Misplaced Pages

Human rights in Singapore: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:54, 11 July 2014 edit202.156.150.124 (talk) Undid revision 616523845 by Zhanzhao (talk)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:37, 1 October 2024 edit undoCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,453,928 edits Altered template type. Add: work, date, newspaper, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Articles needing more viewpoints from September 2024 | #UCB_Category 8/15 
(374 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}} <!-- "none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see ] -->
{{Politics of Singapore}}
{{Use Singapore English|date=July 2023}}
Human Rights in Singapore are abysmal. The government in Singapore has broad powers to limit citizens' rights and to inhibit political opposition.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2009/eap/136008.htm | title=2009 Human Rights Report: Singapore | publisher=U.S. Department of State | date=March 11, 2010 | accessdate=March 15, 2014}}</ref> In 2014, Singapore was ranked 150th out of 175 nations by ] in the ]. ] ranked Singapore 4 out of 7 for political freedom, and 4 out of 7 for civil liberties (where 1 is the most free), with an overall ranking of "partly free".
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2017}}
{{Politics of Singapore}}{{Unbalanced|date=September 2024}}
Since ]'s independence in 1965, the '''human rights of Singaporeans''' have been set out in the ] and include rights found in subsequent amendments and referendums. These rights have evolved through Singapore's history as a part of the ], its years under ], its position as a separate ], and its present day status as a sovereign ] and ].


], specifically Article 14(1), guarantees and protects ]' rights to ], ], and ]. As a ], Singaporeans are also guaranteed democratic rights to change their government through free and fair elections.
== Internal Security Act==

{{main|Internal Security Act (Singapore)}}
== Conscription ==
The Ministry of Home Affairs ] enforces the country's ] (ISA) as a counter to potential ], international ], threats to racial and religious harmony, and subversion. The ISA permits ] without formal charges or recourse to trial, and has been used to imprison political opponents, including ], who was held for 32 years without trial before being released. As of 2005, 36 men were being held under the ISA.<ref name="amnesty2005">{{cite web | url=http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/sgp-summary-eng | title=Amnesty International Report 2005: Singapore | publisher=Amnesty International | year=2005 | accessdate=March 15, 2014}}</ref>

===Enlistment Act (1970)===
{{main|Conscription in Singapore}}

Similar to countries such as ], ] and ], all male Singapore citizens and second-generation ] (PR) who have reached the age of 18 are required (unless medically exempt) to undergo a two-year conscription known as National Service. Those who have gone AWOL (]) can be fined or sentenced to jail if there are no valid reasons for doing so.<ref>{{cite news |date=12 February 2016 |title=NS evader jailed 1½ months; judge gives sentencing guidelines |url= http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/ns-evader-jailed-112-months-judge-gives-sentencing-guidelines |newspaper=The Straits Times |location=Singapore}}</ref>

Male citizens who hold dual citizenships may renounce their Singapore citizenship only upon completion of their service,<ref>{{cite news |date=2 March 2016 |title=Singapore-born New Zealand teenager has to fulfil national service obligations: MFA |url= http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/singapore-born-new-zealand-teenager-has-to-fulfil-national-service-obligations-mfa |newspaper=The Straits Times |location= Singapore}}</ref> unless they have citizenship of another country at age 11, and have announced to the Ministry of Defence of their intention to renounce their citizenships before the age of 11, and avoid all "socio-economic benefits of a Singapore citizenship" before their renunciation of Singaporean citizenship after attaining the ].<ref>{{cite news |date=25 January 2016 |title=How to avoid serving NS if you hold dual citizenship |url= http://www.theindependent.sg/how-to-avoid-serving-ns-if-you-hold-dual-citizenship/ |newspaper=The Independent |location= Singapore}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Guide to NS Issues |publisher= Singapore Expats |url=http://www.singaporeexpats.com/resources-in-singapore/articles/guide-to-ns.htm |website=www.singaporeexpats.com}}</ref> Second-generation permanent residents who renounce their PR status without serving NS will be ] if they apply to return to Singapore to study or work in the future.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Must Permanent Residents (PRs) do National Service? |url= http://www.gov.sg/factually/content/must-permanent-residents-do-national-service |website=www.gov.sg}}</ref>

==Judicial punishments==

=== Corporal punishment ===
{{main|Caning in Singapore}}
{{See also|Michael P. Fay}}

Singapore employs ] in the form of ] for numerous criminal offences if committed by males under 50. This is a mandatory sentence for some offences such as ] and ]. Caning is never ordered on its own in Singapore, only in combination with imprisonment.

Caning can be enforced of at least three strokes, combined with a minimum of three months' imprisonment, for foreign workers and illegal immigrants who overstay by more than 3 months. The government argues that this is necessary to deter would-be immigration offenders, as Singapore remains an attractive destination for illegal immigrants. It feels that imprisonment alone is not a sufficient deterrent, and that long-term overstayers who are not able to work will pose social problems and may turn to crime.<ref>{{cite web |date=26 May 2008 |title=Written Answer to Parliament Question on Mandatory Caning of Foreign Workers Who Overstay |url=http://www.mha.gov.sg/news_details.aspx?nid=MTIzMQ%3D%3D-yqlR8v6x2x4%3D |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140220170006/http://www.mha.gov.sg/news_details.aspx?nid=MTIzMQ%3D%3D-yqlR8v6x2x4%3D |archive-date=20 February 2014 |access-date=15 March 2014 |publisher=Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs |df=dmy-all}}</ref>


Corporal punishment may also be ordered for various sexual offences, rioting, the possession of weapons, violence of all kinds, illicit drug use, and vandalism of public property. Male members of the armed forces are liable to a less severe form of caning for breaches of military discipline.{{citation needed|date=December 2020}}
== Human rights under domestic law ==


=== Capital punishment ===
===Right to life, capital punishment===
{{main|Capital punishment in Singapore}} {{main|Capital punishment in Singapore}}
Singapore enforces the death penalty by ]. It is mandatory for premeditated and aggravated murder and for the possession or trafficking of more than {{convert|14|g}} of ] in its pure form (diamorphine).<ref>{{cite web |date=5 September 2013 |title=Singapore: Country Specific Information |url=https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/english/country/singapore.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150105144915/http://travel.state.gov/content/passports/english/country/singapore.html |archive-date=5 January 2015 |access-date=15 March 2014 |publisher=Department of State}}</ref> According to ], some 400 criminals were hanged between 1991 and 2003, mostly for drug offenses and murder.<ref>{{cite web |date=n.d. |title=Singapore: The death penalty: A hidden toll of executions |url=http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id=14C1E722FEE4F90E80256DFE0068898C&lang=e |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110503225911/http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id=14C1E722FEE4F90E80256DFE0068898C&lang=e |archive-date=3 May 2011 |access-date=15 March 2014 |publisher=Amnesty International USA |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref name="amnesty2005" />
Singapore enforces the ] by hanging and has, according to ], one of the world's highest execution rates relative to its population.<ref name="amnesty2005"/> The government has contested Amnesty's claims, and denies that its use of the death penalty constitutes a violation of human rights. Singapore is against ], and ] is not legalized.


The government argues that death penalty is meted out for the most serious crimes to curb the drug menace as Singapore is particularly vulnerable due to its small size and location near the ].<ref>{{cite press release |title=The Singapore Government's Response To Amnesty International's Report "Singapore – The Death Penalty: A Hidden Toll Of Executions" |date=30 January 2004 |publisher=Ministry of Home Affairs, Singapore |url=http://www.mha.gov.sg/basic_content.aspx?pageid=74 |access-date=22 April 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100125195351/http://www.mha.gov.sg/basic_content.aspx?pageid=74 |archive-date=25 January 2010}}.</ref>
In Singapore the death penalty is mandatory for ] and for the possession of more than 15g of heroin in its pure form (dia-morphine), which is deemed to be evidence of trafficking.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://travel.state.gov/content/passports/english/country/singapore.html | title=Singapore: Country Specific Information | publisher=Department of State | date=September 5, 2013 | accessdate=March 15, 2014}}</ref> Amnesty International, which opposes all capital punishment on principle, notes that some 400 criminals were hanged between 1991 and 2003, for a population of 5 million.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id=14C1E722FEE4F90E80256DFE0068898C&lang=e | title=Singapore: The death penalty: A hidden toll of executions | publisher=Amnesty International USA | date=Undated | accessdate=March 15, 2014}}</ref>
== Detention without trial ==


===Internal Security Act===
The government states that drug-trafficking is one of the most serious crimes, because Singapore is particularly vulnerable to the drug menace due to its small size and location near the ]. The government also states that Singapore does not mete out the death penalty lightly and uses it only in the most serious cases. The government claims that, as a result of its strict policies, Singapore has among the lowest prevalence of drug abuse across a range of hard and soft drugs.<ref>{{cite press release |title=The Singapore Government's Response To Amnesty International's Report "Singapore – The Death Penalty: A Hidden Toll Of Executions" |publisher=Ministry of Home Affairs, Singapore |url=http://www.mha.gov.sg/basic_content.aspx?pageid=74 |date=January 30, 2004 |accessdate=22 April 2010}}.</ref>
{{main|Internal Security Act (Singapore)}}


The Ministry of Home Affairs ] enforces the country's ], which has the stated intent of countering potential espionage, international terrorism, threats to racial and religious harmony, and subversion.
=== Freedom of expression and association ===
The government has restricted ] and ] and has limited other ] and political rights. ] of sexual, political and racially or religiously sensitive content is extensive.


The ISA permits ] without formal charges or recourse to trial, and has historically been used to imprison political opponents of the ] during ] and ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Plea to free political detainee Chia Thye Poh |url= http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19850714-1.2.20.14 |newspaper=The Straits Times |location= Singapore |date=14 July 1985}}</ref> In the 2000s during the height of ], 36 men were being held under the ISA, including members of the militant group ].<ref name="amnesty2005">{{cite web|url=http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/sgp-summary-eng |title=Amnesty International Report 2005: Singapore |publisher=Amnesty International |year=2005 |access-date=15 March 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080604195731/http://www.web.amnesty.org/report2005/sgp-summary-eng |archive-date=4 June 2008 }}</ref>
In Singapore, under the Public Order Act 2009, outdoor public processions or assemblies require police permits. Without police permits, such outdoor assemblies are illegal.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://in.reuters.com/article/2009/01/17/idINIndia-37501620090117 |title=Singapore to toughen protest laws ahead of APEC meet |agency=Reuters |date=17 January 2009}}</ref> Indoor assemblies, however, can be held freely without the need to apply for police permits.<ref>{{cite press release |url= http://www.ifex.org/singapore/2011/10/17/see_harassed/ |title=Activist filmmaker under investigation for organising event |publisher=International Freedom of Expression Exchange |date=17 October 2011}}</ref> The only place in Singapore where outdoor public assemblies do not require police permits is at the ] which is modelled on ]. However, one must still register one's personal details with the National Parks Board online before speaking or protesting at the Speakers' corner, and there are also many CCTVs in the park, a situation that had some Singaporeans and Singaporean MPs complaining.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/371502/1/.html |title= Singaporeans can demonstrate at Speakers' Corner from Sep 1 |work=Channel News Asia |location =Singapore |date=25 August 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/444612/1/.html |title=CCTV installed at Speakers' Corner |work=Channel News Asia |location =Singapore |date=25 July 2008}}</ref>


===Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act===
Government pressure to conform has resulted in the practice of ] by journalists.<ref name="LOCprof">{{cite web | url=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/profiles/Singapore.pdf | title=the Singapore profile, the Library of Congress Country Studies project (PDF) | publisher=the Library of Congress | date=May 2005 | accessdate=March 15, 2014}}</ref> According to ], in 2010 laws were tightened to limit the freedom of expression and assembly, and used to threaten critics and opposition activists. Lawsuits were taken out by the authorities against dissidents. Government critics and human rights defenders nevertheless held public gatherings.<ref name="Amnesty2010">{{cite web | url=http://report2010.amnesty.org/sites/default/files/AIR2010_AZ_EN.pdf#page=233 | title=Amnesty International Report 2010 (PDF) | publisher=Amnesty International | accessdate=March 15, 2014 | pages=233}}</ref>
] without trial under the ] has been used to deal with espionage, terrorism, ], and ].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Sim |first=Walter |date=14 November 2013 |title=Detention without trial extended for 5 more years |url=http://www.asiaone.com/singapore/detention-without-trial-extended-5-more-years |access-date=22 August 2017 |work=AsiaOne |location=Singapore}}</ref>


== Freedom of expression ==
A British journalist, ], was convicted in ] in 2010 of ] for ], through his published views on the country's criminal justice system, sentenced to six weeks' imprisonment and a fine of $20,000.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://static.amnesty.org/air11/amnesty_international_report_2011_en.pdf | title=Amnesty International Report 2011 (PDF) | publisher=Amnesty International | accessdate=March 15, 2014 | pages=287–288}}</ref>
Although the right to freedom of speech and association is guaranteed by ], the ] government has been accused of restricting ] and limiting other ] and political rights, especially during the 20th century.<ref>{{cite news |date=9 March 2017 |title=The government of Singapore says it welcomes criticism, but its critics still suffer |url=https://www.economist.com/news/asia/21718571-three-protesters-get-stiff-penalties-disturbing-public-order-government-singapore-says-it |newspaper=The Economist |location=London}}</ref>


The only place in Singapore where outdoor public assemblies do not require police permits for citizens is at the ], similar to ]. However, foreigners still require a permit to speak at the park, and one must still register personal details with the National Parks Board before speaking or protesting at the Speakers' corner. There are also many ] in the park, a situation that some Singaporeans and Singaporean MPs have commented on.<ref>{{cite news |date=25 August 2008 |title=Singaporeans can demonstrate at Speakers' Corner from Sep 1 |url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/371502/1/.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080907035711/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/371502/1/.html |archive-date=7 September 2008 |access-date=30 July 2012 |work=Channel News Asia |location=Singapore}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=25 July 2008 |title=CCTV installed at Speakers' Corner |url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/444612/1/.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170817122042/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/444612/1/.html |archive-date=17 August 2017 |access-date=30 July 2012 |work=Channel News Asia |location=Singapore}}</ref>
=== National Service ===
{{main|Conscription in Singapore}}
All male Singaporean citizens and second-generation permanent residents who have reached the age of 18 are to enroll for national service. They serve a 22- or 24-month period as Full Time National Servicemen (NSFs), either in the ] (SAF), ] (SPF), or the ] (SCDF).


According to Amnesty International, laws that had limited freedom of expression and assembly, and to stifle critics and activists, had been somewhat relaxed in 2010, with government critics and human rights defenders being able to hold public gatherings without much interference. Nonetheless, lawsuits were taken out by the authorities against dissidents. <ref name="Amnesty2010">{{cite web |title=Amnesty International Report 2010 |url=http://report2010.amnesty.org/sites/default/files/AIR2010_AZ_EN.pdf#page=233 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20140329014910/http://report2010.amnesty.org/sites/default/files/AIR2010_AZ_EN.pdf#page=233 |archive-date=29 March 2014 |access-date=15 March 2014 |publisher=Amnesty International |pages=233}}</ref>
== Social Issues ==


] of content deemed by the state to be political and racially or religiously-sensitive occurs, and is imposed formally through stringent media regulations and informally through ]s placed upon local journalists as well as the provision and withdrawal of public arts funding.<ref>{{Cite web |date=12 August 2016 |title=Singapore contempt of court bill seen suppressing freedom of speech |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-singapore-rights-idUSKCN10N0NA |via=www.reuters.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Harmon |first1=Steph |date=9 September 2017 |title=Art v government at Singapore festival: 'I fear once I leave, they will punish me' |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/09/art-v-government-at-singapore-festival-i-fear-once-i-leave-they-will-punish-me |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=George |first1=Cherian |title=Contentious journalism and the Internet |date=2006 |publisher=Singapore University Press |isbn=9789971693251 |pages=43–47}}</ref> Government pressure to conform has resulted in the practice of ] by journalists.<ref name="LOCprof">{{cite web |date=May 2005 |title=the Singapore profile, the Library of Congress Country Studies project |url=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/profiles/Singapore.pdf |access-date=15 March 2014 |publisher=Library of Congress |location=Washington DC}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=5 September 2017 |title=Singapore profile |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-15966553 |website=BBC News}}</ref>
=== Homosexuality ===
{{main|LGBT rights in Singapore}}
Singapore law dating from 1938 (]) bans sexual relations between men, but no prosecutions for private sexual activity have taken place since 1999. Since May 2009 rally at Speaker's Corner, gay rights supporters have participated in the annual Pink Dot SG rally at the Speakers’ Corner, ] without government interference.<ref name=HRW2010>HRW 2010 pages 343-346</ref> The 2009 event was deemed significant enough to be included in the U.S. Department of State's human rights reports for 2009, released on 11 March 2010.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.globalequality.org/storage/cfge/documents/2009%20hr%20report%20sogi%20references.pdf | title=Human Rights Reports for 2009 (PDF)| publisher=Department of State | date=March 11, 2010 | accessdate=March 15, 2014}}</ref>


=== Migrant workers === ===Sedition Act===
{{main|Sedition Act (Singapore)}}
According to ] one quarter of Singapore's population were migrants at the end of 2009.


The Sedition Act prohibits seditious acts and speech; and the printing, publication, sale, distribution, reproduction and importation of seditious publications.{{citation needed|date=December 2020}}
The Employment of Foreign Workers Act excludes domestic workers (2009). Singapore does not provide basic protection for foreign domestic workers, such as a standard number of working hours and rest days, minimum wage and access to employment benefits.<ref name="AI2009U">{{cite web | url=http://thereport.amnesty.org/sites/report2009.amnesty.org/files/documents/air09-en.pdf | title=Amnesty International Report 2009, the State of the World's Human Rights (PDF)| publisher=Amnesty International | accessdate=March 15, 2014 | pages=289–290}}</ref> The recruitment fees of domestic workers can be up to 40% of the workers salary in a two-year contract.
Until end of 2010 Singapore government have refused to regulate the recruitment fees.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/wr2011.pdf | title=World Report 2011 (PDF) | publisher=Human Rights Watch | accessdate=March 15, 2014 | pages=368}}</ref>


In addition to punishing actions that tend to undermine the administration of government, the Act also criminalizes actions which promote feelings of ill-will or hostility between different races or classes of the population.{{clarification needed|date=February 2021}}
In 2010 two migrants from ], after 11 years' work in Singapore, did not receive new work permits, following their active support for ].<ref name="Amnesty2010">{{cite web | url=http://report2010.amnesty.org/sites/default/files/AIR2010_AZ_EN.pdf#page=233 | title=Amnesty International Report 2010 | publisher=Amnesty International | accessdate=March 15, 2014 | pages=233}}</ref>


=== Human trafficking === ===Public Order Act (2009)===
Under the Public Order Act 2009, a police permit is required to hold large public processions or outdoor assemblies legally.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2009/01/17/idINIndia-37501620090117 |title=Singapore to toughen protest laws ahead of APEC meet |work=Reuters |date=17 January 2009 |access-date=30 July 2012 |archive-date=4 November 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151104222414/http://in.reuters.com/article/2009/01/17/idINIndia-37501620090117 |url-status=dead }}</ref> However, indoor assemblies could be held freely without the need to apply for police permits.<ref>{{cite press release |url= http://www.ifex.org/singapore/2011/10/17/see_harassed/ |title=Activist filmmaker under investigation for organising event |publisher=International Freedom of Expression Exchange |date=17 October 2011}}</ref>
The US Trafficking in Persons 2009 report listed Singapore on Tier 2: countries not doing enough to address ]. Women are trafficked to Singapore for domestic work and ].<ref name="HRW2010">{{cite web | title=Human Rights Watch Report 2010 | publisher=Human Rights Watch |pages=343–346}}</ref>


As of October 2017, all event organisers are required to notify the police if they expect more than 5,000 attendees for public events or 10,000 at any one time for private assemblies.<ref>{{cite news|title=New rules for event organisers to kick in Oct 1|publisher=Channel NewsAsia|date=27 September 2017}}</ref> The Commissioner of Police may refuse a permit for public assembly or procession if it is deemed to be directed towards a political or religious end, or is organised by or involving non-Singapore entities and citizens, due to the risk of ].<ref>{{cite news|title=Singapore to block foreigners from promoting political causes locally|url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-to-block-foreigners-from-promoting-political-causes-lo-8712130|publisher=Channel NewsAsia|access-date=13 October 2017|archive-date=12 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112014248/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-to-block-foreigners-from-promoting-political-causes-lo-8712130|url-status=dead}}</ref>
==Legislation==


Police permits are not granted to events that are deemed to have a "significant risk of public disorder" and those that could "incite feelings of hostility between different racial and religious groups" in Singapore. Authorities have justified refusing permits on the grounds that racial riots have previously occurred in the country, most notably the ] and ].<ref>{{cite news |date=13 February 2015 |title=Police reject activist Gilbert Goh's application for Speakers' Corner permit |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/police-reject-activist-gilbert-gohs-application-for-speakers-corner-permit |newspaper=The Straits Times |location=Singapore}}</ref>
===Corporal punishment===
{{main|Caning in Singapore}}
Singapore also employs ] in the form of severe ] for numerous criminal offences if committed by males under 50, and this is a mandatory sentence for some 30 offences. Some international observers, including Amnesty International, maintain that corporal punishment is in itself contrary to human rights, but this is disputed. Caning is never ordered on its own in Singapore, only in combination with imprisonment. There is mandatory caning of at least three strokes, combined with a minimum of three months' imprisonment, for foreign workers who overstay by more than 3 months. The government argues that this is necessary to deter would-be immigration offenders, as Singapore remains an attractive destination for illegal immigrants; experience prior to 1989 had shown that imprisonment was not alone a sufficient deterrent. It feels that long-term overstayers who are not able to work legitimately pose social problems and may turn to crime.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.mha.gov.sg/news_details.aspx?nid=MTIzMQ%3D%3D-yqlR8v6x2x4%3D | title=Written Answer to Parliament Question on Mandatory Caning of Foreign Workers Who Overstay | publisher=Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs | date=May 26, 2008 | accessdate=March 15, 2014}}</ref>


===Contempt of court===
Corporal punishment may also be ordered for various sexual offences, rioting, the possession of weapons, violence of all kinds, illicit drug use, and vandalism of public property. Male members of the armed forces are liable to a less severe form of caning for breaches of military discipline.
{{main|Offence of scandalizing the court in Singapore}}


The offence of scandalizing the court is committed when a person brings a court or a judge into contempt, or to lower authority. Allegations of bias, lack of impartiality, impropriety or any wrongdoing concerning a judge in the exercise of his judicial function falls within the offence.{{citation needed|date=February 2024}}
] without trial has been used to deal with ], terrorism, ], and ].


===Newspaper and Printing Presses Act (1974)===
== International agreements ==
The Act requires the chief editor or the proprietor of a newspaper to obtain a permit from the relevant Minister in order to print or publish a newspaper in Singapore.{{citation needed|date=February 2024}} Section 10 of the Act gives the Minister the power to appoint the management shareholders of all newspaper companies and to control any transfers of such management shares.<ref name="act">{{Cite web |title=Newspaper and Printing Presses Act - Singapore Statutes Online |url=https://sso.agc.gov.sg:5443/Act-Rev/NPPA1974/Published/20021231?DocDate=19910301 |access-date=2023-06-14 |website=sso.agc.gov.sg |language=en}}</ref> It also gives the management shareholders a minimum 66% majority in any votes regarding staffing decisions.
According to ], Singapore has signed the following international agreements relating to human rights:<ref name="AI2009A">{{cite web | url=http://thereport.amnesty.org/sites/report2009.amnesty.org/files/documents/air09-en.pdf | title=Amnesty International Report 2009, The State of the World's Human Rights (PDF) | accessdate=March 15, 2014 | pages=380–381}}</ref>


== Minority rights ==
* ] (CEDAW)
* ] (CRC)
* Optional Protocol to the CRC on the involvement of children in armed conflict in 2008
As of 2010, Singapore has not signed the following agreements:<ref name="AI2011">{{cite web | url=http://files.amnesty.org/air11/air_2011_full_en.pdf | title=Amnesty International 2011 Full Report, the State of the World's Human Rights (PDF) | publisher=Amnesty International | accessdate=March 15, 2014}}</ref>


=== LGBT rights ===
* ] (ICCPR)
{{main|LGBT rights in Singapore}}
* Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, aiming at the abolition of the ]
* International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
* ]
* Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
* Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951)
* ] (1967)
* Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (1954)
* ] (1961)
* ]


Singaporean law dating from 1938 until 2023 (]) banned sexual relations between men, but no prosecutions for private sexual activity have taken place since 1999. Since a May 2009 rally at Speaker's Corner at ], gay-rights supporters have participated in the annual Pink Dot SG rally at Speaker's Corner, without government interference.<ref name=HRW2010>HRW 2010 pages 343–346</ref> The 2009 event was deemed significant enough to be included in the US Department of State's human rights reports for 2009.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2009/eap/136008.htm |title=Human Rights Reports for 2009: Singapore |publisher=US Department of State |date=11 March 2010 |accessdate=5 January 2019}}</ref> On 21 August 2022, Prime Minister ] announced during the annual ] that the government intended to repeal Section 377A, effectively ending criminalisation both ''de facto'' and ''de jure''.<ref name=":2">{{Cite news |title=NDR 2022: Govt to repeal Section 377A, amend Constitution to protect marriage definition from legal challenges |url= https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/ndr-2022-section-377a-repeal-constitution-1974206 |date=21 August 2022 |work=Today |first=Justin |last=Ong |location= Singapore}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite news |title=NDR 2022: Govt will repeal Section 377A, decriminalise sex between men |work=The Straits Times |location= Singapore |url= https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/ndr-2022-govt-will-repeal-section-377a-decriminalise-sex-between-men |author=Tham Yuen-C |date=22 August 2022 }}</ref> On 29 November 2022, the ] passed a bill to repeal Section 377A.<ref name="StraitsRepealed">{{Cite news |last=Goh |first=Yan Han |date=29 November 2022 |title=Parliament repeals Section 377A, endorses amendments protecting definition of marriage |work=The Straits Times |location=Singapore |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/parliament-repeals-section-377a-endorses-amendments-protecting-marriage-definition |access-date=3 December 2022}}</ref> The bill was assented by President ] on 27 December 2022 and gazetted on 3 January 2023, thus Section 377A was struck off the books.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Goh |first=Yan Han |date=2023-01-03 |title=S377A officially repealed after President Halimah gives assent to Bill {{!}} The Straits Times |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/s377a-officially-repealed-as-president-assents-to-changes-to-legislation |access-date=2023-01-03 |website=www.straitstimes.com |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{cite web |date=3 January 2023 |title=Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2022 |url=https://sso.agc.gov.sg//Acts-Supp/39-2022/Published/20230103?DocDate=20230103 |access-date=8 January 2023 |website=Singapore Statutes Online}}</ref>
==International rankings==
{{Main|International rankings of Singapore}}


=== Immigrant workers' rights ===
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" width="100%" style="font-size:95%; margin:0px 0px"
Singapore provides basic protection for foreign domestic workers, such as a standard number of working hours and rest days. Foreign workers can also report their employers to the ] in the case of mistreatment, and employers have been fined or even jailed when found guilty of such acts.<ref name="AI2009U">{{cite web|url=http://thereport.amnesty.org/sites/report2009.amnesty.org/files/documents/air09-en.pdf |title=Amnesty International Report 2009, the State of the World's Human Rights |publisher=Amnesty International |access-date=15 March 2014 |pages=289–290 |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090805013030/http://thereport.amnesty.org/sites/report2009.amnesty.org/files/documents/air09-en.pdf |archive-date=5 August 2009 }}</ref>
! colspan="7" | {{pad}}International rankings of ]</sub></tr>


Previously, the recruitment fees of domestic workers can be up to 40% of the workers salary in a two-year contract. In 2020, the Singapore government announced that a law will be legislated that will pass the cost of placement fee to employers, as a way for the country to reduce its reliance on domestic workers.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/consumer/employers-to-pay-up-to-3k-more-for-new-maids-from-indonesia|title=Employers to pay up to $3k more for new maids |last=Devaraj |first=Samuel |date=18 December 2020 |website=straitstimes.com |publisher=] |access-date=27 December 2020 |quote="A Ministry of Manpower (MOM) spokesman told The New Paper it has received feedback from employment agencies here that the Indonesian authorities are enforcing a "zero placement fee policy" from Jan 1 next year. The ruling means employers must now pay this fee to enable new Indonesian FDWs to come to Singapore debt-free."}}</ref>
!colspan=3 | '''Political Rankings'''
|-
! Organization
! Survey
! Ranking
|-
| ]
| ]
| Partly Free
|-
|]
| ]
| Not Free
|-
|]
|]
|133rd out of 175
|-
|]
|]
|82nd out of 167 (Hybrid regime)
|-
|]
|]
|5th out of 182
|-
|] and ]
|]
|"Endemic surveillance society" status
|-
!colspan=3 | '''Economic Rankings'''
|-
! Organization
! Survey
! Ranking
|-
|]
|]
|23rd out of 180
|-
|-
|]
|]
|5th out of 181
|-
|]
|]
|9th out of 156
|-
|]
|]
|Gini Coefficient of 42.5 (High income inequality country)
|-
|]
|]
|1st out of 183
|-
|]
|]
|1st out of 118
|-
|-
|]
|]
|3rd out of 133
|-
!colspan=3 | Social Rankings
|-
|]
|]
|23rd in the world ("Developed country" status)
|-
|]
|]
|11th out of 111
|-
|]
|]
|3rd out of 239
|-|-
|]
|]
|11th out of 111
|-|-
|]
|]
|7th out of 192 (42.6% of Singapore's population are foreigners)
|-
|]
|]
|23rd out of 210
|-
|]
|]
|62nd out of 166
|-
|]
|]
|221st out of 223
|}


==See also== ==Privacy==
When the Singapore constitution was written, it did not include a ] and the subsequent ] does not protect citizens from government-sanctioned surveillance.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Right to Privacy in Singapore |url=https://www.privacyinternational.org/sites/default/files/Singapore_UPR_PI_submission_FINAL.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702183328/https://www.privacyinternational.org/sites/default/files/Singapore_UPR_PI_submission_FINAL.pdf |archive-date=2 July 2015 |website=Privacy International}}</ref> The government does not need prior judicial authorisation to conduct any surveillance interception, and documents that restrict what officials can do with personal data are classified.<ref>{{Cite news |date=3 August 2015 |title=Singapore is using spyware, and its citizens can't complain |url=https://www.digitalnewsasia.com/digital-economy/singapore-is-using-spyware-and-its-citizens-cant-complain |access-date=22 August 2017 |work=Digital News Asia |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Meyers |first1=Jessica |date=28 August 2017 |title=Singapore has an idea to transform city life — but there may be a privacy cost |url=https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-singapore-smart-nation-2017-story.html |newspaper=Los Angeles Times}}</ref> In a U.S State Department report in 2015, it is believed that law enforcement and government agencies have extensive networks for gathering information and conducting surveillance. A majority of Singaporeans are widely aware that authorities track telephone conversations and the use of the internet of civilians, and indirect routine checks are done on some government critics.<ref>{{Cite web |year=2016 |title=Singapore 2015 Human Rights Report |url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/253009.pdf |publisher=US State Department |page=8}}</ref>
{{Portal|Human rights|Singapore}}


The Singapore ] was listed as a customer of spyware maker ] in a data leak. The group is alleged to have used spyware to analyse the digital footprint of its intended audience.<ref>{{Cite news |date=6 August 2015 |title=Singaporean and Malaysian Governments Accused of Using Spyware for Digital Surveillance of Citizens |url=https://www.ifsecglobal.com/the-singapore-and-malaysia-government-connection-with-hacking-team-exposed-both-countries-using-spyware-for-digital-surveillance/ |access-date=22 August 2017 |work=IFSEC Global {{!}} Security and Fire News and Resources}}</ref>{{better source needed|date=December 2020}}
*]

*]
The ] claims that the threshold for surveillance is higher in Singapore and that the majority of citizens have accepted the "surveillance situation" as necessary for deterring terrorism and "self-radicalisation." Singaporeans are said to have accepted the ] between residents and their government, and expect to "surrender certain civil liberties and individual freedoms in exchange for fundamental guarantees: security, education, wealth, safety, affordable housing, and health care."<ref>{{Cite news |date=29 July 2014 |title=The Social Laboratory |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/07/29/the-social-laboratory/ |access-date=22 August 2017 |work=Foreign Policy |location=Washington DC}}</ref> With the push for the ] initiative to collate and analyse big data from all aspects of urban life for decision-making, it is unclear how individual rights to privacy will continue to be upheld.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Seeking Privacy in a City of Sensors |url=https://www.citylab.com/life/2017/04/singapore-city-of-sensors/523392/ |access-date=22 August 2017 |work=CityLab}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Tech in Asia - Connecting Asia's startup ecosystem |url=https://www.techinasia.com/singapore-advanced-surveillance-state-citizens-mind |access-date=22 August 2017 |website=www.techinasia.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Watts |first1=Jake Maxwell |last2=Purnell |first2=Newley |date=25 April 2016 |title=Singapore Is Taking the 'Smart City' to a Whole New Level |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/singapore-is-taking-the-smart-city-to-a-whole-new-level-1461550026 |access-date=22 August 2017 |work=The Wall Street Journal |location=New York}}</ref>
*]

*]
In November 2017, it was announced that the government would introduce legislation in 2018 to mandate all private doctors to submit patient information for the centralised national healthcare database named National Electronic Health Records System (NEHR).<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lai |first1=Linette |date=8 November 2017 |title=All healthcare practices roped into plan to put patients' medical history in electronic database |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/all-practices-roped-into-plan-to-put-residents-medical-history-in-electronic |work=The Straits Times |location=Singapore}}</ref> Patients can request for their health records to be made inaccessible to physicians and healthcare workers, but the records will still be added and updated to the electronic system. While the authorities have asserted that only relevant healthcare workers will have access to the patients' data,<ref>{{cite news |date=8 November 2017 |title=National electronic patient database soon to be mandatory for healthcare providers |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/national-electronic-health-record-mandatory-clinics-9385666 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190711124631/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/national-electronic-health-record-mandatory-clinics-9385666 |archive-date=11 July 2019 |access-date=22 December 2017 |work=Channel NewsAsia |location=Singapore}}</ref> it was noted that there have been cases of illegal access of patients' records from outside Singapore even with the privacy safeguards in place.<ref>{{cite news |date=8 November 2017 |title=Doctors seek assurances on patient privacy and IT security |url=http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/doctors-seek-assurances-patient-privacy-and-it-security |work=Today |location=Singapore}}</ref>
*]

*]
== Human trafficking ==
{{main|Human trafficking in Singapore}}
As of 2020, the U.S–based ] listed Singapore on Tier 1, which states that the Singapore government has fully complied with the TVPA's minimum standards, making it a non-issue.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/inaccuracies-in-annual-us-trafficking-report-singapore | title=Inaccuracies in annual US trafficking in persons report: Singapore | newspaper=The Straits Times | date=24 July 2019 | access-date=16 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2020-TIP-Report-Complete-062420-FINAL.pdf | title=TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS REPORT 20TH EDITION | access-date=16 July 2020 | pages=441}}</ref>

==International agreements==
According to ], Singapore has signed the following international agreements relating to human rights:<ref name="AI2009A">{{cite web|url=http://thereport.amnesty.org/sites/report2009.amnesty.org/files/documents/air09-en.pdf |title=Amnesty International Report 2009, The State of the World's Human Rights |access-date=15 March 2014 |pages=380–381 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090805013030/http://thereport.amnesty.org/sites/report2009.amnesty.org/files/documents/air09-en.pdf |archive-date=5 August 2009 }}</ref>

* ] (CEDAW)
* ] (CRC)
* Optional Protocol to the CRC on the involvement of children in armed conflict in 2008
* ]
* International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)


==References== ==References==
Line 198: Line 115:
|by=no |by=no
}} }}
*{{loc}} {{Reflist|30em}}
{{reflist|2}}


{{portalbar|Singapore}}
{{Singapore topics}} {{Singapore topics}}
{{Law of Singapore}}
{{Asia in topic|Human rights in}} {{Asia in topic|Human rights in}}



Latest revision as of 06:37, 1 October 2024

This article is part of a series on
Politics of Singapore
Constitution
Legislature


Executive
Judiciary

Elections
flag Singapore portal
This article may be unbalanced toward certain viewpoints. Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page. (September 2024)

Since Singapore's independence in 1965, the human rights of Singaporeans have been set out in the Constitution of Singapore and include rights found in subsequent amendments and referendums. These rights have evolved through Singapore's history as a part of the Straits Settlements, its years under Japanese occupation, its position as a separate self-governing crown colony, and its present day status as a sovereign island country and city-state.

Article 14 of the Constitution of Singapore, specifically Article 14(1), guarantees and protects Singaporeans' rights to freedom of speech and expression, peaceful assembly without arms, and association. As a parliamentary democracy, Singaporeans are also guaranteed democratic rights to change their government through free and fair elections.

Conscription

Enlistment Act (1970)

Main article: Conscription in Singapore

Similar to countries such as South Korea, Switzerland and Taiwan, all male Singapore citizens and second-generation permanent residents (PR) who have reached the age of 18 are required (unless medically exempt) to undergo a two-year conscription known as National Service. Those who have gone AWOL (Desertion) can be fined or sentenced to jail if there are no valid reasons for doing so.

Male citizens who hold dual citizenships may renounce their Singapore citizenship only upon completion of their service, unless they have citizenship of another country at age 11, and have announced to the Ministry of Defence of their intention to renounce their citizenships before the age of 11, and avoid all "socio-economic benefits of a Singapore citizenship" before their renunciation of Singaporean citizenship after attaining the age of majority. Second-generation permanent residents who renounce their PR status without serving NS will be blacklisted if they apply to return to Singapore to study or work in the future.

Judicial punishments

Corporal punishment

Main article: Caning in Singapore See also: Michael P. Fay

Singapore employs corporal punishment in the form of caning for numerous criminal offences if committed by males under 50. This is a mandatory sentence for some offences such as rape and vandalism. Caning is never ordered on its own in Singapore, only in combination with imprisonment.

Caning can be enforced of at least three strokes, combined with a minimum of three months' imprisonment, for foreign workers and illegal immigrants who overstay by more than 3 months. The government argues that this is necessary to deter would-be immigration offenders, as Singapore remains an attractive destination for illegal immigrants. It feels that imprisonment alone is not a sufficient deterrent, and that long-term overstayers who are not able to work will pose social problems and may turn to crime.

Corporal punishment may also be ordered for various sexual offences, rioting, the possession of weapons, violence of all kinds, illicit drug use, and vandalism of public property. Male members of the armed forces are liable to a less severe form of caning for breaches of military discipline.

Capital punishment

Main article: Capital punishment in Singapore

Singapore enforces the death penalty by hanging. It is mandatory for premeditated and aggravated murder and for the possession or trafficking of more than 14 grams (0.49 oz) of heroin in its pure form (diamorphine). According to Amnesty International, some 400 criminals were hanged between 1991 and 2003, mostly for drug offenses and murder.

The government argues that death penalty is meted out for the most serious crimes to curb the drug menace as Singapore is particularly vulnerable due to its small size and location near the Golden Triangle.

Detention without trial

Internal Security Act

Main article: Internal Security Act (Singapore)

The Ministry of Home Affairs Internal Security Department enforces the country's Internal Security Act, which has the stated intent of countering potential espionage, international terrorism, threats to racial and religious harmony, and subversion.

The ISA permits indefinite detention without formal charges or recourse to trial, and has historically been used to imprison political opponents of the People's Action Party during Operation Coldstore and Operation Spectrum. In the 2000s during the height of Islamic terrorism, 36 men were being held under the ISA, including members of the militant group Jemaah Islamiyah.

Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act

Internment without trial under the Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act has been used to deal with espionage, terrorism, organised crime, and narcotics.

Freedom of expression

Although the right to freedom of speech and association is guaranteed by Article 14(1) of the Constitution of Singapore, the People's Action Party government has been accused of restricting freedom of speech and limiting other civil and political rights, especially during the 20th century.

The only place in Singapore where outdoor public assemblies do not require police permits for citizens is at the Speakers' Corner, similar to Hyde Park, London. However, foreigners still require a permit to speak at the park, and one must still register personal details with the National Parks Board before speaking or protesting at the Speakers' corner. There are also many surveillance cameras in the park, a situation that some Singaporeans and Singaporean MPs have commented on.

According to Amnesty International, laws that had limited freedom of expression and assembly, and to stifle critics and activists, had been somewhat relaxed in 2010, with government critics and human rights defenders being able to hold public gatherings without much interference. Nonetheless, lawsuits were taken out by the authorities against dissidents.

Censorship of content deemed by the state to be political and racially or religiously-sensitive occurs, and is imposed formally through stringent media regulations and informally through OB markers placed upon local journalists as well as the provision and withdrawal of public arts funding. Government pressure to conform has resulted in the practice of self-censorship by journalists.

Sedition Act

Main article: Sedition Act (Singapore)

The Sedition Act prohibits seditious acts and speech; and the printing, publication, sale, distribution, reproduction and importation of seditious publications.

In addition to punishing actions that tend to undermine the administration of government, the Act also criminalizes actions which promote feelings of ill-will or hostility between different races or classes of the population.

Public Order Act (2009)

Under the Public Order Act 2009, a police permit is required to hold large public processions or outdoor assemblies legally. However, indoor assemblies could be held freely without the need to apply for police permits.

As of October 2017, all event organisers are required to notify the police if they expect more than 5,000 attendees for public events or 10,000 at any one time for private assemblies. The Commissioner of Police may refuse a permit for public assembly or procession if it is deemed to be directed towards a political or religious end, or is organised by or involving non-Singapore entities and citizens, due to the risk of foreign interference.

Police permits are not granted to events that are deemed to have a "significant risk of public disorder" and those that could "incite feelings of hostility between different racial and religious groups" in Singapore. Authorities have justified refusing permits on the grounds that racial riots have previously occurred in the country, most notably the 1964 and 1969 race riots.

Contempt of court

Main article: Offence of scandalizing the court in Singapore

The offence of scandalizing the court is committed when a person brings a court or a judge into contempt, or to lower authority. Allegations of bias, lack of impartiality, impropriety or any wrongdoing concerning a judge in the exercise of his judicial function falls within the offence.

Newspaper and Printing Presses Act (1974)

The Act requires the chief editor or the proprietor of a newspaper to obtain a permit from the relevant Minister in order to print or publish a newspaper in Singapore. Section 10 of the Act gives the Minister the power to appoint the management shareholders of all newspaper companies and to control any transfers of such management shares. It also gives the management shareholders a minimum 66% majority in any votes regarding staffing decisions.

Minority rights

LGBT rights

Main article: LGBT rights in Singapore

Singaporean law dating from 1938 until 2023 (Penal Code, s. 377A) banned sexual relations between men, but no prosecutions for private sexual activity have taken place since 1999. Since a May 2009 rally at Speaker's Corner at Hong Lim Park, gay-rights supporters have participated in the annual Pink Dot SG rally at Speaker's Corner, without government interference. The 2009 event was deemed significant enough to be included in the US Department of State's human rights reports for 2009. On 21 August 2022, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced during the annual National Day Rally that the government intended to repeal Section 377A, effectively ending criminalisation both de facto and de jure. On 29 November 2022, the Parliament of Singapore passed a bill to repeal Section 377A. The bill was assented by President Halimah Yacob on 27 December 2022 and gazetted on 3 January 2023, thus Section 377A was struck off the books.

Immigrant workers' rights

Singapore provides basic protection for foreign domestic workers, such as a standard number of working hours and rest days. Foreign workers can also report their employers to the Ministry of Manpower in the case of mistreatment, and employers have been fined or even jailed when found guilty of such acts.

Previously, the recruitment fees of domestic workers can be up to 40% of the workers salary in a two-year contract. In 2020, the Singapore government announced that a law will be legislated that will pass the cost of placement fee to employers, as a way for the country to reduce its reliance on domestic workers.

Privacy

When the Singapore constitution was written, it did not include a right to privacy and the subsequent data protection act does not protect citizens from government-sanctioned surveillance. The government does not need prior judicial authorisation to conduct any surveillance interception, and documents that restrict what officials can do with personal data are classified. In a U.S State Department report in 2015, it is believed that law enforcement and government agencies have extensive networks for gathering information and conducting surveillance. A majority of Singaporeans are widely aware that authorities track telephone conversations and the use of the internet of civilians, and indirect routine checks are done on some government critics.

The Singapore Info-communications Media Development Authority was listed as a customer of spyware maker Hacking Team in a data leak. The group is alleged to have used spyware to analyse the digital footprint of its intended audience.

The Ministry of Defence claims that the threshold for surveillance is higher in Singapore and that the majority of citizens have accepted the "surveillance situation" as necessary for deterring terrorism and "self-radicalisation." Singaporeans are said to have accepted the social contract between residents and their government, and expect to "surrender certain civil liberties and individual freedoms in exchange for fundamental guarantees: security, education, wealth, safety, affordable housing, and health care." With the push for the Smart Nation initiative to collate and analyse big data from all aspects of urban life for decision-making, it is unclear how individual rights to privacy will continue to be upheld.

In November 2017, it was announced that the government would introduce legislation in 2018 to mandate all private doctors to submit patient information for the centralised national healthcare database named National Electronic Health Records System (NEHR). Patients can request for their health records to be made inaccessible to physicians and healthcare workers, but the records will still be added and updated to the electronic system. While the authorities have asserted that only relevant healthcare workers will have access to the patients' data, it was noted that there have been cases of illegal access of patients' records from outside Singapore even with the privacy safeguards in place.

Human trafficking

Main article: Human trafficking in Singapore

As of 2020, the U.S–based Trafficking in Persons report listed Singapore on Tier 1, which states that the Singapore government has fully complied with the TVPA's minimum standards, making it a non-issue.

International agreements

According to Amnesty International, Singapore has signed the following international agreements relating to human rights:

References

Library resources about
Human rights in Singapore
  1. "NS evader jailed 1½ months; judge gives sentencing guidelines". The Straits Times. Singapore. 12 February 2016.
  2. "Singapore-born New Zealand teenager has to fulfil national service obligations: MFA". The Straits Times. Singapore. 2 March 2016.
  3. "How to avoid serving NS if you hold dual citizenship". The Independent. Singapore. 25 January 2016.
  4. "Guide to NS Issues". www.singaporeexpats.com. Singapore Expats.
  5. "Must Permanent Residents (PRs) do National Service?". www.gov.sg.
  6. "Written Answer to Parliament Question on Mandatory Caning of Foreign Workers Who Overstay". Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs. 26 May 2008. Archived from the original on 20 February 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  7. "Singapore: Country Specific Information". Department of State. 5 September 2013. Archived from the original on 5 January 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  8. "Singapore: The death penalty: A hidden toll of executions". Amnesty International USA. n.d. Archived from the original on 3 May 2011. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  9. ^ "Amnesty International Report 2005: Singapore". Amnesty International. 2005. Archived from the original on 4 June 2008. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  10. "The Singapore Government's Response To Amnesty International's Report "Singapore – The Death Penalty: A Hidden Toll Of Executions"" (Press release). Ministry of Home Affairs, Singapore. 30 January 2004. Archived from the original on 25 January 2010. Retrieved 22 April 2010..
  11. "Plea to free political detainee Chia Thye Poh". The Straits Times. Singapore. 14 July 1985.
  12. Sim, Walter (14 November 2013). "Detention without trial extended for 5 more years". AsiaOne. Singapore. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  13. "The government of Singapore says it welcomes criticism, but its critics still suffer". The Economist. London. 9 March 2017.
  14. "Singaporeans can demonstrate at Speakers' Corner from Sep 1". Channel News Asia. Singapore. 25 August 2008. Archived from the original on 7 September 2008. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
  15. "CCTV installed at Speakers' Corner". Channel News Asia. Singapore. 25 July 2008. Archived from the original on 17 August 2017. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
  16. "Amnesty International Report 2010" (PDF). Amnesty International. p. 233. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  17. "Singapore contempt of court bill seen suppressing freedom of speech". 12 August 2016 – via www.reuters.com.
  18. Harmon, Steph (9 September 2017). "Art v government at Singapore festival: 'I fear once I leave, they will punish me'". The Guardian. London.
  19. George, Cherian (2006). Contentious journalism and the Internet. Singapore University Press. pp. 43–47. ISBN 9789971693251.
  20. "the Singapore profile, the Library of Congress Country Studies project" (PDF). Washington DC: Library of Congress. May 2005. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  21. "Singapore profile". BBC News. 5 September 2017.
  22. "Singapore to toughen protest laws ahead of APEC meet". Reuters. 17 January 2009. Archived from the original on 4 November 2015. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
  23. "Activist filmmaker under investigation for organising event" (Press release). International Freedom of Expression Exchange. 17 October 2011.
  24. "New rules for event organisers to kick in Oct 1". Channel NewsAsia. 27 September 2017.
  25. "Singapore to block foreigners from promoting political causes locally". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 13 October 2017.
  26. "Police reject activist Gilbert Goh's application for Speakers' Corner permit". The Straits Times. Singapore. 13 February 2015.
  27. "Newspaper and Printing Presses Act - Singapore Statutes Online". sso.agc.gov.sg. Retrieved 14 June 2023.
  28. HRW 2010 pages 343–346
  29. "Human Rights Reports for 2009: Singapore". US Department of State. 11 March 2010. Retrieved 5 January 2019.
  30. Ong, Justin (21 August 2022). "NDR 2022: Govt to repeal Section 377A, amend Constitution to protect marriage definition from legal challenges". Today. Singapore.
  31. Tham Yuen-C (22 August 2022). "NDR 2022: Govt will repeal Section 377A, decriminalise sex between men". The Straits Times. Singapore.
  32. Goh, Yan Han (29 November 2022). "Parliament repeals Section 377A, endorses amendments protecting definition of marriage". The Straits Times. Singapore. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
  33. Goh, Yan Han (3 January 2023). "S377A officially repealed after President Halimah gives assent to Bill | The Straits Times". www.straitstimes.com. Retrieved 3 January 2023.
  34. "Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2022". Singapore Statutes Online. 3 January 2023. Retrieved 8 January 2023.
  35. "Amnesty International Report 2009, the State of the World's Human Rights" (PDF). Amnesty International. pp. 289–290. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 August 2009. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  36. Devaraj, Samuel (18 December 2020). "Employers to pay up to $3k more for new maids". straitstimes.com. The Straits Times. Retrieved 27 December 2020. A Ministry of Manpower (MOM) spokesman told The New Paper it has received feedback from employment agencies here that the Indonesian authorities are enforcing a "zero placement fee policy" from Jan 1 next year. The ruling means employers must now pay this fee to enable new Indonesian FDWs to come to Singapore debt-free.
  37. "The Right to Privacy in Singapore" (PDF). Privacy International. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2015.
  38. "Singapore is using spyware, and its citizens can't complain". Digital News Asia. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  39. Meyers, Jessica (28 August 2017). "Singapore has an idea to transform city life — but there may be a privacy cost". Los Angeles Times.
  40. "Singapore 2015 Human Rights Report" (PDF). US State Department. 2016. p. 8.
  41. "Singaporean and Malaysian Governments Accused of Using Spyware for Digital Surveillance of Citizens". IFSEC Global | Security and Fire News and Resources. 6 August 2015. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  42. "The Social Laboratory". Foreign Policy. Washington DC. 29 July 2014. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  43. "Seeking Privacy in a City of Sensors". CityLab. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  44. "Tech in Asia - Connecting Asia's startup ecosystem". www.techinasia.com. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  45. Watts, Jake Maxwell; Purnell, Newley (25 April 2016). "Singapore Is Taking the 'Smart City' to a Whole New Level". The Wall Street Journal. New York. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  46. Lai, Linette (8 November 2017). "All healthcare practices roped into plan to put patients' medical history in electronic database". The Straits Times. Singapore.
  47. "National electronic patient database soon to be mandatory for healthcare providers". Channel NewsAsia. Singapore. 8 November 2017. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 22 December 2017.
  48. "Doctors seek assurances on patient privacy and IT security". Today. Singapore. 8 November 2017.
  49. "Inaccuracies in annual US trafficking in persons report: Singapore". The Straits Times. 24 July 2019. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
  50. "TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS REPORT 20TH EDITION" (PDF). p. 441. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
  51. "Amnesty International Report 2009, The State of the World's Human Rights" (PDF). pp. 380–381. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 August 2009. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
Portal:
Singapore articles
History
Geography
Politics
Economy
Society
Culture
Symbols
Law of Singapore
Constitutional law
Executive branch
Legislative branch
Judicial branch
Constitution
The dome of a building with a green patina, against a blue sky with clouds in it.
Administrative law
General
Illegality
Irrationality
Procedural impropriety
Alternative dispute
resolution
Criminal law
Family law
Religious law
Other
Procedure
Human rights in Asia
Sovereign states
States with
limited recognition
Dependencies and
other territories
Category:
Human rights in Singapore: Difference between revisions Add topic