Misplaced Pages:Here to build an encyclopedia: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:19, 27 July 2014 editMeters (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers172,962 editsm Reverted edits by Trueblute (talk) to last version by Anon126← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 08:45, 24 December 2024 edit undoRemsense (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Template editors63,000 edits Undid revision 1264948350 by Luigifan (talk) correct beforeTags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App undo
(530 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{short description\|Misplaced Pages explanatory supplement}}
⚫	{{~~Infopage~~\|WP:HERE}}
			{{supplement\|interprets=] and ] policy and guideline pages\|WP:HTBAE\|WP:BUILDWP}}
⚫	{{nutshell\|Wikipedians are here to build an encyclopedia, i.e., a neutral public reference work on ~~certain~~ topics. Users whose behavior suggests they are here for some other purpose ].}}

		⚫	{{nutshell\|Wikipedians are here to build an encyclopedia, i.e., a neutral, reliable public reference work on notable topics. Users whose behavior suggests they are here for some other purpose ].}}
⚫	A ~~major~~ ] of Misplaced Pages is that ~~editors~~ ~~are~~ ~~here~~ ~~purely~~ to ~~build~~ an ~~encyclopedia~~. This means that a ~~user~~ is here primarily to help improve encyclopedia articles and content, and to provide constructive input into communal discussions and processes aimed at improving the project and the quality of our content, and do so in line with the project's ], ], and ]. Because Misplaced Pages is a ] ], ~~users~~ whose personal agendas and actions appear to conflict with its purpose risk having their editing privileges removed.

			{{Quote\|Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia: {{#lst:Misplaced Pages:Five pillars\|5p1}}\|]}}
⚫	The expression "here to build an encyclopedia" is a long-standing rule used to distinguish constructive and non-constructive users and pages. It has been written at various times into the ]~~, ],~~ and older versions of ].

			] like the '']''{{nbsp}}... except Misplaced Pages is ]: ''Britannica'' has about 120,000 articles, while the English Misplaced Pages has over {{#expr:floor({{NUMBEROFARTICLES:R}}/10^6)}} million articles.]]
⚫	== ~~Being~~ here to build an encyclopedia ==

		⚫	A ] of Misplaced Pages is that it is both an encyclopedia and a community of editors who build it. This means that an editor is here primarily to help improve encyclopedia articles and content, and to provide constructive input into communal discussions and processes aimed at improving the project and the quality of our content, and do so in line with the project's ], ], and ] – and within compliance of Misplaced Pages's ]. Because Misplaced Pages is a ] ], editors whose personal agendas and actions appear to conflict with its purpose risk having their editing privileges removed.
⚫	~~Signs~~ ~~that~~ a user ~~may~~ be here to build an encyclopedia ~~include~~:

		⚫	The expression "here to build an encyclopedia" is a long-standing rule used to distinguish constructive and non-constructive users and pages. It has been written at various times into the ] and older versions of the ].
⚫	; Genuine interest and improvement: A genuine interest in improving the encyclopedic content (articles and media). This often involves a wide range of interests, and substantive edits/article writing or other significant activities (e.g., coding, ], or ]). It may also include significant constructive improvements to the processes that are involved in improving content, or mitigating and reducing problems that make a negative contribution to Misplaced Pages.
⚫	; Respect for core editing standards: Behaving in accordance with core agreed policies when editing, including policies on content, and ~~policies on~~ behavior.
⚫	; A focus on encyclopedia building: Non-encyclopedia-related contributions kept to a limited level, in comparison to positive and directly constructive contributions to the encyclopedia or its editorial processes.
⚫	; Self-correction and heeding lessons: When mistakes are made, there is visible effort to learn from them; ~~the~~ user appears to take editing seriously and ~~improve~~ their editorial ability and ~~their~~ quality of input.

	== ~~Not being~~ here to build an encyclopedia ==		== Being here to build an encyclopedia ==
			{{redirect\|WP:HERE\|use of the word on Misplaced Pages's talk pages\|Misplaced Pages:Here (talk)}}
		⚫	{{shortcut\|WP:HERE}}
		⚫	Signs that a user may be here to build an encyclopedia include:

		⚫	; Genuine interest and improvement: A genuine interest in improving the encyclopedic content (articles and media). This often involves a wide range of interests, and substantive edits/article writing or other significant activities (e.g., coding, ], or ]). It may also include significant constructive improvements to the processes that are involved in improving content, or mitigating and reducing problems that make a negative contribution to Misplaced Pages.
⚫	{{shortcut\|WP:NOTHERE}}
		⚫	; Respect for core editing standards: Behaving in accordance with core agreed policies when editing, including policies on content and behavior.
		⚫	; A focus on encyclopedia building: Non-encyclopedia-related contributions are kept to a limited level in comparison with positive and directly constructive contributions to the encyclopedia and/or its editorial processes.
		⚫	; Self-correction and heeding lessons: When mistakes are made, there is visible effort to learn from them. The user appears to take editing seriously and improves their editorial ability and quality of input.

	~~Indications~~ ~~that a user may~~ not be here to build an encyclopedia ~~include:~~		== Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia ==
			{{redirect\|WP:NOTHERE\|information about leaving the project\|Misplaced Pages:Retiring\|referring discussions elsewhere\|Template:NOTHERE}}

			{{redirect\|WP:BADFAITH\|the behavioral guideline\|Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith\|the humor essay\|Misplaced Pages:Assume bad faith}}
⚫	; Narrow self interest ~~and/~~or promotion: Narrow self-interested or promotional activity in article writing (see ]).
		⚫	{{shortcut\|WP:NOTHERE\|WP:!HERE\|WP:CNH}}
⚫	; Focusing on Misplaced Pages as a social networking site: A primary focus on Misplaced Pages as a social networking space (resumes, social media type pages, etc.) ~~(see~~ ]).
		⚫	The following may indicate a user is not here to build an encyclopedia:
⚫	; General pattern of disruptive behavior: A long term history of disruptive behavior with little or no sign of ~~other~~ intentions.
		⚫	; Narrow self-interest or promotion of themselves or their business: Narrow self-interested or promotional activity in article writing (see ]).
⚫	; Treating editing as a battleground: Excessive ], ], ], and the like, may suggest a user is here to fight rather than here to build an encyclopedia. If a user has a dispute, then they are expected to place the benefit of the project at a high priority and seek ]. A user whose anger causes them to obsess may find the fight has become their focus, not encyclopedia writing.
		⚫	; General pattern of ]: A long-term history of disruptive behavior with little or no sign of positive intentions.
⚫	; Dishonest and gaming behaviors: ], ], and other forms of editorial dishonesty. Misplaced Pages broadly works on a basis of trust, and such activities undermine that trust and suggest other motives such as "lulz" (amusement at destructiveness or ]) or a complete lack of interest in good editing conduct practices.
			; Trying to score brownie points outside of Misplaced Pages: Edits intended for the sole purpose of impressing or amusing third parties outside of Misplaced Pages, without expecting the edit to remain in place or caring if it doesn't. Examples include edits to articles related to one's religion intended to score points with one's deity(ies), editing the name of one's significant other into the article "]", or editing an article of someone you may admire to be opinionated in favor of them.
⚫	; Little or no interest in working collaboratively: Extreme lack of interest in working constructively and ~~in a cooperative manner~~ with the community where the views of other users may differ; extreme lack of interest in heeding others' legitimate concerns; interest in furthering rather than mitigating conflict.
		⚫	; Treating editing as a battleground: Excessive ], ], ], and the like, may suggest a user is here to fight rather than here to build an encyclopedia. If a user has a dispute, then they are expected to place the benefit of the project at a high priority and seek ]. A user whose anger causes them to obsess may find the fight has become their focus, not encyclopedia writing.
⚫	; Major or irreconcilable conflict of attitude or intention: Major conflicts of attitude, concerning Misplaced Pages-related activity. A user may ~~have~~ extreme or even criminal views or lifestyle in some areas, or be repugnant to other users, and yet be here to "build an encyclopedia". ~~However some~~ activities are ~~by nature~~ inconsistent with editing access, such as legal threats against other users, harassment, or actions off-site that suggest a grossly divergent intention or gross undermining of the project as a whole. Editors must be able to relax collegially together. There is a level of divergence of fundamental attitudes, whether in editing or to the project as a whole, at which this may not be reasonable to expect.
		⚫	; Dishonest and gaming behaviors: ], ], and other forms of editorial dishonesty. Misplaced Pages broadly works on a basis of trust, and such activities undermine that trust and suggest other motives such as "lulz" (amusement at destructiveness or ]) or a complete lack of interest in good editing conduct practices.
⚫	; ~~Inconsistent long~~-term agenda: Users who, based on substantial Misplaced Pages-related evidence, seem to ~~want~~ editing rights only to legitimize a soapbox or other personal stance, to engage in some basic editing not so much to "build an encyclopedia" as to assert a claim to be a "productive editor", ~~where by~~ their ~~own~~ words or actions ~~their~~ ~~true~~ longer-term motive is ~~more likely to be~~ "~~not~~ here to build an encyclopedia".
		⚫	; {{anchor\|COLLABORATE}} Little or no interest in working collaboratively: Extreme lack of interest in working constructively and cooperatively with the community where the views of other users may differ; extreme lack of interest in heeding others' legitimate concerns; interest in furthering rather than mitigating conflict like ] for ], ], ], ], or ].
⚫	; Having a long-term or "extreme" history that suggests a marked lack of value for the project's actual aims and methods: This may include repeated chances and warnings, all of which were flouted upon return, or promises to change that proved insincere, were gamed, or otherwise the word or spirit was not actually kept.
		⚫	; Major or irreconcilable conflict of attitude or intention: Major conflicts of attitude, concerning Misplaced Pages-related activity. A user may espouse extreme or even criminal views or lifestyle in some areas, or be repugnant to other users, and yet be here to "build an encyclopedia". Some activities are naturally inconsistent with editing access, such as legal threats against other users, harassment, or actions off-site that suggest a grossly divergent intention or gross undermining of the project as a whole. Editors must be able to relax collegially together. Maintaining ] is ] in every exchange. There is a level of divergence of fundamental attitudes, whether in editing or to the project as a whole, at which this may not be reasonable to expect.
		⚫	;{{anchor\|AGENDA}}Long-term agenda inconsistent with building an encyclopedia: Users who, based on substantial Misplaced Pages-related evidence, seem to use ] only to legitimize a soapbox or other personal stance (i.e. engage in some basic editing not so much to "build an encyclopedia" as to be able to assert a claim to be a "productive editor"... when their words or actions indicate a longer-term motive inconsistent with "here to build an encyclopedia").
		⚫	; Having a long-term or "extreme" history that suggests a marked lack of value for the project's actual aims and methods: This may include repeated chances and warnings, all of which were flouted upon return, or promises to change that proved insincere or were gamed, or otherwise the word or spirit was not actually kept.
			; Interest in gaining as many user rights or "awards" as possible (or overly focusing on rights in general): The user wants to gain ] as possible or focuses a lot of attention on ] through ]. While having ] is not negative overall, claiming them and ] as a right and not a privilege is damaging and not the goal of these things.
		⚫	; Focusing on Misplaced Pages as a social networking site: A primary focus on Misplaced Pages as a social networking space (resumes, social media type pages, etc.). See ] for more information.
			; Editing only in user space: The user is only interested in editing their own user space or in draft space with no sign of making the draft live.

	== What "not here to build an encyclopedia" is not ==		== What "not here to build an encyclopedia" is not ==
		⚫	{{shortcut\|WP:NOTNOTHERE\|WP:NNH}}

		⚫	Some users may be interested in building an encyclopedia in accordance with Misplaced Pages's principles, but with different areas of focus or approach to some other users' goals or emphases. Differences that arise where both users are in ] hoping to improve the project should not be mistaken for "not being here to build an encyclopedia".
⚫	{{shortcut\|WP:NOTNOTHERE}}
		⚫	; {{anchor\|niche}} Focusing on niche topic areas: A user may have an interest in an obscure topic that other users find trivial, or may post contents that are difficult to comprehend. Diversity in interests and inputs from specialists in many fields help us function as a comprehensive encyclopedia. Even if you have never heard of a certain obscure school of 16th-century philosophy or a little-known physics theorem, it merits a Misplaced Pages article if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources – even if those sources are printed books and specialist academic journals.

		⚫	; {{anchor\|processes}} Focusing on particular processes: A user may have an interest in creating stubs, tagging articles for cleanup, improving article compliance with the ], or nominating articles for deletion. These are essential activities that improve the encyclopedia in indirect ways. Many "behind the scenes" processes and activities are essential to allow tens of thousands of users to edit collectively. Not every editor needs to perform "on stage", by creating articles and drafting new guidelines.
⚫	Some users may be interested in building an encyclopedia in accordance with Misplaced Pages's principles, but with different areas of focus or approach to some other users' goals or emphases. Differences that arise where both users are in ] hoping to improve the project should not be mistaken for "not being here to build an encyclopedia".
		⚫	; {{anchor\|amendments}} Advocating amendments to policies or guidelines: The community encompasses a very wide range of views. A user may believe a communal norm is too narrow or poorly approaches an issue, and take actions internally consistent with that viewpoint, such as advocating particular positions in discussions. Provided the user does so in an honest attempt to improve the encyclopedia, in a constructive manner, and assuming the user's actions are not themselves disruptive, such conversations form the genesis for improvement to Misplaced Pages.

		⚫	; {{anchor\|norms}}<span style="font-weight:initial">{{shortcut\|WP:NOTHERENORMS}}</span> Difficulty, in good faith, with conduct norms: A number of users wish to edit, but find it overly hard to adapt to conduct norms such as ], avoiding personal attacks, or even some content policies such as not adding their ] in their edits. These would be dealt with through ], simplified suggestions on how to contribute or reediting the content to the style and standards of Misplaced Pages. In a small number of cases this may lead to a friendly ] with warnings or even bans in some long term cases. Failure to adapt to a norm is not – by itself – evidence that a user is not trying to contribute productively. Some users might require ], so don't be ].
⚫	; Focusing on niche topic areas: A user may have an interest in a topic that other users find trivial or post contents that are difficult to comprehend. Diversity in interests and inputs from specialists in many fields help us function as a comprehensive encyclopedia.
		⚫	; {{anchor\|unpopular}} Expressing unpopular opinions in a non-disruptive manner: Merely advocating and implementing changes to Misplaced Pages articles or policies with reliable sources is allowed; even if these ] made are incompatible with certain Misplaced Pages ], it is not the same as not being here to build an encyclopedia. The disagreeing editor should take care to not violate Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines such as ] and ] in the course of challenging unpopular opinions.
⚫	; Focusing on particular processes: A user may have an interest in creating stubs, tagging articles for cleanup, improving article compliance with the ], or nominating articles for deletion. These are essential activities that improve the encyclopedia in indirect ways. Many "behind the scenes" processes and activities are essential to allow tens of thousands of users to edit collectively. ~~Some~~ ~~articles~~ do ~~not~~ ~~belong~~ in ~~Misplaced Pages,~~ ~~others should be improved~~, ~~and~~ ~~new~~ articles ~~are~~ ~~often~~ ~~appropriately created in an unfinished~~ ~~state~~.
⚫	; Advocating amendments to policies or guidelines: The community encompasses a very wide range of views. A user may believe a communal norm is too narrow or poorly approaches an issue, and take actions internally consistent with that viewpoint, such as advocating particular positions in discussions. Provided the user does so in an honest attempt to improve the encyclopedia, in a constructive manner, and assuming the user's actions are not themselves disruptive, such conversations form the genesis for improvement to Misplaced Pages.
⚫	; Difficulty in good faith, with conduct norms: A number of users wish to edit, but find it overly hard to adapt to conduct norms such as collaborative editing, avoiding personal attacks, or even some content policies such as ] in their edits. ~~While~~ ~~these~~ ~~can~~ lead to ~~warnings,~~ blocks or even bans in some cases, ~~failure~~ to adapt to a norm is not, by itself, evidence that a user is not ''trying'' to contribute productively.
⚫	; ~~Expressing~~ unpopular ~~opinions – even extremely~~ unpopular opinions – in a non-disruptive manner: Merely advocating changes to Misplaced Pages articles or policies, even if ~~those~~ changes are incompatible with Misplaced Pages's ~~principles~~, is not the same as not being here to build an encyclopedia. The ~~dissenting~~ editor should take care to not violate Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines such as ], ~~], and ] in the course of ~~expressing~~ unpopular opinions.~~

	== Review behavior as a whole ==		== Review behavior as a whole ==
			{{main\|Vandalism on Misplaced Pages\|Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers\|Misplaced Pages:Postulate absence of malice}}

			In an attempt to regulate edits that can have a surface appearance of ], some editors may give in to ]. In this case, an editor should not engage in ] and should follow policies. They should not give in to ] like ] and ]. A newcomer or a constructive user may at times make the occasional error, and they may ] to acclimatize their conduct to the community's ways and norms. It is even possible for a well-rounded user to make mistakes. ] and it is an acceptable practice to ] and unappreciated to make it about ] for personal stat scores/ trophy collecting. In addition, a number of disruptive users may at times post ] edits only at intervals in order to avoid being blocked. Be ] in these cases, ], provide ] and for complex cases request ]. Alternatively, if you are confident and have good ] and ], attempt to solve minor conflicts at the article’s ]. Be ] with the outcome, there is ] and the project is always a ].
	{{main\|Misplaced Pages:Gaming the system}}

		⚫	Being "here to build an encyclopedia" is about a user's overall purpose and behavior in editing Misplaced Pages. In considering whether or not a user is here to build an encyclopedia, the user's overall pattern of editing and contributing behavior, as well as the clarity of past warnings (dismissing vacuous warnings) or guidance and their attempts at improvement, should be reviewed as a whole.
	A number of disruptive users may at times post constructive edits, in order to avoid being blocked, or may attempt to give ] the surface appearance of positive edits. In addition, a constructive user may at times make the occasional error, and a genuine newcomer ] to acclimatize their conduct to the community's ways and norms.

⚫	Being "here to build an encyclopedia" is about a user's overall purpose and behavior in editing Misplaced Pages. In considering whether or not a user is here to build an encyclopedia, the user's overall pattern of editing and behavior, as well as the clarity of past warnings or guidance and their attempts at improvement, should be reviewed as a whole.

	== Other content ==		== Other content ==
			{{see\|Misplaced Pages:Project namespace#Content}}
		⚫	Because Misplaced Pages is a community as well as an encyclopedia, the community tolerates a reasonable degree of non-encyclopedic content. Examples include certain humor pages that are not derogatory, userboxes, and a wide range of user page designs.

		⚫	Pages that stray too far outside this are frequently ]. This is especially the case if it appears to the community that their primary author is not mainly here to write an encyclopedia. Examples include social network pages and promotional material in user-space, negative pages about other users, "laundry lists" of complaints, cliques and self-selecting or "restricted membership" user-created bodies, and non-project material likely to prove overly disruptive or divisive.
⚫	Because Misplaced Pages is a community as well as an encyclopedia, the community tolerates a reasonable degree of non-encyclopedic content. Examples include certain humor pages, userboxes, and a wide range of user page designs.

⚫	~~However, pages~~ that stray too far outside this are frequently deleted under community processes. This is especially the case if it appears to the community that their primary author is not mainly here to write an encyclopedia. Examples include social network pages and promotional material in user-space, negative pages about other users, "laundry lists" of complaints, cliques and self-selecting or "restricted membership" user-created bodies ~~felt by the wider community not to serve the encyclopedia~~, and non-project material likely to prove overly disruptive or divisive.

	== See also ==		== See also ==

	Purpose of Misplaced Pages:		Purpose of Misplaced Pages:

	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
Line 66:		Line 70:

	Editorial actions on Misplaced Pages:		Editorial actions on Misplaced Pages:
			* ]

	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
			* ]
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
			* ]
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]

	Unregistered contributor participation:		Unregistered contributor participation:

	* ]		* ]

	Page content:		Page content:

	* ]		* ]
	{{Essays on building Misplaced Pages}}		{{Essays on building Misplaced Pages}}

			]]

Latest revision as of 08:45, 24 December 2024

Misplaced Pages explanatory supplement

This is an explanatory essay about the content and behavioral policy and guideline pages.
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community.

Shortcuts

Explanatory essay

This page in a nutshell: Wikipedians are here to build an encyclopedia, i.e., a neutral, reliable public reference work on notable topics. Users whose behavior suggests they are here for some other purpose risk being blocked or banned.

Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia: Misplaced Pages combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers. Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a social network, a vanity press, an experiment in anarchy or democracy, an indiscriminate collection of information, nor a web directory. It is not a dictionary, a newspaper, nor a collection of source documents, although some of its fellow Wikimedia projects are.
— Misplaced Pages:Five pillars

A major pillar of Misplaced Pages is that it is both an encyclopedia and a community of editors who build it. This means that an editor is here primarily to help improve encyclopedia articles and content, and to provide constructive input into communal discussions and processes aimed at improving the project and the quality of our content, and do so in line with the project's intended boundaries, guidelines, and wider mission – and within compliance of Misplaced Pages's policies and procedures. Because Misplaced Pages is a collaborative community, editors whose personal agendas and actions appear to conflict with its purpose risk having their editing privileges removed.

The expression "here to build an encyclopedia" is a long-standing rule used to distinguish constructive and non-constructive users and pages. It has been written at various times into the five pillars of Misplaced Pages and older versions of the blocking policy.

Being here to build an encyclopedia

"WP:HERE" redirects here. For use of the word on Misplaced Pages's talk pages, see Misplaced Pages:Here (talk). Shortcut

WP:HERE

Signs that a user may be here to build an encyclopedia include:

Genuine interest and improvement: A genuine interest in improving the encyclopedic content (articles and media). This often involves a wide range of interests, and substantive edits/article writing or other significant activities (e.g., coding, patrolling, or wikignoming). It may also include significant constructive improvements to the processes that are involved in improving content, or mitigating and reducing problems that make a negative contribution to Misplaced Pages.
Respect for core editing standards: Behaving in accordance with core agreed policies when editing, including policies on content and behavior.
A focus on encyclopedia building: Non-encyclopedia-related contributions are kept to a limited level in comparison with positive and directly constructive contributions to the encyclopedia and/or its editorial processes.
Self-correction and heeding lessons: When mistakes are made, there is visible effort to learn from them. The user appears to take editing seriously and improves their editorial ability and quality of input.

Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia

"WP:NOTHERE" redirects here. For information about leaving the project, see Misplaced Pages:Retiring. For referring discussions elsewhere, see Template:NOTHERE. "WP:BADFAITH" redirects here. For the behavioral guideline, see Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith. For the humor essay, see Misplaced Pages:Assume bad faith. Shortcuts

The following may indicate a user is not here to build an encyclopedia:

Narrow self-interest or promotion of themselves or their business: Narrow self-interested or promotional activity in article writing (see WP:SPA).
General pattern of disruptive behavior: A long-term history of disruptive behavior with little or no sign of positive intentions.
Trying to score brownie points outside of Misplaced Pages: Edits intended for the sole purpose of impressing or amusing third parties outside of Misplaced Pages, without expecting the edit to remain in place or caring if it doesn't. Examples include edits to articles related to one's religion intended to score points with one's deity(ies), editing the name of one's significant other into the article "Beauty", or editing an article of someone you may admire to be opinionated in favor of them.
Treating editing as a battleground: Excessive soapboxing, escalation of disputes, repeated hostile aggressiveness, and the like, may suggest a user is here to fight rather than here to build an encyclopedia. If a user has a dispute, then they are expected to place the benefit of the project at a high priority and seek dispute resolution. A user whose anger causes them to obsess may find the fight has become their focus, not encyclopedia writing.
Dishonest and gaming behaviors: Gaming the system, socking, and other forms of editorial dishonesty. Misplaced Pages broadly works on a basis of trust, and such activities undermine that trust and suggest other motives such as "lulz" (amusement at destructiveness or schadenfreude) or a complete lack of interest in good editing conduct practices.
Little or no interest in working collaboratively: Extreme lack of interest in working constructively and cooperatively with the community where the views of other users may differ; extreme lack of interest in heeding others' legitimate concerns; interest in furthering rather than mitigating conflict like disregarding polite behavior for baiting, blocking as a means of disagreeing, diverting dispute resolutions from objectives, driving away productive editors, or ownership of articles.
Major or irreconcilable conflict of attitude or intention: Major conflicts of attitude, concerning Misplaced Pages-related activity. A user may espouse extreme or even criminal views or lifestyle in some areas, or be repugnant to other users, and yet be here to "build an encyclopedia". Some activities are naturally inconsistent with editing access, such as legal threats against other users, harassment, or actions off-site that suggest a grossly divergent intention or gross undermining of the project as a whole. Editors must be able to relax collegially together. Maintaining civility is essential in every exchange. There is a level of divergence of fundamental attitudes, whether in editing or to the project as a whole, at which this may not be reasonable to expect.
Long-term agenda inconsistent with building an encyclopedia: Users who, based on substantial Misplaced Pages-related evidence, seem to use editing rights only to legitimize a soapbox or other personal stance (i.e. engage in some basic editing not so much to "build an encyclopedia" as to be able to assert a claim to be a "productive editor"... when their words or actions indicate a longer-term motive inconsistent with "here to build an encyclopedia").
Having a long-term or "extreme" history that suggests a marked lack of value for the project's actual aims and methods: This may include repeated chances and warnings, all of which were flouted upon return, or promises to change that proved insincere or were gamed, or otherwise the word or spirit was not actually kept.
Interest in gaining as many user rights or "awards" as possible (or overly focusing on rights in general): The user wants to gain as many awards as possible or focuses a lot of attention on gaining user rights through gaming the principles. While having awards is not negative overall, claiming them and user access levels as a right and not a privilege is damaging and not the goal of these things.
Focusing on Misplaced Pages as a social networking site: A primary focus on Misplaced Pages as a social networking space (resumes, social media type pages, etc.). See WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK for more information.
Editing only in user space: The user is only interested in editing their own user space or in draft space with no sign of making the draft live.

What "not here to build an encyclopedia" is not

Shortcuts

Some users may be interested in building an encyclopedia in accordance with Misplaced Pages's principles, but with different areas of focus or approach to some other users' goals or emphases. Differences that arise where both users are in good faith hoping to improve the project should not be mistaken for "not being here to build an encyclopedia".

Focusing on niche topic areas: A user may have an interest in an obscure topic that other users find trivial, or may post contents that are difficult to comprehend. Diversity in interests and inputs from specialists in many fields help us function as a comprehensive encyclopedia. Even if you have never heard of a certain obscure school of 16th-century philosophy or a little-known physics theorem, it merits a Misplaced Pages article if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources – even if those sources are printed books and specialist academic journals.
Focusing on particular processes: A user may have an interest in creating stubs, tagging articles for cleanup, improving article compliance with the Manual of Style, or nominating articles for deletion. These are essential activities that improve the encyclopedia in indirect ways. Many "behind the scenes" processes and activities are essential to allow tens of thousands of users to edit collectively. Not every editor needs to perform "on stage", by creating articles and drafting new guidelines.
Advocating amendments to policies or guidelines: The community encompasses a very wide range of views. A user may believe a communal norm is too narrow or poorly approaches an issue, and take actions internally consistent with that viewpoint, such as advocating particular positions in discussions. Provided the user does so in an honest attempt to improve the encyclopedia, in a constructive manner, and assuming the user's actions are not themselves disruptive, such conversations form the genesis for improvement to Misplaced Pages.
Shortcut WP:NOTHERENORMS Difficulty, in good faith, with conduct norms: A number of users wish to edit, but find it overly hard to adapt to conduct norms such as collaborative editing, avoiding personal attacks, or even some content policies such as not adding their own opinions in their edits. These would be dealt with through guidance, simplified suggestions on how to contribute or reediting the content to the style and standards of Misplaced Pages. In a small number of cases this may lead to a friendly block with warnings or even bans in some long term cases. Failure to adapt to a norm is not – by itself – evidence that a user is not trying to contribute productively. Some users might require assistance, so don't be inconsiderate.
Expressing unpopular opinions in a non-disruptive manner: Merely advocating and implementing changes to Misplaced Pages articles or policies with reliable sources is allowed; even if these changes made are incompatible with certain Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, it is not the same as not being here to build an encyclopedia. The disagreeing editor should take care to not violate Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines such as getting the point and civility in the course of challenging unpopular opinions.

Review behavior as a whole

Main pages: Vandalism on Misplaced Pages, Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers, and Misplaced Pages:Postulate absence of malice

In an attempt to regulate edits that can have a surface appearance of vandalism, some editors may give in to tendentious editing. In this case, an editor should not engage in criticism of Misplaced Pages and should follow policies. They should not give in to impulsive instincts like guessing and engaging unpleasantly. A newcomer or a constructive user may at times make the occasional error, and they may need considerable time to acclimatize their conduct to the community's ways and norms. It is even possible for a well-rounded user to make mistakes. To err is human and it is an acceptable practice to admit when you are wrong and unappreciated to make it about winning for personal stat scores/ trophy collecting. In addition, a number of disruptive users may at times post nonconstructive edits only at intervals in order to avoid being blocked. Be bold in these cases, revert these edits, provide edit summary and for complex cases request administrator attention. Alternatively, if you are confident and have good dispute resolution and collaborative skills, attempt to solve minor conflicts at the article’s talk page. Be tolerant with the outcome, there is no deadline and the project is always a work in progress.

Being "here to build an encyclopedia" is about a user's overall purpose and behavior in editing Misplaced Pages. In considering whether or not a user is here to build an encyclopedia, the user's overall pattern of editing and contributing behavior, as well as the clarity of past warnings (dismissing vacuous warnings) or guidance and their attempts at improvement, should be reviewed as a whole.

Philosophy	Article content Articles must be written All Five Pillars are equally important Avoid vague introductions Be a reliable source Civil POV pushing Cohesion Competence is required Concede lost arguments Dissent is not disloyalty Don't lie Don't search for objections Editing Misplaced Pages is like visiting a foreign country Editors will sometimes be wrong Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia Explanationism External criticism of Misplaced Pages Here to build an encyclopedia Leave it to the experienced Levels of competence Levels of consensus Most ideas are bad Need Neutrality of sources Not broken is ugly Not editing because of Misplaced Pages restriction The one question Oversimplification Paradoxes Paraphrasing POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields Process is important Product, process, policy Purpose Reasonability rule Systemic bias There is no seniority Ten Simple Rules for Editing Misplaced Pages Tendentious editing The role of policies in collaborative anarchy The rules are principles Trifecta We are absolutely here to right great wrongs Misplaced Pages in brief Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia Misplaced Pages is a community Misplaced Pages is not RationalWiki
Article construction	100K featured articles Abandoned stubs Acronym overkill Adding images improves the encyclopedia Advanced text formatting Akin's Laws of Article Writing Alternatives to the "Expand" template Amnesia test A navbox on every page An unfinished house is a real problem Articles have a half-life Autosizing images Avoid mission statements Be neutral in form Beef up that first revision Blind men and an elephant BOLD, revert, discuss cycle Build content to endure Cherrypicking Chesterton's fence Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books Citation overkill Citation underkill Common-style fallacy Concept cloud Creating controversial content Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability Deprecated sources Dictionaries as sources Don't demolish the house while it's still being built Don't get hung up on minor details Don't hope the house will build itself Don't panic Don't "teach the controversy" Editing on mobile devices Editors are not mindreaders Encourage the newcomers Endorsements (commercial) Featured articles may have problems Formatting bilateral relations articles Formatting bilateral relations templates Fruit of the poisonous tree Give an article a chance How to write a featured article Identifying and using independent sources History sources Law sources Primary sources Science sources Style guides Tertiary sources Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats Inaccuracy Introduction to structurism Mine a source Merge Test Minors and persons judged incompetent "Murder of" articles Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography Not everything needs a navbox Not everything needs a template Nothing is in stone Obtain peer review comments Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area Permastub Potential, not just current state Presentism Principle of Some Astonishment The problem with elegant variation Pro and con lists Printability Pruning article revisions Publicists Put a little effort into it Restoring part of a reverted edit Robotic editing Sham consensus Source your plot summaries Specialized-style fallacy Stub Makers Run an edit-a-thon Temporary versions of articles Tertiary-source fallacy There are no shortcuts to neutrality There is no deadline There is a deadline The deadline is now Try not to leave it a stub What is a reliable source Understanding Misplaced Pages's content standards Walled garden What an article should not include Misplaced Pages is a work in progress Misplaced Pages is not a reliable source Misplaced Pages is not being written in an organized fashion The world will not end tomorrow Write the article first Writing better articles
Writing article content	Avoid thread mode Copyediting reception sections Coup Don't throw more litter onto the pile Gender-neutral language Myth vs fiction Proseline Use our own words We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions Write the article first Writing about women Writing better articles
Removing or deleting content	Adjectives in your recommendations AfD is not a war zone Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions Arguments to make in deletion discussions Avoid repeated arguments Before commenting in a deletion discussion But there must be sources! Confusing arguments mean nothing Content removal Counting and sorting are not original research Delete or merge Delete the junk Deletion is not cleanup Does deletion help? Don't attack the nominator Don't confuse stub status with non-notability Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument Emptying categories out of proccess Follow the leader How the presumption of notability works How to save an article proposed for deletion I just don't like it Identifying blatant advertising Identifying test edits Immunity Keep it concise Liar liar pants on fire Nothing Nothing is clear Overzealous deletion Relisting can be abusive Relist bias The Heymann Standard Unopposed AFD discussion Misplaced Pages is not Whack-A-Mole Why was the page I created deleted? What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork No Encyclopedic Use

Essays on civility

The basics	Accepting other users Apology Contributing to complicated discussions Divisiveness Don't retaliate Editors' pronouns Edit at your own pace Encouraging the newcomers Enjoy yourself Expect no thanks High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors How to be civil Maintaining a friendly space Negotiation Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors Please say please Relationships with academic editors Thank you Too long; didn't read Truce Unblock perspectives We are all Wikipedians here You have a right to remain silent
Philosophy	A thank you never hurts A weak personal attack is still wrong Advice for hotheads An uncivil environment is a poor environment Be the glue Beware of the tigers! Civility warnings Deletion as revenge Failure Forgive and forget It's not the end of the world Nobody cares Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals Old-fashioned Wikipedian values Profanity, civility, and discussions Revert notification opt-out Shadowless Fists of Death! Staying cool when the editing gets hot The grey zone The last word There is no Divine Right of Editors Most ideas are bad Nothing is clear Reader The rules of polite discourse There is no common sense Two wrongs don't make a right Misplaced Pages clichés Misplaced Pages is not about winning Misplaced Pages should not be a monopoly Writing for the opponent
Dos	Assume good faith Assume the assumption of good faith Assume no clue Avoid personal remarks Avoid the word "vandal" Be excellent to one another Be pragmatic Beyond civility Call a spade a spade Candor Deny recognition Desist Discussing cruft Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass Encourage full discussions Get over it How to lose Imagine others complexly Just drop it Keep it concise Keep it down to earth Mind your own business Say "MOBY" Mutual withdrawal Read before commenting Settle the process first
Don'ts	ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI Misplaced Pages:Because I can Civil POV pushing Cyberbullying Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack Don't be a fanatic Don't be a jerk Don't be an ostrich Don't be ashamed Don't be a WikiBigot Don't be high-maintenance Don't be inconsiderate Don't be obnoxious Don't be prejudiced Don't be rude Don't be the Fun Police Don't bludgeon the process Don't call a spade a spade Don't call people by their real name Don't call the kettle black Don't call things cruft Don't come down like a ton of bricks Don't cry COI Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify Don't eat the troll's food Don't fight fire with fire Don't give a fuck Don't help too much Don't ignore community consensus Don't knit beside the guillotine Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature Don't remind others of past misdeeds Don't shout Don't spite your face Don't take the bait Don't template the regulars Don't throw your toys out of the pram Do not insult the vandals Griefing Hate is disruptive Nationalist editing No angry mastodons just madmen No Nazis No racists No Confederates No queerphobia No, you can't have a pony Passive aggression POV railroad Superhatting There are no oracles There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns You can't squeeze blood from a turnip UPPERCASE
WikiRelations	WikiBullying WikiCrime WikiHarassment WikiHate WikiLawyering WikiLove WikiPeace

Essays on notability

Humorous essays

About essays

About essays	Essay guide Value of essays Difference between policies, guidelines and essays Don't cite essays as if they were policy Avoid writing redundant essays Finding an essay Quote your own essay
Policies and guidelines	About policies and guidelines Policies Guidelines How to contribute to Misplaced Pages guidance Policy writing is hard

Categories:

Latest revision as of 08:45, 24 December 2024

Being here to build an encyclopedia

Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia

What "not here to build an encyclopedia" is not

Review behavior as a whole

Other content

See also