| Revision as of 19:08, 7 April 2011 editSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,613 edits Unblock declined and BLP-banned← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:26, 8 April 2023 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,585,385 edits Replacing/removing expired templates: {{Show by date}} (please review this edit) | ||
| (650 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <br clear="all/> | |||
| <p style="font-size:3em; text-align:center; margin-bottom:0.2em">]</p> | |||
| ⚫ | {{archivebox|auto=yes|image=]}} | ||
| ] | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 3 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(1d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Damiens.rf/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Damiens.rf/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == RE: reverting ] == | |||
| ⚫ | {{archivebox|auto=yes|image=]}} | ||
| Hey, instead of taking the easy way out and reverting my edit, why don't you contribute to the community by Googling around and citing a source yourself, you laggard ineffectual douchebag? Here, I'll make your job even easier and paste the source right here: http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ | |||
| == Sfarrer == | |||
| ==Re:hanging editor's comment== | |||
| Please can you explain why you have arbitrarily decided that my page (Malcolm Phipps) is not good enough for Misplaced Pages - if you are so concerned about standards perhaps constructive criticism would be the better path to take ie. tell me what you (and I stress the you, as it is only your opinion) think is wrong, rather than just deleting the whole page. Having looked at other pages of notable karate people, I don't see any difference between their pages and mine. Please explain yourself. ] (]) 11:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| What the heck, when you are right, you are right. ] (]) | |||
| :The article as you wrote had to many problems to be fixed. It was better to restart from scratch. You should consider familiarizing yourself with ], ] and ], to begin with. --] 14:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Top Banana == | ||
| You stop reverting it. And it's not "your work", wikipedia is a community collaboration. You just want to get into an edit war.Top Banana the group is more notable than the guesthouse listed there and which you do not mind having. '']'' (]) 05;42, August 14, 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Joyeux Noël== | |||
| Thanks for the ], or really the lack thereof. I think your concern should be focused on your ] of the many articles you've reinstated your ] on after a lengthy time of uninvolvement once your versions were reverted with ] and per policy. I'm strongly considering a user conduct RFC to protect WP from further disruption by you. ] <small>]</small> 17:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="toccolours" align="center" style="clear: both; | |||
| == Your Copyright judgement credentials == | |||
| |align="center" |] | |||
| !bgcolor="#ccccff" |<font=3>Les vœux de vous <br>"Joyeux Noël et Bonne année"</font><br>(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year)<br>] (])<br> | |||
| |align="center" |] | |||
| |} | |||
| == ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
| Since you seem to be heavily involved with copyright issues, can you please link your qualifications for judging copyright and fair usage? I ask because from the few pieces of work I've looked at so far you seem to have a very exclusionary viewpoint that seems to be out of line with the community's viewpoint. Thanks ] (]) 23:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Damiens - I think that a reasonable majority of people support enforcing NFCC as written, but you seem to be interpreting it in an exceptionally exclusionary manner. Until you get more community support for your position on interpreting it, please stop editing in a disruptive manner and removing images as you have been. This is not OK. You can work through the consensus process to move or adjust consensus and written policy - but you aren't allowed to disruptively try to subvert it. Your ongoing behavior here is across the line right now. Please stop. ] (]) 00:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::I do not rely on credentials, but in arguments. --] 00:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == Edit war report == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| I've reported you ] for edit warring. ] <small>]</small> 01:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :The article was protected instead of a block. But if you continue edit warring, this may not be the next result. Discuss on talk pages instead. ] <small>]</small> 02:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == AGF == | |||
| </div> | |||
| I fixed too. Sorry, forgot to ] for a moment... :) ] <small>]</small> 16:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :You're much welcome. --] 16:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1124425182 --> | |||
| :But in such cases it's better to strike out the retracted text, instead of removing it, so that other user's replies don't look out of line. But thanks, anyway. --] 16:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::I thought you might revise yours too...to match... :) ] <small>]</small> 16:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==COI== | |||
| I'll look closely at the text sourced to blogs later today but in general Sanchez is stating her experience and opinion and as long as that is attributed there is no concern with using a blog per Misplaced Pages. Self serving refers more to statements which might inflate a person beyond the ordinary which non of this text does in Sanchez's case. As well... I have you watch listed, and this statement which I found on Dreadstar's user talk page is troubling and indicates you have a bias and possibly Conflict of interest per this BLP. This statement is especially a concern. ''What she writes about herself and about her country is never uncontroversial. '''That's a political blog whose author takes money from an enemy country'''. In a country like U.S.A., she would hardly be free at this time.'' I suggest you take great care with what you edit into the article given this statement unless you wisely decide to not edit it at all on this article, and just use the talk page to voice your concerns and comments. There is no leewaay for POV editing, most especially in a BLP article. Something to think about.(] (]) 18:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC)) | |||
| :What's exactly the problems with why I said? Aren't you being a little US centric? Please, elaborate on that accusation. | |||
| :I'm the one removing the pov existing in the article. At least on the biography section, the article repeats her account of facts as if her blog was an reliable independent source, what it's not. For instance, her account of why she left Cuba and why and how she came back is self-serving and unbalanced. --] 18:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::No. I'm not disclosing either my political position which has no place on Misplaced Pages, nor my nationality. I'm suggesting you take care. You've amply indicated your position. Best wishes.(] (]) 19:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)) | |||
| :::Have I disclosed any political position in that statement? (My nationality is not a secret). Are you sure you've read it correctly? --] 19:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == April 2011 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for contravening Misplaced Pages's ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 16:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-bioblock --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=Kira Reed is a porn star: See (NSFW). She doesn't seem to have a problem with it, as seen on this interview . Damiens.rf 16:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | decline=You have edit-warred to call a living person a "porn star" in the article about them, without providing a reliable source in the form of a inline citation for this change, as you are required to per ]: , , and previously . This is a severe violation of our policies ] and ]. Your unblock request indicates that you do not understand this problem. Even if the person "is" a porn star, it is a violation of ] to call her one without providing a source, especially if this change has already been challenged by others. <p>For this reason, and considering your block log, I believe that the current time-limited block is not sufficient to prevent continued violation of ] by you. Considering that you have been previously warned about the sourcing requirements of ] (), in application and enforcement of ], I am hereby banning you from making edits about living persons for the duration of three months. That is, you may make no edits to articles about living persons, and you may make no edits that add, change or remove any information about a living person on any page (except as described at ]). If you violate this ban you may be blocked or restricted further without warning. This ban can be appealed as described at ]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)}} | |||
| :I hope this unblock request won't take longer to be replied due to admins ] the links I've post in my defense. --] 16:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Given your own fact-tag blitz, it's ironic that you were edit-warring over trying to impose your personal opinion. There's nothing whatsoever in the article that qalifies Reed as a "porn star". ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 17:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::The article is a completely unsourced BLP, and should actually just read "''Kira Reed is an actress{{fact}}''". When the admins stop "analyzing" the links I've provided above, they could unblock me and I volunteer to fix the article. --] 17:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Are you suggesting that your "porn star" entry was satirical? ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 17:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Not really. I just thought it was supposed to be uncontroversial. But apparently, I was wrong. I was planing to source / clean the whole article later. Bad choice of priorities, I believe. --] 18:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Damiens, would you like to choose a different word/link to describe the administrative review of your unblock? I tend to think that your choice of verb to describe the review as in extremely poor taste. ] (]) 17:57, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::Given the link posted in the unblock request, I suspect he was just being funny. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 18:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes, Hasteur. Relax. Misplaced Pages can handle a little bit of humor. --] 18:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:26, 8 April 2023
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
RE: reverting Jason Narvy
Hey, instead of taking the easy way out and reverting my edit, why don't you contribute to the community by Googling around and citing a source yourself, you laggard ineffectual douchebag? Here, I'll make your job even easier and paste the source right here: http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/
Re:hanging editor's comment
What the heck, when you are right, you are right. Tony the Marine (talk)
Top Banana
You stop reverting it. And it's not "your work", wikipedia is a community collaboration. You just want to get into an edit war.Top Banana the group is more notable than the guesthouse listed there and which you do not mind having. Antonio Camilo Martin (dime aca) 05;42, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
Joyeux Noël
|
<font=3>Les vœux de vous "Joyeux Noël et Bonne année" (Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year) Tony the Marine (talk) |
|
|---|
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)