| Revision as of 07:21, 1 November 2013 editWilyD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users32,255 edits Lfdder← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:16, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,141,441 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (755 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{bots|deny=SineBot}} | |||
| == Speedy deletion declined: ] == | |||
| {{Page mover topicon}} | |||
| Hello No such user, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of ] - a page you tagged - because: '''I'm not sure that this speedy really applies to languages. PROD or take to AfD, but i think it's pretty notable.''' Please review the ] before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. ]] 15:55, 27 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{retired}} | |||
| == Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C == | |||
| :Well, it's an article about a ] which doesn't even assert notability, does not cite any sources, and has about zero google hits, so it borders on ]. I do admit that, technically speaking, CSD A7 does not cover non-notable constructed languages (and non-notable baloons, non-notable pets, etc). OK, let's waste everyone's time at an AFD... ] (]) | |||
| <section begin="announcement-content" /> | |||
| == Municipalities of Serbia == | |||
| :''] '' | |||
| Dear Wikimedian, | |||
| Hi and thanks for showing interest in this topic. First of all, the municipalities that recently gained city status are no longer municipalities, but are now cities (there are currently 24 cities). The cities may and may not be divided into "city municipalities" which are another, less important type of the municipality, subordinated to the city. The new Law on territorial organisation, adopted in 2007 says that the basic units of local self-government are ''municipalities and cities''. They are different, but are on the same level. Municipalities and cities are organised into ''districts''. The only exception is the ] which does not belong to any district, but is district on it's own. | |||
| *I think it is a good idea to put both cities and municipalities into one article, since they are the same level of self-government. I think You should propose a merger and movong the page to "]". | |||
| *You also proposed that the ] should than be moved to "]", but I worn You that there are already articles ] and ], and if we make ], there would be a huge overlapping between those. I don't know what would be the best thing to do. Please, give me Your opinion. ] (]) 23:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process. | |||
| == Giuseppe... == | |||
| This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. | |||
| Apologies for the "undo". I see now he was known under that name before. | |||
| Anyways much respect, and no hf. ;) ] | |||
| The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ]. | |||
| ==Novi Sad, names== | |||
| Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well. | |||
| Please stop removing Romanian names from the Novi Sad article. Romanian is one of the official languages in ] and therefore it should be a Romanian language name present in the capital of the province. By the way, your logic of a small presence of Romanians in Novi Sad is irrelevant. PS: And Rysins are more present than Romanians? ] (]) 12:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" /> | |||
| Ok. Fair and square :). Greetings ] (]) 13:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list_2&oldid=26721207 --> | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| ==VANU== | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} | |||
| --] (]) 07:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| Hello, i would like you to ask for some help, if you would like to help of course. From previous experience i know that you are a good wikipedian. I am having some kind of an edit war with one user on the VANU(Vojvodjanska akademija nauka i umetnosti) article, i don`t know, maybe it is my fault and he is right, but if it is not to big of an trouble can you check it. The user i am having trouble edits an article without any reference and adds a lot of political speculations. By my opinion we should not mix culture with politics or SANU(Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti) would be full of political speculations and controversy too. Thank you in advance. ] (]) 11:20, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| :I see you're doing fine so far. I'm busy in RL these days, but I'll add the article to my watchlist. ] (]) 10:28, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| Please can you take a look now after the merge? I am still having some problems and i would like if you could resolve it as a neutral side that knows what is the article about. The main problem is if Novi Sad is the capital or the administrative center. Can you please clarify this. Thank you. ] (]) 19:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| thanks for your watchfulness . I should have noticed. In fact, I'm pretty sure I had removed that whole chart earlier myself. He must have slipped through reinserting it at some point. ] ] 11:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| :You're welcome. The guy is really a pest... who knows how many bad climate charts lurk around, I wonder. ] (]) 11:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| == Not overdoing, being consistent == | |||
| ] | |||
| Nope, the office was not abolished in 2003, merely merged to allow it to be held by one and the same person. See the full title of the office of Svetozar Marović. Let me finish... :) --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">] <sup>(])</sup></font> 11:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, there it is. (I'm at the hospital so I regretably won't be able to respond to any posts until tommorow at about this same hour, if even then. Forces beyond my control. I am "technically" still on some sort of "WikiBreak") --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">] <sup>(])</sup></font> 12:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::xD The irony is I'm aiming for a specialization in psychiatry... --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">] <sup>(])</sup></font> 12:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::LoL, now you're getting the picture... --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">] <sup>(])</sup></font> 12:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| == ПOCЛA == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| Greetings, ], and thank you for confirming ] on the ] yesterday. That's along the lines of what I'd surmised. My need for clarification centered on the idiomatic usage of the singular "business" vs. the plural, "businesses" being too literal for this context. A related ] idiom would be "monkey business." The connection with the actual commercial activites named in the upper part of the cartoon remains implicit at the visual level. I appreciate your input! ''-- ] (]) 10:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)'' | |||
| Hello, | |||
| :You're welcome. ] (]) 11:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| == Direktor evaded Blocking== | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| He reported that blocking Direktor has evaded for 48 hrs. reversing some pages for the Republic of Dubrovnik and Dubrovnik, this is the link of Direktor IP 83.131.220.241. --] (]) 13:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Relating article ] == | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| I am really sorry to bother you, but since I cited you at a discussion with ] and at a , I think it would be polite on me to give you notice on this. I hope you remember the discussion that was taking place about direktors edits on that and other related articles. This was your citation I had used to defend myself: . I am saying to "defend myself" because I have been quite attacked in many different ways because of my insistance in debating the issue, and in wanting the ] to accept mediation about it (all other users involved had already accepted). Direktor continues with his unflexibility, and I had been constantly active in persuing some sort of consensus. Since direktor is boycoting the mediation request, and also using other "dirty" ways to boycot the discussion, like manipulation or purposly missunderstanding already 5 or more times explained issues, and some other users on his behalve are using other tricks as "falsifiying" mediators I am obligated to try to find some help. I am not asking to block or punish in any way nobody (I don´t have reasons for it), but I really have to ask you to try to bring them to reason and make them stop constantly attacking me with unpolitness and rudeness, and perhaps try to convince direktor to accept mediation (if you agree with it, of course), since that seems to be the only possible way in disposition to solve civily this case. Apologising to you for disturbing you on this,and hoping a solution and an end on this issue is archived, I send you regards. Filip. ] (]) 17:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744489 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| == Third opinion request == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| Hello | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Since I currently have a harsh dispute with another editor expedient reply will be highly appreciated by me. I wanted to know whether you find edit as spamming or spam linking. Please take into account that it was reinstating the previously existing link. Thank you in advance. All the best, --]] 20:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :That URL links to ] of previous version of our article... whose history, I believe, is currently located at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Origin_of_the_Serbs&action=history. Since we want external links to tell the reader something more extensive and/or reliable than our current article, it's pointless to link to contents which were deleted from Misplaced Pages for one reason or another. Indeed, ]#12 states that "Mirrors or forks of Misplaced Pages should not be linked.". | |||
| </div> | |||
| :I'm lazy to search now, but I suppose that external links in dab pages are, at least, discouraged. Ah, here it is: ]: "Never include external links, either as entries or in descriptions." But I'd say that the fact that it's a WP mirror is the key factor for removing it. ] (]) 06:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| == Mediation == | |||
| I'm not sure if you're watching the talk page for ] so I thought I'd drop a note here. The mediation is proceeding, please see ]. --<span style="text-shadow:#DDDDDD 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 21:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Changing maps== | |||
| Nice meeting you. Not everyone knows how to edit maps. How do we edit maps? ] (]) 09:35, 7 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == The Truth(video game player) == | |||
| I recently wrote an article on "The Truth". He is a local tournament goer i have had the privilage to meet and see him play several times. i decided to write an article on his history and i recognize he doesn't have published winnings. Gamestop only has records of the "National Tournament" they held and only the top finalists at that. He is well known in the Phoenix area amongst many gamers and also in the online venue. There are however, no newspaper articles or internet sites that track these wins or records. So i saw it fitting to document them myself here. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello. I'm not sure if it is smart to continue this discussion this way by posting message to user talk pages. The discussion became segmented and will be hard to follow, and there should a central place for this. I hope others won't mind if I bring it to the talk page of the article itself. --Best regards, ]] 09:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hey NSU, it’s easy to miss, but I thought you might enjoy, that Baseball Bugs was arguing a similar defense to yours. BB was playing with people’s credulity by making specious arguments that egged people on, while staying close enough to the line so as not to be completely obvious about it. He was one of my fiercest, and funniest, defenders. Thanks for taking the time to share your comments. Cheers, ] (]) 16:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah it was too subtle for my feeble mind to comprehend. Still, I liked my McCarthy analogy :) | |||
| :So, the two of you '''were''' actually conspiring to establish a Communist regime on Misplaced Pages, oust the ], and send millions of cats to squishing machines?! I think I'll change my vote, then. ] (]) 09:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] Filing == | |||
| I've provided my opinion and put the sanctions notice on the talk page and about what I see there. It's easy to get frustrated in these cases but you should always seek the higher ground. In particular your notice to him was a bit rude, the "When you're awake" and "I've reported you" weren't really necessary. Try to keep ]. --] (]) 14:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, point taken. ] (]) 15:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == New article suggestion == | |||
| Hello No such user. | |||
| I noticed a while back your comment on this ] debate, and I was quite interested in your idea about having a summarized section for a small and or former political party (of Serbia) in one aritcle (example: List of politcal parties of Serbia). I'm sure you've noticed there are alot of Serbian politcal party articles no more than one or two sentences long, and while they may be worth mentioning, I think you would agree they still don't exactly justify having their own separate aritcles with such a miniscule amount of information available. So to get to the point, I propose we create a new article to sort of bulk them all together in... for instance: ''List of small and former political parties in Serbia''. Let me know what you think. Best regards. ] (]) 03:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, the problem with "List of small and former political parties in Serbia" is that it is hard to unambiguously define "small" :). | |||
| :Still, we do have ], which is fairly short by now. I suggest the following: | |||
| :#Expand the #Non-parliamentary parties section of that article, with a table similar to the list of parliamentary parties. | |||
| :#Create a ], split into two sections (1820-1945 and 1989-today) | |||
| :#Merge/redirect the sub-stubs into appropriate line (HTML anchor) of the list article. | |||
| :Now, one thing is not clear to me: according to , the limit for party registration renewal (2009-2010) was fairly high 10,000 voter signatures. If I recall correctly, only ~50 parties passed that threshold in 2010 (that would be the ones for our main article); according to , the correct figure is reasonable 72. However, lists 446 active organizations? Where does that discrepancy come from? ] (]) 15:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks! == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #cedff2; width:100%;" | |||
| |rowspan="3" valign="top" style="width:5em"| ] | |||
| |rowspan="3" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''{{fontcolor|blue|The ]n Barnstar of National Merit}}''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid gray; height:7em;"| For your wast and priceless contributions regarding ]. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 18:13, 23 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: bottom; border-top: 2px solid gray;" |<sub>''This WikiAward was given to No such user by <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> on 18:13, 23 September 2010 (UTC)''</sub> | |||
| |} | |||
| == Article == | |||
| There is not a single reason, except the fact I contributed to it a few times (by deleting that "color book" junk etc) for which an article about me, human rights activist who's work was followed by BBC, ARD and other largest TV stations in the World may be deleted. There is also an article on Swedish Misplaced Pages and Youth Rights Wiki. --] (]) 07:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Looking for Greben mountain == | |||
| I was going to write to you about ]. You have probably understood from BG wiki that it's mostly located in Serbia, with a very small southwestern section in Bulgaria. I ''think'' it has to be the same mountain, but what bother me a little is that it is described as being directly northwest of the Zavalska planina, which BG wiki says lies on the tripoint of Bulgaria, Serbia and the Republic of Macedonia. If your coordinates for are correct, that's a little far and not quite north''west''. Might be just an inaccurate description or my lack of ability to identify the mountain on Google Maps based on the coordinates :) <span style="text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;"> — ] ] —</span> 14:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Ah, didn't know about Terrain View, quite useful. Yeah, that definitely reaches Vrabcha, and the height of 1337 or 1338 m of the highest peak is reflected in the Bulgarian wiki as well as in the ]. So that has to be it. <span style="text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;"> — ] ] —</span> 14:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ] | |||
| This is an automated message from ]. I have performed a web search with the contents of ], and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://wmda.mobi/en/Category:Zenica-Doboj_Canton_geography_stubs. | |||
| It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. | |||
| If substantial content is duplicated and it is not ] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our ] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see ] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincluded--> ] (]) 08:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Serbian war crimes split == | |||
| They could be flamewar-magnets, yes, but the articles seem referenced and the generic nature of both the adjective "Serbian" and the generic nature of the apparent crimes defy a simple rejection. They have to go through the AfD process; or get merged into a more generic article with a less inflammatory title. For the Balkan Wars, there's some other duplication (see Talk) and potential for ]; for the Yugoslav wars, there's ] - do you agree with a merge? The controversial part of the latter would be assigning a direct link between the country of Serbia and all of those assorted war crimes committed by ethnic Serb units. But that link has already been discussed in reliable sources, so I'd merge it. --] (]) 08:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Please let's move this to | |||
| :* ] | |||
| :* ] | |||
| : TIA --] (]) 08:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Croatian language article == | |||
| I saw your participation in the Croatian language article and thought that you would be interested in this: --<font face="xx-medium serif"> ]</font></font> <sub>(])</sub></font> 12:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes thanks, I saw that already. I'm not inclined to comment though, since I don't have anything new to add. I don't think that any admin is willing to try to resolve these issues however; Balkan problems tend to be either swept under the rug, or handled with ]. ] (]) 13:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Trebati == | |||
| You seem to have misread the definition given in | |||
| ''Trebati'' is equally used as a transitive verb and as a logical subject in dative in the Croatian language. If it really were only used in the spoken language, it would say ''razg.'' in front of the definition. Unless you come up with a better source which says otherwise, the information given in the article is incorrect. | |||
| I don't see the point in differentiating the Croatian and Serbian language when it comes to this particular verb. There are oh so many differences, yes, but this isn't one of them. | |||
| As for ''treba da'', it also says it's a literary lexeme in the Croatian language. That's important and unlisted, I reckon. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:17, 25 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :For everyone's convenience, replied at ]. ] (]) 10:20, 27 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Autopatrolled == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the ] permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting ]. Please remember: | |||
| *This permission does not give you any special status or authority | |||
| *Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal | |||
| *You may wish to display the {{tl|Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{tl|User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page | |||
| *If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it | |||
| :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!] | ] 03:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I thought I already had it automagically :). ] (]) 08:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Reviewer permission == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. Your account has been granted the "<tt>reviewer<tt>" userright, allowing you to ] on certain flagged pages. ], also known as flagged revisions, underwent a ] which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use. | |||
| Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not ] to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only ], similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at ]. | |||
| For the guideline on reviewing, see ]. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found ], and the general policy for the trial can be found ]. | |||
| If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.<!-- Template:Reviewer granted --> ] | ] 12:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Rollback == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember: | |||
| *Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including ] and ], some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution | |||
| *Rollback is only for blatant ] | |||
| *Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority | |||
| *Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator | |||
| *Please read ] and ] to get to know the workings of the feature | |||
| *You can test Rollback at ] | |||
| *You may wish to display the {{tl|User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{tl|Rollback}} top icon on your user page | |||
| :If you have any questions, please do let me know. | |||
| ] | ] 12:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == 84.61.155.24 == | |||
| Not sure what's up with that IP. Could you stop by the ref desk talk page and comment? Thank you! ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 15:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Stop reediting my posts == | |||
| In the article regarding Serbia I dont have to discuss anything,cause I've just added a few dates in the state establishment events and dates,which are correct. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| What is there to discuss about??Im not editing something thats disputed or controversial,Im just adding dates and events that are important for summing up Serbian history.Formation of the Serbian Empire and loss of independence are important and cannot be excluded. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:06, 11 March 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :You're not providing citations. You had best go find some. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 11:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's not about citations (the year is not contentious), it's about relevance. More precisely still, it is about ] and ]. ] (]) 11:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your fantastic work! Bravo! :) <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 12:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thanks. ] (]) 15:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Transliterator== | |||
| Thanks for the tip! I'll install the gadget on my computer's Firefox browser :) ] (]) 15:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == knife == | |||
| Thank you for your advice. I will do like you said. --] (]) 10:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == A cookie for you! == | |||
| {| cellspacing="8" cellpadding="0" style="border: 2px solid #8cbff9; background-color: #d9ecff;" | |||
| |style="padding: 0.5em; vertical-align: middle;"|{{#if:Choco_chip_cookie.png|]}} | |||
| |style="padding: 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0.1em; vertical-align: middle;"|<div style="font-size: 109%; margin-bottom: 1em;">] has given you a cookie! {{ucfirst:cookies}} promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. <span style="color:black"><sup>]</sup></span></div> | |||
| |} | |||
| :Yummie :) ] (]) 07:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == IP 95.180.18.56 == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I noticed that you have been reverting IP 95.180.18.56 ,but it is not lucid to me that whether you are in a dispute over content with the user, or what you do are reverting vandalism. If you are in a dispute over content, you need to discuss edits. But if not, you need to report the Ip user for vandalism and may ask edit protection for the moot articles, instead of reverting to and fro.--] (]) 10:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :You need to be careful if the admins do not always consider the edits of the Ip user to be vandalism. I suggest that you try to start a discussion with the IP user, tentatively, and if there is no response to your attempt, the IP user needs to be reported for edit-warring . Because if those edits would have been always vandalism, then in my opinion, your reports should have had some kind of effect on ]. | |||
| ::It is indeed a difficult situation, but if I were you , I would not not report the IP user for edit warring at once, because if those edits do not look obvious vandalism, you may also be blocked for edit warring. So try to discuss content changes first, and if your attempt is in vain, go to the edit-warring board to fill a report then. --] (]) 11:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::It seems to me that my advice has become obsolete.-] (]) 12:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Jagoda == | |||
| Bot Escarbot is removing sr:Јагода from interwiki links on ]. How can we solve this problem? --] (]) 12:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Torlak dialect == | |||
| Thanks for the amendment on ] dealing with the observation on mentioning Croats twice. I've edited your version slightly so that the sentences become one and readers are not confused as to why we mention Krashovani and the fact that they are Croat. Be that as it may, it has occurred to me why I presented it as such and that was because it is not only in Romania where there are Croats speaking Torlak but in Kosovo too (locally the ]). It elevates the Croatian importance but I don't know how best to present this; perhaps we should go back to my original and then introduce the ''multi-ethnic identifying'' Krashovans as a fifth people because of their geographical exclusion. I say multi-ethnic because a handful do identify as Serb or even as ''Krashovan'' itself. Any thoughts? ] ('''Евлекис''') 16:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :As far as I know, Janjevci do not speak Torlak: they are descendants of Dubrovnik merchants, and speak a mixture of Shtokavian substratum and surrounding dialects (which are mostly Torlak). I rephrased the sentence slightly again, trying to sort the groups by size. ] (]) 10:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Nicely put. I'm happy with it as it stands. I knew that the Janjevs originated from Dubrovnik and would have brought with them the contemporary speech form and over time incorporate elements of the surrounding forms. I just thought after so many centuries through natural language evolution that the two distinct forms (Janjev and Torlak) would have levelled themselves with Janjev words even permeating the wider Torlakian. Maybe this is a chapter of history where the linguisic issues have not been researched thoroughly by anybody but for the knowledge we have now, your description is clear, and well done on spotting the Gorani whom I totally forgot, and you're right to list them as an ethnicity and not subgroup of someone else. Of course there are smaller nations with the Torlak frame but there is no need for an exclusive list, so I shall keep the section as it is. Thanks for helping. ] ('''Евлекис''') 12:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Bunjevci== | |||
| Hello. I didn't notice the crap that had been going on there before it was over, but I read the discussion afterwards and felt compelled to pop by to say that I thought the "www.krivi-kurac.com" line was absolutely priceless and on point. Floors were rolled on, sir :) ] (]) 06:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah, thanks. I'm glad that anyone finally liked my contributions. ;-). ] (]) 07:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==About ALFB transliteration== | |||
| I think there is no need to delete the article. We should discuss this thing: is it useful in this Encyclopedia? I suppose, this transliteration can be a notable auxiliary romanization because of its exactness. I know, there are some people against adding this transliteration, other think that it's quite acceptable. ] (]) 11:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Npov template at Vlachs of Serbia == | |||
| First I want to apologize, I wanted to rollback as good faith and then to ask your reasons for this tag. As vandalism and AFG sometimes change places at my browser... I don`t know why. Greetings. ] (]) 06:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| OK. But putting the NPOV tag isn`t the best solution nor it can be added without a good reason. If you think that this article has some issues better to point then out and discuss them, rather then just put a "tag" on it. Greetings. ] (]) 06:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Feedback please == | |||
| Hi there, I see you nominated {{tl|20th century persecutions of the Catholic Church}} for deletion. I've added some comments at ] and would value your feedback. Thank you. <span style="background:#FDF5E6;font-family:Kristen ITC;">''''']]'''''</span> 11:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Czech regional football clubs== | |||
| You reverted all my PRODs. So you think articles like ], ], ], ] are worth keeping? They contain absolutely no references and just say this club is from there. No league, no website, nothing. -] (]) 10:57, 20 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Cool SN == | |||
| First time I think I've seen your screenname - I like. | |||
| That's all I really came to say. ] (]) 13:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :B-) ] (]) 14:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: disambiguating villages in .rs, .ba == | |||
| I'm using the simplest logical form in English, but I don't care for enforcing that foreign naming scheme :) I won't object to such harmonization, but I won't go out of my way to proliferate the scheme either - it's both an unnatural form on en: (it's doubtful any actual person will ever come looking for a parenthesized form) as well as an apparent waste of bytes (min 2 rather than min 1). Those are the likely reasons why it's not used for other, more en:-native places, and why it should be replaced. I'm guessing it was brought about by a raw import from elsewhere, and was not properly discussed in the context of en: wiki. Just for the record, I noticed hr: wiki also uses it, and I disapprove of that, too :) --] (]) 14:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| : OK, but that scheme requires me to spend even more time analyzing the article while disambiguating, to find what the right suffix is... granted, I do usually notice the municipality when it's usually in the lead sentence. It's still a clear mark of a scheme that isn't geared towards English readers - it's always a set of two foreign words, rather than a foreign word plus an English word from a relatively constrained data set (the list of countries) that they're likely to recognize. --] (]) 18:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :: BTW today I noticed an English-speaking editor started actually changing the parens into commas citing ]. You may wish to join and steer the process - see ]. --] (]) 12:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Lukovo== | |||
| Could you please decypher if ] points to a duplicate article now named ]? I just love it when people create articles with minimal geolocation... :) --] (]) 10:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :See how municipality disambiguation works? :P | |||
| :Anyway, we already have ], which is a duplicate of that article. That could be histmerged with ], although I wouldn't bother with that one sentence. | |||
| :On the other hand, we have ], which should be merged with ] and couple of church articles therein. | |||
| :In the future, please refer to ]. I'm fairly certain of its accuracy. ] (]) 11:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Boris Tadić == | |||
| Hello NSU. I had to revert you on the above article for precisely the reason you restored the word "regime", you described the term "administration" as a euphemism when in fact it is no such thing! It is only when one's feelings are so negative to a subject that, "he can no longer be a MAN but a BEAST!". The word ''regime'' if used correctly refers to an entire power base from top to bottom and the system too, all in all this is encompasses so much that there is little need to use the word on Misplaced Pages except when referring to "regime change". Why? As you may know, a change on government within a democratic system does not amount to regime change; I won't go into why but I'll jujst state that when you say this, you are acknowledging that "one regime has been replaced by another". However, you will never encounter a reference to a "regime" to mean one's own system, nor to we use the word liberally. Nowhere will you find on WP, "the Obama regime", "Angela Merkel's regime" or even "the Israeli regime". Unless we can use this word objectively and universally, it violates WP's NPOV policy. If for another reason you do not like "administration", tell me and we can work on something else as there are a few solutions. Thanks. ] ('''Евлекис''') (]) 12:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :TLDR. Anyway, when a government is universally known as a fascist dictatorship, there only NPOV is to call it that way, and "regime" is generally used for oppressive governments. You might want to count Google hits for and , as well as our own counts for the and . In such cases, "administration" refers to the bureaucratic units, not to the whole system; an "administration" does not kill people, generally. ] (]) 12:50, 30 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::That's just IT! You hit the nail on the head so I don't need to explain! One uses "regime" to refer to an "oppressive government" but never for anything else, it is therefore POV given its actual meaning is something else. Notice even you did use the word "government" which I tend to use but on this occasion I have gone for something else. I have amended the text to remove ''administration''. How do you like it at the moment? ] ('''Евлекис''') (]) 12:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Assuming bad faith with my creation of three-finger salute (balkans) article == | |||
| You have condemned me for creating the article on the three-finger salute in the Balkans and have questioned my motivations for creating it. That is assuming bad faith - that is against Misplaced Pages etiquette policy - users are to assume good faith.--] (]) 13:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Petrovac == | |||
| The problem with that discussion, was that it was not clear what the correct name should be. Several names were mentioned, but I did not see a case being made for any of these based on ]. Also no information was presented to help indicate which name is most frequently used in reliable sources, only a discussion about one book. So given that, there simply was no case that I could see saying that this should be moved. I have no objection to you opening another discussion, but you will need to build a clear case or the outcome will be the same. Also how other wikis list this does not help since they have different guidelines and policies. The relisting I did was a clear indication that a no consensus close was likely. With no comments posted after that, the no consensus close should not come as a surprise. Is there some naming convention that was not mentioned that would give me grounds to change the close? ] (]) 18:32, 21 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==New Page Patrol survey== | |||
| {| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5" | |||
| | ] | |||
| <big>'''New page patrol – ''Survey Invitation'''''</big> | |||
| ---- | |||
| Hello {{PAGENAME}}! The ] is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. | |||
| *If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. | |||
| *If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. | |||
| '''Please click to take part.'''<br> | |||
| Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see ]</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| == BCS spelling (RDL) == | |||
| Your response is much appreciated. I posted a follow-up question in that thread, and I'm alerting you about it in case you're not watching the page, which already got archived as a separate one. You seem to be quite knowledgeable about Serbo-Croat linguistics, and I'm sure you'll be able to reply again if you wish. No need to alert me if you choose to reply - I'm watching the page. --] (]) 23:02, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Census == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| I have seen your message regarding the edits I have made to Serbian cities during Census 2011. The reason for my edit is that the municipality data is the only available data to date, and in Serbia a city's population generally includes the entire population under the administration of the local authority. | |||
| I will, however, distinguish between Urban and Municipal populations when I receive the first preliminary results from the Statistics office of Serbia as this is the norm on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| Thanks for the heads up! | |||
| Regards, | |||
| Darko <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:38, 31 October 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == 498 Spanish Martyrs == | |||
| You added a ] to this article a while ago, which is never a good idea. There was ] to explain what the problem was, so ].<br> | |||
| The article had already been to make it more neutral,(as explained ]); perhaps you’d care to elaborate what exactly you see the problem as? ] (]) 12:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Your highness == | |||
| Excuse me, but I couldn't help but notice you seem to be removing some '''facts''' (not untrue, but sourced, truthful) that other members post on some pages especially on page of Belgrade. For example, the ''one of the largest cities in s.e. Europe'' seems to bother you. Please, don't behave like you own the Belgrade page, or like you are a king of Misplaced Pages pages. Respect others' work and keep in mind that something you don't like is aproved by more users and is relevant and makes an article better, more completed. Other work you do is excellent like removing untrue datas and improving some other articles. | |||
| Have my regards. '''Belgrade011''' <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :There is no need for ]. I might be stubborn on occasion, but I'm not unreasonable (well, unless someone wants to import one of those silly collages to the infobox). | |||
| :I don't have a big issue with having something like that in the lead, but I do have an issue that nobody wants to discuss it (and many other things) on the talk page. But, since the topic is of greater audience, I'll continue on ]. ] (]) 12:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit to Serbia == | |||
| I created a ] to discuss the edit to Serbia that I reverted. ] - ] 09:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
| Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
| Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==My Skiathos picture== | |||
| Dude, what is your problem? Why do you keep deleting my picture! It IS different from the other ones, and it clutters the text the same way that other pics do! KNOCK IT OFF!!!!!! Just please, knock it off and let it be!!!!! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Regarding lede and edit warring == | |||
| this is what I wrote: | |||
| I did give reasons, about CONSISTENCY with other WP articles. With Calabria, for example, you see "region of Italy" right in the opening sentence. But for some stupid reason, you have biased editors not doing that with Sicily, with the opening sentence. Just putting idiotically in the first sentence "largest island in Mediterranean" is (again I'll say it) NOT CONSISTENT with other WP articles with opening sentences, in the lede. So simply put, you're both wrong. The point is this though too. NoSuchUser has NO business reverting anything that is accurate, just because "]." (Or because he may think it's a bit redundant, which is debatable in a sense, but ignores the fact that every single other article on regions of Italy, have the words "region of Italy" in the very first sentence.) Putting "region of southern Italy" in the opening line is accurate, valid, sourced, and good-faith. WP policy and recommendation is NOT to revert. If one bothers to read the policy on this matter. And he's just plain wrong when he says that he's not required to give a reason for reverting. Uh, yeah, he does have to give a reason or "explain" according to WP policy and recommendation. But regardless, I DID give an explanation for that, and there's no valid reason to revert, simply because this perhaps biased editor "NoSuchUser" does not like it read that way. He does not own this article, yet in this matter he's acting as if he does. Not cool. Again, saying "region of southern Italy" is simply a fact, and is sourced...and I'll say it again...IS MORE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER WP ARTICLES...regarding regions of Italy articles. Case closed. Regards. ] (]) 20:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Assumptions and clarity... == | |||
| I did read the second sentence. A long time ago. And you're presumptuous to think I never did. And it doesn't matter though. And it doesn't really matter about Sardinia, because that's wrong too. And I knew about that already. And that's why I said GENERALLY consistent. Also, as I said before, it doesn't matter about 150 years ago, as it's dealing with what it is NOW. And it doesn't matter that it's an island, because that's not really the main issue as to Sicily being Italian or part of Italy. You know how many ignorant morons are in the world who think that Sicily is a separate country???? Too many. And putting an idiotic lede of only "largest island in Mediterranean", if they don't bother to read the second sentence (which many won't) will only tend to foster that ignoramus idiocy. Sicily is part of Italy, and that should be made clear RIGHT OFF THE BAT. Also, it's MORE consistent with how other regions of Italy are in WP articles. Also, again, you have NO business reverting an edit that is technically accurate and sourced, simply because you don't personally like it or have problems with it. According to WP policy and recommendation. I'm tired of this with you. For real. ] (]) 13:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Now I'm done with you == | |||
| First of all, that block has NOTHING to do with this (and it was 24 hours not 48, and the other person got blocked also for violating 3RR). Number two: I never called you or anyone an "idiot". Not sure where you're seeing that. So stop lying and stop hallucinating. Number three: you have posted on MY page, but somehow it's wrong for me to post on yours. Number four: about number one, do you know that the other person was ALSO blocked for violating 3RR that I myself reported on, and also it was a 24 hour block, not 48 hours. Again, that has nothing to do with this. I could have been blocked, about something else, and you could still be technically wrong on this matter. So don't be biased and arrogant with me. And don't accuse me of calling "idiot" when I never did. After this, I'm through with you. I won't even acknowledge anything you write or say to me. I knew you had issues way in the past, with that uptight nonsense about photos, that you brought up again that has nothing to do with the lede. You're out of line, and I'm writing you off. But if you undo any edit on that article, for no reason again, I'll just undo you (but I'll keep it at 3RR, so I won't get a 24 hour block that you can throw in my face, idiotically.) I'm done. ] (]) 13:50, 29 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, I suppose we'll have to explain this on ]. Consider yourself informed. ] (]) 13:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Dead link in article ']' == | |||
| Hi. The article ']' has a ] that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it? | |||
| Dead: http://www.psd-kopaonik.org.rs/03KatalogplaninaSrbije.html | |||
| * You added this . | |||
| <!--</includeonly>* The bot tested this link on {{{checkdates}}}, but it never worked.<includeonly>--> | |||
| * The bot checked The ] and ] but couldn't find a ] replacement. | |||
| This link is marked with {{tl|Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at ] and fix what you can. Thank you! | |||
| PS- ''you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Tlx|Bots|deny{{=}}BlevintronBot }} to your user page or user talk page.'' | |||
| ] (]) 06:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == No such user, you are invited! == | |||
| {{Template:BUProjectInvite}} | |||
| == Hell o == | |||
| Hi, there, whoever you are. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for September 6== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == AM anonymous sockpuppeteering == | |||
| Please see ]. --] (]) 15:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Contact== | |||
| Do you have email? ] 05:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I'd rather not discuss politics over e-mail, and I think it wouldn't be productive for our dispute anyway. I certainly do not want to use your topic ban as a tool against you, and I mentioned your attitude about WW2 Serbia just as an aside; I do not plan to pursue that line of debate. ] (]) 06:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::There is some other issue that I want to discuss with you via email, but if you do not want that, no problem. ] 07:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hungarian Names== | |||
| First, show it and secondly, it is far to say that they are equivalent to the official names. The signs have only Serbian names and post addresses also right???logically in Serbian. In Berlin for example are more than 15 % Turks and the Name is ONLY Berlin ect. | |||
| And the cenusu from 2002 is outdated. --] (]) 09:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :So what if it's outdated? Percentages are only the basis for the municipal decision, not the end of it. It is really poor excuse. ] (]) 10:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration enforcement == | |||
| There is new thread on arbitration enforcement forum that might be interesting to you - http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#DIREKTOR ] (]) 13:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| For your support on the Byzantine page.--] (]) 06:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :You're welcome. ] (]) 18:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == medeis == | |||
| Thanks, I answered you at length on my talk page. ] (]) 01:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for January 9== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Thanks for stepping in over at ]. —] (]) 18:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Srbobran, Vukovar == | |||
| It may actually just be real-world spilling over. In the case of Vukovar, the Cyrillic spelling is not official, but since the 2011 census the prerequisites are there, and the procedure to update the city statute is in progress. I'll reference it in the article. | |||
| I see the three anonymous IPs used to hurl insults at you are blocked, please feel free to let me know if you need intervention about that, although it should be noted that my involvement may only contribute to their sense of being persecuted (ironically enough). --] (]) 17:51, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for May 20== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 00:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for June 6== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I have withdrawn my nomination at ]. Are you a Serbian speaker? Could I ask that you add a sentence to the article supported by the refs? ] (]) 07:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. Done. I also cleaned the article up and moved it to a simpler title. ] (]) 09:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for June 14== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for June 21== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Bokisanisa == | |||
| What is going on with this user, Bokisanisa? That is obvious sock puppet of several editors from before, including {{User|Ekselent}} and a lot more. Should this be reported to SPI? Edits are a bit questionable, and i dont see any talk page activity. --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 14:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I thought Bokisanisa had good intentions, but I'm having second thoughts. A lot of small, obscure (and unreferenced) edits on Serbian mountains of questionable validity. SPI is of no use, it is not forbidden to change the account (and it's obviously the same person). Let's have an eye on him and wait... ] (]) 20:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 11:32, 27 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for July 31== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Voivoda == | |||
| Since you help sort out fact i will translate you text from Serbian Misplaced Pages written by me, form 4 books that all have ISBN code. | |||
| Text translated: | |||
| ''Voivoda (Duke) was the highest rank in the army of the Kingdom of Serbia and Kingdom of Yugoslavia before the Second world war. Introduced by the Law on the Organization of the Kingdom of Serbia in 1901. at the suggestion of then Defense Minister Colonel Milos Vasic, who was his creator. It has been awarded only during the war, such as: special merits top generals. Voivode rank for general made the changes in the officer ranks. Instead of the former division of the upper and lower core, introduced a new category - Generals, made up of the two highest rank - general and voivoda. In this rank where promoted generals during the Balkan Wars and the First World War. The Army of the Kingdom of Serbia and Kingdom of SHS (Kingdom of Yugoslavia) had four Voivoda (Duke's): Radomir Putnik, Stepa Stepanović, Živojina Musić and Peter Bojović. In the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the honorary title of Voivoda was awarded a French Marshal Franchet d'Epere for his contribution to Serbia during World War I. The Army of the Kingdom of SHS (Kingdom of Yugoslavia) was made the new general's of the new law in 1923. By which the rank of general was divided into four instead of two ranks. This was done by the French system of grading: Brigadier General, Divisional General, Army General and the Voivoda (Duke) who remained highest and honorable rank. King Peter, King Alexander I and King Peter II as supreme commanders did not wear the rank but were considered to be honorary Voivoda's (Duke's). Before this act, an honorary rank in the army of the Kingdom of Serbia in 1900. up in 1901. was an army general.'' | |||
| Thats all part form article but i can scan book to prove that he's wrong. What you think. And King of Yugoslavia was only supreme commander but he wear Voivoda rank epaulets. | |||
| Thats for the help and support. <sup>] ]</sup> 22:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Um, isn't it obvious that I '''can''' read Serbian? But, Peacemaker wasn't asking for translation of that sr.wp passage (Google Translate does a decent job of it), but for the relevant book passage.<br/>But anyway, what is being contested at all? I think we proved that ''Field Marshal'' is a translation/equivalent of the term ''vojvoda/voivode'', so it's more or less editors' choice which one to use. I don't think the issue is so important to deserve wasted kilobytes of discussion. Why don't you add those clarifications and references to ], for the start? ] (]) 07:01, 8 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==RS 1990-2006 article== | |||
| Please see ]. --] (]) 06:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{talkback|Vanjagenije|Commons:Deletion_requests/Not_official_materials2}} | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for August 22== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Information == | |||
| Hello, please be aware that on English wikipedia we have the ]. Greetings. ] (]) 07:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| === 3rr Board === | |||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. | |||
| Hello, I have created the dispute resolution thread, as suggested by the administrators. Here is the link . ] (]) 07:42, 19 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi! I saw that you already worked on ]. Do you feel like helping me with local names and interpretations. I don't speak Serbian and am therefore confined to international literature. I would like to bring all regional geology articles of Europe to B-class. --] (]) 10:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Sure. I started working on the article, but then realized I didn't have enough expertise. If you have any questions, just ask on the article's talk page (I'm a bit busy in RL this week). ] (]) 23:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. == | |||
| ] | |||
| This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". | |||
| Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> | |||
| My apologies, I mispelled your name when filing to DRN, and the bot didn't notify you. --] (]) 14:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for October 26== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussion of interest == | |||
| A discussion you may be interested in is ], a proposal to make the second comma in a date/place optional. ] (]) 05:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Lfdder == | |||
| Ah, yes, I seem to have selected the wrong diff. Normally I'd avoid blocking someone for a comment directed at me, but when it's someone I've never interacted with before, I don't worry about it much. FWIW, I take someone with three civility blocks over the last three months (somewhat equally spaced) as engaging in a continuous pattern of bad behaviour, not having some old problems they've moved past. ]<font color="FF8800">]</font> 07:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:16, 19 November 2024
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)