| Revision as of 11:43, 6 January 2013 editSeraphimblade (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators46,393 edits Notice of community sanction← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:46, 22 March 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,308,615 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Apteva/Archive 12) (bot | ||
| (837 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 60K | |maxarchivesize = 60K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 12 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(5d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Apteva/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Apteva/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> - ] (]) 08:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC) | I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> - ] (]) 08:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| <timeline> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ImageSize = width:530 height:240 | |||
| PlotArea = width:480 height:150 left:40 bottom:40 | |||
| AlignBars = late | |||
| DateFormat = x.y | |||
| Hello Apteva<br> | |||
| Period = from:0 till:70 | |||
| I was trying to fix the RM for this page and a) didn't notice 'til now that you'd already fixed it, and b) managed to cock it up even worse. My apologies! Have you any idea how to fix it? ] (]) 12:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| TimeAxis = orientation:vertical | |||
| :See this diff{{diff|American Academy of Nurse Practitioners|531320767|531252384}}. There are hidden characters in the year that are messing up the bot but I have no idea what they are or how to avoid them. ] (]) 19:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ScaleMajor = unit:month increment:20 start:0 | |||
| TextData = | |||
| == Ban sought == | |||
| pos:(260,25) textcolor:black fontsize:S | |||
| text:July | |||
| pos:(240,225) textcolor:black fontsize:M | |||
| text:RM Backlog | |||
| Colors = | |||
| I have called for a ban at ]. I expect you'll want to respond. ] (]) 21:24, 4 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| id:blue value:red | |||
| PlotData= | |||
| == Regarding all the commotion == | |||
| width:10 textcolor:black shift:(-10,70) | |||
| bar: 1 color:red from:0 till: 6 | |||
| bar: 2 color:red from:0 till: 4 | |||
| bar: 3 color:red from:0 till: 11 | |||
| bar: 4 color:red from:0 till: 9 | |||
| bar: 5 color:red from:0 till: 26 | |||
| bar: 6 color:red from:0 till: 32 | |||
| bar: 7 color:red from:0 till: 32 | |||
| bar: 8 color:red from:0 till: 55 | |||
| bar: 9 color:red from:0 till: 55 | |||
| bar: 10 color:red from:0 till: 63 | |||
| bar: 11 color:red from:0 till: 36 | |||
| bar: 12 color:red from:0 till: 48 | |||
| bar: 13 color:red from:0 till: 57 | |||
| bar: 14 color:red from:0 till: 55 | |||
| bar: 15 color:red from:0 till: 41 | |||
| bar: 16 color:red from:0 till: 38 | |||
| bar: 17 color:red from:0 till: 40 | |||
| bar: 18 color:red from:0 till: 26 | |||
| bar: 19 color:red from:0 till: 25 | |||
| bar: 20 color:red from:0 till: 23 | |||
| bar: 21 color:red from:0 till: 27 | |||
| bar: 22 color:red from:0 till: 43 | |||
| bar: 23 color:red from:0 till: 21 | |||
| bar: 24 color:red from:0 till: 23 | |||
| bar: 25 color:red from:0 till: 26 | |||
| bar: 26 color:red from:0 till: 23 | |||
| bar: 27 color:red from:0 till: 31 | |||
| bar: 28 color:red from:0 till: 33 | |||
| bar: 29 color:red from:0 till: 8 | |||
| bar: 30 color:red from:0 till: 0 | |||
| </timeline> | |||
| <timeline> | |||
| Well, we've all watched as the hubbub at the RfC concluded, with the process now moving into other forums. At any rate, I'd like to express a view that I would guess many other editors share at the moment. While sympathetic to your views regarding the appropriateness of dash and hyphen forms, I think that a consensus has been reached regarding the matter. Despite the diversity of opinions regarding the matter, one particular interpretation has been determined here. It is possible that you are indeed correct; however, things have deescalated on both sides to a point where the debate over dash use has become a distraction and something of a problem. I sincerely hope that you would be willing to give in on this one. Even if you continue advocating for your opinions on the matter, and even if the edits you've done aren't necessarily disruptions or inappropriate actions, things have really gotten out of hand. If you would be willing to abide by some of the requests made at the RfC, I think many editors would be able to focus their energies elsewhere, and, perhaps, there might be a more receptive forum to your ideas at some point in the future. ] | ] 23:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ImageSize = width:530 height:240 | |||
| :All of the drama is a direct result of the lack of civility at the MOS. Hopefully that will change. ] (]) 00:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| PlotArea = width:480 height:150 left:40 bottom:40 | |||
| ::Perhaps things haven't been ideal all around; I think, however, that quieting things down regarding this dispute would be in everyone's best interests right now. ] | ] 00:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| AlignBars = late | |||
| :::Could not agree more. I was joking that if I wanted to make sure that someone failed their RfA, all I had to do was support it, and there would be at least 28 editors who I can think of who would automatically oppose, just because of not wanting to agree with me ''on anything''. ] (]) 00:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I hope I'm not being an annoyance here, but I guess I have one last thing to say. Would you possibly consider the option of voluntarily abstaining from these discussions for a time; during that period, you could devote yourself to your content development work. That way, things can relax, and you would be able to withdraw from this issue without the baggage of a topic ban, which might be inevitable given how discussion has been going. At any rate, I wish you the best during this problem, and hope that you consider moving away from the issue of dashes for a while. ] | ] 01:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::That sounds fair enough. ] (]) 01:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::By the way, my talk page is always open, and I always take criticism seriously. Nothing is ever deleted, other than conversations started on another user's talk page or any talkback messages. I may be missing something else, but that has always been my policy. ] (]) 01:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Thanks for your openness and for considering this; again, best of luck in the future. ] | ] 01:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Thanks, you too. ] (]) 02:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| DateFormat = x.y | |||
| == Voluntary step aside, for a time == | |||
| Period = from:0 till:60 | |||
| TimeAxis = orientation:vertical | |||
| ScaleMajor = unit:month increment:5 start:0 | |||
| TextData = | |||
| Would you be willing to do that temporary "recusal" from the dash-or-hyphen dispute? If you are, I'd suggest putting your response at the admins' noticeboard; that way, the problem can be resolved ''sans'' sanctions and ''sans'' more drama. Cheers, and a Happy New Year, ] | ] 04:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| pos:(260,25) textcolor:black fontsize:S | |||
| :It already is there, but I will take a look. ] (]) 04:58, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| text:Time | |||
| pos:(220,225) textcolor:black fontsize:M | |||
| text:RM Backlog 29 June 2013 | |||
| Colors = | |||
| Apteva, I would really advise avoiding further conversation within the topic ban discussion over at the Administrator's noticeboard. There are some editors who will support a topic ban just because they see you are defending yourself in the debate. And I do think the "Alternate Proposal" section is shooting yourself in the foot. You brought up the incivility on MOS debates in a discussion about topic banning you. Some editors will view that as attempting to deflect the conversation, so you may wish to consider striking the proposal. | |||
| id:blue value:red | |||
| PlotData= | |||
| As for defending you, right now there are enough editors opposed to the topic ban that you don't need to worry about it. The best thing you can do right now is to go back to improving articles. You have waded into a small portion of a much larger Manual of Style debate. My second suggestion would be to stop trying to get the policy changed regarding em dashes and dashes. Yes, it is silly having titles using em dash when every reader on the planet is going to type in a dash, but is it really worth getting blocks or bans over a few extra pixels? The policy is never going to change due to the widespread use, you need to accept that and move on. Now I don't mean to be blunt, but if you continue this it isn't going to end well. Best wishes, ] ] 10:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| width:10 textcolor:black shift:(-10,70) | |||
| *Alas, things haven't gone well at the noticeboard, and it appears a topic ban may be the only possible resolution for the issue. I would still advise that you make an explicit statement - new one - that says that you will voluntarily abstain. ] | ] 20:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| bar: 0 color:red from:0 till: 58 | |||
| bar: 1 color:red from:0 till: 55 | |||
| bar: 2 color:red from:0 till: 55 | |||
| bar: 3 color:red from:0 till: 47 | |||
| bar: 4 color:red from:0 till: 46 | |||
| bar: 5 color:red from:0 till: 46 | |||
| bar: 6 color:red from:0 till: 42 | |||
| bar: 7 color:red from:0 till: 27 | |||
| bar: 8 color:red from:0 till: 27 | |||
| bar: 9 color:red from:0 till: 27 | |||
| bar: 10 color:red from:0 till: 27 | |||
| bar: 11 color:red from:0 till: 27 | |||
| bar: 12 color:red from:0 till: 27 | |||
| bar: 13 color:red from:0 till: 21 | |||
| bar: 14 color:red from:0 till: 10 | |||
| bar: 15 color:red from:0 till: 9 | |||
| bar: 16 color:red from:0 till: 9 | |||
| bar: 17 color:red from:0 till: 5 | |||
| bar: 18 color:red from:0 till: 0 | |||
| bar: 19 color:red from:0 till: 0 | |||
| bar: 20 color:red from:0 till: 0 | |||
| bar: 21 color:red from:0 till: 0 | |||
| bar: 22 color:red from:0 till: 0 | |||
| bar: 23 color:red from:0 till: 0 | |||
| bar: 24 color:red from:0 till: 0 | |||
| </timeline> | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| '''Thanks for avoiding future MOS:''' Wow, I see others appreciate your widespread work on Misplaced Pages, so I too am happy to see you take the high ground and step away from the fight. I had thought that there were more mainstream editors aware of the issues, but another hounded editor recently noted the low pageviews of wp:MOS (), as only 120 per day, but "~Manual_of_Style" gets 1,300 daily pageviews (). Evidentally, long-term editors (typing "wp:MOS") do not much care, but 1,300 newcomers initially wonder and click on "~Manual_of_Style" until they check it out (and eyes glaze over). I honestly did not realize that long-term editors ''forgetaboutit''. So, I am glad that you have been moving on to the important stuff now. Whatever happens at wp:AN, you are thankfully out of that prior mess. -] (]) 07:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Apteva. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| *Manual of Style averages , showing that it's ]. ] (]) 08:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Asia topic == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| As a participant of the discussion ] regarding naming change of the page ], you might be interested in discussion ] on changing the title "Palestinian territories" to "State of Palestine" at ]. Thank you.] (]) 22:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| :Thanks, but not interested. In general it is pointless to <s>canvass</s> notify me on issues such as this. ] (]) 23:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/30&oldid=750612131 --> | |||
| ::Just in defense of Greyshark; this doesn't appear to be canvassing. ] <small>(] | ])</small> 06:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::True. But I regularly look over all of the proposed RMs so telling me about one is pointless. In this case it is more of a meta discussion of "Palestine" vs "Palestinian territories", of which I have really said all I need to say on the issue. But irregardless, I edit thousands of articles via ] and other than the hundreds that I return to regularly already, I have little to no interest in being called back to revisit any of the others. I see a lot of "I know you are interested" or "you might be interested" posts on other editors talk pages. For me, if I was interested I would likely already go there on my own. ] (]) 06:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Photovoltaic power station== | |||
| ==Notice of community sanction== | |||
| I have started an individual good article reassessment of ] which was rated "good" in 2013 and I think it needs modernizing. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| Based upon community consensus at the ], the following sanction is in place with immediate effect: | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Apteva is ] indefinitely from modifying or discussing the use of dashes, hyphens, or similar types of punctuation, broadly construed, including but not limited to at the ] and any ] discussion. Apteva may appeal these restrictions by filing at the administrators' noticeboard after a reasonable amount of time has passed. Violation of this ban may be reported at the incident noticeboard and may result in a block from any uninvolved administrator. | |||
| <blockquote>'''Non-notable cancelled project'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| If you have any questions regarding the specifics of this sanction, please feel free to ask. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 11:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ]<sup>]</sup> 17:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''Apparently unsuccessful proposal lacks notability'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ]<sup>]</sup> 16:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''Notability not established with substantive independent sources'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ]<sup>]</sup> 05:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:46, 22 March 2023
 Archives | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Welcome!
Hello, Apteva, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Darwinek (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Apteva. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Photovoltaic power station
I have started an individual good article reassessment of Photovoltaic power station which was rated "good" in 2013 and I think it needs modernizing. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Rancho Cielo Solar Farm
The article Rancho Cielo Solar Farm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable cancelled project
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92 17:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Solenha
The article Solenha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Apparently unsuccessful proposal lacks notability
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92 16:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Western Systems Power Pool
The article Western Systems Power Pool has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability not established with substantive independent sources
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92 05:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)