Revision as of 02:45, 5 July 2009 editSimon Dodd (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,592 edits →Note← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:01, 30 October 2024 edit undoDreamRimmer bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Extended confirmed users17,203 editsm Fix mass message error per WP:AWBREQTag: paws [2.2] | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:Rjanag/Archivenav}} | {{User:Rjanag/Archivenav}} | ||
<center>Click <span class="plainlinks"></span> to leave me a message saying I'm great, or <span class="plainlinks"></span> to leave me a message saying I'm terrible.<br/>'''Click <span class="plainlinks"></span> to leave me any other kind of message.<br/>Please sign your message by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> after it.'''</center> | |||
<center>Click <span class="plainlinks"></span> to leave me a message saying I'm great, or <span class="plainlinks"></span> to leave me a message saying I'm terrible.<br/>'''Click <span class="plainlinks"></span> to leave me any other kind of message.<br/>Please sign your message by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> after it.'''</center> | |||
==Ashley92995== | |||
Sorry that i didn't respond to your messages for a while. I'm having a hard time editing the references the right way, I don't know how to set them up right. I don't want to ruin the page or make it a bad article but the fact that I can't fix the citations right is negatively effecting the page. So if could, could you try to help me fix the references or show me how to because I'm very confused on how to do them correctly. Sorry for any trouble that I have caused you or the articles page. - Ashley92995 | |||
<inputbox> | |||
Thanks for the example on how to create a good reference, I think I understand how to do it now, I just edited and corrected all of the refs in Albas Charites and Politics section in the her personal life section, so if you could review it and tell me if I did it right it would be helpful. | |||
bgcolor= | |||
type=fulltext | |||
prefix=User talk:Rjanag/Archive | |||
/Archive | |||
break=yes | |||
width=60 | |||
searchbuttonlabel=Search archives | |||
</inputbox> | |||
== Query == | |||
What if i revert my edits that I've recently done to Alba's careen section, could you leave other edits, because I agree a majority of my edits aren't to very important to the article (adding non-major things), but some are, so If I remove things that are unnessisary on my own, and you review the page after I'm done and like it can you leave my other of my edits alone, or you can tell me what you don't like and I'll remove it. | |||
"A 2012 analysis of data on individual participants in acupuncture studies looked at migraine and tension headaches. The analysis showed that actual acupuncture was more effective than either no acupuncture or simulated acupuncture in reducing headache frequency or severity." See ]. This is a cut and paste from the source. | |||
Im going to re-edit and undue a majority of my edits, If you like the way the page is when I'm done could you not un-due my other edits. | |||
"A 2014 Australian clinical study involving 282 men and women showed that needle and laser acupuncture were modestly better at relieving knee pain from osteoarthritis than no treatment, but not better than simulated (sham) laser acupuncture." This is a cut and paste from the source. See ]. | |||
::I just edited, and finished the article. I compared the article before I edited it and after I finished editing it and It does look the same, thou some notable differences are that I added a qoute box in Public Image section, minor edits to Early Life, and relationships, a photo to Career Section, added a Other Awards Chart to Awards section, added The Killer Inside Me, and Valentines Day to career section, and added the the shark incident, and her offer to act free for the aids foundation to the Charity's section. | |||
According to NCCAM, "results of a systematic review that combined data from 11 clinical trials with more than 1,200 participants suggested that acupuncture (and acupuncture point stimulation) may help with certain symptoms associated with cancer treatments." This is a cut and paste from the article. See ]. | |||
:::Also, thanks for being understanding, and for helping me. - Ashley92995 | |||
Is it a weight violation to use an that is not a review when there are way better references already in the article or is it ? The TCM page is a different situation when there are not plenty of sources for the drug research section on pseudoscience. ] (]) 02:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Re: == | |||
:It's not really clear to me what you're asking, and since you aren't using quotation marks or italics or anything else in this message it's not even clear to me what parts of your message are your comments and what are pasted from articles. Also keep in mind that I'm not familiar with these articles, I only just stumbled across them recently, so I don't have much context for the issues you're raising. If you have a question for me please present it a little more clearly so I don't have to spend time deciphering it. Thanks, <b class="IPA">]</b> (]) 03:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
The refs look fine. I couldn't find any obvious errors, everything looks ready. --<span style="border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;">]</span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"> | <small>—] ] ]</small></span> 05:40, 28 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Would we be able to find a CC or GFDL image, or request permission for one, to improve the article? There are a number of places to search, such as flickr, where amateurs may have photographed people in public. --<span style="border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;">]</span> | <small>—] ] ]</small> 07:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I searched flickr for a while and found nothing free; for some people I searched (like Stephen Chow) there were nice non-free images that I could request permission for, but for Zhang Yuqi I don't remember (most of it was just images people copied from somewhere on the internet). Not surprisingly, we are short on pictures for most Asian celebrities, since most en-wiki users aren't from there...even pretty huge ones like ] and ] are missing photos! <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 11:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::I got some permission, and have an image up now (and a couple new photos of Stephen Chow came free with the package!). <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 05:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I edited my previous comment and added the source to make it more clear. You brought up the issue of plag on my talk page with a related article. The text in the quotes are a cut and paste but with the acupuncture article the text is not in quotation marks. Let's start with one question. Is that ]? ] (]) 06:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Modified your block == | |||
:::Let me stop you right there. There is no rule saying that if there is other plagiarism (or any other sort of problem) in one article, then it's OK for you to add more. There is no rule saying that if I report one instance of plagiarism (or any other sort of problem) then I have to read the entire article and report every other one. I happened to glance at just that one sentence of the article and its source (that is literally the only source in the article that I opened up and read) and saw that it was obviously plagiarized, so I dealt with it and alerted you to the issue. I am under no obligation to devote myself to scanning the entire article for it, so I'm not sure what you're trying to get at here. If you legitimately don't understand what plagiarism is then I can try to explain it more, but if you're trying to suggest that my notification to you was somehow "wrong" because there are other instances of plagiarism that I didn't report, then you are wasting your time. <b class="IPA">]</b> (]) 13:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Hi, just a note to let you know I modified your block of {{user5|Fhue}} to indefinite. I'm not questioning your block, but there's a pretty big ] issue that it took me a moment to perceive. ] <small>(])</small> 13:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:IMO, a username block seems somewhat harsh. I'm aware of what you are concerned about, but I am unconvinced whether a straight up block was the right idea, especially since the user has been communicative? \ ] / {]} 13:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Indef is fine with me—assuming that "indef" means "until he changes his name", not "forever". The user, while being a bit of a ], looks like he's starting to be ready to work cooperatively and follow guidelines, and could be a constructive user, so once the username is changed I think he should be allowed to edit again. Also his argument about the talk page guidelines and stuff made me aware that the guideline page really doesn't say anything about how we shouldn't edit archives (I'm going to suggest an addition this afternoon when I have some free time), so in a way he has already done something constructive. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 18:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Agreed. ] <small>(])</small> 00:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Nature editorial "Hard to swallow" at ] == | |||
== Question about DYK hook length == | |||
Greetings Rjanag! I've opened a discussion at ] about the use of the Nature editorial. I've concluded my opinion into four points. Would you care to take a look? | |||
Hi, I have a question for you regarding DYK hook. The required hook length should not be over 200 characters, but does it include "*...that" or "(pictured)?" ?--] 23:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Technically, I think usually "that" and the question mark are counted, "..." is not, and "(pictured)" is debateable; I usually count it because it's a pain to leave it out of the count, but if a hook is borderline I might leave it out, or if there is extra text inside the parentheses (for example, ''(flag of Kazakhstan pictured)'' ) then I'll count the extra. Also, you count the characters in the actual text, not the wiki-text in the edit window (so you don't count formatting like <code>'''<nowiki>]'''</code>). The easiest way to count is to paste the hook into counter. | |||
:<s>I'm not sure which hook you're looking at, but as far as I can tell the {{T:TDYK|Zhang Yuqi|Zhang Yuqi}} hook is 142 characters (including (pictured)) and the {{T:TDYK|Psycho Donuts|Psycho Donuts}} one is around 160.</s> Oops, I just realized you're not necessarily asking about one of my hooks. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 23:58, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Rjanag's mostly right, but I'd say ] is the easiest way to calculate hook length. :P ] (]) 00:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Oh, thanks Rjanag for the detailed reply. I reviewed ], and if I exclude "(pictured) and "...that" from the alternative hook suggested by the nominator, the hook characters are counted as "195", if not, it has 214 characters, so I needed a correct rule on hook. Shubinator, you have a very good tool for that!-] 00:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
What's substantially different from the usage of the source at ], is that when the context of the quote is restored, the whole source is solely about TCM, not about acupuncture. A mere "''TCM as mainly pseudoscience, with no logical mechanism of action for the majority of its treatments.''" alone is undue weight, but if we include the rest of the paragraph in the article, it'd say: "''Advocates respond by claiming that researchers are missing aspects of the art, notably'' '''the interactions between different ingredients in traditional therapies.'''". IMHO, it clearly doesn't fit to ]. | |||
==Auto archiving== | |||
Hey Rjanag, I thought you may be interested in this: | |||
I have suggested removing the unfit entries, and finding for better sources. Administrator Kww, however, replied to me that: "'' I would like to suggest that the next time you want to misrepresent the contents of a source, you should refrain from doing so.''". I'd appreciate if you could have a look. Cheers! ] (]) 14:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
<code><nowiki>{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|maxarchivesize = 125K | |||
:No thanks, I do not wish to continue in the discussions within this topic area. It's like herding cats. <b class="IPA">]</b> (]) 22:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
|counter = 6 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
::Well, I understand you perfectly. Thanks anyway! :-) ] (]) 18:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
|minthreadstoarchive = 0 | |||
|algo = old(48h) | |||
== Precious anniversary == | |||
|archive = User talk:Rjanag/Archive%(counter)d | |||
<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 ); border-radius: 1em; border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix"> | |||
<div> | |||
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; background-color: #ddd; border: 5px solid #ddd; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); border-radius: 0.5em;">]</div> | |||
'''support for ease and transparency'''<br /> | |||
Thank you for your (seemingly) tireless effort to make the DYK process easy to understand, user-friendly and transparent to follow, willing to try suggestions and drop them if not wanted. Thank you also for patiently explaining again and again, - you are an ]! | |||
--] (]) 06:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
</div></div> | |||
Three years, you were the 72nd recipient of my ], --] (]) 09:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Eight years ago, you were recipient no. ] of Precious, a prize of QAI! --] (]) 06:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Request for input == | |||
I see you have had previous involvement with the editor Hijiri88. I would welcome any input you might see fit to offer at ]. Thank you. ] (]) 18:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation == | |||
{| style="margin:0px; font-family:Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica" width="90%" | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:15px 15px 15px 15px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">I'd like to invite you to join the ]. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards ] (]) 22:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)</div> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== AfD input == | |||
Hi, Rjanag. Way back in 2009, ] for ], and voted to delete it. The article was deleted, but was subsequently recreated. The new article did not address any of the concerns whatsoever and is in the same bad state it was in before. Thusly, I have ], and would very much appreciate it if you gave your input. It has passed the initial 7 day period and has been relisted again at AfD to establish a clearer consensus, so I'm now reaching out to you. There has thusfar only been one other vote, and that is for deletion. Thanks, ] (]) 18:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi,<br> | |||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 --> | |||
==File permission problem with File:JephJacques.JPG== | |||
] | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. | |||
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either | |||
* make a note permitting reuse under the ] or another acceptable free license (see ]) '''at the site of the original publication'''; or | |||
* Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to '''permissions-en@wikimedia.org''', stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter ]. If you take this step, add {{tl|OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. | |||
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to '''permissions-en@wikimedia.org'''. | |||
If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tl|non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at ], and add a ] justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. | |||
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in . '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. You may wish to read Misplaced Pages's ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 07:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
== T:DYK/NN listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''T:DYK/NN'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] <big style="position:relative;top:5px">(])</big> 22:01, 6 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Extended confirmed protection == | |||
{{ivmbox|1=Hello, Rjanag. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. | |||
] (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned ] was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following ] with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. | |||
In July and August 2016, ] established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions: | |||
* '''Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective'''. It should not be used as a first resort. | |||
* '''A bot will post a notification at ] of each use'''. MusikBot currently does this by updating ], which is transcluded onto the noticeboard. | |||
Please review ] carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. <br><small>This message was sent to the administrators' ]. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |2=Padlock-blue.svg}} | |||
<!--Message sent following discussion at WT:PP--> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=737471142 --> | |||
== Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins == | |||
Hello, | |||
Please note that ] based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your ] in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the ] for additional information. '''Important''': Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the ]. ] (]) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mike V@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mike_V/All_admins&oldid=749162175 --> | |||
== A new user right for New Page Patrollers == | |||
Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}. | |||
A new user group, ], has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at ]. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. | |||
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available ] but very often a friendly custom message works best. | |||
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at ]. <small>''(Sent to all admins)''</small>.] (]) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=748418714 --> | |||
== ]: Voting now open! == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Rjanag. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/31&oldid=750614956 --> | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Questionable content 1158-4.JPG== | |||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Administrators' newsletter - February 2017 == | |||
] from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please ]. Your ] is welcomed. | |||
] '''Administrator changes''' | |||
:] ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] | |||
:] ] • ] • ] | |||
] '''Guideline and policy news''' | |||
:*A ] to workshop proposals to amend the ] at ] has been in process since late December 2016. | |||
:*] closed with no consensus for implementing ] with new criteria for use. | |||
:*Following ], an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators. | |||
] '''Technical news''' | |||
:*When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (]) | |||
:*Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an ] closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (]) | |||
:* The Foundation has ] a new ] to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017. | |||
] '''Arbitration''' | |||
:*The Arbitration Committee released ] to the Wikimedia Foundation's ]. | |||
] '''Obituaries''' | |||
:* ] (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009. | |||
---- | |||
{{center|] • ] • ]}} | |||
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/First_issue&oldid=763126991 --> | |||
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Mergesomewhere == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 06:13, 17 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
== jhosse y su grupo lora == | |||
i was working on the jhosse y su grupo lora page. i takes time translating since he's a "latin artist". this was also a project in which i needed help from the latin music group ] (]) 04:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
:If you need time, you can work on the page in a personal sandbox (e.g., ]) and then once it's ready you can ] to a real article. | |||
:You will need to make sure, though, that your page meets Misplaced Pages's content criteria, particularly regarding ]. If the page doesn't meet these criteria, it is likely that it will be deleted again. <b class="IPA">]</b> (]) 04:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Rjanag. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=813407029 --> | |||
== You are so great == | |||
You are a great guy! Thanks for being so excellent. <small>''Wow, I was stopping by to thank you for making my first solo effort at ] so much easier, and now you've even found a way to make ''thanking'' you easier! A remarkable Wikipedian!''</small> ] (]) 03:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Misplaced Pages Deletion == | |||
00:35, 12 September 2009 Rjanag (talk | contribs) deleted page Pet Protection Agreement (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: nearly word-for-word) | |||
It has come to my knowledge that you have flagged my article page for Pet Protection Agreement. This Agreement was created and authored by myself, Rachel Hirschfeld. I am the owner of www.pettrustattorney.com, www.petprotectionagreement.com, and authored two books on pet trusts. I am the nations leading lawyer on this subject of pet trusts. I founded the Animal Law Committee at the New York County Bar Association and presently Co-Chair. I also teach pet trusts at New York University. Please undelete the article page for Pet Protection Agreement. | |||
Rachel Hirschfeld <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:54, 10 March 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Chinese word "weiji" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Chinese word "weiji"'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> –] (]]) 18:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Tian'anmen West Statioonn listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Tian'anmen West Statioonn'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 08:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Xinjiang conflict == | |||
Hey, I noticed the Ürümqi barnstar you made, and since that page is easily the best Uyghur-related article on here, I thought I might as well mention that there's an ] on the ] page if that sounds interesting. ─ ] « ] · ] » 19:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Rjanag. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/09&oldid=866998319 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2019 special circular == | |||
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> | |||
{| | |||
|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| ] | |||
|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators ] secure their accounts'''</span> | |||
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. | |||
* Use strong, unique passwords for your Misplaced Pages account and associated email | |||
* ] if your Misplaced Pages account password or email password is reused on another website, , or weak | |||
* ] for improved security | |||
|} | |||
<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button 2|1=View additional information|link=no}}</span> | |||
</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> | |||
<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;"> | |||
{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;" | |||
|{{null}} | |||
; Why have I received this message? | |||
: All administrators are receiving it. | |||
; What prompted you to send this message? | |||
: Recently, several Misplaced Pages admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were ]. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh ] after losing control of their account. | |||
; What do I need to do? | |||
: Only to follow the instructions in this message. | |||
:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). | |||
:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). | |||
:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. | |||
; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? | |||
: You can find out more about 2FA at ]. | |||
|}</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a ]. Thank you for your attention. For the ], ] 02:50, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) == | |||
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. | |||
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are ] to "have strong passwords and ]." We have ] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, ] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. | |||
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, -] 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
== Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
] | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
] | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
] | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:14, 1 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ''''']'''''<sup>]</sup> 23:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:HoboNews.jpg== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
== CfD nomination of ] == | |||
] | |||
''']''' has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the ''']''' on the ] page.<!--Template:Cfdnotice2--> —] (]) 21:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for merging of ] == | |||
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> –] (]]) 02:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for merging of ] == | |||
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 18:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
== "Misplaced Pages:NLIST" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> — <samp>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></samp> \\ 17:23, 4 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
{{User QAIbox | |||
| title = Awesome | |||
| image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| bold = ] | |||
}} | }} | ||
--] (]) 07:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
</nowiki> | |||
</code> | |||
</br> | |||
Just add it to the top of your page and it'll save much time. :) \ ] / {]} 06:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
... and ]! --] (]) 09:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
:Heh, thanks. I've thought about doing this, but I also kind of like having control...specifically, it allows me to avoid archiving threads that I haven't dealt with yet or have been procrastinating about (for example, the Ashley thread at the top of this page has been sitting there for a week or two waiting for me to do something about it). <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 06:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Jason Lau == | ||
Thank you for reviewing the 3RR complaint. I trust I can come to you if edit warring continues. ] (]) 06:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hi, I read your first nomination to delete ] and I couldn’t understand how it wasn’t deleted so I’ve nominated him again, please vote and join the discussion. Thanks ] (]) 19:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
As to "Since the reverting has stopped, I see no reason to block anyone"- The reverting stopped because I didn't want to break the 3rr rule. Apparently that was error, because you now tell us, in effect, that 3rr is merely advisory: it won't be enforced if it would "prevent from participating in the discussion." The practical effect, whether you think you're endorsing it or not, is that the version preferred by an editor who broke the rules trumps objections to it made by those who make a good faith effort to stay within the rules. What is the process to appeal your call? <font face="palatino linotype" color="#000000">- Simon Dodd</font> <small>{ ]·]·]·] }</small> 16:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I've raised this at AN: <font face="palatino linotype" color="#000000">- Simon Dodd</font> <small>{ ]·]·]·] }</small> 17:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Enhancing Chopsticks == | ||
Hey, you contributed significantly to ]. I thought I would check with you. I think the article can use a holistic revision. I on the talk page. It would be great to have your feedback before or while the revision takes place. ] (]) 20:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
] | |||
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. | |||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 16:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Precious anniversary == | |||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Nine}} --] (]) 08:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 08:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 08:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 21:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 21:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for merger of ] == | |||
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 22:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
== You have been removed from ] due to inactivity == | |||
'''Hi Rjanag!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at ], but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 6 months. | |||
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting ]. | |||
'''Thank you!''' | |||
Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 18:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ]<sup>]</sup> 13:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Always precious == | |||
] | |||
Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always - miss you --] (]) 08:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
== June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive == | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2022 Backlog Drive</span> | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
* On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. | |||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. | |||
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''! | |||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.<br> ] to opt out of any future messages. | |||
|] | |||
|On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <sub>(])</sub> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
|} ] (]) 09:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 14:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
(] · ]) ''']''' 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Excuse me == | |||
|} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/Mailing_list&oldid=1090143622 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
But is Jimmy Wales the fouder of Misplaced Pages?]|<small>]]</small> 18:30, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
== Thank you == | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
That is what I have been trying to tell him, but he keeps accusing me trolling.]|<small>]]</small> 18:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
He just did the same thing to your comment.]|<small>]]</small> 18:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
:I don't really care what he does on his own talk page. Just ignore it. The issue here is the article, not his talk page. What you need to do is start a section of the talk page explaining why you disagree with his edit; continuing to revert at the article is useless. Once that talk page discussion is started, both of you should be going there rather than reverting; if people continue reverting instead of discussing, either or both of you could be blocked. I have no reason to block the other user, th ough, if you haven't started a discussion at the talk page. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 18:41, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
I was just about to say that I now see his point.]|<small>]]</small> 18:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1124425182 --> | |||
== Request Edit Assistance Pinduoduo == | |||
:Ok. In the future, please don't ] other editors in a dispute like you did here. If you are having a content dispute at some article, go to one of the appropriate pages (], ], a WikiProject, etc.) to report the problem, don't just leave a message with some random editor. I have not been involved in editing the ] page and I have no idea why you chose to message me; when you left your first message I didn't even know what you were talking about. If you are going to seek input from other editors, you need to at least explain what the problem is. Please keep these things in mind in the future. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 18:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Ok, again I'm really sorry.]|<small>]]</small> 18:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hi. I see you’re a member of the WikiProject China - I’ve made some proposals to update the article about ], posted here ].I have a conflict of interest and can’t do the edits myself. Would you have time to look at these and weigh in? Gratitude. ] (]) 20:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
==Consensus== | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
If there is consensus to include something, but not consensus on how it ought to be included, there ''isn't'' consensus on its inclusion. Let me put the question in more functional terms: in what circumstances, or after what period of time, will I not incur a 3RR or "edit warring" block for reinserting the quote? | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 27#Misplaced Pages:PUFFERY}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
Just saying "when there's consensus" isn't an answer. Without some quantification of what constitutes sufficient consensus, your claim that I am "free to put the quote back in if that is what the consensus becomes" starts to look like the Obama rhetorical strategy of saying you're for doing X in principle, but then setting up so many caveats and obstacles to doing X that doing X is, in practical terms, impossible. You suggest getting additional opinions, but (mindfull of ]) I have used the 3d opinion process several times before, and it is a crapshoot whether one gets from it little input or no input at all. Weeks can go by before we get additional input. | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Happy First Edit Day! == | |||
And even if/when additional input that supports inclusion is forthcoming, you still leave me in an untenable situation. What is the threshold is for having achieved "consensus"? Without knowing where the line is, no matter how many more users endorse my position, I still can't risk putting the material back, lest you block me, citing your decision about Garcia's 3RR violation. The practical upshot is not that "e gets 'the last word' for a day or so while we discuss things at the talk page," but rather, that "e gets 'the last word'" for the indefinite future, unless someone else, by sheer chance or by my (]) request, inserts the same quote. | |||
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
{{ombox | |||
| name = First Edit Day | |||
| image = ] | |||
| imageright = ] | |||
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%); | |||
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| plainlinks = yes | |||
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Rjanag! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 10:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 25#Misplaced Pages:PUFFERY}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 02:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
{{ombox | |||
| name = First Edit Day | |||
| image = ] | |||
| imageright = ] | |||
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(60deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite); | |||
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| plainlinks = yes | |||
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Rjanag! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 05:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 22:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
It doesn't stop there, either. It isn't clear how broadly your warning sweeps: am I on notice for any reverts (or anything that can be so characterized) at ], or just for the sections at issue in yesterday's controversy? By imposing this amorphous standard that maximizes your discretion, you have effectively issued me a topic ban on ] for having the temerity to report someone for breaking the rules and lacking the courtesy to violate them myself. | |||
Hello, | |||
Lastly, it is grossly inappropriate that this issue is being brushed under the rug at a talk page. It amounts to an allegation of administrator misconduct, and whether I'm in the wrong or you are, this is an issue that ought to be aired at AN or one of its sub-boards. Since talk pages are not private fora, I am therefore ] copying your comment and my response to a subsection of the AN debate.<font face="palatino linotype" color="#000000">- Simon Dodd</font> <small>{ ]·]·]·] }</small> 21:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
:You originally posted at AN saying you just wanted a third opinion on the AN3, which is what you got. If you are wanting to accuse me of administrator misconduct, you are welcome to do so, start a new thread somewhere, be my guest. You can even insist that I be desysopped if you like. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 21:57, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:: Your desire to suspend a sword of damocles over my head and then duck questions about the propriety of that decision or under what circumstances I can avoid it being dropped on me is hardly a good reason to allow you to sweep the question under the rug. Quite the contrary. The more arbitrary and discretion-conferring an administrative action, the stronger the need for it to be broadly reviewed. What's more, your self-evident displeasure at being asked to justify and delineate the application of your decision (for example, telling me to "go fuck self") strengthens the case yet further, since a reasonable observer might think future actions you take against me motivated by spite if these concerns are not resolved ex ante. <font face="palatino linotype" color="#000000">- Simon Dodd</font> <small>{ ]·]·]·] }</small> 22:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::I won't be taking future actions against you; admins don't block people they have a history with. Get out of here and find something else to do. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 22:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
== Note == | |||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
Since you weren't notified, ]. If I were you I wouldn't respond. ] (]) 22:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks for the notice; I won't be responding. On to ] ]! :) <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 22:28, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
::As an administrator you should know better than telling users to . It really makes us all look bad when our fellow admins cannot follow Misplaced Pages's basic requirements of civility. ] 22:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
:::No, what makes you all look bad is that you'd have blocked or at the very least threatened to block a regular editor for having said that. --] ] 01:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::(ec)You're a regular editor, and you've gotten away without blocks after saying things just as bad. So we're all potty-mouths, oh well, whatever. I'm not losing any sleep over it. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 02:00, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
::::I think Rjanag has demonstrated quite well that he is not quick with the blockhammer and use it only when it is strictly necessary. I also think he knows full well that he crossed the line there and that he won't do it again. So again there is no need for a block, as blocks are not used punitively.] 01:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
==Thanks== | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
Thanks for the sig guidance. <font face="palatino linotype" color="#000000">- Simon Dodd</font> <small>{ ]·]·]·] }</small> 02:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:01, 30 October 2024
Archives |
1: August–October 2008 2: November 2008 |
Click here to leave me any other kind of message.
Please sign your message by typing ~~~~ after it.
Query
"A 2012 analysis of data on individual participants in acupuncture studies looked at migraine and tension headaches. The analysis showed that actual acupuncture was more effective than either no acupuncture or simulated acupuncture in reducing headache frequency or severity." See Acupuncture#Headaches and migraines. This is a cut and paste from the source.
"A 2014 Australian clinical study involving 282 men and women showed that needle and laser acupuncture were modestly better at relieving knee pain from osteoarthritis than no treatment, but not better than simulated (sham) laser acupuncture." This is a cut and paste from the source. See Acupuncture#Extremity conditions.
According to NCCAM, "results of a systematic review that combined data from 11 clinical trials with more than 1,200 participants suggested that acupuncture (and acupuncture point stimulation) may help with certain symptoms associated with cancer treatments." This is a cut and paste from the article. See Acupuncture#Cancer-related conditions.
Is it a weight violation to use an article that is not a review when there are way better references already in the article or is it plagiarism? The TCM page is a different situation when there are not plenty of sources for the drug research section on pseudoscience. QuackGuru (talk) 02:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's not really clear to me what you're asking, and since you aren't using quotation marks or italics or anything else in this message it's not even clear to me what parts of your message are your comments and what are pasted from articles. Also keep in mind that I'm not familiar with these articles, I only just stumbled across them recently, so I don't have much context for the issues you're raising. If you have a question for me please present it a little more clearly so I don't have to spend time deciphering it. Thanks, rʨanaɢ (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- I edited my previous comment and added the source to make it more clear. You brought up the issue of plag on my talk page with a related article. The text in the quotes are a cut and paste but with the acupuncture article the text is not in quotation marks. Let's start with one question. Is that WP:PLAG? QuackGuru (talk) 06:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Let me stop you right there. There is no rule saying that if there is other plagiarism (or any other sort of problem) in one article, then it's OK for you to add more. There is no rule saying that if I report one instance of plagiarism (or any other sort of problem) then I have to read the entire article and report every other one. I happened to glance at just that one sentence of the article and its source (that is literally the only source in the article that I opened up and read) and saw that it was obviously plagiarized, so I dealt with it and alerted you to the issue. I am under no obligation to devote myself to scanning the entire article for it, so I'm not sure what you're trying to get at here. If you legitimately don't understand what plagiarism is then I can try to explain it more, but if you're trying to suggest that my notification to you was somehow "wrong" because there are other instances of plagiarism that I didn't report, then you are wasting your time. rʨanaɢ (talk) 13:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Nature editorial "Hard to swallow" at acupuncture
Greetings Rjanag! I've opened a discussion at Talk:Acupuncture#Citation_out_of_context about the use of the Nature editorial. I've concluded my opinion into four points. Would you care to take a look?
What's substantially different from the usage of the source at Traditional Chinese Medicine, is that when the context of the quote is restored, the whole source is solely about TCM, not about acupuncture. A mere "TCM as mainly pseudoscience, with no logical mechanism of action for the majority of its treatments." alone is undue weight, but if we include the rest of the paragraph in the article, it'd say: "Advocates respond by claiming that researchers are missing aspects of the art, notably the interactions between different ingredients in traditional therapies.". IMHO, it clearly doesn't fit to Acupuncture.
I have suggested removing the unfit entries, and finding for better sources. Administrator Kww, however, replied to me that: " I would like to suggest that the next time you want to misrepresent the contents of a source, you should refrain from doing so.". I'd appreciate if you could have a look. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- No thanks, I do not wish to continue in the discussions within this topic area. It's like herding cats. rʨanaɢ (talk) 22:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I understand you perfectly. Thanks anyway! :-) Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 18:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
support for ease and transparency
Thank you for your (seemingly) tireless effort to make the DYK process easy to understand, user-friendly and transparent to follow, willing to try suggestions and drop them if not wanted. Thank you also for patiently explaining again and again, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Three years, you were the 72nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Eight years ago, you were recipient no. 72 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Request for input
I see you have had previous involvement with the editor Hijiri88. I would welcome any input you might see fit to offer at WP:ANI#Ongoing gross incivility of Hijiri88. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 18:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Invitation
I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject R&B and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Dfrr (talk) 22:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC) |
AfD input
Hi, Rjanag. Way back in 2009, you participated in an AfD discussion for Forever Oeuvre, and voted to delete it. The article was deleted, but was subsequently recreated. The new article did not address any of the concerns whatsoever and is in the same bad state it was in before. Thusly, I have relisted it at AfD, and would very much appreciate it if you gave your input. It has passed the initial 7 day period and has been relisted again at AfD to establish a clearer consensus, so I'm now reaching out to you. There has thusfar only been one other vote, and that is for deletion. Thanks, Jacedc (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:JephJacques.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:JephJacques.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Misplaced Pages's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly 07:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
T:DYK/NN listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T:DYK/NN. Since you had some involvement with the T:DYK/NN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pppery (talk) 22:01, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Rjanag. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi Rjanag.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Rjanag. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Questionable content 1158-4.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Questionable content 1158-4.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
- Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Misplaced Pages:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Mergesomewhere
Template:Mergesomewhere has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • 06:13, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
jhosse y su grupo lora
i was working on the jhosse y su grupo lora page. i takes time translating since he's a "latin artist". this was also a project in which i needed help from the latin music group Mccoolarge (talk) 04:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- If you need time, you can work on the page in a personal sandbox (e.g., User:Mccoolarge/Jhoose Y Su Grupo Lora) and then once it's ready you can move the page to a real article.
- You will need to make sure, though, that your page meets Misplaced Pages's content criteria, particularly regarding notability. If the page doesn't meet these criteria, it is likely that it will be deleted again. rʨanaɢ (talk) 04:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Rjanag. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You are so great
You are a great guy! Thanks for being so excellent. Wow, I was stopping by to thank you for making my first solo effort at managing a DYK nom so much easier, and now you've even found a way to make thanking you easier! A remarkable Wikipedian! Innisfree987 (talk) 03:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Deletion
00:35, 12 September 2009 Rjanag (talk | contribs) deleted page Pet Protection Agreement (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: nearly word-for-word)
It has come to my knowledge that you have flagged my article page for Pet Protection Agreement. This Agreement was created and authored by myself, Rachel Hirschfeld. I am the owner of www.pettrustattorney.com, www.petprotectionagreement.com, and authored two books on pet trusts. I am the nations leading lawyer on this subject of pet trusts. I founded the Animal Law Committee at the New York County Bar Association and presently Co-Chair. I also teach pet trusts at New York University. Please undelete the article page for Pet Protection Agreement.
Rachel Hirschfeld — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soupboneh (talk • contribs) 18:54, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Chinese word "weiji" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chinese word "weiji". Since you had some involvement with the Chinese word "weiji" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Tian'anmen West Statioonn listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tian'anmen West Statioonn. Since you had some involvement with the Tian'anmen West Statioonn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PRehse (talk) 08:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Xinjiang conflict
Hey, I noticed the Ürümqi barnstar you made, and since that page is easily the best Uyghur-related article on here, I thought I might as well mention that there's an ongoing RfC on the Xinjiang conflict page if that sounds interesting. ─ ReconditeRodent « talk · contribs » 19:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Rjanag. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
View additional information
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:50, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 00:14, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of List of re-education through labor camps in China for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of re-education through labor camps in China is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of re-education through labor camps in China until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Khu'hamgaba Kitap 23:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:HoboNews.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HoboNews.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:DYK userboxes
Category:DYK userboxes has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. —andrybak (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Uw-ew
Template:Uw-ew has been nominated for merging with Template:Uw-3rr. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Uw-3rr
Template:Uw-3rr has been nominated for merging with Template:Uw-ew. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 18:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:NLIST" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Misplaced Pages:NLIST. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 4#Misplaced Pages:NLIST until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Rhododendrites \\ 17:23, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
Ten years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
... and again today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Jason Lau
Hi, I read your first nomination to delete Jason Lau and I couldn’t understand how it wasn’t deleted so I’ve nominated him again, please vote and join the discussion. Thanks Australianblackbelt (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Enhancing Chopsticks
Hey, you contributed significantly to Chopsticks. I thought I would check with you. I think the article can use a holistic revision. I posted a proposal on the talk page. It would be great to have your feedback before or while the revision takes place. Fred Hsu (talk) 20:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of English words with uncommon properties
A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of English words with uncommon properties requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 16:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Nine years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:DYKsuggestion
Template:DYKsuggestion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:DYKre
Template:DYKre has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:DYKX
Template:DYKX has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 21:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:DYKY
Template:DYKY has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 21:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:DYKfile
Template:DYKfile has been nominated for merging with Template:DYK talk. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 22:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
You have been removed from Misplaced Pages:Local Embassy due to inactivity
Hi Rjanag! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Misplaced Pages:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 6 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Misplaced Pages:Local Embassy.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:DYK archive editintro
Template:DYK archive editintro has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFX 13:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always - miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Request Edit Assistance Pinduoduo
Hi. I see you’re a member of the WikiProject China - I’ve made some proposals to update the article about Pinduoduo, posted here Pinduoduo#Suggestions for article improvements to resolve NPOV and Advertising issues.I have a conflict of interest and can’t do the edits myself. Would you have time to look at these and weigh in? Gratitude. Snowy2000 (talk) 20:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:PUFFERY" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:PUFFERY has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 27 § Misplaced Pages:PUFFERY until a consensus is reached. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Sinhala script
Sinhala script has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Rjanag! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! Avi :D (talk) 10:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC) |
"Misplaced Pages:PUFFERY" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:PUFFERY has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 25 § Misplaced Pages:PUFFERY until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Rjanag! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC) |
Nomination for deletion of Template:Lang-zh/editintro
Template:Lang-zh/editintro has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 22:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,