| Revision as of 11:34, 25 August 2009 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,301 edits →Non-free images in userspace: rp← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:13, 15 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (152 intermediate revisions by 44 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |||
| |counter = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(365d) | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 10 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |archive = User talk:Logos/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{talkheader}} | {{talkheader}} | ||
| {{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} | |||
| == Research assistance == | |||
| ==Little context in ]== | |||
| ]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|] (] '''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see ] for our minimum information | |||
| standards for short articles. <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to contact the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click ''' ] (]) 15:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I have been given access to a number of sources via ] and also have a decent set of research resources. If you would like assistance in accessing a particular source you can leave me a message on my talk page and I will do my best. I offer this assistance for both verification and research. I may not have access to any particular source but will give it a shot. I am open to requests on all sides of issues, being strongly committed to NPOV and desiring above all to improve the encyclopedia. Providing some material will require email correspondence. I would make clear that my privacy should be maintained (non disclosure of my email, personal information etc.) and that if I provide you with copyrighted material it is as fair use for research purposes under the terms and conditions my access and that it may not be reproduced or distributed in any way. Best. - - ] (]) 12:39, 26 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Speedy deletion of "Great White (pyramid)" == | |||
| == FYI == | |||
| ] A page you created, ], has been tagged for ], as it meets one or more of the ]; specifically, it is a test page. Use the ] for testing. | |||
| A sockpuppet investigation has been filed at ] ] (]) 23:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines == | |||
| You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our ] and any applicable ]. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our ] and ]. | |||
| "The purpose of a Misplaced Pages talk page (accessible via the talk or discussion tab) is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page." Your recent post on the Atlantis talk page had nothing to do with that. ] (]) 18:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::No; my post on the atlantis talk page had/has a lot to do with improving the article. Ancient scrolls written in ancient greek may have some references to a lost continent. You should wait until all the scrolls deciphered. | |||
| Thank you. ] (]) 19:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::In order for a material to fall under the clause 4 of ], its "unsuitableness" should be very obvious (like some of the past posts). Otherwise, removing a material whose unsuitableness is ambiguous would be exploiting a "guideline" as if it had a power of a "policy". You should remember that guidelines are "'''''sets of best practices that are supported by consensus'''''". While "'''''editors should attempt to follow guidelines'''''", "'''''they are best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply'''''". That is, while editors "'''''should follow'''''" policies, they should at best "'''''attempt to follow'''''" guidelines. ] (]) 23:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == bender235 socking == | |||
| ==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see ] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content. | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/bender235 I opened this up. Edward/Bender continues to troll the Atlantis page, its obvious from their edits and behavior Edward and bender are the same person. ] (]) 17:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontext-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 22:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Pyramids of Mars (remains on Mars)== | |||
| ]I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 09:26, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Please stop attempting to add a link to the above article to ]. Elkins was a paranormal researcher and ufologist. He has no relevance whatsoever to the subject of Egypt's pyramids. --] (]) 13:22, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 --> | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 08:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Donquixote.JPG== | |||
| <span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 02:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == November 2008 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Egyptian pyramids|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 13:31, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| ==Edit warring== | |||
| You are the one edit-warring here. The material you're adding is irrelevant to the topics. If you continue, you will be blocked. <b>] ]</b> 16:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Logos. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| ] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits{{#if:|, such as those you made to ]}}. If you ] Misplaced Pages again, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> <b>] ]</b> 20:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| :Since you refuse to discuss the article and continue to revert after a warning I have reported you to ]. Please stop your edit warring and discuss your edits on the talk page ] (]) 22:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Cydonia Mensae == | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/32&oldid=750617622 --> | |||
| == the law of one == | |||
| Hi there ]. Just to say that I've trimmed the images that you added to ]. Several of them are repetitive of existing pictures, and all of them are not attributed properly, so may wind up being deleted. Anyway, I've kept the one of the so-called pyramid, since that illustrates a neighbouring feature to the Face. If you've any questions, just drop me a line. Cheers, --] 22:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I think it is time to try and reinstate the law of one wikipedia article. | |||
| :P.S. I've just noticed that you've upgraded the attribution of some of the images. Good, but I'd still question the need for multiple images of essentially the same thing on the page. Cheers, --] 22:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I will help--]<sup>]</sup> 15:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Fixed your talk page archiving == | |||
| ::Hi there plumbago. Not the same thing. First image was taken by Viking and shows the face and pyramids together. The second image shows one small one large pyramid together (but not a clear one). THe one you left on the page, is the clear top view of the pyramid but the small pyramid is barely visible on this one. The last one was taken by mars global orbiter and was added to show that the area today looks the same as in the days Viking was wandering around. --] | |||
| Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --] (]) 13:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:24 hours|a period of '''24 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:Egyptian pyramids| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. {{</nowiki>unblock|''My addition to Egyption Pyramids was: | |||
| "It should also be noted that, there is no any clear, vivid, unquestionable proof in any manner whatsoever that, these pyramids or their surrounding complex were designed and/or built by human beings. The Ra Material (one of the contributors was Don Elkins) has detailed alternative explanations on why and how those pyramids were designed and built by whom." | |||
| I see no any unreferenced and/or irrelevant material above. I asked ohnoitsjamie the reason of deletion. But there was no reply. | |||
| I think the judgement of me being in a edit warring is not fair. On the other hand, this issue seems in need of the intervention of an administrator who can exempt himself/herself from his/her personal feelings on the subject, as it seems there is misuse of administrative tools. --Lyckey | |||
| Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Lyckey"''<nowiki>}} Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:true|] (]) 22:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|My addition to ] was: | |||
| "It should also be noted that, there is no any clear, vivid, unquestionable proof in any manner whatsoever that, these pyramids or their surrounding complex were designed and/or built by human beings. The Ra Material (one of the contributors was Don Elkins) has detailed alternative explanations on why and how those pyramids were designed and built by whom." | |||
| I see no any unreferenced and/or irrelevant material above. I asked ohnoitsjamie the reason of deletion. But there was no reply. | |||
| I think the judgement of me being in a edit warring is not fair. On the other hand, this issue seems in need of the intervention of an administrator who can exempt himself/herself from his/her personal feelings on the subject, as it seems there is misuse of administrative tools. --] | decline=Please familiarize yourself with Misplaced Pages's ]; it exists to prevent the repetitive editing without talk page discussion that you engaged in. Your block had nothing to do with the content. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 01:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC) }} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed| I didn't revert anybody's edit, I just added below text to the article: | |||
| "It should also be noted that, there is no any clear, vivid, unquestionable proof in any manner whatsoever that, these pyramids or their surrounding complex were designed and/or built by human beings. The Ra Material (one of the contributors was Don Elkins) has detailed alternative explanations on why and how those pyramids were designed and built by whom." | |||
| I accept that I repeatedly tried to revert the edits of some users who insist on the irrelevance of inclusion links to an ufologist and the material he published. However, after being warned that I could be blocked, I stopped further trials and just added the above text into the article. So where is the edit warring? | |||
| |decline=First, you were . Then, after that, there's , , then . That's edit warring to me and that's ] enough to justify a block in any event, especially considering you were warned. -- ] (]) 02:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC) }} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1= I believe we should look at some part of the definition of edit warring first: "..at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Edit warring is a behavior, not a simple measure of the number of reverts on a single page in a specific period of time." Again, I accept that I repeatedly tried to revert the edits of Gene_Poole who insisted on the irrelevance of inclusion of links to an ufologist and the material he published. However, after being warned that I could be blocked, I stopped further trials and just added another point of view into the article. The links provided by ] aiming to explain where edit warring is, belong to different parts of the story. The proof for this is that] edited the captions of the images I had uploaded instead of blocking me. |decline=I'm not going to unblock, because I think your editing pattern was ]. In future, I suggest you find ] to support content you want to include, and establish ] on the talk page before adding the content. ] (]) 13:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1= I believe we should look at some part of the definition of edit warring first: "..at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Edit warring is a behavior, not a simple measure of the number of reverts on a single page in a specific period of time." Again, I accept that I repeatedly tried to revert the edits of Gene_Poole who insisted on the irrelevance of inclusion of links to an ufologist and the material he published. However, after being warned that I could be blocked, I stopped further trials and just added another point of view into the article. The links provided by ] aiming to explain where edit warring is, belong to different parts of the story. The proof for this is that] edited the captions of the images I had uploaded instead of blocking me. |decline=reason — It seems clear that after your warning you then continued to revert the images by adding them back in repeatedly. Just allow your brief time to expire and come back with a better understanding. ]<sub>]</sub> 11:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Citations == | |||
| Please read ] and make your references in line with the guidelines there. Otherwise someone else has to come along and fix them. Thanks. ] (]) 19:17, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == D&M Pyramid == | |||
| Hi again. Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough - the references I removed don't point to pages that reference the D&M Pyramid, at least not by name. That's why I removed them (actually, I commented them out; they're still there). Anyway, maybe you were referring to a subpage from the links. Can you maybe point the references to there instead? Cheers, --] 19:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. You're right in that two of the three references do not mention D&M pyramid by name. However, first one (the one currently being number 7) does so on the picture. The other two shows the images of the Cydonia taken by different spacecraft, without mentioning D&M pyramid by name. If they have to, as per some wikipedia rule, I don't have any objection to that--] (]) 19:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Ra (channeled entity)== | |||
| ]I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 19:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this barnstar for your work on the ] page! ] (]) 09:26, 20 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :very kind of you :).. this star is deserved by hans adler and dougweller more than me though.. ] (]) 01:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::No problem. You may want to have a look at the ] . . . it was under attack a short time ago for the same reasons as this article. It was revamped to add a criticism section to satisfy the skeptics and many sources were added. Good luck. ] (]) 12:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::well, thanks again.. I did have a look at the seth material several times and had been checking the heated discussions. However, I'm not so much into the other channellings and spiritual stuff other than the law of one series. I do not follow Carla Rueckert's other channelings also. In the past, I red plenty of stuff and after ra material, I believed there would not be any other "higher" information available for long time. I do also think that some/most spiritual stuff have negative influences. That's my point of view. In addition to that, I need to limit my time for wikipedia. Good luck to you anyway. ] (]) 15:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes, I agree, I just meant that following the same overall format and approach may fend off the attackers a bit . . . it seemed to work with the other article at any rate. Cheers. ] (]) 16:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::That's right; seth material seems as presenting good "know-how" and "how-to"s to satisfy criterias. However it seems anybody can claim anything (true or false) regarding the quality of the article from policies and guidelines perspective, without any penalty in case of false arguments. That is, the same format may not work for any other article. ] (]) 21:00, 21 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == _Ra_ and others. == | |||
| Hi Logos5557 ! | |||
| GOOD JOB. And THANKS for your determination !! B-) | |||
| It's about time those other Wiki people get less "constipated" ! ! B-) | |||
| Keep up the good work(s). . . | |||
| Blue skies. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == An AfD you will be interested in == | |||
| See ]. ] (]) 19:51, 14 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == POV in Ra == | |||
| The word "band" is equally meaningless to the uninitiated and needs just as much or more explanation. Ra used the word density for a reason, because density was the most suitable word. When you change the words based on your personal opinion of what is understandable, you are inserting your own opinion and your own understanding about what the word means. This is a ] issue. Instead of using arbitrary words that you personally selected for your own aesthetic reasons, we should use the words that are actually used by the source. Is Misplaced Pages a place for your own interpretation, or is it a place for neutral exposition of the cold facts? Would we change a word in some scientific field based on the personal taste of an editor? Would we refer to atoms as "slices" just because one editor thinks slices are closer to the concept that the scientists are actually trying to get to? The word "density" itself is shrouded in such mystery that for any one person to replace it with an arbitrary, unprecedented word, is the height of arrogance. If Ra meant "band" why didn't it say "band"? ] (]) 04:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :This is not a ] issue. If you find a better word instead of band, not density of course, for the lead you can insert it. We don't have to use the actual/original words used by the source. If "slice" reflect some other aspect of the atom better, then go for it, use it together with other original words. Because you are simply trying to make it better understandable, you are not trying to alter the original definition or explanation completely but simply trying to enrich it. I'm sorry but you simply are making this Ra channeling and the communications received into a holy religion. You seem to be inclined to accept every single word said without any judgement, like a fundamentalist. | |||
| :This sentence is simply your own personal point of view and can't be counted as neutral: "The word "density" itself is shrouded in such mystery that for any one person to replace it with an arbitrary, unprecendented word, is the height of arrogance." Remember that, Ra was making mistakes in some dates. What does it tell or ring to you that Ra can also make mistakes? Regarding density; as I mentioned several times before, the main body of the article does use the original word density, for the concept Ra used it for. However, for the lead, there is no need to stick to the original words, as we can use synonyms instead, if the original is problematic. If you read through the archives and previous deletion discussions, you will see that "density" was one of the most problematic words of the article. An editor took it as a pseudoscientific jargon. Will you always be around and "protect" the article against such attacks or just try to "push" your own interpretation (your own point of view) about the word "density" one time and vanish afterwards? Ask Ra why didn't it say "band"? And please stop inserting "density" in the lead instead of band. ] (]) 07:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Changing the word from "Density" to "Band" is a significant interpretative leap. This is where the POV issue comes into play. Density is incomprehensible, I agree, but changing it to a comprehensible word changes the original work and misrepresents it (distorts it) in the direction of your particular interpretation. If a certain work is incomprehensible, the incomprehensibility should be documented. The work should not be altered to be comprehensible. Cover the incomprehensibility, don't interpolate. Interpolation cannot possible be a ]. Why not put the word "density" in quotes and make a section that discusses the incomprehensibility of the word? That would be the honest approach. It seems you are reluctant to let the public edit this page, and you want to sit on it like a mother hen and protect it. This is unfortunate, since wikipedia is supposed to represent collective wisdom one man's best guess modification. You say I'm turning this into a Holy Religion, what makes Ra different from any other religion? In a wikipedia page covering the Bible one would not arbitrarily introduce new words to replace words that some people find incomprehensible. ] (]) 08:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::None of your arguments are valid. Misplaced Pages articles should be wirtten in a way as there remain no incomprehensibility or whatsoever. Aside from that, I don't agree with you on your interpretations regarding the word density and the Ra channeling. You are expecting the "whole world" to accept your interpretation without any question. On the other hand, I am trying to play with the rules of the playground, which is wikipedia. Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines say that, there is no need to stick to the original words and concepts and any jargon needs to be explained. For this reason, it is the most appropriate thing to leave the word "density" to the main body of the article and not use it in the lead, in order to save the necessity to explain it. Misplaced Pages is not democracy, wikipedia aims to represent collective notable knowledge (not collective wisdom), but not the "wisdom" of a spoilt child, who insists on without seeking for any consensus. Your very first argument that "band" was not used a single time in any of the books, so is completely unsuitable to be used in the article, conflicts with wikipedia policies and guidelines. I'm indeed reluctant to let any fundamentalist, who sees Ra channeling as a kind of religion, to edit the article about Ra. If you have a better idea, better word instead of "band" (not density, of course) to use in the lead, then you're welcome. Otherwise, I will simply revert your insertions of "density", which you make without seeking any consensus. ] (]) 08:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==peacock== | |||
| i suggets you read ]. Your wordy display of your own knowledge is inappropriate for wiki ] (]) 02:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| ==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. {{#if:|] (]) 19:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the is 12 hours. ] (]) 19:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)</div> | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 09:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Copyright problems with ]== | |||
| ]Hello. Concerning your contribution, ], please note that Misplaced Pages cannot accept ] text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). {{#if: http://www.llresearch.org/library/the_law_of_one_pdf/the_law_of_one_book_1.pdf | This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.llresearch.org/library/the_law_of_one_pdf/the_law_of_one_book_1.pdf.}} As a copyright violation, ] appears to qualify for ] under the ]. ] has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. | |||
| If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the '']'' (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following: | |||
| :*If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at {{Talk|File:Headarrangement.jpg}} and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". '''See ] for instructions.''' | |||
| :*If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the ] (GFDL) and ], under ], or released into the public domain'' leave a note at {{Talk|File:Headarrangement.jpg}} with a link to where we can find that note. | |||
| :*If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org ''or'' a postal message to the permitting re-use ''under the ] and ]'', and note that you have done so on {{Talk|File:Headarrangement.jpg}}. | |||
| However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our ]. Misplaced Pages takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators '''will''' be ] from editing. Thank you. <!-- Inserted via Template:Nothanks-sd --> ]<sup>]</sup> 17:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 22:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Non-free images in userspace== | |||
| Please note that it is Misplaced Pages policy that non-free images cannot be used outside articles - see ]. Therefore, I have removed the non-free images from your user page and the article you are building in userspace. Please do not re-insert them. <b>]</b> 09:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| * Please note that if you continue to re-insert non-free images into pages in userspace then you will be blocked from editing. The two images that were removed from ] are both non-free images. <b>]</b> 11:17, 25 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :you can just remove the image, not the image box completely. you can only delete non-free images which are not associated with any mainspace article. if you are not qualified to delete an image from wikipedia, ask an admin to do it for you. ] (]) 11:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :: I have worked mostly with images in the two years I've been an admin. You'll find you can delete any image, regardless of whether it is associated with an article, if it fails our media policies. In the case of userspace non-free images, I usually do delete the images, but in this case, since the article was at MfD, I wished only to remove their current presence. The neatest way of doing this was to remove the image box, after all it is redundant without the image. <b>]</b> 11:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:13, 15 February 2023
| This is Logos's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Research assistance
I have been given access to a number of sources via WP:The Misplaced Pages Library and also have a decent set of research resources. If you would like assistance in accessing a particular source you can leave me a message on my talk page and I will do my best. I offer this assistance for both verification and research. I may not have access to any particular source but will give it a shot. I am open to requests on all sides of issues, being strongly committed to NPOV and desiring above all to improve the encyclopedia. Providing some material will require email correspondence. I would make clear that my privacy should be maintained (non disclosure of my email, personal information etc.) and that if I provide you with copyrighted material it is as fair use for research purposes under the terms and conditions my access and that it may not be reproduced or distributed in any way. Best. - - MrBill3 (talk) 12:39, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
FYI
A sockpuppet investigation has been filed at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Logos Edward321 (talk) 23:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines
"The purpose of a Misplaced Pages talk page (accessible via the talk or discussion tab) is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page." Your recent post on the Atlantis talk page had nothing to do with that. Edward321 (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- No; my post on the atlantis talk page had/has a lot to do with improving the article. Ancient scrolls written in ancient greek may have some references to a lost continent. You should wait until all the scrolls deciphered.
- In order for a material to fall under the clause 4 of WP:NOT#FORUM, its "unsuitableness" should be very obvious (like some of the past posts). Otherwise, removing a material whose unsuitableness is ambiguous would be exploiting a "guideline" as if it had a power of a "policy". You should remember that guidelines are "sets of best practices that are supported by consensus". While "editors should attempt to follow guidelines", "they are best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply". That is, while editors "should follow" policies, they should at best "attempt to follow" guidelines. Logos (talk) 23:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
bender235 socking
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/bender235 I opened this up. Edward/Bender continues to troll the Atlantis page, its obvious from their edits and behavior Edward and bender are the same person. AppleJuiceLover (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Logos/park/lo1
User:Logos/park/lo1, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Logos/park/lo1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Logos/park/lo1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. jps (talk) 08:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Donquixote.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Donquixote.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Logos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
the law of one
I think it is time to try and reinstate the law of one wikipedia article. I will help--Namaste@ 15:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Fixed your talk page archiving
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)