Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitextInline

Revision as of 00:01, 29 April 2015 editJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits →Regarding my non-admin closure at ANI← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 11:30, 17 January 2025 edit undoYapperbot (talk | contribs)Bots85,652 edits Feedback Request Service notification on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment (1/2 this month). You can unsubscribe at WP:FRS.
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px green; background-color:#FFFFF3;font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><center>'''Welcome to my talk page. Please add new messages to the BOTTOM of the page by starting a new section heading - just use the 'New section' tab above. I will respond to new messages ''here'', so please watchlist my page. If I leave YOU a message, I'll watchlist your page and look for a reply there. NOTE: Though active in anti-vandalism here, I am not a ]. '''</center></div>		<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px green; background-color:#FFFFF3;font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><center>'''Welcome to my talk page. Please add new messages to the BOTTOM of the page by starting a new section heading - just use the 'New section' tab above. I will respond to new messages ''here'', so please watchlist my page. If I leave YOU a message, I'll watchlist your page and look for a reply there. NOTE: Though active in anti-vandalism here, I am not a ]. '''</center></div>
	{{Archive box|]. ]. ]. ].}}		{{Archive box|]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ]. ].}}
	== ] for ] ==		== "Corrections on Ijdeebrin" ==
			Hello,
			In my attempt to add some information to the article "Ijdeebrine", you reverted my changes claiming that my citations weren't valid or not enough. I would just like to say that my changes, those which you reverted, I wasn't done with them and these are very well known facts.
	{{tmbox
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 1 September 2010, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].
	}}<!--Template:UpdatedITN--> --Happy September indeed. :) I sent you an email, btw. Oh, and thanks for updating that. Best, ] &#124; ] 19:31, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
	:Happy to help! ] 20:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
			The family that I speak of has many houses across the village considering this a very large family. This family is split after a long process concering ancestry, but the family was reconnected by marriage occuring between 1940 and 1950, that marriage resulting in almost 30-40 new additions to the family by birth and marriage. This family keeps expanding itself across this community making an effort to withstand it.
	==Thanks==
	thanks for your advice/analysis.--] (]) 00:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
	:Well, happy to do what I can. Misplaced Pages is like nowhere else in cyberspace, I find; a very odd and shifting mix of the fair and (sometimes) unfair. In this case, the signs indicated a ] for you and the best thing to do in such a case is to not keep getting madder, but to walk away. Otherwise you get warnings and (horrors!) even blocks. And blocks really do tell a lot about editors, in my opinion. Best wishes, ] 01:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
	::yes it was a terrible situation to be in. So many false accusations being made (when false accusations were also part of my original complaint!). then you get people believing the false accusations too and repeating them, it really is very unpleasant stuff. Anyway I've pointed out the mistakes to one of those making the allegations and they've begrudgingly taken at least some of it onboard. I'm not sure what I've learned, other than people can basically say whatever they want and get away with it just so long as they don't' go totally over the top. I suppose I should maybe have asked someone else to take up my case and examine it rather than making the complaint myself? Anyway, I certainly do agree with you about blocks.--] (]) 02:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
			Please tell me what I should do so that I can add some of the family's contributions and importance in the village.
	== ] for ] ==
			- I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ijdeebrine, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so!
			] (]) 23:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
	{{tmbox
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 3 September 2010, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated ''and'' substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].
	}}<!--Template:UpdatedITN--> --You can just give these to yourself y'know? I template myself quite frequently! ] &#124; ] 02:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
	Really! Ok... it seems unseemly, but I will try to adapt if it is standard practice. Many thanks! ] 02:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
	:Well it's not uncommon that an admin forgets or doesn't do them for one reason or another. I try to make sure any non-regular gets a template, but I think you qualify as a regular now! ;) There's nothing wrong with templating yourself. If anybody were to dishonestly template themselves, they'd only be cheating themselves (and possibly 10 point in the backlog creation cup!). Best, ] &#124; ] 03:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
	::This is good reasoning. I again thank you! ] 03:21, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
			*Your statement that I am "claiming" your sources are inadequate is not correct. I am stating a fact based on established Misplaced Pages policy. As I said in my edit summary, please read and understand ] (reliable sources) and ] (original research) which details sourcing requirements for Misplaced Pages. Also important is ] and ] (notability), of particular importance in building an encyclopedia based on verifiability, covered under ]. Best wishes, ] (]) 00:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
			== The Red Room ==
			Thanks for fixing ]. I didn't notice that the vandalism went back more than one edit! ] (]) 00:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
	==Happy Jusdafax's Day!==
			*It happens to me too. Thanks for your note. Cheers! ] (]) 00:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
	{| style="border: 2px ridge #4682B4; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background-color: #EAF5FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 8px; text-align: center;"
	|]
	|style="padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 10px; font-family: Comic Sans MS, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;"|
	''']''' has been identified as an '''''Awesome Wikipedian''''',<br />
	and therefore, I've officially declared today as ]!<br />
	For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,<br />
	enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Jusdafax!
			== please explain ==
	Peace,<br />]<br />23:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
			!!! I am not a vandal. MOST of what is on the page I have no issue with BUT a government agency CREATED in 1958 did not certify something in 1928!!! (Heath Parasol)
			I'D LIKE TO CREDIT AN INNOVATOR... Mr Heath published at least three different versions of his plans in the 1920s, then he later sold kits of one of those plans but to my mind any "flying thing" built to any of those plans is a Heath. Others, notably Mann, credit Heath in the derivative plans they created.
	<small>A record of your Day will always be kept ].</small>
	|}
			Further NOTHING was certified in the US prior to 1928, only "aircraft" were certified by the CAB 1928-1958 (YOU CAN GOOGLE YOURSELF HERE) and the FAA 1958- (AGAIN GOOGLE "WIKIPEDIA") by legal (FAR 103 -- Guess what! YOU CAN GOOGLE YOU AGAIN!) definition a thing that flies BUT is 254 pounds or less in empty weight is not legally an aircraft.
	For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see ] and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 23:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
	:9 <s>Aug</s> Sep for you, I was a few minutes early!<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 00:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
	::Don't you mean the 9th of September? ;) <font face="Segoe Print">] // ] // ]</font> 00:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
	:::Yep.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 02:02, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
			YOUR ENTRY LISTS THE PARASOL AT 280 pounds with a 105 pound engine, but some INCLUDING MINE were built with 45 pound engines, that brings them under the 254 pound FAR 103 limit. THAT IS ALL THAT I AM TRYING TO SAY. I love the Parasol, I own one, I'd be happy to share and make the entry on the Parasol better -- I AM NOT A VANDAL but the original author has only told part of the story.
	::::Well deserved, an awesome editor. ]] 02:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
	:::::WOW! Many thanks... I had taken a little wiki-break there, and what a wonderful way to log in. Many thanks to Rlevse and the rest of you; I am quite astonished and humbled. ] 17:19, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
	::::::Indeed. Well earned. ] <small>(])</small> 17:26, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
			Feel free to email me at pa25235c@gmail.com
	== Another Techwriter2B sock ==
			PS your pages are not easy to navigate <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	Hi Jusdafax. Here's a writeup on yet another Techwriter2B sock . He's now calling himself ]. ] (]) 01:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
	:I have seconded your writeup request. Happy to assist in any other way needful. Best of luck, and thanks, ] 05:35, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
			How can you delete what I am writing when you don't even know the subject. Why can't I write a biography where you don't know the person. Is there a specific rule? I understand me getting the information on has been a bit messy and probably not the right way but nothing had been published yet and all the information is 100% accurate. Some people need o learn, we don't all do this for a living. please advise. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== RfA Nomination ==
			*First off, please understand I am strictly a volunteer, and have never taken money for my work here, much less doing "this for a living." Nor am I an administrator here. I nominated your published UserPage for deletion because it was being used not for your purposes as a Misplaced Pages editor, but for promotion. Please note that the administrator who reviewed my nomination agreed, and carried out the deletion. I suggest that you use a Draft page in the future, which clearly distinguishes your material to editors and readers as being an article-in-progress. The learning curve here is a bit steep, but with patience, and study of how other editors write new articles, your sourced content will be accepted. Take your time, and you will understand the various requirements that go with creating content. Best wishes. ] (]) 04:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
	Jusdafax, it is with great pleasure I have started an RfA for you here: ]. You can accept or decline the nomination, but I sincerely hope you accept, with all the best luck. Best wishes, ]] 22:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
	::''Tommy, I am extremely flattered and honored.'' I just read your gracious nomination; thank you so very much, really! But, with great regret, I deem it best to decline for now... for a number of reasons that it would be tedious to elaborate on, except to say that I don't believe the time is right for me to request the extra buttons, and I am not sure when that time will come, if ever. Again, my profound thanks, and sincere best wishes to you! ] 05:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
	:::I've gone ahead and deleted that page since you declined the nomination. I do, however, look forward to seeing your name on ] some day. Regards, ] <small>(])</small> 05:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
	::::Sorry to see you decline. I was looking forward to supporting this one enthusiastically. ] (]) 05:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
	:::::Shirik, I had answered here first and then had an edit conflict at the now-deleted Rfa nomination page... and now am laughing at myself, as I had put a fair amount of effort into an attempt at an eloquent declining statement. On further thought, it has worked out well. In any case, I am again quite moved my the good opinions of my well-wishers, and promise that I will give your views further consideration in the coming weeks and months, Shirik, Tommy2010 and MarmadukePercy! ] 05:46, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::Sorry to see you declined. I've seen what having admin privileges is like (on other wikis) and it's really not a big deal, despite a potential (not for you though) trip to hell and back. I think and I'd be willing to bet the community is too- that you'd be a great candidate that's fully qualified. Regards ]] 05:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
			== Speedy deletion declined: ] ==
	== BLP unsourced vs BLP sources and No footnotes ==
			Hello Jusdafax. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a blatant misuse of Misplaced Pages as a webhost. Thank you. ] (]) 08:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
			*This is my personal page, and I am not intending to put anything remotely controversial or unsuitable for this site. Kinda strange that my user page was mistaken as for an actual Misplaced Pages page. The info posted here comes directly from Candy Crush Saga wiki, which I am an administrator here. Right now, I only occasionally contribute on Misplaced Pages, mostly correcting vandalism. ] (]) 02:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
	Hi there, for articles like , you should use {{tl|BLP sources}} and {{tl|No footnotes}} rather than {{tl|BLP unsourced}} as it does have a reference, it just lacks inline citations. Also, if you go to the trouble of posting a message on talk page, can you check for relevant WikiProject banners? If the article isn't in any WikiProjects, the chances of it ever being improved are much less. Thanks. ] (]) 11:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
	:Quite right, and I thank you for taking the time to give me a ]! ] 12:47, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
			::Greetings to you both. I nominated this User page for speedy deletion because I consider it to be, per under ] of ], a "Blatant misuse of Misplaced Pages as a web host" in my view, as the criteria in question describes "Pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Misplaced Pages's goals, where the owner has made few or no edits outside of user pages." The wording on U5 policy is quite direct. Since the User page indeed has very little to do with Misplaced Pages and describes in substantial detail the user's video gaming activities, complete with tables and including a contact email, it seemed worthy of my nomination. My nomination was declined. Obviously I disagree with that call, and will take the decision under advisement. Best wishes. ] (]) 21:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
	== ] ==
			== shilmani ==
	Hi. As you recently commented in the ] regarding the ongoing usage and trial of ], this is to notify you that there is an ''']''' with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. ''']''' on this issue is greatly appreciated. ] (]) 23:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
			i was just testing the shilmani page. moreover it was initial writing.
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0073 -->
			i want to create a page for Rahat Khan Shalmani who was a prominent figure in our district. can you help me please how to create that <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:Is it? I seem to remember observing that the previous poll was of questionable character, and not casting a !vote as a result. Still, thank you for the notice. ] 18:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
	::No worries, this notice was sent to all users by bot ( over 600 ) that commented on the straw poll page even if they did not actually take a position one way or the other, you are of course under no obligations to comment. Best regards ] (]) 18:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
			*Hello. I reverted your edit to the ] article that stated "Naek Amal Khan was elected as a member of provincial assembly in 1990 and 1997 from ANP. he was very noble person" which has several problems. Saying someone is "very noble" is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy per ]. Not including a reference or source to confirm your edit is also a violation of ] and ]. To understand the referencing requirements at Misplaced Pages, I suggest you start at ]. A Google search of Rahat Khan Shalmani doesn't give any useable references that I can find in English, but you may find some in other languages. I hope this helps you understand my revert. Best wishes, ] (]) 21:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
	== Ysgol y Preseli ==
			== Speedy deletion declined: ] ==
	I got a mesasage from you warning me about changes I made to "Ysgol y Preseli". Until I got your message I had never heard of "Ysgol y Preseli" nor had I made any changes to it <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			Hello Jusdafax. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's not in userspace. Should be in mainspace, I'll move it, then tag it for A7. Sorry to be anal about the criteria. Thank you. ]] 10:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
			:The mainspace article has been speedily deleted by another admin now. Thanks. ]] 11:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
			*All good, dont recall seeing a case like this before. Thanks for the note. ] (]) 13:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
	:I see 'Clue Bot' warned you as well, it was a simple deletion of content warning. Hm, back on June 1st, eh? Could someone have had access to your computer then? Since you have like 5 edits total I doubt you are a dedicated vandal. And like you I have never heard of Ysgol y Preseli except when it came up on Huggle, the anti-vandal tool. Well, best wishes to you. It's a mystery we may never solve. ] 05:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
	== Techwriter2B is back ==		== Nick Cody 66 ==
			I am not engaging in sockpuppetry. Mooving Media was shut down by admin because my ID looked corporate. I am just an individual, so i registered under my own name <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	This time he registered Centpacrr’s full real name as his own username and attempted to impersonate Centpacrr. Was quickly blocked by OhNoitsJamie but is now appealing the block. ] (]) 10:31, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
	:Unbelievable. Yeah, I'll take a look, and thanks. ] 01:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC)		:Yes, I just read the report and understand my error. ] (]) 09:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
	::Talk about unbelievable - he's appealed yet again and has even added a header to the talk page essentially threatening libel. ] (]) 06:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
	== Hey, where ya been? ==		== Sockpuppety ==
			Seems your attack on me for adding factual, balanced, impartial information to the article 'Magnus Walker' has fallen on deaf ears. Too bad. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	We're all missing you on IRC... ] (]) 18:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
	:I'll be checking in asap. Personal matters and travel (with ''no computer'') have quite consumed me of late and it has only been the past few days that I have settled back down. Of course, now the World Series starts tonight! 'Till soon, ] 18:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)		:I'd disagree with your assessment, given the fact that several other editors felt as I did about your edits and reverted them also, and you are now banned from editing the article. I goofed, true. Suggest we call it even and move on. ] (]) 10:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
	::Ah, well, see you in a bit. ] (]) 18:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
			== Speedy deletion declined: ] ==
	==It's raining thanks spam!==
			Hello Jusdafax. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Should probably be on a subpage, but it's pretty clearly encylopedic. Thank you. ]] 13:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
	* Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
			:I'd agree about the subpage. It's not a proper User page at all. ] (]) 04:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
	* There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (], ], ], and ]). You can also consider becoming a ]. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for ] yourself!
	* If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks &bull;&nbsp;]&nbsp;(]) 02:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
	:As I said in the Rfa, it was very tough to make a decision. I again thank you for your many good deeds on the project. ] 02:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
			== update on the item "ceva logistics" ==
	== Huggle ==
			Dear Sir/Madame,
	When are you going to use Huggle again? ]] 15:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
			I updated the source link in the text/dialogue message. Also i attached hereto.
	:Miss me? I'm a fairly good Huggler, if I do say so myself. I do feel however that much of the effort is a waste of time due to IP vandals. I speak as someone with over 50,000 edits... Required registration would stop 90% of ''all vandalism'', most of which is done by bored school kids on school computers. This would free up an awful lot of time for editing articles and content creation. I don't rule out doing more Huggling... but at the moment I have been a bit busy in 'real life' and have a limited time to work on Misplaced Pages. But thanks for asking. ] 18:07, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
			www.cevalogistics.com/about-us/our-history
			Would you please have a review?
	::Your welcome, and I hope you will come back to Huggle soon because that's the Jusdafax that I know about because you warned many users. ]] 21:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
			Thanks
	== An apology ==
			Luthyd
	Jusdafax, nine months ago I had committed a judgment of error &mdash; one made in good faith, but an error nonetheless. You had raised the point and I made the mistake of taking it personally and then reacting thus. I would like to apologize for my ludicrously poor behavior, and I would like to express regret for not apologizing to you sooner about it. I hope you do not consider it reflective of my general behavior, which is typically more moderate. ] 01:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
			P.S. My ID is "Luthyd" <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	*Fair enough, Harej, and I salute you. I decided not to bring the issue up when we later met at the Wikimedia Foundation offices in San Francisco when you came through for a visit. I was the old geezer in the cubicle next to Cary Bass. I'm currently a lot less involved in the project than I was at that time, but I may yet go back to deeper involvement, so I appreciate any healing offers I can get. I must admit that I felt the way Cda was dealt with overall was the start of my current disenchantment with Misplaced Pages. Indeed (and to be frank), I pulled back and semi-recently declined a handsome Rfa nomination due to deep concerns around the issues of admin abuse, civility standards, and other wiki-matters that have left a bad taste in my mouth, though my real life time concerns were also a factor... But I take your friendly comment as a good sign. Thanks for reaching out! ] 12:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
			== ArbCom ==
	== ] for ] ==
			You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the ] and the ] may be of use.
	{{tmbox
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 26 November 2010, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].}}
	* Note: Self-templated per HJ Mitchell, above. But it does not feel right or natural to do so. ] 04:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
			Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice -->
	== Thank you! ==
			*Noted, thanks. I will consider this, and may or may not participate. ] (]) 19:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
	Thank you for your support at my RfA last week. I'll do everything I can to live up to your expectations and if you ever need help from a janitor please feel free to drop me a line! ]<sup>]</sup> 13:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
	:Thanks back. May you use your new buttons with a fair but firm touch! Very best wishes, ] 05:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
			== JzG case request declined ==
	== thanks ==
			The case request "JzG" that you are a party to has been declined by the committee after a absolute majority of arbitrators ]. The case request has been removed from ]. A permanent link to the declined case can be accessed ].
	Many thanks for your thoughtful, intelligent, and gracious notes on my talkpage and elsewhere. Best.--] (]) 08:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
	*You are quite welcome. As I note above, I am a very part-time Wikipedian at the present, and some of the reason for that is exemplified by your recent ordeal. I have seen too many like you get what I'd call shabby treatment, while those truly abusive editors I'd consider worthy of extended blocks escape meaningful sanctions, and smirkingly continue to "play the edge" of what they can get away with. It all has had, and continues to have, quite the ] on me, and I assume others of good will, creating an intellectual and spiritual effect not unlike ]. It would seem that, as usual in human affairs, those who ''want'' power are almost always the very people who should ''not'' be given power.
	:My best wishes to you and yours this Holiday Season, ] 09:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
			For the Arbitration Committee, ] <sup>'']'' &#124; '']''</sup> 15:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
	== ITN ==
			== Reverted my edits on Misplaced Pages page Vic Gilliam ==
	The Nigerian settlement part was again removed by someone from the Cheney article. I added the info to ] anyway, I think it is better if we feature this instead so please do not go into an edit war on the Cheney article :D --] (]) 19:00, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
	:Naw, no worries, I've been a big believer in taking it slow for a while now, and haven't been in an edit war in a long time... and have never been blocked. I reverted it back in once, so it's up to other interested parties to debate the issue. Thanks for the update here, our edits crossed when I made an additional comment at ITN. Happy holidays! ] 19:08, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
	{{tmbox
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 18 December 2010, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated ''and'' updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].
	}}<!--Template:ITN credit--> --] (]) 19:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
	*Awww thanks! Though actually, I was trying to update the ] article, as noted above. Anyway, I really appreciate not having to self-template! ] 19:53, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
			Hello,
	== Merry Christmas! ==
			I had made edits to the Misplaced Pages page Vic Gilliam regarding the recent death hoax confirmed by Domo (read more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Domo_(NHK))
	<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:green; border-width:5px">
	<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:fff; border-width:5px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
			So why was my edit reverted, I gave you the link, I hope this can be helpful.
	{{cquote|And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God.|
	|4=(Alma 7:10)}}
			*User blocked. Mr. Gilliam's death is not disputed anywhere I can find. ] (]) 04:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
	<font face="Segoe Print">] ]/]</font> is wishing you a Merry ]! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! <br />
			== request for restoring of the page ==
	<i>Spread the cheer by adding <nowiki>{{subst:User:TTTSNB/Merry_Christmas}}</nowiki> to their talk page with a friendly message.</i>
			Hi Jusdafax,,
	</div>
			I sincerely seek your help regarding this matter.
	</div>
			I was trying to prepare a page for this 75+ year old gentleman P V Raghunathan who I feel merits inclusion on the wiki pages. It is not for publicity or for any other commercial reasons. In fact, he does not crave for any limelight. He has recently written his Autobiographical book 'My Many Trysts with God' which has been published by a well-known publisher of Chennai of Tamil Nadu State of India and has garnered excellent reviews on Amazon Indian site as well as global site. It is his maiden published work yet if you see the quality of his work I am sure you will be convinced that it is no less than any autobiography (both in contents as well as expression) written by anyone and published so far.
	Many Thanks! Have replied on your page... ] 01:17, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
			He is in the process of giving final shape to 2 more projects- one is a book on scientific spiritualism and another is the compilation of his travelogues of the journeys he has undertaken. Both of them are also of excellent quality.
	== Merry Christmas! ==
			As I am absolutely new to this technology of designing a page on wikipedia, I was making many trials and experiments which forced me view how the page was looking like several times.
	<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:green; background-color:red; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
			I would highly appreciate if you please restore the contents of the page on the namespace of this user.
	]] has given you a Christmas tree! Christmas trees promote ] and are a great way to spread holiday cheer. Merry Christmas!
			Thanking you,
			sincerely yours,
			Abha Mittal <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			*Sorry, but I'm unable to restore the page. As your topic header notes, I was the editor who nominated the page, but it was actually deleted by an administrator. Your Misplaced Pages User page is meant to be for your goals as a Wikipedian, not for article drafts. I suggest you review ], which will give you more information on how to create a proper draft and prepare it for article space. Also worthy of your time are ], ] and additional pages like ] to help you correctly format your draft. Creating a new article on Misplaced Pages is not easy if you have no previous experience, so you may want to start smaller, with a few edits to articles, to learn the ways of this place. Best wishes! ] (]) 04:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
	Spread the WikiLove by adding <nowiki>{{subst:User:The Utahraptor/Christmas tree}}</nowiki> to any editor's talk page with a friendly message. <br />
	</div> ]] 01:21, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
	==Talkback==
	{{talkback|Courcelles|ts=00:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)}}
	== Happy tenth anniversary ==		== Thank you ==
			Thank you so much Jusdafax for giving me your valuable guidance. I'll seek the help of the administrator in getting the page restored.
	<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000000; background-color:#aa9944; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
			Sincerely yours,
			] (]) 11:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Abha Mittal
			== Request for Biography page ==
	<center><big>'''Happy 10th anniversary of Misplaced Pages!'''</big></center>
			Hi jusdafax, I got your message; can you please help me in publishing my contribution. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	]] has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the ] by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy! <br />
			*To be brief, I can't help because you have used your User page for a draft of an article you wrote about yourself, which is frowned on here per ]. It's also an issue per ]. Again, my suggestion is to put the page in Draft space or a Sandbox, and get further advice from someone other than me, probably an administrator. I also suggest you do some editing of different articles, because as of this posting you also appear to be a ], here not to build an encyclopedia only to promote yourself. Best wishes, ] (]) 12:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
	Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{tlsu|User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. <small>Message received at 18:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC)</small></div><!-- User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch --> ]] 18:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
	:Many thanks, Wayne! ] 19:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
	== RfA ==		== Domo ==
			How dare you block me! Domo confirmed the death hoax and I provided you with a proper link. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	Many thanks; I'll be running again in a few months once I've ironed out some of the issues that people raised. Thanks again, ]] 19:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
	:My pleasure! ] 19:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)		*User indeffed by an admin. ] (]) 22:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
	== A drink ==		== PBBs vs. kepone ==
			How come that you judge ]s to have a mid importance, while you assign high to ] (chlordecone)? IMHO <s>PCBs clearly</s> PBBs have a higher importance from an environmental (and public health) perspective. --] 08:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
	<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000000; background-color:#aa9944; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
			*Happy to review the importance rating, and in fact I agree. If you'd care to do the honors, that's great, otherwise I'll switch them tomorrow. Cheers! ] (]) 08:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
			:] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> On further thought and study, both articles are high importance, so I have upgraded the PBB article to high. PBB's of course are related to PCB's, though not actually the same thing. Kepone is a banned substance as well. If you want to downgrade it, I won't dispute it, but I think it's a good case for high importance. Cheers! ] (]) 22:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
			:: That's fine, thanks. --] 22:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
			==Julie Passas==
	] &#124; ] has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the ] by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy! <br />
			I have raised an WP:ANI regarding her edits, here ]. ] (]) 01:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
	Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{tlsu|User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. <small>Message received at 19:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)</small></div><!-- User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch -->
	I haven't bumped into you so much lately until today, so I just wanted to say it's always a pleasure to see your name on my watchlist. ] &#124; ] 19:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
	:Much obliged for the kindly sentiment! Indeed, I have been contributing to the project at a fairly minimal level for several months due to other priorities, but I doubt I'll ever just stop cold... too much fun. My best wishes to you and yours, and I'll most likely see you around at ITN or Rfa! ] 23:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
	::Maybe just ITN. I got my fingers burnt a bit recently, so I think I'll stay out of the kitchen for a little while (rants at BN excepted!). ] &#124; ] 23:19, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
			*As I say at ANI, I've filed at AIV, so we can probably close this quickly. ] (]) 01:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
	== talkback ==
			== Thanks ==
	*].] ] 04:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
			Thanks for your kind words in support of my appeal, which just closed and was successful. --] (]) 00:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
	== why you delete ==
			*You are welcome. The process took 100 days or so to complete, which I and others felt was excessive, but now that it is over, my cheerful congratulations! ] (]) 23:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
	my precious prose?--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 07:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	* My apologies, if that was my fault, as it appears to be! I have no idea how that happened! Would you like me to replace it, or would you prefer to do it yourself? ] 07:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	::Oh vey, it would not be easy, i'll let you give it a go first. I bet you edited an earlier version of the discussion by mistake, that is probably the culprit.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 07:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	:::Ok... and you are right, it won't be easy. I'll leave a note on the page first. ] 07:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	::::I fixed it. No problems, accidents happen. ]''' 08:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	:::::Many thanks... that was a most untimely first time for me. Blessings! ] 08:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
			== No citation ==
	== ] accepted edit ==
			You stated I did not include a citation in my edit, however I not only posted a parenthetical citation but also added the CNN article to the references section. Please give more information regarding what YOU view as a valid citation if an international news source doesn't cut it. It just seems like you're trying to get a school out of acknowledging their racism.] (]) 22:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
	Sorry about that; I guess I should have read the talk first. <p> Cheers, →<span class="ad-sig" style="border:3px solid goldenrod;">♠]↔]♣</span>← 21:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
	:No problem, and thanks for the note here. I still think the best wording is "and currently final" but I lost that one. It seems that the pressure to make another movie will be considerable, given the monstrous box office TS3 has gotten. Best wishes! ] 21:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
			*Greetings. I revert vandalism on Misplaced Pages. Please note that you failed to add an edit summary, as the edit screen requested . The edit was also malformed, as it did not fit the infobox format. It is indeed true that you added a reference in your previous edit, but that did not show up in the edit you made, again without an edit summary. Since you are a new editor, it's understandable. However, when you accuse me of what you think "seems" to be, you are crossing a line, and creating needless drama. Take your time, learn the formatting rules to edit Misplaced Pages, and cool the veiled accusations, is my advice. ] (]) 22:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
	== Misplaced Pages Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors ==
			== Your Sinclair Edits ==
	Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the ], and specifically the role of ]. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Misplaced Pages in their classes.
			Unless you think that Simon Cooke, olympic sailor also wrote for Your Sinclair magazine, you might be confused. Generally, links to other wikipedia pages don't require citations. I'm not sure what kind of proof you'd expect as a citation, other than links to the actual magazine. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the ]; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
			*Hello. I see the article the Misplaced Pages link leads to is an article that was deleted, but is under review. I also see you have reverted my edit, but I won't revert further pending the outcome. Best wishes. ] (]) 04:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
			* * Thank you. Yeah, there were some recent changes that led to another biography page ended up linked to this one; hopefully this will all get resolved soon so that the link stays correct (or goes away). ] (]) 05:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
			== Speedy Deletion of my Account ==
	You can find instructions for applying at ]. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).
			Hello!
	I hope to hear from you soon.--] (]) 18:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
			I see you nominated for the speedy deletion of my account. Honestly, I don't blame you. I am new to Misplaced Pages and may not have grasped the essentials of adding and editing articles here.
	:Thinking this over; will get back to you on your page. Thanks, it's a honor to be considered. ] 20:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
			Perhaps, I was hoping you could be of help in giving me some advice...
			Regards! ] (]) 06:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
			*Hi there. Yes, learning effective editing technique, and understanding the many policies and editor culture here, is the big challenge on this website. I suggest reading ] for starters. As for the User Page that was deleted (not your account, or user identity) it's generally about one's interests and goals on Misplaced Pages, not a personal biography.
	== Harry Potter (film series) ==
			:You can start a new User Page with that in mind ; ] is a place to start (you will see a reccomendation of "limited" personal details) and ], ] and ] are important for editing articles in mainspace. English Misplaced Pages is a big confusing place that takes study at the start. I learned a lot by looking at the coding in edit screens, and copying coding methods. I hope this helps. ] (]) 07:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
	Hi,
			== Translations ==
	The "Casting the roles of Harry, Ron and Hermione" section has been put back to its original place. I know that you were not a supporter of the move in the first place, and I have taken on board your concerns about the timeline of the article, therefore I feel it's best that it should be near the top under the "origins" section to improve the structure of the article as a whole. ] (]) 15:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
			Hi, I received your message about you reverting my change in ]'s page. Your reason for reverting the change is that she is a living person, and in fact, she passed away in 2003. Furthermore, part of the change was merely adding automatic age calculation on the right with the information that is already available in the main article, the change of which I felt should not be reverted. The other change is regarding adding a partner Andy Röper, which is actually directly translated from German Misplaced Pages article ] (since she was a German person, often, there are more information about the people in their native language) and because that article did not cite a source there, I presume that particular article might also not be valid.
	:Thanks HH, for considering my thoughts on that topic. And I'd like to thank you again for your many improvements to the article! ] 23:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
	== NPP ==		== Plan ADOP reverts ==
	NPP has some issues that have been come to light since the launch of our bot to track unpatrolled pages, and troubleshooting some recent tech issues with the special:newpages log. Would you be prepared to chime in with some ideas for an NPP 'School' for new users? This is my very first communication with anyone on the idea, and I would value your feedback here or on my talk page. Regards, --] (]) 06:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)		Hey {{u|Jusdafax}}, I think we should take a better look at the changes made to the ] article. IP 90.173.2.245 has made 20+ changes, adding lots of information. It's with a learning curve (uncited first, etc), but I think we can assume good faith. After your last revert, the user added some text. Can you think of any reason why this text should be reverted? Cheers, ] (]) 08:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
	:For various reasons I am not as active as I once was, but you bring up one of the areas I maintain an interest in. Please let me know if there is a page for discussion, as I think such a 'School' could be a very good thing indeed. Thanks for your coming here, I am flattered. ]]] 06:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
			*Hello, and thanks for your note. At first glance, what with previous repeated warnings, no edit summaries, and an IP who is a ], this looked like an easy call. A further look shows some references were added, so I'll stand down. If you want me to pull my Talk page warning, I will. ] (]) 08:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
	== You're Welcome! ==
			== July 2020 ==
	{{tb|CycloneGU}}
			] ]. We appreciate ], but in one of your recent edits&nbsp;to ], it appears that you have added ], which is against Misplaced Pages's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses ]. Please be prepared to cite a ] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the ]. ''There is no evidence today. Your edit implied that this may be the case.''<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> ] (]) 19:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
	Feel free to chat there if you'd like. I was very active with PC during the trial and now just wish a decision be made one way or another. ] (]) 07:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
	==IRC invitation==
	Because I have noticed you commenting at the current RfC regarding Pending Changes, I wanted to invite you to the IRC channel for . If you are not customarily logged into the IRC, . This under used resource can allow real time discussion at this particularly timely venture of the trial known as Pending Changes. Even if nothing can come from debating points there, at least this invitation is delivered with the best of intentions and good faith expectations. Kind regards. ''']]''' 08:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
	:I was on IRC for about a year when I was an intern at the WMF in San Francisco. I'll think about coming back to IRC but due to other projects I am working on, my time is limited, and IRC just eats more of it up. It is a vital tool for fighting vandals and other Misplaced Pages issues, and I made some lasting friends there, but my life is much more complex than it used to be. Thanks you for the re-invite, and as I say I'll think it over a bit more. ]]] 18:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
			*
	== May Want To Comment ==
			*
	You may want to add your two cents (or pence, whatever) to ] discussion. ] (]) 15:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)		] (]) 15:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
	:I'm sorry to say that the editor in question is someone I attempt to avoid when possible due to his combative nature and unpleasant demeanor (note his block record), and his talk page is a place I don't wish to comment at. Thanks just the same for the notice. I continue to feel your act of removing his latest poll was quite right, and I salute you for it. What time I have here of late is perhaps best spent lightly, rather than getting bogged down. Good fortunes to you! ]]] 18:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
	::Tis fine...he deleted it NEway, so I copied it to mine. Wanna chime in on mine since he has no permission to edit things off my my talk page? ] (]) 00:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
	:::You may find this of interest. ]]] 00:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
	::::I do! Thank you for pointing this out; I've noted it in reply to his most recent comment about how he's busy. ] (]) 00:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
	::::I've also commented there agreeing with you. ] (]) 01:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)		*I see you have not responded to my links, which contradict your assertion in italics. ] (]) 22:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
	== David Yates ==
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
			The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	Hi again. I have nominated the ] article for GA status. All I need now is for someone to review it. Could you take a look at the article to see if its any good and, if you think it is, would it be possible for you to have a go at reviewing it (])? That's if you have time of course. I am not permitted to review the article because I have extensively worked on it for some time. I am desperate to get this into GA status as I think it's a good looking article. If you can't help, no worries. Thanks. :) ] 23:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
	:Hi HH! I am honored to be asked to do this review. But the problem is, as I note above, I am able to spend very little time on Misplaced Pages of late. If no one steps up in a timely fashion I could give it a try, but I have never reviewed an article for GA before! Those two factors could be hard to overcome. I recently put up a notice at the ] talk page regarding a possible GA review for that article. There were a few good comments from people who sound like they know more about the process than I do; could I suggest you ask them for advice or a review? I will keep watch of this matter. By the way, at first glance the article appears to be in great shape for a GA review. Best wishes, ]]] 07:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 19:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
	::OK, no problem. :) One of the issues brought up on the film series article was the reference formatting. I'll try to sort that out soon and hopefully it'll be ready for nomination. ] 09:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
			== Perchlorate Page Update ==
	:::Yes and that is an area I'm no expert in. I will hope to watch and learn! ]]] 07:40, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
			Hello - I saw you made the most recent edits on the perchlorate. I wanted to inform you that the U.S. EPA has recently made a final determination on perchlorate and this information could be added to the section on "Regulation in the US - drinking Water.
	== Marc Dalton ==
			A link to the notice in the Federal Register is here:
			https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/07/21/2020-13462/drinking-water-final-action-on-perchlorate
			I would be grateful if you could update the page. As I am a consultant to companies that use and manufacturer perchlorate it would not be appropriate for me do to so.
	(Continued from Bearcat's talk page) ]]] 08:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
			Thank you in advance - happy to answer any questions. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	There are several MLAs facing recall campaigns; it's not unique to him. It's also sourced only to the websites of specific groups involved in the recall effort and not to any ] — thereby making it most likely an attempt to use his Misplaced Pages article to publicize and promote the recall campaign — and the recent edits which changed the description of the recall effort from "part of the FightHST campaign led by former Premier ]" to "part of an NDP backed effort to Re-fight the last BC election from May 2009" are a pretty clear ] violation obviously meant to discredit the campaign. For what it's worth, I've lost count of the number of times I've had to pageprotect British Columbia MLAs in the past six months or so due to extreme partisan editwarring. ] (]) 08:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
			*Hello. Actually, I have never edited the perchlorate article. I did add a template to the article Talk page, but that's quite a different matter. A Google search of the term "perchlorate not regulated" leads me to believe the topic is complex and contentious, and at this time I have other priorities on Misplaced Pages and elsewhere, so I'm going to decline, but thanks for asking. Perhaps one of the other editors on the article can be of assistance. Best wishes, ] (]) 00:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
	:So I assume it is the photo caption that is objectionable? ]]] 08:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
	== Article rotting away ==		== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago ==
			{{User QAIbox
			| title = Awesome
			| image = Cscr-featured.svg
			| image_upright = 0.35
			| bold = ]
			}}
			--] (]) 05:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
			*Thanks. Quite a decade... ] (]) 03:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
	See - an IP editor has completely changed the tone of the article to declare that the subject of the article is a conspiracy. No longer NPOV, yet I hesitate to revert completely. ~<font color="blue">]]]</font><sup>(]]])</sup> 14:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
	:{{done}} I took the article back to the last stable version, which is not to say it doesn't need considerable work. ]]] 15:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
			== Reverted... Why!? Internet.org ==
	== Task force ==
			Hi, I have added that site (https://hahahafunnyjokes.blogspot.com) in the "Available websites" section... It was surprising for me that you have removed the site just because you don't like it!? WHY? FreeBasic service allowed this site and it should be in the section of the Available website... what's wrong with it? Please add this site again or give me a logical reason.
	Per Tryptofish's recommendation ], which was about the discussion ], would you be interested in participating, and if so, would it be possible for you to round up some people who share your views and keep in touch with them as the task force makes recommendations? - Dank (]) 21:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
			https://en.wikipedia.org/Internet.org#Available_websites
			Are You There...? Could you please respond on it? I am waiting for your answer.
	:Dank, thanks for your interest in my participation per Tryptofish, for which I am grateful to you both, and flattered. I have read the pages you linked to, and am glad to see that Jimmy Wales feels something is very broken in the Rfa process. It is my opinion that he is right.
			*I am returning from an extended WikiBreak, and see that my edit reverting you was six months prior to your statements here, and that I am not alone in judging your edit to be spam and reverting it. Since a warning was placed on your Talk page, you seem to have cooled down, and the matter appears to be concluded. ] (]) 03:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
	:Tryptofish has mentioned Ben MacDui and I because, as you may or may not know, of our work on ] which in brief, in early 2010 attempted to present the community with a reasonable process to remove adminship from those the community felt were abusing the tools, even in marginal but well documented ways that might not quite make the cut for a case before ArbCom. Again as you may or may not know, the final stages of Community DeAdminship discussions were difficult, followed by a bruising RfC that failed due to the documented disapproval of the Admin community, ironically the very editors whose actions Cda was designed to make more accountable. By the way, MacDui and Trypto's contributions were more substantial than my own, in my view. They did a lot of painstaking work. If it came down to it, I'd be happy to work with them again. ''However''...
	:At the time we labored on Cda, I was a stealth helper (in that I did not advertise it) at the WMF in San Francisco, working as a part-time assistant to ]. As such my identity was disclosed to the WMF. My work there gave me a unique perspective on many of the issues facing Misplaced Pages, to say the least. After seven months, I retired honorably from the position last May when I moved from California. I have since adopted a lower profile, for a number of reasons.
	:I mention this because I feel that to deal with Jimmy's dismay, echoed in much of the wider community, over the broken Rfa process, a simple Misplaced Pages task force is not going to cut it. While I could be wrong, my experience with Cda would seem to validate this. What follows goes considerably beyond your request, but I honestly feel it is vital to do so.
	*''It is my strong opinion that most issues dealing with entrenched admins, many of whom became admins five or more years ago when standards were considerably more relaxed and whom would not pass an Rfa today, require thinking outside the box. Deliberations on adminship by a community whose true identities are unknown, by their nature generate more heat than light, go on at excessive length, and wind up turning reasonable voices away.'' Therefore, I suggest:
	*A newly created and appointed ''' 'Misplaced Pages-en Extraordinary Council' ''' of five to nine members who have substantial edit histories or otherwise have major involvement in the encyclopedia, who would disclose their identities to the WMF if they had not already done so.
	*The Council would meet in conference call, possibly via Skype, and be tasked to determine in real time and with a concrete deadline what exactly the problems are with Rfa and how the issues can be fixed with a minimum of wasted time.
	*This council, with the guidance and approval of the WMF, would report to Jimmy Wales and the WMF directly. If approved, the report would be made public and presented to the community.
	*A short period of non-binding Misplaced Pages-en community comment would be then be sought.
	*If the report's conclusions and recommendations are accepted they will be acted on and implemented directly.
	*The Council would then be disbanded.
	There you have it. Feel free to pass this on, up to and including Jimmy's page, as you see fit, or ignore it completely. But I can't be much more candid than I am here about the best way to deal with this issue. ]]] 02:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
	:Per your request to stay notified of current developments, see ] - Dank (]) 22:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
	== Vandalism from my IP adress. ==
	Hello, I noticed that you posted on my IP based talk page (Not logged in.) http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:98.28.44.197
	According to the warning, "I" vandalized two articles.
	I would like to state that I did not do what the warning contains. It seems that my IP and the immature person who believes that John Constable was "A famous artist who eats bugs" have been confused, or mixed.
	I would like to reiterate, I did not perform these edits.
	Thank you,
	Ckhi Kuzad 04:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	*From 2009! For what it is worth, my apologies for the accusation. And as far as Misplaced Pages is concerned, no one holds anything that ancient against you or whoever did the edits in question. Best wishes, ]]] 15:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
	==WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter==
	The ''']''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! ] (] • ]) 21:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
	== RfA reform ==
	Hi Jusdafax. Please don't hesitate to join the ]. --] (]) 08:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
	*It's an honor to be asked, so many thanks, will do. ]]] 09:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
	== That RfA reform thing ==
	Kudpung has asked me to 'nudge' some people .. as I'm an idle get, I'm just going through the entire Task Force list so my apologies if you didn't need a nudge! You can slap me about over on ] if you like :o)
	Straw polling various options: ] - please add views, agree with views, all that usual stuff. ] (]) 12:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
	== Easter bunny==
	Apologies. I was lagging behind others fixing the original vandalism and undid the wrong edits. You fixed it before I could.--] (]) 01:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
	*That's what I figured. Thanks for your work! ]]] 01:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
	== AIV on IP ==
	I blocked , but remember: Except for ] we do not "shut down" (i.e., block indefinitely) IPs. We can block them for a year at a time if they get to that point. But not until then. ] (]) 03:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
	*Thanks Daniel. I'm a bit rusty at reporting to AIV and my terminology was not clear. Anyway he's not going to reoffend in the near term, and given the ugly nature of his vandalism, that is what is important. Thanks again for taking the time to write me a note! ]]] 06:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
	::You're welcome! ] (]) 14:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
	==WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter==
	The ''']''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! ] (] • ]) 22:45, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
	== Talk page ==
	No problem. I rarely undo talk page vandalism, leaving that to the editor who owns the page, but this was pure gibberish. ] (]) 12:49, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
	== RFC discussion of User:Philip Baird Shearer ==
	A ] has been filed concerning the '''conduct''' of {{User|Philip Baird Shearer}}. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. -- <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">] ]</span> 10:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC) <!-- Template:ConductDiscussion -->
	== ] ==
	'''Task Force news''': Recent updates include basic minor changes and condensing at the ], additional comments on the ], a new project sub page and talk for ], and messages at ]. A current priority is to reach suggested ], and then to establish a local consensus vis-à-vis clerking. Please remember to keep all the project and its talk pages on your watchlist. --] (]) 03:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
	==Lincoln memorial/Legacy section==
	We are currently attempting to bring the Lincoln article to FA status and are trying to establish consensus regarding images. Your consensus and opinion is needed on the ]. -- ] (]) 21:30, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
	== Another interaction ban proposal for Sarek and TT ==
	I have proposed another interaction ban between TreasuryTag and SarekOfVulcan. Since you commented in the last ban discussion that failed to gain consensus I am notifying you of this one. See - ]. Cheers.] (]) 22:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
	== ITN Notice (self template) ==
	{{tmbox
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 26 May, 2011, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].
	}}<!--Template:ITN credit--> ]]] 20:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
	==WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter==
	The ''']''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! ] (] • ]) 01:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
	== Recent change patrol ==
	Hello, I'm wondering if I could ask you a couple questions about Misplaced Pages's culture of volunteerism for a radio program I'm working on. If you have a few minutes, please email me jrdnbwnATgmail.com... thanks! ] (]) 13:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
	:Sorry not to have gotten back to you. I am curious why ''I'' was selected for your survey, as I am not exactly the most active editor for the past six months or more. Thanks. ]]] 05:31, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
	== Task force ] update ==
	Hi. As of 20 June: More stats have been added on candidates and !voter participation. Details have been added about qualifications required on other Wikis for candidates and RfA !voters. Some items such as clerking, !voters, and candidates are nearing proposal stage. A quick page`link template has been added to each page of the project. Please visit those links to get up to speed with recent developments, and chime in with your comments. Thanks for your participation.
	<small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] at 08:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC).</small>
	<!-- Delivery requested by ] and approved by ]. -->
	== you erased an entire thread ==
	at the ArbCom talk page. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;].] 02:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
	*My apologies. Had an edit conflict and edited the wrong box... it seems. Can I undo or what would you suggest? ]]] 02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
	**Undone. :) ] ]<sup>·</sup>] 02:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
	***Many thanks. Usually I'm much more careful, especially when the matter is of such crucial importance, though I try to take care at all times. Again, my apologies and gratitude for the speedy repair job. ]]] 02:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
	****No prob. It didn't look intentional, and I figured it would be easiest to just undo, rather then wait for you (or someone else). ] ]<sup>·</sup>] 02:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
	== Your input is requested ==
	Greetings!
	As a member of the ], your input is requested at the ''']''' page, which consists of ideas that have not yet been discussed or developed.
	Please look though the ideas and leave a comment on the talk page on the proposal(s) you would most like to see go forward. Your feedback will help decide which proposals to put to the community. And, as always, feel free to add new suggestions. Thanks!
	], coordinator, RfA reform 2011
	<small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] at 07:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC).</small>
	<!-- Delivery requested by ] and approved by ]. -->
	== Question re: declined speedy for ] ==
	Hi there, Causa Sui. I see you declined my speedy delete request for ] and 'PROD'ded the article for the much lengthier process.
	Given that the article creator has the same name, this is a pretty clear case of ], as I see it. I spent some time in various search engines looking this guy up, and the claims of notability did not check out: all I found were his own blog posts. My question is, is the mere self-assertion of notability (by a self-creator, in this case) a reason '''not''' to add the speedy template, under Misplaced Pages guidelines, or is there 'grey area' around this? If the former is policy, does this not add to the burden at Afd? I also found it of interest that the creator had self-removed the speedy template and failed to respond in any way on the article talk page or his own. Thanks for helping me to understand this issue, ]]] 07:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
	:Hey, thanks for the message. My understanding of CSD A7 is that it only applies to articles that do not even ''assert'' significance, regardless of the quality of the citations. Of course, these standards are constantly evolving in practice, and after about a year hiatus I may not be completely up to date on the cutting edge interpretation. But from spending some time handling speedy deletion candidates, I can tell you this: A7 is in practice being interpreted quite broadly, and it's possible that another administrator would have speedied the article for A7 had she been the one to review it. My feeling is that administrators are sneaking a few "around back" here and there because they're articles that nobody would want to have included and the deleting is unlikely to be challenged. Maybe that explains why you are surprised that I declined it. For whatever reason, I choose not to do that. If you feel that there is outstanding precedent on this or that my interpretation of A7 as it currently stands is too narrow, please let me know that you think that, and why. Otherwise, it may be a good idea to bring this up on ]. Regards, ] (]) 16:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
	==WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter==
	The ''']''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the ]. --Happy editing! ] (] • ]) 04:41, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
	== WP:RFA2011: RfA on other Wikipedias ==
	A detailed table and notes have now been ]. It compares how RfA is carried out on major Wikipedias (English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). If you feel that other important language Wikipedias should be added, please let us know. This may however depend on our/your language skills!
	<small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] at 22:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC).</small>
	<!-- Delivery requested by ] and approved by ]. -->
	==Response to your comment on Raul's talk page==
	Jusdafax, it wasn't an empty threat. I don't mind when someone disagrees with me, but when someone calls me a liar, I remember it. Please feel free to put my user talk page on your watchlist, and I've noted that you have called me a bully for taking exception to being called a liar. I will also post this response to your talkpage to make sure you receive it. ] (]) 07:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
	*The 24 hours is long past, and you have not acted, so your actions, which you admit are a threat, appear to me to be empty. Feel free to "note" any comment of mine that you want (which smacks of your attempt to foment a 'Cirt's enablers' list at his recent Rfc/U), and your wording and posting on my personal page ("to make sure I receive it") are noted in turn. My question is, if you object to your self-described threatening actions being called those of a bully, what else would you call them? Collegial? I'll take any reply from you on ], '''and hereby request that you stay off my page permanently, as I find your manner and tactics offputting at best.''' ]]] 08:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
	:*I haven't called anyone names, but you have, and you're saying that ''I'm'' the bully? In spite of this, you, and anyone else are always welcome to post on my talk page. ] (]) 23:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
	== ] is in danger. ==
	Do you think you can fix this article so it's a little different than what the individual film articles says. Also see it's talk page to understand why. ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 21:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
	== Rfc on WTC 7 info deletion at ] ==
	I've opened an Rfc on the article talk page per your suggestion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Ghostofnemo#Continued_deep_concerns_regarding_attacks_on_you ] (]) 02:10, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
	:Here's a link to the Rfc: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:9/11_conspiracy_theories#Rfc_on_deleted_WTC_7_information ] (]) 02:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
	==Please comment on ]==
	{{Quote box|title = Responding to RFCs|width = 35%|quote=<p>Remember that RFCs are part of ] and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also ].</p>}}
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned ] position, and is ]. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
	''You have received this notice because your name is on ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' <!-- Template:FRS message --> ] (]) 02:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
	==WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter==
	The ''']''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the ]. --Happy editing! ] (] • ]) 03:55, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
	== blocking ==
	Hi, ] has been had final warnings for vandalism which have been breached this evening. You gave him earlier warnings for vandalism a few months ago. I wonder if you could investigate. He seems intent on ]. Thanks. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">] (])</font> 22:52, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
	== Que pasa? ==
	Jusdafax, how are you? You've not been here in a while--I hope you found something useful to do with your time. All the best, ] (]) 18:27, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
	:I'm good, thanks. Personal considerations led to a decision to take a summer wiki-break, but as of today I've made a few edits and expect to ease back into matters again. Thanks for your interest! ]]] 00:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
	== RfA Reform update ==
	Hi. It's been a little while since the last message on RfA reform, and there's been a fair amount of slow but steady ]. However, there is currently a flurry of activity due to some conversations on .
	I think we're very close to putting an idea or two forward before the community and there are at least two newer ones in the pipeline. So if you have a moment:
	*Have a look at ] and familiarise yourself with the statistics, I'd appreciate comment on ].
	*Any final comments would be appreciated on the ] proposal.
	*Feedback on the two newer proposals - ] & ]. Both are more radical reforms of RfA and might run along side the current system.
	Thanks for reading and for any comments that you've now made.
	<small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] at 21:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC).</small>
	<!-- Delivery requested by ] and approved by ]. -->
	== ITN Notice (self template) ==
	{{tmbox
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 22 September, 2011, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].
	}}<!--Template:ITN credit--> ]]] 00:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
	== News and progress from RfA reform 2011 ==
	{{collapsetop|bg=#33FFCC|RfA reform: ...and what you can do now.}}
	<small>(You are receiving this message because you are either a task force member, or you have contributed to recent discussions on any of ].)</small>
	'''The number of nominations''' continues to nosedive seriously, according to ]. We know why this is, and if the trend continues our reserve of active admins will soon be underwater. Misplaced Pages now needs suitable editors to come forward. This can only be achieved either through ] to the current system, a ], or by ].
	'''A lot of work''' is constantly being done behind the scenes by the coordinators and task force members, such as monitoring the talk pages, discussing new ideas, organising the project pages, researching statistics and keeping them up to date. You'll also see for example that we have recently made tables to compare how other Wikipedias choose their sysops, and some tools have been developed to more closely examine !voters' habits.
	'''The purpose of ]''' is to focus attention on ''specific'' issues of our admin selection process and to develop RfC proposals for solutions to improve them. For this, we have organised the project into ] each with their own discussion pages. It is important to understand that all Misplaced Pages policy changes take a long time to implement whether or not the discussions appear to be active - getting the proposals right ''before'' offering them for discussion by the broader community is crucial to the success of any RfC. Consider keeping the pages and their talk pages on your ]; ''do'' check out older threads before starting a new one on topics that have been discussed already, and if you start a new thread, ''please'' revisit it regularly to follow up on new comments.
	'''The object of ]''' is ''not'' to make it either easier or harder to become an admin - those criteria are set by those who !vote at each RfA. By providing a unique venue for developing ideas for change independent of the general discussion at ], the project has two clearly defined goals:
	#Improving the environment that surrounds RfA in order to encourage mature, experienced editors of the right calibre to come forward, pass the interview, and dedicate some of their time to admin tasks.
	#Discouraging, in the nicest way possible of course, those whose RfA will be obvious NOTNOW or SNOW, and to guide them towards the advice pages.
	The fastest way is through improvement to the current system. Workspace is however also available within the project pages to suggest and discuss ideas that are ]. Users are invited to make use of these pages where they will offer maximum exposure to the broader community, rather than individual projects in ].
	] - let's not clutter the project with perennial chat. RFA2011 ''is now ready'' to propose some of the elements of reform, and all the task force needs to do now is to pre-draft those proposals in the project's workspace, agree on the wording, and then offer them for central discussion where the ''entire'' Misplaced Pages community will be more than welcome to express their opinions in order to build consensus.
	'''New tool''' Check your RfA !voting history! Since the editors' RfA !vote counter at X!-Tools has been down for a long while, we now have a new to replace it. A significant improvement on the former tool, it provides a a complete breakdown of an editor's RfA votes, together with an analysis of the participant's voting pattern.
	'''Are you ready to help?''' Although the main engine of RFA2011 is its task force, ''constructive'' comments from any editors are always welcome on the project's various talk pages. The main reasons why ] was never successful in getting anything done are that threads on different aspects of RfA are all mixed together, and are then archived where nobody remembers them and where they are hard to find - the same is true of ad hoc threads on ].
	{{collapsebottom}}
	<small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] at 15:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC).</small>
	<!-- Delivery requested by ] and approved by ]. -->
	== WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter ==
	The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —] (] &#124; ]) 16:41, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0177 -->
	==New Page Patrol survey==
	{| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
	| ]
	<big>'''New page patrol – ''Survey Invitation'''''</big>
	----
	Hello {{PAGENAME}}! The ] is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
	*If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
	*If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
	'''Please click to take part.'''<br>
	Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
	----
	<small>You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see ]</small>
	|}
	== WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter ==
	The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —] (] &#124; ]) 15:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0192 -->
	== ] ==
	A request for comments ] on administrator User:F&aelig;. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. <!-- Please note that this notification is being delivered by request and by a neutral party. --> Thank you, ] (]) 19:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
	==Talkback==
	{{talkback|Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism|ts=22:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)}} --] <span style="border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;"><small>If you reply here, please leave me a {{]}} message on ].</small></span> @ 22:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
	== Exopolitics ==
	I agree with your post of Dec 5, 2010, where you advocated that Exopolitics should have it's own page, and not point to the work and viewpoint of only Michael Salla. This is not a slight against Michael who I know quite well and consider a friend. Michael might have been one of the origional founders of the exopolitics movement, along with Alfred Webre... but others such as Stephen Bassett and Paola Harris jumped into the mix very shortly after. It is now a world wide movement with 25+ nations having Exopolitics webpages. There is not one school of thought for how Exopolitics should move forward. It is more like a growing political ideaology, ie: like a new party along the lines of democratic social liberalism with UFO reality as a fundamental given. It is also very much about saving our planet. This is a subject matter that is not about one person.
	] (]) 16:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
	== I'm not vandalising Misplaced Pages ==
	I just came to Misplaced Pages, and before I logged in, I got a message to my IP address warning me to stop vandalising WP.
	I have not the slightest idea what's going on, because none of the edits in question are anything to do with me. In fact in the six years I've been here, I have never done anything that could remotely be called vandalism. Most of what I do, in fact, is of the wikignome variety.
	So I'm puzzled, especially since I'm not particularly technologically savvy.
	Can you enlighten me, by any chance? I'll watch here in case you can give me an answer.
	Thanks! ] (]) 22:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
	*I'm puzzled too. Might be someone is pranking you. Did the message say what article was vandalized, and say who sent it? In any case I'm also puzzled how it is you are asking me about this matter, as I am not an admin and am semi-inactive of late. Regardless, best wishes! ]]] 05:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
	::I'm asking you because you (apparently?) gave 173.212.85.30 their most recent "cut it out or get blocked" warning, even though it was a couple of years ago. Since IP numbers change, could I have inherited one that was / is being used by this vandal? In any case, it occurs to me that I might also check into that question with the company. Thanks for your response. ] (]) 12:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
	==Dispute resolution survey==
	{| style="background-color: #CCFFFF; border: 4px solid #3399cc; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
	| ]
	<big>'''Dispute Resolution – ''Survey Invite'''''</big>
	----
	Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Misplaced Pages, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.
	'''Please click to participate.'''<br>
	Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.
	----
	<small>You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated ]. <font face="Verdana">] ] <sup>]</sup></font> 02:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)</small>
	|}
	== Thanks ==
	Thank you for your support at my RfA - and for your congratulations. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. ] (]) 18:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
	== ITNC ==
	can you mark the summit of the americans and the guinea-bssau coup as "ready"?] (]) 09:49, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
	*It's tempting but I don't think we have consensus yet. ]]] 10:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
	==Cap-Haïtien==
	I'm confused. you said I vandilised ]. I did not, and visted that page for the first time, today, when I was told I had a new message from you. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	*It appears we are talking about something that happened two years ago. Could be I was wrong.... I do note others warned you about the article besides myself, resulting in a block which has since expired. Bottom line: I'm confused too, but since so much time has gone by the point is probably moot. My best wishes, ]]] 06:49, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 21:24, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
	== ''Sgt. Pepper'' straw poll ==
	There is currently a straw poll taking place . Your input would be appreciated. ~ ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 00:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
	== "The/the" request for formal mediation ==
	FYI, I have requested formal mediation ] to decide the "The/the" issue, hopefully once and for all. Feel free to add your name there if you so wish. ~ ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 00:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
	== A barnstar for you! ==		== A barnstar for you! ==
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"		{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]		|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''the Civility Barnstar'''		|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Surreal Barnstar'''
	|-		|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For defending civility even when it is not the popular choice. ~ ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 07:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)		|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | thanks for helping me out :) ] (]) 14:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
	|}		|}
	*My humble thanks, I truly appreciate the sentiment. I couldn't help but notice Jimbo's comments on your talk page regarding an unrelated matter. I think he brilliantly points out how this project of ours must proceed, with all of us observing The Golden Rule. Again, with gratitude, ]]] 07:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
			*Thanks, though I can't recall how I was of assistance. Cheers! ] (]) 03:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
	== New LBH Edits ==
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
	Hello Jusdafax - I've noticed that you have shown interest in creating an accurate and well-written article on ] from a significant number of thoughtful edits. I'm dropping by now to ask if you'd take a look at a really long addition to the article here ]. I have some serious concerns about the presence of this addition to an already very long article that still needs very substantial editing and sourcing. I am not canvassing, and I could easily rv or rewrite on the bases of length, relevance, writing, and suspect sourcing (''History Channel''?). It is a good faith edit, as was the earlier "Role of Non-Combatants that I cut down by 75% to what seemed to be strictly relevant to the article. But I think some other eyes need to look it over - I'm also posting this on ]'s page. Any help would be appreciated. regards, ] (]) 04:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
	*I just decided to be bold and reverted it, after noticing that this editor has been with us two days and was rejected at ]. Thanks for your message and kindly expressed regard; I share your concerns. I have notified the editor and also posted a message on the article talk page, where I invite comments. If I may be frank, while I have taken steps not to discourage what appears to be a promising new editor, I am surprised by the level of skill this editor displays after two days of editing. ]]] 07:22, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
			{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 2px dashed #FF0000; background-color: gold;"
	::Thanks, JDF - knew I could count on you, and I completely agree with your welcoming message to the new user. I'll move on over to LBH Talk for specific comments. regards, ] (]) 07:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
			| style="text-align:center;" |]
			| style="text-align:center;" width="100%"|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:darkblue">Hey, '''Jusdafax'''. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the ]!<br />Have a great day!</span> ] ] 07:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
	==That RFC==
			| style="text-align:right;" |]
	Hi JusdaFax, reading through YRC's RFC you seem to be the only person explicitly accusing him of anti-semitism. Now that maybe that I've missed a particular bit of the evidence, in which case I'd be obliged if you could add a diff to your statement. Or it may be that you are jumping to conclusions re the JDL and/or British Politician edits. I can see how one could interpret a couple of his edits that way, but they could equally be sourced from the POV of a very Orthodox strict religious definition of Jewishness. In any event may I suggest that you double check whatever brought you to that view and either support it with a dif or strike it. Ta '']]<span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers''</span> 15:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
	*Hi WSC. Thanks very much for pointing this out. This ANI thread illustrates some disturbing quotes from YRC aka Off2riorob, and illustrates what I see as a long-term issue with Jewish people that a number of editors also agree is of concern. The thread was archived, but I see that several of Rob's defenders in the thread have since expressed that they have had enough of him at the Rfc. I find it difficult to rummage through Rob's edits since I find his style offensive, and hope you agree that this thread contains enough of Rob's quotes and diffs to illustrate my own concerns. Having made my point, I don't intend to mention it again at the Rfc. I'll add the above link to my comment in the Rfc as a support, yet this is just a small part of this editor's package of issues that have lead to his 19 blocks to date. Thanks again. ]]] 20:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
	**Hi Jusdafax, I'm not disputing 90% of what I've read about him in that RFC. But anti-semitism is a serious charge and one that infuriates people if it is incorrectly used. When I posted on your page earlier I suspected that rather than being Anti-Semitic he might be either a religious fundamentalist or ultra-zionist who rejected some secular Jews as not Jewish because of things like marrying out. Now . But I can understand why some people who are carefully not calling him Anti-Semitic don't want him editing articles on Jewish people. '']]<span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers''</span> 23:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
	As far as I can see a fast trip to Arbcom is called for at this stage, not another block or another mentorship. Let's let the big boys decide. But I cheerfully admit to fearing to go through the Arbcom process as a filer or involved party. From what I can see of the process on the filing page, you have to write up an up to 500 word request with diffs which is just the start of the required typing.. An interesting page I had never contemplated before, and one I find isn't conducive to a generalized complaint about an editor; seems it has to be ''between'' two or more editors with proof you tried to mediate the dispute elsewhere etc., and for the most part I have avoided YRC for the past 3 years. So that leaves me rooting for a braver soul than I (or just one with more time and patience than I usually have) to take this upstairs. That would be those who certified this Rfc, so efforts are being made to trash or otherwise neutralize them. What an ugly mess it is, to be sure. ]]] 07:57, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
	== Thanks ==
	for . I wasn't sure if anyone would think it was half as strong as it was wordy. And I could be wrong . . . after years of studying the ways of the wiki, I still gauge things inaccurately more often than I'd like. ] (]) 10:08, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
	*You and me both... I was leaning away from Arbcom after your well-worded statement, when it wound up there anyway, and perhaps this is just as well. I just hope "that what should be, shall be," to quote Tolkien's ]. Good fortunes to you! ]]] 05:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
	== Re: Youreallycan ==
	Your arbcom statement about Youreallycan was very good. I'm curious if you have noticed the same thing I have over the years. Sometimes I get the sense that I'm talking to two different people using one account. Have you ever had that impression? ] (]) 03:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
	*Thanks for your kind words. I must admit to choosing my phrasing to Arbcom with considerable care. I and others have noted a Good Rob/Bad Rob effect, but I hasten to add I do not believe it to be attributable to either a mental condition or two actual different people. I just think he is a lot moodier than most people. And after three years of drama, I think the community at large has had enough. ]]] 05:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
	**Thanks for the reply. Personally, I'm not convinced. Nobody spells "etiquette" as "etiket". These kind of typos appear a bit too forced, too deliberate. Half the time his spelling is perfect, and the other half of the time, it's like he's typing in a straitjacket. It's one thing to have atrocious spelling. We've seen that with several users, such as ]. When you look at his typos, they don't seem deliberate but entirely random. I still think there is something strange going on with this YRC account, as if two different people are using it. ] (]) 06:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
	***Now that you mention it, I have noticed that aspect. My problem is, I get such a bad feeling from "Rob" that I have spent most of the last 3 years avoiding him. This does merit some thought, however. The other thing I seem to have noticed is his politics, which seem to me to have a severe slant, which I find interesting in a self-proclaimed "POV warrior." ]]] 12:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
	== A barnstar for you! ==
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | This barnstar is awarded to recognize particularly fine contributions to Misplaced Pages ] (]) 20:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
	|}		|}
	*Thank you! I appreciate the positive feedback, and salute you in turn; good fortunes to you always! ]]] 19:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
			Thank you. Thirteen years, eh? Hmmm! ] (]) 03:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
	== '''The Olive Branch''': A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1) ==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>]
			Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
			From the ], ]<sup>]</sup> 19:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
	Welcome to the first edition of ''The Olive Branch''. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in ] (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are ], but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to ].
			</div>
	]
	In this issue:
	* '''Background''': A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
	* '''Research''': The most recent DR data
	* '''Survey results''': Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
	* '''Activity analysis''': Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
	* '''DR Noticeboard comparison''': How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
	* '''Discussion update''': Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
	* '''Proposal''': It's time to close the ]. Agree or disagree?
	<big><center>]</center></big>
			*Thanks, I appreciate it. ] (]) 03:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
	--''The Olive Branch'' 19:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0345 -->
			== Concerns on an editor's recent edits ==
	== your signature ==
			Hello Jusdafax, I am a casual editor who happened to stumble across your user when investigating possible avenues to report a potential issue. I understand you are not an administrator, but I would appreciate any input on this matter.
	Interesting to see you have "chosen" to change the color of your signature: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:In_the_news&curid=485213&diff=511255697&oldid=511219722 ] (]) 18:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
	:Yeah what was that all about? That's a new one, at least!
			I have come across ] (I found your signature on their talk page) across several articles on Texas municipalities that I believe to be concerning. Edits include ] ("redneck" also being present in ]), ], ], seemingly a trend to remove references to other municipalities (], ], ], ]), among other changes. I do not believe these edits to be constructive.
	== LBH Major Problems ==
			I considered reverting many changes, but I am unsure about the actual ''preferred'' action to take here (I am not particularly interested in taking a deep dive into Misplaced Pages policies and processes) and I am not all that interested to be the one to directly tackle this issue. I would appreciate input on this matter (thoughts, comments, issuing a warning, etc.), or if you could please direct this concern to the appropriate request board so that these pages may be restored. Thank you.
	Hi JDF - I know you're as concerned as I about accuracy on the GAC & LBH articles, and we have a problem on LBH. There's a new editor interpolating questionable edits. One on shell casings is OK probably but is sourced from ''Battlefield Detectives'', a junky History Channel show full of speculation and inference. But the big problem is this edit ] which avers that someone named Pennewell survived the last stand. I'm going to RV it politely now, but the source looks legit and I think this may prove to be a problem. regards, ] (]) 09:27, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
	:Agree. TV shows present a particular challenge to sourcing LBH related Wiki-articles. I'll look into this further but I share your concerns and I support your revert. ]]] 16:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
			] (]) 17:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
	== Thanks ==
			:Hello, yes I was concerned about this editor as well some months ago. I see they have been have been blocked earlier today, and if there are further incidents the best thing to do is contact the blocking admin. Cheers, and thanks. ] (]) 02:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
	Thanks for reminding me.
	] ] ] 00:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
	*You're welcome! ]]] 00:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
			== Proposal to merge ] into ] ==
	== Thanks ==
			If you are interested please discuss at ] ] (]) 06:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
	No apologies needed! I've seen some of the stuff at ITN before. I think people personalise their opposes too much. I took the opportunity to comment on the talk page. Cheers again. ]] 19:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
			== I did not make any changes ==
	==Talkback==
	{{talkback|Feezo|Beatles Poll: Suggestion for future interactions|ts=09:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)}}
	— ''''']''''' <sup>(])</sup> 09:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
			Hi, I did not make any changes to Sarcoidosis.
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 06:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
			Cheers, <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 19:15, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
	== A beer for you! ==
			== I did not make any changes either ==
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
			Re University of Bradford. You got the wrong geezer.
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Happy 5th anniversary Jusdafax! ~ ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 01:35, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
	|}
	*Many thanks Gabe! Man, those years went by like nothing. ]]] 02:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
	== quick check. ==		==Yo Ho Ho==
			<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ]
			] (]) is wishing a foaming mug of ]! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's ] or ], ], ], ], ], ] or even the ], this is a special time of year for almost everyone! <br />
	Hi Jusdafax, I believe you have recently editted while logged out. If it is you, can you please update the edit with your signature, and I will oversight the IP address. Also, I would have preferred to email you about this, it may be worth turning on your email. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 08:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
	*Quite right, and I will do, though the email will take a few days. I should never edit after a very long day at work, I suppose. Thanks! ]]] 14:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
	*:All sorted for you. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 14:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
	:::Thanks, and also many thanks for your progressive outlook at the page in question. I have added an additional comment there, virtually a plea, for a wider discussion amongst the participants. ]]] 15:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
			<small>Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to your friends' talk pages</small>.
	== HiLo48 ==
			{{clear}}
			</div>
			== Sorry for that edit ==
	While working on an RfC/U about ], I noticed that you commented here that you wished to be a participant. The draft RfC/U is here: ] if you would still like to participate. --] (]) 03:27, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
	:I'm not surprised by this notice, and will look in at the Rfc/U. Thanks for the heads-up. ]]] 04:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
	::I don't think the latter part of is justified, or constructive. It comes across as a clever snipe, exactly the kind of thing you accuse HiLo (with some justification) of doing. If you're holding out for a Misplaced Pages full of AGF and mutual goodwill (an endpoint I'd love to see myself) you might like to reconsider whether this comes across as too snarky by half. ] ] 21:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
	:::I have taken the liberty of disagreeing with your view on the page in question. My best to you and if you observe the day, Happy Thanksgiving! ]]] 21:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
	Jusdafax I am getting gradually more disillusioned with Misplaced Pages and our inability to enforce rules even after they are repeatedly flouted. I'm not sure what is happening here. Perhaps users who are not affected by disruption can just out-vote the ones who are without any concern for the wider consequences to the project? There are also users which are far cleverer, subtle and more disruptive than HiLo who are looking in here. They appear to conform to the letter if not the spirit of the rules and must feel invulnerable. It worries me if we can't moderate HiLo what chance have we with these other people? This is all the more bizarre due to some administrators taking an aggressive attitude to some editors and not others. We need to ensure that editors are treated equally across the board. I really don't think there are safeguards to ensure this is happening. --] (]) 09:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
			Sorry for the edit that I did. I just think she is beautiful. ] (]) 03:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
	== Request comment ==
			== Liswoski ==
	Your input would be appreciated . ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 03:40, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
			Heard it said numerous times in commentary, and its becoming his moniker in common parlance. Should you all be deciding on Misplaced Pages edits if you don't actually have a working knowledge of what your editing? Just a thought. Thanks. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== ITN/C IP 86.40.106.60 ==
			*Welcome to Misplaced Pages. If you want to add a nickname of "The Whipping Boy" to a ] you will have to add a reliable source per ]. Cheers! ] (]) 23:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
	Hi,
			== care to explain? ==
	I would appreciate your feedback regarding this IP user. The user has made numerous disruptive comments at the Sir Patrick Moore nomination of ITN/C. I've been caught in the trap and reacted, so I can't really start an RFC or other process. Maybe I should just ignore the user. Anyway, I'm reaching out to you because of your involvement in the ongoing HiLo48 saga.
			my addition to the article of elizaveta tuktamysheva was immediately taken down by you for not having a source. this would be fair if several pieces of information, including the one DIRECTLY ABOVE IT, also didn't have a source. is this really about the lack of a source or the fact that you think you're special? pick one. good day. ] (]) 03:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
	http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#.5BPosted_to_ticker.5D_Death_of_Sir_Patrick_Moore
			*Per your statement, I have removed the dating information as well, and added a citation needed tag re:the schooling sentence. May I suggest that you review ] and ] to aquaint yourself with the operative Misplaced Pages sourcing requirements, as well as ], in particular the fourth. ] (]) 03:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
	Thanks,
	--] (]) 19:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)		theres literally no way to source a fan nickname but go off i guess ] (]) 04:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
			== Nigerien vs Nigerian ==
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 12:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
			Hi, I think I am correct in my recent edit to the Hitman 2007 movie page. The scene in question takes place in Niger, not Nigeria, meaning the demonym is Nigerien. Here is a youtube video of said scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjIh7FHeH8c <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== Discussion about Newyorkbrad's closure of Beatles RfC ==
			== Nigerien vs Nigerian ==
	Hello. This is to let you know that there is currently a discussion at ''']''' about ] of ] about whether to use upper-case "The" or lowercase "the" in mid-sentence in articles about (t/T)he Beatles. You are receiving this message because you were involved in the mediation case that led up to the RfC. Some editors have expressed dissatisfaction with the caveat in Newyorkbrad's close that "he suggestion that editors should try to structure sentences to avoid unnecessary mid-sentence use of "the Beatles" remains a valid one", and the discussion is focused on how that caveat is affecting the editing decisions in Beatles-related articles. There is also the opportunity to discuss other aspects of the close should the need arise. Please see the points at the top of the discussion thread and leave a comment if you think it is appropriate. Best regards — ''''']''''' <sup>(])</sup> 13:43, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
			Hi, I think I am correct in my recent edit to the Hitman 2007 movie page. The scene in question takes place in Niger, not Nigeria, meaning the demonym is Nigerien. Here is a youtube video of said scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjIh7FHeH8c <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== Franklomax ==
			== Precious anniversary ==
	Just a quick FYI to clarify something. I saw in {{diff2|529792386|your post at}} user_talk:Franklomax, you had mentioned "''Since this is your first block ...''"; I just wanted to mention that if you check , it will show this is actually the user's third block. --- ] <small>(] • ])</small> - 16:50, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
			{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} --] (]) 06:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
	*Thanks. Silly me, I should have checked. I don't think I would have been as kind had I known this guy isn't learning anything. ]]] 20:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
			*Thank you Gerda. It goes by quick! ] (]) 09:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
	== Happy New Year! ==
			== 2021 World Wushu Championships ==
	{| style="border: 3px solid purple; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
	|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
	|rowspan="3" |
	|style="font-size: large; color: Purple; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''Best wishes for the New Year!'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid Plum;" |Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013! <p>Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my ], and apologies for the false alarm of my the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the ] pages this year. <p>Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; reviews are always welcome at ], ] and ]. but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the ] process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians!<br />
	] (]) 21:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
	|}
			Hi. I am ], the creator of ]. I support your stance that both navboxes ('World Championships in 2021' and 'World Wushu Championships') should be kept, and it seems that
	== ITN Credit ==
			] is acting quite disruptive right now, deleting what you wrote on his talk page and calling it ″nonsense.″ I will be adding the World Wushu Championships navbox back as it is helpful and all other WWC articles have it. ] (]) 17:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
			*Hello. My edits have been called much worse than that over the years. I've reverted the article back to my previous revert, and placed a second warning for unexplained content deletion on the IP editor's Talk page. Cheers! ] (]) 21:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
	{{tmbox
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 17 January 2013, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].
	}}<!--Template:ITN credit--> --]''''']''''' 05:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
	*Many thanks! It's been a while since I got one of these. This credit was earned the hard way, as to get the ITN item up, there had to be an article created. Thank goodness a lot of help came along! Now, if this hostage crisis can just be resolved peacefully... ]]] 07:55, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
			== no problem ==
	==Disambiguation link notification for January 24==
			earning that "]" badge my dear jonas.
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			good man.
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
			it's like "SVU" but for wikipedia. it's cute and charming! ] (]) 02:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
	== Your post to ] ==
			== Untitled re: plane (moved from above) ==
	Your suggestion that I admit to "agressive Wikistalking" is flat out wrong, and ]. My actual comment was: "'''I completely reject''' that it is my responsibility to wikistalk Epeefleche around the encyclopedia and source content that he is too lazy to source himself" (emph. added), as I have repeatedly maintained. I've removed your commentary, leaving just your endorsement. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''&tilde;]'''&nbsp;]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]&nbsp;]</span> 08:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
			!!! I am not a vandal. MOST of what is on the page I have no issue with BUT a government agency CREATED in 1958 did not certify something in 1928!!! (Heath Parasol)
	== Your AIV report ==
			I'D LIKE TO CREDIT AN INNOVATOR... Mr Heath published at least three different versions of his plans in the 1920s, then he later sold kits of one of those plans but to my mind any "flying thing" built to any of those plans is a Heath. Others, notably Mann, credit Heath in the derivative plans they created.
	Hi, Jusdafax. I've watchlisted ]. If the IP continues to disrupt there I will act. Your report was valid but I saw it 3 hours after the fact so action now would not be preventitive. If you see further shenanigans and I don't seem to be around, take your report to the venue you think most appropriate. See ya ]] 04:57, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
			Further NOTHING was certified in the US prior to 1928, only "aircraft" were certified by the CAB 1928-1958 (YOU CAN GOOGLE YOURSELF HERE) and the FAA 1958- (AGAIN GOOGLE "WIKIPEDIA") by legal (FAR 103 -- Guess what! YOU CAN GOOGLE YOU AGAIN!) definition a thing that flies BUT is 254 pounds or less in empty weight is not legally an aircraft.
	== I suspect you're right ==
			YOUR ENTRY LISTS THE PARASOL AT 280 pounds with a 105 pound engine, but some INCLUDING MINE were built with 45 pound engines, that brings them under the 254 pound FAR 103 limit. THAT IS ALL THAT I AM TRYING TO SAY. I love the Parasol, I own one, I'd be happy to share and make the entry on the Parasol better -- I AM NOT A VANDAL but the original author has only told part of the story.
	I suspect you're right in what you said ]. While I don't agree with the outcome, TParis did a very good job.
			Feel free to email me at pa25235c@gmail.com
	There are really so many admin truths to be gleaned from the whole fiasco.
			PS your pages are not easy to navigate <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	] in many ways. Most of the folks commenting at the ANI discussion had no concept of the preventative nature of that particular indef block and the condition logged with it. The consensus there, however whacked it was, was in line with TParis' actions. If there was any doubt, the ] is alive and well.
	I suspect you're right that that editor's disruption is not over, especially judging by the pontificating that has been going on on that editor's talk page. We also learned new things about some of the more extreme commentators there. Apparently it's OK to dehumanize folks someone may disagree with because, of course if they weren't fools, they'd have agreed with that person in the first place. Some of the worst behavior I've observed on wiki is evidenced in this episode.
			*Hello Piper PA25235C. I have moved your comment down to the bottom and given it a topic header.
	My thoughts are add gun-related politics to the ] if you want to avoid messy fiascoes. Both sides of the issue (assuming there are only 2) bring out some of the most visceral reactions with little to back up the emotions.
			I have not termed you a vandal in my templated message on your Talk page, I do however note that your information, which I have reverted, is unsourced. If you could please add a citation, it will help your assertions, which are in my view likely.
	Just my $0.02. Thanks for listening. ] <small>(])</small> 00:17, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
			Misplaced Pages can indeed be confusing for new editors. We run on verifiability as a core concept, per ], and sourcing reqirements per ]. Please read these links carefully, and understand their importance.
	*My pleasure, and thanks for taking the original stand. The ANI thread that got HiLo topic banned, which I posted along with that comment, is a fine example of ANI actually working. Recently I have seen additional evidence of that, so I am much more encouraged than I once was regarding combative problem editors. The terrible irony of all this is that I actually agree with some of the positions taken by HiLo, but vehemently disagree with his extremely harsh polemics. In an era where the WMF is expressing increasing concerns about the editing climate being overly confrontational for women and those not schooled in conflict, I believe the community ''must'' act quickly and decisively to make it clear to a relative handful of bad apples that their inflammatory rhetoric will no longer be tolerated, regardless of their contributions. By the way, thanks again for that barnstar you gave me a couple years ago; I value it highly! ]]] 00:32, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
			Again, I personally don't doubt you, but these policies I mention require sources for big additions to the encyclopedia. If you dont know how to cite material, look at how other material in the article has been sourced, on the edit screen. I hope this helps, and best wishes to you. ] (]) 04:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
	== ITN for ] ==
			== Marky Cielo Suicide Issues ==
	{{tmbox
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 7 February 2013, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you recently updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].
	}}
			Marky Cielo committed Suicide by hanging in there house in Antipolo City because of his Gay Manager wanted to spread their Sex Video in The Public threatening him . His mother Mildred avoid the Police Autopsy and Forensic investigation . On the Funeral his body wearing a Turtle Neck Shirt to hide the scars on his neck . His Family hide the truth about his Death . After his burial Marky Cielo Tomb Park became a Tourist Attraction in Barangay Sinto Bauko Mountain Province between Cadaweng Compound and MIA"S Muffins Houzz Cafe and Restaurant . ] (]) 10:04, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
	Good job. <b>]</b> ] 08:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
	*Many thanks, and best wishes to you! ]]] 09:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
			*Greetings. Please read and understand the Misplaced Pages verifiability policy at ] and the sourcing requirements at ]. The short version is this: information, especially controversial material, must be sourced. I am reverting the article again, please do not restore your edit until you can source it, thanks. ] (]) 10:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
	== AFD ==
			== Lime ==
	Sup! You know you ] right? Your AFD says "prod", specifically as an alternate to AFD. I think you might have meant it the other way around. No biggie, just thought you might want the chance to clarify before people jump in with comments. Cheers, ]] 08:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
	:It appears I have gotten the directions mixed up, as I don't do this frequently enough to remember it. It already has one !vote for delete. By the way, I notified what seems to be the subject of the article on his talk page; all this started when I noticed the article's tags were removed by him. Thanks for the heads up. UPDATE: I fixed the Afd statement so it corresponds with reality. Thanks again ]]] 08:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
	::All good mate - looks like everything was done right either way. Have a good one! ]] 09:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
			My name is Robb Cooper and I am the personal manager for the duo known as Lime. I edited the content and explained why.
	== Arikkadamukku ==
	Hi Jusdafax. The article is still pretty poor stub, but I think it's better than nothing. I remember your username from before, it's good to see you are still around :) --] (] / ]) 09:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
	*Thanks! I seem to have had several stages as a Wikipedian. Others come and go, and here I sit, clicking away on my keyboard. Good fortunes to you and yours! ]]] 08:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			Two impostors named Joy Dorris and Robert Hubertz have been performing illegally as Lime. They've never sung a notebon any Lime song and we've already begun legal action.
	== ITN for ] ==
			That said, please feel free to contact me at 760-464-0500 or 800-617-8161 or robb@robbcoopermediamanagement.net
	{{tmbox
			and ill be happy to put you in contact with the record company, producer and our attorney.
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 17 February 2013, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].
	}}<!--Template:ITN credit--> --''']'''<sup>]]</sup> 23:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
	*I appreciate the ITN notice, so thanks Spencer! ]]] 23:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
			These two imposter seriously diminish the authentication that Misplaced Pages thrives on.
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 09:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			Thank you. ] (]) 21:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 22:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
			*Hello. This may well be true, but you need a reliable source per ] as a citation (]) in the article to confirm that. I suggest you find an article in the media regarding the changes you wish to make that supports your contentions. Please remember that you must use a reliable source per ]. Misplaced Pages is built on the concept of verifiability per ]. Since you are a new editor, it's clear you don't yet understand how the encyclopedia works. I am an unpaid volunteer, and don't call people on the phone to verify information or changes to articles. New editors are often puzzled when they start editing here, because there is a lot to learn about the way this place works. Take your time. Also please be aware of the three revert rule per ]. Best wishes. ] (]) 21:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
	==Proposed closing of Morriswa RFC==
	Hi, Jusdafax. As a person who has commented in the above RFC, your input on a possible closure of the RFC at ] would be appreciated. Thank you. --''']]]''' 05:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
			==Thanks==
	==Please comment on ]==
			Thank you for the barnstar. I appreciate it as an incentive to continue editing -- and to try to be a better wikipedian. ] (]) 20:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 11:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
			*Thanks for the thanks. I've been an admirer of your Wiki-skills for a decade or so, and salute you with good humor. Cheers! ] (]) 23:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
	== Arbcom case ==		== To: Justafax ==
			Sorry, that was just a test from now on I will use my sandbox. ] (]) 02:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
	Hi. I was looking into materials related to the current arbcom case involving Malke 2010 when I noticed your name come up. Back in 2009, Malke was very angry at you after some kind of altercation on the Karl Rove article and she was eventually blocked for edit warring. Right after this happened she said you should be "banned for life" but I'm not really understanding her reasoning other than the fact that she was acting like a clueless newbie. Can you give me some insight on her behavior (conduct) on the article when she interacted with you and tell me if there is any relationship to the Tea Party movement set of articles she is currently working on? Thanks. ] (]) 23:40, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
	:Note, this incident was first discussed . ] (]) 00:54, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
	::Hi Viriditas. I have been on a short wiki-break, but have just returned. Frankly, reading your link leaves me in a state of considerable incredulity. I will comment further as soon as possible. Thanks, ]]] 07:56, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
	After careful examination of the link you provide to ANI in September, 2009, it appears I was never informed of my name being discussed in such terms, so finding out what Malke2010 was up to in that era is a bit of a shock. I have reviewed my own talk archives as well as the Karl Rove talk page, but as I say, I never, to my knowledge, was alerted to the kind of abusive tricks Malke2010 was blocked for, in this particular case by ], who later, if I remember correctly, unsuccessfully mentored Malke2010.
	The period in question involved Malke2010's edits to the ] article. I felt very strongly in the months of August and September, 2009 that an attempt was being made by Malke2010 to "scrub" the article of well-referenced material that a partisan "fan" of Rove might not be comfortable with.
	Eventually I was so disgusted with the way Malke2010 was editing that I found it easier to just walk away from the article rather than continue on dealing with someone I had a very bad feeling about. As your link clearly shows, my instinct was 100% correct. Malke2010's subsequent Misplaced Pages editing career, with numerous blocks despite relatively little activity, speaks for itself.
			== Arent you a little too speedy with the speedy deletion notice ? ==
	What drew me to comment at ANI was the similarity of Malke2010's approach to editing the Tea Party Movement article, which I have never edited and had never even read. I noticed the issue when it came up on ANI, ironically, and felt impelled to comment when two editors I have no history with, ] and ], interacted harshly: North2000 wanted to censure Goethean's objections to ''Malke2010's attempt to do the very same thing there that they had at Karl Rove: create a new sub page and scrub out material that reflected poorly on the subject.'' To quote myself in the recent expanded ANI thread:
			Hi Jusdafax,
	*Malke2010 has indeed ''previously "created a new article on the same topic, but excluded all of the negative material" before this:'' at the sub page created at this link for where they took the most controversial material from Rove's career, then scrubbed out reliably sourced material or added in slanted material like the Moyers material. Virtually every edit there (look at the edit record) is designed to put a positive "spin" on Rove's years in the Bush White House. Additionally, the new sub-article is another "click" away from the reading public, and the controversies sanitized with a summary. ''So Goethean's objections to Malke's similar proposal for the Tea Party article are in fact quite apt'', and North8000 is in fact out of line defending this transparent attempt at obstructionism.
			Arent you a bit too fast to stick a tag for Speedydeletion in my userspace? I havent even hardly started writing the article. I do think I know a little the rules of Misplaced Pages, see my contributions especially at the Dutch Misplaced Pages. Thanks in advance for removing the tag? --] (]) 18:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
			:Allow me to suggest that you copy the article and create a draft article per ]. While it is true that ] allows article drafts in subpages, these subpages are often abused for promotional purposes at odds with the purpose of Misplaced Pages, which brings us to this situation. I see you have contested my nomination, which is your right, of course. An admin will be the judge of this. Pending that decision, I again suggest the course suggested in my first sentence. Thanks. ] (]) 18:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
	So there you have it. I also posted the above on the TPM Talk page but it was removed. I am likely to weigh in at the ArbCom case as it proceeds. If you have any further questions I will be happy to reply. ]]] 05:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
	:Thank you for your detailed reply. I have started a preliminary evidence page at ] if you would like to work on it. If not, please let me know if you have any diffs of recent evidence I could add to it. My own experience with Malke2010 both in the past and present is similar to your own. She comes off as very nice and agreeable, but does not listen to the positions of other people, and often times seems to be advancing her own personal agenda rather than adhering to the policies and guidelines of Misplaced Pages. My sense is that she's really not here to build to an encyclopedia but to represent her "clients". ] (]) 01:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
			:: Thanks for the clarification. In line with your advice I created a draft article to copy the text there, but then the text was already removed, regardless my contest (which I thought would buy me some time)... --] (]) 18:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
	== Tea Party movement arbitration case opened ==
			:::I did too. My apologies. ] (]) 19:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
			== BLP ==
	An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at ]. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at ]. '''Please add your evidence by March 20, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, ]. For a guide to the arbitration process, see ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ''']''' (] • ] • ]) 23:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
			I believe that you are in breach of Misplaced Pages's BLP guidelines. Please immediately restore the page as I wrote it and make no further changes until we have referred these matters to Misplaced Pages administrators.
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 23:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
			Lisa Gorton's secondary schooling is not on topic, and private information.
	== Thanks ==
			It is also incomplete information: Lisa attended Preshil for longer than she attended St Catherine's. Your Misplaced Pages version relies on an interview with St Catherine's school which is littered with inaccuracies.
	..for fixing the indent issue causing the numbers to drop back starting at 1.--] (]) 05:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
	*Most welcome. I realized at once what happened. You would think after 176 Rfa !votes (I just used the Rfa counter tool... amazing!) that I'd remember what to do, but it seems I don't comment much at these events. ]]] 05:52, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
			Lisa did not study poetry under Chris Wallace-Crabbe; or, only with him among many other professors of literature at the University: she did not complete a creative writing degree.
	== Reply to your friendly update ==
			You have also incorrectly named Lisa's undergraduate degree, which is a BA (Hons). The 'Hons' is a year-long addition to the Arts degree.
	Thanks for the update. :) I'm doin alright, gettin over a head cold. &mdash; ''']''' (]) 22:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
	*Good to hear! Me too, actually, and the end of the sniffling is in sight. ]]] 00:16, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
			You have also incorrectly named Lisa's graduate degree. Lisa did not complete a Master of Arts at Oxford. That is a different kind of degree. She completed an MPhil in Renaissance Literature.
	== Vital articles list ==
			Lisa did not win the John Donne Society Award for Distinguished Publication in Donne Studies for her doctorate. She received it for an essay.
	Jusdafax, are you going to continue to participate in the talk page discussion? I actively encourage you to do so; the discussion ''really'' needs more editors who have greater perspective and are well-read in multiple subject areas. I also support your suggestion of structuring the discussion as a rolling article-by-article RfC, with appropriate notices posted throughout Misplaced Pages. In addition to more voices, the discussion desperately needs more structure. Regards, ] (]) 23:44, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
			Lisa did not work for Scaffidi Hugh-Jones. She was an independent, freelance communication consultant. However, the information is private, and not on topic; and, if career information is to be included, your version is skewed and unrepresentative. Lisa has undertaken many other jobs at various times.
	*I am honored by your good opinion. We do seem to see eye-to-eye on many of these big-ticket calls. I have cleared out my next 30 hours or so for Misplaced Pages, and the VA is on my short list of items I consider, uh, vital. Thanks again, see you there soon. ]]] 00:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
			Lisa has never been a full-time writer.
	:*If you have time, you may want to voice your opinion under the section titled "So what now?" ] (]) 22:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
			The rest of your article is a stub, and, as such, misrepresents Lisa's writing life. It does not include anthologies that she has edited and been published in; it does not include public events in which she has participated; it does not include all her publications.
	== "My advice: drop the mass deletion proposals, period" ==
			Lisa's grandparents are not on-topic.
	If we do that, how are we ever going to get this list back down to 10,000 articles with any kind of speed? Also, any chance you could tell Gabe to stop saying I lack knowledge and stop changing his votes because he didn't like what I said somewhere else? <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">]]]</span> 04:21, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
	:It appears to me that the discussion has degenerated to the point where other, more authoritative voices than mine will be needed here. I truly hope you can both cool it, as I believe you are both dedicated to Misplaced Pages's best interests. As for me, I will back away from this mess and hope for the best. ]]] 04:31, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
	::That would be regrettable, JDF. As we have discussed previously, the VA project needs a larger number and a greater variety of voices to make this a more valid exercise. If you're giving up, I may be inclined to do the same, because I have no interest in being caught in the crossfire of two or three bitterly opposed editors who can't or won't agree on sound process. ] (]) 05:31, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
	:::Our talkpage posts crossed. Not giving up, just stepping away for a moment to gain perspective. ]]] 05:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
			https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Jusdafax&action=edit&section=new
	* '''For context'''. - , , , and now . ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 06:20, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
			] (]) 01:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
	*I don't get why you insist on equating me and Gabe. There's a difference, a BIG difference. Gabe continually claims that I know nothing or next to nothing about certain topics; I don't. Gabe personally attacks me in edit summaries and once called me a "Type-A control freak who can't get a girlfriend", I don't. Gabe arbitrarily changes positions based on how he feels about me, I don't. Oh, and there's the whole won't-shut-about-Harry-Potter business <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">]]]</span> 15:21, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
			*Editor blocked by an admin for edit warring. ] (]) 02:12, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
	:*Guys, Winston Churchill is purported to have said "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." I've worked productively on sports articles with PBP in the past, and recently I've come to respect Gabe's passion and contributions regarding the Vital Articles lists. Nevertheless, and at some risk to my working relationships with both of you, I must say that both of you are quickly approaching the threshold of Churchill's definition. It won't be as a result of anything I do, but the two of you are both at risk of being blocked or topic-banned for uncivil and disruptive editing behaviors. When the banhammer falls, it rarely distinguishes between who started it, and who was more responsible than whom. I know I'm not the first third-party to mention this problem to the two of you, so please do yourselves a favor and spend the next week doing your best to kill each other with civility and kindness. Otherwise some passing admin is likely to give you both a timeout. Seriously. ] (]) 23:49, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
	::* I have come to respect DL1 a great deal in these discussions, and once again second him in every word. Take heed, please. ]]] 02:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
			== AA ==
	Jusdafax, several positive events have occurred in the last few days:
			how were they not constructive. All factually correct and supported by citations many of which I included years ago. This seems like a bot like reversal.
			*Greetings, IP. Please remember to sign your Talk page posts and to place them at the bottom, at least on my Talk page. it appears I made a mistake in this revert, and I will restore your edits. My apologies, and best wishes. ] (]) 23:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
	1. I think it has become apparent that there is acceptance of the proposed moratorium. The start date remains to be determined. Personally, I think seven days prior to the start of the clean-up (April 8) should be sufficient.
			Thanks. It’s heartening to see humility and good faith in action. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	2. There appears to be increasing acceptance that there will be no more unilateral BRD changes to the actual lists and sublists. I think an add, delete or swap decision should require at least five affirmative votes for action, with no close split votes.
			== Aladdin ==
	3. I think there is also general acceptance of the evolving organization for individual topic discussions for add, deletes and swaps: discussion, !voting, minimum number of affirmative !votes, keep threads open until critical mass reached, for each topic in question.
			Do not undo someone's edit without discussing it first. You asked me to cite a plot element from the story Aladdin itself? How about you read the story that is the subject of the article (and the SOURCE of my information) before showing your ignorance and demanding a source. DO NOT undo MY edit without discussing it with me first. Or you would be guilty of an edit war. See how that works?
	4. PBP and others have archived all of the dead-end proposals and other threads (and most of the strum und drang) for the list of 10,000, making the talk page a more welcoming place to new participants. This still needs to be done for the list of 1,000.
			* It appears you have either regarding your editing and discussion tone, or have lost interest in collaboratively building an encyclopedia. Good fortunes to you. ] (]) 22:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
	5. Prior ongoing personalized exchanges seem to have been effectively tamped down by the concerned parties (the only way it was ever going to happen, short of blocks or topic bans).
			== UAPTF assesment ==
	I believe that the overall discussion is now far better positioned for likely productive outcomes. Your participation regarding individual topics is solicited, to the extent you feel comfortable participating. The discussions still need more and a greater variety of voices. Yours would help. ] (]) 02:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
			Hey thanks for setting up the Pentagon UAP report article, I've expanded it following most of your content into Background, Report (and maybe in the future "Reactions") sections, let me know what you think of it in the Talk page or here and further help would be much appreciated! --] (]) 07:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
	== Motion to close RFC/U ==
			:Thanks for your note, that article stub was my last editing before a multi-week Wikibreak. At first glance your work appears correct and proper. I'll go back and take a longer look soon. Thanks again! ] (]) 21:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
	You have previously commented on ].
			::Looks like ], or very close to it, for renaming Pentagon UFO Report. You when you created the article. Your input would be appreciated for doing the rename if you have experience in that process. Thanks. <span style="background:#8FF;border:solid 1px;border-radius:8px;box-shadow:darkgray 4px 4px 4px;padding:1px 4px 0px 4px;">]&#124;]</span> 11:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
	As an outside editor, I have moved that this RFC/U be closed. If you wish to comment on the Motion to close, please do so ]. ] (]) 14:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
			== Nigerian Air Force ==
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 00:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
			Hi Jusdafax, I moved the content to "Accidents and Incidents" section.
	== ] ==
			It was formerly under "History" which shouldn't. It was not deleted.
	First off, when you say "Then there are the now-open agenda-pushers pursuing their anti-American or recentism slants", what or whom are you referring to? And in regards to this whole slow-down thing, if we were to take the break you want, most of the people would never come back. I've been following this and the Meta one for years; they don't get 15-20 people for any one time, and the times they get 5-10 are few and ''very'' far between. Which is why I'm making a lot of proposals right now (although it's worth noting that something like 95-97% of the list hasn't been touched by them). <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">]]]</span> 05:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
			But thanks for the heads up. ] (]) 01:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
	== Neitmi !vote AN ==
			*Copy that. Cheers! ] (]) 00:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
	Question - was your !vote on the last section in the WP:AN discussion on Neitmi sanctions an "Oppose" to both an interaction ban and civility parole, or just civility parole? I'm trying to close as accurately as possible.
			== G13 ==
	Thank you. ] (]) 21:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
			Hi Jusdafax, I've noticed that you have been tagging some user subpages marked with {{tl|User sandbox}} for deletion using {{tl|db-afc}}. Please note that ] only applies to userspace if it is tagged with {{tl|AFC submission}} or contains article wizard placeholder text only, and not to user sandboxes without the AFC template. Thank you. ]] 00:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
	*Hi GWH and thanks for your clarification note. My !vote was to oppose both in favor of Options 1, 2 and 3, as I had !voted above. The civility parole and interaction bans were attempts present alternatives to weaken sterner sanctions, which I feel are called for in this case. ]]] 01:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
			*Good to know, thanks. I've been looking into sandboxes over 6 months old which appear to be abandonded, or are just vandalism. What should I tag them with, using Huggle? ] (]) 00:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
	== Infoboxes ==
			:*If the sandboxes don't meet any of the speedy deletion criteria, they can simply be left untouched. There is ], but consensus there historically opposes deletion of harmless sandboxes just sitting around. ]] 01:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
			::*Seeing some interesting info at ] and still digging. ] (]) 01:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
	It looks like you messed with the Classical Music wikiproject. This insular group of editors has stonewalled the infobox issue for ''years'' against many users' objections and has fought to control the debate through canvassing, cementing it within their own nonbinding policy, and generally bullying those who disagree with them. If you keep it up they may even try to ban you from discussing the issue, as they have tried with Pigsonthewing in the past. Good luck dealing with them! ''']]]''' 17:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
			==] nomination of ]==
	*Thanks for the warning, but I got a clue from just one look at the J.S. Bach Talk page, which is why I filed my first-ever ANI report. For a number of reasons in the "real world" I decided to take a lengthy Wikibreak shortly afterwards. The funny thing here is I don't really care that much about the infoboxes or the lack thereof, but the vicious bullying offends me deeply, and I will be looking into this group in the future, as someone who sees civility as a core value to be taken seriously, which is why I assume it is one of the Five Pillars. Hopefully I raised enough dust to put this problem on the map. Thanks again for your note, which further confirms my impression of this problematic group of editors. ]]] 08:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
			]
			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Misplaced Pages's goals. Please note that ]. Under the ], such pages may be deleted at any time.
	== ITN - Welcome back - Thanks, but... ==
			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=User%3ASAIEWsaiew|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-notwebhost-notice -->
	Thanks for the welcome back. I wondered if anyone would notice.
			Really guy? Barely on Misplaced Pages for 24 hours and you request my user page be deleted? Come on guy! ] (]) 02:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
	Trouble is, I'm already bothered by the quality of discussion, just from that one post.
			*Really. I nominated your page and it was deleted by an administrator. Please review ] to understand Misplaced Pages's policies, which your User Page did not conform to. "Misplaced Pages is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site." ] (]) 03:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
	Immediately after I made my one an only post in eight months, we got another that said "'''Support''' International news. I prefer the blurb rather than the altblurb." And immediately after that, the item was posted, with the blurb rather than the altblurb.
			== Reverted edited back on 'Pope Francis' ==
	Now, that post I've quoted is precisely the kind of post that annoys me a lot. It's purely a vote. An "''I like it''" post. No reason was given to support the poster's opinion. Just an opinion. And given the sequence of comments before posting, it seemed to have a significant impact. So a vote, which we're not supposed to do here, rather than a reasoned piece of discussion, swung the day.
			Hello Jusdafax, this is ]. I have reverted my edit back on Pope Francis. The removal was intentional, as I have created the new page ], where all the content can be found. Thank you for the heads up though, I forgot to include a removal reason initially, which I have now done. ](]) 16:51, 31 October 2021 (PST)
	Obviously I'm not going to make any public fuss about this (hence this post), but I do have a question. While I've been away has there been any background discussion as to what constitutes a constructive post on ITN/C? I know that me pointing out what I thought were really crappy posts was one thing that annoyed some editors. (No doubt the creators of the crappy posts, at least, but that never bothered me.) Whether such a discussion supports my view here or not doesn't matter. It would help me to know, so that I can do the right thing. ] (]) 21:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
			*Fair enough, thanks. ] (]) 03:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
	*I have been away nearly two weeks, and am trying to get back to speed. We have had our differences, to say the least, but as I have commented elsewhere, the deep irony is that I often agree with your views. The answer to your question is beyond me at the moment. ITN is a real mess though, in my view. I will attempt to answer your question incisively in another day or two, I hope. And again, welcome back, quite sincerely. ]]] 09:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
			== Hi ==
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 13:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
			Saw that you commented on my page that has since been deleted ] (]) 06:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
	== Precious ==
			== Continued vandalism on Maccabean Revolt ==
	<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 )}} {{border-radius|1em}} border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix">
	<div>
	<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; background-color: #ddd; border: 5px solid #ddd; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}} {{border-radius|0.5em}}">]</div>
	'''soul music'''<br />
	Thank you for quality contributions for ], for fighting vandalism, for using your wording skills to raise ], - repeating: you are an ] {{nowrap|(9 September 2010)!}}
			An IP continues to vandalize ], despite your revert and mine :( ] (]) 03:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
	--] (]) 06:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
			*The IP has been blocked by an admin, thanks! ] (]) 05:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
	</div></div>
			== Precious anniversary ==
	Thank you, Gerda! ]]] 08:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
			{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Nine}} --] (]) 07:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
			Thank you kindly! Nine years sure goes by fast... cheers! ] (]) 07:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
			== LLVM ==
	:You are invited to share some ], --] (]) 07:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
			Acronyms should be publicly listed on the Internet.
	::Thanks again Gerda! ]]] 19:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
			The obfuscation of verbal technology (acronyms) is one of the events that helped collapsed the Roman empire.
			If you let people like LLVM and CVS declare "an acronym is no longer an acronym, because it suits us, and helps you forget we have a past," then infirmity is afoot!
			Change the site to list the original meaning and words behind LLVM! <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:::I started ] on the "hot" topic infobox, smiled a lot when I was faced with my personal history, - I was on both sides ;) --] (]) 19:45, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
			== Interested in Stephanie Cutter article? ==
	::: A year ago, you were the 451st recipient of my ''']]''' ]. - Last year we sang ], this year ], last fall ]. - Did you see the interview on project Germany, with a picture I took, in the last Signpost? (Link on my user page) --] (]) 11:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
			Hi Jusdafax, I saw that you were interested in biographies of political figures on WikiProject Biography. Would you have any interest in the requests I made of the ]? Though not an elected official, she's been in politics for a long time. In my requests I've done my best to use only top-tier sources and make requests within the rules of Misplaced Pages, so hopefully these requests are easy! I am trying to follow the conflict of interest process so I'm not making any of these edits myself. Please let me know if you're interested! ] (]) 17:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
	::: Two years ago ... - and ], --] (]) 08:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
			*Greetings. The entry you noticed was one I made back in 2016, and I'm currently staying out of politicians' articles except to revert vandalism or in some cases, unsourced material. I have now adjusted my entry accordingly. Thanks for thinking of me, however! Best wishes, ] (]) 15:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 01:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
			::You're very welcome! Thank you for letting me know! ] (]) 13:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 14:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
			==Disambiguation link notification for July 28==
	==Please comment on ]==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 12:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
			An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- (&nbsp;|&nbsp;)-->.
	== Thanks much ==
	Thank you for your kind words about my creation of new article, '']''. Much appreciated, &mdash; ''']''' (]) 06:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)		(].) --] (]) 09:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
			== It all makes sense now about my life ==
	==RFC/U on ]==
	You took part in a discussion that dealt with ], which took place ]. Based on that discussion, I started a ], ] (]) 02:55, 13 May 2013 (UTC)))
			I knew it! ] (]) 07:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
	== Vital Articles/Expanded talk page ==
			== Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment ==
	JDF, what is your reaction to the reorganizaed and reformatted VA/E talk page? I've reworked the top 65-70% of the talk page discussions, and plan to finish the remainder tonight. If you have any suggestions for improvement, I would like to incorporate them. My goal is to make it as simple, transparent and welcoming to new participants as possible. Regards, ] (]) 14:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
	*My first glance fills me with admiration! I have already added a few !votes and will be making more in the next few days. Many thanks! ]]] 22:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 03:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
	== Your comment ==
			== Fifteenth anniversary on Misplaced Pages! ==
	Hi Jusdafax. I have been reading through some old discussions, and I stumbled across one of your comments, to my regret. As I don't think I have ever told you how much your idiotic <!--(apologies, for lack of a better word)--> shocked me back then, I tell you now. ''At least'' you should have had the decency to answer there, when I asked you to justify your position, but no, you never bothered to, and that was despicable, in my opinion. You think you can just make whatever comments you like, and never be held accountable. That needs to change. Thanks, and have a nice day. ~ ] (]) 22:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
	*I stand by my comment, since socking, especially massive cases is a serious problem and must be dealt with. You got what you wanted with your unblock request, so coming here eight weeks later to insult and even arguably threaten me is over the top. As your now-unblocked friend ] put it: ''I VERY MUCH thank all who have supported me in the recent measures to unblock this account, and wish to assert that I bear no ill will to those who in good conscience have opposed my presence here and elsewhere, in various ways and for various reasons, believing themselves to be supportive of what they believe to be fair and just aims.'' If Kalki is over it, what is your problem? As for not replying, AN is not on my watchlist, and your assumption I deliberately did not answer is what is despicable, in my view. By coming to my Talkpage, and insulting me about a necro-thread in such a fashion, you breach ] and show a desire for ]. That is probably what ''should'' be "dealt with" and "needs to change." Your comments are noted, and '''I hereby request you stay off my talk page permanently''', becoming only the third such request I have made in my years as a volunteer editor here. Let's just agree to disagree, and let it go.]]] 23:10, 20 May 2013 (UTC))
			{{ombox
			| name = First Edit Day
			| image = ]
			| imageright = ]
			| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
			| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			| plainlinks = yes
			| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Jusdafax! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! 15th <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 12:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
			}}
			*Thank you, and also for the invite below... woo hoo! ] (]) 03:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
			== Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society ==
	== ITN thanks ==
			] Dear {{PAGENAME}},
			I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the ''']''', an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Misplaced Pages project for fifteen years or more. &#x200B;
	{{tmbox
	|tyle = notice
	|small =
	|image = ]
	|text = On 22 May 2013, ''''']''''' was updated with an item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the ].
	}}<!--Template:ITN notice--> --]<sup> ] ]</sup> 23:37, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
	Many thanks in return; the acknowledgement is quite appreciated. ]]] 23:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC))
			Best regards, <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 12:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
	== A cup of coffee for you! ==
			{{clear}} <!-- Template:Fifteen Year Society invitation -->
			*Hey thanks Chris! I will be honored to join you and the group, even though it makes me feel incredibly ancient. I never dreamed in 2007 I'd be here now. Cheers to you and the rest of the Society, and thanks again for the kindly invitation, which I truly appreciate! ] (]) 03:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | ''and here's to a summer of drama-free editing.''
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
	I'll drink to that! Have one for yourself amigo! ] ] ] 18:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
	|}
			<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>]
			Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
			From the ], ''''']''''' ] 13:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
	*Thank you kindly. So far our summer has been anything but drama-free, at least on some of the pages I edit and/or monitor. Perhaps matters will calm down. My very best wishes to you, where ever you edit here. ]]] 19:29, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
			</div>
			*Thank you kindly, it's certainly been a day for reflection about Misplaced Pages and my years of involvement here. I'm much obliged to you and the Birthday Committee! ] (]) 05:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
	==Disambiguation link notification for June 27==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			| name = First Edit Day
			| image = ]
			| imageright = ]
			| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
			| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			| plainlinks = yes
			| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Jusdafax! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ]<sup>]</sup> 20:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
			}}
			*Thanks Captain, and it's been an interesting experience to date, to say the least. I'm not sure I have another 15 years left in me, but the spirit is willing, despite some discouraging factors, and there are encouraging developments as well... and the Wiki-Love messages are encouraging, I must admit. It's nice to be acknowledged! ] (]) 05:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
			== 2006 in Iraq ==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC))		I removed two double links and fixed a redirect. Hope you understand. ] (]) 22:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
			*First off, you are editing without using edit summaries, as the edit screen clearly requests where it says "Briefly describe your changes." Doing so is important because it helps vandal patrollers like myself to understand your intent. Secondly, seeing that your second edit to the article left the sentence you edited incomplete, I found good reason to revert your edits. I hope you will learn from this experience, since you started editing Misplaced Pages less than a week ago, and use edit summaries from now on, as well as make an effort to edit the encyclopedia competently by reviewing your edits before publishing them, as well as afterwards. Thank you. ] (]) 22:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
			*:So are you going to honor my edit and revert your revert of my edit? ] (]) 03:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
			*::I have now fixed the entry for March as noted in my edit summary, and, since I see in your edit history that you have yet to do so, again remind you that making edit summaries saves your fellow editors time and effort. ] (]) 03:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
			== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
	==Vital folk music==
	The only reason I started taking an interest in the vital list was because of the fact that the list of folk and country musicians doesn't include a single non-American artist. All of the maneuvers I have tried to add any artist or folk tradition from outside of the US has been opposed by you, mostly without offering rationales - or simply by saying that we shouldn't add names now that we're trying to cut down - yet you vote to keep American names like Joan BAez on the list (who is neither known as a musician or a composer but as Bob Dylan's one time girl friend), you even vote to keep even Les paul who is not even known as a folk/Country artist but as an instrument maker. Now I want to ask you: Do you really think that it is possible that there isn't a single artist or folk music tradition from outside of the US that is vital? Who would you add if you had to add one or two folk artists from outside of the US? And finally don't you consider it to be the case that non-Western or non-US musical traditions should expect some kind of representation? I simply don't understand why people are opposed to globalizing the music section. Especially not the folk section. I don't get it.] 22:13, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	*My Misplaced Pages brutha, this list can never possibly satisfy everyone, and we have to accept that we will win some and lose some. When I feel there is an injustice, I have learned to just walk away for a while. Now, saying "Dylan's one time girlfriend" shows me you don't know or choose to ignore that Baez broke ground for, and help popularize, Dylan. Baez was and is a huge symbol of the peace movement, so much so that popular cartoonist Al Capp caricatured her as "Joanie Phoanie" over her views. Vital? Fits my definition. Fairport Convention, not so much, despite their long history and discography, and though I rarely discuss my personal life here, just so you know I did go so far as to ask my girlfriend, who is not American, if she had ever heard of FC. She had not. As for Les Paul... dude, read the history of the guy. He arguably ''invented'' the electric guitar and multitrack recording. As for music, he had a big series of smash music hits with three number one songs, with one of them, 'How High the Moon' in the Grammy Hall of Fame. He has his own ''permanent exhibit'' in the Rock Hall of Fame. Genres in the late 40's - early 50's were mixed up, so he is termed "country" for lack of a better placement. And to top it off Les Paul ''invented the harmonica rack'' which in some ways made folk music as we know it possible. I prefer not to go into combat on my talk page, which is cluttered enough already, but I am responding here since I sense your concern, and also we are ITN editors. If you insist, please continue this back on the Vital list talk page, but let's not argue my views and !votes here, thanks. And if you want my advice, try adding Donovan, who was in my view much more influential than FC. Just see if you can nominate something else to delete. Maybe I'll support, maybe not. Best wishes, ]]] 23:28, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
	::Your definition of Vital is to have been caricatured by Al Capp. That kinds of put the non-American world at a disadvantage. I don't know any folk musicians who could name a single song by Baez, and I move a lot in folk music circles in the US and Europe. Some of them might have heard one of her Dylan Covers. I also don't know any European folk musicians who wouldn't know Fairport, Planxty or the Dubliners. The Grammy and Rock n Roll hall of fame are American halls of fame - its like winning the World Series - utterly parochial.] 23:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
	:::You ignore most of my points to focus on a few, ignore my attempt at advice, and return to argue against my wishes. So be it. My editing time is often limited and I prefer to use it otherwise. '''Please do not post on this page again.''' You are now one of only four editors in my nearly six years here that I have made this request of. ]]] 23:56, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
	== removing others' comments ==
			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	If you wish to add your link at the Crats Noticeboard, kindly do so without removing others' comments. Thank you. <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid darkgreen;margin-top:1px;bottom:1px;font-verdana;background:lightblue" > ] ]</span></small> 22:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
	*My apologies, as your comment was inadvertently removed by accident when I was creating a Wiki-link. I see you reverted so I will recreate the link but more carefully this time. Again, sorry about that. ]]] 23:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
	:: Thanks for the clarification. Regards -- <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid darkgreen;margin-top:1px;bottom:1px;font-verdana;background:lightblue" > ] ]</span></small> 23:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
			If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
	== Adminship ==
			</div>
	Hello Jusdafax, I'm not sure if you've ever been asked this, but are you interested in becoming an administrator? Have you ever had an RfA in the past? I would need to do further research, but I am considering making an RfA for you. --] (]) 20:01, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1124425182 -->
			== Seasons Greetings ==
	*First off, and most importantly, please allow me to thank you. ''I view your interest as a profound complement'', and am honored by your consideration. I in September 2010, have never requested the tools and currently lean against the idea of an Rfa, but am frankly curious: what led you to me? Thanks again, and best wishes, ]]] 23:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
			{| style="width: 80%; margin: 4px auto; padding: .2em; border: 4px solid #F00; background-color: #46CB18;"
	*:Well, to tell you the truth, I stumbled upon your oppose on ] and happened to find it quite harsh, no ] intended. I was curious as to what type of user you were and found that you have made numerous contributions, been helpful to other users (evident on your talk page), but aren't an administrator. This made me consider the different reasons why you may not be administrator, which lead to my asking you about your situation in terms of adminship. You seemed good-willed, but I wanted to hear about "the back story," so to speak. Just to make sure (before I do personal research), would you be willing to be a Misplaced Pages administrator? --] (]) 01:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
			|align="left"|]
			|align="center"|<font color="white">'''Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, ] (]) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}}'''
			|align="right"|]
			|} ] (]) 04:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
			== Happy New Year, Jusdafax! ==
	I'm puzzled, how can my oppose be considered "quite harsh?" It reads: '''Oppose - per above opposes. I thank the candidate for their work and willingness to serve as an admin, but many of the concerns expressed convince me to oppose this Rfa.''' As for a run for adminship for myself, as I say above, I tilt against an Rfa at this time. You might try reviewing ] where I had some involvement back in 2010. In brief, I find it a significant failing of the project that the editing community is entrusted to make admins, but not unmake them. ]]] 02:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">
	:Oh well, anyways. Nice talking to you; see you around on Misplaced Pages. Please contact me on ] if you need anything. --] (]) 02:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
			]]
	::Thanks, likewise! ]]] 07:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
			{{Paragraph break}}
			{{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}}
			'''Jusdafax''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
			<br /><span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 04:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)<br /><br />
			</div>
			&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
			{{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> <span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 04:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
			==Thank you ...==
	* FWIW, I would support an RfA for Jusdafax! ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 21:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
			.. for having the courage to speak up at ANI. And I agree with what you said about comments at ITN/C. – ] (]) 00:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
	** Well now that is mighty kind indeed, Gabe, considering I !voted against yours and DL's as well. Just for laughs I used and came up with , but at present am simply not inclined to ask for the tools. Perhaps in the fall I'll reconsider; I thank you for your endorsement! ]]] 03:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
			:And thanks again today. -- ] (]) 15:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
	== July 15: WP:VA/E ==
			::...you are welcome. I just took a look, and I see it's turned into a pile-on. My advice now is to drop the appeal and work elsewhere on the 'pedia. Give it a longer time like six months or a year. Work on articles and subjects that interest you, get some good article creation/expansion work done, or perhaps tackle the humble but highly needful field of vandal patrolling, where help is always needed. Keep it low stress, make the Wiki better, and you will get the block lifted down the road. Here's to a happier 2023... Best Wishes! ] (]) 04:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
	Hey Jusdafax, there are currently a couple of dozen removal threads that are one or two !votes away from consensus. I hope you can make the time to go through the threads soon and add your !vote and/or thoughts. Cheers! ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 22:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
			== Can you email me? ==
	* Hey Jusdafax. I just wanted to touch base with you regarding the recent proposal to significantly reduce the ''Regions'' sub-list at ]. My concern here is that IMO, ] will do his very best to block or stall-out the proposal as he is already showing signs of doing that. Also, since ] and ] have, at this point, decided to remain neutral on the matter, I could really use some leadership from you, since I don't want argue this out ''ad infinitum'' with PbP. My suspicion, though admittedly bad-faith, is that PbP would rather control the content of the list than he would reduce the list to 10,000 or less entries. Same with ], whom I suspect enjoys his numerous swap proposals more than reducing the list to our goal. Also, I very strongly feel that I cannot count on the support of either Carl or PbP, so without their two support !votes and with a recently reduced participation rate, well&nbsp;... I could really use some help from you in terms of getting this done. Are you willing to work with me to accomplish this task, or should I reconsider my efforts? Cheers! ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 19:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
	**What the...? I ''supported'' chopping ~100 regions and still do, I merely oppose the first draft of the regions that are being kept because it needs work. And I don't know where you're getting the idea that I don't want to get the list down to 10,000. If you look at the proposals I've made since the first of the year and the edits I made to the VA/E pages since then, I feel they're not only hard to argue with, but they keep the list right-sized. When regions is cut to 100 and some of the other proposals made in the last few weeks come to fruition, we will be pretty close to being around 10,000 articles. Maybe even under. Just because I don't support every single removal doesn't mean I don't support getting it back to 10,000. I just want it to be the ''right'' 10,000 articles. <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">]]]</span> 19:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
	*** The ''right'' 10,000? Like ] and ], right? Anyway, the only reason that I mentioned you here was for the interests of full-disclosure, not because I wanted this thread to turn into ''yet another'' Gabe vs. PbP drama fest. I've already had more than enough arguing with you and would prefer if you just kept a respectful distance. I.e., assuming good-faith is NOT a suicide pact and if you want to cut the list then '''help''' don't hinder; actions speak louder than words, etcetera. ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 20:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
	*** FTR, 2 days ago ] said: ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 20:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
			You're not email-able here. Happy editing! ] ] ] 13:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
	* For an example of what I am talking about regarding PbP, please see . ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 00:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
	* . ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 02:29, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
			Hi Atsme! I assure you my listed email works, because I get a steady supply of WP-bot notifications there. Are you sending to jusdafax.wikipedia@gmail.com ? ] (]) 14:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
	The beauty of the regional articles deletion concept was that it would get us down to, or close to, 10k articles on the list as it is supposed to be. That would reduce the amount of time needed to go through the seemingly endless deletion, swap or even add proposals. I'll take a look in a bit, as I have a few other things I want to work on, and frankly, the amount of time and energy being expended here makes my eyes glaze over. ]]] 04:17, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
	:A cursory look down at the bottom of the talk page appears to indicate that most of the issues have been worked out, unless I am mistaken. I would tentatively endorse the regional "keep" list though I have not gone over it carefully. ]]] 22:57, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
			:???? - sent to the addy you gave. I think you have to activate it in your preferences, maybe? ] ] ] 16:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
	== March Against Monsanto ==
			::Right. Try it now. ] (]) 16:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
	On the one hand, it is true that I nominated the article for deletion when it was in very poor shape. On the other hand, after four days, when it was a much better article, I requested early closure that so the AFD could be closed as a speedy keep. I am not trying to get the article deleted again, but would like to get the edit warring to stop. ] (]) 22:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
			== Englewood, Kansas ==
	:Thank you for closing the ANI, however, although the original poster, ] (and me) both thought the discussion was pretty finished, if you read the opening of the ANI, the OP asked for action with respect to the accusations being made, mostly by ] as the discussion in the ANI made clear; your closure did not address that. Several editors, including me, said that they were driven off the page by his/her vitriol, and I think it would be useful if you addressed the original concern in your closing. Would you please reconsider the closing to address the reason the ANI was opened? Thank you. ] (]) 15:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
	:: I just saw that you left a light warning for V in - thanks for that. Still, it would be useful if your closing mentioned that you did that. I know admin/closings are hard but they should generally address the reason the ANI was opened, yes? Thanks. ] (]) 15:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
	:::For what it's worth, ], I'm very content with the closing statement just the way it is. I'm going to write a more nuanced and detailed explanation of what I mean by that on my own user talk. --] (]) 17:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
	::::Thanks, I'll respond there. ] (]) 18:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
			Englewood, KS is a ghost town. The population used to be in the hundreds and is now less than 100. The source was already provided in the article. I would ask that you please re-instate the edit I made. ] (]) 23:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
	== Vital Articles ==
			*According to the U.S. Census in the second sentence of the article, the population is 58, which is indeed under 100. The Misplaced Pages article ] is inconclusive on a definition. I'm declining your request both as a courtesy to the remaining residents and more importantly a matter of my deferring to the online : "a town that no longer has any people living in it : an abandoned town." You are free, of course, to contest my reasoning on the article Talk page and see if you can get a consenus. ] (]) 00:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
	'''To all editors displaying the "Vital Articles" template on their User Page.'''
			== Always precious ==
	Hi,
			]
			Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 06:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
			:Thanks again. I appreciate it, if after a delay since your post. ] (]) 10:46, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
			== ''SmallCat dispute'' case opened ==
	I recently tried to make a change to the list of Level 3 Vital Articles by replacing the entry
	:"<code><nowiki> ]</nowiki></code>"
	with a new replacement article
	:"<code><nowiki> ]</nowiki></code>".
	Although I have advertised the proposed change on ], I had no response and an anonymous IP editor took it upon himself to undo my changes on grounds that my proposal did not have a "strong consensus".
			You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at ]. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at ]. '''Please add your evidence by August 4, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, ]. For a guide to the arbitration process, see ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ] <sup>'']'' &#124; '']''</sup> 13:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
	Will you please look at the discussion ] and add your opinion.
			<!-- Message sent by User:Dreamy Jazz@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat_dispute/Update_list&oldid=1166423161 -->
			== Proposed decision posted for the ''SmallCat dispute'' case ==
	] (]) 20:32, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
			The ] in the ] has been posted. You are invited to review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ] <sup>'']'' &#124; '']''</sup> 10:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
	== One of the most random talk page responses you will ever receive ==
			<!-- Message sent by User:Dreamy Jazz@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat_dispute/Update_list&oldid=1171817997 -->
			== Apologies ==
	This is too off topic to post on the ITNC page (and that's saying something!). But in response to your comment about the way RD has evolved, I would simply make the point that . You are right: RD appears to have evolved in that way, but there are some notable exceptions. The world's oldest person is generally a full blurb or nothing, for instance. —]— <sub>''']'''</sub> 19:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
	:You correctly perceive my reservations. Some deaths that would have been blurbs now struggle to make an RD mention, others fall through the cracks. It seems to be about who cares enough to put a substantial update in the subject's article. I was against the RD concept, but in all candor it sometimes allows a relative unknown, like Jack Vance, to get on the main page where they might not have at all. So it's not all bad, but I think I preferred the pre-RD era, all things considered. ]]] 22:23, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
			I didn't read your edit carefully at ] and assumed it was for ] – thanks for reverting my error. ] (]) 17:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
			*All good. Deadshot78 appears to be a problem editor, and a record of their doings will help keep track of their questionable edits. Thanks for your note, and best wishes! ] (]) 17:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 42496 --> ] (]) 14:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>]
			Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
			From the ], ''''']''''' ] 05:58, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
	== Welcome to STiki! ==
			</div>
			*Thank you, I appreciate thinking back to those innocent days. Cheers! ] (]) 06:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
	Hello, Jusdafax, and '''welcome to STiki'''! Thank you for ] using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
	*''']''', including:
	**''']'''
	**''']'''
	*''']'''
	Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
	* ''']''' - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
	* ''']''' - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!
	We hope you enjoy maintaining Misplaced Pages with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at ] and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! {{#if: ||] (developer) and}} -- <span class="nowrap">] ]<sup> ]</sup></span> 05:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|}
			== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
	Okay, I will stop that now, but you've got to admit it was pretty funny! (] (]) 10:33, 1 August 2013 (UTC))
			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	== ] ==
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	. We can, I'm sure, agree to disagree over the posting by Secret; in my mind that's secondary to the knee-jerk calls for desysopping which you comment addresses perfectly. At the risk of breaching ] in letter (but not in spirit) this has made its way to ]. Sigh. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">]&nbsp;:&nbsp;] </span></small> 10:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
	*Thanks Pedro. For the record I opposed Secret's request to get the tools back, and now it is this. I appreciate the notice about AN, and am on my way. ]]] 11:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
			If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
	== ] edit war ==
			</div>
	], ], and ] I hope you come and discuss the reasons for the edits you made during edit war you conducted, so when the lockdown is over we can go back to editing productively and collaboratively. I created a ] for the discussion. I am copying this note to all your Talk pages. Thanks! ] (]) 14:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
			</div>
	*I frankly take exception your use of the term "edit war" regarding my two edits. I saw a sentence that seemed way out of line as presented in the article lead, and deleted it on the grounds I cited in the edit summary. I was reverted by MM on what seemed to me thin reasoning, so I reverted back and, in fact, asked MM in my second edit summary to take it to the Talk page. Again, that is twice that I edited the article, in total. When MM, instead of discussing as I had requested, merely reverted me again, I was done, but shortly afterward editor II reverted. At that point an admin came in and, in my view, over-reacted by closing the article to all editing for three days or so. I know none of these editors including the admin, and had never edited the article previously. Again, I reject your characterization of my two edits as part of an "edit war" that I "conducted." Your invitation is noted, and I will give it my consideration. ]]] 15:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 -->
	:Sorry you object! It was an edit war by definition ("An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions, rather than trying to resolve the disagreement by discussion."); it is true that nobody broke ] when the page was locked down. Nobody followed ]. I was unhappy to see you all deleting/reverting and talking past each other in edit notes and that none of you came to Talk, which is why I took the time to invite you all. In any case, thanks for considering the invitation. Best regards, ] (]) 15:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
	**Again, I find a disturbing lack of clarity in your characterization. My two edit summaries clearly show that on my second of two edits, I directly asked MM not to revert again, but take it to the article talk page. Instead of doing so, he chose to revert again and mimic my comment back at me. You now characterize me as "talking past" when I was the one who first asked for a Talk page discussion, so I ''again'' must dispute your post to my Talk page. The language of your "apology" above is also of interest... "Sorry you object!" Hm. ]]] 15:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
	::What is not clear in my characterization? It indeed happened, that "editors who disagreed about the content of a page repeatedly overrode each other's contribution." 5 deletions/reversions occurred in rapid succession. Btw, under ] it is the initial bold editor, who, upon reversion, is supposed to stand down and bring the issue to Talk. That would be you, in this situation. I also wish the other two editors would have stood down and brought the issue to Talk - they didn't either. As for "talking past each other" - the brief format of an edit note pretty much demands declarative statements - it is not a format for discussion and reaching consensus - hence yes, limiting 'discussion' to edit notes generally means talking past one another instead of to each other; that was my read of what happened. But this is not a huge deal - the admin stepped in and shut this down before anybody broke 3RR, and I am not accusing you of any violation of policy or pillar (nobody crossed ], nobody accused someone else of bad faith, etc). So I don't understand what is at stake for you in this meta-discussion. I just wanted to invite you to discuss the issue in dispute in Talk while the page is in lockdown, in hopes we can resolve it and be ready to move on when the lockdown is over. Thanks again. ] (]) 16:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
	== Asking about your comment ==		== talk page semi-protected ==
			Hi there,
	I'm glad that the latest ANI discussion has closed, and I just want to ask you about your last comment there, the one about there being much to ponder. With most users, I wouldn't bother to ask, but I'm asking here. You said very clearly that you weren't criticizing anyone in particular, but an adverse side-effect of saying that is it can leave some of us wondering exactly what you meant. The opening of the thread listed a long series of diffs, some of them mine, and accused them of being disruptive; I subsequently tried to explain that I'm quite sure that the content was not OR, and that the combined efforts of me and several other editors reflected something that was at least approaching consensus, rather than tag teaming or the like. You said, right after I had discussed my role with another editor, that you were concerned that civility can mask deeper issues. I'm reading between the lines that maybe you were arguing that the now-blocked editor actually had a valid point, that some (all?) of the editors in the diffs (including me? not including me?) were actually engaged in some sort of POV-pushing, going beyond the garden-variety differences of opinion between editors, and that it had been overlooked because we had mostly been civil about it, but that there should still be scrutiny that was failing to happen. I hope that you remember that I have said that I, too, am watching very carefully for anyone who displays signs of "shill" editing, and that I am opposed to it, if it actually happens. So I'd like to ask: did I understand the intent of your comment correctly? Do you have any issues with my edits here? Do you think that I misunderstand anything? Did you find my attempted explanation about OR unconvincing or incorrect? --] (]) 17:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
			I'm a new user and I wanted to post 2 very recent articles to David Grusch talk page to be discussed, but it was semi-protected. I was wondering if you can post it there instead:
			1. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/12/us/politics/ufos-aliens-classified-briefing.html https://archive.is/CTvNC
	*I am attempting to engage Viriditas on his Talk page. I hold you blameless, if it matters, and Viriditas obviously blew it on his overall demeanor, which, given his block record, wasn't too sharp. As to the substance of his claims, I reserve judgment. I am unfamiliar with much of the controversy, and have done very little editing in this field, but have started a bit of research. The post just above shows that I recently twice attempted to pull a sentence out of a Monsanto-related article, a sentence I felt was clearly unencyclopedic and slanted the article with undue weight as presented. I feel the results are of interest, though hardly conclusive. To make claims that a Misplaced Pages editor is POV-pushing is serious, and to say multiple editors are is obviously dangerous. Aside from his demeanor, Viriditas was fighting hard to make some points. I have known him as a Wikipedian for years, and have tended to respect him on the issues. Now that he is tarnished goods, many editors may dismiss him and move on, but as I say I'd like to cautiously discuss the actual issues with him on his Talk page, assuming he can do so in a civil manner. In my view, further research is needed. Thanks for caring about my concerns, and best wishes. ]]] 23:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
	::Thanks. I think that I may have seen one editor who showed up as an SPA and who might have been a "shill" (and not someone on that list of diffs, by the way), and I'm continuing to watch for that very closely – but I really think that most of the users who might be targets of suspicion may be opinionated and sometimes stubborn, but that doesn't make for bad faith. If you come to think that there is something that I have failed to realize, please draw it to my attention. I'm watching the discussion on his talk with an open mind, and I appreciate the way that you framed it there. --] (]) 23:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
	:FWIW, Viriditas was right, especially about the very twisted and difficult to spot (understatement) web of role-playing. I appreciate that someone is looking into this and is willing to accept new information however uncomfortable it most likely will be. Thank you, JustDaFax. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 23:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
	::''Information'' is very useful. Accusations and insinuations like Viriditas and Petrarchan are making is destructive and just plain ugly. Say hello, Joe McCarthy. Were there communist spies in America? You bet. Did he go after ''everyone not like him'', recklessly and with no sense of decency? That is the company V and P are keeping. That is where this has already gone. Ugly. ] (]) 02:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
	:::Why in the world would you refer to this as an accusation, jtydog? Let me tell you something, pondering ] might be a good idea. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 02:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
	:::In all seriousness... to freak out or try and squelch conversations is a giant red light. And that isn't an accusation, i've been holding my tongue on this one for sooooo long. Don't attack the people calling for transparency. Don't use tactics that shills are known to use. Chill out and don't care so much, this is just an encyclopedia, and we are all just sharing a bit of our free time to help bring info to the People. If editors are entangled in a bunch of BS instead of being allowed to edit as normal, they are going to get upset. We are human beings. I WILL speak my mind and no one has a right to ask me to shut up or to not share articles and information. I won't be intimidated. And seriously, who in the world has time for all these noticeboards and talk page therapy sessions? I mean, i have two jobs, a life to run, and a bit of time in the evenings, sometimes more sometimes much less... So interference with my good faith, good editing is not going to be met with kisses and hugs. I am a human being and I am not interested in dealing with bullshit. That's all there is to it. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 03:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
	::::The conspiracy-spinning that V engaged in on his Talk page, '''which you praised here''', is disgusting. "And when you take the big picture POV, this appears to have been coordinated by what can only be described as the "fringe cabal", a group of editors who target articles they believe pose a challenge to mainstream science and/or the supporting corporatist-scientific complex. Within this group of editors you have certain personalities who almost seem to be role playing: one plays the hardline extremist who refuses to compromise, the other plays the good cop, while another plays the bad cop, still another plays the curious academic and another plays the GMO proponent." He is thinking of specific people there, and I am likely one of them, as he has accused me directly before. It is ugly. Ugly. And has consequences. There are editors like ], with whom I have never interacted before, who came out guns blazing at me that I was all COI. Gee, where did that come from? I would say, from all these wild accusations you and V and others are throwing around. You, Petrarchan, are helping build up this conspiracy thing, and I have not done a damn thing wrong. I have seen what you have written about me on various Talk pages. I too am a human being and that felt like shit. I am not paid, I am not a shill. ''I just think differently than you.'' I am working on Misplaced Pages to help the People too. You have no monopoly on wanting to do good. And yes it is another round of McCarthyism. Writ small, for sure. But the same ugly thing, here in our Wiki-world. Please speak your mind on CONTENT and leave me out of it. Otherwise, bring it up in a COI noticeboard, where it is appropriate under Wiki policies and leave the personal attacks out of Talk pages already. ] (]) 05:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
			2. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/jan/14/what-happens-if-we-have-been-visited-by-aliens-lied-to-ufos-uaps-grusch-congress ] (]) 22:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
	== CREWE ==
			*I have restored your post here, which I was startled to see was deleted without my knowledge. Now it appears you have been blocked for socking, a serious offense on Misplaced Pages. However, I appreciate the heads up on the NYT article, which I have not read. I’ll try to take a look at it. This topic, UFO’s/UAP’s, is quite contentious both on Misplaced Pages and worldwide, and in my view dubious tactics are in play by various parties. I strongly suggest you refrain from further sockpuppet activity. If you establish a record of good contributions on other WikiMedia projects, you may be able to succeed in appealing your block down the road. Best wishes, ] (]) 23:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
	Hi there, JustDaFax (love the name),
	Glanced at your recent notes to Viriditas, about getting the creeps when considering certain observations, and I wanted to share something indeed creepy. BP was caught writing their own article, with 'independent' editors inserting the material for the resident BP COI talk page PR rep (all very wiki legal). This hit the media and wound up on Jimbo's page. It came out during those discussions (or maybe it was on related talk pages at the time, probably SlimVirgin's) that there is a group called CREWE setup to aid company's PR departments to influence their pages on wiki. They organize through a Facebook page that has over 400 members - composed of wiki editors hip to the idea of spreading PR for some odd reason ($?). This needs to sink in deeply with every editor interested in saving the project from corporate propaganda. Even with this exposed, and one editor admitting to working for that group, the overall consensus, including Jimmy's, was that this is a good thing for the wiki, resulting in more accurate articles. (Do an Internet search for "CREWE, Misplaced Pages"; I believe the article about this group is on "Motherboard").
	Thank you for being. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 22:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
	: '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 00:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
	::An arts and cultural magazine, they'll have all the facts in there. Right? BP was not caught editing their own article, the editor disclosed he was working for BP, it's in his god damn name. Utter nonsense and misinformation. Be wary of the conspiratorial ideation that also plagues the global warming denialers. ] (]) 00:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
	:::Nicely played (except for the manic feel and misspellings) -- a) slam/discredit message and source; b) pull out the "conspiracy" label (as if they NEVER EVER happen); c) throw the messenger in with climate change deniers or something similar, for good measure.
	:::CREWE is a fact, and the Misplaced Pages community discussed it's existence open, public forums, including Jimbo's talk page. What a strange thing to jump all over me for. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 02:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
	:::'Caught" may be the wrong term, but here's what happened: '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 02:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
	::::Petrarchan47, if you find a similar link about Monsanto instead of about BP, I'd really like to know about it. But if you (and Jusdafax) will let me give you a bit of sincere advice here, the best approach for you to take is to raise these issues at places like ], but '''not''' on article talk pages where editors are discussing article content. --] (]) 14:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
			== Notification: Feedback request service is down ==
	== Re: Recent commentary here ==
			Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}
	After a short Wiki-break I am a bit surprised to find a couple disputatious threads regarding the Monsanto article(s). I will study this all carefully but have nothing to say at the present moment, aside from the fact that I continue, as I have said for years, to feel that paid editing is something I am strongly against. It's not clear to me what is going on and it appears considerable study will be required to become reasonably informed. My best wishes to all editors. ]]] 09:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
	:JustDaFax, I appreciate your gentle comments here. I noticed that you had said some positive things about one of the main editors of MAM, so i am very confused now. I worked very hard today tending to the MAM article, only to have ''all'' my work reverted, including the simplest of things like a little intro to the background of the movement, and a proper use of RS. is the edit, if you want a view of what Viriditas and I have had to deal with at this article. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 23:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
			You may have noticed that you have not received any messages from the ] for over a month. {{noping|Yapperbot}} appears to have stopped delivering messages. Until that can be resolved, please ] pages that interest you, such as ].
	::] as per the note I just left for you and Canoe , these notes approach or perhaps amount to ], which is disruptive behavior. Please stop. Thanks. ] (]) 23:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
			<small>This notification has been sent to you as you are subscribed to the ].</small> - ] (]) 08:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
	:::. So you just stop, please.] This is too much for editors to deal with on their own, we have proven that. The very same group who edit warred for months, is the same group in charge of the article now - with the same problems and games. Wholesale reversions, especially right at the 3RR point, and i am told to go get permission from said group, this group is using cherry-picking, OR and SYNTH with completely straight faces, and i am the only one speaking out, and trying to fix it. It is too much for me, and i don't have the time to edit this page towards NPOV any more. We are stuck trying to get the basic facts on the page, while we are not allowed to add any references about protesters and researchers who question GMOs, but a list of 5 "GMOs are super safe for sure" refs to unrelated websites sits high on the page. I think the violations of the guidelines are very obvious, and since this movement is not a convoluted story, this could be handed over to ArbCom for a quick fix. I guess this is me, begging you or anyone out there, to please help get this article to ArbCom. Thank you very much. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 00:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
			<!-- MMS delivery requested by User:WhatamIdoing at Special:Permalink/1199910865#RFC notifications bot down -->
	::::Jtdog, Petrarchan47 is welcome to post on my page any time. Your statement appears to be an attempt at intimidation, which I resent for both Petrarchan and myself. ]]] 00:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:WhatamIdoing/MassMessage&oldid=1199913358 -->
			== Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment ==
	:::::Thanks for your note Jusdafax. As I have mentioned here and elsewhere, ] has been engaging in this behavior - going on the Talk pages of users he/she believes are sympathetic, and making these kinds of unfounded accusations against me and other editors - for quite some time, and I have had it with being bad-mouthed. That is one issue -- the other one is the more garden-variety of canvassing about specific article content. I am not even editing or watching the MaM article, as I already was fed up with Viriditas' behavior there. In any case, informing these users that their behavior is outside guidelines is not intimidation - it is fair warning. The next time the behavior happens - if it happens again - I am indeed going to start an ANI. I really have had it. There are appropriate ways to deal with perceived COI and going around on user Talk pages and article Talk pages and making these accusations is not among those ways. I tell you - ''I feel persecuted''. That matters too. Paid editing is an issue but that doesn't mean that everyone who disagrees with you is a paid editor. I could start (and I am not!!) going around and writing everywhere that P is an employee or paid PR person for Greenpeace, right? He/she ''must'' be because of the positions that P takes in these articles about environmental issues! But I am NOT going there. And neither should P. Otherwise it is wild McCarthyism - slapping people who disagree with you with a label so you can dismiss them. Just the facts indeed! No more of this personal attack based on 100% speculation. ] (]) 00:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
	::::::So, it appears you are saying I am calling you a paid editor and you are mocking my name? Your remarks and demeanor on my page are truly extraordinary. ]]] 00:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 07:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
	::::::::No, I am not saying that you are calling me a paid editor!! I am sorry you misunderstood. It is hard to control tone in writing. I am saying that with no basis in fact, P has been canvassing around, calling me and others COI/paid editors -- including here on your page, and trying to make you an ally. You have not engaged in that behavior that I have ever seen. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I did play off your name, saying that there are no facts to support these allegations with respect to me, and I have said explicitly on more than one occasion that I have no relationship with Monsanto or any of the other ag biotech companies. Their ''only'' basis for these accusations are the consistent positions that I have taken, which are simply ''different than theirs.'' Again I apologize for the misunderstanding. Really. I have no desire to offend anybody -- I just want the attacks to stop already. I am sorry that you were dragged into this. Your actions have been totally appropriate with respect to your own approach - you have expressed concern about COI editing, and written that the issue needs to be handled with thought and care. Again, I apologize for the misunderstanding. ] (]) 01:36, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
			== Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment ==
	*Petrarchan47, as we see Misplaced Pages is under considerable pressure, as I see it, from forces that are interested in seeing information presented in the way that they want it perceived. How to safely identify such forces can be problematic, but it seems likely to me that they exist here. Your edit is of value, and I agree that this article is being watched with near-obsessive interest. But here is the great thing, all edits are recorded and the history preserved. Consensus can change. With Viriditas blocked, the MAM article is likely to be "scrubbed." I have a great respect for Viriditas that comes from years of interaction, and I think he was making points that deserved consideration. The larger issues are fascinating to me, including the very strong possibility that Monsanto has targeted the MAM article. It is only logical to assume this, given the PR value and Monsanto's power. If this is true, sooner or later a whistle blower may step forward. Clearly the confrontational and arguably uncivil methods Viriditas was using are dangerous, as his three-month block shows. But the issues are much much bigger than this one article. The main Monasanto article, the GMO controversies article where I see you are active, the Glyphosate article where I made two edits that drew reverting, and hundreds if not thousands of others, are places where slant and information inclusion are debatable. I continue to mull over the direction I should take, but I was encouraged by a statement made by Jimmy Wales at the recent Wikimania. My comment to that is at ] currently. You might want to post your concerns at Jimmy's page, and see if he responds. If nothing else, you may find like-minded editors. I will continue to monitor the situation, and contemplate it. I salute you. ]]] 00:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
	::A deep bow to you, my friend. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 02:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
	:::Note: i am very much not involved in any other articles that touch on the GMO issue, by design. I may have made a couple edits months ago, but not since or before. You might be thinking of someone else? Also, i made pretty cryptic remarks on Jimbo's page, do feel free to let me know if you think it would be prudent to elaborate at all. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 05:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
	:::Ah, I see I misread you. I read this as "drop by and comment" at Jimbo's talk, but you were suggesting to maybe list concerns in a new section for him. I'm not feeling like getting much more involved, and have really been trying pull away entirely from the matter. But I will ponder this... '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 08:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
	Jusdafax, I just wanted to weigh in to say that I saw your comments in the Jimbo talk page and agree. If you have any ideas on dealing with paid editing please keep me in the loop. ] (]) 16:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 05:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
	== ANI ==
			== A ] for you! ==
	] Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
	:I see I am not directly involved, but thanks for this notice. ]]] 19:50, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
	::You are welcome. I notified you just because I mentioned you and agree that you are not directly involved. Sorry to trouble you.] (]) 23:01, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 44186 --> ] (]) 02:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
	==My recent RfA==
	I should have said thanks for your support sooner. ```]<small>]</small> 03:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
	== ] ITN ==
	Hey Jusdafax. I see that you changed the status of the ] ITNC to needs update. I've added a results table and some prose regarding the post-election. Could you have another look at the article and, if you think it meets the update requirements, change to ready? Cheers! —] (]) 16:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
	*I see the article is now posted. Thanks for your help! ]]] 02:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
	==Congratulations from STiki!==
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92; width: 100%;"
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 7.5px;" | ]
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 10px; height: 1.5em;" |
	{{Center|'''The Anti-Vandalism + ] Barnstar'''}}
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 7.5px;" | ]
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
	Congratulations, Jusdafax! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the '''{{#if: 1,000|1,000|1,000}}'''<!-- Here goes the classification threshold --> classification threshold using ]. We thank you both for ] to Misplaced Pages at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the ] and stay in touch at the ]. Thank you and keep up the good work! {{#if: ||] (developer) and}} ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 05:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
	|}
	== Please comment on ] ==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 2043 --> ] (]) 00:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
	== Could you help me please? ==
	Hi jusdafax!
	I would just like to say I'm new to this so please point out if I've done anything wrong here as I may take this up in my spare time :) .
	I had this come up when I came here:
	User talk:78.147.150.105
	Jump to: navigation, search
	October 2009
	<Information.png> Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to the page Sole proprietorship has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jusdafax 20:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
	Is this down to me randomly having the same IP or something else, as I can't think of any reason for it...
	Any insight much appreciated!
	Kind regards
	"justpassingtime"
	] (]) 15:31, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
	*You mean , a very mild case of vandalism from over four years ago by an IP who never edited otherwise. If that IP number has has been assigned to you I wouldn't worry about it, especially as you have registered an account name and are editing under it. If it troubles you I can either delete my message or add a note stating that the warning is moot under the circumstances, but I consider it extremely unlikely that it will ever impact you either way. Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and I hope, as the saying here goes, that you like the place and decide to stay! And please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions or concerns. ]]] 22:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
	== Well said ==
	— ] (]) 21:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
	*Thanks, I appreciate it. I hope other editors feel the same way, but as I say, I think this issue needs to be dealt with by the highest levels of the WMF. ]]] 21:40, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
	== RfC to consider ==
	Might you consider offering an opinion on a content dispute between two editors involving the removal of parts of an article on a group of characters in a fictional novel? The discussion is here: ]. Thanks for considering. ] (]) 02:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
	:{{done}} - ]]] 08:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
	== November 2013 GA Thanks ==
	{{User good articles|Paul Butterfield}} On behalf of ], I thank you for your editorial contributions to ], which recently was promoted to ].--] <small>(] / ] / ] / ] / ])</small> 19:04, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
	*Wow, my first... many thanks! ]]] 23:59, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
	== Snowden ==
	Hey, sorry for the "Fundraising section" discussion getting a little heated. I understand you technically didn't say you believe I have a hostile POV, but in my mind it doesn't make much of a difference. You to "the perception that some may have, rightly or wrongly, that you have a hostile POV to Snowden" which strikes me as somewhat validating that perception, as well as being quite similar to, "Whatever you do don't think about a pink elephant!" I felt the need to counter that on the talk page. As for me being appearing to be "spoiling for a fight," I suppose it does appear that way, but it's a natural and appropriate response to being repeatedly and quite rudely (in my view) accused by multiple editors of acting in bad faith. I value civil debate and I hope more you're not the only editor who will engage in it. I, personally, am trying my hardest despite the baiting by some. --] (]) 21:50, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
	:Fair enough. I appreciate your comments, and I thank you for coming here to clarify. My apologies if my manner appears uncivil, even in a backhanded fashion. I do feel that you could be discussed with in a calmer way by others on the talk page. Let's take a deep breath and move on. As it is two areas you have pointed to have been deleted, one by each of us, and this improves the article. There are additions that need to be made as well. I am serious about getting this article to GA status. See you on the talk page. Onward, and thanks again. ]]] 22:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
	== So... ==
	...you endorse ''posing'', do you? Lol. ] (]) 03:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
	*Man, I had that typo fixed within two minutes... but not much gets past you, I see! ]]] 04:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
	::Only because you fixed my typo, which I thought was cute (and nice) of you. ] (]) 04:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
	:::Ah! Happy to help, and happy to see a good consensus on that blurb. ]]] 04:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
	== ANI close ==
	I hate seeing an edit summary --and it was perfectly correct of course. It's really a shame that an indef block is frequently the best we can do. Thanks, ] (]) 18:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
	:Not being an admin, I have never actually blocked anyone. A large moral responsibility to get it right! But I felt, as I noted in my comment, that the only alternative was to avoid pushing the problem to the next group of concerned Wikipedians, and I thank you for making the final call. I looked seriously at the possibility of a topic ban, but the more I studied the edit history, the more I saw an intractable editor running amok. We will never know how many future editor hours you spared with your block, and it is an honor working with you! ]]] 21:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
	== Cold? ==
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Best wishes'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | for the holidays and 2014 from a warmer place than where you probably are ;) ] (]) 12:12, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
	|}
	== A personalized New Year greeting ==
	] 13:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)]] Hi Jusdafax, Happy New Year! I hope that everything with you is well! :) Best. ] 13:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
	{{-}}
	== A Tesla Roadster for you! ==
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"		{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]		|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
			|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> has given you a ] to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''A Tesla Roadster for you!'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for editing Misplaced Pages! ] (]) 01:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
	|}
	== A Tesla Roadster for you! ==
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''A Tesla Roadster for you!'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for editing Misplaced Pages! ] (]) 01:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
	|}
			To give a Dobos torte and spread the ], just place {{tls|Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
	== Please comment on ] ==
			|} <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 11:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
			== Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment ==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 4546 --> ] (]) 00:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 19:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
	== Day We Fight Back RfC - Feedback? ==
			== Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment ==
	Hi JustDaFax ~ always love having a reason to drop by. Wondering if you'd be up for some quick feedback given your support for some sort of nod to The Day We Fight Back. We've just submitted an RfC for a centralized discussion, and I was thinking to get a second opinion on the wording, which is ]. I don't know how late in the game RfC submissions can be amended. It does seem a bit urgent though. We'd love your input, thanks ~ '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 10:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
	*Still somewhat urgent, but we've withdrawn the submission until we get the wording right. It would be smart to submit it soon though, like this weekend. Thanks for your time, '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 11:21, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
	False alarm, JusDaFax, sorry to bother you. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 10:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 20:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
	== Hendrix ==
			== Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment ==
	Now you're Wikibuddies are pushing a drug POV at ] in an effort to justify the mugshot that displays "a clam dignity". They want to that so that the mugshot has contextual significance. Are you on board with this? ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 17:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
	*Gabe, I give you a lot of credit for working as hard on the article as you have, and I know this is important to you. I saw Hendrix twice as a kid, and I have yet to see a more impressive music performance, so the article is a concern to me as well. There will always be controversy around him and how he is portrayed. All that said, we disagree on the mugshots being important to the article. The "Wikibuddies" you refer to are not editors I know or have edited much with, and they may well have different motivations than mine for inclusion. Bottom line is for me that we should let this go now and move on. I might be wrong but I don't see the numbers of editors you need to remove the mugshots. It's a timesink and the topic has reached the point of exhaustion. However, I'll take a look into the article soon and see for myself. My best wishes, and as always I admire your passion. Blessings! ]]] 05:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
	** FWIW, Cullen and they for misleading people. You say we don't have the !votes, but if just two people !voted the other way it would be 14–7, which is certainly enough. ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 17:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 04:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
			== Ref formatting walkthrough ==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 5769 --> ] (]) 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
	:Looks like they won't leave you alone on this one, Jusdafax! {{(:}} --] (]) 23:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
	:: ]? ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 00:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
	:::Yeah that's pretty uncanny, Trypto. Gabe as you know by now I think you have found a reasonable solution, and it looks like you have consensus to keep. It wont make everyone happy, but as I say it clearly improves the encyclopedia. Thanks for your hard work. ]]] 00:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
	:::: Thanks for your support, Jusdafax. ] <sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 00:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
			Hi,
	== Notice ==
			I wanted to give you a quick rundown on the ref formatting process.
	There is an AfD discussion that may interest you over at ]. Thanks. ] (]) 05:46, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
			Taking the ref you added most recently to the ] as an example, it's a good start.
	== Your input is requested for consensus ==
			https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Calls_for_Joe_Biden_to_suspend_his_2024_United_States_presidential_campaign&diff=1234137653&oldid=1234135759
	Please comment over at ]. Thanks. ] (]) 20:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
			You just need to add the opening and closing brackets before and after the ref tags. Then add a few key ref parameters, like "|title=", "|url=", "date=", "|work=" and "|last1=|first1=", too (this one can change depending on the article; it's sometimes "|author=").
	== Please comment on ] ==
			That's pretty much it. Let me know if you have any questions.
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 6721 --> ] (]) 00:07, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
			Hope this is helpful.
	==Belated thanks==
	]
	I know this is terribly late but I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your participation at my RfA. While you did not support my nomination, I still appreciated your participation in the process. I look forward to the opportunity to work together in the days to come. Best wishes, --<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 19:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
			] (]) 20:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
			== Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment ==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 8808 --> ] (]) 00:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 12:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
	== ''American politics'' arbitration evidence ==
			== Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment ==
	Hi. You contributed to a recent RFC about this topic area. This message is to notify you that the arbitration proceedings at ] are underway, and evidence about '''all disruptive edits to articles within this topic''' is being accepted at ]. If you wish to submit evidence for the committee to consider in reaching its decision, please do so now. The evidence phase of the case ends soon, and evidence submitted after the deadline may not be considered. Further advice on submitting evidence, and what evidence the committee will accept, is linked at the top of the evidence page. Please contact me or the other drafting arbitrator if you require more time to submit evidence. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee, ] ]] 14:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 22:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			{{ombox
			| name = First Edit Day
			| image = ]
			| imageright = ]
			| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
			| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			| plainlinks = yes
			| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Jusdafax! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 07:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
			}}
			*Thank you. I have commented in the past on receiving this notice to the effect that that day in 2007 seems long ago to me, and at this moment I am again struck by the truth of that sentiment. ] (]) 10:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
			== Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment ==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 10609 --> ] (]) 00:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 01:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
	== Banter at AN/I ==
			== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
	A statement as without any evidence (and even then it's up to interpretation) may just as well never have been put forth. I think you know this better than I do. All of my posts at AN/I within the past 24 hours either reek of "provide diffs", "let's move on" (in fact a conciliatory gesture), or are otherwise to the OP. Please reconsider. "<span style="font-family:Buxton Sketch; color:FireBrick">My master, ], bids thee <sup>]</sup></span>" 08:10, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
	*I want you to permanently stay off my talk page, thanks. ]]] 08:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
	:*I'll honour that, but that was not polite in the slightest. "<span style="font-family:Buxton Sketch; color:FireBrick">My master, ], bids thee <sup>]</sup></span>" 08:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	== Feedback request ==
			<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
	I am inviting you to ], 18 months after you opposed my RfA. Do you still believe I am not fit to be an admin? Do you believe I have been able to improve past the concerns you have brought up? Do not be afraid of being too harsh, I am specifically welcoming criticism as I believe it is the best way to improve and I am always looking to learn from my mistakes. I am particularly looking for feedback as to whether you have objections to myself lifting the self-imposed 1RR restriction I had agreed to towards the end of my RfA. If you don't have time to comment, don't fret it either, this is nothing I'll lose sleep over. :) <span style="font-family:Sylfaen;color:white;background:black;padding:0 3px;">☺&nbsp;·&nbsp;]&nbsp;·&nbsp;]</span> 19:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	==Your signature==
	How do you make your signature look the way it does? ] (]) 12:17, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
	*I cheerfully admit I stole the coding from someone, but I no longer remember whom. If you like it you are free to do likewise, of course. Best to you, ]]] 10:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC))
			If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
	== JSTOR - Action required ==
	We need your email address in order to give/renew your JSTOR access. Please email Library Coordinator Ocaasi at jorlowitz{{@}}gmail.com so we can get you your account as soon as possible. Thanks, <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">] ]</span> 17:50, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
	== Arrogant and abusive ==
	Dear Jusdafax, in a discussion on civility it is counterproductive to refer to editors as "arrogant and abusive". It wouldn't really change much if you shifted the language to refer to an editor's comments rather than the editors, since I don't think that a comment can really be abusive. If you believe that (in this case) Eric is an arrogant and abusive editor and that his incivility drives off editors (there is no proof for that), and you state that here, you are yourself committing a personal attack that may drive editors away. (Maybe not Eric, but anyone who finds your comments offensive.) I would never block for a comment like that, though I think it ''is'' a personal attack, and it flies in the face of AGF, but really, do you think that such commentary is productive? I found BrownHairedGirl's block to be very incorrect, but I'll stop short of saying that it was "an arrogant and abusive block meant to drive an editor away"--if only because I don't believe it's true. I'll assume good faith, even if I couldn't disagree more. If you really believe Eric (or anyone else) is ''that'' uncivil (and clearly this is a matter of interpretation: you can't just dismiss your opponents as fools), why would you respond with more incivility? on a board as public as Jimbo's talk page? Sorry, but I think that's doing nothing to solve whatever problem we may have. Thank you, ] (]) 15:32, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
	*I call 'em like I see 'em. Note the links below my comment that point to the resignation of Khazar2. He specifically states he was driven away by Eric Corbett. Now, what do you call a person like Eric Corbett? Kindly and compassionate? His block was richly deserved, was hardly his first, and in my view he needs to be shown the door with corrective action. Sorry we disagree so strongly, as I often agree with you on policy matters. ]]] 16:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
	:*Do you see the irony? "I call 'em like I see 'em"--I'm sure Eric could say that too... Sorry, but I'm not feeling you. ] (]) 16:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
	:*It just occurred to me: the essence of civility is probably that you can't call 'em like you see 'em. It's filtering. ] (]) 16:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
	== Hey ==
	Hi, JDF. Just wanted to drop by your page and let you know that I'm around again. I enjoyed our productive interaction at VA/E, but I was also hitting the wiki-wall at the time and needed some quiet time away from the 'pedia. Let me know if I can of service in any of your present endeavors. ] (]) 20:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
	*Likewise, thanks. If you choose to run for admin again you have my support, though I have advocated disbanding the admin corps in favor of selected volunteers with term limits, and WMF paid admins. By the way I have largely withdrawn from the vital articles project. Best wishes! ]]] 22:24, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
	:*A bit of the anarchist, you are, JDF. PBP stopped by my talk page the other day to ask if I were going to get involved in VA/E again. I told him that things seem to have settled down there, and muddling along just fine without me. I see myself as primarily a content creator, and I like to channel my non-editing WP efforts to either helping others create good content, defend good content, or maintain standards for good content. Process and organization have their place, of course, but I get plenty of that in the RW. Stuff like ANI, etc., will never be a focus for me because I see it as a distraction from content creation, and a demoralizing one at that. I felt like I was on arbitrator/mediator duty at VA/E, and that can suck the life and enthusiasm out of you pretty quickly. Most of us don't need a second job. Cheers. ] (]) 23:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
	Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 12469 --> ] (]) 00:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
	==] access==
	Hello, ] has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at ] . You should have recieved a Misplaced Pages email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at ]. Thanks much, ] (]) 21:16, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
	<small>Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at ].</small>
	==Disambiguation link notification for August 11==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
	== Reply to a reverted and blocked sock ==
	*Nah. I'm a very part time editor these days, and I'll leave the enforcement to the enforcers. I do feel I have earned the right to contribute my opinion on policy matters. It's really too bad that you have to be so abrasive and in-your-face about editing. I believe I have indicated in the past that I often agree with you on some policy and I admire your hard work as an editor. But the bottom line is that we either have to lose our civility, blocking and socking rules and permit you and others of your ilk to run wild, or we have to take harsh measures. I advise the latter. For what it is worth, I wish you good fortunes. I think you could be very great in some field other than this one. I ask you to do the decent thing, and move on. ]]] 10:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
	== ANI ==
	I think we might be talking at cross-purposes at ANI. I'm not really interested in specific cases, and obviously, if you are being harassed by a troll, that's not something I support. It's the wider question that intrigues me. Thanks. --] (]) 22:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
	== Your NAC close at ANI ==
	Re: your close with the edit summary "ArbCom case makes this moot". I am unaware of any case that Arbcom has accepted concerning a topic ban between these individuals. In fact, Arbcom usually requires that other avenues of resolution be exhausted before they will accept a case. —] (]) 21:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
	:Objections noted. If you scroll up, you will notice I did not close the proposed topic ban discussion sections. Discussion in the three sections I closed was waning, and appeared to be shedding more heat than light. In any case, in my view, a topic ban may or may not come into play as a remedy at ArbCom. Additionally, , further mooting the entire issue, as I see it. ]]] 21:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
	::Okay, I see now what you did. You are entirely correct. The only real option still in play is the mutual interaction ban, but the voting is so confused that whoever closes it will need both threads to figure out who voted for what. That is, if anyone gets around to closing it before it archives. —] (]) 06:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC))
	== Halloween cheer! ==
	<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000; background-color:#FFB924; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]]
	{{Center|'''''{{resize|187%|Happy ]!}}'''''}}
	----
	'''Hello Jusdafax:<br>Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable ]!'''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;{{spaced ndash}} ] (]) 20:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
	<br><br>{{Center|<small>Send Halloween cheer by adding {{tls|Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.</small>}}
	</div>		</div>
			</div>
	==Disambiguation link notification for November 2==
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 13:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
	== November 2014 ==
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span>
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	*<nowiki>* 4x ] </nowiki>{{red|'''&#40;'''}}<nowiki>], ], ], [</nowiki>
	*<nowiki>* ] </nowiki>{{red|'''&#40;'''}}<nowiki>{{mlby|1996}}</nowiki>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (2, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 23:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC))
	== DangerousPanda arbitation request opened ==
	You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration and have not been listed as a party. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at ]. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at ]. '''Please add your evidence by 3 December 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, ]. For a guide to the arbitration process, see ]. For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 12:36, 19 November 2014 (UTC). <small>Message delivered by ]</small>
	<!-- Message sent by User:Callanecc@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Callanecc/arbcom&oldid=634527090 -->
	== A barnstar for you! ==
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Civility Barnstar'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For understanding that you can disagree with someone without disrespecting someone.
	As far as I am concerned people can disagree with me all day if they are respectful like you. Keep up giving debate a good name. ] 04:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
	|}
	*I thank you. In fact I have noticed that since about 2009 I have agreed with you much more often than not. As for the substance of the issue, I remain quite discouraged. I will spare you my further observations, and wish you robust health and good fortunes! ]]] 05:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
	== A kitten for you! ==
	]
	Cause I've seen you be quite sensible more than once! Yay!
	<small>'''] (])'''</small> 15:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
	<br style="clear: both;"/>)
	== Best wishes for a happy holiday season ==
	<center>
	{| style="border:1px solid 3px; background-color: purple;<!--#FF0000;--> width: 755px;"
	|rowspan="2" valign="center" | <!--]-->]
	|rowspan="2" |
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |<font color="gold"><span style{{=}}"font-family:Segoe Script">'''Happy Holiday Cheer'''</span>
	|-
	|style="vertical-align:top; border-top:1px solid gray; color:#FFA060" | <font color="white">'''Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes ], and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an ] and a ], whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! ''Joys!'''''] (]) 02:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
	|}</center>
	== WP:IDHT ==
	What part do you think I did not hear yet?
	Why do you think I should be blocked? In what way will it help Misplaced Pages? ] (]) 08:37, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
	*Please stay off my talk page, thank you. ]]] 08:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
	You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to ] on '''Talk:Jimi Hendrix'''. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see {{section link|Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment|Suggestions for responding}}. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 19442 --> ] (]) 00:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
	*Again? ]]] 02:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
	Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in ]. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
	For tips, please see {{section link|Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment|Suggestions for responding}}. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 19829 --> ] (]) 00:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
	Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in ]. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
	For tips, please see {{section link|Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment|Suggestions for responding}}. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 20192 --> ] (]) 00:02, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
	== Woodstock ==
	Since you !voted in a similar discussion that recently closed, I thought you should be made aware that a similar move proposal is occurring at ], in case you want to weigh in.--] ] 17:06, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
	*It appears I already have, thanks. ]]] 18:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
	:*Whoops. It looks like in the first discussion your signature had a space in it (Jus dafax), while the second didn't, which is probably why I mixed it up. My bad, sorry.--] ] 00:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
	::*All good, thanks for the heads up. ]]] 01:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
	== Move review ==
	There is currently a discussion at ] to which you may be associated with. The thread can be found ]. Thanks. ] (]) 22:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC))
	== Please comment on ] ==
	Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in ]. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
	For tips, please see {{section link|Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment|Suggestions for responding}}. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 21464 --> ] (]) 00:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
	The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 22753 --> ] (]) 00:04, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
	The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 23204 --> ] (]) 00:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
	The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 23638 --> ] (]) 00:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
	== Please comment on ] ==
	The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 24071 --> ] (]) 00:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
	===Personal remarks===
	<strike>] Please do not ] other editors. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --></strike>
	] <sup>]|]|]</sup> 16:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
	*I hereby ask you to stay off my talk page permanently. Thank you. ]]] 17:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
	I apologize for over reacting and will abide by your request. ] <sup>]|]|]</sup> 00:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
			== Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment ==
	== MfD ==
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 11:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
	I think you may have accidentally linked the wrong user as the one who templated you following comments on MfD. I have not seen IP98 participate in that MfD. Did you mean to link Formerly 98? --] (]) 22:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
	== proposed iban, please comment ==		== Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment ==
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 02:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
	given your involvement, please see . Thanks. ] (]) 22:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
			== Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment ==
	== Please comment on ] ==
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 22:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
	The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 24879 --> ] (]) 00:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
			== Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment ==
	== Please comment on ] ==
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 17:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
	The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 25339 --> ] (]) 00:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
			== Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment ==
	== Bare URLs?!? ==
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 19:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
	Fix that! <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333" size="2">]</font></b><font color="#444" size="2">]</font></span> 12:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
	*Am hamstrung for time of late, and reason that a bare ref is better than none. ]]] 03:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
	::Well, fix it. This is what FA decay looks like. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333" size="2">]</font></b><font color="#444" size="2">]</font></span> 20:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
	*Let's get a few things straight, my lad. I professionally covered Kilauea Volcano ''nationwide'' when you were shitting your diapers. Clearly those parents of yours failed utterly to teach decent manners. The article is in flux, and you don't own it, nor are you entitled to give me orders. I will edit as possible, and how I see fit. This is my talk page and I now ask you to stay off it, permanently. ]]] 21:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
			== Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment ==
	== Regarding ==
			]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 11:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
	This section is for those, if any, who wish to comment. As the section just above shows, as I age I am increasingly impatient with what I perceive as rudeness on my talk page, and have banned people for such. However, I am aware I have previously asked parties involved in said ANI report to stay off this page, so in fairness, if you wish to comment directly here, you may do so, but I request that scrupulous civility and respect towards me be maintained. Thank you. ]]] 22:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
	:Hi Jusdafax. While I appreciate you taking the time to close, I ask you to reconsider. You have expressed strong interest in COI issues in Misplaced Pages. I call your attention to the Wifione case at Arbom, which was actually conducted as a long-term POV pushing case. I also point you to the TimidGuy Ban appeal, where an editor went full force after an another editor for paid editing, and was himself banned. To take care of long-term paid editors, is ''the same path'' as taking care of long-term POV pushers. The case I presented was a slam dunk for long-term POV pushing (a mission statement of single-issue advocacy and a record of having done nothing but that) and - while I very much wanted to take care of issues with Doors specifically, the larger issues were very much at play here. We need to establish a path - we need to encourage editors to bring cases just like this one, instead of flailing around like the community did with Wifione. (all the evidence presented there was 2013 and before - the NPOV case could have been brought ''two years ago'' but the path was not clear). I recognize that I am controversial, and that distracted from the the case of Doors. If you cannot see the very clear evidence and the consensus for the topic ban, I ask you to simply self-revert your close. I am OK with waiting for a close that considers the evidence that was brought. Thank you ] (]) 00:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

---

Latest revision as of 11:30, 17 January 2025

Welcome to my talk page. Please add new messages to the BOTTOM of the page by starting a new section heading - just use the 'New section' tab above. I will respond to new messages here, so please watchlist my page. If I leave YOU a message, I'll watchlist your page and look for a reply there. NOTE: Though active in anti-vandalism here, I am not a Misplaced Pages administrator.

Archives

Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 4. Archive 5. Archive 6. Archive 7. Archive 8. Archive 9. Archive 10. Archive 11. Archive 12. Archive 13. Archive 14. Archive 15.

"Corrections on Ijdeebrin"

Hello,

In my attempt to add some information to the article "Ijdeebrine", you reverted my changes claiming that my citations weren't valid or not enough. I would just like to say that my changes, those which you reverted, I wasn't done with them and these are very well known facts.

The family that I speak of has many houses across the village considering this a very large family. This family is split after a long process concering ancestry, but the family was reconnected by marriage occuring between 1940 and 1950, that marriage resulting in almost 30-40 new additions to the family by birth and marriage. This family keeps expanding itself across this community making an effort to withstand it.

Please tell me what I should do so that I can add some of the family's contributions and importance in the village.

        -  I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ijdeebrine, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so!

Dominantxx (talk) 23:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Your statement that I am "claiming" your sources are inadequate is not correct. I am stating a fact based on established Misplaced Pages policy. As I said in my edit summary, please read and understand WP:RS (reliable sources) and WP:OR (original research) which details sourcing requirements for Misplaced Pages. Also important is WP:Citing sources and WP:N (notability), of particular importance in building an encyclopedia based on verifiability, covered under WP:V. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

The Red Room

Thanks for fixing The Red Room. I didn't notice that the vandalism went back more than one edit! Leschnei (talk) 00:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

• It happens to me too. Thanks for your note. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 00:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

please explain

!!! I am not a vandal. MOST of what is on the page I have no issue with BUT a government agency CREATED in 1958 did not certify something in 1928!!! (Heath Parasol)

I'D LIKE TO CREDIT AN INNOVATOR... Mr Heath published at least three different versions of his plans in the 1920s, then he later sold kits of one of those plans but to my mind any "flying thing" built to any of those plans is a Heath. Others, notably Mann, credit Heath in the derivative plans they created.

Further NOTHING was certified in the US prior to 1928, only "aircraft" were certified by the CAB 1928-1958 (YOU CAN GOOGLE YOURSELF HERE) and the FAA 1958- (AGAIN GOOGLE "WIKIPEDIA") by legal (FAR 103 -- Guess what! YOU CAN GOOGLE YOU AGAIN!) definition a thing that flies BUT is 254 pounds or less in empty weight is not legally an aircraft.

YOUR ENTRY LISTS THE PARASOL AT 280 pounds with a 105 pound engine, but some INCLUDING MINE were built with 45 pound engines, that brings them under the 254 pound FAR 103 limit. THAT IS ALL THAT I AM TRYING TO SAY. I love the Parasol, I own one, I'd be happy to share and make the entry on the Parasol better -- I AM NOT A VANDAL but the original author has only told part of the story.

Feel free to email me at pa25235c@gmail.com

PS your pages are not easy to navigate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piper PA25235C (talk • contribs) 21:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

How can you delete what I am writing when you don't even know the subject. Why can't I write a biography where you don't know the person. Is there a specific rule? I understand me getting the information on has been a bit messy and probably not the right way but nothing had been published yet and all the information is 100% accurate. Some people need o learn, we don't all do this for a living. please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floridians (talk • contribs) 04:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

• First off, please understand I am strictly a volunteer, and have never taken money for my work here, much less doing "this for a living." Nor am I an administrator here. I nominated your published UserPage for deletion because it was being used not for your purposes as a Misplaced Pages editor, but for promotion. Please note that the administrator who reviewed my nomination agreed, and carried out the deletion. I suggest that you use a Draft page in the future, which clearly distinguishes your material to editors and readers as being an article-in-progress. The learning curve here is a bit steep, but with patience, and study of how other editors write new articles, your sourced content will be accepted. Take your time, and you will understand the various requirements that go with creating content. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 04:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:--MULLIGANACEOUS--

Hello Jusdafax. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:--MULLIGANACEOUS--, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a blatant misuse of Misplaced Pages as a webhost. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 08:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

• This is my personal page, and I am not intending to put anything remotely controversial or unsuitable for this site. Kinda strange that my user page was mistaken as for an actual Misplaced Pages page. The info posted here comes directly from Candy Crush Saga wiki, which I am an administrator here. Right now, I only occasionally contribute on Misplaced Pages, mostly correcting vandalism. --MULLIGANACEOUS-- (talk) 02:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Greetings to you both. I nominated this User page for speedy deletion because I consider it to be, per under WP:U5 of WP:Speedy, a "Blatant misuse of Misplaced Pages as a web host" in my view, as the criteria in question describes "Pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Misplaced Pages's goals, where the owner has made few or no edits outside of user pages." The wording on U5 policy is quite direct. Since the User page indeed has very little to do with Misplaced Pages and describes in substantial detail the user's video gaming activities, complete with tables and including a contact email, it seemed worthy of my nomination. My nomination was declined. Obviously I disagree with that call, and will take the decision under advisement. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 21:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

shilmani

i was just testing the shilmani page. moreover it was initial writing. i want to create a page for Rahat Khan Shalmani who was a prominent figure in our district. can you help me please how to create that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirzaman69 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

• Hello. I reverted your edit to the Shilmani article that stated "Naek Amal Khan was elected as a member of provincial assembly in 1990 and 1997 from ANP. he was very noble person" which has several problems. Saying someone is "very noble" is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy per Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view. Not including a reference or source to confirm your edit is also a violation of WP:Verifiability and Misplaced Pages:No original research. To understand the referencing requirements at Misplaced Pages, I suggest you start at Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources. A Google search of Rahat Khan Shalmani doesn't give any useable references that I can find in English, but you may find some in other languages. I hope this helps you understand my revert. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 21:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Misplaced Pages:Rohan Anil Patole

Hello Jusdafax. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Misplaced Pages:Rohan Anil Patole, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's not in userspace. Should be in mainspace, I'll move it, then tag it for A7. Sorry to be anal about the criteria. Thank you. GedUK  10:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

The mainspace article has been speedily deleted by another admin now. Thanks. GedUK  11:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

• All good, dont recall seeing a case like this before. Thanks for the note. Jusdafax (talk) 13:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Nick Cody 66

I am not engaging in sockpuppetry. Mooving Media was shut down by admin because my ID looked corporate. I am just an individual, so i registered under my own name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Cody 66 (talk • contribs) 09:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I just read the report and understand my error. Jusdafax (talk) 09:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppety

Seems your attack on me for adding factual, balanced, impartial information to the article 'Magnus Walker' has fallen on deaf ears. Too bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Cody 66 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

I'd disagree with your assessment, given the fact that several other editors felt as I did about your edits and reverted them also, and you are now banned from editing the article. I goofed, true. Suggest we call it even and move on. Jusdafax (talk) 10:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Naomismallsduhh

Hello Jusdafax. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Naomismallsduhh, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Should probably be on a subpage, but it's pretty clearly encylopedic. Thank you. GedUK  13:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

I'd agree about the subpage. It's not a proper User page at all. Jusdafax (talk) 04:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

update on the item "ceva logistics"

Dear Sir/Madame,

I updated the source link in the text/dialogue message. Also i attached hereto. www.cevalogistics.com/about-us/our-history

Would you please have a review?

Thanks Luthyd

P.S. My ID is "Luthyd" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luthyd (talk • contribs) 09:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#JzG and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,

• Noted, thanks. I will consider this, and may or may not participate. Jusdafax (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

JzG case request declined

The case request "JzG" that you are a party to has been declined by the committee after a absolute majority of arbitrators voted to decline the case request. The case request has been removed from Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case. A permanent link to the declined case can be accessed through this wikilink.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 15:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Reverted my edits on Misplaced Pages page Vic Gilliam

Hello,

I had made edits to the Misplaced Pages page Vic Gilliam regarding the recent death hoax confirmed by Domo (read more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Domo_(NHK))

So why was my edit reverted, I gave you the link, I hope this can be helpful.

• User blocked. Mr. Gilliam's death is not disputed anywhere I can find. Jusdafax (talk) 04:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

request for restoring of the page

Hi Jusdafax,, I sincerely seek your help regarding this matter. I was trying to prepare a page for this 75+ year old gentleman P V Raghunathan who I feel merits inclusion on the wiki pages. It is not for publicity or for any other commercial reasons. In fact, he does not crave for any limelight. He has recently written his Autobiographical book 'My Many Trysts with God' which has been published by a well-known publisher of Chennai of Tamil Nadu State of India and has garnered excellent reviews on Amazon Indian site as well as global site. It is his maiden published work yet if you see the quality of his work I am sure you will be convinced that it is no less than any autobiography (both in contents as well as expression) written by anyone and published so far.

He is in the process of giving final shape to 2 more projects- one is a book on scientific spiritualism and another is the compilation of his travelogues of the journeys he has undertaken. Both of them are also of excellent quality.

As I am absolutely new to this technology of designing a page on wikipedia, I was making many trials and experiments which forced me view how the page was looking like several times.

I would highly appreciate if you please restore the contents of the page on the namespace of this user. Thanking you, sincerely yours, Abha Mittal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhragh2009 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

• Sorry, but I'm unable to restore the page. As your topic header notes, I was the editor who nominated the page, but it was actually deleted by an administrator. Your Misplaced Pages User page is meant to be for your goals as a Wikipedian, not for article drafts. I suggest you review Misplaced Pages:Drafts, which will give you more information on how to create a proper draft and prepare it for article space. Also worthy of your time are WP:N, WP:V and additional pages like Misplaced Pages:Citing sources to help you correctly format your draft. Creating a new article on Misplaced Pages is not easy if you have no previous experience, so you may want to start smaller, with a few edits to articles, to learn the ways of this place. Best wishes! Jusdafax (talk) 04:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you so much Jusdafax for giving me your valuable guidance. I'll seek the help of the administrator in getting the page restored. Sincerely yours, Abhragh2009 (talk) 11:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Abha Mittal

Request for Biography page

Hi jusdafax, I got your message; can you please help me in publishing my contribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammylrza (talk • contribs) 06:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

• To be brief, I can't help because you have used your User page for a draft of an article you wrote about yourself, which is frowned on here per WP:AUTOBIO. It's also an issue per WP:COI. Again, my suggestion is to put the page in Draft space or a Sandbox, and get further advice from someone other than me, probably an administrator. I also suggest you do some editing of different articles, because as of this posting you also appear to be a WP:SPA, here not to build an encyclopedia only to promote yourself. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Domo

How dare you block me! Domo confirmed the death hoax and I provided you with a proper link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Praisethelord03 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

• User indeffed by an admin. Jusdafax (talk) 22:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

PBBs vs. kepone

How come that you judge polybrominated biphenyls to have a mid importance, while you assign high to kepone (chlordecone)? IMHO PCBs clearly PBBs have a higher importance from an environmental (and public health) perspective. --Leyo 08:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

• Happy to review the importance rating, and in fact I agree. If you'd care to do the honors, that's great, otherwise I'll switch them tomorrow. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 08:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Done On further thought and study, both articles are high importance, so I have upgraded the PBB article to high. PBB's of course are related to PCB's, though not actually the same thing. Kepone is a banned substance as well. If you want to downgrade it, I won't dispute it, but I think it's a good case for high importance. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 22:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

That's fine, thanks. --Leyo 22:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Julie Passas

I have raised an WP:ANI regarding her edits, here Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#disruptive_editing_from_Single_Purpose_Editor:_Julie_Passas. LibStar (talk) 01:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

• As I say at ANI, I've filed at AIV, so we can probably close this quickly. Jusdafax (talk) 01:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your kind words in support of my appeal, which just closed and was successful. --David Tornheim (talk) 00:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

• You are welcome. The process took 100 days or so to complete, which I and others felt was excessive, but now that it is over, my cheerful congratulations! Jusdafax (talk) 23:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

No citation

You stated I did not include a citation in my edit, however I not only posted a parenthetical citation but also added the CNN article to the references section. Please give more information regarding what YOU view as a valid citation if an international news source doesn't cut it. It just seems like you're trying to get a school out of acknowledging their racism.65.79.129.245 (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

• Greetings. I revert vandalism on Misplaced Pages. Please note that you failed to add an edit summary, as the edit screen requested to this edit you made to the infobox. The edit was also malformed, as it did not fit the infobox format. It is indeed true that you added a reference in your previous edit, but that did not show up in the edit you made, again without an edit summary. Since you are a new editor, it's understandable. However, when you accuse me of what you think "seems" to be, you are crossing a line, and creating needless drama. Take your time, learn the formatting rules to edit Misplaced Pages, and cool the veiled accusations, is my advice. Jusdafax (talk) 22:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your Sinclair Edits

Unless you think that Simon Cooke, olympic sailor also wrote for Your Sinclair magazine, you might be confused. Generally, links to other wikipedia pages don't require citations. I'm not sure what kind of proof you'd expect as a citation, other than links to the actual magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.209.4 (talk) 04:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

• Hello. I see the article the Misplaced Pages link leads to is an article that was deleted, but is under review. I also see you have reverted my edit, but I won't revert further pending the outcome. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 04:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
• * Thank you. Yeah, there were some recent changes that led to another biography page ended up linked to this one; hopefully this will all get resolved soon so that the link stays correct (or goes away). 24.16.209.4 (talk) 05:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of my Account

Hello! I see you nominated for the speedy deletion of my account. Honestly, I don't blame you. I am new to Misplaced Pages and may not have grasped the essentials of adding and editing articles here. Perhaps, I was hoping you could be of help in giving me some advice... Regards! Persont118 (talk) 06:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

• Hi there. Yes, learning effective editing technique, and understanding the many policies and editor culture here, is the big challenge on this website. I suggest reading Help: Misplaced Pages: The Missing Manual for starters. As for the User Page that was deleted (not your account, or user identity) it's generally about one's interests and goals on Misplaced Pages, not a personal biography.

You can start a new User Page with that in mind ; Misplaced Pages:User pages is a place to start (you will see a reccomendation of "limited" personal details) and WP:Notability, WP:COI and WP:Verifiability are important for editing articles in mainspace. English Misplaced Pages is a big confusing place that takes study at the start. I learned a lot by looking at the coding in edit screens, and copying coding methods. I hope this helps. Jusdafax (talk) 07:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Translations

Hi, I received your message about you reverting my change in Asta Hampe's page. Your reason for reverting the change is that she is a living person, and in fact, she passed away in 2003. Furthermore, part of the change was merely adding automatic age calculation on the right with the information that is already available in the main article, the change of which I felt should not be reverted. The other change is regarding adding a partner Andy Röper, which is actually directly translated from German Misplaced Pages article (since she was a German person, often, there are more information about the people in their native language) and because that article did not cite a source there, I presume that particular article might also not be valid.

Plan ADOP reverts

Hey Jusdafax, I think we should take a better look at the changes made to the Plan ADOP article. IP 90.173.2.245 has made 20+ changes, adding lots of information. It's with a learning curve (uncited first, etc), but I think we can assume good faith. After your last revert, the user added some text. Can you think of any reason why this text should be reverted? Cheers, Pyrite Pro (talk) 08:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

• Hello, and thanks for your note. At first glance, what with previous repeated warnings, no edit summaries, and an IP who is a WP:SPA, this looked like an easy call. A further look shows some references were added, so I'll stand down. If you want me to pull my Talk page warning, I will. Jusdafax (talk) 08:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Condon Committee, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Misplaced Pages's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. There is no evidence that UFOs are taken seriously today. Your edit implied that this may be the case. jps (talk) 19:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

• 'Do We Believe in U.F.O.s? That’s the Wrong Question' New York Times, July 28, 2020
• ‘Unidentified Aerial Phenomena,’ Better Known as UFOs, Deserve Scientific Investigation' Scientific American, July 27, 2020

Jusdafax (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

• I see you have not responded to my links, which contradict your assertion in italics. Jusdafax (talk) 22:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard M. Dolan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard M. Dolan is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Richard M. Dolan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 19:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Perchlorate Page Update

Hello - I saw you made the most recent edits on the perchlorate. I wanted to inform you that the U.S. EPA has recently made a final determination on perchlorate and this information could be added to the section on "Regulation in the US - drinking Water. A link to the notice in the Federal Register is here: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/07/21/2020-13462/drinking-water-final-action-on-perchlorate

I would be grateful if you could update the page. As I am a consultant to companies that use and manufacturer perchlorate it would not be appropriate for me do to so.

Thank you in advance - happy to answer any questions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:C500:13A0:5C28:73DF:241F:AE68 (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

• Hello. Actually, I have never edited the perchlorate article. I did add a template to the article Talk page, but that's quite a different matter. A Google search of the term "perchlorate not regulated" leads me to believe the topic is complex and contentious, and at this time I have other priorities on Misplaced Pages and elsewhere, so I'm going to decline, but thanks for asking. Perhaps one of the other editors on the article can be of assistance. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks. Quite a decade... Jusdafax (talk) 03:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Reverted... Why!? Internet.org

Hi, I have added that site (https://hahahafunnyjokes.blogspot.com) in the "Available websites" section... It was surprising for me that you have removed the site just because you don't like it!? WHY? FreeBasic service allowed this site and it should be in the section of the Available website... what's wrong with it? Please add this site again or give me a logical reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/Internet.org#Available_websites

Are You There...? Could you please respond on it? I am waiting for your answer.

• I am returning from an extended WikiBreak, and see that my edit reverting you was six months prior to your statements here, and that I am not alone in judging your edit to be spam and reverting it. Since a warning was placed on your Talk page, you seem to have cooled down, and the matter appears to be concluded. Jusdafax (talk) 03:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Surreal Barnstar
	thanks for helping me out :) Harry F. Humbert (talk) 14:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks, though I can't recall how I was of assistance. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 03:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, Jusdafax. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Megan☺️ 07:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Thirteen years, eh? Hmmm! Jusdafax (talk) 03:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU 19:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks, I appreciate it. Jusdafax (talk) 03:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Concerns on an editor's recent edits

Hello Jusdafax, I am a casual editor who happened to stumble across your user when investigating possible avenues to report a potential issue. I understand you are not an administrator, but I would appreciate any input on this matter.

I have come across several current (and some reverted) edits by an editor (I found your signature on their talk page) across several articles on Texas municipalities that I believe to be concerning. Edits include stating a city is "known as a redneck enclave" ("redneck" also being present in their other edits), removal of information, swapping out pertinent information with other comments, seemingly a trend to remove references to other municipalities (1, 2, 3, 4), among other changes. I do not believe these edits to be constructive.

I considered reverting many changes, but I am unsure about the actual preferred action to take here (I am not particularly interested in taking a deep dive into Misplaced Pages policies and processes) and I am not all that interested to be the one to directly tackle this issue. I would appreciate input on this matter (thoughts, comments, issuing a warning, etc.), or if you could please direct this concern to the appropriate request board so that these pages may be restored. Thank you.

SystematicAnarchy (talk) 17:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, yes I was concerned about this editor as well some months ago. I see they have been have been blocked earlier today, and if there are further incidents the best thing to do is contact the blocking admin. Cheers, and thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposal to merge Plug-in electric vehicle into Battery electric vehicle

If you are interested please discuss at Talk:Battery_electric_vehicle#Merger_proposal Chidgk1 (talk) 06:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

I did not make any changes

Hi, I did not make any changes to Sarcoidosis.

Cheers, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.64.196.47 (talk) 08:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

I did not make any changes either

Re University of Bradford. You got the wrong geezer.

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

Sorry for that edit

Sorry for the edit that I did. I just think she is beautiful. 65.128.134.15 (talk) 03:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Liswoski

Heard it said numerous times in commentary, and its becoming his moniker in common parlance. Should you all be deciding on Misplaced Pages edits if you don't actually have a working knowledge of what your editing? Just a thought. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.10.191.51 (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

• Welcome to Misplaced Pages. If you want to add a nickname of "The Whipping Boy" to a WP:BLP you will have to add a reliable source per WP:RS. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 23:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

care to explain?

my addition to the article of elizaveta tuktamysheva was immediately taken down by you for not having a source. this would be fair if several pieces of information, including the one DIRECTLY ABOVE IT, also didn't have a source. is this really about the lack of a source or the fact that you think you're special? pick one. good day. Juicygorls (talk) 03:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

• Per your statement, I have removed the dating information as well, and added a citation needed tag re:the schooling sentence. May I suggest that you review WP:BLP and WP:RS to aquaint yourself with the operative Misplaced Pages sourcing requirements, as well as WP:Five Pillars, in particular the fourth. Jusdafax (talk) 03:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

theres literally no way to source a fan nickname but go off i guess Juicygorls (talk) 04:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Nigerien vs Nigerian

Hi, I think I am correct in my recent edit to the Hitman 2007 movie page. The scene in question takes place in Niger, not Nigeria, meaning the demonym is Nigerien. Here is a youtube video of said scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjIh7FHeH8c — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.52.147.215 (talk) 13:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Nigerien vs Nigerian

Hi, I think I am correct in my recent edit to the Hitman 2007 movie page. The scene in question takes place in Niger, not Nigeria, meaning the demonym is Nigerien. Here is a youtube video of said scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjIh7FHeH8c — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.52.147.215 (talk) 13:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you Gerda. It goes by quick! Jusdafax (talk) 09:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

2021 World Wushu Championships

Hi. I am Yinglong999, the creator of 2021 World Wushu Championships. I support your stance that both navboxes ('World Championships in 2021' and 'World Wushu Championships') should be kept, and it seems that user:91.124.116.230 is acting quite disruptive right now, deleting what you wrote on his talk page and calling it ″nonsense.″ I will be adding the World Wushu Championships navbox back as it is helpful and all other WWC articles have it. Yinglong999 (talk) 17:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

• Hello. My edits have been called much worse than that over the years. I've reverted the article back to my previous revert, and placed a second warning for unexplained content deletion on the IP editor's Talk page. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 21:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

no problem

earning that "Counter-Vandalism Unit" badge my dear jonas.

good man.

it's like "SVU" but for wikipedia. it's cute and charming! 142.179.232.172 (talk) 02:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Untitled re: plane (moved from above)

!!! I am not a vandal. MOST of what is on the page I have no issue with BUT a government agency CREATED in 1958 did not certify something in 1928!!! (Heath Parasol)

I'D LIKE TO CREDIT AN INNOVATOR... Mr Heath published at least three different versions of his plans in the 1920s, then he later sold kits of one of those plans but to my mind any "flying thing" built to any of those plans is a Heath. Others, notably Mann, credit Heath in the derivative plans they created.

Further NOTHING was certified in the US prior to 1928, only "aircraft" were certified by the CAB 1928-1958 (YOU CAN GOOGLE YOURSELF HERE) and the FAA 1958- (AGAIN GOOGLE "WIKIPEDIA") by legal (FAR 103 -- Guess what! YOU CAN GOOGLE YOU AGAIN!) definition a thing that flies BUT is 254 pounds or less in empty weight is not legally an aircraft.

YOUR ENTRY LISTS THE PARASOL AT 280 pounds with a 105 pound engine, but some INCLUDING MINE were built with 45 pound engines, that brings them under the 254 pound FAR 103 limit. THAT IS ALL THAT I AM TRYING TO SAY. I love the Parasol, I own one, I'd be happy to share and make the entry on the Parasol better -- I AM NOT A VANDAL but the original author has only told part of the story.

Feel free to email me at pa25235c@gmail.com

PS your pages are not easy to navigate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piper PA25235C (talk • contribs) 21:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

• Hello Piper PA25235C. I have moved your comment down to the bottom and given it a topic header.

I have not termed you a vandal in my templated message on your Talk page, I do however note that your information, which I have reverted, is unsourced. If you could please add a citation, it will help your assertions, which are in my view likely.

Misplaced Pages can indeed be confusing for new editors. We run on verifiability as a core concept, per WP:V, and sourcing reqirements per WP:RS. Please read these links carefully, and understand their importance.

Again, I personally don't doubt you, but these policies I mention require sources for big additions to the encyclopedia. If you dont know how to cite material, look at how other material in the article has been sourced, on the edit screen. I hope this helps, and best wishes to you. Jusdafax (talk) 04:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Marky Cielo Suicide Issues

Marky Cielo committed Suicide by hanging in there house in Antipolo City because of his Gay Manager wanted to spread their Sex Video in The Public threatening him . His mother Mildred avoid the Police Autopsy and Forensic investigation . On the Funeral his body wearing a Turtle Neck Shirt to hide the scars on his neck . His Family hide the truth about his Death . After his burial Marky Cielo Tomb Park became a Tourist Attraction in Barangay Sinto Bauko Mountain Province between Cadaweng Compound and MIA"S Muffins Houzz Cafe and Restaurant . Mormons 1111 (talk) 10:04, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• Greetings. Please read and understand the Misplaced Pages verifiability policy at WP:V and the sourcing requirements at WP:RS. The short version is this: information, especially controversial material, must be sourced. I am reverting the article again, please do not restore your edit until you can source it, thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 10:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Lime

My name is Robb Cooper and I am the personal manager for the duo known as Lime. I edited the content and explained why.

Two impostors named Joy Dorris and Robert Hubertz have been performing illegally as Lime. They've never sung a notebon any Lime song and we've already begun legal action.

That said, please feel free to contact me at 760-464-0500 or 800-617-8161 or robb@robbcoopermediamanagement.net and ill be happy to put you in contact with the record company, producer and our attorney.

These two imposter seriously diminish the authentication that Misplaced Pages thrives on.

Thank you. LIME MANAGER (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

• Hello. This may well be true, but you need a reliable source per WP:RS as a citation (WP:CITE) in the article to confirm that. I suggest you find an article in the media regarding the changes you wish to make that supports your contentions. Please remember that you must use a reliable source per WP:RS. Misplaced Pages is built on the concept of verifiability per WP:V. Since you are a new editor, it's clear you don't yet understand how the encyclopedia works. I am an unpaid volunteer, and don't call people on the phone to verify information or changes to articles. New editors are often puzzled when they start editing here, because there is a lot to learn about the way this place works. Take your time. Also please be aware of the three revert rule per WP:3RR. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 21:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for the barnstar. I appreciate it as an incentive to continue editing -- and to try to be a better wikipedian. Smallchief (talk) 20:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks for the thanks. I've been an admirer of your Wiki-skills for a decade or so, and salute you with good humor. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 23:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

To: Justafax

Sorry, that was just a test from now on I will use my sandbox. Vampiredragon999 (talk) 02:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Arent you a little too speedy with the speedy deletion notice ?

Hi Jusdafax, Arent you a bit too fast to stick a tag for Speedydeletion in my userspace? I havent even hardly started writing the article. I do think I know a little the rules of Misplaced Pages, see my contributions especially at the Dutch Misplaced Pages. Thanks in advance for removing the tag? --Chescargot (talk) 18:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Allow me to suggest that you copy the article and create a draft article per WP:Drafts. While it is true that WP:User pages allows article drafts in subpages, these subpages are often abused for promotional purposes at odds with the purpose of Misplaced Pages, which brings us to this situation. I see you have contested my nomination, which is your right, of course. An admin will be the judge of this. Pending that decision, I again suggest the course suggested in my first sentence. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. In line with your advice I created a draft article to copy the text there, but then the text was already removed, regardless my contest (which I thought would buy me some time)... --Chescargot (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

I did too. My apologies. Jusdafax (talk) 19:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

BLP

I believe that you are in breach of Misplaced Pages's BLP guidelines. Please immediately restore the page as I wrote it and make no further changes until we have referred these matters to Misplaced Pages administrators.

Lisa Gorton's secondary schooling is not on topic, and private information.

It is also incomplete information: Lisa attended Preshil for longer than she attended St Catherine's. Your Misplaced Pages version relies on an interview with St Catherine's school which is littered with inaccuracies.

Lisa did not study poetry under Chris Wallace-Crabbe; or, only with him among many other professors of literature at the University: she did not complete a creative writing degree.

You have also incorrectly named Lisa's undergraduate degree, which is a BA (Hons). The 'Hons' is a year-long addition to the Arts degree.

You have also incorrectly named Lisa's graduate degree. Lisa did not complete a Master of Arts at Oxford. That is a different kind of degree. She completed an MPhil in Renaissance Literature.

Lisa did not win the John Donne Society Award for Distinguished Publication in Donne Studies for her doctorate. She received it for an essay.

Lisa did not work for Scaffidi Hugh-Jones. She was an independent, freelance communication consultant. However, the information is private, and not on topic; and, if career information is to be included, your version is skewed and unrepresentative. Lisa has undertaken many other jobs at various times.

Lisa has never been a full-time writer.

The rest of your article is a stub, and, as such, misrepresents Lisa's writing life. It does not include anthologies that she has edited and been published in; it does not include public events in which she has participated; it does not include all her publications.

Lisa's grandparents are not on-topic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Jusdafax&action=edit&section=new

Livingpersonedits (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

• Editor blocked by an admin for edit warring. Jusdafax (talk) 02:12, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

AA

how were they not constructive. All factually correct and supported by citations many of which I included years ago. This seems like a bot like reversal.

• Greetings, IP. Please remember to sign your Talk page posts and to place them at the bottom, at least on my Talk page. it appears I made a mistake in this revert, and I will restore your edits. My apologies, and best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 23:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. It’s heartening to see humility and good faith in action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.60.170.151 (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Aladdin

Do not undo someone's edit without discussing it first. You asked me to cite a plot element from the story Aladdin itself? How about you read the story that is the subject of the article (and the SOURCE of my information) before showing your ignorance and demanding a source. DO NOT undo MY edit without discussing it with me first. Or you would be guilty of an edit war. See how that works?

• It appears you have either learned from others regarding your editing and discussion tone, or have lost interest in collaboratively building an encyclopedia. Good fortunes to you. Jusdafax (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

UAPTF assesment

Hey thanks for setting up the Pentagon UAP report article, I've expanded it following most of your content into Background, Report (and maybe in the future "Reactions") sections, let me know what you think of it in the Talk page or here and further help would be much appreciated! --Loganmac (talk) 07:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your note, that article stub was my last editing before a multi-week Wikibreak. At first glance your work appears correct and proper. I'll go back and take a longer look soon. Thanks again! Jusdafax (talk) 21:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Looks like there is consensus, or very close to it, for renaming Pentagon UFO Report. You recognized that possibility when you created the article. Your input would be appreciated for doing the rename if you have experience in that process. Thanks. 5Q5| 11:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Nigerian Air Force

Hi Jusdafax, I moved the content to "Accidents and Incidents" section.

It was formerly under "History" which shouldn't. It was not deleted.

But thanks for the heads up. Militaryafrica (talk) 01:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• Copy that. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 00:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

G13

Hi Jusdafax, I've noticed that you have been tagging some user subpages marked with {{User sandbox}} for deletion using {{db-afc}}. Please note that WP:G13 only applies to userspace if it is tagged with {{AFC submission}} or contains article wizard placeholder text only, and not to user sandboxes without the AFC template. Thank you. ✗plicit 00:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

• Good to know, thanks. I've been looking into sandboxes over 6 months old which appear to be abandonded, or are just vandalism. What should I tag them with, using Huggle? Jusdafax (talk) 00:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

• If the sandboxes don't meet any of the speedy deletion criteria, they can simply be left untouched. There is WP:MFD, but consensus there historically opposes deletion of harmless sandboxes just sitting around. ✗plicit 01:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

• Seeing some interesting info at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts and still digging. Jusdafax (talk) 01:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SAIEWsaiew

A tag has been placed on User:SAIEWsaiew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Misplaced Pages's goals. Please note that Misplaced Pages is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Really guy? Barely on Misplaced Pages for 24 hours and you request my user page be deleted? Come on guy! SAIEWsaiew (talk) 02:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

• Really. I nominated your page and it was deleted by an administrator. Please review WP:UserPage to understand Misplaced Pages's policies, which your User Page did not conform to. "Misplaced Pages is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site." Jusdafax (talk) 03:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Reverted edited back on 'Pope Francis'

Hello Jusdafax, this is User:PopeClementXV. I have reverted my edit back on Pope Francis. The removal was intentional, as I have created the new page Pope Francis bibliography, where all the content can be found. Thank you for the heads up though, I forgot to include a removal reason initially, which I have now done. PopeClementXV(talk) 16:51, 31 October 2021 (PST)

• Fair enough, thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 03:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi

Saw that you commented on my page that has since been deleted Grace Elizabeth Wilkinson (talk) 06:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Continued vandalism on Maccabean Revolt

An IP continues to vandalize Maccabean Revolt, despite your revert and mine :( 185.13.106.222 (talk) 03:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

• The IP has been blocked by an admin, thanks! Jusdafax (talk) 05:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you kindly! Nine years sure goes by fast... cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 07:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

LLVM

Acronyms should be publicly listed on the Internet. The obfuscation of verbal technology (acronyms) is one of the events that helped collapsed the Roman empire. If you let people like LLVM and CVS declare "an acronym is no longer an acronym, because it suits us, and helps you forget we have a past," then infirmity is afoot!

Change the site to list the original meaning and words behind LLVM! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.11.187.188 (talk) 02:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Interested in Stephanie Cutter article?

Hi Jusdafax, I saw that you were interested in biographies of political figures on WikiProject Biography. Would you have any interest in the requests I made of the Stephanie Cutter article? Though not an elected official, she's been in politics for a long time. In my requests I've done my best to use only top-tier sources and make requests within the rules of Misplaced Pages, so hopefully these requests are easy! I am trying to follow the conflict of interest process so I'm not making any of these edits myself. Please let me know if you're interested! PrecisionChristian (talk) 17:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

• Greetings. The entry you noticed was one I made back in 2016, and I'm currently staying out of politicians' articles except to revert vandalism or in some cases, unsourced material. I have now adjusted my entry accordingly. Thanks for thinking of me, however! Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 15:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

You're very welcome! Thank you for letting me know! PrecisionChristian (talk) 13:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Werewolves of London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lindley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

It all makes sense now about my life

I knew it! 32.140.13.82 (talk) 07:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of best-selling music artists on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Fifteenth anniversary on Misplaced Pages!

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Jusdafax! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! 15th Chris Troutman (talk) 12:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you, and also for the invite below... woo hoo! Jusdafax (talk) 03:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Jusdafax,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Misplaced Pages project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 12:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• Hey thanks Chris! I will be honored to join you and the group, even though it makes me feel incredibly ancient. I never dreamed in 2007 I'd be here now. Cheers to you and the rest of the Society, and thanks again for the kindly invitation, which I truly appreciate! Jusdafax (talk) 03:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you kindly, it's certainly been a day for reflection about Misplaced Pages and my years of involvement here. I'm much obliged to you and the Birthday Committee! Jusdafax (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Jusdafax! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU 20:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks Captain, and it's been an interesting experience to date, to say the least. I'm not sure I have another 15 years left in me, but the spirit is willing, despite some discouraging factors, and there are encouraging developments as well... and the Wiki-Love messages are encouraging, I must admit. It's nice to be acknowledged! Jusdafax (talk) 05:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

2006 in Iraq

I removed two double links and fixed a redirect. Hope you understand. 70.54.150.70 (talk) 22:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• First off, you are editing without using edit summaries, as the edit screen clearly requests where it says "Briefly describe your changes." Doing so is important because it helps vandal patrollers like myself to understand your intent. Secondly, seeing that your second edit to the article left the sentence you edited incomplete, I found good reason to revert your edits. I hope you will learn from this experience, since you started editing Misplaced Pages less than a week ago, and use edit summaries from now on, as well as make an effort to edit the encyclopedia competently by reviewing your edits before publishing them, as well as afterwards. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 22:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

  So are you going to honor my edit and revert your revert of my edit? 70.54.150.70 (talk) 03:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

  I have now fixed the entry for March as noted in my edit summary, and, since I see in your edit history that you have yet to do so, again remind you that making edit summaries saves your fellow editors time and effort. Jusdafax (talk) 03:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}}

Donner60 (talk) 04:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Jusdafax!

Happy New Year!

Jusdafax,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
— Moops 04:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops 04:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you ...

.. for having the courage to speak up at ANI. And I agree with what you said about comments at ITN/C. – Sca (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

And thanks again today. -- Sca (talk) 15:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

...you are welcome. I just took a look, and I see it's turned into a pile-on. My advice now is to drop the appeal and work elsewhere on the 'pedia. Give it a longer time like six months or a year. Work on articles and subjects that interest you, get some good article creation/expansion work done, or perhaps tackle the humble but highly needful field of vandal patrolling, where help is always needed. Keep it low stress, make the Wiki better, and you will get the block lifted down the road. Here's to a happier 2023... Best Wishes! Jusdafax (talk) 04:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Can you email me?

You're not email-able here. Happy editing! Atsme 💬 📧 13:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Atsme! I assure you my listed email works, because I get a steady supply of WP-bot notifications there. Are you sending to jusdafax.wikipedia@gmail.com ? Jusdafax (talk) 14:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

???? - sent to the addy you gave. I think you have to activate it in your preferences, maybe? Atsme 💬 📧 16:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Right. Try it now. Jusdafax (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Englewood, Kansas

Englewood, KS is a ghost town. The population used to be in the hundreds and is now less than 100. The source was already provided in the article. I would ask that you please re-instate the edit I made. 69.14.225.92 (talk) 23:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

• According to the U.S. Census in the second sentence of the article, the population is 58, which is indeed under 100. The Misplaced Pages article Ghost town is inconclusive on a definition. I'm declining your request both as a courtesy to the remaining residents and more importantly a matter of my deferring to the online Encyclopedia Britiannica definition: "a town that no longer has any people living in it : an abandoned town." You are free, of course, to contest my reasoning on the article Talk page and see if you can get a consenus. Jusdafax (talk) 00:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks again. I appreciate it, if after a delay since your post. Jusdafax (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

SmallCat dispute case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 4, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 13:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted for the SmallCat dispute case

The proposed decision in the SmallCat dispute has been posted. You are invited to review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 10:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Apologies

I didn't read your edit carefully at User talk:Deadshot78 and assumed it was for Chandrayaan-3 – thanks for reverting my error. Celjski Grad (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

• All good. Deadshot78 appears to be a problem editor, and a record of their doings will help keep track of their questionable edits. Thanks for your note, and best wishes! Jusdafax (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 05:58, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

• Thank you, I appreciate thinking back to those innocent days. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 06:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

talk page semi-protected

Hi there, I'm a new user and I wanted to post 2 very recent articles to David Grusch talk page to be discussed, but it was semi-protected. I was wondering if you can post it there instead:

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/12/us/politics/ufos-aliens-classified-briefing.html https://archive.is/CTvNC

2. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/jan/14/what-happens-if-we-have-been-visited-by-aliens-lied-to-ufos-uaps-grusch-congress John-w-Buchanan (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

• I have restored your post here, which I was startled to see was deleted without my knowledge. Now it appears you have been blocked for socking, a serious offense on Misplaced Pages. However, I appreciate the heads up on the NYT article, which I have not read. I’ll try to take a look at it. This topic, UFO’s/UAP’s, is quite contentious both on Misplaced Pages and worldwide, and in my view dubious tactics are in play by various parties. I strongly suggest you refrain from further sockpuppet activity. If you establish a record of good contributions on other WikiMedia projects, you may be able to succeed in appealing your block down the road. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 23:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification: Feedback request service is down

Hello, Jusdafax

You may have noticed that you have not received any messages from the Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service for over a month. Yapperbot appears to have stopped delivering messages. Until that can be resolved, please watch pages that interest you, such as Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

This notification has been sent to you as you are subscribed to the Feedback Request Service. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages talk:Help Project on a "Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy) on a "Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages talk:Criteria for speedy deletion on a "Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:New York City on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of best-selling Sega Dreamcast games on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Ref formatting walkthrough

Hi,

I wanted to give you a quick rundown on the ref formatting process.

Taking the ref you added most recently to the Calls for Joe Biden to suspend his 2024 United States presidential campaign as an example, it's a good start.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Calls_for_Joe_Biden_to_suspend_his_2024_United_States_presidential_campaign&diff=1234137653&oldid=1234135759

You just need to add the opening and closing brackets before and after the ref tags. Then add a few key ref parameters, like "|title=", "|url=", "date=", "|work=" and "|last1=|first1=", too (this one can change depending on the article; it's sometimes "|author=").

That's pretty much it. Let me know if you have any questions.

Hope this is helpful.

David O. Johnson (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Twisters (film) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Twitter on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Jusdafax! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

• Thank you. I have commented in the past on receiving this notice to the effect that that day in 2007 seems long ago to me, and at this moment I am again struck by the truth of that sentiment. Jusdafax (talk) 10:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy) on a "Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Eurovision on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of tallest buildings and structures in the Birmingham Metropolitan Area, West Midlands on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy) on a "Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abdel Fattah el-Sisi on a "Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages talk:What Misplaced Pages is not on a "Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages talk:Tambayan Philippines/Sources on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)