – || 3,998 || – || – || 45,486 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 17,474 || 58.32% || 11,611 || 38.75% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.17% || 17,474 || 5,863 || 4,958 || – || 1,667 || – || – || 29,962 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 13,782 || 39.55% || 497 || 1.43% || 54.01% || 13,782<ref group=a>] was previously a member of the ]</ref> || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|13,285 || 5,560 || – || 1,888 || – || 330 || 34,845 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NB || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 18,071 || 57.40% || 11,298 || 35.88% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.73% || 18,071 || 6,773 || 4,830 || – || 1,810 || – || – || 31,484 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NL || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 14,866 || 45.28% || 3,324 || 10.13% || 51.80% || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|11,542 || 14,866 || 5,707 || – || 714 || – || – || 32,829 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NL || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 20,089 || 70.27% || 15,735 || 55.04% || 41.15% || 4,354 || 20,089 || 3,577 || – || 568 || – || – || 28,588 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NL || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 17,956 || 68.22% || 13,353 || 50.73% || 44.25% || 2,799 || 17,956 || 4,603 || – || – || – || 964 || 26,322 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NL || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 5,426 || 70.28% || 4,048 || 52.43% || 38.60% || 615 || 5,426 || 1,378 || – || 302 || – || – || 7,721 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NL || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 12,557 || 53.72% || 6,994 || 29.92% || 41.07% || 4,791 || 12,557 || 5,563 || – || 462 || – || – || 23,373 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NL || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 30,881 || 74.55% || 25,670 || 61.97% || 56.89% || 3,836 || 5,211 || 30,881 || – || 570 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|925 || 41,423 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NL || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 14,920 || 43.32% || 949 || 2.76% || 51.95% || 4,324 || 14,920 || 13,971 || – || 643 || 179 || 402 || 34,439 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 17,447 || 48.10% || 8,923 || 24.60% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.31% || 8,524 || 17,447 || 7,660 || – || 2,641 || – || – || 36,272 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 18,240 || 46.60% || 5,620 || 14.36% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|67.01% || 18,240 || – || 7,659 || – || 12,620 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|623 || 39,142 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#DCDCDC;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Ind | |||
| 27,303 || 69.01% || 22,429 || 56.69% || 57.77% || 3,493 || 3,344 || 4,874 || – || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|27,853<ref group=a>], the winning candidate, was previously the Conservative MP</ref> || – || 39,564 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 16,016 || 39.49% || 3,223 || 7.95% || 58.73% || 9,109 || 16,016 || 12,793 || – || 2,417 || – || 219 || 40,554 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 19,252 || 42.69% || 6,794 || 15.06% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.67% || 9,295 || 12,458 || 19,252 || – || 3,931 || – || 162 || 45,098 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 17,129 || 41.56% || 4,928 || 11.96% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.13% || 8,708 || 17,129 || 12,201 || – || 2,920 || – || 257 || 41,215 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 16,641 || 44.19% || 6,795 || 18.04% || 58.59% || 9,846 || 16,641 || 8,291 || – || 2,353 || – || 528 || 37,659 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 24,279 || 61.42% || 16,081 || 40.68% || 58.52% || 8,198 || 5,018 || 24,279 || – || 2,034 || – || – || 39,529 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 14,388 || 35.99% || 932 || 2.33% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.20% || 14,388 || 9,536 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|13,456 || – || 2,090 || – || 513 || 39,983 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 17,303 || 49.40% || 8,744 || 24.96% || 57.41% || 7,223 || 17,303 || 8,559 || – || 1,941 || – || – || 35,026 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | NS || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 16,779 || 39.94% || 1,594 || 3.79% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.48% || 16,779<ref group=a>] was previously a member of the ]</ref> || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|15,185 || 7,097 || – || 2,106 || 844 || – || 42,011 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,675 || 44.53% || 3,204 || 6.58% || 56.71% || 18,471 || 21,675 || 4,422 || – || 3,543 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|565 || 48,676 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 15,249 || 45.50% || 4,347 || 12.97% || 56.53% || 5,914 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|10,902 || 15,249 || – || 1,451 || – || – || 33,516 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,297 || 46.50% || 10,975 || 19.41% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.70% || 26,297 || 15,322 || 9,632 || – || 5,149 || – || 148 || 56,548 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 27,927 || 52.37% || 15,195 || 28.49% || 58.50% || 27,927 || 12,732 || 6,403 || – || 5,921 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|344 || 53,327 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 18,967 || 40.97% || 4,092 || 8.84% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.93% || 7,907 || 18,967 || 14,875 || – || 4,389 || – || 155 || 46,293 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 22,272 || 45.06% || 3,919 || 7.93% || 49.74% || 18,353 || 22,272 || 5,945 || – || 2,551 || – || 309 || 49,430 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 18,577 || 41.04% || 773 || 1.71% || 54.24% || 17,804 || 18,577 || 5,238 || – || 3,516 || – || 135 || 45,270 | |||
|- style="background-color:#AFEEEE;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ]<ref group=a>also an open seat</ref> | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,746 || 40.33% || 231 || 0.43% || 49.72% || 21,515 || 21,746 || 7,334 || – || 3,329 || – || – || 53,924 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 22,736 || 41.95% || 4,793 || 8.84% || 58.38% || 22,736 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|17,943 || 9,331 || – || 3,814 || – || 371 || 54,195 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 22,975 || 47.66% || 9,880 || 20.50% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.36% || 22,975 || 6,892 || 4,640 || – || 13,095 || – || 599 || 48,201 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 28,614 || 48.60% || 9,037 || 15.35% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.99% || 28,614 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|19,577 || 6,597 || – || 4,083 || – || – || 58,871 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 24,895 || 48.63% || 12,918 || 25.23% || 55.92% || 24,895 || 11,977 || 10,044 || – || 4,279 || – || – || 51,195 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 39,433 || 57.77% || 24,179 || 35.43% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|69.16% || 39,433 || 15,254 || 6,583 || – || 6,983 || – || – || 68,253 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 19,960 || 47.92% || 7,833 || 18.81% || 55.86% || 19,960 || 12,127 || 6,850 || – || 2,712 || – || – || 41,649 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 15,953 || 45.77% || 5,057 || 14.51% || 53.03% || 3,838 || 15,953 || 10,896 || – || 3,655 || 172 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|339 || 34,853 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 18,264 || 48.08% || 6,487 || 17.08% || 53.48% || 11,777 || 18,264 || 5,062 || – || 2,618 || – || 266 || 37,987 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 22,212 || 44.36% || 2,771 || 5.53% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.12% || 19,441 || 22,212 || 5,102 || – || 3,155 || – || 162 || 50,072 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,363 || 53.21% || 14,868 || 33.86% || 56.79% || 23,363 || 8,495 || 4,385 || – || 7,377 || – || 284 || 43,904 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 28,551 || 54.05% || 16,384 || 31.02% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.48% || 28,551 || 12,167 || 5,485 || – || 6,041 || – || 577 || 52,821 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 19,133 || 43.99% || 2,060 || 4.74% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.75% || 17,073 || 19,133 || 3,663 || – || 3,629 || – || – || 43,498 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 22,970 || 48.39% || 11,801 || 24.86% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.66% || 22,970 || 11,169 || 9,135 || – || 3,241 || 243 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|715 || 47,473 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 20,608 || 40.00% || 5,635 || 10.94% || 58.22% || 20,608 || 14,973 || 13,703 || – || 2,234 || – || – || 51,518 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 24,537 || 48.85% || 5,698 || 11.34% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.48% || 18,839 || 24,537 || 4,164 || – || 2,688 || – || – || 50,228 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 23,536 || 46.13% || 5,743 || 11.26% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.31% || 17,793 || 23,536 || 5,950 || – || 3,562 || – || 181 || 51,022 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 15,244 || 48.58% || 5,808 || 18.51% || 49.60% || 9,436 || 15,244 || 4,940 || – || 1,460 || – || 300 || 31,380 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 25,659 || 47.30% || 5,662 || 10.44% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|67.29% || 25,659 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|19,997 || 5,678 || – || 2,908 || – || – || 54,242 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 18,974 || 32.22% || 1,788 || 3.04% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.59% || 17,186 || 18,974 || 9,713 || – || 12,454 || 58 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|504 || 58,889 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 19,657 || 40.83% || 4,080 || 8.47% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.98% || 19,657 || 15,577 || 5,549 || – || 2,041 || 4,821 || 501 || 48,146 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 30,391 || 55.95% || 19,298 || 35.53% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.10% || 30,391 || 11,093 || 7,952 || – || 4,505 || – || 374 || 54,315 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 32,986 || 47.50% || 7,850 || 11.30% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.45% || 32,986 || style="background-color:#EABB94;"|25,136 || 6,118 || – || 4,872 || – || 337 || 69,449 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 20,010 || 49.25% || 10,959 || 26.97% || 50.36% || 9,051 || 7,164 || 20,010 || – || 3,625 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|779 || 40,629 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 19,919 || 41.28% || 6,464 || 13.40% || 56.59% || 11,556 || 13,455 || 19,919 || – || 2,142 || 323 || 853 || 48,248 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 22,796 || 43.65% || 6,786 || 12.99% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.26% || 16,010 || 10,531 || 22,796 || – || 2,884 || – || – || 52,221 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 22,182 || 44.77% || 5,846 || 11.80% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.59% || 22,182 || 16,336 || 7,426 || – || 2,617 || 242 || 747 || 49,550 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 9,395 || 40.46% || 2,051 || 8.83% || 54.48% || 9,395 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|7,344 || 5,394 || – || 1,087 || – || – || 23,220 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 22,734 || 39.15% || 3,839 || 6.61% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.10% || 18,895 || 22,734 || 10,158 || – || 6,282 || – || – || 58,069 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 16,480 || 36.70% || 339 || 0.75% || 57.03% || 16,480 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|16,141 || 8,122 || – || 3,823 || 215 || 127 || 44,908 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,525 || 49.32% || 11,649 || 24.42% || 56.52% || 23,525 || 11,876 || 7,173 || – || 5,124 || – || – || 47,698 | |||
|- style="background-color:#AFEEEE;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 21,830 || 36.06% || 17 || 0.03% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.31% || 21,830 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|21,813 || 8,915 || – || 7,326 || 107 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|543 || 60,534 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 24,516 || 51.28% || 12,704 || 26.58% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.10% || 24,516 || 11,812 || 7,427 || – || 3,386 || – || 663 || 47,804 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 30,272 || 55.88% || 18,463 || 34.08% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.04% || 30,272 || 11,809 || 7,112 || – || 4,629 || – || 347 || 54,169 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 27,473 || 58.44% || 19,398 || 41.27% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.86% || 27,473 || 8,075 || 6,511 || – || 4,522 || – || 426 || 47,007 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 17,672 || 43.06% || 5,013 || 12.22% || 55.11% || 12,659 || 7,774 || 17,672 || – || 2,656 || – || 276 || 41,037 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,018 || 39.13% || 3,306 || 6.15% || 56.97% || 17,712 || 21,018 || 9,387 || – || 5,603 || – || – || 53,720 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 22,556 || 39.09% || 2,121 || 3.68% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.14% || 22,556 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|20,435 || 8,409 || – || 5,630 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|667 || 57,697 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 25,296 || 55.02% || 11,441 || 24.88% || 52.01% || 13,855 || 25,296 || 4,682 || – || 1,921 || – || 225 || 45,979 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,220 || 47.69% || 6,556 || 14.73% || 49.39% || 14,664 || 21,220 || 5,268 || – || 2,947 || – || 395 || 44,494 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 20,457 || 50.16% || 7,180 || 17.61% || 49.13% || 13,277 || 20,457 || 4,632 || – || 2,138 || – || 277 || 40,781 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,863 || 42.71% || 397 || 0.71% || 56.20% || 23,863 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|23,466 || 4,774 || – || 3,636 || – || 129 || 55,868 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 20,518 || 44.22% || 2,152 || 4.64% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.08% || 18,366 || 20,518 || 4,104 || – || 3,407 || – || – || 46,395 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,710 || 45.76% || 4,725 || 9.96% || 56.13% || style="background-color:#EABB94;"|16,985 || 21,710 || 4,710 || – || 3,179 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|857 || – || 47,441 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 39,921 || 55.84% || 23,178 || 32.42% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|69.39% || 39,921 || 16,743 || 6,946 || – || 7,880 || – || – || 71,490 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 24,873 || 46.70% || 6,623 || 12.43% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.07% || 24,873 || 18,250 || 4,548 || – || 4,381 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|1,209 || 53,261 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 24,016 || 46.70% || 10,149 || 19.74% || 54.60% || 24,016 || 13,867 || 9,186 || – || 4,356 || – || – || 51,425 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 28,089 || 51.98% || 15,134 || 28.01% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.69% || 28,089 || 12,955 || 7,980 || – || 3,897 || – || 1,118 || 54,039 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 19,021 || 46.54% || 8,273 || 20.24% || 57.75% || 8,869 || 10,748 || 19,021 || – || 2,056 || 112 || 66 || 40,872 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 18,510 || 44.56% || 5,078 || 12.23% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.42% || 13,432 || 18,510 || 6,582 || – || 2,808 || – || 204 || 41,536 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 27,615 || 48.71% || 11,406 || 20.12% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.75% || 27,615 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|16,209 || 8,230 || – || 4,633 || – || – || 56,687 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 32,028 || 42.24% || 545 || 0.72% || 55.66% || 32,028 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|31,483 || 7,126 || – || 5,184 || – || – || 75,821 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,011 || 46.98% || 5,483 || 9.90% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.34% || 26,011 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|20,528 || 4,143 || – || 4,681 || – || – || 55,363 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 19,951 || 41.37% || 3,201 || 6.64% || 55.25% || 19,951 || 7,741 || 16,750 || – || 3,374 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|415 || 48,231 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 25,399 || 39.74% || 8,766 || 13.71% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|69.11% || 15,065 || 16,633 || 25,399 || – || 6,348 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|473 || 63,918 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 27,244 || 44.91% || 3,695 || 6.09% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|71.34% || 27,244 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|23,549 || 6,025 || – || 3,845 || – || – || 60,663 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 29,035 || 49.91% || 9,618 || 16.53% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.82% || 19,417 || 29,035 || 4,920 || – || 3,939 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|864 || 58,175 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 23,948 || 46.20% || 9,810 || 18.93% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.04% || 14,138 || 23,948 || 8,845 || – || 4,447 || 227 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|230 || 51,835 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 25,109 || 44.98% || 4,948 || 8.86% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.44% || 25,109 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|20,161 || 6,432 || – || 3,558 || 414 || 150 || 55,824 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,330 || 52.68% || 14,744 || 33.29% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.02% || 23,330 || 8,586 || 7,982 || – || 3,355 || – || 1,036 || 44,289 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 20,705 || 42.98% || 3,373 || 7.00% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.60% || 5,992 || 20,705 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|17,332 || – || 3,601 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|549 || 48,179 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 21,831 || 50.19% || 10,960 || 25.19% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.71% || 21,831 || 10,871 || 5,355 || – || 5,119 || 325 || – || 43,501 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" |] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 20,765 || 48.09% || 10,540 || 24.41% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.39% || 20,765 || 10,225 || 7,334 || – || 3,874 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|982 || 43,180 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 27,630 || 47.40% || 9,213 || 15.81% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.32% || 27,630 || 18,417 || 8,115 || – || 4,029 || – || 98 || 58,289 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 22,874 || 49.69% || 7,934 || 17.24% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.22% || 14,940 || 22,874 || 4,875 || – || 3,023 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|321 || 46,033 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,061 || 50.19% || 12,013 || 23.14% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.06% || 26,061 || 14,048 || 7,156 || – || 4,379 || 276 || – || 51,920 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 28,908 || 61.10% || 19,171 || 40.52% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.15% || 28,908 || 9,737 || 5,175 || – || 3,201 || 293 || – || 47,314 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,488 || 47.00% || 5,170 || 11.31% || 52.05% || 16,318 || 21,488 || 4,526 || – || 3,388 || – || – || 45,720 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,474 || 45.90% || 8,822 || 17.25% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.20% || 23,474 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|14,652 || 9,428 || – || 3,477 || – || 113 || 51,144 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 26,286 || 50.61% || 12,338 || 23.76% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.98% || 13,948 || 26,286 || 6,666 || – || 4,726 || – || 312 || 51,938 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,195 || 50.01% || 13,158 || 28.37% || 58.66% || 23,195 || 9,404 || 10,037 || – || 3,201 || – || 545 || 46,382 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 16,572 || 40.43% || 1,111 || 2.71% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.42% || 15,461 || 6,870 || 16,572 || – || 1,774 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|316 || 40,993 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 22,795 || 56.63% || 10,959 || 27.23% || 54.16% || 11,836 || 22,795 || 3,748 || – || 1,870 || – || – || 40,249 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 17,927 || 48.68% || 6,839 || 18.57% || 52.13% || 11,088 || 17,927 || 5,801 || – || 2,011 || – || – || 36,827 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 18,098 || 50.17% || 7,217 || 20.01% || 54.02% || 10,881 || 18,098 || 5,183 || – || 1,913 || – || – || 36,075 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 23,718 || 58.78% || 14,558 || 36.08% || 47.50% || 9,160 || 23,718 || 5,936 || – || 1,207 || – || 331 || 40,352 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 15,486 || 41.83% || 4,558 || 12.31% || 54.74% || 10,928 || 15,486 || 6,943 || – || 3,514 || 151 || – || 37,022 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 30,897 || 55.05% || 18,798 || 33.49% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.10% || 30,897 || 12,099 || 6,288 || – || 5,685 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|1,161 || 56,130 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,328 || 49.66% || 11,658 || 21.99% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.10% || 26,328 || 14,670 || 6,202 || – || 5,821 || – || – || 53,021 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 25,846 || 57.34% || 17,292 || 38.36% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.15% || 25,846 || 8,554 || 6,107 || – || 1,880 || 2,581 || 105 || 45,073 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 15,094 || 35.15% || 2,125 || 4.95% || 58.11% || 11,073 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|12,969 || 15,094 || – || 3,330 || 80 || 397 || 42,943 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,660 || 49.01% || 5,212 || 9.58% || 56.80% || 26,660 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|21,448 || 3,601 || – || 2,686 || – || – || 54,395 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 14,478 || 40.32% || 2,889 || 8.05% || 57.05% || 8,466 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|11,589 || 14,478 || – || 1,377 || – || – || 35,910 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 13,187 || 37.03% || 3,104 || 8.72% || 57.37% || 9,556 || 10,083 || 13,187 || – || 2,463 || – || 327 || 35,616 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 17,188 || 56.54% || 10,448 || 34.37% || 51.00% || 5,536 || 6,740 || 17,188 || – || 938 || – || – || 30,402 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 27,462 || 53.53% || 18,060 || 35.20% || 57.39% || 9,402 || 27,462 || 7,743 || – || 6,081 || 146 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|472 || 51,306 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 20,323 || 44.78% || 6,987 || 15.39% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.91% || 5,287 || 13,336 || 20,323 || – || 5,995 || 130 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|316 || 45,387 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 24,454 || 40.84% || 3,484 || 5.82% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.21% || 8,249 || 20,970 || 24,454 || – || 5,418 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|296 || 491 || 59,878 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 27,773 || 49.18% || 8,383 || 14.84% || 51.92% || 19,390 || 27,773 || 5,442 || – || 3,870 || – || – || 56,475 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 16,842 || 32.91% || 300 || 0.59% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.67% || 16,542 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|14,295 || 16,842 || – || 2,816 || 569 || 114 || 51,178 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 29,191 || 57.63% || 17,879 || 35.30% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.21% || 29,191 || 11,312 || 4,747 || – || 4,987 || – || 414 || 50,651 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 30,704 || 50.99% || 15,244 || 25.32% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.91% || 30,704 || 15,460 || 8,584 || – || 5,067 || – || 395 || 60,210 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 23,889 || 48.67% || 7,958 || 16.21% || 51.92% || 15,931 || 23,889 || 5,011 || – || 3,130 || 260 || 864 || 49,085 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 20,914 || 48.70% || 10,638 || 24.77% || 50.65% || 10,276 || 9,005 || 20,914 || – || 2,749 || – || – || 42,944 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 20,791 || 52.51% || 11,837 || 29.89% || 47.33% || 8,954 || 7,357 || 20,791 || – || 2,253 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|241 || 39,596 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 16,164 || 43.46% || 2,032 || 5.46% || 52.31% || 14,132 || 16,164 || 4,503 || – || 2,390 || – || – || 37,189 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 27,412 || 56.70% || 18,368 || 37.99% || 56.17% || 27,412 || 9,044 || 5,882 || – || 4,887 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|1,120 || 48,345 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 16,071 || 46.60% || 6,430 || 18.64% || 50.35% || 7,021 || 16,071 || 9,641 || – || 1,757 || – || – || 34,490 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | ON || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 16,997 || 59.39% || 11,634 || 40.65% || 48.33% || 4,773 || 16,997 || 5,363 || – || 1,488 || – || – || 28,621 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | PE || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 10,105 || 52.81% || 4,444 || 23.23% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|70.26% || 5,661 || 10,105 || 1,556 || – || 710 || 1,101 || – || 19,133 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | PE || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 8,893 || 50.06% || 3,189 || 17.95% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.10% || 5,704 || 8,893 || 2,187 || – || 858 || – || 124 || 17,766 | |||
|- style="background-color:#AFEEEE;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | PE || style="text-align:left;" | ]<ref group=a>also an open seat</ref> | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 8,110 || 43.93% || 55 || 0.30% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|68.15% || 8,110<ref group=a>] was previously a member of the ].</ref> || 8,055<ref group=a>] was previously a member of the ], as well as ] for a short time in 1996.</ref> || 1,670 || – || 626 || – || – || 18,461 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | PE || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 8,312 || 44.19% || 924 || 4.91% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|71.41% || 7,388 || 8,312 || 1,819 || – || 1,291 || – || – || 18,810 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 10,995 || 39.65% || 2,573 || 9.28% || 49.06% || 8,422 || 5,108 || 2,276 || 10,995 || 928 || – || – || 27,729 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 20,929 || 47.91% || 11,874 || 27.18% || 55.01% || 8,267 || 9,055 || 4,151 || 20,929 || 976 || 302 || – || 43,680 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 18,815 || 39.49% || 423 || 0.89% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.64% || 4,937 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|18,392 || 4,276 || 18,815 || 1,228 || – || – || 47,648 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 20,686 || 38.83% || 5,092 || 9.56% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.05% || 8,662 || 15,594 || 6,406 || 20,686 || 1,665 || 259 || – || 53,272 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 26,455 || 48.10% || 16,471 || 29.95% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.86% || 9,584 || 9,984 || 6,819 || 26,455 || 2,055 || – || 98 || 54,995 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 26,821 || 54.67% || 17,917 || 36.52% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.45% || 8,904 || 7,987 || 4,010 || 26,821 || 1,334 || – || – || 49,056 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 31,883 || 62.41% || 24,740 || 48.43% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.38% || 31,883 || 5,270 || 4,352 || 7,143 || 2,436 || – || – || 51,084 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 26,904 || 50.07% || 16,046 || 29.86% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.22% || 10,858 || 7,995 || 6,214 || 26,904 || 1,764 || – || – || 53,735 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 17,994 || 36.76% || 2,032 || 4.15% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.40% || 17,994 || 7,030 || 5,986 || 15,962 || 1,363 || 610 || – || 48,945 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 24,945 || 45.83% || 12,867 || 23.64% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.75% || 12,078 || 10,035 || 5,684 || 24,945 || 1,691 || – || – || 54,433 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 19,869 || 49.79% || 9,724 || 24.37% || 58.32% || 5,405 || 19,869 || 3,188 || 10,145 || 1,166 || – || 130 || 39,903 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 17,561 || 35.21% || 1,204 || 2.41% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.78% || 9,309 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|16,357 || 4,514 || 17,561 || 1,784 || 354 || – || 49,879 | |||
|- style="background-color:#AFEEEE;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 19,103 || 32.59% || 69 || 0.12% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.57% || 11,062 || 19,103 || 7,452 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|19,034 || 1,816 || – || 157 || 58,624 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 31,773 || 50.08% || 21,124 || 33.30% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|68.41% || 9,564 || 10,649 || 8,998 || 31,773 || 2,460 || – || – || 63,444 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 20,566 || 41.15% || 5,964 || 11.93% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.66% || 20,566 || 7,039 || 6,542 || 14,602 || 1,231 || – || – || 49,980 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 25,086 || 45.58% || 14,982 || 27.22% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.36% || 9,827 || 10,104 || 8,261 || 25,086 || 1,755 || – || – || 55,033 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 19,737 || 41.31% || 3,057 || 6.40% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.25% || 16,680 || 6,425 || 3,742 || 19,737 || 1,193 || – || – || 47,777 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 20,332 || 41.86% || 9,386 || 19.32% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.97% || 9,445 || 10,946 || 5,483 || 20,332 || 2,368 || – || – || 48,574 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 17,613 || 38.79% || 6,123 || 13.49% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.21% || 11,490 || 7,697 || 7,460 || 17,613 || 1,144 || – || – || 45,404 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 14,636 || 40.10% || 4,796 || 13.14% || 54.11% || 8,334 || 9,840 || 2,549 || 14,636 || 1,136 || – || – || 36,495 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 15,189 || 29.15% || 1,577 || 3.03% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.13% || 8,762 || 13,193 || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|13,612 || 15,189 || 1,342 || – || – || 52,098 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 11,984 || 37.53% || 616 || 1.93% || 54.38% || 5,771 || 11,368<ref group=a>] was previously a member of the ].</ref> || 1,497 || 11,984 || 1,139 || 175 || – || 31,934 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 22,720 || 49.73% || 13,278 || 29.07% || 58.24% || 4,201 || 9,442 || 6,600 || 22,720 || 1,946 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|774 || 45,683 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,544 || 43.67% || 7,673 || 15.55% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.16% || 7,549 || 21,544 || 4,986 || 13,871 || 1,380 || – || – || 49,330 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 19,750 || 37.45% || 8,125 || 15.41% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.00% || 7,996 || 19,750 || 10,454 || 11,625 || 2,784 || – || 121 || 52,730 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 17,144 || 34.91% || 1,303 || 2.65% || 57.66% || 5,494 || 15,841 || 7,708 || 17,144 || 2,345 || 577 || – || 49,109 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 28,040 || 52.40% || 18,500 || 34.57% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.02% || 9,540 || 7,769 || 5,579 || 28,040 || 2,588 || – || – || 53,516 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 26,639 || 52.48% || 7,604 || 14.98% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.79% || 26,639 || 2,616 || 2,475 || 19,035 || – || – || – || 50,765 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 25,976 || 56.09% || 18,573 || 40.10% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.46% || 5,179 || 7,403 || 5,975 || 25,976 || 1,340 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|438 || 46,311 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 23,842 || 46.39% || 11,757 || 22.87% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.03% || 12,085 || 23,842 || 8,105 || 2,953 || 4,415 || – || – || 51,400 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 17,226 || 40.60% || 6,842 || 16.13% || 57.82% || 6,802 || 17,226 || 5,622 || 10,384 || 1,579 || 674 || 144 || 42,431 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 24,956 || 47.08% || 10,813 || 20.40% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.40% || 6,914 || 14,143 || 4,896 || 24,956 || 2,094 || – || – || 53,003 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 24,103 || 50.24% || 15,305 || 31.90% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.10% || 2,320 || 8,798 || 8,209 || 24,103 || 3,801 || 93 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|651 || 47,975 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 19,085 || 37.80% || 4,895 || 9.69% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.24% || 9,101 || 14,190 || 6,289 || 19,085 || 1,607 || – || 221 || 50,493 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,603 || 40.45% || 9,027 || 16.90% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.69% || 11,017 || 21,603 || 6,124 || 12,576 || 1,752 || – || 336 || 53,408 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 24,785 || 45.90% || 11,038 || 20.44% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.45% || 24,785 || 8,130 || 5,856 || 13,747 || 1,370 || – || 113 || 54,001 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 23,118 || 46.12% || 12,198 || 24.34% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.89% || 7,210 || 10,920 || 7,021 || 23,118 || 1,752 || – || 103 || 50,124 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 24,495 || 47.27% || 11,757 || 22.69% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.15% || 24,495 || 6,498 || 6,828 || 12,738 || 1,265 || – || – || 51,824 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 20,992 || 36.23% || 4,649 || 8.02% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|70.29% || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|16,343 || 13,669 || 5,403 || 20,992 || 1,408 || – || 119 || 57,934 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 23,683 || 47.14% || 10,353 || 20.61% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.88% || 23,683 || 6,712 || 5,252 || 13,330 || 1,260 || – || – || 50,237 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 15,272 || 49.29% || 6,898 || 22.26% || 49.20% || 8,374 || 4,737 || 1,491 || 15,272 || 1,112 || – || – || 30,986 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 25,552 || 45.53% || 11,824 || 21.07% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|67.41% || 7,759 || 13,728 || 6,907 || 25,552 || 2,178 || – || – || 56,124 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 20,697 || 46.70% || 8,414 || 18.99% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.42% || 20,697 || 6,185 || 4,191 || 12,283 || 959 || – || – || 44,315 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 33,519 || 55.69% || 25,132 || 41.75% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.73% || 8,096 || 8,387 || 8,337 || 33,519 || 1,854 || – || – || 60,193 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 20,494 || 46.03% || 6,854 || 15.39% || 57.49% || 13,640 || 6,835 || 2,428 || 20,494 || 978 || – || 147 || 44,522 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 21,068 || 48.88% || 9,279 || 21.53% || 58.35% || 11,789 || 5,769 || 3,332 || 21,068 || 1,147 || – || – || 43,105 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 19,702 || 55.65% || 10,026 || 28.32% || 52.30% || 9,676 || 19,702 || 2,733 || 1,543 || 1,565 || – || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|186 || 35,405 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 19,554 || 44.62% || 12,446 || 28.40% || 58.09% || 7,108 || 19,554 || 6,641 || 6,962 || 3,378 || – || 177 || 43,820 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 14,348 || 39.53% || 2,343 || 6.46% || 56.61% || 3,820 || 12,005 || style="background-color:#87CEFA;"|14,348 || 4,554 || 1,566 || – || – || 36,293 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 17,724 || 41.47% || 1,189 || 2.78% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.77% || 3,262 || 17,724 || 3,734 || style="background-color:#DCD0FF;"|16,535 || 1,213 || 267 || – || 42,735 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,468 || 46.94% || 9,653 || 21.11% || 57.81% || 11,815 || 21,468 || 4,823 || 4,357 || 3,161 || – || 111 || 45,735 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 14,023 || 32.71% || 3,627 || 8.46% || 54.55% || 14,023 || 10,396 || 6,616 || 9,576 || 2,148 || – || 112 || 42,871 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#DCDCDC;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Ind | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#DCDCDC;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Ind | |||
| 15,063 || 33.49% || 662 || 1.47% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|60.83% || – || 7,320 || 5,707 || 14,401 || 1,452 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|16,102<ref group=a>], the winning candidate, was the incumbent MP</ref> || – || 44,982 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 21,064 || 41.76% || 8,121 || 16.10% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.68% || 12,943 || 8,845 || 5,933 || 21,064 || 1,650 || – || – || 50,435 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 31,007 || 53.05% || 22,154 || 37.91% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.90% || 8,168 || 8,751 || 8,853 || 31,007 || 1,666 || – || – || 58,445 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 23,913 || 46.02% || 8,833 || 17.00% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.57% || 15,080 || 6,599 || 4,509 || 23,913 || 1,337 || 526 || – || 51,964 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 17,652 || 44.69% || 9,715 || 24.59% || 58.73% || 7,216 || 7,937 || 4,084 || 17,652 || 645 || style="background-color:#EABB94;"|1,966 || – || 39,500 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 23,216 || 45.68% || 13,305 || 26.18% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|67.18% || 9,911 || 8,823 || 6,741 || 23,216 || 2,134 || – || – || 50,825 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 26,588 || 53.57% || 19,401 || 39.09% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.26% || 7,170 || 6,755 || 7,187 || 26,588 || 1,656 || 273 || – || 49,629 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 16,055 || 43.54% || 1,436 || 3.89% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|58.99% || style="background-color:#87CEFA;"|16,055 || 3,721 || 1,738 || 14,619 || 737 || – || – || 36,870 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 27,260 || 52.00% || 17,475 || 33.34% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.65% || 3,876 || 9,785 || 8,522 || 27,260 || 2,406 || 83 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|489 || 52,421 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 23,767 || 44.99% || 12,012 || 22.74% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|67.70% || 8,125 || 11,755 || 7,154 || 23,767 || 2,031 || – || – || 52,832 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 22,719 || 47.36% || 12,524 || 26.11% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.12% || 10,195 || 6,649 || 6,721 || 22,719 || 1,682 || – || – || 47,966 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 26,506 || 49.61% || 17,076 || 31.96% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|65.47% || 9,281 || 9,430 || 5,529 || 26,506 || 2,160 || 520 || – || 53,426 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 16,346 || 37.63% || 3,963 || 9.12% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.45% || 6,867 || 12,383 || 6,280 || 16,346 || 1,566 || – || – || 43,442 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 25,095 || 61.72% || 18,096 || 44.51% || 53.55% || 6,999 || 25,095 || 3,654 || 4,611 || – || – || 299 || 40,658 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 21,652 || 57.26% || 16,025 || 42.38% || 53.59% || 5,627 || 21,652 || 4,039 || 5,146 || 1,063 || 122 || 165 || 37,814 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 20,397 || 43.96% || 9,314 || 20.07% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|59.25% || 11,083 || 9,755 || 3,601 || 20,397 || 1,562 || – || – || 46,398 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 21,650 || 42.82% || 10,840 || 21.44% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.14% || 9,927 || 10,810 || 6,323 || 21,650 || 1,848 || – || – || 50,558 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 25,502 || 50.08% || 15,555 || 30.55% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.85% || 8,331 || 9,947 || 6,676 || 25,502 || – || – || 467 || 50,923 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 28,303 || 52.35% || 19,366 || 35.82% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|66.00% || 7,551 || 8,937 || 7,278 || 28,303 || 1,714 || 283 || – || 54,066 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 22,405 || 45.27% || 10,407 || 21.03% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.58% || 11,998 || 9,008 || 4,544 || 22,405 || 1,540 || – || – || 49,495 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 27,044 || 41.34% || 11,548 || 17.65% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|67.76% || 15,496 || 13,954 || 6,298 || 27,044 || 2,625 || – || – || 65,417 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#87CEFA;" | || style="text-align:left;" | BQ | |||
| 27,602 || 50.85% || 18,731 || 34.51% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|71.87% || 7,742 || 8,871 || 8,388 || 27,602 || 1,679 || – || – || 54,282 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | QC || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 18,041 || 46.47% || 9,137 || 23.53% || 50.65% || 6,139 || 18,041 || 8,904 || 2,818 || 2,733 || 47 || 145 || 38,827 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 15,621 || 60.11% || 9,049 || 34.82% || 51.11% || 15,621 || 2,140 || 6,572 || – || 1,287 || – || 368 || 25,988 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 20,747 || 53.95% || 10,871 || 28.27% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.57% || 20,747 || 5,509 || 9,876 || – || 2,325 || – || – || 38,457 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 17,922 || 64.36% || 13,528 || 48.58% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|62.79% || 17,922 || 3,691 || 4,394 || – || 1,840 || – || – || 27,847 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 8,964 || 46.67% || 3,148 || 16.39% || 44.75% || style="background-color:#87CEFA;"|8,964 || 5,816 || 3,414 || – || 733 || – || 282 || 19,209 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 14,159 || 44.12% || 3,294 || 10.26% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.35% || 14,159 || 5,489 || 10,865 || – || 1,580 || – || – || 32,093 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 16,542 || 57.73% || 8,299 || 28.96% || 55.52% || 16,542 || 2,289 || 8,243 || – || 1,413 || – || 167 || 28,654 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 16,053 || 51.09% || 7,090 || 22.56% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.09% || 16,053 || 4,668 || 8,963 || – || 1,737 || – || – || 31,421 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 14,068 || 51.85% || 5,369 || 19.79% || 56.61% || 14,068 || 2,809 || 8,699 || – || 1,556 || – || – || 27,132 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 18,610 || 53.80% || 8,978 || 25.96% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|61.50% || 18,610 || 4,135 || 9,632 || – || 2,211 || – || – || 34,588 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 12,231 || 45.39% || 262 || 0.97% || 54.82% || 12,231 || 1,188 || 11,969 || – || 1,232 || 138 || style="background-color:#F0E68C;"|188 || 26,946 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 18,320 || 56.51% || 10,422 || 32.15% || 58.78% || 18,320 || 4,020 || 7,898 || – || 2,182 || – || – || 32,420 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 19,293 || 70.49% || 14,694 || 53.69% || 58.68% || 19,293 || 1,834 || 4,599 || – || 1,643 || – || – || 27,369 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 17,028 || 46.08% || 4,230 || 11.45% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|64.20% || 12,798 || 17,028 || 5,418 || – || 1,706 || – || – || 36,950 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | SK || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 19,824 || 68.03% || 13,748 || 47.18% || 56.86% || 19,824 || 1,578 || 6,076 || – || 1,664 || – || – || 29,142 | |||
|- style="background-color:#B9E5B9;" | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | Terr || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#6495ED;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Con | |||
| 2,815 || 34.92% || 466 || 5.78% || 47.35% || 2,815 || 2,349 || 2,228 || – || style="background-color:#EEBBBB;"|669 || – || – || 8,061 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | Terr || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#F4A460;" | || style="text-align:left;" |NDP | |||
| 5,669 || 41.45% || 523 || 3.82% || 47.71% || 5,146<ref group=a>] was previously a member of the ]</ref> || 1,858 || 5,669 || – || 752 || – || 252 || 13,677 | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:left;" | Terr || style="text-align:left;" | ] | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
|style="color:inherit;background-color:#EA6D6A;" | || style="text-align:left;" |Lib | |||
| 6,715 || 45.80% || 1,927 || 13.14% || style="background-color:#D8BFD8;"|63.23% || 4,788 || 6,715 || 1,276 || – || 1,881 || – || – || 14,660 | |||
|} | |} | ||
{{reflist|group=a}} | |||
:{{Color box|AFEEEE|border=#BFBFBF}} = went to a judicial recount | |||
==Incumbent MPs not running for re-election== | |||
:{{Color box|#B9E5B9|border=silver}} = Open seat | |||
===Conservatives=== | |||
:{{Color box|#D8BFD8|border=silver}} = turnout is above national average | |||
:{{Color box|#EABB94|border=silver}} = Incumbent had switched allegiance | |||
:{{Color box|#FFFF00|border=silver}} = Previously incumbent in another riding | |||
:{{Color box|#EEBBBB|border=silver}} = Not incumbent; was previously elected to the House | |||
:{{Color box|#87CEFA|border=silver}} = Incumbency arose from by-election gain | |||
:{{Color box|#DCD0FF|border=silver}} = other incumbents defeated | |||
:{{Color box|#F0E68C|border=silver}} = Multiple candidates | |||
===Summary analysis=== | |||
*], ], ] | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:right;" | |||
*], ], ] | |||
|+ Party candidates in 2nd place<ref name="Candidates2008"/> | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="text-align:left;" | Party in 1st place !! colspan="6"|Party in 2nd place !!rowspan="2"|Total | |||
|- | |||
!Con !!Lib !!NDP !!BQ !!Grn !!Ind | |||
|- | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|row-name}} | |||
| ||78 ||50 ||9 ||5 ||1 ||143 | |||
|- | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|row-name}} | |||
|57 || ||13 ||7 || || ||77 | |||
|- | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|row-name}} | |||
|20 ||17 || || || || ||37 | |||
|- | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|row-name}} | |||
|18 ||28 ||3 || || || ||49 | |||
|- | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|row-name}} | |||
| || ||1 ||1 || || ||2 | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="2" style="text-align:left;" | Total | |||
|95 ||123 ||67 ||17 ||5 ||1 ||308 | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:right;" | |||
===Liberals=== | |||
|+ Candidates ranked 1st to 5th place, by party<ref name="Candidates2008"/> | |||
*], ], ] | |||
|- | |||
! style="text-align:left;" | Parties !!1st !!2nd !!3rd !!4th !!5th | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|colour&name}} | |||
|143 ||95 ||56 ||12 ||1 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|colour&name}} | |||
|77 ||123 ||79 ||28 || | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|colour&name}} | |||
|49 ||17 ||5 ||2 ||2 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|colour&name}} | |||
|37 ||67 ||129 ||75 || | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name}} | |||
|2 ||1 ||1 ||3 ||26 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green|colour&name}} | |||
| ||5 ||38 ||185 ||74 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Christian Heritage|colour&name}} | |||
| || || ||1 ||47 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Progressive Canadian|colour&name}} | |||
| || || ||1 ||8 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|NLFirst|colour&name}} | |||
| || || ||1 ||1 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Libertarian|colour&name}} | |||
| || || || ||19 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Marxist-Leninist|colour&name}} | |||
| || || || ||16 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Communist|colour&name}} | |||
| || || || ||10 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Canadian Action|colour&name}} | |||
| || || || ||7 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|Marijuana|colour&name}} | |||
| || || || ||6 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|FPNP|colour&name}} | |||
| || || || ||4 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|AAEVPC|colour&name}} | |||
| || || || ||1 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|neorhino.ca|colour&name}} | |||
| || || || ||1 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;" |{{Canadian party colour|CA|WLP|colour&name}} | |||
| || || || ||1 | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:right;" | |||
===Bloquistes=== | |||
|+ Resulting composition of the ] | |||
*], ], ] | |||
!colspan="2" rowspan="2"| Source !!colspan="6"|Party | |||
|- | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}} align="center" |'''Con''' | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}} align="center" |'''Lib''' | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}} align="center" |'''NDP''' | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}} align="center" |'''Bloc''' | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|background}} align="center" |'''Ind''' | |||
!Total | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="3" style="text-align:left;"|Seats retained ||style="text-align:left;"|Incumbents returned | |||
|105 ||66 ||24 ||42 ||1 ||238 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;"|Open seats held | |||
|12 ||7 ||2 ||5 || ||26 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;"|Ouster of incumbent changing allegiance | |||
|1 ||1 || ||1 || ||3 | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="4" style="text-align:left;"|Seats changing hands ||style="text-align:left;"|Incumbents defeated | |||
|17 ||3 ||6 ||1 || ||27 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;"|Open seats gained | |||
|6 || ||4 || || ||10 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;"|Byelection gains held | |||
|2 || ||1 || || ||3 | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:left;"|Incumbent changing allegiance | |||
| || || || ||1 ||1 | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="2" style="text-align:left;"|'''Total''' | |||
|143 ||77 ||37 ||49 ||2 ||308 | |||
|} | |||
===Significant results among independent and minor party candidates=== | |||
===New Democrats=== | |||
Those candidates not belonging to a major party, receiving more than 1,000 votes in the election, are listed below:<ref name="Candidates2008"/> | |||
===Independents=== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
==External links== | |||
|- | |||
===Government links=== | |||
!Riding !!Party !! Candidates !!Votes !! Placed | |||
* | |||
|- | |||
** | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} || Rogere Richard || style="text-align:right;" |4,836||3rd | |||
* | |||
|- | |||
* | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} || Kirk Schmidt || style="text-align:right;" |1,790 ||5th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} ||Larry McGuire ||style="text-align:right;" |1,101 ||4th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} || ] || style="text-align:right;" |27,303 ||1st | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} || James Ford || style="text-align:right;" |15,960 ||2nd | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} || ] || style="text-align:right;" |4,821 ||4th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Christian Heritage|colour&name|short}} || Geoffrey Capp || style="text-align:right;" |1,094 ||5th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Progressive Canadian|colour&name|short}} || ] || style="text-align:right;" |1,004 ||5th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Christian Heritage|colour&name|short}} || Dave Bylsma || style="text-align:right;" |1,118 ||5th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Christian Heritage|colour&name|short}} || Shaun MacDonald || style="text-align:right;" |1,036 ||5th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} || ] || style="text-align:right;" |15,063 ||1st | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} || Jean Paradis || style="text-align:right;" |1,039 ||6th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Christian Heritage|colour&name|short}} || David Reimer || style="text-align:right;" |1,170 ||5th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} || ] ||style="text-align:right;" |1,966 ||5th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Christian Heritage|colour&name|short}} || Peter Van der Zaag || style="text-align:right;" |1,018 ||5th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Christian Heritage|colour&name|short}} || Rod Taylor || style="text-align:right;" |1,125 ||5th | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|colour&name|short}} || ] || style="text-align:right;" |2,581 ||4th | |||
|} | |||
=== |
===Results by province=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
* | |||
|- style="background:#ccc;" | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;" colspan="3"|Party name | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* via Democracies Online | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* - Conservative Blogs | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* - Liberal Blogs | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
* - New Democrat Blogs | |||
! style="text-align:center;"|Total | |||
* - About proportional representation | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|row}} | |||
| rowspan="2"|] | |||
| Seats: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''22''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''27''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''13''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''9''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''51''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''10''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''6''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''3''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''-''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|- | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|- | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''143''' | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|row}} | |||
| Vote: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|44.4 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|64.6 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|53.7 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|48.8 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|39.2 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|21.7 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|39.4 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|26.1 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|36.2 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|16.5 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|34.8 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|37.6 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|32.8 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|37.6 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|row}} | |||
| rowspan="2"|] | |||
| Seats: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''5''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|- | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''38''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''14''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''3''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''5''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''3''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''6''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|- | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|- | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''77''' | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|row}} | |||
| Vote: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|19.3 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|11.4 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|14.9 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|19.1 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|33.8 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|23.7 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|32.4 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|29.8 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|47.7 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|46.6 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|29.2 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|13.6 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|45.3 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|26.2 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|row}} | |||
| rowspan="2"|] | |||
| Seats: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''49''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''49''' | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|row}} | |||
| Vote: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|38.1 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|10.0 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|row}} | |||
| rowspan="2"|] | |||
| Seats: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''9''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|- | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''4''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''17''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''2''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|- | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|- | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|- | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''37''' | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|row}} | |||
| Vote: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|25.0 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|12.7 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|25.6 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|24.0 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|18.2 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|12.2 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|21.9 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|28.9 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|9.8 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|33.9 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|27.6 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|41.5 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|9.0 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|18.2 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green|row-name}} | |||
| Vote: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|9.4 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|8.8 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|5.6 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|6.8 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|8.0 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|3.5 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|6.2 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|8.0 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|4.7 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|1.7 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|8.4 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|5.5 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|13.0 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|6.8 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Inde|row}} | |||
| rowspan="2"|] | |||
| Seats: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''1''' | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|'''2''' | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Inde|row}} | |||
| Vote: | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|0.6 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|6.6 | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| | |||
| style="text-align:right;"|0.7 | |||
{{Canadian party colour|CA|Inde|row}} | |||
|Total seats: | |||
! style="text-align:right;"| | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|36 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|28 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|14 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|14 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|106 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|75 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|10 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|11 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|4 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|7 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|1 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|1 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|1 | |||
! style="text-align:right;"|308 | |||
|} | |||
==Seats that changed hands== | |||
===Party websites=== | |||
{|class="wikitable" align="left" | |||
===Incumbent MPs not running for re-election=== | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Conservative/row}} | |||
| | |||
====Conservatives==== | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Liberal/row}} | |||
|width="225"| | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/BQ/row}} | |||
!colspan=2|Electoral District | |||
| | |||
!colspan=2|Resigning incumbent | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/NDP/row}} | |||
!colspan=2|Succeeded by | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Green/row}} | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NL | |||
| | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>{{cite news |title=Veteran St. John's MP Doyle retiring from politics |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/veteran-st-john-s-mp-doyle-retiring-from-politics-1.642445 |work=CBC News |date=March 13, 2007}}</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NL | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref name="theglobeandmail1">{{cite news |last1=Chase |first1=Steven |title=Emerson won't run, sources say |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/emerson-wont-run-sources-say/article1059958/ |work=The Globe and Mail |date=September 3, 2008}}</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080914144942/http://www.tbsource.com/Localnews/index.asp?cid=111281 |date=September 14, 2008 }}, '']'', September 5, 2008</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|MB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>, '']'', January 10, 2008</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|SK | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>{{cite news |title=Sask. MP Batters won't run again, citing depression |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/sask-mp-batters-won-t-run-again-citing-depression-1.768611 |work=CBC News |date=September 2, 2008}}</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|SK | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>{{cite news |title=Sask. Tory MP says he won't run again |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/sask-tory-mp-says-he-won-t-run-again-1.693184 |work=CBC News |date=January 9, 2007}}</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|SK | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080916200357/http://www.canada.com/topics/news/politics/story.html?id=c7ed3241-2d5a-4ec0-ab28-89622184137a |date=September 16, 2008 }}, '']'', August 3, 2007</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|AB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>, '']'', October 10, 2007</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|AB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>{{cite news |title=Edmonton-St. Albert MP won't run again |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-st-albert-mp-won-t-run-again-1.589908 |work=CBC News |date=August 11, 2006}}</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|AB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070311080825/http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/cityplus/story.html?id=d2b9dd9e-6b5a-4e6f-a35f-faa3a1a32dda&k=50425 |date=March 11, 2007 }}, '']'', August 18, 2006</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|AB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>, '']'', September 3, 2008</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|AB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080916205839/http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/city/story.html?id=a125836d-91d5-4ec2-8df0-2f822f314771 |date=September 16, 2008 }}, '']'', February 8, 2008</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|AB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071208120756/http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=fdbe2ed5-f770-4440-b329-2f362ef0a5f2 |date=December 8, 2007 }}, '']'', June 19, 2007</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|BC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>, ''bettyhinton.ca'', October 10, 2007</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|BC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|]<ref name="theglobeandmail1"/> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |} | ||
{|class="wikitable" align="left" | |||
====Liberals==== | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/AAEVP/row}} | |||
|width="225"| | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Canadian Action/row}} | |||
!colspan=2|Electoral District | |||
| | |||
!colspan=2|Resigning incumbent | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Christian Heritage/row}} | |||
!colspan=2|Succeeded by | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Communist/row}} | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NL | |||
| | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/All Nations/row}} | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|width="225"| | |||
|]<ref>{{cite news |title=Time right to retire, Liberal MP Matthews says |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/time-right-to-retire-liberal-mp-matthews-says-1.642443 |work=CBC News |date=April 3, 2007}}</ref> | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Labour/row}} | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|PEI | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>{{cite news |title=Veteran P.E.I. MP to retire |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/veteran-p-e-i-mp-to-retire-1.650443 |work=CBC News |date=March 7, 2007}}</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080916010247/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070305/andy_scott_070305/20070305?hub=Politics |date=September 16, 2008 }}, '']'', March 5, 2007</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>, '']'', December 13, 2006</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>, '']'', September 5, 2008</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>{{cite news |title=Etobicoke MP will not run in next election |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/etobicoke-mp-will-not-run-in-next-election-1.764620 |work=CBC News |date=February 21, 2008}}</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>, '']'', March 7, 2007</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>, '']'', April 11, 2007</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080917121656/http://www.northernlife.ca/news/LocalNews/2006/11-16-06-bonin_retires.asp?NLStory=11-16-06-bonin_retires |date=September 17, 2008 }}, '']'', November 16, 2006</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>{{cite news |title=Outspoken Liberal MP Wappel retiring |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/outspoken-liberal-mp-wappel-retiring-1.660887 |work=CBC News |date=March 23, 2007}}</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NU | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927012134/http://www.nunatsiaq.com/archives/61222/news/nunavut/61222_01.html |date=September 27, 2007 }}, '']'', December 22, 2006</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |} | ||
{|class="wikitable" align="left" width="250" | |||
====Bloc Québécois==== | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Libertarian/row}} | |||
|width="225"| | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Marijuana/row}} | |||
!colspan=2|Electoral District | |||
| | |||
!colspan=2|Resigning incumbent | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Marxist-Leninist/row}} | |||
!colspan=2|Succeeded by | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Progressive Conservatives/row}} | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
{{Canadian_politics/party_colours/Western Canada Concept/row}} | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>{{cite news |title=Priest MP leaves politics after pressure from Vatican |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/priest-mp-leaves-politics-after-pressure-from-vatican-1.730234 |work=CBC News |date=September 3, 2008}}</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |} | ||
<br clear="all" /> | |||
====New Democrats==== | |||
{{Canelections}} | |||
{{election canada}} | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
{{sequence| | |||
!colspan=2|Electoral District | |||
prev=]| | |||
!colspan=2|Resigning incumbent | |||
list=]s| | |||
!colspan=2|Succeeded by | |||
next=41st federal election | |||
|- | |||
}} | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NS | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080916010314/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080602/mcdonough_retires_080602/ |date=September 16, 2008 }}, '']'', June 2, 2008</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|MB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080916010252/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070315/blaikie_reelection_070315/20070315?hub=Canada |date=September 16, 2008 }}, '']'', March 15, 2007</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|BC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|]<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080916210313/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=dfb292ec-1b3d-4e22-bf9c-f86af9b73d57 |date=September 16, 2008 }}, '']'', July 16, 2008</ref> | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |||
===Vacancies upon dissolution=== | |||
] in four vacant ridings were cancelled when the general election was called. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!colspan=2|Electoral District | |||
!colspan=2|Previous MP | |||
!colspan=2|New MP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |||
===Defeated incumbents=== | |||
====Conservatives==== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!colspan=2 |Electoral District | |||
!colspan=2|Incumbent | |||
!colspan=2|Defeated by | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NL | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|AB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |||
====Liberals==== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!colspan=2 |Electoral District | |||
!colspan=2|Incumbent | |||
!colspan=2|Defeated by | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NS | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|NB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|MB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|MB | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|BC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|BC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |||
====New Democrats==== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!colspan=2|Electoral District | |||
!colspan=2|Incumbent | |||
!colspan=2|Defeated by | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|ON | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|BC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |||
====Bloc Québécois==== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!colspan=2|Electoral District | |||
!colspan=2|Incumbent | |||
!colspan=2|Defeated by | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|]<ref>, '']'', October 24, 2008.</ref> | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |||
====Greens==== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!colspan=2|Electoral District | |||
!colspan=2|Incumbent | |||
!colspan=2|Defeated by | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|BC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |||
====Independents==== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!colspan=2|Electoral District | |||
!colspan=2|Incumbent | |||
!colspan=2|Defeated by | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|QC | |||
| style="background:whitesmoke;"|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Independent|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ|background}}| | |||
|] | |||
|} | |||
==See also== | |||
{{Portal|Canada|Politics}} | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==Notes== | |||
{{notelist}} | |||
==References== | |||
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} | |||
{{reflist|group=lower-roman}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
* {{citation |last1 =Pammett|first1 =Jon H |first2= Christopher |last2=Dornan|year =2009 |title =The Canadian Federal Election of 2008 |url =https://books.google.com/books?id=NAtePUeHIh0C&q=Canadian%20federal%20general%20elections&pg=PP1 |publisher=Dundurn Press |isbn= 9781554884070 }} | |||
==External links== | |||
*{{wikisource inline}} | |||
===Projections and predictions=== | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* Daily chart tracking of average of 11 Riding Projection models | |||
* | |||
{{Canadian federal election, 2008A}} | |||
{{election canada}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 21:04, 6 January 2025
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
← outgoing memberselected members → | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
308 seats in the House of Commons 155 seats needed for a majority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Opinion polls | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnout | 58.8% (5.9pp) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results by electoral district, shaded by winners' vote share Results by province and territory | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 2008 Canadian federal election was held on October 14, 2008, to elect members to the House of Commons of Canada of the 40th Canadian Parliament after the previous parliament had been dissolved by Governor General Michaëlle Jean on September 7, 2008.
Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper called the election due to his belief that there was a lack of cooperation between the minority government Conservatives and the opposition parties, which the former had to rely on to pass legislation; hence Harper argued that Parliament had reached the end of its productiveness.
The election resulted in a second but stronger minority government for Harper's Conservatives. While they were a dozen seats away from a majority government, the Liberal Party led by Stéphane Dion lost 18 seats as the New Democratic Party and the Bloc Québécois made slight gains. The Green Party failed to win any seats and lost its only Member of Parliament. Following the election, the Liberals and New Democrats attempted to form a coalition government and topple the Conservatives from power, but were unsuccessful in doing so.
Background
See also: Fixed election dates in CanadaIn 2007, Parliament passed a law fixing federal election dates every four years and scheduling the next election date as October 19, 2009, but the law did not limit the powers of the Governor General to dissolve Parliament at any time, such as when opposition parties bring down the government on a vote of confidence. In this election there was no loss of a non-confidence vote, but the Prime Minister asked the Governor General to call an election. The Governor General granted the Prime Minister's request.
2006 election
64.7% of eligible voters cast ballots in the 2006 federal election. The Conservative Party received the most votes of any single party, with 36% of the vote, and won 124 seats (127 at dissolution). The Liberal Party won fewer seats than in 2004 – 103 seats (96 at dissolution), and 30% of the vote. The Bloc Québécois lost three seats, lowering its total to 51 seats (48 at dissolution), with 10.5% of the vote. The NDP retained its seats held at the dissolution of Parliament, and won 11 more, making its total 29 seats (30 at dissolution), with 17.5% of the vote. The Green Party received 4.5% of the vote, a minimal increase from the previous election, but did not win any seats (1 at dissolution). Independents and other parties constituted 1% of the total vote with one independent winning a seat.
Events since the 2006 election
Further information: 39th Canadian Parliament Conservatives (143) Liberals (77) Bloc Québécois (49) New Democrats (37) Independent (2)Since the 2006 election, seven Members of Parliament (MPs) had changed party: David Emerson, Wajid Khan, and Joe Comuzzi from Liberal to Conservative; Garth Turner from Conservative to Independent to Liberal; Blair Wilson from Liberal to Independent to Green; Louise Thibault from Bloc Québécois to Independent; and Bill Casey from Conservative to Independent. In by-elections, the NDP gained one seat from the Liberal Party, while the Conservative Party gained two seats, one from the Liberals and one from the Bloc Québécois. Four seats were vacant when the election was called: three previously held by the Liberal Party, one by the Bloc Québécois.
The parliament preceding this election was led by the Conservatives, who governed with the smallest plurality ever in the Canadian House of Commons, just 40.6% of the seats. Although the average length of a minority parliament in Canada is 1 year, 5 months, and 22 days (measured from the return of the writs after an election to the dissolution of that parliament), minorities led by the former Progressive Conservative Party have been much shorter: the longest previous Conservative minority was just 6 months and 19 days. The 39th Parliament became Canada's longest serving Conservative minority on October 24, 2006.
On May 30, 2006, the Conservatives tabled An Act to Amend the Canada Elections Act, which would amend the Canada Elections Act to provide fixed election dates. The bill received royal assent on May 3, 2007. The bill states that there will be an election in 2009, and it would be the first to have a fixed election date, the third Monday in October (October 19, 2009). Despite the bill, on September 7, 2008, the Prime Minister sought the dissolution of the 39th Parliament, and the Governor General agreed to hold a general election on October 14, 2008.
On February 15, 2007, The Globe and Mail reported that the Conservatives were preparing for an election expected to be called shortly after the 2007 budget, due on March 19, 2007. Part of the reason for the timing of the election was given as strengthening Conservative poll numbers coupled with the desire to take advantage of the perception that Harper has "better leadership qualities than Liberal counterpart Stéphane Dion".
On March 17, 2007, an internal Conservative Party memo was leaked to The Canadian Press, telling members that they "need to be ready to campaign within the next week". The memo asked members to donate $75 to $150 to help to fund the early stages of the election campaign. None of these predictions for a federal election to occur in 2007 proved true, but the majority of pundits still believed a federal election would be triggered before the fixed election date of October 19, 2009, for sometime in 2008.
Stephen Harper hinted at the possibility of dissolving parliament on August 14, 2008. Speaking in Newfoundland and Labrador, he cited Stéphane Dion as the main player in making Parliament become increasingly "dysfunctional". "I'm going to have to make a judgment in the next little while as to whether or not this Parliament can function productively," Harper said. This came after repeated confidence votes that resulted in the NDP and Bloc parties not voting in favour of the government, and the Liberal Party voting in favour or not attending the vote. Rumours of a possible fall election were further fuelled by Harper's announcement of a fourth federal by-election for September 22 in the Toronto riding of Don Valley West.
On August 27, 2008, Harper asked Governor General Michaëlle Jean to cancel her trip to the Paralympic Games in Beijing, adding fuel to speculation that the Prime Minister would seek a dissolution. On September 7, 2008 after much speculation, Harper asked the Governor General to call a federal election on October 14, 2008.
Timeline
Main article: 2008 Timeline of the Canadian federal election- February 6, 2006: Harper Cabinet is sworn in.
- May 3, 2007: Bill C-16 receives Royal Assent. This bill states that the next election must be held on October 19, 2009, unless there is an earlier dissolution.
- August 26, 2008: Harper indicates he may call an election for the fall of 2008; Parliament could be dissolved as early as the week of September 1–6.
- August 29, 2008: Harper meets with Gilles Duceppe, the leader of the Bloc Québécois in an attempt to find common ground between the Bloc and the Conservatives.
- August 30, 2008:
- Former Liberal MP Blair Wilson joins the Green Party after being an Independent for nearly a year in the riding of West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country in British Columbia. Wilson becomes the first Member of Parliament for the Green Party.
- Harper meets with Jack Layton, the leader of the New Democrats in an attempt to find common ground between the NDP and the Conservatives.
- September 1, 2008: Harper meets with Stéphane Dion, the leader of the Liberals, in an attempt to find common ground between the Liberals and the Conservatives, and avert the dissolution of Parliament, allowing the fall session to continue as planned. However, after a twenty-minute meeting at 24 Sussex Drive, the PM's official residence, Dion emerges stating there is no common ground between the two parties, and that an election is certain.
- September 5, 2008: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) announces that Prime Minister Stephen Harper will visit the Governor General at 9:00 am on September 7, 2008 to ask for the dissolution of the 39th Parliament and a general election on October 14, 2008.
- September 7, 2008: Prime Minister Harper asks Governor General Michaëlle Jean to call a general election on October 14, 2008. She accepts the request.
- October 14, 2008: Elections held for members of the House of Commons in the 40th Canadian Parliament.
- November 4, 2008: Writs to be returned to the Chief Election Officer.
- November 18, 2008: 40th Parliament summoned.
- December 1, 2008: The Liberals and NDP sign agreement on proposed coalition government to replace the governing Conservatives under Prime Minister Harper.
- December 1, 2008: The Liberals, NDP, and Bloc Québécois sign "policy accord" whereby the Bloc would support a Liberal/NDP government for at least 18 months.
- December 4, 2008: Parliament prorogued by the Governor General during the parliamentary dispute on advice of the Prime Minister.
- January 26, 2009: Parliament to reconvene for second session.
Pre-election
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he was considering calling an election because of a lack of cooperation in Parliament, saying "all the signs indicate that this Parliament is at the end of its productiveness," while in Inuvik, Northwest Territories. The Conservative Party of Canada fueled rumours of an oncoming election when it released several campaign advertisements that focused on a range of issues, and attacked the Liberal Party of Canada for their proposed carbon tax. The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) confirmed that Harper would call an election for October 14 after meeting with New Democratic Party leader Jack Layton and Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe, which gave the Prime Minister little hope that a fall session of Parliament can be productive, PMO officials said. Senior government officials announced on the first of September that Stephen Harper would ask the Governor General, Michaëlle Jean, to dissolve parliament and call an election for October 14, after he met with Liberal leader Stéphane Dion who called the meeting a "charade". Dion said the two were unable to agree on how to make the upcoming session of Parliament, slated to begin September 15, more productive.
Liberal Party members gathered in Winnipeg on September 2, for a three-day caucus which changed from preparing for a new parliamentary session to a strategy session to formulate a plan to attack the Conservatives while healing internal party rifts that have surfaced in recent weeks. Conservatives began spending at least $60 million on pre-election funding projects to a wide variety of institutions and groups. A few announcements have been big, including Industry Minister Jim Prentice's pledge of $25 million for the expansion of the Northlands exhibition facility in Edmonton. But the Tories have also announced a number of smaller projects, including $40,000 for the 2008 55+ Games and $25,000 for the Peace Window of the Holy Trinity Anglican Church in Winnipeg. The announcements have also been spread out across the country. The Atlantic region is to get more than $500,000 for youth jobs and eight cultural organizations. The Association of Book Publishers of British Columbia will receive $81,000. Jack Layton attacked the Conservative Party as bribing the public and doing the same thing they used to complain about the Liberals doing before elections.
A survey conducted by Environics found that 38 per cent of Canadians would vote for the Conservative party if an election were held immediately, 28 per cent would vote for the Liberal party, 19 for the NDP, eight for the Bloc Québécois and seven for the Green party. The poll shows Conservatives taking early leads in Ontario, British Columbia and the Prairies. In Atlantic Canada, Liberals still hold a strong majority, while in Quebec the Bloc Québécois leads while the Conservatives and Liberals are almost tied for second. When asked, most Canadians said the Conservatives would handle the economy better, while most said the Liberals would handle the environment better.
On September 7, Harper officially asked for the dissolution of Parliament, and called for an election on October 14.
Election campaign
The 40th Canadian Federal Election campaign officially began at 8:20 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time when Governor General Michaëlle Jean accepted Stephen Harper's request to dissolve Parliament and call an election for October 14, 2008. The party leaders jumped right into the campaign, with Stéphane Dion attacking the Conservative's record, presenting the Liberal plan, and rejected the accusation by Harper that the Liberal party is a risky choice. Jack Layton took a more forceful approach than previous elections, in which the New Democratic Party has just tried to maintain a high number of seats in Parliament to influence government. Layton has made it clear he will campaign for the position of prime minister itself this time, but also returned to a longstanding NDP theme: alleged abuses by big business. He promised to stop what he called "ripoffs" by big oil, cellphone and banks, and his attacks are expected to focus on the Conservatives and all but ignore the Liberals. Elizabeth May of the Green Party said Canadians would care enough about the environment to vote for her party, as long as she was able to get into the television debates. Stephen Harper has stated his objection to including the Green Party into television debates because of the similar policies of the Green and Liberal party, and how it would be unfair. Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe said the Conservatives must be prevented from winning a majority, and the BQ is the only party that can do that. Duceppe compared Harper to US President George W. Bush, and said the government is incompetent.
Leaders' Debates
The two Leaders' Debates of 2008, one each in French and English, included the leaders of five parties, Stephen Harper of the Conservatives, Stéphane Dion of the Liberals, Jack Layton of the NDP, Gilles Duceppe of the Bloc Québécois and Elizabeth May of the Green Party.
The French-language debate aired on Wednesday, October 1 from 8 to 10 p.m. EDT, moderated by Stéphan Bureau, a journalist and host. The English-language debate aired Thursday, October 2 from 9 to 11 p.m. EDT, with Steve Paikin of TVOntario as moderator.
Participation
Three parties — the Conservatives, the Bloc Québécois and the NDP — opposed the inclusion of the Green Party, citing statements made by Green Party leader Elizabeth May to the effect that the best outcome of the election would be a Liberal-led government, and a deal struck between the Green Party and Liberals where the Liberals would not run in May's riding, Central Nova, and the Green party in Liberal leader Stéphane Dion's riding, Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, which they say make May a "second Liberal candidate".
Stephen Harper and Jack Layton are reported to have said that if the Green Party were included, they would not participate in the Leaders' Debates. Dion said that while he supports May's inclusion, he would not attend if Harper does not, and the Bloc Québécois has stated it will not boycott the debates if May is included. The media consortium in charge of the debate, made up of the CBC, CTV, Global Television and TVA, had decided that it would prefer to broadcast the debates with the four major party leaders, rather than risk not at all or with minimal participation. The Green Party indicated they had begun procedures to lodge a formal complaint with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, as they have in past federal elections.
On September 10, Harper and Layton released statements that they would not oppose May's inclusion in the debate, citing public backlash and protests — with neither acknowledging making the threat of boycotting the debate — and that the media consortium would reconvene to discuss the matter. Layton stated that "debating about the debate" had become a "distraction", and that he had only one condition, that Stephen Harper be there. In response, spokespeople for Stephen Harper announced they would not stand alone in opposition to the Green Party's inclusion in the debates and also changed their position on the matter. Later that day the consortium announced that May would be allowed to participate in the debate.
Format change
On September 30, Harper announced that he would ask for the 12 minutes on the economy scheduled for the Leader's Debate to be extended to an hour, citing that the 2007–2008 financial crisis "has deepened since the debate format was finalized", a change which would require agreement from the other parties in the debate to be approved. The NDP released a statement soon after that they supported the move, while public response has been concerned that other topics such as the environment would not end up with enough time to cover the issue.
On October 1, the day of the first debate, it was announced that both debates would get extended time, from 12 to 30 minutes, for the economy, and leaders would not give opening and closing statements, to allow for longer discussions on the economy without removing time from other topics. It was also revealed that instead of leaders standing at individual podiums for the debate, as had been done in past years, the debate would be done in a round table format.
Debates
French debate
Much of the French debate revolved around the economy and the environment, with the two topics repeatedly being brought up in discussions allotted for other topics. Stephen Harper came under criticism from every other leader in nearly every topic, especially the economy and environment, with the other party leaders stating that Harper's politics had led to Canada's current crises in those two areas. Their points included that Harper's environmental plan was considered the worst of all developed countries by organizations around the world, with Elizabeth May labeling it "a type of fraud", and that his attempts to remove regulations in the financial sectors, similar to those done by the Bush administration in the United States, have led Canada to being nearly as hard hit by the 2007–2008 financial crisis as the United States.
Continuous comparisons of Harper to George W. Bush were made over the course of the debate, with Jack Layton stating at one point that with Bush ending his presidency at the end of the year, Harper would be "the last leader of a developed country to follow the Bush doctrine".
English debate
Following the same tone as the French debate, much of the discussion revolved around the economy and the environment. The other four leaders keep criticizing Harper, especially for his lack of an economic platform despite asking for the format change to focus more on the economy due to the Great Recession, and instead using the time to criticize the economic platforms of the other leaders. May lashed out at Harper for not understanding that Canadians were worried about their homes, jobs and finances, and comparing the current situation to Dutch disease, Dion stated that the only thing that keeps Canada from being hit as hard by the crisis as the US are laws created by the previous Liberal government that the Conservatives had been attempting to overturn, Duceppe repeatedly criticized Harper for financial practices and attitudes similar to the Bush administration, and Layton at one point stated that Harper's position showed he was either incompetent or uncaring to the situation, and asked which one he was, to which Harper did not respond. Harper also came under criticism for his laissez-faire attitude to the job sector, supporting primarily the oil companies and companies that outsource jobs in the manufacturing sector.
When it turned to the environment, the Carbon Tax proposal came up repeatedly, with both Dion and May supporting it, although May to more ambitious figures than Dion, pointing out it was the most recommended and proven way to deal with carbon emissions by countries and organizations around the world, noting the growth that Sweden and Germany have had with this system. Harper criticized the plan, saying would increase taxpayers' burden and that Dion should be "honest with the people" that some environmental measures will cost the economy and said the plan includes $40 billion in carbon taxes and $26 billion in tax cuts. Dion defended the Liberal's Green Shift, saying that " not true at all", and that "for every dollar that we will raise, you will have a tax cut, and these tax cuts will be on your income". Duceppe commented that he would like targets to be applied to individual provinces, thereby allowing Quebec to financially benefit due to already-implemented greenhouse gas reductions. Layton, who favours a cap-and-trade system, said that it is a "figment of Mr. Harper's imagination" that emissions will fall under his plan. When Harper sought to outline his government's record on other environmental fronts, giving examples of his minority government supported the preservation of hundreds of thousands of hectares of environmentally sensitive land through the Nature Conservancy of Canada, and that the government declared a protected marine area by Lake Superior and created a whale sanctuary by Baffin Island, May responded by saying "The only word he said that's true is on national parks".
Layton also criticized Dion for his lack of accomplishments as official opposition during the minority government, and his party's previous leader's broken promises in areas such as Child Care and Pharmacare.
Duceppe painted the Conservative government's $45 million in national arts and culture funding cuts as an assault on the province's identity, saying "How can you recognize the Quebec nation and then cut culture , which is the soul of a nation?" followed by citing the economic benefits of culture.
Harper also said he had erred in calling for Canada's participation in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, saying "It was absolutely an error, it's obviously clear", adding that the claim of weapons of mass destruction proved false.
Commenting on the debate, Layton said that he "thoroughly enjoyed" May's contributions to the debate. Reporter Julie Van Dusen said that Harper managed to take the hits calmly, as "someone must have told him ... if you fight back or get too partisan, you're going to alienate voters, especially women". Duceppe said he was happy to have forced Harper to admit his support of joining the Iraq war in 2003 was a mistake, adding he will use the admission in the campaign as "Exhibit A" that the Conservative leader lacks solid judgment skills, and that Harper was weakened when he confirmed he does not support a refundable tax credit for the manufacturing industry to encourage companies to improve productivity.
Issues
Arts
Stephen Harper had cut $45 million from arts funding while in office, a move that drew much criticism from the other leaders and Quebec citizens, with most leaders seeking to restore the funding. The Conservatives have stated that the money is being reallocated to other arts and cultural programs, including various official languages projects, the 400th anniversary of Quebec City and projects connected with the 2010 Vancouver-Whistler Winter Olympic Games, although the Conservative's refusal to have a parliamentary review of their cuts and for a moratorium on the measures until the House of Commons Heritage Committee had a chance to hold hearings on culture and arts funding has most opposition members calling foul.
Both Stéphane Dion and Jack Layton have promised to reverse the cut, with Dion also promising to increase funding to Canada Council for the Arts to $360 million, while Layton also promised to bring income averaging for artists to the national level and providing an annual tax exemption of $20,000 for income earned by copyright and residuals, stating that "one of the key things we must do, before we start giving $50-billion tax giveaways to banks and oil companies, is to protect and promote the arts" and "stable, sure and appropriate funding" for CBC/Radio-Canada while also protecting Telefilm Canada and the Canadian Television Fund.
Harper has said that he believes that the issue is a "niche topic", and that "ordinary Canadians" are not particularly concerned with the issue. A group of Canadian performers, which included Art Hindle, Wendy Crewson and Gordon Pinsent, held a press conference on September 24, saying the cuts would cripple the Canadian arts industry.
On September 29, Harper unveiled a new tax credit plan worth an estimated $150 million a year to encourage parents to enroll their kids in arts programs like music and drama. The credit will apply on up to $500 of eligible fees for children under 16 who participate in eligible arts activities. Harper said that " spend a lot more on culture and arts" but "in a way that we ensure is an effective use of taxpayers' money and ultimately, in this case, benefits families and all of society as well". Harper has come under criticism when the week before he expressed his opinion that "ordinary working people were unable to relate to taxpayer-subsidized cultural elites when they see them at a rich gala on television".
Alleged Cadman bribe attempt
Main article: Chuck Cadman § Legal controversyIn early 2008 it was alleged that Independent MP Chuck Cadman of Surrey North, who was terminally ill with cancer at the time, had been offered a million dollar life insurance policy in exchange for voting against the proposed Liberal budget in May 2005, which he turned down. Under section 119 of the Criminal Code, it is illegal to bribe an MP. Accordingly, Opposition Liberal party Intergovernmental Affairs critic Dominic LeBlanc asked the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) in February 2008 to investigate this allegation. In May 2008, the RCMP announced that there was not enough evidence to support charges. Cadman died in July. The following month, Harper stated in a court deposition that any such million-dollar offer would have to be authorized by him, and that he did not issue any such authorization. There is currently an ongoing legal battle between the Liberals and the Conservatives over the matter.
On September 24, while campaigning in Surrey North, Stephen Harper's campaign team barred reporters from talking with the local Conservative candidate, Dona Cadman, who is Chuck Cadman's widow. The campaign team called in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), and ordered them to "Keep out" while Cadman was taken away by staff. Harper spokesman Kory Teneycke later stated that he had not seen the incident, but the local candidates did not need to be interviewed, that "Local candidates' priority is campaigning in their local ridings, and not talking to the national media", and that it should be enough that they hold daily news conferences with the party's most prominent members.
The incident has reminded people of Conservative tactics during the 2006 election, where attempts by the media to speak with local candidates were stopped by campaign personnel, especially the Harold Albrecht incident, where campaign officials forced Albrecht to stay in a restaurant kitchen when journalists attempted to interview him.
The Conservatives chose former U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation agent Bruce Koenig to analyze a tape of reporter Tom Zytaruk interviewing Harper on the Cadman bribe attempt. The tape was a key piece of evidence in the ongoing legal battle. On October 10, Koenig announced that the tape had not been altered in any way, contrary to the claims by Stephen Harper that it had been altered.
Canadian involvement in Afghanistan
Main article: Canada's role in the invasion of AfghanistanThe ongoing involvement of the Canadian Forces in Afghanistan may also influence voters. Desmond Morton, a political science professor at McGill University suggested that the Conservatives could be blamed for the war because they have extended the mission twice, despite the fact that it was then Liberal Leader Jean Chrétien who was Canada's prime minister when Canada's current military involvement in Afghanistan first started in 2001. Both the Conservatives and Liberals have at various times agreed to extend the mission(s) to at least 2011, so this may result in some Canadians who are strongly against Canada's ongoing involvement, who might have otherwise typically voted either Liberal or Conservative in the past, to take their votes elsewhere in 2008.
Cities and infrastructure
Toronto Mayor David Miller has spoken out that the parties need to focus more on cities and their infrastructure, stating that 8 out of 10 Canadians live in cities, and that so far only the Green party has revealed a platform on the issue, with a national transit strategy and plans to give cities a permanent revenue source to help fix a growing infrastructure backlog. Miller stated he will not endorse a specific party, but urges people to choose a party that will "help cities thrive". He disagrees with Stephen Harper's opinion that "cities are not of national importance".
On September 18, Stéphane Dion pledged to spend more than $70 billion over the next 10 years to improve Canada's infrastructure if elected, and budget surpluses that exceed a $3-billion contingency fund to infrastructure projects, particularly those with a green focus, calling Canada's cities and towns "the engines of our economy". Stephen Harper immediately lashed out at the spending proposal, saying Dion was "promising money no government could afford" and that the Conservative's infrastructure plans "are modest and affordable within the four-year budget we've published".
On September 23, Montreal and Toronto mayors Gérald Tremblay and David Miller laid out their demands for urban municipalities, describing cities' current financial problems as a national issue, saying that cities have become the country's economic, social and cultural development engines and need appropriate support, and that they need better "fiscal tools" to continue their role as Canada's economic engines or the country will suffer. They listed Homelessness, traffic gridlock, crowded buses and overstretched police departments as just a few of the symptoms, that "These problems are too big and too important to be solved on the backs of property taxpayers" and that "in order to remain competitive, transport goods efficiently and attract new talent, our cities require quality infrastructure, affordable housing and first-rate recreational and cultural facilities". Jean Perrault, president of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and mayor of Sherbrooke, Quebec, has stated that things like the Federal Gas Tax Fund were an important federal commitment, but that more is needed to tackle cities' overwhelming infrastructure needs.
On September 29, Layton announced plans to direct one cent per litre of the gas tax, approximately $400 million a year, into transit projects across the country, and direct $350 million from the sale of carbon permits to big polluters, saying that "the major polluters would be the ones paying to make transit greener, not you and your families", and that "fighting climate change requires investing in transit, and that's what our plan does".
Economy
Polls have suggested that the economy is the major issue going into this election, especially with the resulting high price of gas, along with rising prices of other goods and services, such as food, and the possible impact the 2007–2008 financial crisis may have on Canada. Some experts say that Canada has just narrowly dodged a recession, although the economy is in its worst shape since 1991.
Both Dion and Harper have said that the others' plans will lead Canada into a recession, while Dion also stated that Harper has "mismanaged a once-booming economy into one with growth dropping to among the lowest of the G8 nations".
The Conservatives have stated possible negative consequences that could happen to the economy based on Liberal election promises if they were to be elected. As of September 20, 2008, Liberal election promises have totaled in excess of $80 billion spending over the next decade. In contrast, the cost of programs promised by the Conservatives to date is less than $2 billion annually. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has criticized the Liberal's spending promises, saying they are making "mind-boggling" spending plans that he predicts would send Canada into deficit.
After the rejection of the proposed bailout of the United States financial system and resulting market fluctuation all over the world, including the Toronto Stock Exchange, Jack Layton called for Harper to call a special meeting for federal party leaders to discuss the potential effects of the U.S economic crisis on Canadians, suggestion the afternoon of October 1, since all leaders would be in Ottawa for the first Leaders' Debate that night. A spokesman for Harper later reported that Harper would not call such a meeting, and to save discussion for the Leader's Debate, as " will have an opportunity later this week to debate—not behind closed doors but in front of all Canadians—the issues at stake not for our economy but for our country". Harper later announced that he would ask for the 12 minutes on the economy scheduled for the Leader's Debate to be extended to an hour, citing that the 2007–2008 financial crisis "has deepened since the debate format was finalized", a change which would require agreement from the other parties in the debate to be approved. The NDP released a statement soon after that they supported the move, while public response has been concerned that other topics such as the environment would not end up with enough time to cover the issue. All the leaders supported the idea, and the opening and closing statements were dropped and the allotted time for the economy extended to 30 minutes without affecting the other topics.
During the Leaders' Debates Harper repeatedly came under fire for lack of an economic plan in the current time of crisis and while campaigning, and for his lack of ability to explain how he would deal with the current crisis, merely repeating that Canada was unlikely to face such a crisis as he had made "different choices" than the US while in power without being able to explain what those different choices were, as all of his examples were immediately compared to practices done by the Bush administration, and insisted that Canadians "don't panic". In response to mounting pressure from the public, Harper announced on October 3 that he would reveal his party's platform, including economic matters, on October 7, one week before the election.
Environment
Shortly after the election was called, Harper was criticized for using a four-vehicle motorcade that included a van and SUV to travel the 395 m (1,296 ft) across the street from the door of 24 Sussex Drive to the door of Rideau Hall to dissolve parliament. In return, the Conservatives criticized the Liberal party's decision to use a 29-year-old Boeing 737-200 for campaigning, saying that the older airplane's poor fuel efficiency demonstrates hypocrisy on environmental matters. Daniel Lauzon, a spokesperson for the Liberals, denied their airplane was substantially less efficient than the Conservatives' Airbus A319.
The Tories have been previously criticized for backing out of Canada's commitments under the Kyoto Protocol. Their new plan requires industries to reduce the rate at which they generate greenhouse gases, with a goal of reducing overall emissions by 45 to 65 percent by 2050. The plan has been criticized by groups such as the Sierra Club, who called it "completely inadequate". Criticism has focused on the use of "intensity-based" targets, for which emission reductions are relative to overall production, so overall emissions could potentially increase if production also increases. This is in contrast to a "hard cap" on emissions, for which the overall amount cannot increase. The Conservatives' plan includes a hard cap to begin in 2020 or 2025, while environmental groups have advocated for an immediate hard cap.
The Liberals have developed a "Green Shift" plan, creating a carbon tax that will be coupled with reductions to income tax rates. The proposal was to tax greenhouse gas emissions, starting at $10 (Canadian) per ton of CO2 and reaching $40 (Canadian) per ton within four years. The plan would engage in revenue recycling by matching the tax with reductions in the income tax. Criticism of the Green Shift plan has focused on its economic effects, with the Conservatives predicting it would cause a "big recession". When pressed by reporters to provide evidence of this impact, Harper "wasn't able to cite a study that specifically modelled the impact of the Liberal Green Shift plan", instead citing an older economic model about the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol.
One trucking association claimed the Liberal carbon tax plan could put up to 10,000 jobs in jeopardy in Moncton alone. Environmental activist David Suzuki has come out in support of Dion's plan, saying "To oppose , it's just nonsense. It's certainly the way we got to go" and giving an interview explaining why it is the most effective way to solve the environmental crisis.
The NDP's plan for the environment has focused on emissions trading, claiming their system will decrease greenhouse emissions by 80% by 2050. The plan includes a series of financial incentives to retrofit public transit systems and transition the economy to be "green-collar". The plan would also halt new oil sands development until emissions have been capped. Layton has also criticized the Liberal carbon tax plan, stating it taxes families instead of polluters.
Equalization
Main article: Anything But ConservativeDanny Williams, the Progressive Conservative premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, launched a campaign called Anything But Conservative, primarily targeted at Harper and the federal Conservatives. He opposes a Conservative majority, due in part to Harper's promise during the 2006 election to modify the equalization formula to fully share offshore oil revenues with the province, which Williams says Harper has broken, and what Harper has stated he will do with a majority government. Accordingly, all but one member of the provincial PC caucus supported not voting Conservative in this election.
Leo Power, a veteran of federal politics and the Conservative Party of Canada's campaign co-chair for Newfoundland and Labrador, said raising money and recruiting volunteers has proved difficult, and blames Williams's ABC campaign, saying it has cut deep into the federal election machine that is struggling to compete. Power has also said his party's best hope of winning a seat in the province is in the riding of Avalon with incumbent candidate Fabian Manning. Manning was defeated by Liberal Scott Andrews, while St. John's East and St. John's South—Mount Pearl, which were represented by Conservatives not running for re-election, were won by the NDP and Liberals, respectively, leaving the Conservatives with no representatives in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Leadership
Since before the election was announced, the Conservative party ran attack ads about Dion, saying he was not a capable leader. Dion criticized the Conservatives for running the ads.
On October 9, Stephen Harper called into question the abilities of Liberal leader Dion after footage from the false starts of an interview on CTV Atlantic, and later rebroadcast on Mike Duffy Live, were aired to the public, and criticized Dion's grasp of the English language and the strength of the Liberals' plan for the Canadian economy. In the footage Dion repeatedly failed to understand the conditional perfect construction used by the interviewer in a single repeatedly asked question.
The footage shows interviewer Steve Murphy asking Dion the question: "If you were the Prime Minister now, what would you have done about the economy, and this crisis, that Mr. Harper has not done?". Dion had difficulty in understanding the question, repeatedly asking Murphy to clarify if he meant if Dion was Prime Minister now, next Tuesday on election day, last week, last month, 60 weeks ago, or two and a half years ago. Eventually, after three start overs to the interview, Dion responded with what he would do if elected Prime Minister in the future. CTV initially agreed to restart the interviews and not air the false starts but changed their minds and announced that they felt it was their responsibility to show it. Harper responded to the clips by saying that "When you're running a trillion-and-a-half-dollar economy you don't get a chance to have do-overs, over and over again" and "What this incident actually indicates very clearly is Mr. Dion and the Liberal Party really don't know what they would do on the economy", and when told that the difficulties were in part due to English being Dion's second language, Harper said: "I don't think this is a question of language at all. The question was very clear. It was asked repeatedly".
Mark Dunn, a spokesman for Dion, accused the Tories of making fun of the Liberal leader's hearing issues. Dion responded to Harper's comments, saying Harper had "no class", saying "I did not understand the question", and "Maybe it's because I have a hearing problem, maybe because my second language, but I did not understand the question". Both the Conservatives and the CTV have come under criticism for their handling of the footage, but they have stated they stand by their actions. Duceppe has called Harper's comments a "double standard", saying that many English-speaking politicians have little or no ability to speak French, yet francophones are somehow always expected to be perfect, and that the attack was an attempted "low blow". But Duceppe also took the opportunity to criticise Dion, suggesting he understood the question. "The real question is that I think Dion understood the question. The real problem wasn't the language, it was the substance," Duceppe said, "He had nothing to say". Layton also defended Dion, saying he has "struggled with questions, too".
Former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien has come out criticizing Harper's leadership abilities, noting especially Harper's controlling ways with his cabinet ministers, saying he would have quit if former prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau had treated him that way, that "Mr. Dion was a minister for nine years. And Mr. Harper arrived there with no experience and it shows", that the phrase 'Tory times are bad times', in use since the 1930s, was still true and that "Harper destroyed 50 years of relationships with China", Canada's second biggest trading partner after the US, noting both past Liberal and Progressive Conservative governments sought to maintain its dealings with the key trading partner. Former Prime Minister Paul Martin has also supported Dion's plans and abilities, and many have noted Dion's ability to get both Chrétien and Martin to support him, despite Chrétien and Martin's ongoing feud.
Listeriosis outbreak
Main article: 2008 Canadian listeriosis outbreakThe Minister of Agriculture Gerry Ritz, who has already been criticized by Canada's food scientists for his handling of the 2008 listeriosis outbreak, has also been criticized for making inappropriate comments, further angering the families of those affected. Ritz had joked about the outbreak while he was on a conference call with scientists and political staffers on August 30, saying the political fallout from the outbreak was "like a death by a thousand cuts, or should I say cold cuts". In addition, when he was informed of a listeriosis-related death in Prince Edward Island, he quipped: "Please tell me it's Wayne Easter". Despite calls for Ritz's resignation from the other parties and the public, Stephen Harper has supported Ritz and rebuffed calls for his resignation.
The Public Service Alliance of Canada revealed to the media that the Conservative party plans to cut federal funding to meat inspection programs by $3 million, effectively ending their operation in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and British Columbia.
Speech plagiarism
On September 30, it was revealed by Bob Rae of the Liberal Party that on March 20, 2003, Stephen Harper had plagiarized a speech that called for troops to be deployed to Iraq to assist the US invasion from Australian Prime Minister John Howard, which Howard had delivered two days before, on March 18.
Following Rae's statement, Harper's spokesman Kory Teneycke dismissed the issue as irrelevant, saying "I'm not going to get into a debate about a five-year-old speech that was delivered three Parliaments ago, two elections ago, when the prime minister was the leader of a party that no longer exists".
The Canadian Alliance staff member and former Fraser Institute policy analyst, Owen Lippert, who wrote that speech was working on the current election campaign at Conservative campaign headquarters. On September 30, 2008 he issued a statement and resigned as a result of the incident.
He stated:
Pressed for time, I was overzealous in copying segments of another world leader's speech. Neither my superiors in the Office of the Leader of the Opposition nor the leader of the Opposition was aware that I had done so.
On October 3, there was a second plagiarism allegation from the Liberals, who said that Harper had copied several sentences from a speech by former Ontario premier Mike Harris. Harper denied the allegation, saying "we're talking about a couple of sentences of fairly standard political rhetoric".
On October 6, the Conservatives contended that Dion had also committed plagiarism when, as Minister of the Environment in 2005, he went to a United Nations conference on climate change to deliver a speech which had substantial similarities to the executive summary of a year old UN report. The Liberal party did not respond to the plagiarism allegation.
Controversies
Missing ballot boxes
In Quebec City, several ballot boxes containing votes from advance polls disappeared after the close of advance polling on October 7. The boxes were stored in a closet at the home of a deputy returning officer. Although there was no tampering of the boxes or the votes, three deputy returning officers were fired. Deputy returning officers are the only polling officials allowed to handle ballots during the vote count and the law did allow for them to store the sealed boxes as may be necessary in large remote rural ridings. However the boxes were returned a day late after the riding returning officer ordered their return.
Strategic voting
A number of political leaders and popular websites supported strategic voting in the election, mostly against the Conservative Party. The reasons varied from regional, such as Newfoundland and Labrador premier Danny Williams and his "Anything But Conservative" campaign, to ideological. The popular website VoteForEnvironment.ca, which received over one million page views in the first 12 days of its existence and whose founders were interviewed on CBC and other mainstream media, showed regional breakdowns per riding and offered recommendations based on which candidate was most likely to beat the Conservative candidate. If the Conservative candidate had little chance of winning the riding or was strongly entrenched, the site recommended "vote with your heart". Similarly, a vote swapping organization on Facebook entitled "Anti-Harper Vote Swap Canada" also gained press. The premise of that organization is that eligible voters in different electoral districts may exchange their votes, so that an opponent of a Conservative candidate in each district might have a better chance of being elected in that district. Elections Canada deemed the practice legal.
Green Party leader Elizabeth May sent out mixed signals about strategic voting. On October 12, she recommended that in close ridings, supporters of green policies should consider voting for the NDP or Liberals to defeat the Conservatives, but on the same day she said: "I do not support strategic voting and I have not advised voters to choose any candidate other than Green". In addition, during the final days of the campaign the Liberals attempted to attract strategic NDP and Green votes to stop the Conservatives, and the Conservatives attempted to attract Bloc votes to stop the Liberals.
Voter identification
Some students, homeless, and transient voters were turned away at the polls when they were unable to provide identification showing or otherwise confirming a place of residence. Legislation introduced in 2007 requires all voters to show one or two pieces of identification which confirm the voter's name and address, or to be vouched for by another voter who is able to show such identification.
Region | Turnout (%) |
---|---|
Alberta | 52.9 |
British Columbia | 61.0 |
Manitoba | 56.8 |
New Brunswick | 62.8 |
Newfoundland and Labrador | 48.1 |
Northwest Territories | 48.6 |
Nova Scotia | 60.7 |
Nunavut | 49.4 |
Ontario | 59.1 |
Prince Edward Island | 69.5 |
Saskatchewan | 59.4 |
Quebec | 61.1 |
Yukon | 63.7 |
Voter turnout
See also: Voter turnout in CanadaVoter turnout at 58.8% was the lowest in Canadian election history. All federally funded parties except for the Greens attracted fewer total votes than in 2006; the Greens received nearly 280,000 more votes. The Conservatives lost about 170,000 votes, the Liberals 850,000, the Bloc 170,000 and the NDP 70,000. Some voters were at first turned away because of failure to meet new and stricter proof of address requirements, including 2/3 of those attempting to vote at Dalhousie University, for example. The effect this may have had on voter turnout is unknown.
Judicial recounts
In a federal election, a judicial recount is automatically ordered in a riding where the margin of victory is less than 0.1% (one one-thousandth) of the votes cast. In cases where there is a larger but still narrow margin of victory, an elector can request a judicial recount.
Judicial recounts were ordered in six ridings. In one case, Brossard—La Prairie, the judicial recount overturned the reported victor, giving the seat to the Liberals' Alexandra Mendès instead of the Bloc incumbent Marcel Lussier.
In four other ridings, the recount confirmed the election results, although Liberal Ujjal Dosanjh's margin in Vancouver South was reduced from 33 votes to just 20. This was the slimmest victory of any riding in the entire election, until the results of the Kitchener-Waterloo recount reduced Peter Braid's margin of victory to a mere 17 votes. Dosanjh's Conservative opponent, Wai Young, appealed the recount to the Supreme Court of British Columbia, citing that not all of the ballot boxes were fully recounted. All ballots were eventually counted by November 4, confirming Dosanjh's victory by 20 votes, after the initial partial recount indicated a margin of 22 votes.
In a sixth riding, the recount was cancelled when the elector who had requested it withdrew the request.
Riding | Initial validated results - First and second place | Recount type | Recount date | Judicially certified results - First and second place | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | % | Candidate | Votes | % | |||||
Egmont, PEI | Gail Shea, Con. | 8,122 | 44.0% | Requested | October 23, 2008 | Gail Shea, Con. | 8,110 | 43.9% | ||
Keith Milligan, Lib. | 8,060 | 43.6% | Keith Milligan, Lib. | 8,055 | 43.6% | |||||
Brossard—La Prairie, QC | Marcel Lussier, BQ | 19,202 | 32.6% | Requested | October 24, 2008 | Alexandra Mendès, Lib. | 19,103 | 32.6% | ||
Alexandra Mendès, Lib. | 19,110 | 32.4% | Marcel Lussier, BQ | 19,034 | 32.5% | |||||
Brampton West, ON | Andrew Kania, Lib. | 21,739 | 40.3% | Requested | November 6, 2008 | Andrew Kania, Lib. | 21,746 | 40.3% | ||
Kyle Seeback, Con. | 21,516 | 39.9% | Kyle Seeback, Con. | 21,515 | 39.9% | |||||
Kitchener—Waterloo, ON | Peter Braid, Cons. | 21,851 | 36.1% | Automatic | October 31, 2008 | Peter Braid, Cons. | 21,830 | 36.1% | ||
Andrew Telegdi, Lib. | 21,803 | 36.0% | Andrew Telegdi, Lib. | 21,813 | 36.0% | |||||
Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca, BC | Keith Martin, Lib. | 20,042 | 34.2% | Requested | Judicial recount terminated at the request of the elector who had requested it | |||||
Troy DeSouza, Con. | 19,974 | 34.1% | ||||||||
Vancouver South, BC | Ujjal Dosanjh, Lib. | 16,101 | 38.5% | Automatic | November 4, 2008 | Ujjal Dosanjh, Lib. | 16,110 | 38.5% | ||
Wai Young, Con. | 16,068 | 38.4% | Wai Young, Con. | 16,090 | 38.4% |
Candidates
Conservative
Chris Reid, the Conservative candidate from Toronto Centre, resigned over controversial statements on his blog, which advocated revising Canadian gun control legislation to legalize concealed carriage of handguns. He was replaced by David Gentili.
The Conservatives apologized after an aide to Pontiac candidate Lawrence Cannon told Aboriginal protesters that they were free to meet with Cannon "if you behave and you're sober and there's no problems and if you don't do a sit down and whatever".
Liberal
Liberal candidate Simon Bédard was also asked to resign after he reiterated his 1990 comments, suggesting that lethal force should have been used in the Oka Crisis.
Liberal candidate Lesley Hughes was dropped by the Liberal Party after making controversial comments about the September 11, 2001 attacks. She continued to campaign as an independent, though she appeared as a Liberal on the ballot.
NDP
Andrew McKeever, an NDP candidate in Durham, announced on October 3 that he would resign from the election campaign after it was revealed that he had posted comments on Facebook in which he called one war activist a "fascist bitch" and threatened to beat up another person. Mr. McKeever wrote comments peppered with expletives and calling the operators of a war resister website "Nazis". McKeever was also quoted as saying "I like the part in Schindler's List when the guard starts waxing the prisoners." McKeever's decision to drop out of the race came with just over a week left in the campaign, meaning his name would remain on the ballot. One week before the publication of McKeever's resignation, NDP leader Jack Layton defended McKeever and refused to make him step down.
Julian West, the candidate for the riding of Saanich—Gulf Islands, dropped out of the race after details surfaced about an environmental event he attended 12 years ago when he went skinny-dipping and asked two teenagers to body-paint him. Two other candidates in British Columbia who were proponents of marijuana decriminalization — Dana Larsen and Kirk Tousaw — resigned earlier after videos they had produced for Internet site Pot-TV were released to the media. One of the videos, filmed in 2000, showed Mr. Larsen, former leader of the BC Marijuana Party, preparing to light up a joint before driving a car, after having taken the short-acting hallucinogenic drug DMT earlier in the evening.
Green
John Shavluk, the Green candidate in Newton—North Delta, was removed from the party's slate of candidates on September 4, just before the election call, after it was revealed that he had previously published comments in his blog about the September 11 attacks in 2001, in which he referred to the World Trade Center as "the shoddily built Jewish world bank headquarters". He was replaced by Liz Walker as the Green Party candidate, but remained on the ballot as an independent.
Independent
At an all-candidates debate staged for a high school student audience in Sudbury on September 29, independent candidate David Popescu responded to a question about same-sex marriage by stating that "homosexuals should be executed". His remarks were widely criticized across Canada, and the Greater Sudbury Police Service announced an investigation into whether the comments constituted a crime under Canadian hate speech legislation. He was subsequently investigated by the Toronto Police as well, after a radio interview on October 2 in which he specifically advocated the execution of Egale Canada executive director Helen Kennedy.
Vandalism
Supporters of Ontario Liberal MPs Carolyn Bennett (St. Paul's) and Gerard Kennedy (Parkdale—High Park) who had Liberal signs outside their houses were subject to vandalism during the later hours of October 3, including graffiti, phone and cable lines being cut, and damage to vehicles that included brake cutting. Toronto police reported over 30 incidents of vandalism as of October 6. Some of the victims did not realize their brakes had been cut until they were in traffic, and there was at least one near-accident. Liberal Senator Jerry Grafstein was one of the residents who reported vandalism to his car.
Vandalism was also reported at the campaign offices of Trinity—Spadina Liberal candidate Christine Innes and Beaches—East York New Democratic Party candidate Marilyn Churley, as well as in Niagara Falls.
Legality of the election
After the election was called, Democracy Watch, an Ottawa-based advocacy group, filed a legal suit claiming that the election call was illegal because it violated the 2007 amendments to the Canada Elections Act. These amendments, introduced by the Harper government, set fixed dates for elections, and fulfilled a 2006 promise made by Harper to end the Prime Minister's ability to call snap elections.
On September 17, 2009, the Federal Court of Canada ruled that the election was not unfair, and therefore not illegal. Democracy Watch's appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal was also dismissed, and the Supreme Court denied leave to hear a further appeal.
Target seats
The following is a list of ridings which had narrowly been lost by the indicated party in the 2006 election. For instance, under the Liberal column are the 15 seats in which they came closest to winning but did not. Listed is the name of the riding, followed by the party which was victorious (in parentheses) and the margin, in terms of percentage of the vote, by which the party lost.
These ridings were targeted by the specified party because the party had lost them by a very slim margin in the 2006 election.
Up to 15 are shown, with a maximum margin of victory of 15%.
* Indicates incumbent not running again. To clarify further; this is a list of federal election winners with their party in parentheses, and their margin as a percentage of the vote over the party whose list the seat is on (not the same as the margin of victory if the party potentially "targeting" the seat in that list did not finish second in the previous election). "Won" means that the targeting party won the seat from the incumbent party. "Held" means the incumbent party held the seat.
Conservative | Liberal |
---|---|
|
|
Bloc Québécois | New Democratic |
|
|
† Won by the Conservatives in an intervening by-election with more than a 15% margin over the Liberals. |
- The Green Party of Canada did not come within 15% of winning any riding in the 2006 election, but came 9.0% short of winning London North Centre, ON (Lib) in a November 2006 by-election.
Targeted Cabinet ministers
The following Cabinet ministers were elected by a margin of less than 10% in 2006:
- Tony Clement, Health and Federal Economic Initiative for Northern Ontario: 0.1% over Lib in Parry Sound-Muskoka, ON
- Lawrence Cannon, Transport, Infrastructure and Communities: 5.0% over BQ in Pontiac, QC
- Jim Flaherty, Finance: 5.7% over Lib in Whitby—Oshawa, ON
- Rob Nicholson, Justice: 5.9% over Lib in Niagara Falls, ON
- Peter MacKay, Defence and Atlantic Opportunities: 7.8% over NDP in Central Nova, NS
- John Baird, Environment: 9.0% over Lib in Ottawa West—Nepean, ON
Potential fall of government
Main article: 2008–2009 Canadian parliamentary disputeOn December 1, 2008, as the result of opposition dissatisfaction with the government's economic update (which failed to include stimulus measures to help the Canadian economy contend with the global crisis and included a 'poison pill' regarding the cessation of public party financing), the leaders of the Liberal Party, New Democratic Party, and Bloc Québécois announced they had reached an agreement to approach the Governor General for the purpose of forming a coalition government. Combined, the three opposition parties constitute a majority of seats in the House of Commons. Parliament was due to vote on a no-confidence motion on December 8; if successful, the Liberals and NDP would have formally asked the Governor General to form a coalition minority government for 30 months, while the BQ pledged to support for at least 18 months. Liberal leader Stéphane Dion would have become prime minister until the selection of his successor at the Liberal leadership convention in May 2009, and a coalition cabinet would have comprised 18 Liberal (including a finance minister) and 6 NDP ministers. Governor General Michaëlle Jean had cut short a state visit to Europe "in light of the current political situation in Canada". On December 4, 2008, Jean granted Harper's request to prorogue Parliament until January 26, 2009, thereby staving off the prospect of an imminent change in government. Dion stood down as Liberal leader on December 10 and was replaced by interim leader Michael Ignatieff, who would later be elected unopposed as permanent leader. Ignatieff soon ended the coalition agreement with the other two parties, motivated largely in part by Harper's publicly indicating that he would advise Jean to hold a new election (which, under the precedent set by the King–Byng affair, she would have been obligated to do) rather than recommending that Ignatieff be allowed to form a minority government should the government lose a confidence vote, and polling indicating that any such election would almost certainly result in the Conservatives winning a strong majority.
Opinion polls
Main article: Opinion polling for the 2008 Canadian federal electionOpinion polling for Canadian federal elections |
---|
2004 |
Opinion polls |
2006 |
Opinion polls |
2008 |
Opinion polls |
2011 |
Opinion polls • By constituency |
2015 |
Opinion polls • By constituency |
Endorsements
Further information: Newspaper endorsements in the Canadian federal election, 2008Candidates by party
- Bloc Québécois candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election
- Christian Heritage Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election
- Conservative Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election
- Green Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election
- Liberal Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election
- New Democratic Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election
Results
Main articles: Results of the 2008 Canadian federal election and Results of the 2008 Canadian federal election by ridingParty | Leader | Candidates | Votes | Seats | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | ± | % | Change (pp) | 2006 | 2008 | ± | G | L | ||||||
Conservative | Stephen Harper | 307 | 5,209,069 | 165,002 | 37.65 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 124 | 143 / 308 | 19 | 25 | 6 | ||
Liberal | Stéphane Dion | 307 | 3,633,185 | 846,230 | 26.26 | -3.97 | 103 | 77 / 308 | 26 | 5 | 31 | |||
New Democratic | Jack Layton | 308 | 2,515,288 | 74,309 | 18.18 | 0.70 | 0.7 | 29 | 37 / 308 | 8 | 11 | 3 | ||
Bloc Québécois | Gilles Duceppe | 75 | 1,379,991 | 173,210 | 9.98 | -0.51 | 51 | 49 / 308 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||
Green | Elizabeth May | 303 | 937,613 | 273,545 | 6.78 | 2.30 | 2.3 | |||||||
Independent | 71 | 94,844 | 12,984 | 0.69 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 1 | 2 / 308 | 1 | 1 | – | |||
Christian Heritage | Ron Gray | 59 | 26,475 | 1,677 | 0.19 | – | ||||||||
Marxist–Leninist | Anna Di Carlo | 59 | 8,565 | 415 | 0.06 | – | ||||||||
Libertarian | Dennis Young | 26 | 7,300 | 4,298 | 0.05 | 0.03 | ||||||||
Progressive Canadian | Sinclair Stevens | 10 | 5,860 | 8,291 | 0.04 | -0.05 | ||||||||
Communist | Miguel Figueroa | 24 | 3,572 | 550 | 0.03 | 0.01 | ||||||||
Canadian Action | Connie Fogal | 20 | 3,455 | 2,647 | 0.02 | -0.02 | ||||||||
Marijuana | Blair Longley | 8 | 2,298 | 6,873 | 0.02 | -0.05 | ||||||||
neorhino.ca | François Gourd | 7 | 2,122 | 2,122 | 0.02 | New | ||||||||
Newfoundland and Labrador First | Tom Hickey | 3 | 1,713 | 1,713 | 0.01 | New | ||||||||
First Peoples National | Barbara Wardlaw | 6 | 1,611 | 410 | 0.01 | – | ||||||||
Animal Alliance | Liz White | 4 | 527 | 455 | – | – | ||||||||
Work Less | Conrad Schmidt | 1 | 425 | 425 | – | New | ||||||||
Western Block | Doug Christie | 1 | 195 | 899 | – | -0.01 | ||||||||
People's Political Power | Roger Poisson | 2 | 186 | 186 | – | New | ||||||||
Total | 1,601 | 13,834,294 | 100.00% | |||||||||||
Rejected ballots | 94,799 | 3,255 | ||||||||||||
Turnout | 13,929,093 | 979,610 | 58.83% | 5.84 | ||||||||||
Registered voters | 23,677,639 | 623,024 |
Synopsis of results
Riding | 2006 | Winning party | Turnout |
Votes | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Share | Margin # |
Margin % |
Con | Lib | NDP | BQ | Green | Ind | Other | Total | ||||||
AB | Calgary Centre | Con | Con | 26,085 | 55.60% | 17,683 | 37.69% | 53.16% | 26,085 | 8,402 | 4,229 | – | 7,778 | 420 | – | 46,914 | ||
AB | Calgary Centre-North | Con | Con | 27,361 | 56.54% | 19,948 | 41.22% | 56.29% | 27,361 | 5,699 | 7,413 | – | 7,392 | – | 529 | 48,394 | ||
AB | Calgary East | Con | Con | 21,311 | 66.47% | 17,543 | 54.72% | 41.79% | 21,311 | 3,255 | 3,768 | – | 3,403 | – | 323 | 32,060 | ||
AB | Calgary Northeast | Con | Con | 18,917 | 51.52% | 11,484 | 31.27% | 44.39% | 18,917 | 7,433 | 3,279 | – | 2,045 | 4,836 | 211 | 36,721 | ||
AB | Calgary—Nose Hill | Con | Con | 35,029 | 69.62% | 28,372 | 56.39% | 53.86% | 35,029 | 6,657 | 3,941 | – | 4,685 | – | – | 50,312 | ||
AB | Calgary Southeast | Con | Con | 41,425 | 73.89% | 35,689 | 63.66% | 57.15% | 41,425 | 4,878 | 4,024 | – | 5,736 | – | – | 56,063 | ||
AB | Calgary Southwest | Con | Con | 38,548 | 72.96% | 33,630 | 63.65% | 58.39% | 38,548 | 4,918 | 4,102 | – | 4,743 | – | 521 | 52,832 | ||
AB | Calgary West | Con | Con | 34,579 | 57.36% | 21,375 | 35.46% | 60.96% | 34,579 | 13,204 | 3,832 | – | 6,722 | 1,790 | 155 | 60,282 | ||
AB | Crowfoot | Con | Con | 39,342 | 82.03% | 35,559 | 74.15% | 54.86% | 39,342 | 1,958 | 3,783 | – | 2,875 | – | – | 47,958 | ||
AB | Edmonton Centre | Con | Con | 22,634 | 49.04% | 9,973 | 21.61% | 51.57% | 22,634 | 12,661 | 6,912 | – | 3,746 | – | 203 | 46,156 | ||
AB | Edmonton East | Con | Con | 21,487 | 51.32% | 8,169 | 19.51% | 45.43% | 21,487 | 4,578 | 13,318 | – | 2,488 | – | – | 41,871 | ||
AB | Edmonton—Leduc | Con | Con | 33,174 | 63.21% | 23,940 | 45.61% | 56.64% | 33,174 | 9,234 | 5,994 | – | 4,081 | – | – | 52,483 | ||
AB | Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont | Con | Con | 25,130 | 60.32% | 17,421 | 41.82% | 52.09% | 25,130 | 7,709 | 6,297 | – | 2,366 | – | 157 | 41,659 | ||
AB | Edmonton—St. Albert | Con | Con | 31,436 | 61.65% | 23,391 | 45.87% | 53.67% | 31,436 | 7,441 | 8,045 | – | 4,072 | – | – | 50,994 | ||
AB | Edmonton—Sherwood Park | Con | Con | 17,628 | 35.84% | 1,668 | 3.39% | 55.09% | 17,628 | 5,575 | 6,339 | – | 3,678 | 15,960 | – | 49,180 | ||
AB | Edmonton—Spruce Grove | Con | Con | 36,402 | 68.55% | 29,775 | 56.07% | 53.52% | 36,402 | 6,099 | 6,627 | – | 3,975 | – | – | 53,103 | ||
AB | Edmonton—Strathcona | Con | NDP | 20,103 | 42.58% | 463 | 0.98% | 62.86% | 19,640 | 4,279 | 20,103 | – | 3,040 | – | 147 | 47,209 | ||
AB | Fort McMurray—Athabasca | Con | Con | 17,160 | 67.12% | 13,860 | 54.21% | 35.82% | 17,160 | 2,710 | 3,300 | – | 1,628 | 350 | 419 | 25,567 | ||
AB | Lethbridge | Con | Con | 31,714 | 66.96% | 24,981 | 52.74% | 53.29% | 31,714 | 4,404 | 6,733 | – | 3,420 | – | 1,094 | 47,365 | ||
AB | Macleod | Con | Con | 35,328 | 77.36% | 31,167 | 68.25% | 56.39% | 35,328 | 2,703 | 3,053 | – | 4,161 | – | 422 | 45,667 | ||
AB | Medicine Hat | Con | Con | 26,950 | 70.87% | 22,763 | 59.86% | 46.20% | 26,950 | 2,639 | 4,187 | – | 2,338 | 1,551 | 363 | 38,028 | ||
AB | Peace River | Con | Con | 29,550 | 69.51% | 23,426 | 55.11% | 44.24% | 29,550 | 2,843 | 6,124 | – | 3,303 | – | 689 | 42,509 | ||
AB | Red Deer | Con | Con | 33,226 | 73.24% | 28,186 | 62.13% | 49.87% | 33,226 | 2,863 | 5,040 | – | 4,239 | – | – | 45,368 | ||
AB | Vegreville—Wainwright | Con | Con | 34,493 | 77.09% | 30,263 | 67.64% | 54.03% | 34,493 | 2,345 | 4,230 | – | 3,676 | – | – | 44,744 | ||
AB | Westlock—St. Paul | Con | Con | 27,338 | 72.71% | 23,529 | 62.58% | 51.13% | 27,338 | 3,418 | 3,809 | – | 2,522 | – | 510 | 37,597 | ||
AB | Wetaskiwin | Con | Con | 32,528 | 77.14% | 28,892 | 68.51% | 52.94% | 32,528 | 2,362 | 3,636 | – | 3,395 | – | 249 | 42,170 | ||
AB | Wild Rose | Con | Con | 36,869 | 72.92% | 30,479 | 60.28% | 56.18% | 36,869 | 2,890 | 4,169 | – | 6,390 | – | 246 | 50,564 | ||
AB | Yellowhead | Con | Con | 26,863 | 71.85% | 22,276 | 59.58% | 49.97% | 26,863 | 1,489 | 4,587 | – | 3,437 | – | 1,014 | 37,390 | ||
BC | Abbotsford | Con | Con | 30,853 | 63.32% | 22,920 | 47.04% | 59.50% | 30,853 | 7,933 | 6,444 | – | 3,141 | – | 358 | 48,729 | ||
BC | British Columbia Southern Interior | NDP | NDP | 22,693 | 47.51% | 5,571 | 11.66% | 63.89% | 17,122 | 3,292 | 22,693 | – | 4,573 | – | 80 | 47,760 | ||
BC | Burnaby—Douglas | NDP | NDP | 17,937 | 37.94% | 798 | 1.69% | 57.70% | 17,139 | 9,177 | 17,937 | – | 2,822 | – | 203 | 47,278 | ||
BC | Burnaby—New Westminster | NDP | NDP | 20,145 | 46.50% | 6,995 | 16.15% | 54.35% | 13,150 | 6,681 | 20,145 | – | 3,067 | – | 282 | 43,325 | ||
BC | Cariboo—Prince George | Con | Con | 22,637 | 55.39% | 12,056 | 29.50% | 54.32% | 22,637 | 4,309 | 10,581 | – | 2,614 | 729 | – | 40,870 | ||
BC | Chilliwack—Fraser Canyon | Con | Con | 29,198 | 62.32% | 20,407 | 43.56% | 57.52% | 29,198 | 3,990 | 8,791 | – | 4,107 | – | 766 | 46,852 | ||
BC | Delta—Richmond East | Con | Con | 26,252 | 55.75% | 15,881 | 33.73% | 60.06% | 26,252 | 10,371 | 6,803 | – | 3,663 | – | – | 47,089 | ||
BC | Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca | Lib | Lib | 20,042 | 34.18% | 68 | 0.12% | 64.57% | 19,974 | 20,042 | 13,322 | – | 4,854 | 309 | 130 | 58,631 | ||
BC | Fleetwood—Port Kells | Con | Con | 21,389 | 44.70% | 8,887 | 18.57% | 55.57% | 21,389 | 12,502 | 10,916 | – | 3,045 | – | – | 47,852 | ||
BC | Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo | Con | Con | 25,209 | 46.16% | 5,608 | 10.27% | 62.02% | 25,209 | 5,375 | 19,601 | – | 4,430 | – | – | 54,615 | ||
BC | Kelowna—Lake Country | Con | Con | 31,907 | 55.94% | 23,283 | 40.82% | 58.76% | 31,907 | 8,469 | 8,624 | – | 7,821 | – | 218 | 57,039 | ||
BC | Kootenay—Columbia | Con | Con | 23,402 | 59.59% | 14,510 | 36.95% | 59.76% | 23,402 | 3,044 | 8,892 | – | 3,933 | – | – | 39,271 | ||
BC | Langley | Con | Con | 32,594 | 61.46% | 23,696 | 44.68% | 61.94% | 32,594 | 5,888 | 8,898 | – | 5,059 | – | 594 | 53,033 | ||
BC | Nanaimo—Alberni | Con | Con | 28,930 | 46.68% | 9,250 | 14.93% | 64.77% | 28,930 | 5,578 | 19,680 | – | 7,457 | – | 331 | 61,976 | ||
BC | Nanaimo—Cowichan | NDP | NDP | 27,454 | 45.17% | 4,610 | 7.58% | 63.45% | 22,844 | 4,483 | 27,454 | – | 5,816 | – | 182 | 60,779 | ||
BC | New Westminster—Coquitlam | NDP | NDP | 20,787 | 41.83% | 1,488 | 2.99% | 61.74% | 19,299 | 5,615 | 20,787 | – | 3,574 | – | 417 | 49,692 | ||
BC | Newton—North Delta | Lib | Lib | 16,481 | 36.42% | 2,493 | 5.51% | 62.07% | 13,988 | 16,481 | 11,824 | – | 2,533 | 305 | 121 | 45,252 | ||
BC | North Vancouver | Lib | Con | 24,371 | 42.26% | 2,820 | 4.89% | 66.45% | 24,371 | 21,551 | 5,417 | – | 6,168 | – | 166 | 57,673 | ||
BC | Okanagan—Coquihalla | Con | Con | 28,765 | 58.13% | 20,529 | 41.48% | 59.63% | 28,765 | 5,883 | 8,236 | – | 6,603 | – | – | 49,487 | ||
BC | Okanagan—Shuswap | Con | Con | 28,002 | 51.72% | 17,338 | 32.02% | 60.71% | 28,002 | 5,414 | 10,664 | – | 9,368 | 416 | 278 | 54,142 | ||
BC | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission | Con | Con | 26,512 | 51.81% | 9,618 | 18.80% | 60.24% | 26,512 | 3,394 | 16,894 | – | 3,833 | 238 | 300 | 51,171 | ||
BC | Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam | Con | Con | 25,535 | 54.61% | 15,117 | 32.33% | 58.83% | 25,535 | 6,918 | 10,418 | – | 3,568 | – | 321 | 46,760 | ||
BC | Prince George—Peace River | Con | Con | 22,325 | 63.59% | 16,155 | 46.02% | 48.89% | 22,325 | 2,954 | 6,170 | – | 3,656 | – | – | 35,105 | ||
BC | Richmond | Lib | Con | 21,359 | 49.81% | 8,138 | 18.98% | 51.99% | 21,359 | 13,221 | 5,059 | – | 2,753 | 486 | – | 42,878 | ||
BC | Saanich—Gulf Islands | Con | Con | 27,991 | 43.42% | 2,625 | 4.07% | 70.40% | 27,991 | 25,366 | 3,667 | – | 6,742 | – | 694 | 64,460 | ||
BC | Skeena—Bulkley Valley | NDP | NDP | 17,219 | 49.84% | 4,658 | 13.48% | 56.51% | 12,561 | 1,916 | 17,219 | – | 1,613 | – | 1,237 | 34,546 | ||
BC | South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale | Con | Con | 31,216 | 56.65% | 19,701 | 35.75% | 65.08% | 31,216 | 11,515 | 7,146 | – | 4,951 | – | 273 | 55,101 | ||
BC | Surrey North | NDP | Con | 13,714 | 39.37% | 1,106 | 3.18% | 51.56% | 13,714 | 5,227 | 12,608 | – | 1,925 | 271 | 1,088 | 34,833 | ||
BC | Vancouver Centre | Lib | Lib | 19,506 | 34.51% | 5,318 | 9.41% | 59.37% | 14,188 | 19,506 | 12,047 | – | 10,354 | – | 434 | 56,529 | ||
BC | Vancouver East | NDP | NDP | 22,506 | 54.40% | 15,379 | 37.18% | 53.51% | 6,432 | 7,127 | 22,506 | – | 4,708 | – | 596 | 41,369 | ||
BC | Vancouver Island North | NDP | Con | 25,963 | 45.78% | 2,497 | 4.40% | 64.58% | 25,963 | 2,380 | 23,466 | – | 4,544 | 362 | – | 56,715 | ||
BC | Vancouver Kingsway | Lib | NDP | 15,933 | 35.18% | 2,769 | 6.11% | 56.45% | 12,419 | 13,164 | 15,933 | – | 3,031 | – | 749 | 45,296 | ||
BC | Vancouver Quadra | Lib | Lib | 25,393 | 45.59% | 4,832 | 8.68% | 63.37% | 20,561 | 25,393 | 4,493 | – | 4,916 | – | 333 | 55,696 | ||
BC | Vancouver South | Lib | Lib | 16,110 | 38.49% | 20 | 0.05% | 52.42% | 16,090 | 16,110 | 7,376 | – | 2,065 | – | 211 | 41,852 | ||
BC | Victoria | NDP | NDP | 26,443 | 44.61% | 10,106 | 17.05% | 67.48% | 16,337 | 10,006 | 26,443 | – | 6,252 | – | 237 | 59,275 | ||
BC | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Lib | Con | 26,949 | 44.57% | 10,880 | 17.99% | 63.36% | 26,949 | 16,069 | 8,728 | – | 8,723 | – | – | 60,469 | ||
MB | Brandon—Souris | Con | Con | 19,558 | 57.06% | 13,503 | 39.40% | 55.96% | 19,558 | 2,836 | 6,055 | – | 5,410 | – | 416 | 34,275 | ||
MB | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia | Con | Con | 21,588 | 53.83% | 13,074 | 32.60% | 63.36% | 21,588 | 8,514 | 7,190 | – | 2,632 | – | 180 | 40,104 | ||
MB | Churchill | Lib | NDP | 8,734 | 47.46% | 3,445 | 18.72% | 40.15% | 3,773 | 5,289 | 8,734 | – | 606 | – | – | 18,402 | ||
MB | Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette | Con | Con | 18,132 | 61.36% | 13,218 | 44.73% | 54.71% | 18,132 | 4,128 | 4,914 | – | 1,923 | – | 452 | 29,549 | ||
MB | Elmwood—Transcona | NDP | NDP | 14,355 | 45.77% | 1,579 | 5.03% | 54.04% | 12,776 | 2,079 | 14,355 | – | 1,839 | – | 312 | 31,361 | ||
MB | Kildonan—St. Paul | Con | Con | 19,751 | 53.40% | 7,658 | 20.71% | 58.48% | 19,751 | 3,009 | 12,093 | – | 1,685 | 214 | 233 | 36,985 | ||
MB | Portage—Lisgar | Con | Con | 22,036 | 68.27% | 17,662 | 54.71% | 53.77% | 22,036 | 4,374 | 2,353 | – | 2,606 | – | 911 | 32,280 | ||
MB | Provencher | Con | Con | 23,303 | 64.66% | 18,356 | 50.93% | 58.01% | 23,303 | 4,531 | 4,947 | – | 2,089 | – | 1,170 | 36,040 | ||
MB | Saint Boniface | Lib | Con | 19,440 | 46.32% | 4,712 | 11.23% | 64.32% | 19,440 | 14,728 | 5,502 | – | 2,104 | – | 195 | 41,969 | ||
MB | Selkirk—Interlake | Con | Con | 23,302 | 60.63% | 13,796 | 35.90% | 57.68% | 23,302 | 3,203 | 9,506 | – | 2,126 | – | 295 | 38,432 | ||
MB | Winnipeg Centre | NDP | NDP | 12,285 | 48.92% | 6,848 | 27.27% | 43.25% | 5,437 | 3,922 | 12,285 | – | 2,777 | 361 | 331 | 25,113 | ||
MB | Winnipeg North | NDP | NDP | 14,097 | 62.61% | 9,064 | 40.26% | 42.85% | 5,033 | 2,075 | 14,097 | – | 1,070 | – | 241 | 22,516 | ||
MB | Winnipeg South | Con | Con | 19,954 | 48.84% | 5,733 | 14.03% | 65.63% | 19,954 | 14,221 | 4,673 | – | 1,839 | – | 173 | 40,860 | ||
MB | Winnipeg South Centre | Lib | Lib | 16,438 | 42.27% | 2,335 | 6.00% | 65.68% | 14,103 | 16,438 | 5,490 | – | 2,860 | – | – | 38,891 | ||
NB | Acadie—Bathurst | NDP | NDP | 25,849 | 57.53% | 15,999 | 35.61% | 68.32% | 8,331 | 9,850 | 25,849 | – | 904 | – | – | 44,934 | ||
NB | Beauséjour | Lib | Lib | 20,059 | 46.76% | 7,553 | 17.61% | 69.25% | 12,506 | 20,059 | 7,242 | – | 3,087 | – | – | 42,894 | ||
NB | Fredericton | Lib | Con | 17,962 | 42.53% | 4,643 | 10.99% | 62.13% | 17,962 | 13,319 | 6,490 | – | 4,293 | – | 168 | 42,232 | ||
NB | Fundy Royal | Con | Con | 17,211 | 51.63% | 9,304 | 27.91% | 61.09% | 17,211 | 5,773 | 7,907 | – | 2,443 | – | – | 33,334 | ||
NB | Madawaska—Restigouche | Lib | Lib | 16,266 | 47.40% | 4,864 | 14.17% | 66.77% | 11,402 | 16,266 | 5,361 | – | 1,287 | – | – | 34,316 | ||
NB | Miramichi | Lib | Con | 12,058 | 42.08% | 1,468 | 5.12% | 65.78% | 12,058 | 10,590 | 4,904 | – | 1,105 | – | – | 28,657 | ||
NB | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Lib | Lib | 17,797 | 39.13% | 1,500 | 3.30% | 61.31% | 16,297 | 17,797 | 7,394 | – | 3,998 | – | – | 45,486 | ||
NB | New Brunswick Southwest | Con | Con | 17,474 | 58.32% | 11,611 | 38.75% | 61.17% | 17,474 | 5,863 | 4,958 | – | 1,667 | – | – | 29,962 | ||
NB | Saint John | Lib | Con | 13,782 | 39.55% | 497 | 1.43% | 54.01% | 13,782 | 13,285 | 5,560 | – | 1,888 | – | 330 | 34,845 | ||
NB | Tobique—Mactaquac | Con | Con | 18,071 | 57.40% | 11,298 | 35.88% | 59.73% | 18,071 | 6,773 | 4,830 | – | 1,810 | – | – | 31,484 | ||
NL | Avalon | Con | Lib | 14,866 | 45.28% | 3,324 | 10.13% | 51.80% | 11,542 | 14,866 | 5,707 | – | 714 | – | – | 32,829 | ||
NL | Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor | Lib | Lib | 20,089 | 70.27% | 15,735 | 55.04% | 41.15% | 4,354 | 20,089 | 3,577 | – | 568 | – | – | 28,588 | ||
NL | Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte | Lib | Lib | 17,956 | 68.22% | 13,353 | 50.73% | 44.25% | 2,799 | 17,956 | 4,603 | – | – | – | 964 | 26,322 | ||
NL | Labrador | Lib | Lib | 5,426 | 70.28% | 4,048 | 52.43% | 38.60% | 615 | 5,426 | 1,378 | – | 302 | – | – | 7,721 | ||
NL | Random—Burin—St. George's | Lib | Lib | 12,557 | 53.72% | 6,994 | 29.92% | 41.07% | 4,791 | 12,557 | 5,563 | – | 462 | – | – | 23,373 | ||
NL | St. John's East | Con | NDP | 30,881 | 74.55% | 25,670 | 61.97% | 56.89% | 3,836 | 5,211 | 30,881 | – | 570 | – | 925 | 41,423 | ||
NL | St. John's South—Mount Pearl | Con | Lib | 14,920 | 43.32% | 949 | 2.76% | 51.95% | 4,324 | 14,920 | 13,971 | – | 643 | 179 | 402 | 34,439 | ||
NS | Cape Breton—Canso | Lib | Lib | 17,447 | 48.10% | 8,923 | 24.60% | 63.31% | 8,524 | 17,447 | 7,660 | – | 2,641 | – | – | 36,272 | ||
NS | Central Nova | Con | Con | 18,240 | 46.60% | 5,620 | 14.36% | 67.01% | 18,240 | – | 7,659 | – | 12,620 | – | 623 | 39,142 | ||
NS | Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley | Con | Ind | 27,303 | 69.01% | 22,429 | 56.69% | 57.77% | 3,493 | 3,344 | 4,874 | – | – | 27,853 | – | 39,564 | ||
NS | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | Lib | Lib | 16,016 | 39.49% | 3,223 | 7.95% | 58.73% | 9,109 | 16,016 | 12,793 | – | 2,417 | – | 219 | 40,554 | ||
NS | Halifax | NDP | NDP | 19,252 | 42.69% | 6,794 | 15.06% | 60.67% | 9,295 | 12,458 | 19,252 | – | 3,931 | – | 162 | 45,098 | ||
NS | Halifax West | Lib | Lib | 17,129 | 41.56% | 4,928 | 11.96% | 59.13% | 8,708 | 17,129 | 12,201 | – | 2,920 | – | 257 | 41,215 | ||
NS | Kings—Hants | Lib | Lib | 16,641 | 44.19% | 6,795 | 18.04% | 58.59% | 9,846 | 16,641 | 8,291 | – | 2,353 | – | 528 | 37,659 | ||
NS | Sackville—Eastern Shore | NDP | NDP | 24,279 | 61.42% | 16,081 | 40.68% | 58.52% | 8,198 | 5,018 | 24,279 | – | 2,034 | – | – | 39,529 | ||
NS | South Shore—St. Margaret's | Con | Con | 14,388 | 35.99% | 932 | 2.33% | 60.20% | 14,388 | 9,536 | 13,456 | – | 2,090 | – | 513 | 39,983 | ||
NS | Sydney—Victoria | Lib | Lib | 17,303 | 49.40% | 8,744 | 24.96% | 57.41% | 7,223 | 17,303 | 8,559 | – | 1,941 | – | – | 35,026 | ||
NS | West Nova | Lib | Con | 16,779 | 39.94% | 1,594 | 3.79% | 62.48% | 16,779 | 15,185 | 7,097 | – | 2,106 | 844 | – | 42,011 | ||
ON | Ajax—Pickering | Lib | Lib | 21,675 | 44.53% | 3,204 | 6.58% | 56.71% | 18,471 | 21,675 | 4,422 | – | 3,543 | – | 565 | 48,676 | ||
ON | Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing | Lib | NDP | 15,249 | 45.50% | 4,347 | 12.97% | 56.53% | 5,914 | 10,902 | 15,249 | – | 1,451 | – | – | 33,516 | ||
ON | Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale | Con | Con | 26,297 | 46.50% | 10,975 | 19.41% | 66.70% | 26,297 | 15,322 | 9,632 | – | 5,149 | – | 148 | 56,548 | ||
ON | Barrie | Con | Con | 27,927 | 52.37% | 15,195 | 28.49% | 58.50% | 27,927 | 12,732 | 6,403 | – | 5,921 | – | 344 | 53,327 | ||
ON | Beaches—East York | Lib | Lib | 18,967 | 40.97% | 4,092 | 8.84% | 62.93% | 7,907 | 18,967 | 14,875 | – | 4,389 | – | 155 | 46,293 | ||
ON | Bramalea—Gore—Malton | Lib | Lib | 22,272 | 45.06% | 3,919 | 7.93% | 49.74% | 18,353 | 22,272 | 5,945 | – | 2,551 | – | 309 | 49,430 | ||
ON | Brampton—Springdale | Lib | Lib | 18,577 | 41.04% | 773 | 1.71% | 54.24% | 17,804 | 18,577 | 5,238 | – | 3,516 | – | 135 | 45,270 | ||
ON | Brampton West | Lib | Lib | 21,746 | 40.33% | 231 | 0.43% | 49.72% | 21,515 | 21,746 | 7,334 | – | 3,329 | – | – | 53,924 | ||
ON | Brant | Lib | Con | 22,736 | 41.95% | 4,793 | 8.84% | 58.38% | 22,736 | 17,943 | 9,331 | – | 3,814 | – | 371 | 54,195 | ||
ON | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Con | Con | 22,975 | 47.66% | 9,880 | 20.50% | 61.36% | 22,975 | 6,892 | 4,640 | – | 13,095 | – | 599 | 48,201 | ||
ON | Burlington | Con | Con | 28,614 | 48.60% | 9,037 | 15.35% | 64.99% | 28,614 | 19,577 | 6,597 | – | 4,083 | – | – | 58,871 | ||
ON | Cambridge | Con | Con | 24,895 | 48.63% | 12,918 | 25.23% | 55.92% | 24,895 | 11,977 | 10,044 | – | 4,279 | – | – | 51,195 | ||
ON | Carleton—Mississippi Mills | Con | Con | 39,433 | 57.77% | 24,179 | 35.43% | 69.16% | 39,433 | 15,254 | 6,583 | – | 6,983 | – | – | 68,253 | ||
ON | Chatham-Kent—Essex | Con | Con | 19,960 | 47.92% | 7,833 | 18.81% | 55.86% | 19,960 | 12,127 | 6,850 | – | 2,712 | – | – | 41,649 | ||
ON | Davenport | Lib | Lib | 15,953 | 45.77% | 5,057 | 14.51% | 53.03% | 3,838 | 15,953 | 10,896 | – | 3,655 | 172 | 339 | 34,853 | ||
ON | Don Valley East | Lib | Lib | 18,264 | 48.08% | 6,487 | 17.08% | 53.48% | 11,777 | 18,264 | 5,062 | – | 2,618 | – | 266 | 37,987 | ||
ON | Don Valley West | Lib | Lib | 22,212 | 44.36% | 2,771 | 5.53% | 62.12% | 19,441 | 22,212 | 5,102 | – | 3,155 | – | 162 | 50,072 | ||
ON | Dufferin—Caledon | Con | Con | 23,363 | 53.21% | 14,868 | 33.86% | 56.79% | 23,363 | 8,495 | 4,385 | – | 7,377 | – | 284 | 43,904 | ||
ON | Durham | Con | Con | 28,551 | 54.05% | 16,384 | 31.02% | 60.48% | 28,551 | 12,167 | 5,485 | – | 6,041 | – | 577 | 52,821 | ||
ON | Eglinton—Lawrence | Lib | Lib | 19,133 | 43.99% | 2,060 | 4.74% | 59.75% | 17,073 | 19,133 | 3,663 | – | 3,629 | – | – | 43,498 | ||
ON | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Con | Con | 22,970 | 48.39% | 11,801 | 24.86% | 59.66% | 22,970 | 11,169 | 9,135 | – | 3,241 | 243 | 715 | 47,473 | ||
ON | Essex | Con | Con | 20,608 | 40.00% | 5,635 | 10.94% | 58.22% | 20,608 | 14,973 | 13,703 | – | 2,234 | – | – | 51,518 | ||
ON | Etobicoke Centre | Lib | Lib | 24,537 | 48.85% | 5,698 | 11.34% | 62.48% | 18,839 | 24,537 | 4,164 | – | 2,688 | – | – | 50,228 | ||
ON | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Lib | Lib | 23,536 | 46.13% | 5,743 | 11.26% | 59.31% | 17,793 | 23,536 | 5,950 | – | 3,562 | – | 181 | 51,022 | ||
ON | Etobicoke North | Lib | Lib | 15,244 | 48.58% | 5,808 | 18.51% | 49.60% | 9,436 | 15,244 | 4,940 | – | 1,460 | – | 300 | 31,380 | ||
ON | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Con | Con | 25,659 | 47.30% | 5,662 | 10.44% | 67.29% | 25,659 | 19,997 | 5,678 | – | 2,908 | – | – | 54,242 | ||
ON | Guelph | Lib | Lib | 18,974 | 32.22% | 1,788 | 3.04% | 64.59% | 17,186 | 18,974 | 9,713 | – | 12,454 | 58 | 504 | 58,889 | ||
ON | Haldimand—Norfolk | Con | Con | 19,657 | 40.83% | 4,080 | 8.47% | 60.98% | 19,657 | 15,577 | 5,549 | – | 2,041 | 4,821 | 501 | 48,146 | ||
ON | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock | Con | Con | 30,391 | 55.95% | 19,298 | 35.53% | 60.10% | 30,391 | 11,093 | 7,952 | – | 4,505 | – | 374 | 54,315 | ||
ON | Halton | Con | Con | 32,986 | 47.50% | 7,850 | 11.30% | 60.45% | 32,986 | 25,136 | 6,118 | – | 4,872 | – | 337 | 69,449 | ||
ON | Hamilton Centre | NDP | NDP | 20,010 | 49.25% | 10,959 | 26.97% | 50.36% | 9,051 | 7,164 | 20,010 | – | 3,625 | – | 779 | 40,629 | ||
ON | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | NDP | NDP | 19,919 | 41.28% | 6,464 | 13.40% | 56.59% | 11,556 | 13,455 | 19,919 | – | 2,142 | 323 | 853 | 48,248 | ||
ON | Hamilton Mountain | NDP | NDP | 22,796 | 43.65% | 6,786 | 12.99% | 59.26% | 16,010 | 10,531 | 22,796 | – | 2,884 | – | – | 52,221 | ||
ON | Huron—Bruce | Lib | Con | 22,182 | 44.77% | 5,846 | 11.80% | 64.59% | 22,182 | 16,336 | 7,426 | – | 2,617 | 242 | 747 | 49,550 | ||
ON | Kenora | Lib | Con | 9,395 | 40.46% | 2,051 | 8.83% | 54.48% | 9,395 | 7,344 | 5,394 | – | 1,087 | – | – | 23,220 | ||
ON | Kingston and the Islands | Lib | Lib | 22,734 | 39.15% | 3,839 | 6.61% | 60.10% | 18,895 | 22,734 | 10,158 | – | 6,282 | – | – | 58,069 | ||
ON | Kitchener Centre | Lib | Con | 16,480 | 36.70% | 339 | 0.75% | 57.03% | 16,480 | 16,141 | 8,122 | – | 3,823 | 215 | 127 | 44,908 | ||
ON | Kitchener—Conestoga | Con | Con | 23,525 | 49.32% | 11,649 | 24.42% | 56.52% | 23,525 | 11,876 | 7,173 | – | 5,124 | – | – | 47,698 | ||
ON | Kitchener—Waterloo | Lib | Con | 21,830 | 36.06% | 17 | 0.03% | 62.31% | 21,830 | 21,813 | 8,915 | – | 7,326 | 107 | 543 | 60,534 | ||
ON | Lambton—Kent—Middlesex | Con | Con | 24,516 | 51.28% | 12,704 | 26.58% | 61.10% | 24,516 | 11,812 | 7,427 | – | 3,386 | – | 663 | 47,804 | ||
ON | Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington | Con | Con | 30,272 | 55.88% | 18,463 | 34.08% | 61.04% | 30,272 | 11,809 | 7,112 | – | 4,629 | – | 347 | 54,169 | ||
ON | Leeds—Grenville | Con | Con | 27,473 | 58.44% | 19,398 | 41.27% | 62.86% | 27,473 | 8,075 | 6,511 | – | 4,522 | – | 426 | 47,007 | ||
ON | London—Fanshawe | NDP | NDP | 17,672 | 43.06% | 5,013 | 12.22% | 55.11% | 12,659 | 7,774 | 17,672 | – | 2,656 | – | 276 | 41,037 | ||
ON | London North Centre | Lib | Lib | 21,018 | 39.13% | 3,306 | 6.15% | 56.97% | 17,712 | 21,018 | 9,387 | – | 5,603 | – | – | 53,720 | ||
ON | London West | Lib | Con | 22,556 | 39.09% | 2,121 | 3.68% | 63.14% | 22,556 | 20,435 | 8,409 | – | 5,630 | – | 667 | 57,697 | ||
ON | Markham—Unionville | Lib | Lib | 25,296 | 55.02% | 11,441 | 24.88% | 52.01% | 13,855 | 25,296 | 4,682 | – | 1,921 | – | 225 | 45,979 | ||
ON | Mississauga—Brampton South | Lib | Lib | 21,220 | 47.69% | 6,556 | 14.73% | 49.39% | 14,664 | 21,220 | 5,268 | – | 2,947 | – | 395 | 44,494 | ||
ON | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Lib | Lib | 20,457 | 50.16% | 7,180 | 17.61% | 49.13% | 13,277 | 20,457 | 4,632 | – | 2,138 | – | 277 | 40,781 | ||
ON | Mississauga—Erindale | Lib | Con | 23,863 | 42.71% | 397 | 0.71% | 56.20% | 23,863 | 23,466 | 4,774 | – | 3,636 | – | 129 | 55,868 | ||
ON | Mississauga South | Lib | Lib | 20,518 | 44.22% | 2,152 | 4.64% | 60.08% | 18,366 | 20,518 | 4,104 | – | 3,407 | – | – | 46,395 | ||
ON | Mississauga—Streetsville | Lib | Lib | 21,710 | 45.76% | 4,725 | 9.96% | 56.13% | 16,985 | 21,710 | 4,710 | – | 3,179 | 857 | – | 47,441 | ||
ON | Nepean—Carleton | Con | Con | 39,921 | 55.84% | 23,178 | 32.42% | 69.39% | 39,921 | 16,743 | 6,946 | – | 7,880 | – | – | 71,490 | ||
ON | Newmarket—Aurora | Lib | Con | 24,873 | 46.70% | 6,623 | 12.43% | 62.07% | 24,873 | 18,250 | 4,548 | – | 4,381 | – | 1,209 | 53,261 | ||
ON | Niagara Falls | Con | Con | 24,016 | 46.70% | 10,149 | 19.74% | 54.60% | 24,016 | 13,867 | 9,186 | – | 4,356 | – | – | 51,425 | ||
ON | Niagara West—Glanbrook | Con | Con | 28,089 | 51.98% | 15,134 | 28.01% | 63.69% | 28,089 | 12,955 | 7,980 | – | 3,897 | – | 1,118 | 54,039 | ||
ON | Nickel Belt | Lib | NDP | 19,021 | 46.54% | 8,273 | 20.24% | 57.75% | 8,869 | 10,748 | 19,021 | – | 2,056 | 112 | 66 | 40,872 | ||
ON | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Lib | Lib | 18,510 | 44.56% | 5,078 | 12.23% | 59.42% | 13,432 | 18,510 | 6,582 | – | 2,808 | – | 204 | 41,536 | ||
ON | Northumberland—Quinte West | Con | Con | 27,615 | 48.71% | 11,406 | 20.12% | 60.75% | 27,615 | 16,209 | 8,230 | – | 4,633 | – | – | 56,687 | ||
ON | Oak Ridges—Markham | Lib | Con | 32,028 | 42.24% | 545 | 0.72% | 55.66% | 32,028 | 31,483 | 7,126 | – | 5,184 | – | – | 75,821 | ||
ON | Oakville | Lib | Con | 26,011 | 46.98% | 5,483 | 9.90% | 66.34% | 26,011 | 20,528 | 4,143 | – | 4,681 | – | – | 55,363 | ||
ON | Oshawa | Con | Con | 19,951 | 41.37% | 3,201 | 6.64% | 55.25% | 19,951 | 7,741 | 16,750 | – | 3,374 | – | 415 | 48,231 | ||
ON | Ottawa Centre | NDP | NDP | 25,399 | 39.74% | 8,766 | 13.71% | 69.11% | 15,065 | 16,633 | 25,399 | – | 6,348 | – | 473 | 63,918 | ||
ON | Ottawa—Orléans | Con | Con | 27,244 | 44.91% | 3,695 | 6.09% | 71.34% | 27,244 | 23,549 | 6,025 | – | 3,845 | – | – | 60,663 | ||
ON | Ottawa South | Lib | Lib | 29,035 | 49.91% | 9,618 | 16.53% | 66.82% | 19,417 | 29,035 | 4,920 | – | 3,939 | – | 864 | 58,175 | ||
ON | Ottawa—Vanier | Lib | Lib | 23,948 | 46.20% | 9,810 | 18.93% | 64.04% | 14,138 | 23,948 | 8,845 | – | 4,447 | 227 | 230 | 51,835 | ||
ON | Ottawa West—Nepean | Con | Con | 25,109 | 44.98% | 4,948 | 8.86% | 66.44% | 25,109 | 20,161 | 6,432 | – | 3,558 | 414 | 150 | 55,824 | ||
ON | Oxford | Con | Con | 23,330 | 52.68% | 14,744 | 33.29% | 59.02% | 23,330 | 8,586 | 7,982 | – | 3,355 | – | 1,036 | 44,289 | ||
ON | Parkdale—High Park | NDP | Lib | 20,705 | 42.98% | 3,373 | 7.00% | 64.60% | 5,992 | 20,705 | 17,332 | – | 3,601 | – | 549 | 48,179 | ||
ON | Parry Sound-Muskoka | Con | Con | 21,831 | 50.19% | 10,960 | 25.19% | 62.71% | 21,831 | 10,871 | 5,355 | – | 5,119 | 325 | – | 43,501 | ||
ON | Perth Wellington | Con | Con | 20,765 | 48.09% | 10,540 | 24.41% | 59.39% | 20,765 | 10,225 | 7,334 | – | 3,874 | – | 982 | 43,180 | ||
ON | Peterborough | Con | Con | 27,630 | 47.40% | 9,213 | 15.81% | 63.32% | 27,630 | 18,417 | 8,115 | – | 4,029 | – | 98 | 58,289 | ||
ON | Pickering—Scarborough East | Lib | Lib | 22,874 | 49.69% | 7,934 | 17.24% | 60.22% | 14,940 | 22,874 | 4,875 | – | 3,023 | – | 321 | 46,033 | ||
ON | Prince Edward—Hastings | Con | Con | 26,061 | 50.19% | 12,013 | 23.14% | 59.06% | 26,061 | 14,048 | 7,156 | – | 4,379 | 276 | – | 51,920 | ||
ON | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Con | Con | 28,908 | 61.10% | 19,171 | 40.52% | 63.15% | 28,908 | 9,737 | 5,175 | – | 3,201 | 293 | – | 47,314 | ||
ON | Richmond Hill | Lib | Lib | 21,488 | 47.00% | 5,170 | 11.31% | 52.05% | 16,318 | 21,488 | 4,526 | – | 3,388 | – | – | 45,720 | ||
ON | St. Catharines | Con | Con | 23,474 | 45.90% | 8,822 | 17.25% | 61.20% | 23,474 | 14,652 | 9,428 | – | 3,477 | – | 113 | 51,144 | ||
ON | St. Paul's | Lib | Lib | 26,286 | 50.61% | 12,338 | 23.76% | 63.98% | 13,948 | 26,286 | 6,666 | – | 4,726 | – | 312 | 51,938 | ||
ON | Sarnia—Lambton | Con | Con | 23,195 | 50.01% | 13,158 | 28.37% | 58.66% | 23,195 | 9,404 | 10,037 | – | 3,201 | – | 545 | 46,382 | ||
ON | Sault Ste. Marie | NDP | NDP | 16,572 | 40.43% | 1,111 | 2.71% | 59.42% | 15,461 | 6,870 | 16,572 | – | 1,774 | – | 316 | 40,993 | ||
ON | Scarborough—Agincourt | Lib | Lib | 22,795 | 56.63% | 10,959 | 27.23% | 54.16% | 11,836 | 22,795 | 3,748 | – | 1,870 | – | – | 40,249 | ||
ON | Scarborough Centre | Lib | Lib | 17,927 | 48.68% | 6,839 | 18.57% | 52.13% | 11,088 | 17,927 | 5,801 | – | 2,011 | – | – | 36,827 | ||
ON | Scarborough-Guildwood | Lib | Lib | 18,098 | 50.17% | 7,217 | 20.01% | 54.02% | 10,881 | 18,098 | 5,183 | – | 1,913 | – | – | 36,075 | ||
ON | Scarborough—Rouge River | Lib | Lib | 23,718 | 58.78% | 14,558 | 36.08% | 47.50% | 9,160 | 23,718 | 5,936 | – | 1,207 | – | 331 | 40,352 | ||
ON | Scarborough Southwest | Lib | Lib | 15,486 | 41.83% | 4,558 | 12.31% | 54.74% | 10,928 | 15,486 | 6,943 | – | 3,514 | 151 | – | 37,022 | ||
ON | Simcoe—Grey | Con | Con | 30,897 | 55.05% | 18,798 | 33.49% | 60.10% | 30,897 | 12,099 | 6,288 | – | 5,685 | – | 1,161 | 56,130 | ||
ON | Simcoe North | Con | Con | 26,328 | 49.66% | 11,658 | 21.99% | 60.10% | 26,328 | 14,670 | 6,202 | – | 5,821 | – | – | 53,021 | ||
ON | Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry | Con | Con | 25,846 | 57.34% | 17,292 | 38.36% | 60.15% | 25,846 | 8,554 | 6,107 | – | 1,880 | 2,581 | 105 | 45,073 | ||
ON | Sudbury | Lib | NDP | 15,094 | 35.15% | 2,125 | 4.95% | 58.11% | 11,073 | 12,969 | 15,094 | – | 3,330 | 80 | 397 | 42,943 | ||
ON | Thornhill | Lib | Con | 26,660 | 49.01% | 5,212 | 9.58% | 56.80% | 26,660 | 21,448 | 3,601 | – | 2,686 | – | – | 54,395 | ||
ON | Thunder Bay—Rainy River | Lib | NDP | 14,478 | 40.32% | 2,889 | 8.05% | 57.05% | 8,466 | 11,589 | 14,478 | – | 1,377 | – | – | 35,910 | ||
ON | Thunder Bay—Superior North | Lib | NDP | 13,187 | 37.03% | 3,104 | 8.72% | 57.37% | 9,556 | 10,083 | 13,187 | – | 2,463 | – | 327 | 35,616 | ||
ON | Timmins-James Bay | NDP | NDP | 17,188 | 56.54% | 10,448 | 34.37% | 51.00% | 5,536 | 6,740 | 17,188 | – | 938 | – | – | 30,402 | ||
ON | Toronto Centre | Lib | Lib | 27,462 | 53.53% | 18,060 | 35.20% | 57.39% | 9,402 | 27,462 | 7,743 | – | 6,081 | 146 | 472 | 51,306 | ||
ON | Toronto—Danforth | NDP | NDP | 20,323 | 44.78% | 6,987 | 15.39% | 60.91% | 5,287 | 13,336 | 20,323 | – | 5,995 | 130 | 316 | 45,387 | ||
ON | Trinity—Spadina | NDP | NDP | 24,454 | 40.84% | 3,484 | 5.82% | 62.21% | 8,249 | 20,970 | 24,454 | – | 5,418 | 296 | 491 | 59,878 | ||
ON | Vaughan | Lib | Lib | 27,773 | 49.18% | 8,383 | 14.84% | 51.92% | 19,390 | 27,773 | 5,442 | – | 3,870 | – | – | 56,475 | ||
ON | Welland | Lib | NDP | 16,842 | 32.91% | 300 | 0.59% | 59.67% | 16,542 | 14,295 | 16,842 | – | 2,816 | 569 | 114 | 51,178 | ||
ON | Wellington—Halton Hills | Con | Con | 29,191 | 57.63% | 17,879 | 35.30% | 63.21% | 29,191 | 11,312 | 4,747 | – | 4,987 | – | 414 | 50,651 | ||
ON | Whitby—Oshawa | Con | Con | 30,704 | 50.99% | 15,244 | 25.32% | 60.91% | 30,704 | 15,460 | 8,584 | – | 5,067 | – | 395 | 60,210 | ||
ON | Willowdale | Lib | Lib | 23,889 | 48.67% | 7,958 | 16.21% | 51.92% | 15,931 | 23,889 | 5,011 | – | 3,130 | 260 | 864 | 49,085 | ||
ON | Windsor—Tecumseh | NDP | NDP | 20,914 | 48.70% | 10,638 | 24.77% | 50.65% | 10,276 | 9,005 | 20,914 | – | 2,749 | – | – | 42,944 | ||
ON | Windsor West | NDP | NDP | 20,791 | 52.51% | 11,837 | 29.89% | 47.33% | 8,954 | 7,357 | 20,791 | – | 2,253 | – | 241 | 39,596 | ||
ON | York Centre | Lib | Lib | 16,164 | 43.46% | 2,032 | 5.46% | 52.31% | 14,132 | 16,164 | 4,503 | – | 2,390 | – | – | 37,189 | ||
ON | York—Simcoe | Con | Con | 27,412 | 56.70% | 18,368 | 37.99% | 56.17% | 27,412 | 9,044 | 5,882 | – | 4,887 | – | 1,120 | 48,345 | ||
ON | York South—Weston | Lib | Lib | 16,071 | 46.60% | 6,430 | 18.64% | 50.35% | 7,021 | 16,071 | 9,641 | – | 1,757 | – | – | 34,490 | ||
ON | York West | Lib | Lib | 16,997 | 59.39% | 11,634 | 40.65% | 48.33% | 4,773 | 16,997 | 5,363 | – | 1,488 | – | – | 28,621 | ||
PE | Cardigan | Lib | Lib | 10,105 | 52.81% | 4,444 | 23.23% | 70.26% | 5,661 | 10,105 | 1,556 | – | 710 | 1,101 | – | 19,133 | ||
PE | Charlottetown | Lib | Lib | 8,893 | 50.06% | 3,189 | 17.95% | 66.10% | 5,704 | 8,893 | 2,187 | – | 858 | – | 124 | 17,766 | ||
PE | Egmont | Lib | Con | 8,110 | 43.93% | 55 | 0.30% | 68.15% | 8,110 | 8,055 | 1,670 | – | 626 | – | – | 18,461 | ||
PE | Malpeque | Lib | Lib | 8,312 | 44.19% | 924 | 4.91% | 71.41% | 7,388 | 8,312 | 1,819 | – | 1,291 | – | – | 18,810 | ||
QC | Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou | BQ | BQ | 10,995 | 39.65% | 2,573 | 9.28% | 49.06% | 8,422 | 5,108 | 2,276 | 10,995 | 928 | – | – | 27,729 | ||
QC | Abitibi—Témiscamingue | BQ | BQ | 20,929 | 47.91% | 11,874 | 27.18% | 55.01% | 8,267 | 9,055 | 4,151 | 20,929 | 976 | 302 | – | 43,680 | ||
QC | Ahuntsic | BQ | BQ | 18,815 | 39.49% | 423 | 0.89% | 65.64% | 4,937 | 18,392 | 4,276 | 18,815 | 1,228 | – | – | 47,648 | ||
QC | Alfred-Pellan | BQ | BQ | 20,686 | 38.83% | 5,092 | 9.56% | 66.05% | 8,662 | 15,594 | 6,406 | 20,686 | 1,665 | 259 | – | 53,272 | ||
QC | Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel | BQ | BQ | 26,455 | 48.10% | 16,471 | 29.95% | 60.86% | 9,584 | 9,984 | 6,819 | 26,455 | 2,055 | – | 98 | 54,995 | ||
QC | Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour | BQ | BQ | 26,821 | 54.67% | 17,917 | 36.52% | 65.45% | 8,904 | 7,987 | 4,010 | 26,821 | 1,334 | – | – | 49,056 | ||
QC | Beauce | Con | Con | 31,883 | 62.41% | 24,740 | 48.43% | 62.38% | 31,883 | 5,270 | 4,352 | 7,143 | 2,436 | – | – | 51,084 | ||
QC | Beauharnois—Salaberry | BQ | BQ | 26,904 | 50.07% | 16,046 | 29.86% | 63.22% | 10,858 | 7,995 | 6,214 | 26,904 | 1,764 | – | – | 53,735 | ||
QC | Beauport—Limoilou | Con | Con | 17,994 | 36.76% | 2,032 | 4.15% | 59.40% | 17,994 | 7,030 | 5,986 | 15,962 | 1,363 | 610 | – | 48,945 | ||
QC | Berthier—Maskinongé | BQ | BQ | 24,945 | 45.83% | 12,867 | 23.64% | 62.75% | 12,078 | 10,035 | 5,684 | 24,945 | 1,691 | – | – | 54,433 | ||
QC | Bourassa | Lib | Lib | 19,869 | 49.79% | 9,724 | 24.37% | 58.32% | 5,405 | 19,869 | 3,188 | 10,145 | 1,166 | – | 130 | 39,903 | ||
QC | Brome—Missisquoi | BQ | BQ | 17,561 | 35.21% | 1,204 | 2.41% | 65.78% | 9,309 | 16,357 | 4,514 | 17,561 | 1,784 | 354 | – | 49,879 | ||
QC | Brossard—La Prairie | BQ | Lib | 19,103 | 32.59% | 69 | 0.12% | 64.57% | 11,062 | 19,103 | 7,452 | 19,034 | 1,816 | – | 157 | 58,624 | ||
QC | Chambly—Borduas | BQ | BQ | 31,773 | 50.08% | 21,124 | 33.30% | 68.41% | 9,564 | 10,649 | 8,998 | 31,773 | 2,460 | – | – | 63,444 | ||
QC | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | Con | Con | 20,566 | 41.15% | 5,964 | 11.93% | 63.66% | 20,566 | 7,039 | 6,542 | 14,602 | 1,231 | – | – | 49,980 | ||
QC | Châteauguay—Saint-Constant | BQ | BQ | 25,086 | 45.58% | 14,982 | 27.22% | 66.36% | 9,827 | 10,104 | 8,261 | 25,086 | 1,755 | – | – | 55,033 | ||
QC | Chicoutimi—Le Fjord | BQ | BQ | 19,737 | 41.31% | 3,057 | 6.40% | 62.25% | 16,680 | 6,425 | 3,742 | 19,737 | 1,193 | – | – | 47,777 | ||
QC | Compton—Stanstead | BQ | BQ | 20,332 | 41.86% | 9,386 | 19.32% | 62.97% | 9,445 | 10,946 | 5,483 | 20,332 | 2,368 | – | – | 48,574 | ||
QC | Drummond | BQ | BQ | 17,613 | 38.79% | 6,123 | 13.49% | 62.21% | 11,490 | 7,697 | 7,460 | 17,613 | 1,144 | – | – | 45,404 | ||
QC | Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine | BQ | BQ | 14,636 | 40.10% | 4,796 | 13.14% | 54.11% | 8,334 | 9,840 | 2,549 | 14,636 | 1,136 | – | – | 36,495 | ||
QC | Gatineau | BQ | BQ | 15,189 | 29.15% | 1,577 | 3.03% | 61.13% | 8,762 | 13,193 | 13,612 | 15,189 | 1,342 | – | – | 52,098 | ||
QC | Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia | BQ | BQ | 11,984 | 37.53% | 616 | 1.93% | 54.38% | 5,771 | 11,368 | 1,497 | 11,984 | 1,139 | 175 | – | 31,934 | ||
QC | Hochelaga | BQ | BQ | 22,720 | 49.73% | 13,278 | 29.07% | 58.24% | 4,201 | 9,442 | 6,600 | 22,720 | 1,946 | – | 774 | 45,683 | ||
QC | Honoré-Mercier | Lib | Lib | 21,544 | 43.67% | 7,673 | 15.55% | 62.16% | 7,549 | 21,544 | 4,986 | 13,871 | 1,380 | – | – | 49,330 | ||
QC | Hull—Aylmer | Lib | Lib | 19,750 | 37.45% | 8,125 | 15.41% | 61.00% | 7,996 | 19,750 | 10,454 | 11,625 | 2,784 | – | 121 | 52,730 | ||
QC | Jeanne-Le Ber | BQ | BQ | 17,144 | 34.91% | 1,303 | 2.65% | 57.66% | 5,494 | 15,841 | 7,708 | 17,144 | 2,345 | 577 | – | 49,109 | ||
QC | Joliette | BQ | BQ | 28,040 | 52.40% | 18,500 | 34.57% | 62.02% | 9,540 | 7,769 | 5,579 | 28,040 | 2,588 | – | – | 53,516 | ||
QC | Jonquière—Alma | Con | Con | 26,639 | 52.48% | 7,604 | 14.98% | 64.79% | 26,639 | 2,616 | 2,475 | 19,035 | – | – | – | 50,765 | ||
QC | La Pointe-de-l'Île | BQ | BQ | 25,976 | 56.09% | 18,573 | 40.10% | 59.46% | 5,179 | 7,403 | 5,975 | 25,976 | 1,340 | – | 438 | 46,311 | ||
QC | Lac-Saint-Louis | Lib | Lib | 23,842 | 46.39% | 11,757 | 22.87% | 64.03% | 12,085 | 23,842 | 8,105 | 2,953 | 4,415 | – | – | 51,400 | ||
QC | LaSalle—Émard | Lib | Lib | 17,226 | 40.60% | 6,842 | 16.13% | 57.82% | 6,802 | 17,226 | 5,622 | 10,384 | 1,579 | 674 | 144 | 42,431 | ||
QC | Laurentides—Labelle | BQ | BQ | 24,956 | 47.08% | 10,813 | 20.40% | 60.40% | 6,914 | 14,143 | 4,896 | 24,956 | 2,094 | – | – | 53,003 | ||
QC | Laurier—Sainte-Marie | BQ | BQ | 24,103 | 50.24% | 15,305 | 31.90% | 61.10% | 2,320 | 8,798 | 8,209 | 24,103 | 3,801 | 93 | 651 | 47,975 | ||
QC | Laval | BQ | BQ | 19,085 | 37.80% | 4,895 | 9.69% | 62.24% | 9,101 | 14,190 | 6,289 | 19,085 | 1,607 | – | 221 | 50,493 | ||
QC | Laval—Les Îles | Lib | Lib | 21,603 | 40.45% | 9,027 | 16.90% | 61.69% | 11,017 | 21,603 | 6,124 | 12,576 | 1,752 | – | 336 | 53,408 | ||
QC | Lévis—Bellechasse | Con | Con | 24,785 | 45.90% | 11,038 | 20.44% | 62.45% | 24,785 | 8,130 | 5,856 | 13,747 | 1,370 | – | 113 | 54,001 | ||
QC | Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher | BQ | BQ | 23,118 | 46.12% | 12,198 | 24.34% | 65.89% | 7,210 | 10,920 | 7,021 | 23,118 | 1,752 | – | 103 | 50,124 | ||
QC | Lotbinière—Chutes-de-la-Chaudière | Con | Con | 24,495 | 47.27% | 11,757 | 22.69% | 66.15% | 24,495 | 6,498 | 6,828 | 12,738 | 1,265 | – | – | 51,824 | ||
QC | Louis-Hébert | Con | BQ | 20,992 | 36.23% | 4,649 | 8.02% | 70.29% | 16,343 | 13,669 | 5,403 | 20,992 | 1,408 | – | 119 | 57,934 | ||
QC | Louis-Saint-Laurent | Con | Con | 23,683 | 47.14% | 10,353 | 20.61% | 62.88% | 23,683 | 6,712 | 5,252 | 13,330 | 1,260 | – | – | 50,237 | ||
QC | Manicouagan | BQ | BQ | 15,272 | 49.29% | 6,898 | 22.26% | 49.20% | 8,374 | 4,737 | 1,491 | 15,272 | 1,112 | – | – | 30,986 | ||
QC | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | BQ | BQ | 25,552 | 45.53% | 11,824 | 21.07% | 67.41% | 7,759 | 13,728 | 6,907 | 25,552 | 2,178 | – | – | 56,124 | ||
QC | Mégantic—L'Érable | Con | Con | 20,697 | 46.70% | 8,414 | 18.99% | 64.42% | 20,697 | 6,185 | 4,191 | 12,283 | 959 | – | – | 44,315 | ||
QC | Montcalm | BQ | BQ | 33,519 | 55.69% | 25,132 | 41.75% | 61.73% | 8,096 | 8,387 | 8,337 | 33,519 | 1,854 | – | – | 60,193 | ||
QC | Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup | BQ | BQ | 20,494 | 46.03% | 6,854 | 15.39% | 57.49% | 13,640 | 6,835 | 2,428 | 20,494 | 978 | – | 147 | 44,522 | ||
QC | Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord | BQ | BQ | 21,068 | 48.88% | 9,279 | 21.53% | 58.35% | 11,789 | 5,769 | 3,332 | 21,068 | 1,147 | – | – | 43,105 | ||
QC | Mount Royal | Lib | Lib | 19,702 | 55.65% | 10,026 | 28.32% | 52.30% | 9,676 | 19,702 | 2,733 | 1,543 | 1,565 | – | 186 | 35,405 | ||
QC | Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine | Lib | Lib | 19,554 | 44.62% | 12,446 | 28.40% | 58.09% | 7,108 | 19,554 | 6,641 | 6,962 | 3,378 | – | 177 | 43,820 | ||
QC | Outremont | Lib | NDP | 14,348 | 39.53% | 2,343 | 6.46% | 56.61% | 3,820 | 12,005 | 14,348 | 4,554 | 1,566 | – | – | 36,293 | ||
QC | Papineau | BQ | Lib | 17,724 | 41.47% | 1,189 | 2.78% | 61.77% | 3,262 | 17,724 | 3,734 | 16,535 | 1,213 | 267 | – | 42,735 | ||
QC | Pierrefonds—Dollard | Lib | Lib | 21,468 | 46.94% | 9,653 | 21.11% | 57.81% | 11,815 | 21,468 | 4,823 | 4,357 | 3,161 | – | 111 | 45,735 | ||
QC | Pontiac | Con | Con | 14,023 | 32.71% | 3,627 | 8.46% | 54.55% | 14,023 | 10,396 | 6,616 | 9,576 | 2,148 | – | 112 | 42,871 | ||
QC | Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier | Ind | Ind | 15,063 | 33.49% | 662 | 1.47% | 60.83% | – | 7,320 | 5,707 | 14,401 | 1,452 | 16,102 | – | 44,982 | ||
QC | Québec | BQ | BQ | 21,064 | 41.76% | 8,121 | 16.10% | 62.68% | 12,943 | 8,845 | 5,933 | 21,064 | 1,650 | – | – | 50,435 | ||
QC | Repentigny | BQ | BQ | 31,007 | 53.05% | 22,154 | 37.91% | 65.90% | 8,168 | 8,751 | 8,853 | 31,007 | 1,666 | – | – | 58,445 | ||
QC | Richmond—Arthabaska | BQ | BQ | 23,913 | 46.02% | 8,833 | 17.00% | 65.57% | 15,080 | 6,599 | 4,509 | 23,913 | 1,337 | 526 | – | 51,964 | ||
QC | Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques | BQ | BQ | 17,652 | 44.69% | 9,715 | 24.59% | 58.73% | 7,216 | 7,937 | 4,084 | 17,652 | 645 | 1,966 | – | 39,500 | ||
QC | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | BQ | BQ | 23,216 | 45.68% | 13,305 | 26.18% | 67.18% | 9,911 | 8,823 | 6,741 | 23,216 | 2,134 | – | – | 50,825 | ||
QC | Rivière-du-Nord | BQ | BQ | 26,588 | 53.57% | 19,401 | 39.09% | 59.26% | 7,170 | 6,755 | 7,187 | 26,588 | 1,656 | 273 | – | 49,629 | ||
QC | Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean | BQ | Con | 16,055 | 43.54% | 1,436 | 3.89% | 58.99% | 16,055 | 3,721 | 1,738 | 14,619 | 737 | – | – | 36,870 | ||
QC | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | BQ | BQ | 27,260 | 52.00% | 17,475 | 33.34% | 64.65% | 3,876 | 9,785 | 8,522 | 27,260 | 2,406 | 83 | 489 | 52,421 | ||
QC | Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert | BQ | BQ | 23,767 | 44.99% | 12,012 | 22.74% | 67.70% | 8,125 | 11,755 | 7,154 | 23,767 | 2,031 | – | – | 52,832 | ||
QC | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot | BQ | BQ | 22,719 | 47.36% | 12,524 | 26.11% | 63.12% | 10,195 | 6,649 | 6,721 | 22,719 | 1,682 | – | – | 47,966 | ||
QC | Saint-Jean | BQ | BQ | 26,506 | 49.61% | 17,076 | 31.96% | 65.47% | 9,281 | 9,430 | 5,529 | 26,506 | 2,160 | 520 | – | 53,426 | ||
QC | Saint-Lambert | BQ | BQ | 16,346 | 37.63% | 3,963 | 9.12% | 59.45% | 6,867 | 12,383 | 6,280 | 16,346 | 1,566 | – | – | 43,442 | ||
QC | Saint-Laurent—Cartierville | Lib | Lib | 25,095 | 61.72% | 18,096 | 44.51% | 53.55% | 6,999 | 25,095 | 3,654 | 4,611 | – | – | 299 | 40,658 | ||
QC | Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel | Lib | Lib | 21,652 | 57.26% | 16,025 | 42.38% | 53.59% | 5,627 | 21,652 | 4,039 | 5,146 | 1,063 | 122 | 165 | 37,814 | ||
QC | Saint-Maurice—Champlain | BQ | BQ | 20,397 | 43.96% | 9,314 | 20.07% | 59.25% | 11,083 | 9,755 | 3,601 | 20,397 | 1,562 | – | – | 46,398 | ||
QC | Shefford | BQ | BQ | 21,650 | 42.82% | 10,840 | 21.44% | 63.14% | 9,927 | 10,810 | 6,323 | 21,650 | 1,848 | – | – | 50,558 | ||
QC | Sherbrooke | BQ | BQ | 25,502 | 50.08% | 15,555 | 30.55% | 62.85% | 8,331 | 9,947 | 6,676 | 25,502 | – | – | 467 | 50,923 | ||
QC | Terrebonne—Blainville | BQ | BQ | 28,303 | 52.35% | 19,366 | 35.82% | 66.00% | 7,551 | 8,937 | 7,278 | 28,303 | 1,714 | 283 | – | 54,066 | ||
QC | Trois-Rivières | BQ | BQ | 22,405 | 45.27% | 10,407 | 21.03% | 64.58% | 11,998 | 9,008 | 4,544 | 22,405 | 1,540 | – | – | 49,495 | ||
QC | Vaudreuil-Soulanges | BQ | BQ | 27,044 | 41.34% | 11,548 | 17.65% | 67.76% | 15,496 | 13,954 | 6,298 | 27,044 | 2,625 | – | – | 65,417 | ||
QC | Verchères—Les Patriotes | BQ | BQ | 27,602 | 50.85% | 18,731 | 34.51% | 71.87% | 7,742 | 8,871 | 8,388 | 27,602 | 1,679 | – | – | 54,282 | ||
QC | Westmount—Ville-Marie | Lib | Lib | 18,041 | 46.47% | 9,137 | 23.53% | 50.65% | 6,139 | 18,041 | 8,904 | 2,818 | 2,733 | 47 | 145 | 38,827 | ||
SK | Battlefords—Lloydminster | Con | Con | 15,621 | 60.11% | 9,049 | 34.82% | 51.11% | 15,621 | 2,140 | 6,572 | – | 1,287 | – | 368 | 25,988 | ||
SK | Blackstrap | Con | Con | 20,747 | 53.95% | 10,871 | 28.27% | 64.57% | 20,747 | 5,509 | 9,876 | – | 2,325 | – | – | 38,457 | ||
SK | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Con | Con | 17,922 | 64.36% | 13,528 | 48.58% | 62.79% | 17,922 | 3,691 | 4,394 | – | 1,840 | – | – | 27,847 | ||
SK | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River | Lib | Con | 8,964 | 46.67% | 3,148 | 16.39% | 44.75% | 8,964 | 5,816 | 3,414 | – | 733 | – | 282 | 19,209 | ||
SK | Palliser | Con | Con | 14,159 | 44.12% | 3,294 | 10.26% | 64.35% | 14,159 | 5,489 | 10,865 | – | 1,580 | – | – | 32,093 | ||
SK | Prince Albert | Con | Con | 16,542 | 57.73% | 8,299 | 28.96% | 55.52% | 16,542 | 2,289 | 8,243 | – | 1,413 | – | 167 | 28,654 | ||
SK | Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre | Con | Con | 16,053 | 51.09% | 7,090 | 22.56% | 63.09% | 16,053 | 4,668 | 8,963 | – | 1,737 | – | – | 31,421 | ||
SK | Regina—Qu'Appelle | Con | Con | 14,068 | 51.85% | 5,369 | 19.79% | 56.61% | 14,068 | 2,809 | 8,699 | – | 1,556 | – | – | 27,132 | ||
SK | Saskatoon—Humboldt | Con | Con | 18,610 | 53.80% | 8,978 | 25.96% | 61.50% | 18,610 | 4,135 | 9,632 | – | 2,211 | – | – | 34,588 | ||
SK | Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar | Con | Con | 12,231 | 45.39% | 262 | 0.97% | 54.82% | 12,231 | 1,188 | 11,969 | – | 1,232 | 138 | 188 | 26,946 | ||
SK | Saskatoon—Wanuskewin | Con | Con | 18,320 | 56.51% | 10,422 | 32.15% | 58.78% | 18,320 | 4,020 | 7,898 | – | 2,182 | – | – | 32,420 | ||
SK | Souris—Moose Mountain | Con | Con | 19,293 | 70.49% | 14,694 | 53.69% | 58.68% | 19,293 | 1,834 | 4,599 | – | 1,643 | – | – | 27,369 | ||
SK | Wascana | Lib | Lib | 17,028 | 46.08% | 4,230 | 11.45% | 64.20% | 12,798 | 17,028 | 5,418 | – | 1,706 | – | – | 36,950 | ||
SK | Yorkton—Melville | Con | Con | 19,824 | 68.03% | 13,748 | 47.18% | 56.86% | 19,824 | 1,578 | 6,076 | – | 1,664 | – | – | 29,142 | ||
Terr | Nunavut | Lib | Con | 2,815 | 34.92% | 466 | 5.78% | 47.35% | 2,815 | 2,349 | 2,228 | – | 669 | – | – | 8,061 | ||
Terr | Western Arctic | NDP | NDP | 5,669 | 41.45% | 523 | 3.82% | 47.71% | 5,146 | 1,858 | 5,669 | – | 752 | – | 252 | 13,677 | ||
Terr | Yukon | Lib | Lib | 6,715 | 45.80% | 1,927 | 13.14% | 63.23% | 4,788 | 6,715 | 1,276 | – | 1,881 | – | – | 14,660 |
- including spoilt ballots
- minor political parties receiving less than 1% of the national popular vote are aggregated under "Other"; independent candidates are aggregated separately
- recount terminated at request of applicant
- Ujjal Dosanjh was previously an NDP member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia, and was Premier of British Columbia until 2001.
- John Loewen was previously a member of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba
- Rodney Weston was previously a member of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick
- Bill Casey, the winning candidate, was previously the Conservative MP
- Greg Kerr was previously a member of the Nova Scotia House of Assembly
- also an open seat
- also an open seat
- Gail Shea was previously a member of the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island.
- Keith Milligan was previously a member of the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island, as well as Premier of Prince Edward Island for a short time in 1996.
- Nancy Charest was previously a member of the National Assembly of Quebec.
- André Arthur, the winning candidate, was the incumbent MP
- Brendan Bell was previously a member of the Northwest Territories Legislature
- = went to a judicial recount
- = Open seat
- = turnout is above national average
- = Incumbent had switched allegiance
- = Previously incumbent in another riding
- = Not incumbent; was previously elected to the House
- = Incumbency arose from by-election gain
- = other incumbents defeated
- = Multiple candidates
Summary analysis
Party in 1st place | Party in 2nd place | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Con | Lib | NDP | BQ | Grn | Ind | |||
Conservative | 78 | 50 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 143 | ||
Liberal | 57 | 13 | 7 | 77 | ||||
New Democratic | 20 | 17 | 37 | |||||
Bloc Québécois | 18 | 28 | 3 | 49 | ||||
Independent | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
Total | 95 | 123 | 67 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 308 |
Parties | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
█ Conservative | 143 | 95 | 56 | 12 | 1 |
█ Liberal | 77 | 123 | 79 | 28 | |
█ Bloc Québécois | 49 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
█ New Democratic | 37 | 67 | 129 | 75 | |
█ Independent | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 26 |
█ Green | 5 | 38 | 185 | 74 | |
█ Christian Heritage | 1 | 47 | |||
█ Progressive Canadian | 1 | 8 | |||
█ Newfoundland and Labrador First | 1 | 1 | |||
█ Libertarian | 19 | ||||
█ Marxist–Leninist | 16 | ||||
█ Communist | 10 | ||||
█ Canadian Action | 7 | ||||
█ Marijuana | 6 | ||||
█ First Peoples National | 4 | ||||
█ Animal Alliance | 1 | ||||
█ neorhino.ca | 1 | ||||
█ Work Less | 1 |
Source | Party | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Con | Lib | NDP | Bloc | Ind | Total | ||
Seats retained | Incumbents returned | 105 | 66 | 24 | 42 | 1 | 238 |
Open seats held | 12 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 26 | ||
Ouster of incumbent changing allegiance | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||
Seats changing hands | Incumbents defeated | 17 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 27 | |
Open seats gained | 6 | 4 | 10 | ||||
Byelection gains held | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
Incumbent changing allegiance | 1 | 1 | |||||
Total | 143 | 77 | 37 | 49 | 2 | 308 |
Significant results among independent and minor party candidates
Those candidates not belonging to a major party, receiving more than 1,000 votes in the election, are listed below:
Results by province
Party name | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS | PE | NL | NU | NT | YT | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Seats: | 22 | 27 | 13 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 143 | |
Vote: | 44.4 | 64.6 | 53.7 | 48.8 | 39.2 | 21.7 | 39.4 | 26.1 | 36.2 | 16.5 | 34.8 | 37.6 | 32.8 | 37.6 | ||
Liberal | Seats: | 5 | - | 1 | 1 | 38 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | - | - | 1 | 77 | |
Vote: | 19.3 | 11.4 | 14.9 | 19.1 | 33.8 | 23.7 | 32.4 | 29.8 | 47.7 | 46.6 | 29.2 | 13.6 | 45.3 | 26.2 | ||
Bloc Québécois | Seats: | 49 | 49 | |||||||||||||
Vote: | 38.1 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||||
New Democratic | Seats: | 9 | 1 | - | 4 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 37 | |
Vote: | 25.0 | 12.7 | 25.6 | 24.0 | 18.2 | 12.2 | 21.9 | 28.9 | 9.8 | 33.9 | 27.6 | 41.5 | 9.0 | 18.2 | ||
Green | Vote: | 9.4 | 8.8 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 8.0 | 3.5 | 6.2 | 8.0 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 8.4 | 5.5 | 13.0 | 6.8 | |
Independent / No affiliation | Seats: | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Vote: | 0.6 | 6.6 | 0.7 | |||||||||||||
Total seats: | 36 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 106 | 75 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 308 |
Seats that changed hands
Incumbent MPs not running for re-election
Conservatives
Liberals
Electoral District | Resigning incumbent | Succeeded by | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NL | Random—Burin—St. George's | Bill Matthews | Judy Foote | ||
PEI | Egmont | Joe McGuire | Gail Shea | ||
NB | Fredericton | Andy Scott | Keith Ashfield | ||
QC | LaSalle—Émard | Paul Martin | Lise Zarac | ||
ON | Brampton West | Colleen Beaumier | Andrew Kania | ||
ON | Etobicoke North | Roy Cullen | Kirsty Duncan | ||
ON | Huron—Bruce | Paul Steckle | Ben Lobb | ||
ON | Newmarket—Aurora | Belinda Stronach | Lois Brown | ||
ON | Nickel Belt | Raymond Bonin | Claude Gravelle | ||
ON | Scarborough Southwest | Tom Wappel | Michelle Simson | ||
NU | Nunavut | Nancy Karetak-Lindell | Leona Aglukkaq |
Bloc Québécois
Electoral District | Resigning incumbent | Succeeded by | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QC | Drummond | Pauline Picard | Roger Pomerleau | ||
QC | Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher | Caroline St-Hilaire | Jean Dorion | ||
QC | Repentigny | Raymond Gravel | Nicolas Dufour | ||
QC | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | Gilles Perron | Luc Desnoyers |
New Democrats
Electoral District | Resigning incumbent | Succeeded by | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NS | Halifax | Alexa McDonough | Megan Leslie | ||
MB | Elmwood—Transcona | Bill Blaikie | Jim Maloway | ||
BC | Surrey North | Penny Priddy | Dona Cadman |
Vacancies upon dissolution
By-elections in progress in four vacant ridings were cancelled when the general election was called.
Electoral District | Previous MP | New MP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QC | Saint-Lambert | Maka Kotto | Josée Beaudin | ||
QC | Westmount—Ville-Marie | Lucienne Robillard | Marc Garneau | ||
ON | Don Valley West | John Godfrey | Rob Oliphant | ||
ON | Guelph | Brenda Chamberlain | Frank Valeriote |
Defeated incumbents
Conservatives
Electoral District | Incumbent | Defeated by | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NL | Avalon | Fabian Manning | Scott Andrews | ||
QC | Louis-Hébert | Luc Harvey | Pascal-Pierre Paillé | ||
ON | Mississauga—Streetsville | Wajid Khan | Bonnie Crombie | ||
AB | Edmonton—Strathcona | Rahim Jaffer | Linda Duncan |
Liberals
New Democrats
Electoral District | Incumbent | Defeated by | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ON | Parkdale—High Park | Peggy Nash | Gerard Kennedy | ||
BC | Vancouver Island North | Catherine Bell | John Duncan |
Bloc Québécois
Electoral District | Incumbent | Defeated by | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QC | Brossard—La Prairie | Marcel Lussier | Alexandra Mendès | ||
QC | Papineau | Vivian Barbot | Justin Trudeau |
Greens
Electoral District | Incumbent | Defeated by | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BC | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Blair Wilson | John Weston |
Independents
Electoral District | Incumbent | Defeated by | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QC | Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques | Louise Thibault | Claude Guimond |
See also
- List of Canadian federal general elections
- List of political parties in Canada
- Federal political financing in Canada
- Voter turnout in Canada
Notes
- The Conservatives chose not to field a candidate in Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, as the incumbent Independent MP André Arthur consistently sided with them in votes in the House.
- The Liberals opted not to field a candidate in Central Nova, so as not to oppose Elizabeth May in her campaign for a Green seat.
- Lesley Hughes of Kildonan—St. Paul was nominated as a Liberal, but lost party support after the nomination deadline and continued to run as an independent; she was listed as a Liberal on the ballot.
- Includes Julian West (Saanich—Gulf Islands) and Andrew McKeever (Durham), who withdrew their candidacies but still appeared on the ballot.
References
- Key Dates for each Parliament Archived March 5, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, Parliament of Canada
- Tories prepped for March campaign, The Globe and Mail, February 15, 2007
- "Harper hints at triggering election". CBC News. August 14, 2008. Retrieved August 18, 2008.
- "Harper calls a 4th federal by-election, sets stage for possible fall general election". CBC News. August 17, 2008. Retrieved August 18, 2008.
- "Public events for September 7, 2008". Office of the Prime Minister. September 5, 2008. Archived from the original on December 10, 2008. Retrieved September 7, 2008.
- ^ "PM talks the talk but doesn't walk to Rideau Hall". CTV News. September 7, 2008. Archived from the original on September 16, 2008. Retrieved September 7, 2008.
- ^ Three letters patent Archived December 26, 2010, at the Wayback Machine dissolving Parliament, setting calling election, and summoning a new Parliament.
- "Proclamation Summoning Parliament to Meet on November 18, 2008". Canada Gazette. November 10, 2008. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
- "An Accord on a Cooperative Government to Address the Present Economic Crisis" (PDF). Liberal Party of Canada, New Democratic Party. December 1, 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 9, 2008. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
- ^ "Liberals, NDP, Bloc sign deal on proposed coalition". CBC News. December 1, 2008. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
- "A Policy Accord to Address the Present Economic Crisis" (PDF). Liberal Party of Canada, New Democratic Party, Bloc Québécois. December 1, 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 17, 2008. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
- ^ "Proclamation Proroguing Parliament to January 26, 2009". Canada Gazette. December 5, 2008. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
- "Layton predicts fall election call after meeting with Harper". CBC News. August 30, 2008.
- ^ Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (September 10, 2008). "Green leader allowed into debates, networks confirm". CBC News. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- "Green leader blames Harper, Layton for being barred from debates". canada.com. Archived from the original on September 16, 2008. Retrieved September 9, 2008.
- "News Release - 2008 Leaders' Debates". CNW group. Retrieved September 9, 2008.
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (September 8, 2008). "Greens can't participate in leaders debates, networks rule". CBC News. Retrieved September 9, 2008.
- ^ Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (September 30, 2008). "More time set aside for economy during leaders' debates". CBC News. Retrieved September 30, 2008.
- ^ Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (October 1, 2008). "Economy to dominate French-language debate". CBC News. Retrieved October 1, 2008.
- ^ Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (October 2, 2008). "Harper targeted on economy, crime in French debate". CBC News. Retrieved October 2, 2008.
- ^ Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (October 3, 2008). "Show us the platform, party leaders dare Harper on economy". CBC News. Retrieved October 3, 2008.
- ^ Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (October 3, 2008). "Barbs fly over economy as leaders return to campaign trail". CBC News. Retrieved October 3, 2008.
- ^ "Layton vows to reverse Harper arts cuts, bolster culture funding". CBC News. September 23, 2008. Archived from the original on September 24, 2008. Retrieved September 23, 2008.
- ^ "Actors condemn Harper's culture cuts". CBC News. September 24, 2008. Archived from the original on September 26, 2008. Retrieved September 24, 2008.
- "Harper offers tax breaks to parents with kids in arts programs". The Canadian Press. September 30, 2008. Archived from the original on October 2, 2008. Retrieved September 30, 2008.
- "No charges to be laid in Cadman Affair: RCMP". CBC News. May 16, 2008. Retrieved July 9, 2008.
- Cornell Catana Reporting Services (September 4, 2008). "Stephen Harper, Sworn: Cross-Examination by Mr. Paliare" (PDF). Macleans.ca. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 10, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
- Tim Naumetz (September 4, 2008). "Harper testifies he authorized offer to Cadman". Globe and Mail. Toronto. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
- ^ "Tories use RCMP to block media from talking to candidate Cadman". CBC News. September 24, 2008. Archived from the original on September 24, 2008. Retrieved September 24, 2008.
- "Audio expert says Cadman tape not altered". CBC News. October 10, 2008. Retrieved October 10, 2008.
- "Deaths in Afghanistan could hurt Tory campaign". CTV News. Archived from the original on September 16, 2008. Retrieved September 8, 2008.
- "Toronto mayor suggests Greens best bet for cities". CBC News. September 17, 2008. Archived from the original on September 19, 2008. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
- ^ "Dion promises $70B infrastructure boost". CBC News. September 18, 2008. Archived from the original on September 19, 2008. Retrieved September 18, 2008.
- "Cities need more power to thrive: mayors". CBC News. September 23, 2008. Archived from the original on December 8, 2008. Retrieved September 23, 2008.
- "Use gas tax to pay for public transit: Layton". CBC News. September 29, 2008. Archived from the original on December 2, 2008. Retrieved September 30, 2008.
- CTV. "CTV News Election 2008". Archived from the original on September 13, 2008. Retrieved September 12, 2008.
- ^ Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (September 20, 2008). "Farming aid pushes Liberal pledges past $80B mark". Retrieved September 20, 2008.
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (September 30, 2008). "PM rebuffs NDP call for federal leaders' meeting on U.S. crisis". CBC News. Retrieved September 30, 2008.
- Kuitenbrouwer, Peter (September 8, 2008). "Fuel use of Liberal campaign jet under attack". The National Post. Retrieved September 12, 2008.
- Flavelle, Christopher (September 12, 2008). "What's the Matter With Canada?". Slate. Retrieved September 12, 2008.
- ^ "Tory bill aimed at cutting greenhouse gases in half by 2050". CBC News. October 9, 2006. Retrieved September 13, 2008.
- ^ "Greens tops, Tories flops in Sierra Club climate-change report card". CBC News. September 5, 2008. Retrieved September 7, 2008.
- Jones, Nicola. "Green issues dominate election: Climate change is high on Canadian agenda." Nature, September 17, 2008
- "Liberal carbon tax threatens national unity, economy: Harper". Canadian Press. September 12, 2008. Archived from the original on September 14, 2008. Retrieved September 12, 2008.
- "Tory's 'recession' threat based on old numbers". Toronto: The Globe and Mail. September 11, 2008. Archived from the original on January 16, 2009. Retrieved October 2, 2008.
- Shipley, David (September 8, 2008). "Atlantic director says Liberal proposal jeopardizes 10,000 Hub City jobs, will cost industry another $500M a year". Canadaeast News Service. Archived from the original on September 13, 2008. Retrieved September 12, 2008.
- "Suzuki slams NDP, Tories, backs Dion's carbon tax". Canadian Press. May 18, 2008. Archived from the original on May 29, 2008. Retrieved September 12, 2008.
- "David Suzuki explains why he thinks a carbon tax is the way to go". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. October 1, 2008. Archived from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved October 2, 2008.
- Brennan, Richard (September 12, 2008). "Layton hypes green strategy". The Toronto Star. Retrieved September 13, 2008.
- Boutet, Chris (September 11, 2008). "Layton lays out NDP's environment platform". The National Post. Retrieved September 13, 2008.
- "Layton calls Liberal carbon tax 'wrong'". Canadian Press. September 11, 2008. Archived from the original on January 15, 2013. Retrieved September 13, 2008.
- The Globe and Mail (September 13, 2008). "Harper: Canada a more conservative country". The Globe and Mail. Toronto. Retrieved October 3, 2008.
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (October 3, 2008). "Tory organizer blames ABC campaign for party's woes". CBC News. Retrieved October 3, 2008.
- "Tories launch attack ads aimed at Dion". CBC News. January 29, 2007.
- Yum, Kenny (October 10, 2008). "Stéphane Dion responds to interview gaffe: It was 'difficult to understand' and Harper has 'no class'". National Post. Retrieved October 12, 2008.
- "Not Stéphane Dion's finest hour - Full Comment". Network.nationalpost.com. Retrieved October 16, 2008.
- ATV (October 9, 2008). "TheStar.com - Federal Election - Tories show video to play up Dion's language difficulties". Thestar.com. Toronto. Retrieved October 16, 2008.
- CBC News (October 9, 2008). "CBC.ca - Canada Votes - Conservatives jump on Dion interview". Cbc.ca. Retrieved October 16, 2008.
- Tu Thanh Ha And Jane Taber And Steven Chase. "https://www.theglobeandmail.com: Liberals slam Tories for 'shamelessly' attacking Dion". Toronto: Theglobeandmail.com. Retrieved October 16, 2008.
{{cite news}}
: External link in
(help)|title=
- ^ Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (October 2008). "Dion strikes back at Harper's criticisms of his leadership". CBC News. Archived from the original on October 13, 2008. Retrieved October 10, 2008.
- ^ Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (October 2008). "Harper's criticism of Dion interview 'double standard': Duceppe". CBC News. Archived from the original on October 14, 2008. Retrieved October 10, 2008.
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (October 10, 2008). "'Tory times are bad times': Chrétien". CBC News. Retrieved October 10, 2008.
- "Food scientists' union joins opposition calls for Ritz's firing". CBC News. September 20, 2008. Archived from the original on September 23, 2008. Retrieved September 20, 2008.
- "Families angry about Ritz's listeriosis jokes". CBC News. September 18, 2008. Retrieved September 19, 2008.
- "Conservatives to pull out of provincial meat inspection programs if elected: union". CBC News. September 19, 2008. Retrieved September 19, 2008.
- ^ "Liberals accuse Harper of plagiarizing speech on Iraq". CBC News. September 30, 2008. Archived from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved September 30, 2008.
- ^ CBC (September 2008). "Harper staffer quits over plagiarized 2003 speech on Iraq". CBC News. Archived from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved October 2, 2008.
- Harper denies latest allegations of speech plagiarism. CBC News. October 4, 2008.
- Whittington, Les (October 8, 2008). "TheStar.com - Tories accuse Dion of plagiarism". Thestar.com. Toronto. Retrieved October 16, 2008.
- CityNews.ca Staff (October 7, 2008). "CityNews: Turnaround: Tories Claim Stéphane Dion Plagiarized Someone Else's Speech". Citynews.ca. Archived from the original on October 11, 2008. Retrieved October 16, 2008.
- Séguin, Rhéal (October 13, 2008). "Missing ballot boxes recovered in Quebec". The Globe and Mail. Toronto. Retrieved October 14, 2008.
- "Elections Canada fires 3 officials over missing ballot boxes". Toronto Star. October 14, 2008. Retrieved October 14, 2008.
- "Workers dismissed after missing ballot boxes found". CTV News. October 13, 2008. Archived from the original on May 5, 2011. Retrieved December 5, 2008.
- Anti-Harper/Tory, pro-environment website slammed with pageviews Archived July 6, 2011, at the Wayback Machine LondonTopic.ca. October 6, 2008.
- Thompson, David (October 9, 2008). "Strategic Voting 2.0". The Tyee. Retrieved October 14, 2008.
- "7,000 ready to swap votes". Toronto Star. October 14, 2008. Retrieved October 14, 2008.
- Tutton, Michael. May says to vote NDP or Liberal in close ridings. The Toronto Star. October 12, 2008.
- Green party says leader not calling for strategic voting to block Tories Archived October 14, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. CBC News. October 12, 2008.
- Dion urges Greens to go red, May muddies waters. The Canadian Press. October 12, 2008. Archived October 17, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
- "New ID rules cause confusion at polls". CBC News. October 14, 2008. Retrieved October 15, 2008.
- Pomfret, R. "Voter Turnout at Federal Elections and Referendums". Elections Canada Online. Elections Canada. Retrieved February 10, 2012.
- "Polls close in Nova Scotia". CBC News. October 14, 2008.
- Elections Canada Announces Results of Judicial Recount in the Electoral District of Vancouver South
- Elections Canada – Election Night Results Archived November 8, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
- "Tory candidate to appeal recount", The Globe and Mail, October 28, 2008.
- Fong, Petti (September 23, 2008). "TheStar.com". Toronto. Retrieved February 2, 2012.
- Curry, Bill (September 18, 2008). "Tories apologize for 'sober' remark to aboriginal protester". Toronto: The Globe and Mail. Retrieved November 28, 2008.
- Ottawa, The (September 12, 2008). "Ottawa Citizen". Canada.com. Archived from the original on November 8, 2012. Retrieved February 2, 2012.
- Gazette, Montreal (September 11, 2008). "Canada.com". Canada.com. Archived from the original on November 8, 2012. Retrieved February 2, 2012.
- Winnipeg Sun
- "National Post". Retrieved October 18, 2008.
- "POT-TV: Weedy Wednesday Smokefest - DMT and Mushrooms". Archived from the original on September 21, 2008. Retrieved October 19, 2008.
- McNair, Adrian. "Elizabeth May and the John Shavluk Story | Unambiguously Ambidextrous". Retrieved April 25, 2013.
- Sudbury police investigate independent candidate over gay comments Archived December 10, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Canwest News Service, October 1, 2008.
- "Sudbury candidate probed after second anti-gay remark", ctv.ca, October 8, 2008.
- More cars damaged as election vandalism spreads in Toronto, CBCnews.ca, October 6, 2008
- Vandals target Toronto Liberals, The Globe and Mail, October 6, 2008
- ^ "Liberal senator's Cadillac damaged", Toronto Star, October 11, 2008.
- Police confirm three reports of brakes damage Archived October 20, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Niagara Falls Review, October 8, 2008.
- Bailey, Sue (September 8, 2009). "Judge to rule if 2008 Harper election call legal". The Star. Toronto. Retrieved April 28, 2010.
- Bailey, Sue (January 20, 2011). "Supreme Court will not weigh in on Harper fixed-election case". The Toronto Star. The Canadian Press. Retrieved April 12, 2011.
- Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River
- "GG agrees to suspend Parliament: Harper". CBC. December 4, 2008. Retrieved December 4, 2008.
- "Dion will bow out early to clear way for successor". CBC News. December 8, 2008. Archived from the original on March 31, 2017. Retrieved April 2, 2014.
- Harris, Kathleen (January 26, 2009). "Clock ticking on coalition's chances". Toronto Sun. Retrieved April 23, 2010.
- Ipsos Reid (December 2008). "Harper Has Crushing Poll Lead On Crisis". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 8, 2008. Retrieved December 5, 2008.
- ^ Report of the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada on the 40th general election of October 14, 2008 (PDF). Ottawa: Elections Canada. 2009. ISBN 978-0-662-06476-3. ISSN 0846-6351.
- ^ "Table 11: Voting results by electoral district". Elections Canada. Retrieved April 21, 2024.
- ^ "Table 12: List of candidates by electoral district and individual results". Elections Canada. Retrieved April 21, 2024.
- "Dion drops candidate over 9/11 remarks". The Toronto Star. September 26, 2008.
- "Both Conservatives, NDP gain in Manitoba". CBC News. October 15, 2008. Retrieved March 15, 2020.
- "Veteran St. John's MP Doyle retiring from politics". CBC News. March 13, 2007.
- ^ Chase, Steven (September 3, 2008). "Emerson won't run, sources say". The Globe and Mail.
- Comuzzi won't run in upcoming election Archived September 14, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Thunder Bay's Source, September 5, 2008
- Pallister to quit politics, Winnipeg Sun, January 10, 2008
- "Sask. MP Batters won't run again, citing depression". CBC News. September 2, 2008.
- "Sask. Tory MP says he won't run again". CBC News. January 9, 2007.
- Tory cabinet minister to step down Archived September 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, CanWest News Service, August 3, 2007
- Alta. MP Art Hanger won't run in next election, CTV News, October 10, 2007
- "Edmonton-St. Albert MP won't run again". CBC News. August 11, 2006.
- Thirteen years long enough for MP Ken Epp Archived March 11, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, Edmonton Journal, August 18, 2006
- Solberg retiring from politics, The Globe and Mail, September 3, 2008
- Longtime Red Deer MP won't pursue sixth term Archived September 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Calgary Herald, February 8, 2008
- Thompson will leave politics Archived December 8, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, Edmonton Journal, June 19, 2007
- MP Betty Hinton Will Not Seek Re-election, bettyhinton.ca, October 10, 2007
- "Time right to retire, Liberal MP Matthews says". CBC News. April 3, 2007.
- "Veteran P.E.I. MP to retire". CBC News. March 7, 2007.
- Veteran Liberal MP Andy Scott to quit politics Archived September 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, CTV News, March 5, 2007
- Liberal MPs to step aside in Montreal, The Globe and Mail, December 13, 2006
- Longtime MP resigns and opens door for new election candidate, The Brampton Guardian, September 5, 2008
- "Etobicoke MP will not run in next election". CBC News. February 21, 2008.
- Veteran MP to retire from politics, The London Free Press, March 7, 2007
- Belinda Stronach to quit politics, Toronto Star, April 11, 2007
- MP Ray Bonin doesn't plan to run again Archived September 17, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Northern Life, November 16, 2006
- "Outspoken Liberal MP Wappel retiring". CBC News. March 23, 2007.
- It's my last term as MP, Nancy Karetak-Lindell says Archived September 27, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, Nunatsiaq News, December 22, 2006
- "Priest MP leaves politics after pressure from Vatican". CBC News. September 3, 2008.
- Alexa McDonough retires from federal politics Archived September 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, CTV News, June 2, 2008
- NDP's Bill Blaikie won't seek re-election Archived September 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, CTV News, March 15, 2007
- NDP's Penny Priddy says she won't run again Archived September 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Vancouver Sun, July 16, 2008
- "Liberals win seat in Quebec following recount", The Globe and Mail, October 24, 2008.
- Only contested seats in Quebec.
Further reading
- Pammett, Jon H; Dornan, Christopher (2009), The Canadian Federal Election of 2008, Dundurn Press, ISBN 9781554884070
External links
- Works related to 2008 Canadian federal election at Wikisource
Projections and predictions
- DemocraticSPACE Seat Projections
- Election Prediction Project
- Trendlines Research Daily chart tracking of average of 11 Riding Projection models
- Paulitics 2008 Election Seat Projection
2008 Canadian federal election | |
---|---|
| |
Bold indicates parties with members elected to the House of Commons. | |